Learner corpus analysis and the development of L2 pragmatic competence in networked intercultural language study: The case of German modal particles

Canadian Modern Language Review

Volumn 62, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 17-48

  Belz, Julie A ^a,b   Vyatkina, Nina ^b  

^a Department of Applied Linguistics and German ^*

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248700423     PISSN: 00084506     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3138/cmlr.62.1.17     Document Type: Review

References (66)

1. Abraham, W. (Ed.). (1991). Discourse particles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2. Altenberg, B., & Granger, S. (2001). The grammatical and lexical patterning of 'make' in native and non-native student writing. Applied Linguistics, 22, 173-194.
3. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1996). Pragmatics and language teaching: Bringing pragmatics and pedagogy together. In L. Bouton (Ed.), Pragmatics and language learning (pp. 21-39). Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois, Division of English as an International Language.
4. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1999). Exploring the interlanguage of interlanguage pragmatics: A research agenda for acquisitional pragmatics. Language Learning, 49, 677-714.
5. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2001). Empirical evidence of the need for instruction in pragmatics. In K. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 13-22). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Dörnyei, Z. (1998). Do language learners recognize pragmatic violations? Pragmatic versus grammatical awareness in instructed L2 learning. TESOL Quarterly, 32, 233-262.
7. Belz, J.A. (2004). Learner corpus analysis and the development of foreign language proficiency. System, 32, 577-591.
8. Belz, J.A. (2005). Learner corpus analysis and the development of L2 pragmatic competence in networked environments. A workshop presented at the 2005 Pragmatics & Language Learning Conference at Indiana University in Bloomington, IN.
9. Belz, J.A. (in press-a). Telecollaborative foreign language study: A personal overview of praxis and research. In D. Hiple & I. Thompson (Eds.), Proceedings of the Symposium on Foreign Language Distance Education and Distributed Learning. Honolulu: National Foreign Language Resource Center.
10. Belz, J.A. (in press-b). At the intersection of learner corpus research and telecollaboration: Considerations for language program direction. In J.A. Belz & S.L. Thorne (Eds.), Internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education. Boston: Heinle and Heinle.
11. Belz, J.A., & Kinginger, C. (2003). Discourse options and the development of pragmatic competence by classroom learners of German: The case of address forms. Language Learning, 53, 591-647.
12. Belz, J.A., Reinhardt, J., Hundley, L., Vyatkina, N., Rine, E., Carney, N., & Shrefler, N. (2005). Telekorp: The telecollaborative learner corpus of English and German. Manuscript submitted for publication.
13. Biscetti, S. (2004). Using corpus techniques to study pragmatic meaning: The case of bloody. In A. Partington, J. Morley, & L. Haarman (Eds.), Corpora and discourse (pp. 285-301). Bern: Peter Lang.
14. Chapelle, C. (2003). English language learning and technology: Lectures on applied linguistics in the age of information and communication technology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
15. Cheon-Kostrzewa, B., & Kostrzewa, F. (1997). Der Erwerb der deutschen Modalpartikeln. Ergebnisse aus einer Longitudinalstudie (I). Deutsch als Fremdsprache, 2, 86-92.
16. Cobb, T. (2003). Analyzing late interlanguage with learner corpora: Quebec replications of three European studies. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 59, 393-423.
17. Coniam, D. (2004). Concordancing oneself: Constructing individual textual profiles. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 9, 271-298.
18. DiDonato, R., Clyde, M., & Vansant, J. (2004). Deutsch, na klar! An introductory German course (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
19. Dippmann, G., & Watzinger-Tharp, J. (2000). A practical review of German grammar (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
20. Durrell, M. (2002). Using German: A guide to contemporary usage (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Götze, L. (1993). Modalpartikeln aus der Sicht der Sprachlehr-und Sprachlernforschung. Deutsch als Fremdsprache, 4, 227-232.
22. Granger, S. (1994). Learner corpus: A revolution in applied linguistics. English Today, 10(3), 25-29.
23. Granger, S. (Ed.). (1998). Learner English on computer. London: Longman.
24. Granger, S. (2002). A bird's-eye view of learner corpus research. In S. Granger, J. Hung, & S. Petch-Tyson (Eds.), Computer learner corpora, second language acquisition and foreign language teaching (pp. 3-33). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
25. Hall, J.K. (1995). 'Aw, man, where you goin'?': Classroom interaction and the development of L2 interactional competence. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 6, 37-62.
26. Harden, T., & Rösler, D. (1981). Partikeln und Emotionen -zwei vernachlässigte Aspekte des gesteuerten Fremdsprachenerwerbs. In H. Weydt (Ed.), Partikeln und Deutschunterricht: Abtönungspartikeln für Lerner des Deutschen (pp. 67-80). Heidelberg: Groos.
27. Hasselgren, A. (2002). Learner corpora and language testing: Smallwords as markers of learner fluency. In S. Granger, J. Hung, & S. Petch-Tyson (Eds.), Computer learner corpora, second language acquisition and foreign language teaching (pp. 143-173). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
28. Helbig, G. (1988). Lexikon deutscher Partikeln. Leipzig: Verlag Enzyklopädie.
29. Hentschel, E. (1986). Funktion und Geschichte deutscher Partikeln. Ja, doch, halt und eben. Tübingen, Germany: Niemeyer.
30. James, G. (2001). Cantonese particles in Hong Kong students' English e-mails. English Today, 17(3), 9-16.
31. Johns, T., & King, P. (Eds.). (1991). Classroom concordancing [Special issue]. English Language Research Journal, 4.
32. Kasper, G. (1996). Introduction: Pragmatics in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 145-148.
