The interactive effects of pragmatic-eliciting tasks and pragmatic instruction

Foreign Language Annals

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 478-500

  Fukuya, Yoshinori J ^b   Martínez Flor, Alicia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT JAUME I   (Spain)

^b NONE

Author keywords

E mail; Instruction; Pragmatics; Speech acts; Telephone

Indexed keywords

EID: 53249090368     PISSN: 0015718X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1944-9720.2008.tb03308.x     Document Type: Article

References (102)

1. Alcón, E. (2001). Developing pragmatic competence in the academic setting: The case of suggestions in NS/NNS advising sessions. In S. Posteguillo, I. Fortanet & J. C. Palmer (Eds.), Methodology and new technologies in language for specific purposes (pp. 79-86). Castelló: Servei de Publicacions de la Universitat Jaume I.
2. Alcón, E. (2005). Does instruction work for learning pragmatics in the EFL context? SYSTEM, 33(3), 417-475.
3. Alcon, E., & Safont, P. (2001). Occurrence of exhortative speech acts in ELT materials and natural speech data: A focus on requst, suggestion and advice realisation strategies. Studies in English Language and Linguistics, 3, 5-22.
4. Altman, R. (1990). Giving and taking advice without offense. In R. C. Scarcella, E. S. Andersen & S. D. Krashen (Eds.), Developing communicative competence in a second language (pp. 95-99). New York: Newbury House.
5. Bacelar Da Silva, A. J. (2003). The effects of instruction on pragmatic development: Teaching polite refusals in English. Second Language Studies, 22(1), 55-106.
6. Bachman, F. L., & Palmer, S. A. (1982). The construct validation of some components of communicative proficiency. TESOL Quarterly, 16(4), 449-465.
7. Banerjee, J., & Carrell, P. L. (1988). Tuck in your shirt, you squid: Suggestions in ESL. Language Learning, 38(3), 313-364.
8. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1999). Exploring the interlanguage of interlanguage pragmatics: A research agenda for acquisitional pragmatics. Language Learning, 49(4), 677-713.
9. Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Hartford, B. A. S. (1993). Redefining the DCT: Comparing open questionnaire and dialogue completion tasks. In L. Bouton & Y. Kachru (Eds.), Pragmatics and language learning, vol. 4 (pp. 143-165). Urbana, IL: Division of English as an International Language Intensive English Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
10. Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Hartford, B. A. S. (1996). Input in an institutional setting. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 171-188.
11. Beebe, L. M., & Cummings, M. C. (1996). Natural speech act data versus written questionnaire data: How data collection method affects speech act performance. In S. M. Gass & J. Neu (Eds.), Speech acts across cultures (pp. 65-86). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
12. Beebe, L. M., Takahashi, T., & Uliss-Weltz, R. (1990). Pragmatic transfer in ESL refusals. In R. C. Scarcella, E. S. Andersen & S. D. Krashen (Eds.), Developing communicative competence in a second language (pp. 55-73). Rowley, MA: Newbury House Publishers.
13. Bialystok, E. (1982). On the relationship between knowing and using forms. Applied Linguistics, 3, 181-206.
14. Billmyer, K., & Varghese, M. (2000). Investigating instrument-based pragmatic variability: Effects of enhancing discourse completion tests. Applied Linguistics, 21(4), 517-552.
15. Boatman, D. (1987). A study of unsolicited advice. Penn Working Papers in Educational Linguistics, 3(1), 35-60.
16. Bodman, J., & Eisenstein, M. (1988). May God increase your bounty: The expression of gratitude in English by native and non-native speakers. Cross Currents, 15(1), 1-21.
17. Brown, R, & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Carr, T. H., & Curran, T. (1994). Cognitive factors in learning about structured sequences: Applications to syntax. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 205-230.
19. Celce-Murcia, M., Dörnyei, Z., & Thurrell, S. (1995). Communicative competence: A pedagogically motivated model with content specification, issues in Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 5-35.
20. Crookes, G. (1989). Planning and interlanguage variability. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 367-383.
21. Edmonson, W., & House, J. (1981). Let's talk and talk about it. A pedagogic interactional grammar of English. Munchen, Wien and Baltimore: Urban & Schwarzenberg.
22. Eichenbaum, H. (1997). Declarative memory: Insight from cognitive neurobiology. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 547-572.
