Pragmatics in second language learning

Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 317-334

  Kasper, Gabriele ^a   Roever, Carsten ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867006033     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410612700-28     Document Type: Chapter

References (132)

1. Achiba, M. (2002). Learning to request in a second language: Child interlanguage pragmatics. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
2. Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
3. Babbie, E. (2004). The practice of social research (10th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
4. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1999). Exploring the interlanguage of interlanguage pragmatics: A research agenda for acquisitional pragmatics. Language Learning, 49, 677-713.
5. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2001). Empirical evidence of the need for instruction in pragmatics. In K. R. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 13-32). New York: Cambridge University Press.
6. Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Dornyei, Z. (1998). Do language learners recognize pragmatic violations? Pragmatic vs. grammatical awareness in instructed L2 learning. TESOL Quarterly, 32, 233-259.
7. Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Hartford, B. S. (1993). Learning the rules of academic talk: A longitudinal study of pragmatic development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 279-304.
8. Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Hartford, B. (1996). Input in an institutional setting. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18,171-188.
9. Bernard, H. R. (2000). Social research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10. Bialystok, E. (1993). Symbolic representation and attentional control in pragmatic competence. In G. Kasper & S. Blum-Kulka (Eds.), Interlanguage pragmatics (pp. 43-59). New York: Oxford University Press.
11. Billmyer, K. (1990). –I really like your lifestyle—: ESL learners learning how to compliment. Penn Working Papers in Educational Linguistics, 6, 31-48.
12. Billmyer, K., & Varghese, M. (2000). Investigationg instrument-based pragmatic variability: Effects of enhancing discourse completion tests. Applied Linguistics, 21, 517-552.
13. Blum-Kulka, S., & Olshtain, E. (1986). Too many words: Length of utterance and pragmatic failure. Studies in Second Language Acquisition8,47-61.
14. Blum-Kulka, S. (1982). Learning to say what you mean in a second language. Applied Linguistics, 3,29-59.
15. Blum-Kulka, S. (1991). Interlanguage pragmatics: The case of requests. In R. Phillipson, E. Kellerman, L. Selinker, M. Sharwood Smith, & M. Swain (Eds.), Foreign/Second language pedagogy research (pp. 255-272). Clevedon, Avon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
16. Bouton, L. F. (1992). Culture, pragmatics and implicature. A Final Yearbook1992, 35-61.
17. Bouton, L. F. (1994). Conversational implicature in the second language: Learned slowly when not deliberately taught. Journal of Pragmatics, 22,157-167.
18. Bouton, L. F. (1999). Developing nonnative speaker skills in interpreting conversational implicatures in English: Explicit teaching can ease the process. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Culture in second language teaching and learning (pp. 47-70). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19. Boxer, D. (1996). Ethnographic interviewing as a research tool in speech act analysis: The case of complaints. In S. M. Gass & J. Neu (Eds.), Speech acts across cultures (pp. 217-239). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
20. Brown, J. D. (2001a). Pragmatics tests: Different purposes, different tests. In K. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 301-325). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21. Brown, J. D. (2001b). Using surveys in language programs. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
22. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. D. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
23. Carrell, P. (1981). Relative difficulty of request forms in L1/L2 comprehension. In M. Hines, & W. Rutherford (Eds.), On TESOL '81 (pp. 141-152). Washington, DC: TESOL.
24. Clark, H. H. (1979). Responding to indirect speech acts. Cognitive Psychology, 11, 430-477.
25. Cohen, A. D. (1997). Developing pragmatic ability: Insights from the accelerated study of Japanese. In H. M. Cook, K. Hijirida, & M. Tahara (Eds.), New trends and issues in teaching Japanese language and culture (Technical Report #15; pp. 133-159). Honolulu: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
26. Cohen, A., & Olshtain, E. (1981). Developing a measure of sociocultural competence: The case of apology. Language Learning, 31,113-134.
