Input and second language acquisition: The roles of frequency, form, and function introduction to the special issue

Modern Language Journal

Volumn 93, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 329-335

  Ellis, Nick ^a   Collins, Laura ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b Dept of Electrical and Computer Engineering   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 68449085654     PISSN: 00267902     EISSN: 15404781     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00893.x     Document Type: Editorial

References (54)

1. Andersen, R. W. (1993). Four operating principles and input distribution as explanations for underdeveloped and mature morphological systems. In K. Hyltenstam & A. Viborg (Eds.), Progression and regression in language (pp. 309-339). New York: Cambridge University Press.
2. Anderson, J. R. (1989). A rational analysis of human memory. In H. L. I. Roediger & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honour of Endel Tulving (pp. 195-210). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Anderson, J. R., & Schooler, L. J. (2000). The adaptive nature of memory. In E. Tulving & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 557-570). London: Oxford University Press.
4. Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1987). Competition, variation, and language learning. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp. 157-193). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Bernolet, S., Hartsuiker, R., & Pickering, M. (2007). Shared syntactic representations in bilinguals: Evidence for the role of word-order repetition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 931-949.
6. Bock, J. K. (1986). Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 355-387.
7. Boyd, J., & Goldberg, A. E. (2009). Input effects within a constructionist framework. Modern Language Journal, 93, 418-429.
8. Bybee, J., & Hopper, P. (Eds.). (2001). Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
9. Bybee, J., & Thompson, S. (2000). Three frequency effects in syntax. Berkeley Linguistic Society, 23, 65-85.
10. Collins, C., Trofimovich, P., White, J., Cardoso, W., & Horst, M. (2009). Some input on the easy/difficult grammar question: An empirical study. Modern Language Journal, 93, 336-353.
11. Elio, R., & Anderson, J. R. (1981). The effects of category generalizations and instance similarity on schema abstraction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 7(6), 397-417.
12. Elio, R., & Anderson, J. R. (1984). The effects of information order and learning mode on schema abstraction. Memory & Cognition, 12, 20-30.
13. Ellis, N. C. (1998). Emergentism, connectionism and language learning. Language Learning, 48, 631-664.
14. Ellis, N. C. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 143-188.
15. Ellis, N. C. (2003). Constructions, chunking, and connectionism: The emergence of second language structure. In C. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 33-68). Oxford: Blackwell.
16. Ellis, N. C. (2006a). Cognitive perspectives on SLA: The associative cognitive CREED. AILA Review, 19, 100-121.
17. Ellis, N. C. (2006b). Language acquisition as rational contingency learning. Applied Linguistics, 27, 1-24.
18. Ellis, N. C. (2006c). Selective attention and transfer phenomena in SLA: Contingency, cue competition, salience, interference, overshadowing, blocking, and perceptual learning. Applied Linguistics, 27, 164-194.
19. Ellis, N. C. (2008a). The dynamics of language use, language change, and first and second language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 41, 232-249.
20. Ellis, N. C. (2008b). Usage-based and form-focused language acquisition: The associative learning of constructions, learned-attention, and the limited L2 endstate. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 372-405). London: Routledge.
21. Ellis, N. C., & Cadierno, T. (in press). Constructing a second language. Special section. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 7.
22. Ellis, N. C., & Ferreira-Junior, F. (2009). Construction learning as a function of frequency, frequency distribution, and function. Modern Language Journal, 93, 370-385.
23. Gass, S. M. (1997). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25. Goldberg, A. E. (2003). Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 219-224.
26. Goldberg, A. E. (2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27. Goldberg, A. E., Casenhiser, D. M., & Sethuraman, N. (2004). Learning argument structure generalizations. Cognitive Linguistics, 15, 289-316.
28. Goldschneider, J. M., & DeKeyser, R. (2001). Explaining the "natural order of L2 morpheme acquisition" in English: A meta-analysis of multiple determinants. Language Learning, 51, 1-50.
29. Gries, S. T., & Wulff, S. (2005). Do foreign language learners also have constructions? Evidence from priming, sorting, and corpora. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 3, 182-200.
30. Izquierdo, J. (2007). Multimedia environments in the foreign language classroom: Effects on the acquisition of the French perfective and imperfective distinction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
31. Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32. Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar: Vol. 1. Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
33. Lightbown, P. M. (1992). Getting quality input in the second/foreign language classroom. In C. Kramsch & S. McConnell-Ginet, (Eds.), Text and context: Cross-disciplinary and cross-cultural perspectives on language study (pp. 187-197). Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.
34. MacWhinney, B. (1987). The competition model. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp. 249-308). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
35. McDonough, K., & Kim, Y. (2009). Syntactic priming, type frequency, and EFL learners' production of wh-questions. Modern Language Journal, 93, 386-398.
36. McDonough, K., & Trofimovich, P. (2008). Using priming methods in second language research. London: Routledge.
37. Ninio, A. (1999). Pathbreaking verbs in syntactic development and the question of prototypical transitivity. Journal of Child Language, 26, 619-653.
38. Ninio, A. (2006). Language and the learning curve: A new theory of syntactic developemnt. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
39. Ortega, L., & Iberri-Shea, G. (2005). Longitudinal research in second language acquisition: Recent trends and future directions. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 26-45.
40. Pickering, M. J. (2006). The dance of dialogue. The Psychologist, 19, 734-737.
41. Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. C. (2006). Alignment as the basis for successful communication. Research on Language and Computation, 4, 203-228.
42. Rescorla, R. A. (1968). Probability of shock in the presence and absence of CS in fear conditioning. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 66, 1-5.
43. Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current theory and research (pp. 64-99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
44. Robinson, P., & Ellis, N. C. (Eds.). (2008). A handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition. London: Routledge.
45. Rosch, E., & Mervis, C. B. (1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 192-233.
46. Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 382-439.
47. Shanks, D. R. (1995). The psychology of associative learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
48. Swain, M. (1988). Manipulating and complementing content teaching to maximize second language learning. TESL Canada Journal, 6(1), 68-83.
49. Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language. Boston: Harvard University Press.
50. Williams, J. N., & Kuribara, C. (2008). Comparing a nativist and emergentist approach to the intial stage of SLA: An investigation of Japanese scrambling. Lingua, 118, 533-553.
51. Wulff, S., Ellis, N. C., Römer, U., Bardovi-Harlig, K., & LeBlanc, C. (2009). The acquisition of tense-aspect: Converging evidence from corpora and telicity ratings. Modern Language Journal, 93, 354-369.
52. Year, J., & Gordon, P. (2009). Korean speakers' acquisition of the English ditransitive construction: The role of verb prototype, input distribution, and frequency. Modern Language Journal, 93, 389-417.
53. Zipf, G. K. (1935). The psycho-biology of language: An introduction to dynamic philology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
54. Zyzik, E. (2006). Transitivity alternations and sequence learning: Insights from L2 Spanish production data. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 449-485.