Task complexity, learning opportunities, and Korean EFL learnersâ question development

Studies in Second Language Acquisition

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 627-658

  Kim, Y ^a  

^a GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84870002079     PISSN: 02722631     EISSN: 14701545     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0272263112000368     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Adams, R. (2007). Do second language learners benefit from interacting with each other? In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 29-51). Oxford : Oxford University Press.
2. Baralt, M. (2010). Task complexity, the cognition hypothesis and interaction in CMC and FTF environments. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
3. Bygate, M., Skehan, P., & Swain, M. (Eds )2001 Researching pedagogic tasks, second language learning, teaching and testing. London Longman.
4. Dörnyei, Z., & Tseng, W. (2009). Motivational processing in interactional tasks. In A. Mackey & C. Polio (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on interaction: Second language research in honor of Susan M. Gass (pp. 117-134). London : Routledge.
5. Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (Eds.). (1998). Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. New York : Cambridge University Press.
6. Duff, P. (1986). Another look at interlanguage talk: Taking task to task. In R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn (pp. 147-181). Rowley, MA : Newbury House.
7. Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
8. Gass, S. M., Mackey, A., & Ross-Feldman, L. (2005). Task-based interactions in classroom and laboratory settings. Language Learning, 55, 575-611.
9. Gass, S., & Selinker, G. (2008). Second language acquisition: An introductory course (3rd ed.). London : Routledge.
10. Gass, S. M., & Varonis, E. (1985). Task variation and non-native/non-native negotiation of meaning. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 149-161). Rowley, MA : Newbury House.
11. Gilabert, R. (2007). Effects of manipulating task complexity on self-repairs during L2 oral production. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 45, 215-240.
12. Gilabert, R., Barón, J., & Llanes, A. (2009). Manipulating cognitive complexity across task types and its impact on learners' interaction during oral performance. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 47, 367-395.
13. Haberman, S. (1973). The analysis of residuals in cross-classified tables. Biometrics, 29, 205-220.
14. Ishikawa, T. (2007). The effect of manipulating task complexity along the +/? dimension on L2 written narrative discourse. In M. P. Garcia Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp. 157-176). Bristol, UK : Multilingual Matters.
15. Jeon, K. S. (2007). Interaction-driven L2 learning: Characterizing linguistic development. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Interactional feedback and second language acquisition (pp. 379-403). Oxford : Oxford University Press.
16. Kim, Y. (2008). The contribution of collaborative and individual tasks to the acquisition of L2 vocabulary. Modern Language Journal, 92, 114-130.
17. Kim, Y. (2009 a). The effects of task complexity on learner-learner interaction. System, 37, 254-268.
18. Kim, Y. (2009 b). The role of task complexity and pair grouping on the occurrence of learning opportunities and L2 development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff.
19. Kuiken, F., Mos, M., & Vedder, I. (2005). Cognitive task complexity and second language writing performance. In S. Foster-Cohen, M. P. García-Mayo, & J. Cenoz (Eds.), Eurosla Yearbook (Vol. 5, pp. 195-222). Amsterdam : Benjamins.
20. Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2002). The effect of interaction in acquiring the grammar of a second language. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 343-358.
21. Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2007). Cognitive task complexity and linguistic performance in French L2 writing. In M. P. García-Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language settings (pp. 117-135). Bristol, UK : Multilingual Matters.
22. Lee, Y. (2002). Effects of task complexity on the complexity and accuracy of oral production in L2 Korean. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Hawai'i, Manoa.
23. Loewen, S., & Nabei, T. (2007). Measuring the effects of oral corrective feedback on L2 knowledge. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 361-378). Oxford : Oxford University Press.
24. Long, M. (1981). Input, interaction and second language acquisition. In H. Winitz (Ed.), Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences conference on native and foreign language acquisition (pp. 159-278). New York : New York Academy of Sciences.
25. Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of research on language acquisition (pp. 413-468). San Diego, CA : Academic Press.
26. Mackey, A. (1999). Input, interaction, and second language development: An empirical study of question formation in ESL. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 557-587.
27. Mackey, A. (2006). Feedback, noticing and second language development: An empirical study of L2 classroom interaction. Applied Linguistics, 27, 379-394.
28. Mackey, A., & Philp, J. (1998). Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts, responses, and red herrings? Modern Language Journal, 82, 338-356.
