Task-based instruction

Language Teaching

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 1-14

  Skehan, Peter ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85010146166     PISSN: 02614448     EISSN: 14753049     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S026144480200188X     Document Type: Article

References (136)

1. Aston, G. (1986). Trouble-shooting in interaction with learners: The more the merrier? Applied Linguistics, 7, 128-143.
2. Block, D. (2001). ‘McCommunication’: A problem in the frame for SLA. In D. Block & D. Cameron (Eds.), Globalisation and language teaching, Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters.
3. Brock, C. (1986). The effects of referential questions on ESL classroom discourse. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 47-59.
4. Brumfit, C. & Johnson, K. (1979). The communicative approach to language teaching, Oxford University Press.
5. Bruton, A. (2002). From tasking purposes to purposing tasks. English Language Teaching Journal, 56 (3), 280-288.
6. Bygate, M. (1996). Effects of task repetition: Appraising the developing language of learners. In J. Willis & D. Willis (Eds.).
7. Bygate, M. (1999). Task as context for the framing, reframing, and unframing of language. System, 27, 33-48.
8. Bygate, M. (2001). Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of oral language. In Bygate, Skehan & Swain (Eds.).
9. Bygate, M., Skehan, P. & Swain, M. (2001). (Eds.). Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and testing, London: Longman.
10. Cook, G. (2000). Language play, language learning, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11. Coughlan, P. & Duff, P. (1994). Same task, different activities: Analysis of a second language acquisition task from an activity theory perspective. In J. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research, Norwood, N. J.: Ablex.
12. Crookes, G. (1989). Planning and interlanguage variation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 367-383.
13. Cunningham, S. & Moor, P. (1999). Cutting edge, London: Longman.
14. DeKeyser, R., Robinson, P., Salaberry, R. & Harringon, M. (in press). What gets processed in processing instruction? A commentary on Bill Van Patten's ‘update’. Language Learning
15. Dornyei, Z. & Kormos, J. (2001). The role of individual and social variables in oral task performance. Language Teaching Research, 4, 275-300.
16. Doughty, C. (1991). Second language instruction does make a difference: Evidence from an empirical study on SL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 431-469.
17. Doughty, C. (2001). Cognitive aspects of focus on form. In P. Robinson (Ed.).
18. Doughty, C. & Varela, E. (1998). Communicative focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.).
19. Doughty, C. & Williams, J. (1998a). Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Doughty, C. & Williams, J. (1998b). Pedagogic choices in focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.).
21. Duff, P. (1986). Another look at interlanguage talk: Taking task to task. In R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn, Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.
22. Duff, P. (1993). Tasks and interlanguage performance: An SLA perspective. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice, Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters.
23. Ellis, R. (1987). Interlanguage variability in narrative discourse: Style shifting in the use of the past tense. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 9, 12-20.
24. Ellis, R. (2000). Task-based research and language pedagogy. Language Teaching Research, 4 (3), 193-220.
25. ELLIS, R. (2001). Non-reciprocal tasks, comprehension, and second language acquisition. In Bygate, Skehan & Swain (Eds.).
26. Ellis, R. (in press). Task-based language learning and teaching, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27. Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H. & Loewen, S. (2001). Preemptive focus on form in the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 35 (3), 407-432.
28. Firth, A. & Wagner, J. (1997). On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research. Modern Language Journal, 81 (3), 285-300.
29. Foster, P. (1998). A classroom perspective on the negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics, 19 (1), 1-23.
30. Foster, P. (2001). Lexical measures in task-based performance. Paper presented at the AAAL Conference, Vancouver, Canada.
31. Foster, P. & Skehan, P. (1996). The influence of planning on performance in task-based learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18 (3), 299-324.
32. Foster, P. & Skehan, P. (1999). The effect of source of planning and focus ofplanning on task-based performance. Language Teaching Research, 3 (3), 185-214.
33. Foster, P. Tonkyn, A. & Wigglesworth, J. (2000). Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons. Applied Linguistics, 21 (3), 354-375.
34. Fotos, S. (1993). Consciousness-raising and noticing through focus on form: Grammar task performance versus formal instruction. Applied Linguistics, 14 (4), 385-407.
35. Fotos, S. (1994). Integrating grammar instruction and communicative language use through grammar consciousness-raising tasks. TESOL Quarterly, 28 (2), 323-351.
