Amount of practice and pragmatic development of request-making in L2 Chinese

Language Learning and Language Teaching

Volumn 36, Issue , 2013, Pages 43-69

  Li, Shuai ^a  

^a GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85126864664     PISSN: 15699471     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1075/lllt.36.04li     Document Type: Chapter

References (49)

1. Ahmadian, M. J., & Tavakoli, M. (2010). The effects of simultaneous use of careful online planning and task repetition on accuracy, complexity, and fluency in EFL learners' oral production. Language Teaching Research, 15, 35-59.
2. Alcón-Soler, E. (2007). Fostering EFL learners' awareness of requesting through explicit and implicit consciousness-raising tasks. In M. del P. García Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp. 221-241). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
3. Anderson, J. R. (1993). Rules of the mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4. Belz, J., & Kinginger, C. (2003). Discourse options and the development of pragmatic competence by classroom learners of German: The case of address terms. Language Learning, 53, 591-647.
5. Belz, J. A., & Vyatkina, N. (2005). Learner corpus analysis and the development of L2 pragmatic competence in networked intercultural language study: The case of German modal particles. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 62, 17-48.
6. Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G., (1989). Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
7. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness - Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Bygate, M. (2001). Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of oral language. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Task-based learning: Language teaching, learning and assessment (pp. 23-48). London: Longman.
9. Chapelle, C. A. (2009). The relationship between second language acquisition theory and computer-assisted language learning. Modern Language Journal, 93, 741-753.
10. Cohen, A. D., & Ishihara, N. (2005). A web-based approach to strategic learning of speech acts. Minneapolis: Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition (CARLA), University of Minnesota. Retrieved from .
11. De Jong, N., & Perfetti, C. (2011). Fluency training in the ESL classroom: An experimental study of fluency development of proceduralization. Language Learning, 61, 522-568.
12. DeKeyser, R. (1996). Exploring automatization processes. TESOL Quarterly, 30, 349-357.
13. DeKeyser, R. (1997). Beyond explicit rule learning: Automatizing second language morphosyn-tax. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 195-221.
14. DeKeyser, R. (1998). Beyond focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 42-63). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
15. DeKeyser, R. (2007a). The future of practice. In R. DeKeyser (Ed.), Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology (pp. 287-304). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. DeKeyser, R. (2007b). Skill acquisition theory. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.). Theories in Second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 94-113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
17. DeKeyser, R. (2007c). Study abroad as foreign language practice. In R. DeKeyser (Ed.), Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology (pp. 208-226). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Fukuya, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2002). Effects of recasts on EFL learners' acquisition of pragmalinguistic conventions of request. Second Language Studies, 21, 1-47.
19. Garrett, N. (1991). Technology in the service of language learning: Trends and issues. Modern Language Journal, 75, 74-101.
20. Gatbonton, E., & Segalowitz, N. (2005). Rethinking communicative language teaching: A focus on access to fluency. Canadian Modern Language Review, 61, 325-353.
21. González-Lloret, M. (2008). Computer-mediated learning of L2 pragmatics. In E. Alcón-Soler & A. Martínez-Flor (Eds.), Investigating pragmatics in foreign language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 114-134). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
22. HSK Center. (2009). C. Test: A collection of authentic tests in 2008. Beijing Language and Culture University Press. (北京语言大学汉语水平考试中心（2009）《实用汉语水平认定考试2008年真题集》。北京：北京语言大学出版社。)
23. Jeon, E. H., & Kaya, T. (2006). Effects of L2 instruction on interlanguage pragmatic development. In J. M. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 165-211). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
