Teaching and assessing L2 pragmatics: What can we expect from learners?

Language Teaching

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 213-235

  Cohen, Andrew D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70350093052     PISSN: 02614448     EISSN: 14753049     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0261444807004880     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. Bardovi-Harlig K. (2001). Evaluating the empirical evidence: Grounds for instruction in pragmatics? In Rose K. R. & Kasper G. (eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 13–32.
2. Bardovi-Harlig K. (2006). On the role of formulas in the acquisition of L2 pragmatics. In Bardovi-Harlig, et al. (eds.), 1–28.
3. Bardovi-Harlig K., Félix-Brasdefer C. & Omar A. (eds.) (2006). Pragmatics and language learning (vol. 11). Honolulu, HI: National Foreign Language Resource Center, University of Hawaii at Manoa.
4. Bardovi-Harlig K. & Hartford B. S. (1993). Refining the DCT: Comparing open questionnaires and dialogue completion tasks. Pragmatics and language learning (vol. 4). Urbana-Champaign, IL: Division of English as an International Language, Intensive English Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 143–165.
5. Bardovi-Harlig K. & Hartford B. S. (eds.) (2005). Interlanguage pragmatics: Exploring institutional talk. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6. Bardovi-Harlig K. & Mahan-Taylor R. (eds.) (2003). Teaching pragmatics. Washington, DC: US Department of State. accessed 29/7/2007.
7. Beebe L. M. & Waring H. (2002). The pragmatics in the interlanguage pragmatics research agenda: The case of tone. Presented at AAAL Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, UT, 6–9 June 2002, Columbia Teachers College, Columbia University.
8. Belz J. A. (2002). Social dimensions of telecollaborative foreign language study. Language Learning and Technology 6.1, 60–81.
9. Belz J. A. (2003). Linguistic perspectives on the development of intercultural competence in telecollaboration. Language Learning and Technology 7.2, 68–99.
10. Belz J. A. (2004). Learner corpus analysis and the development of foreign language proficiency. System 32.4, 577–591.
11. Belz J. A. (2005). Learner corpus analysis and the development of L2 pragmatic competence in networked intercultural language study: The case of German modal particles. Canadian Modern Language Review 62, 17–48.
12. Belz J. A. & Thorne S. L. (eds.) (2006). Internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
13. Belz J. A. & Vyatkina N. (2005). Learner corpus analysis and the development of L2 pragmatic competence in networked intercultural language study: The case of German modal particles. Canadian Modern Language Review 62.1, 17–48.
14. Biesenbach-Lucas S. (2005). Communication topics and strategies in e-mail consultation: Comparison between American and international university students. Language Learning and Technology 9.2, 24–46.
15. Biesenbach-Lucas S. (2006). Making requests in e-mail: Do cyber-consultations entail directness? Toward conventions in a new medium. In Bardovi-Harlig, et al. (eds.), 81–107.
16. Boxer D. & Cohen A. D. (eds.) (2004). Studying speaking to inform second language learning. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
17. CLEAR (2007). Multimedia interactive modules for education and assessment (MIMEA). East Lansing, MI: Center for Language Education and Research, Michigan State University. accessed 22/7/2007.
18. Cohen A. D. (1996). Speech acts. In McKay S. L. & Hornberger N. H. (eds.), Sociolinguistics and language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 383–420.
19. Cohen A. D. (1997). Developing pragmatic ability: Insights from the accelerated study of Japanese. In Cook H. M., Hijirida K. & Tahara M. (eds.), New trends and issues in teaching Japanese language and culture (Technical Report #15). Honolulu, HI: Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center, University of Hawaii at Manoa, 137–163.
20. Cohen A. D. (2001). From L1 to L12: The confessions of a sometimes frustrated multiliterate. In Belcher D. & Connor U. (eds.), Reflections on multiliterate lives. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 79–95.
21. Cohen A. D. (2004). Assessing speech acts in a second language. In Boxer & Cohen (eds.), 302–327.
22. Cohen A. D. (2005). Strategies for learning and performing L2 speech acts. Intercultural Pragmatics 2.3, 275–301.
23. Cohen A. D. & Ishihara N. (2005). A web-based approach to strategic learning of speech acts. Minneapolis, MN: Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition (CARLA), University of Minnesota, 57 pp. accessed 22/7/2007.
24. Cohen A. D. & Olshtain E. (1981). Developing a measure of socio-cultural competence: The case of apology. Language Learning 31.1, 113–134.
25. Cohen A. D. & Shively R. L. (2002)/2003. Measuring speech acts with multiple rejoinder DCT's. Language Testing Update 32, 39–42.
26. Cohen A. D. & Sykes J. M. (2006). The development and evaluation of a self-access website for learning Spanish speech acts. Presented at the Annual Joint AAAL-ACLA/CAAL Conference, Montreal, Canada, 17 June 2006.