36. Fotos, S. & Ellis, R. (1991). Communicating about grammar: A task-based approach. TESOL Quarterly, 25, 605-628.
37. Fotos, S. (1998). Shifting the focus from forms to form in the EFL classroom. English Language Teaching Journal, 52 (4), 301-307.
38. Fried-booth, D. (1986). Project work, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
39. Gass, S. (2002). Interactionist perspectives in Second Language Acquisition. In R. Kaplan (Ed.), Handbook of applied linguistics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40. Gass, S., Mackey, A., Alvarez, M. & Fernandez, M. (1999). The effects of task repetition on linguistic output. Language Learning, 49 (4), 549-581.
41. Gass, S. & Varonis, E. (1986). Sex differences in NNS/NNS interactions. In R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition, Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.
42. Geddes, M. & Sturtridge, G. (1979). Listening links, London: Heinemann.
43. Givon, T. (1985). Function, structure, and language acquisition. In D. Slobin (Ed.), The cross-linguistic study of language acquisition, Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1005-1028.
44. Guariento, W. & Morley, J. (2001). Text and task authenticity in the EFL classroom. English Language Teaching Journal, 55 (4), 347-353.
45. Haines, S. (1989). Projects for the EFL classroom, London: Nelson.
46. Harley, B. & Swain, M. (1984). The interlanguage of immersion students and its implications for second language teaching. In A. Davies, C. Criper & A. Howatt (Eds.), Interlanguage, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 291-311.
47. Harmer, J. (1983). The practice of communicative language teaching(1st Edn.), London: Longman.
48. Harmer, J. (2001). The practice of communicative language teaching(3rd Edn.), London: Longman.
49. Hatch, E. (1978). Second language acquisition: A book of readings, Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.
50. Hunt, K. (1965). Grammar structures written at three grade levels, Champaign, Ill.: National Council of Teachers of English.
51. Jourdenais, R., Ota, M., Stauffer, S., Boyson, B. & Doughty, C. (1995). Does textual enhancement promote noticing? A think-aloud protocal analysis. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning, Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press, 183-216.
52. Kasper, G. (1997). ‘A’ stands for acquisition: A response to Firth and Wagner. Modern Language Journal, 81 (3), 307-312.
53. Kay, S. & Jones, V. (2001). Inside out, London: Heinemann.
54. Koponen, M. & Riggenbach, H. (2000). Overview: Varying perspectives on fluency. In H. Riggenbach (Ed.), Perspectives on fluency, Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press Robinson.
55. Krashen, S. (1985). The Input Hypothesis, London: Longman.
56. Lantolf, J. (2000). Sociocultural theory and second language learning, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
57. Leow, R. (1998). Towards operationalising the process of attention in SLA: Evidence for Tomlin and Villa's (1994) fine-grained analysis. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19, 133-159.
58. Levelt, W. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
59. Lightbown, P. ((2000). Classroom SLA research and second language teaching. Applied Linguistics, 21 (4), 431-462.
60. Long, M. (1983). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics, 4 (2), 126-141.
61. Long, M. (1985a). Input and second language acquisition theory. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input and second language acquisition, Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.
62. Long, M. (1985b). A role for instruction in second language acquisition: Task-based language training. In K. Hyltenstam & M. Pienemann (Eds.), Modelling and assessing second language acquisition, Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters, 77-100.
63. Long, M. (1989). Task, group, and task-group interaction. University of Hawai'i Working Papers in English as a Second Language, 8 (2), 1-26.
64. Long, M. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methdology. In K. De Bot, R. Ginsbert & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 39-52.
65. Long, M., Inagaki, S. & Ortega, L. (1998). The role of implicit negative feedback in SLA: Models and recasts in Japanese and Spanish. Modern Language Journal, 82, 357-371.
66. Long, M. & Porter, P. (1985). Group work, interlanguage talk, and second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 207-228.
67. LONG, M. & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: theory, research, and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom SLA, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
68. Loschky, L. & Bley-vroman, R. (1993). Grammar and task-based methodology. In Gass & Crookes (1993b).
69. Lynch, T. (1997). Nudge, nudge: Teacher interventions in task-based learner talk. English Language Teaching Journal 51 (4), 317-325.