27. Cohen, A., & Olshtain, E. (1993). The production of speech acts by EFL learners. TESOL Quarterly, 27, 33-56.
28. Cook, H. M. (2001). Why can't learners of Japanese as a foreign language distinguish polite from impolite speech styles? In K. R. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 80-102). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
29. Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (Eds.). (1998). Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
30. DuFon, M. A. (1999). The acquisition of linguistic politeness in Indonesian as a second language by sojourners in naturalistic interactions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Hawaii at Manoa.
31. Edmondson, W., & House, J. (1991). Do learners talk too much? The waffle phenomenon in interlanguage pragmatics. In R. Phillipson, E. Kellerman, L. Selinker, M. Sharwood Smith, & M. Swain (Eds.), Foreign/second language pedagogy research: A commemorative volume for Claus F&rch (pp. 273-287). Clevedon, Avon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
32. Eisenstein, M., & Bodman, J. W. (1986).–I very appreciate—: Expressions of gratitude by native and nonnative speakers of American English. Applied Linguistics, 7,167-185.
33. Eisenstein, M., & Bodman, J. W. (1993). Expressing gratitude in American English. In G. Kasper & S. Blum-Kulka (Eds.), Interlanguage pragmatics (pp. 64-81). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
34. Ellis, R. (1992). Learning to communicate in the classroom: A study of two learners' requests. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14,1-23.
35. Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis. Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36. Firch, C., & Kasper, G. (1982). Phatic, metalingual and metacommunicative functions in discourse: Gambits and repair. In N. E. Enkvist (Ed.), Impromptu speech (pp. 71-103). Abo, Finland: Abo Akademi University.
37. Fraser, B., Rintell, E., & Walters, J. (1981). An approach to conducting research on the acquisition of pragmatic competence in a second language. In D. Larsen-Freeman (Ed.), Discourse analysis (pp. 75-81). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
38. Fukuya, Y., & Clark, M. (2001). Input enhancement of mitigators. In L. Bouton (Ed.), Pragmatics and language learning, Vol. 10 (pp. 111-130). Urbana-Champaign, IL: Division of English as an International Language, University of Illinois.
39. García, C. (1989). Apologizing in English: Politeness strategies used by native and non-native speakers. Multilingua, 8, 3-20.
40. Gass, S. M., & Houck, N. (1999). Interlanguage refusals: A cross-cultural study of Japanese-English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
41. Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2000). Stimulated recall methodology in second language research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
42. Golato, A. (2003). Studying compliment responses: A comparison of DCTs and recordings of naturally occurring talk. Applied Linguistics, 24, 90-121.
43. Gubrium, J. F., & Holstein, J. A. (Eds.). (2002). Handbook of interview research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
44. Hall, J. (1995). –Aw, man, where you goin'?—: Classroom interaction and the development of L2 interactional competence. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 6, 37-62.
45. Hartford, B. S., & Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1992). Experimental and observational data in the study of interlanguage pragmatics. In L. F. Bouton, & Y. Kachru (Eds.), Pragmatics and language learning monograph series(pp. 33-52). Urbana, IL: DEIL.
46. Hassall, T. J. (1997). Requests by Australian learners of Indonesian. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Australian National University.
47. Hill, T. (1997). The development of pragmatic competence in an EFL context. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Temple University, Tokyo, Japan.
48. Hinkel, E. (1997). Appropriateness of advice: DCT and multiple choice data. Applied Linguistics, 18, 126.
49. House, J. (1996). Developing pragmatic fluency in English as a foreign language: Routines and metapragmatic awareness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 225-252.
50. House, J., & Kasper, G. (1981). Zur Rolle der Kognition in Kommunikationskursen. [The role of cognition in communication courses.] Die Neueren Sprachen, 80, 42-55.
