The effects of explicit feedback on the development of pragmatic proficiency

Language Teaching Research

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 393-417

  Takimoto, Masahiro ^a  

^a TEZUKAYAMA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845793046     PISSN: 13621688     EISSN: 14770954     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1191/1362168806lr198oa     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Allen, L. 2000: Form-meaning connections and the French causative: an experiment in processing instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 22: 69-84.
2. Bardovi-Harlig, K. and Dörnyei, Z. 1998: Do language learners recognize pragmatic violations? Pragmatic vs. grammatical awareness in instructed L2 learning. TESOL Quarterly 32: 233-59.
3. Bardovi-Harlig, K. and Hartford, B. 1996: Input in an institutional setting, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 17: 171-88.
4. Beebe, L., Takahashi, T. and Uliss-Weltz, R. 1990: Pragmatic transfer in ESL refusals. In Scarcella, R., Anderson, E. and Krashen S., editors, Developing communicative competence in a second language. Newbury House, 55-73.
5. Blum-Kulka, S., House, J. and Kasper, G. 1989: Cross-cultural pragmatics, requests and apologies. Ablex.
6. Carroll, S. and Swain, M. 1993: Explicit and implicit negative feedback: an empirical study of the learning of linguistic generalizations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15: 357-66.
7. Craik, F. and Lockhart, R. 1972: Levels of processing: a framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 11: 671-84.
8. Doughty, C. 2004: Commentary: When PI is focus on form it is very, very good, but when it is focus on forms ... In VanPatten, B. editor, Processing instruction. Erlbaum, 257-70.
9. Ellis, R. 1992: Learning to communicate in the classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 14: 1-23.
10. - 1997: SLA research and language teaching. Oxford University Press.
11. - 2003: Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.
12. Erlam, R. 2003: Evaluating the relative effectiveness of structured input and output-based instruction in foreign language learning: results from an experimental study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 25(4): 559-82.
13. Faerch, C. and Kasper, G. 1989: Internal and external modification in interlanguage request realization. In Blum-Kulka, S., House, J. and Kasper, G., editors, Cross-cultural pragmatics, requests and apologies. Albex, 221-47.
14. Hatch, E. and Lazaraton, A. 1991: The research manual, design and statistics for applied linguistics. Heinle & Heinle.
15. Hill, T. 1997: The development of pragmatic competence in an EFL context. PhD thesis. Temple University, Japan.
16. House, J. 1996: Developing pragmatic fluency in English as a foreign language: Routines and metapragmatic awareness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18: 225-52.
17. House, J. and Kasper, L. 1981: Zur rolle der kognition in kommunikationskursen [The role of cognition in communication courses]. Die Neueren Sprachen 80: 42-55.
18. - 1987: Interlanguage pragmatics: requesting in a foreign language. In Loerscher, W. and Schulze, R., editors, Perspectives on language in performance. Narr, 1250-88.
19. Hudson, T., Detmer, E. and Brown, J. 1992: A framework for testing cross-cultural pragmatics (Technical Report no. 2). University of Hawai'i Press.
20. - 1995: Developing prototypic measures of cross-cultural pragmatics (Technical Report no. 7). University of Hawai'i Press.
21. International Communication Incorporated 1996: TOEIC Friends 2: 37-41.
22. Jaccard, J. and Wan, C. 1996: Lisrel approaches to interaction effects in multiple regression. Sage.
23. Kim, S. 2001: Structured input and production practice in foreign/second language learning. PhD thesis. Temple University, Japan.
24. Kubota, M. 1995: Teachability of conversational implicature to Japanese EFL learners. IRLT Bulletin 9: 35-67.
25. Nagata, N. 1997: The effectiveness of computer-assisted metalinguistic instruction: a case study in Japanese. Foreign Language Annals 30(2): 187-200.
26. Pearson, L. 1998, October: Spanish L2 pragmatics, the effects of metapragmatic discussion. Paper presented at the Second Language Research Forum, University of Hawai'i, Manoa.
27. Rosa, E. 1999: A cognitive approach to task-based research: explicitness, awareness and L2 development. PhD thesis. Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
28. Samuda, V. 2001: Guiding relationships between form and meaning during task performance: the role of the teacher. In Bygate, M., Skehan, P. and Swain, M., editors, Researching pedagogic tasks, second language learning, teaching and testing. Longman, 119-40.
29. Sanz, C. 2004: Computer delivered implicit versus explicit feedback in processing instruction. In VanPatten, B., editor, Processing instruction. Erlbaum, 241-55.
30. Sharwood Smith, M. 1993: Input enhancement in instructed SLA: Theoretical bases. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15: 165-79.
31. Spada, N. and Lightbown, P. 1993: Instruction and the development of questions in L2 classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15: 205-24.
32. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (Version 10.0) [Computer software] 1998: SPSS.
33. Tabachnick, B. and Fidell, L. 1996: Using multivariate statistics, third edition. New York: HarperCollins.
34. Takahashi, S. 1998: Quantifying requestive imposition: validation and selection of situation for L2 pragmatic research. Studies in Languages and Cultures 9: 135-59. Institute of language and cultures, Kyushu University.
35. - 2001: The role of input enhancement in developing interlanguage pragmatic competence. In Rose K. and Kasper, G. editors, Pragmatics in language teaching. Cambridge University Press, 171-99.
36. Tanaka, T. 2001: Comprehension and production practice in grammar instruction: does their combined use facilitate second language acquisition? JALT Journal 23: 6-30.
37. Tateyama, Y., Kasper, G., Mui, L., Tay, H. and Thananart, O. 1997: Explicit and implicit teaching of pragmatic routines. In Bouton, L., editor, Pragmatics and language learning, monograph series 8: 163-78. Division of English as an International Language, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
38. Trahey, M. and White, L. 1993: Positive evidence and preemption in the second language classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15: 181-204.
39. VanPatten, B. 1991, July: Grammar instruction and input processing. Paper presented at the special colloquium on the Role of Grammar Instruction in Communicative Language Teaching, Concordia University and McGill University, Montreal.
40. - 1996: Input processing and grammar instruction in second language acquisition. Ablex.