70. Lynch, T. (2001). Seeing what they meant: Transcribing as a route to noticing. English Language Teaching Journal, 55 (2), 124-132.
71. Lynch, T. & Mclean, J. (2001). ‘A case of exercising’: Effects of immediate task repetition on learners’ performance. In Bygate, Skehan & Swain (Eds.).
72. Lyster, R. (1998). Recasts, repetition, and ambiguity in L2 classroom discourse. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 20, 51-81.
73. Lyster, R. & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19 (1), 37-66.
74. Mackey, A. (1999). Input, interaction, and second language development: An empirical study of question formation in ESL. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21 (4), 551-588.
75. Mackey, A., Gass, S. & McDonough, K. (2000). Do learners recognize implicit negative feedback as feedback? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22 (4), 471-497.
76. Mackey, A., Philp, J., Egi, T., Fujii, A. & Tatsumi, T. (in press). Individual differences in working memory, noticing of interactional feedback, and L2 development. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed second language acquisition, Amsterdam: Benjamins.
77. MacWhinney, B. (2000a). The CHILDES Project: Tools for analysing talk: Volume 1: Transcription format and programs (3rd Edn.). Mahway, N. J.: Erlbaum.
78. MacWhinney, B. (2000b). The CHILDES Project: Tools for analysing talk: Volume 2: The Database (3rd Edn.). Mahway, N. J.: Erlbaum.
79. Malvern, D. & Richards, B. J. (1997). A new measure of lexical diversity. In A. Ryan & A. Wray (Eds.), Evolving models of language, Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters.
80. Malvern, D. & Richards, B. J. (2002). Investigating accommodation in language proficiency interviews using a new measure of lexical diversity. Language Testing 19 (1), 85-104.
81. McLaughlin, B. (1980). Theory and research in second language learning: An emerging paradigm. Language Learning, 30, 331-350.
82. Mehnert, U. (1998). The effects of different lengths of time for planning on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 83-108.
83. Mitchell, R. & Johnstone, R. (1986). The routinisation of ‘communicative’ methodology. In C. Brumfit (Ed.), The practice of communicative teaching, Oxford: Pergamon.
84. Morrow, K. (1977). Techniques of evaluation for a notional syllabus Centre for Applied Language Studies: University of Reading.
85. Morrow, K. (1979). Communicative language testing: Revolution or evolution. In C. J. Brumfit & K. Johnson (Eds.).
86. Nakahama, Y., Tyler, A. & Van Lier, L. (2001). Negotiation ofmeaning in conversational and information gap activities: A comparative discourse analysis. TESOL Quarterly 35 (3), 377-405.
87. Nemeth, N. & Kormos, J. (2001). Pragmatic aspects of task performance: The case ofargumentation. Language Teaching Research, 5 (3), 213-240.
88. Newton, J. (2001). Options for vocabulary learning through communication tasks. English Language Teaching Journal 55 (1), 30-37.
89. Nicholas, H., Lightbown, P. & Spada, N. (2001). Recasts as feedback to language learners. Language Learning, 51 (4), 719-758.
90. Nobuyushi, J. & Ellis, R. (1993). Focussed communication tasks and second language acquisition. English Language Teaching Journal, 47 (3), 203-210.
91. Nunan, D. (1989). Designing tasks for the communicative classroom, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
92. Ortega, L. (1999). Planning and focus on form in L2 oral performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 21, 109-148.
93. Pica, T. & Doughty, C. (1985). Input and interaction in the communicative language classroom: A comparison of teacher-fronted and group activities. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input and second language acquisition, Rowley, Mass: Newbury House.
94. Pica, T. (1994). Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second language learning, conditions, processes, outcomes? Language Learning, 44, 493-527.
95. Pica, T., Kanagy, R. & Falodun, J. (1993). Choosing and using communicative tasks for second language instruction. In Gass & Crookes (1993b).
96. Pienemann, M. (1998). Language processing and second language development: Processability theory Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
97. Plough, I. & Gass, S. (1993). Interlocutor and task familiarity: Effect on interactional structure. In Gass & Crookes (1993b).
98. Porte, G. (in press). Appraising research in second language learning, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
99. Prabhu, N. S. (1987). Second language pedagogy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
100. Robinson, P. (2001). Task complexity, cognitive load, and syllabus design. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
101. Robinson, P. (2002) Attention and memory during SLA. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), Handbook of research in second language acquisition, Oxford: Blackwell.