51. Hudson, T. (2001). Indicators for pragmatic instruction: Some quantitative measures. In K. R. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 283-300). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
52. Hudson, T., Detmer, E., & Brown, J. D. (1995). Developing prototypic measures of cross-cultural pragmatics (Technical Report #7). Honolulu: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
53. Johnston, B., Kasper, G., & Ross, S. (1998). Effect of rejoinders in production questionnaires. Applied Linguistics19, 2,157-182.
54. Kasper, G. (1981). Pragmatische Aspekte in der Interimsprache. Tübingen: Narr.
55. Kasper, G. (2000). Data collection in pragmatics research. In H. Spencer-Oatey (Ed.), Culturally speaking (pp. 316-341). London: Continuum.
56. Kasper, G. (2001a). Classroom research on interlanguage pragmatics. In K. R. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 33-60). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
57. Kasper, G. (2001b). Four perspectives on pragmatic development. Applied Linguistics, 22, 502-530.
58. Kasper, G., & Rose, K. R. (2002). Pragmatic development in a second language. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
59. Kasper, G., & Rose, K. R. (in press). Research methods in interlanguage pragmatics: A critical review. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
60. Kerekes, J. (1992). Development in nonnative speakers' use and perception of assertiveness and supportiveness in mixed-sex conversations (Occasional Paper No. 21). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii at Manoa, Department of English as a Second Language.
61. Kim, I.-O. (2000). Relationship of onset of age in ESL acquisition and extent of informal input to appropriateness and nativeness in performing four speech acts in English. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, New York University.
62. Koike, D. A. (1989). Pragmatic competence and adult L2 acquisition: Speech acts in interlanguage. Modern Language Journal, 73, 279-289.
63. Koike, D. A. (1996). Transfer of pragmatic competence and suggestions in Spanish foreign language learning. In S. M. Gass & J. Neu (Eds.), Speech acts across cultures (pp. 257-281). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
64. Kubota, M. (1995). Teachability of conversational implicature to Japanese EFL learners. IRLT Bulletin, 9, 35-67. Tokyo: The Institute for Research in Language Teaching.
65. Kuha, M. (1999). The influence of interaction and instructions on speech act data. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University.
66. Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
67. Leech, G. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.
68. Liddicoat, A. J., & Crozet, C. (2001). Acquiring French interactional norms through instruction. In K. R. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 125-144). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
69. LoCastro, V. (2001). Individual differences in second language acquisition: Attitudes, learner subjectivity, and pragmatic norms. System, 29, 69-89.
70. Lyster, R. (1994). The effect of functional-analytic teaching on aspects of French immersion students' sociolinguistic competence. Applied Linguistics, 15, 263-287.
71. Maeshiba, N., Yoshinaga, N., Kasper, G., & Ross, S. (1996). Transfer and proficiency in interlanguage apologizing. In S. M. Gass & J. Neu (Eds.), Speech acts across cultures (pp. 155-187). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
72. Margalef-Boada, T. (1993). Research methods in interlanguage pragmatics: An inquiry into data collection procedures. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University.
73. Matsumura, S. (2001). Learning the rules for offering advice: A quantiative approach to second language socialization. Language Learning, 51, 635-679.
74. Miles, P. (1994). Compliments and gender. (Occasional Paper No. 26). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii at Manoa.
75. Miller, D. C., & Salkind, N. J. (2002). Handbook of research design and social measurement (6th ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
76. Morrow, C. (1996). The pragmatic effects of instruction on ESL learners' production of complaint and refusal speech acts., Unpublished doctoral dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo.
77. Niezgoda, K., & Rover, C. (2001). Pragmatic and grammatical awareness: A function of learning environment? In K. R. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 63-79). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
78. Norton, B. (2000). Identity and language learning. Harlow, Essex, UK: Longman/Pearson Education.
79. Ohta, A. (1999). Interactional routines and the socialization of interactional style in adult learners of Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics, 31,1493-1512.
80. Ohta, A. S. (2001). From acknowledgment to alignment: A longitudinal study of the development of expression of alignment by classroom learners of Japanese. In K. R. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 103-120). New York: Cambridge University Press.
