Molecular mechanisms of DNA replication checkpoint activation

Genes

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 147-175

  Recolin, Bénédicte ^a   van der Laan, Siem ^a   Tsanov, Nikolay ^b   Maiorano, Domenico ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF HUMAN GENETICS   (France)

^b INSTITUT DE GÉNÉTIQUE MOLÉCULAIRE DE MONTPELLIER   (France)

Author keywords

ATR; DNA damage; DNA replication fork arrest; DNA replication stress; Single stranded DNA

Indexed keywords

ATR PROTEIN; CYCLIN DEPENDENT KINASE; DNA; SINGLE STRANDED DNA;

CELL CYCLE PROGRESSION; CELL CYCLE REGULATION; CELL CYCLE S PHASE; DNA DAMAGE; DNA DAMAGE CHECKPOINT; DNA REPLICATION; DNA SYNTHESIS; G1 PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; HUMAN; NONHUMAN; REPLISOME; REVIEW; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; TRANSCRIPTION ELONGATION; TRANSCRIPTION TERMINATION;

EID: 84897513735     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20734425     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/genes5010147     Document Type: Review

References (180)

1. O'Donnell, M.; Langston, L.; Stillman, B. Principles and concepts of DNA replication in bacteria, archaea, and eukarya. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2013, doi: 10. 1101/cshperspect. a010108.
2. Li, Y.; Araki, H. Loading and activation of DNA replicative helicases: The key step of initiation of DNA replication. Genes Cells 2013, 18, 266-277.
3. Symeonidou, I. E.; Taraviras, S.; Lygerou, Z. Control over DNA replication in time and space. FEBS Lett. 2012, 586, 2803-2812.
4. Bell, S. P.; Dutta, A. DNA replication in eukaryotic cells. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2002, 71, 333-374.
5. Remus, D.; Beuron, F.; Tolun, G.; Griffith, J. D.; Morris, E. P.; Diffley, J. F. Concerted loading of Mcm2-7 double hexamers around DNA during DNA replication origin licensing. Cell 2009, 139, 719-730.
6. Evrin, C.; Clarke, P.; Zech, J.; Lurz, R.; Sun, J.; Uhle, S.; Li, H.; Stillman, B.; Speck, C. A double-hexameric MCM2-7 complex is loaded onto origin DNA during licensing of eukaryotic DNA replication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 20240-20245.
7. Fernandez-Cid, A.; Riera, A.; Tognetti, S.; Herrera, M. C.; Samel, S.; Evrin, C.; Winkler, C.; Gardenal, E.; Uhle, S.; Speck, C. An ORC/Cdc6/MCM2-7 complex is formed in a multistep reaction to serve as a platform for MCM double-hexamer assembly. Mol. Cell 2013, 50, 577-588.
8. Frigola, J.; Remus, D.; Mehanna, A.; Diffley, J. F. ATPase-dependent quality control of DNA replication origin licensing. Nature 2013, 495, 339-343.
9. McGarry, T. J.; Kirschner, M. W. Geminin, an inhibitor of DNA replication, is degraded during mitosis. Cell 1998, 93, 1043-1053.
10. Tada, S.; Li, A.; Maiorano, D.; Mechali, M.; Blow, J. J. Repression of origin assembly in metaphase depends on inhibition of RLF-B/Cdt1 by geminin. Nat. Cell Biol. 2001, 3, 107-113.
11. Wohlschlegel, J. A.; Dwyer, B. T.; Dhar, S. K.; Cvetic, C.; Walter, J. C.; Dutta, A. Inhibition of eukaryotic DNA replication by geminin binding to cdt1. Science 2000, 290, 2309-2312.
12. Lutzmann, M.; Maiorano, D.; Mechali, M. Identification of full genes and proteins of MCM9, a novel, vertebrate-specific member of the MCM2-8 protein family. Gene 2005, 362, 51-56.