23. Eisenstein, M., & Starbuck, R. (1989). The effect of emotional investment on L2 production. In S. Gass, C. Madden, D. Preston & L. Selinker (Eds.), Variation in second language acquisition: Volume 2. Psycholinguistic issues (pp. 46-64). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
24. Ellis, R. (1987). Interlanguage variability in narrative discourse: Style shifting in the use of the past tense. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 9, 1-20.
25. Ellis, R. (2004). The definition and measurement of L2 explicit knowledge. Language Learning, 54(2), 227-275.
26. Ellis, R. (2005). Principles of instructed language learning. SYSTEM, 33, 209-224.
27. Fukuya, Y. J., & Clark, M. K. (2001). A comparison of input enhancement and explicit instruction of mitigators. In L. Bouton (Ed.), Pragmatics and language learning, vol. 10 (pp. 111-130). Urbana, IL: Division of English as an International Language Intensive English Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
28. Fukuya, Y. J., & Zhang, Y. (2002). The effects of recasts on EFL learners' acquisition of pragmalinguistic conventions of request. Second Language Studies, 21(1), 1-47.
29. Gass, S. M. (1980). An investigation of syntactic transfer in adult L2 learners. In R. Scarcella & S. Krashen (Eds.), Research in second language acquisition (pp. 132-141). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
30. George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference, 11.0 update, 4th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
31. Golato, A. (2003). Studying compliment responses: A comparison of DCTs and recordings of naturally occurring talk. Applied Linguistics, 24(1), 90-121.
32. Hartford, B. A. S., & Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1992). Experimental and observational data in the study of interlanguage pragmatics. In L. Bouton (Ed.), Pragmatics and Language Learning, vol. 3 (pp. 33-52). Urbana, IL: Division of English as an International Language Intensive English Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
33. Hinkel, E. (1994). Appropriateness of advice as L2 solidarity strategy. RELC Journal, 25, 71-93.
34. Hinkel, E. (1997). Appropriateness of advice: DCT and multiple choice data. Applied Linguistics, 18(1), 1-26.
35. Houck, N., & Gass, S. M. (1996). Nonnative refusal: A methodological perspective. In S. M. Gass & J. Neu (Eds.), Speech acts across cultures (pp. 45-64). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
36. House, J. (1996). Developing pragmatic fluency in English as a foreign language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 225-253.
37. House, J., & Kasper, G. (1981). Politeness markers in English and German. In F. Coulmas (Ed.), Conversational Routine (pp. 157-185). The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton.
38. Hu, W., & Grove, C. (1991). Encountering the Chinese. Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.
39. Hulstijn, J. (2002). Towards a unified account of the representation, processing and acquisition of second language knowledge. Second Language Research, 18(3), 193-223.
40. Hulstijn, J. H., & Hulstijn, W. (1984). Grammatical errors as a function of processing constraints and explicit knowledge. Language Learning, 34(1), 23-43.
41. Jacoby L. L., & Brooks, L. R. (1984). Nonanalytic cognition: Memory, perception, and concept learning. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (pp. 1-47). New York: Academic Press.
42. Johnston, B., Kasper, G., & Ross. S. (1998). The effect of rejoinders in production questionnaires. Applied Linguistics, 19, 157-182.
43. Kasper, G. (2000). Data collection in pragmatics research. In H. Spencer-Oatey (Ed.), Culturally speaking (pp. 316-341). London, New York: Continuum.
44. Kasper, G., & Dahl, M. (1991). Research methods in interlanguage pragmatics. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13(2), 215-247.
45. Kasper, K., & Roever, C. (2005). Pragmatics in second language learning. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 317-334). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
46. Kasper, G., & Rose, K. R. (2002). Pragmatic development in a second language. Language Learning, Supplement 1, 52.
47. Kasper, G., & Schmidt, R. (1996). Developmental issues in interlanguage pragmatics. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(2), 149-169.
48. Kempen, G., & Hoenkamp, E. (1987). An incremental procedural grammar for sentence formation. Cognitive Science, 11, 201-258.