33. Kasper, G. (1997). Can pragmatic competence be taught? (NetWork #6). Honolulu: University of Hawai'i, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center. Retrieved August 20, 2004, from http://www.nflrc.hawaii.edu/NetWorks/ NW06/
34. Kasper, G. (2001a). Four perspectives on L2 pragmatic development. Applied Linguistics, 22, 502-530.
35. Kasper, G. (2001b). Classroom research on interlanguage pragmatics. In K. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 33-60). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36. Kasper, G., & Dahl, M. (1991). Research methods in interlanguage pragmatics. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 215-247.
37. Kasper, G., & Schmidt, R. (1996). Developmental issues in interlanguage pragmatics. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 149-169.
38. Kinginger, C., & Belz, J.A. (in press). Sociocultural perspectives on pragmatic development in foreign language learning: Microgenetic and ontogenetic case studies from telecollaboration and study abroad. Intercultural Pragmatics.
39. Kotthoff, H., & Cole, P. (1985). Modalpartikeln lernen wir nun wohl ja denn doch. Ein Playdoer für die Verbindung von Sprachreflexion und Spracherwerb. Zielsprache Deutsch, 16(1), 2-8.
40. Liddicoat, A.J., & Crozet, C. (2001). Acquiring French interactional norms through instruction. In K. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 125-144). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41. Lorenz, G. (1998). Overstatement in advanced learners' writing: Stylistic aspects of adjective intensification. In S. Granger (Ed.), Learner English on computer (pp. 53-66). London: Longman.
42. Matsumura, S. (2003). Modelling the relationships among interlanguage pragmatic development, L2 proficiency, and exposure to L2. Applied Linguistics, 24, 465-491.
43. Meunier, F. (2002). The pedagogical value of native and learner corpora in EFL grammar teaching. In S. Granger, J. Hung, & S. Petch-Tyson (Eds.), Computer learner corpora, second language acquisition and foreign language teaching (pp. 119-142). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
44. Moeller, J., Adolph, W., Mabee, B., & Berger, S. (2002). Kaleidoskop: Kultur, Literatur und Grammatik (6th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
45. Möllering, M. (2001). Teaching German modal particles: A corpus-based approach. Language Learning & Technology, 5(3), 130-151. Retrieved January 15, 2005, from http://llt.msu.edu/v015num3/mollering/default. html
46. Möllering, M., & Nunan, D. (1995). Pragmatics in interlanguage: German modal particles. Applied Language Learning, 6(1/2), 41-64.
47. Nesselhauf, N. (2004). Learner corpora and their potential for language teaching. In J. Sinclair (Ed.), How to use corpora in language teaching (pp. 125-152). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
48. Niezgoda, K., & Röver, C. (2001). Pragmatic and grammatical awareness: A function of the learning environment? In K. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 63-79). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
49. Ohta, A. (2001). A longitudinal study of the development of expression of alignment in Japanese as a foreign language. In K. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 103-120). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50. Ortega, L., & Iberri-Shea, G. (2005). Longitudinal research in second language acquisition: Recent trends and future directions. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 26-45.
51. Otto, K., von Schmidt, W., Goulding, C., & Jorth, C. (2003). Alles klar? An integrated approach to German language and culture (2nd ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.
52. Pravec, N. (2002). Survey of learner corpora. ICAME Journal, 26, 81-114.
53. Ragan, P. (2001). Classroom use of a systemic functional small learner corpus. In H. Ghadessy, A. Henry, & R. Roseberry (Eds.), Small corpus studies and ELT (pp. 207-236). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
54. Robinson, P. (1997). Generalizability and automaticity of second language learning under implicit, incidental, enhanced, and instructed conditions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 223-247.
55. Rose, K., & Kasper, G. (2001). Introduction. In K. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56. Rose, K., & Ng Kwai-fun, C. (2001). Inductive and deductive teaching of compliments and compliment responses. In K. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 145-170). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
57. Rösler, D. (1983). Der Erwerb von Abtönungspartikeln im institutionalisierten Lernprozeß. Deutsch als Fremdsprache. In H. Weydt (Ed.), Partikeln und Interaktion (pp. 291-300). Tübingen, Germany: Niemeyer.
58. Schmidt, R. (1993). Consciousness, learning, and interlanguage pragmatics. In G. Kasper & S. Blum-Kulka (Eds.), Interlanguage pragmatics (pp. 21-42). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
59. Scott, M. (2001). Comparing corpora and identifying key words, collocations, and frequency distributions through the WordSmith Tools suite of computer programs. In M. Ghadessy, A. Henry, & R. Roseberry (Eds.), Small corpus studies and ELT (pp. 47-67). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
60. Seidlhofer, B. (2002). Pedagogy and local learner corpora. In S. Granger, J. Hung, & S. Petch-Tyson (Eds.), Computer learner corpora, second language acquisition and foreign language teaching (pp. 213-234). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
61. Terrell, T., Tschirner, E., & Nikolai, B. (2000). Kontakte: A communicative approach (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
62. Thurmair, M. (1989). Modalpartikeln und ihre Kombinationen. Tübingen, Germany: Niemeyer.
63. Walther, J. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23, 3-43.
64. Weydt, H. (1969). Abtönungspatikel. Bad Homburg, Germany: Verlag Gehlen.
65. Weydt, H., Harden, T., Hentschel, H., & Rösler, D. (1983). Kleine deutsche Partikellehre. Stuttgart: Ernst Klett.
66. Widmaier, F., & Widmaier, E.R. (2002). Treffpunkt Deutsch, Grundstufe (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.