29. McDonough, K. (2005). Identifying the contributions of negative feedback and learners' responses to L2 development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 79-103.
30. McDonough, K., & Mackey, A. (2000). Form and meaning: Designing communicative tasks to target grammar in Thai classrooms. Foreign Language Annals, 33, 82-92.
31. McDonough, K., & Mackey, A. (2006). Responses to recasts: Repetitions, primed production, and linguistic development. Language Learning, 56, 693-720.
32. McDonough, K., & Sunitham, W. (2009). Collaborative dialogue between Thai EFL learners during self-access computer activities. TESOL Quarterly, 43, 231-254.
33. Michel, M., Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2007). The infl uence of complexity in monologic versus dialogic tasks in Dutch L2. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 45, 241-259.
34. Norris, J., & Ortega, L. (2003). Defining and measuring SLA. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 717-761). Oxford : Blackwell.
35. Nuevo, A. (2006). Task complexity and interaction: L2 learning opportunities and development . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
36. Philp, J. (2003). Constraints on "noticing the gap": Nonnative speakers' noticing of recasts in NS-NNS interaction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 99-126.
37. Philp, J., Oliver, R., & Mackey, A. (2006). The impact of planning time on children's taskbased interactions. System, 34, 547-565.
38. Pica, T., & Doughty, C. (1985). The role of group work in classroom second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7, 233-248.
39. Pica, T., Young, R., & Doughty, C. (1987). The impact of interaction on comprehension. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 737-758.
40. Pienemann, M., & Johnston, M. (1987). Factors infl uencing the development of language proficiency. In D. Nunan (Ed.), Applying second language acquisition research (pp. 45-141). Adelaide, Australia : National Curriculum Resource Centre.
41. Révész, A. (2009). Task complexity, focus on form, and second language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31, 437-470.
42. Révész, A. (2011). Task complexity, focus on L2 constructions, and individual differences: A classroom-based study. Modern Language Journal, 95, 162-181.
43. Robinson, P. (2001 a). Task complexity, cognitive resources and syllabus design: A triadic framework for examining task infl uences on SLA. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 287-318). New York : Cambridge University Press.
44. Robinson, P. (2001 b). Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, 22, 27-57.
45. Robinson, P. (2003). The cognition hypothesis, task design, and adult task-based language learning. Second Language Studies, 21, 45-105.
46. Robinson, P. (2005). Cognitive complexity and task sequencing: Studies in a componential framework for second language task design. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 43, 1-32.
47. Robinson, P. (2007 a). Criteria for classifying and sequencing pedagogic tasks. In M. P. Garcia-Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language settings (pp. 7-26). Bristol, UK : Multilingual Matters.
48. Robinson, P. (2007 b). Task complexity, theory of mind, and intentional reasoning: Effects on L2 speech production, interaction, uptake and perceptions of task difficulty. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 45, 193-213.
49. Robinson, P. (2009). Syllabus design. In M. H. Long & C. J. Doughty (Eds.), Handbook of second and foreign language teaching (pp. 294-310). Oxford : Blackwell.
50. Robinson, P. (2011). Task-based language learning: A review of issues. Language Learning, 61, 1-36.
51. Robinson, P., & Ellis, N. (2008). Conclusion: Cognitive linguistic, second language acquisition and L2 instruction-issues for research. In P. Robinson & N. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 489-545). London : Routledge.
52. Robinson, P., & Gilabert, R. (2007). Task complexity, the cognition hypothesis and second language learning and performance. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 45, 161-176.
53. Schoenberg, I. E. (2006). Focus on grammar: An integrated skills approach (3rd ed.). London : Longman.
54. Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
55. Skehan, P. (2003). Task-based language teaching. Language Teaching, 36, 1-14.
56. Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1999). The infl uence of structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings. Language Learning, 49, 93-120.
57. Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (2001). Cognition and tasks. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 183-205). New York : Cambridge University Press.
58. Spada, N., & Lightbown, P. (1993). Instruction and the development of questions in L2 classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 205-224.
59. Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honor of H. G. Widdowson (pp. 125-144). Oxford : Oxford University Press.
60. Swain, M. (1998). Focus on form through conscious refl ection. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 64-81). New York : Cambridge University Press.
61. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. Modern Language Journal, 82, 320-337.
62. Williams, J., & Evans, J. (1998). What kind of focus and on which forms? In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 139-155). New York : Cambridge University Press.