81. Olshtain, E., & Cohen, A. D. (1989). Speech act behavior across languages. In H. Dechert & M. Raupach (Eds.), Transfer in language production (pp. 53-67). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
82. Olshtain, E., & Cohen, A. (1990). The learning of complex speech act behavior. TESL Canada Journal, 7, 45-65.
83. Pearson, L. (1998). Spanish L2 pragmatics: The effects of metapragmatic discussion. Paper presented at the Second Language Research Forum, University of Hawaii, Manoa, October.
84. Perakyla, A. (1997). Reliability and validity in research based on transcripts. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research (pp. 201-220). London: Sage.
85. Piirainen-Marsh, A. (1995). Face in second language conversation. Jyväskylä, Finland: University of Jyväskyla.
86. Psathas, G. (1990). Introduction: Methodological issues and recent developments in the study of naturally occurring interaction. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Interaction competence (pp. 1-30). Washington, DC: International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis and University Press of America.
87. Rintell, E. (1981). Sociolinguistic variation and pragmatic ability: A look at learners. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 27, 11-34.
88. Rintell, E., & Mitchell, C. J. (1989). Studying requests and apologies: An inquiry into method. In S. Blum-Kulka, J. House, & G. Kasper (Eds.), Cross-cultural pragmatics (pp. 248-272). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
89. Robinson, M. A. (1992). Introspective methodology in interlanguage pragmatics research. In G. Kasper (Ed.), Pragmatics of Japanese as a native and target language (Technical Report #3; pp. 27-82). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii at Manoa, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
90. Rover, C. (1996). Linguistische Routinen: Systematische, psycholinguistische und fremdsprachendidaktische Überlegungen, Fremdsprachen und Hochschule, 46, 43-60.
91. Roever, C. (in press). Testing ESL pragmatics: Development and validation of a web-based assessment battery. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
92. Rose, K. R. (2000). An exploratory cross-sectional study of interlanguage pragmatic development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 27-67.
93. Rose, K. R., & Kasper, G. (Eds.). (2001). Pragmatics in language teaching. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
94. Rose, K. R., & Ng, C. (2001). Inductive and deductive teaching of compliments and compliment responses. In K. R. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 145-170). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
95. Salsbury, T., & Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2001). –I know your mean, but I don't think so.— Disagreements in L2 English. In L. F. Bouton (Ed.), Pragmatics and language learning (Vol. 10; pp. 131-151). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois, Division of English as an International Language.
96. Salsbury, T., & Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2000). Oppositional talk and the acquisition of modality in L2 English. In B. Swierzbin, F. Morris, M. Anderson, C. A. Klee, & E. Tarone (Eds.), Social and cognitive factors in second language acquisition (pp. 56-76). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
97. Sawyer, M. (1992). The development of pragmatics in Japanese as a second language: The sentence-final particle ne. In G. Kasper (Ed.), Pragmatics of Japanese as a native and foreign language (Technical Report #3; pp. 83-125). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii at Manoa, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
98. Scarcella, R. (1983). Discourse accent in second language performance. In S. M. Gass & L. Selinker (Eds.), Language transfer in language learning (pp. 306-326). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
99. Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse markers. New York: Cambridge University Press.
100. Schmidt, R. (1983). Interaction, acculturation and the acquisition of communicative competence. In N. Wolfson & E. Judd (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 137-174). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
101. Schmidt, R. (1995). Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in learning. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 1-63). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center.
102. Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3-33). New York: Cambridge University Press.
103. Schmidt, R., & Frota, S. N. (1986). Developing basic conversational ability in a second language: A case study of an adult learner of Portuguese. In R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn (pp. 237-326). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
104. Schumann, J. H. (1978). The pidginization process: A model for second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
105. Sharwood Smith, M. (1993). Input enhancement in instructed SLA: Theoretical bases. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15,165-179.