27. Cohen A. D. & Sykes J. M. (2007). Strategies, CMC, and learning pragmatics. Presented at 17th International Conference on Pragmatics and Language Learning, Honolulu, HI, 26–28 March 2007.
28. Cohen A. D. & Weaver S. J. (2006). Styles and strategies-based instruction: A teachers' guide. Minneapolis, MN: Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition, University of Minnesota.
29. Cook V. (1992). Evidence for multi-competence. Language Learning 42.4, 557–591.
30. Félix-Brasdefer J. C. (2002). Refusals in Spanish and English: A cross-cultural study of politeness strategies among speakers of Mexican Spanish, American English, and American learners of Spanish as a foreign language. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Minnesota.
31. Félix-Brasdefer J. C. (2006). Teaching the negotiation of multi-turn speech acts: Using conversation-analytic tools to teach pragmatics in the FL classroom. In Bardovi-Harlig, et al. (eds.), 167–197.
32. Félix-Brasdefer J. C. (2003). Validity in data collection methods in pragmatics research. In Kempchinsky P. & Piñeros C-E. (eds.), Theory, practice and acquisition. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 239–257.
33. Furstenberg G., Levet S., English K. & Maillet K. (2001). Giving a virtual voice to the silent language of culture: The CULTURA project. Language Learning and Technology 5.1, 55–102.
34. Gass S. M. & Houck N. (1999). Interlanguage refusals. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
35. Gass S. M. & Neu J. (eds.) (1996). Speech acts across cultures: Challenges to communication in a second language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
36. Golato A. (2003). Studying compliment responses: A comparison of DCTs and recordings of naturally occurring talk. Applied Linguistics 24.1, 90–121.
37. Hall J. K., Cheng A. & Carlson M. T. (2006). Reconceptualizing multicompetence as a theory of language knowledge. Applied Linguistics 27.2, 220–240.
38. Healy-Beauvois M. (1992). Computer assisted classroom discussion of the foreign language classroom: Conversation in slow motion. Foreign Language Annals 25.5, 455–464.
39. Hoven D. (1999). A model for listening and viewing comprehension in multimedia environments. Language Learning and Technology 3.1, 88–103.
40. Hudson T., Detmer E. & Brown J. D. (1994). Developing prototypic measures of cross-cultural pragmatics (Technical Report #7). Honolulu, HI: National Foreign Language Resource Center, University of Hawaii at Manoa.
41. Hurd S. (2000). Distance language learners and learner support: Beliefs, difficulties and use of strategies. Links and Letters 7, 61–80.
42. Hyte H. D. (2002). The effects of computer-based metacognitive strategy training for adult second language learners. M.A. thesis, Brigham Young University.
43. Ishihara N. (2006). Centering second language (SL) speakers' experience: A study of SL speakers' resistance to pragmatic norms of the SL communit. In Subjectivity, second/foreign language pragmatic use, and instruction: Evidence of accommodation and resistance. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Minnesota, 114–136.
44. Ishihara N. (2007 a). Tracing the development of teacher's knowledge about the instruction of L2 pragmatics: The effects of a summer institute. Presented at the AAAL Annual Conference, Costa Mesa, CA, 21–24 April 2007.
45. Ishihara N. (2007 b). Web-based curriculum for pragmatics Instruction in Japanese as a foreign language: An explicit awareness-raising approach. Language Awareness 16.1, 21–40.
46. Kasper G. (ed.) (1992). Pragmatics of Japanese as native and target language. Honolulu, HI: Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center, University of Hawaii Press.
47. Kasper G. (ed.) (1995). Pragmatics of Chinese as native and target language. Honolulu, HI: Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center, University of Hawaii Press.
48. Kasper G. (2000). Data collection in pragmatic research. In Spencer-Oatey H. (ed.), Culturally speaking: Managing rapport across cultures. London: Continuum, 316–341.
49. Kasper G. (2006). Speech acts in interaction: Towards discursive pragmatics. In Bardovi-Harlig, et al. (eds.), 281–314.
50. Kasper G. & Rose K. R. (2002). Pragmatic development in a second language. Oxford: Blackwell.
51. Kern R. (2006). Perspectives on technology in learning and teaching languages. TESOL Quarterly 40.1, 183–210
52. Kramsch C. & Andersen R. W. (1999). Teaching text and context through multimedia. Language Learning and Technology 2.2, 31–42.
53. LeLoup J. W. & Ponterio R. (2001). ON THE NET: Interactive and multimedia techniques in online language lessons – A sampler. Language Learning and Technology 7.3, 4–17.