13. Lutzmann, M.; Mechali, M. MCM9 binds Cdt1 and is required for the assembly of prereplication complexes. Mol. Cell 2008, 31, 190-200.
14. Gambus, A.; Blow, J. J. Mcm8 and Mcm9 form a dimeric complex in Xenopus laevis egg extract that is not essential for DNA replication initiation. Cell Cycle 2013, 12, 1225-1232.
15. Lutzmann, M.; Grey, C.; Traver, S.; Ganier, O.; Maya-Mendoza, A.; Ranisavljevic, N.; Bernex, F.; Nishiyama, A.; Montel, N.; Gavois, E.; et al. MCM8-and MCM9-deficient mice reveal gametogenesis defects and genome instability due to impaired homologous recombination. Mol. Cell 2012, 47, 523-534.
16. Park, J.; Long, D. T.; Lee, K. Y.; Abbas, T.; Shibata, E.; Negishi, M.; Luo, Y.; Schimenti, J. C.; Gambus, A.; Walter, J. C.; et al. The MCM8-MCM9 complex promotes RAD51 recruitment at DNA damage sites to facilitate homologous recombination. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2013, 33, 1632-1644.
17. Nishimura, K.; Ishiai, M.; Horikawa, K.; Fukagawa, T.; Takata, M.; Takisawa, H.; Kanemaki, M. T. Mcm8 and Mcm9 form a complex that functions in homologous recombination repair induced by DNA interstrand crosslinks. Mol. Cell 2012, 47, 511-522.
18. Mendez, J.; Stillman, B. Perpetuating the double helix: Molecular machines at eukaryotic DNA replication origins. Bioessays 2003, 25, 1158-1167.
19. Mimura, S.; Takisawa, H. Xenopus Cdc45-dependent loading of DNA polymerase alpha onto chromatin under the control of S-phase Cdk. EMBO J. 1998, 17, 5699-5707.
20. Mimura, S.; Masuda, T.; Matsui, T.; Takisawa, H. Central role for cdc45 in establishing an initiation complex of DNA replication in Xenopus egg extracts. Genes Cells 2000, 5, 439-452.
21. Walter, J.; Newport, J. Initiation of eukaryotic DNA replication: Origin unwinding and sequential chromatin association of Cdc45, RPA, and DNA polymerase alpha. Mol. Cell 2000, 5, 617-627.
22. MacNeill, S. A. Structure and function of the GINS complex, a key component of the eukaryotic replisome. Biochem. J. 2010, 425, 489-500.
23. Costa, A.; Ilves, I.; Tamberg, N.; Petojevic, T.; Nogales, E.; Botchan, M. R.; Berger, J. M. The structural basis for MCM2-7 helicase activation by GINS and Cdc45. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2010, 18, 471-477.
24. Sheu, Y. J.; Stillman, B. The Dbf4-Cdc7 kinase promotes S phase by alleviating an inhibitory activity in Mcm4. Nature 2010, 463, 113-117.
25. Randell, J. C.; Fan, A.; Chan, C.; Francis, L. I.; Heller, R. C.; Galani, K.; Bell, S. P. Mec1 is one of multiple kinases that prime the Mcm2-7 helicase for phosphorylation by Cdc7. Mol. Cell 2010, 40, 353-363.
26. Tanaka, S.; Umemori, T.; Hirai, K.; Muramatsu, S.; Kamimura, Y.; Araki, H. CDK-dependent phosphorylation of Sld2 and Sld3 initiates DNA replication in budding yeast. Nature 2007, 445, 328-332.
27. Zegerman, P.; Diffley, J. F. Phosphorylation of Sld2 and Sld3 by cyclin-dependent kinases promotes DNA replication in budding yeast. Nature 2007, 445, 281-285.
28. Heller, R. C.; Kang, S.; Lam, W. M.; Chen, S.; Chan, C. S.; Bell, S. P. Eukaryotic origin-dependent DNA replication in vitro reveals sequential action of DDK and S-CDK kinases. Cell 2011, 146, 80-91.
29. Muramatsu, S.; Hirai, K.; Tak, Y. S.; Kamimura, Y.; Araki, H. CDK-dependent complex formation between replication proteins Dpb11, Sld2, Pol (epsilon}, and GINS in budding yeast. Genes Dev. 2010, 24, 602-612.