106. Shimamura, K. (1993). Judgment of request strategies and contextual factors by American and Japanese EFL learners (Occasional Paper #25). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii at Manoa, Department of English as a Second Language.
107. Siegal, M. (1994). Looking east: Identity construction & White women learning Japanese. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California at Berkeley.
108. Siegal, M. (1996). The role of learner subjectivity in second language sociolinguistic competency: Western women learning Japanese. Applied Linguistics, 17, 356-382.
109. Silverman, D. (2001). Interpreting qualitative data (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
110. Smagorinsky, P. (1998). Thinking and speech and protocol analysis. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 5,157-177.
111. Takahashi, S. (1995). Pragmatic transferability of L1 indirect request strategies perceived by Japanese learners of English. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Hawaii at Manoa.
112. Takahashi, S. (1996). Pragmatic transferability. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18,189-223.
113. Takahashi, S. (2000). The effects of motivation and proficiency on the awareness of pragmatic strategies in implicit foreign language learning. Unpublished manuscript.
114. Takahashi, S. (2001). The role of input enhancement in developing pragmatic competence. In K. R. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 171-199). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
115. Takahashi, T., & Beebe, L. (1987). The development of pragmatic competence by Japanese learners of English. JALT Journal, 8,131-155.
116. Tao, H., & Thompson, S. A. (1991). English backchannels in Mandarin conversation: A case study of superstratum pragmatic –interference—. Journal of Pragmatics, 16, 209-223.
117. Tateyama, Y. (2001). Explicit and implicit teaching of pragmatics routines: Japanese sumimasen. In K. R. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 200-222). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
118. Tateyama, Y., Kasper, G., Mui, L., Tay, H.-M., & Thananart, O. (1997). Explicit and implicit teaching of pragmatic routines. In L. Bouton (Ed.), Pragmatics and language learning (Vol. 8; pp. 163-177). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
119. Thomas, J. (1983). Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics, 4, 91-112.
120. Tokuda, M. (2001). L2 learners' perceptions of politeness in Japanese: The evaluations on non-native speaker in L2 Japanese. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Hawaii at Manoa.
121. Trosborg, A. (1995). Interlanguage pragmatics: Requests, complaints and apologies. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
122. Walters, J. (1980). Grammar, meaning, and sociological appropriateness in second language acquisition. Canadian Journal of Psychology—Revue Canadienne de Psychologie, 34, 337-345.
123. Wengraf, T. (2001). Qualitative research interviewing. London: Sage.
124. White, S. (1989). Backchannels across cultures: A study of Americans and Japanese. Language in Society, 18, 59-76.
125. Widjaja, C. S. (1997). A study of data refusal: Taiwanese vs. American females. University of Hawaii Working Papers in ESL, 15(2), 1-43.
126. Wildner-Bassett, M. (1984). Improving pragmatic aspects of learners' interlanguage. Tübingen, Germany: Narr.
127. Wildner-Bassett, M. (1986). Teaching and learning 'polite noises': Improving pragmatic aspects of advanced adult learners' interlanguage. In G. Kasper (Ed.), Learning, teaching and communication in the foreign language classroom (pp. 163-178). Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University Press.
128. Wildner-Bassett, M. (1994). Intercultural pragmatics and proficiency: –Polite— noises for cultural appropriateness. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 3-17.
129. Wishnoff, J. R. (2000). Hedging your bets: L2 learners' acquisition of pragmatic devices in academic writing and computer-mediated discourse. Second Language Studies,19, 127-157. (Working Papers of the Department of Second Language Studies, University of Hawaii.)
130. Yamashita, S. O. (1996). Six measures of JSL pragmatics (Technical Report #14). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
131. Yoshimi, D. R. (2001). Explicit instruction and the use of interactional discourse markers. In K. R. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 223-244). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
132. Yoshitake, S. S. (1997). Measuring interlanguage pragmatic competence of Japanese students of English as a foreign language: A multi-test framework evaluation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia Pacific University, Novata, CA.