The effects of input-based tasks on the development of learners pragmatic proficiency

Applied Linguistics

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 1-25

  Takimoto, Masahiro ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 62649113998     PISSN: 01426001     EISSN: 1477450X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/applin/amm049     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Alco´ n, E. 2005. Does instruction work for learning pragmatics in the EFL context? System 33: 417435.
2. Craik, F. and R. Lockhart. 1972. Levels of processing: A framework for memory research, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 11: 67184.
3. DeKeyser, R. 1995. Learning second language grammar rules: An experiment with aminiature linguistic system, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 46/4: 61342.
4. Ellis, R. 1997. SLA Research and Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Ellis, R. 2003. Task-based Language Learning and Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. Fotos, S. 1994. Integrating grammar instruction and communicative language use through grammar consciousness-raising tasks, TESOL Quarterly 28: 32351.
7. Fotos, S. and R. Ellis. 1991. Communicating about grammar: A task-based approach, TESOL Quarterly 25: 60528.
8. Fukuya, Y. and M. Clark. 1999. Input enhancement of mitigators in L. Bouton (ed.): Pragmatics and Language Learning Monograph Series 10: 11130.Urbana-Champaign, IL: Division of English as an International Language, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
9. Fukuya, Y. and Y. Zhang. 2002. Effects of recasts on EFL learners acquisition of pragmalinguistic conventions of request, Second Language Studies 21/1: 147.
10. Hatch, E. and A. Lazaraton. 1991. The Research Manual: Design and Statistics for Applied Linguistics. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
11. Hill, T. 1997. The Development of Pragmatic Competence in an EFL Context. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Temple University, Japan.
12. House, J. 1996. Developing pragmatic fluency in English as a foreign language: Routines and metapragmatic awareness, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18/2: 22552.
13. Hudson, T., E. Detmer, and J. D. Brown. 1992. A Framework for Testing Cross-cultural Pragmatics (Technical Report #2). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.
14. Hudson, T., E. Detmer, and J. D. Brown. 1995. Developing Prototypic Measures of Cross-cultural Pragmatics (Technical Report #7). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.
15. Jeon, E. and T. Kaya. 2006. Effects of L2 instruction on interlanguage pragmatic development: A meta-analysis in J. Norris and L. Ortega (eds): Synthesizing Research on Language Learning and Teaching. Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 165211.
16. Kasper, G. 2001. Classroom research on interlanguage pragmatics in K. Rose andG.Kasper (eds): Pragmatics in Language Teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3360.
17. Kasper, G. and K. Rose. 2002. The role of instruction in learning second language pragmatics, Language Learning 52: 23773.
18. Koike, D. and L. Pearson. 2005. The effect of instruction and feedback in the development of pragmatic competence, System 33: 481501.
19. Leech, G. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
20. Lyster, R. 1994. The effect of functional-analytic teaching on aspects of French immersion students sociolinguistic competence, Applied Linguistics 15/3: 26387.
21. Martínez-Flor, A. and Y. Fukuya. 2005. The effects of instruction on learners production of appropriate and accurate suggestions, System 33: 46380.
22. Norris, J. and L. Ortega. 2001. Does type of instruction make a difference? Substantive findings from a meta-analytic review inR. Ellis (ed.): Form-focused instruction and second language learning, Language Learning 51 (Suppl. 1): 157213.
23. Robinson, P. 1996. Learning simple and complex second language rules under implicit, incidental, rule-search, and instructed conditions, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18/1: 2767.
24. Rose, K. 2005. On the effects of instruction in second language pragmatics, System 33: 41735.
25. Rose, K. and C. Ng. 2001. Inductive and deductive teaching of compliments and compliment responses in K. Rose and G. Kasper (eds.): Pragmatics in Language Teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 14570. Takahashi, S. 1996. Pragmatic transferability, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18/2: 22552.
26. Takahashi, S. 1998. Quantifying requestive imposition: Validation and selection of situation for L2 pragmatic research, Studies in Languages and Cultures 9: 13559.
27. Takahashi, S. 2001. The role of input enhancement in developing interlanguage pragmatic competence in K. Rose and G. Kasper (eds): Pragmatics in Language Teaching.
28. Takahashi, S. 2005. Noticing in task performance and learning outcomes: A qualitative analysis of instructional effects in interlanguage pragmatics, System 33: 43761.
29. Tateyama, Y. 2001. Explicit and implicit teaching of pragmatic routines: Japanese sumimasen inK. Rose and G. Kasper (eds.): Pragmatics in Language Teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 20022.
30. Tateyama, Y., G. Kasper, L. Mui, H. Tay, and O. Thananart. 1997. Explicit and implicit teaching of pragmatic routines in L. Bouton (ed.): Pragmatics and Language Learning, Monograph Series 8. Urbana-Champaign, IL: Division of English as an International Language, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, pp. 16378.
31. Thomas, J. 1983. Cross-cultural pragmatic failure, Applied Linguistics 4: 91112.
32. VanPatten, B. 1996. Input Processing and Grammar Instruction in Second Language Acquisition. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
33. VanPatten, B. and S. Oikkenon. 1996. Explanation versus structured input in processing instruction, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18/4: 495510.
34. Witten, C. 2000. Using video to teach for sociolinguistic competence in the foreign language classroom, Texas Papers in Foreign Language Education 5/1: 14375. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED468314.)