54. LoCastro V. (2003). An introduction to pragmatics: Social action for language teachers. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
55. Márquez Reiter R. & Placencia M. E. (eds.) (2004). Current trends in the pragmatics of Spanish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
56. Márquez Reiter R. & Placencia M. E. (2005). Spanish pragmatics. Houndmill: Palgrave Macmillan.
57. Martínez Flor A., Usó Juan E. & Fernández Guerra A. (eds.) (2003). Pragmatic competence and foreign language teaching. Castelló de la Plana: Publicacions de la Universitat Jaume I.
58. McLean T. (2005). ‘Why no tip?’: Student-generated DCTs in the ESL classroom. In Tatsuki (ed.), 150–156.
59. McNamara T. & Roever C. (2006). Language testing: The social dimension. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 303–325.
60. Mey J. (1993). Pragmatics: An introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
61. Olshtain E. & Blum-Kulka S. (1985). Degree of approximation: Nonnative reactions to native speech act behavior. In Gass S. & Madden C. (eds.), Input in second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
62. Olshtain E. & Cohen A. D. (1983). Apology: A speech act set. In Wolfson N. & Judd E. (eds.), Sociolinguistics and language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 18–35.
63. Payne J. S. & Ross B. (2005). Working memory, synchronous CMC, and L2 oral proficiency devel-opment. Language Learning and Technology 9.1, 35–54.
64. Payne J. S. & Whitney P. J. (2002). Developing L2 oral proficiency through synchronous CMC: Output, working memory, and interlanguage development. CALICO 20.1, 7–32.
65. Pearson L. (2006). Teaching pragmatics in Spanish L2 courses: What do learners think? In Bardovi-Harlig, et al. (eds.), 109–134.
66. Roberts C., Byram M., Barro A., Jordan S. & Street B. (2001). Language learners as ethnographers. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
67. Roever C. (2004). Difficulty and practicality in tests of interlanguage pragmatics. In Boxer & Cohen (eds.), 283–301.
68. Rose K. R. (2005). On the effects of instruction in second language pragmatics. System 33.3, 385–399.
69. Rose K. R. & Kasper G. (eds.) (2001). Pragmatics in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
70. Salaberry R. (2000). Pedagogical design of computer mediated communication tasks: Learning objectives and technological capabilities. Modern Language Journal 84.1, 28–37.
71. Schauer G. A. & Adolphs S. (2006). Expressions of gratitude in corpus and DCT data: Vocabulary, formulaic sequences, and pedagogy. System 34.1, 119–134.
72. Siegal M. (1996). The role of learner subjectivity in second language sociolinguistic competency: Western women learning Japanese. Applied Linguistics 17.3, 356–382.
73. Sykes J. M. (2005). Synchronous CMC and pragmatic development: Effects of oral and written chat. CALICO 22.3, 399–432.
74. Sykes J. M. (2007). A dynamic approach to social interaction: SCMC, synthetic immersive environments & Spanish pragmatics. Ph.D. dissertation proposal, Department of Spanish & Portuguese, University of Minnesota.
75. Tatsuki D. (ed.) (2005). Pragmatics in language learning, theory, and practice. Tokyo: Pragmatics Special Interest Group of the Japan Association for Language Teaching.
76. Tatsuki D. & Nishizawa M. (2005). A comparison of compliments and compliment responses in television interviews, film, and naturally occurring data. In Tatsuki (ed.), 87–97.
77. Thatcher B. (2005). Situating L2 writing in global communication technologies. Computers and Composition 22.3, 279–295.
78. Thomas J. (1983). Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics 4.2, 91–112.
79. VanPatten B. (Producer). (1992). Destinos: An introduction to Spanish. Boston, MA: WGBH.
80. Varghese M. & Billmyer K. (1996). Investigating the structure of discourse completion tests. Working Papers in Educational Linguistics 12.1, 39–58.
81. Vásquez C. & Sharpless D. (2007). Preliminary findings from a nationwide survey on the role of pragmatics in the graduate TESOL curriculum. Ms., Department of World Languages, University of South Florida at Tampa.
82. Vyatkina N. & Belz J. A. (2006). A learner corpus-drive intervention for the development of L2 pragmatic competence. In Bardovi-Harlig, et al. (eds.), 315–357.
83. White C. J. (1999). The metacognitive knowledge of distance learners. Open Learning 14.3, 37–47.
84. White C. J. (2006). Distance learning of foreign languages. Language Teaching 39.4, 247–264.
85. Widjaja C. S. (1997). A study of date refusals: Taiwanese females vs. American females. University of Hawaii Working Papers in ESL 15.2, 1–43.
86. Wolfson N. (1989). Perspectives: Sociolinguistics and TESOL. Rowley, MA: Newbury House/Harper Collins.
87. Wolfson N. & Judd E. (eds.) (1983). Sociolinguistics and language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
88. Yamashita S. O. (1996). Six measures of JSL pragmatics (Technical Report #14). Honolulu, HI: Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center, University of Hawaii at Manoa.
89. Yule G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.