49. King, K. A., & Silver, R. E. (1993). "Sticking points": Effects of instruction on NNS refusal strategies. Working Papers in Educational Linguistics, 9, 47-82.
50. Koike, D. A. (1994). Negation in Spanish and English suggestions and requests: Mitigating effects? Journal of Pragmatics, 21, 513-526.
51. Koike, D. A. (1996). Transfer of pragmatic competence and suggestions in Spanish foreign language learning. In S. M. Gass & J. Neu (Eds.), Speech acts across cultures (pp. 257-281). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
52. Koike, D. A., & Pearson, L. (2005). The effect of instruction and feedback in the development of pragmatic competence. SYSTEM, 33(3), 481-501.
53. Levelt, W.J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
54. Liddicoat, A. J., & Crozet, C. (2001). Acquiring French interactional norms through instruction. In K. R. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 125-144). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55. Manza, L., & Reber, A. S. (1997). Representing artificial grammars: Transfer across stimulus forms and modalities. In D. Berry (Ed.), How implicit is implicit learning? (pp. 73-106). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
56. Martínez-Flor, A. (2004). The effect of instruction on the development of pragmatic competence in the English as a foreign language context: A study based on suggestions. Doctoral dissertation, Universitat Jaume I, Castellón, Spain.
57. Martínez-Flor, A. (2006). The effectiveness of explicit and implicit treatments on EFL learners' confidence in recognizing appropriate suggestions. In K. Bardovi-Harlig, C. Félix-Brasdefer & A. S. Omar (Eds.), Pragmatics Language Learning, vol. 11 (pp. 199-225). Honolulu, HI: National Foreign Language Resource Center, University of Hawai'i at Manoa.
58. Martínez-Flor, A., & Fukuya, Y. J. (2005). The effects of instruction on learner's production of appropriate and accurate suggestions. SYSTEM, 33(3), 463-480.
59. Matsumura, S. (2001). Learning the rules for offering advice: A quantitative approach to second language socialization. Language Learning, 51(4), 635-679.
60. Matsumura, S. (2003). Modelling the relationships among interlanguage pragmatic development, L2 proficiency, and exposure to L2. Applied Linguistics, 24(4), 465-491.
61. McLaughlin, B., & Heredia, R. (1996). Information-processing approaches to research on second language acquisition and use. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 213-229). San Diego: Academic Press.
62. Murphy, R. K., & Myors, B. (1998). Statistical power analysis: A simple and general model for traditional and modern hypothesis tests. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
63. Norris, J., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50(3), 417-528.
64. Rintell, E. (1979). Getting your speech act together: The pragmatic ability of second language learners. Working Papers on Bilingualism, 17, 97-106.
65. Rintell, E. M., & Mitchell, C. J. (1989). Studying requests and apologies: An inquiry into method. In J. H. S. Blum-Kulka & G. Kasper (Eds.), Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies (pp. 248-272). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
66. Rose, R. K. (1992). Speech acts and questionnaires: The effect of hearer response. Journal of Pragmatics, 17(1), 49-62.
67. Rose, R. K. (1994). On the validity of discourse completion tests in non-Western contexts. Applied Linguistics, 15(1), 1-14.
68. Rose, K. R. (2005). On the effects of instruction in second language pragmatics. SYSTEM, 33(3), 385-399.
69. Rose, K., & Kasper, G. (2001). Pragmatics in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
70. Rose, K. R., & Ng, C. K. (2001). Inductive and deductive teaching of compliments and compliment responses. In K. R. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 145-170). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
71. Rose, K., & Ono, R. (1995). Eliciting speech act data in Japanese: The effect of questionnaire type. Language Learning, 45(2), 191-223.
72. Safont, M. P. J. (2005). Third language learners. Pragmatic production and awareness. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
73. Safont, M. P, & Alcon, E. (2001). Elicitation instruments in analyzing the use of requestive strategies by foreign language learners of English. In E. González-Álvarez & A. Rollings (Eds.), Studies in Contrastive Linguistics. Proceedings of the 2nd International Contrastive Linguistics Conference (pp. 925-933). Santiago de Compostela, Spain: Servizo de Publicacións da Universidade de Santiago de Compostela.