24. Kagegawa, T. (2009). Development of the use of Japanese sentence-final particles through email correspondence. In N. Taguchi (Ed.), Pragmatic competence (pp. 301-333). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
25. Kondo, S. (2008). Effects on pragmatic development through awareness-raising instruction: Refusals by Japanese EFL learners. In E. Alcón-Soler & A. Martínez-Flor (Eds.), Investigating pragmatics in foreign language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 153-177). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
26. Lafford, B. (2009). Technology in the service of language learning: Update on Garrett (1991). Modern Language Journal Focus Issue, 93.
27. Li, S. (2007). A study of interlanguage pragmatic development of making requests by American learners of Chinese. Unpublished M.A. Thesis. Beijing Language and Culture University.
28. Li, S. (2011). Developing pragmatic competence in L2 Chinese: The effects of input-based and output-based practice and language aptitude factors. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. Carnegie Mellon University.
29. Li, S. (2012). The effects of input-based practice on pragmatic development of request in L2 Chinese. Language Learning, 62, 403-438.
30. Martínez-Flor, A., & Fukuya, Y. (2005). The effects of instruction on learners' production of appropriate and accurate suggestions. System, 33, 463-480.
31. Revolution (Media Version) (2009). [Computer software]. Edinburgh, UK: Runtime Revolution.
32. Ranta, L., & Lyster, R. (2007). A cognitive approach to improving immersion students' oral language abilities: The awareness-practice-feedback sequence. In R. DeKeyser (Ed.), Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology (pp. 141-160). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33. Schmidt, R. (1993). Consciousness, learning and interlanguage pragmatics. In G. Kasper & S. Blum-Kulka (Eds.), Interlanguage pragmatics (pp. 43-57). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
34. Sykes, J. (2005). Synchronous CMC and pragmatic development: Effects of oral and written chat. CALICO, 22, 399-432.
35. Sykes, J. (2009). Learner request in Spanish: Examining the potential of multiuser virtual environments for L2 pragmatics acquisition. In L. Lomika & G. Lord (Eds.), The second generation: Online collaboration and social networking in CALL (pp. 199-234). San Marcos, TX: CALICO.
36. Sykes, J. (2011). Teaching through multi-user virtual environments: User-driven design and implementation for language learning. In G. Vicenti & J. Braman (Eds.), Teaching through multi-user virtual environments: Applying dynamic elements to the modern classroom (pp. 283-305). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
37. Sykes, J., & Cohen, A. D. (2006). Dancing with words: Strategies for learning pragmatics in Spanish. Regents of the University of Minnesota. Retrieved from .
38. Taguchi, N. (2007). Development of speed and accuracy in pragmatic comprehension in English as a foreign language. TESOL Quarterly, 41, 313-338.
39. Taguchi, N. (2008a). Cognition, language contact, and the development of pragmatic comprehension in a study-abroad context. Language Learning, 58, 33-71.
40. Taguchi, N. (2008b). Pragmatic comprehension in Japanese as a foreign language. Modern Language Journal, 92, 558-576.
41. Taguchi, N. (2011a). Teaching pragmatics: Trends and issues. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 289-310.
42. Taguchi, N. (2011b). The effect of L2 proficiency and study-abroad experience on pragmatic comprehension. Language Learning, 61, 904-939.
43. Takahashi, S. (2001). The role of input enhancement in developing pragmatic competence. In K. R. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 171-199). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44. Takimoto, M. (2008). The effects of deductive and inductive Instruction on the development of language learners' pragmatic competence. The Modern Language Journal, 92, 369-386.
45. Takimoto, M. (2009). The effects of input-based tasks on the development of learners' pragmatic proficiency. Applied Linguistics, 30, 1-25.
46. The University of Iowa Chinese Program. (2004). Chinese Reading World. Retrieved from .
47. Thomas, J. (1995). Meaning in interaction: An introduction to pragmatics. London, UK: Longman.
48. Utashiro, T., & Kawai, G. (2009). Blended learning for Japanese reactive tokens: Effects of computer-led, instructor-led, and peer-based instruction. In N. Taguchi (Ed.), Pragmatic competence (pp. 275-299). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
49. Vyatkina, N., & Belz, J. (2006). A learner corpus-driven intervention for the development of L2 pragmatic competence. In K. Bardovi-Harlig, C. Felix-Brasdefer & A. Omar (Eds.), Pragmatics and Language Learning (pp. 315-357). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.