102. Rubdy, R. (1998). Key concepts in ELT: Task. English Language Teaching Journal, 52 (3), 264-265.
103. Samuda, V. (2001). Guiding relationships between form and meaning during task performance: The role of the teacher. In Bygate, Skehan & Swain (Eds.).
104. Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 17-46.
105. Seedhouse, P. (1997). Combining form and meaning. English Language Teaching Journal, 51 (4), 336-344.
106. Seedhouse, P. (1999). Task-based interaction. English Language Teaching Journal, 53 (3), 149-156.
107. Sheen, R. (1993). Double standards in research selection and evaluation: The case of comparison of methods, instruction, and taskwork. RELC Journal, 24 (2), 1-28.
108. Sheen, R. (1994). A critical analysis of the advocacy of the task-based syllabus. TESOL Quarterly, 28 (1), 127-151.
109. Sheen, R. (2002). ‘Focus on form’ and ‘focus on forms’. English Language Teaching Journal, 56 (3), 303-305.
110. Shehadeh, A. (2001). Self and other initiated modified output during task-based interaction. TESOL Quarterly, 35 (3), 433-457.
111. Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
112. Skehan, P. & Foster, P. (1997). The influence of planning and post-task activities on accuracy and complexity in task based learning. Language Teaching Research, 1 (3).
113. Skehan, P. & Foster, P. (1999). The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings. Language Learning, 49 (1), 93-120.
114. Skehan, P. & Foster, P. (2001). Cognition and tasks. In P. Robinson (Ed.).
115. Skehan, P. & Foster, P. (2002, ms). The effects of posttask activities on the accuracy of language during task performance. King's College, London.
116. Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & Seidlehofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 245-256.
117. Swain, M. & Lapkin, S. (1982). Evaluating bilingual education: A Canadian case study, Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters.
118. Swain, M. & Lapkin, S. (2001). Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring task effects. In Bygate, Skehan & Swain (Eds.).
119. Thornbury, S. (1997). Reformulation and reconstruction: Tasks that promote ‘noticing’. English Language Teaching Journal, 51 (4), 326-335.
120. Trahey, M. & White, L. (1993). Positive evidence in the second language classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15 (2), 181-204.
121. Van Lier, L. & Matsuo, N. (2000). Varieties of conversational experience: Looking for learning opportunities. Applied Language Learning, 11, (2), 265-287.
122. Van Patten, B. (1996). Input processing and grammar instruction, New York: Ablex. Van Patten, B. (in press). Processing instruction: An update. Language Learning
123. Wendel, J. (1997). Planning and second language narrative production Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Temple University, Japan.
124. Wesche, M. & Skehan, P. (2002). Communicative teaching, content-based instruction, and task-based learning. In R. Kaplan (Ed.), Handbook of applied linguistics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
125. White, R. (1988). The ELT curriculum, Oxford: Blackwell.
126. Widdowson, H. G. (1978). Teaching language as communication, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
127. Widdowson, H. G. (1979). Explorations in applied linguistics, Vol. 2 Oxford: Oxford University Press.
128. Wigglesworth, J. (1997). An investigation of planning time and proficiency level on oral test discourse. Language Testing, 14 (1), 85-106.
129. Wigglesworth, J. (2001). Influences on performance in task-based oral assessments. In Bygate, Skehan & Swain (Eds.).
130. Williams, J. (2001). Learner-generated attention to form. Language Learning, 51, 303-346.
131. Willis, J. (1996). A framework for task-based learning, London: Longman.
132. Willis, D. & Willis, J. (1988). COBUILD Book 1, London: Collins.
133. Yuan, F. & Ellis, R. (in press). The effects of pre-task planning and on-line planning on fluency, accuracy, and complexity in L2 oral production. Applied Linguistics, 24, 1.
134. Yule, G. (1997). Referential communication tasks, New York: Erlbaum.
135. Yule, G. & McDonald, D. (1990). Resolving referential conflicts in L2 interaction: The effect of proficiency and interactive role. Language Learning 40, 539-556.
136. Yule, G. & Powers, M. (1994). Investigating the communicative outcomes oftask-based interaction. System 22 (1), 81-91.