74. Salaberry, M. R., & Lopez-Ortega, N. (1998). Accurate L2 production across language task: Focus on form, focus on meaning, and communicative control. Modern Language Journal, 82(4), 514-532.
75. Salazar, P. C. (2003). Pragmatic instruction in the EFL context. In A. Martinez-Flor, E. Usó &r A. Fernández (Eds.), Pragmatic competence and foreign language teaching (pp. 233-246). Castellón, Spain: Universitat Jaume I.
76. Sasaki, M. (1998). Investigating EFL students' production of speech acts: A comparison of production questionnaires and role plays. Journal of Pragmatics, 30, 457-484.
77. Schmidt, R. (1994). Deconstructing consciousness in search of useful definitions for applied linguistics. AILA Review, 11, 11-26.
78. Servan-Schreiber, E., & Anderson, J. R. (1990). Learning artificial grammars with competitive chunking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 592-608.
79. Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127-190.
80. Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
81. Takahashi, S. (2001). The role of input enhancement in developing pragmatic competence. In K. R. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 171-199). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
82. Takahashi, S. (2005). Noticing in task performance and learning outcomes: A qualitative analysis of instructional effects in interlanguage pragmatics. SYSTEM, 33(3), 437-461.
83. Takahashi, T. (1989). The influence of the listener on L2 speech. In S. Gass, C. Madden, D. Preston & L. Selinker (Eds.), Variation in second language acquisition: Discourse and pragmatics (pp. 245-279). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
84. Takimoto, M. (2006). The effects of explicit feedback on the development of pragmatic proficiency. Language Teaching Research, 10(4), 393-417.
85. Tarone, E. (1983). On the variability of interlanguage systems. Applied Linguistics, 4, 143-163.
86. Tarone, E. (1985). Variability in interlanguage use: A study of style-shifting in morphology and syntax. Language Learning, 35, 373-403.
87. Tarone, E. (1988). Variation in interlanguage. London: Edward Arnold.
88. Tarone, E. (1990). On variation in interlanguage: A response to Gregg. Applied Linguistics, 11, 392-400.
89. Tarone, E., & Parrish, B. (1988). Task-related variation in interlanguage: The case of articles. Language Learning, 38, 21-43.
90. Tateyama, Y. (2001). Explicit and implicit teaching of pragmatics routines: Japanese sumimosen. In K. R. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 200-222). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
91. Taylor, G. (2002). Teaching gambits: The effect of instruction and task variation on the use of conversation strategies by intermediate Spanish students. Foreign Language Annals, 35(2), 171-189.
92. Tomlin, R., & Villa, V. (1994). Attention in cognitive science and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16(2), 183-203.
93. Turnbull, W. (2001). An appraisal of pragmatic elicitation techniques for the social psychological study of talk: The case of request refusals. Pragmatics, 11(1), 31-61.
94. Verhoeven,L., & Vermeer, A. (1992). Modeling communicative second language competence. In L. Verhoeven & J. H. A. L. De Jong (Eds.), The construct of language proficiency (pp. 163-173). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamin Publishing Company.
95. Vokey, J. R., & Brooks, L. R. (1992). Salience of item knowledge in learning artificial grammars. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 328-344.
96. Wardhaugh, R. (1985). How conversation works. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
97. Wierzbicka, A. (1991). Cross-cultural pragmatics: The semantics of human interaction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
98. Wishnoff, R. J. (2000). Hedging your bets: L2 learners' acquisition of pragmatic devices in academic writing and computer-mediated discourse. Second Language Studies, 19, 119-157.
99. Yuan, F., & Ellis, R. (2003). The effects of pretask planning and on-line planning on fluency, complexity, and accuracy in L2 monologic oral production. Applied Linguistics, 24(1), 1-27.
100. Yuan, Y. (2001). An inquiry into empirical pragmatics data-gathering methods: Written DCTs, oral DCTs, field notes, and natural conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 271-292.
101. Yuan, Y. (2002). Compliments and compliment responses in Kunming Chinese. Pragmatics, 12(2), 183-226.
102. Zuengler, J. (1993). Explaining NNS interactional behavior: The effect of conversational topic. In G. Kasper & S. Blum-Kulka (Eds.), Interlanguage Pragmatics (pp. 184-195). Oxford: Oxford University Press.