30. Tanaka, T.; Umemori, T.; Endo, S.; Muramatsu, S.; Kanemaki, M.; Kamimura, Y.; Obuse, C.; Araki, H. Sld7, an Sld3-associated protein required for efficient chromosomal DNA replication in budding yeast. EMBO J. 2011, 30, 2019-2030.
31. Natsume, T.; Muller, C. A.; Katou, Y.; Retkute, R.; Gierlinski, M.; Araki, H.; Blow, J. J.; Shirahige, K.; Nieduszynski, C. A.; Tanaka, T. U. Kinetochores coordinate pericentromeric cohesion and early DNA replication by Cdc7-Dbf4 kinase recruitment. Mol. Cell 2013, 50, 661-674.
32. Dorneiter, I.; Erdile, L. F.; Gilbert, I. U.; von Winkler, D.; Kelly, T. J.; Fanning, E. Interaction of DNA polymerase a-primase with cellular replication protein A and SV40 T antigen. EMBO 1992, 11, 769-776.
33. Jiang, X.; Klimovich, V.; Arunkumar, A. I.; Hysinger, E. B.; Wang, Y.; Ott, R. D.; Guler, G. D.; Weiner, B.; Chazin, W. J.; Fanning, E. Structural mechanism of RPA loading on DNA during activation of a simple pre-replication complex. EMBO J. 2006, 25, 5516-5526.
34. Waga, S.; Stillman, B. The DNA replication fork in eukaryotic cells. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1998, 67, 721-751.
35. Pursell, Z. F.; Isoz, I.; Lundstrom, E. B.; Johansson, E.; Kunkel, T. A. Yeast DNA polymerase epsilon participates in leading-strand DNA replication. Science 2007, 317, 127-130.
36. Shikata, K.; Sasa-Masuda, T.; Okuno, Y.; Waga, S.; Sugino, A. The DNA polymerase activity of Pol epsilon holoenzyme is required for rapid and efficient chromosomal DNA replication in Xenopus egg extracts. BMC Biochem. 2006, 7, 21.
37. Stillman, B. DNA polymerases at the replication fork in eukaryotes. Mol. Cell 2008, 30, 259-260.
38. Maiorano, D.; Cuvier, O.; Danis, E.; Mechali, M. MCM8 is an MCM2-7-related protein that functions as a DNA helicase during replication elongation and not initiation. Cell 2005, 120, 315-328.
39. Crevel, G.; Hashimoto, R.; Vass, S.; Sherkow, J.; Yamaguchi, M.; Heck, M. M.; Cotterill, S. Differential requirements for MCM proteins in DNA replication in Drosophila S2 cells. PLoS One 2007, 2, e833.
40. Gozuacik, D.; Chami, M.; Lagorce, D.; Faivre, J.; Murakami, Y.; Poch, O.; Biermann, E.; Knippers, R.; Brechot, C.; Paterlini-Brechot, P. Identification and functional characterization of a new member of the human Mcm protein family: hMcm8. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31, 570-579.
41. Huberman, J. A.; Riggs, A. D. Autoradiography of chromosomal DNA fibers from Chinese hamster cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1966, 55, 599-606.
42. Sarkies, P.; Sale, J. E. Cellular epigenetic stability and cancer. Trends Genet. 2012, 28, 118-127.
43. Mechali, M. DNA replication origins: From sequence specificity to epigenetics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2001, 2, 640-645.
44. Nishiyama, A.; Frappier, L.; Mechali, M. MCM-BP regulates unloading of the MCM2-7 helicase in late S phase. Genes Dev. 2011, 25, 165-175.
45. Rao, P. N.; Johnson, R. T. Mammalian cell fusion: Studies on the regulation of DNA synthesis and mitosis. Nature 1970, 225, 159-164.
46. Blow, J. J.; Laskey, R. A role for the nuclear envelope in controlling DNA replication within the cell cycle. Nature 1988, 332, 546-548.
47. Chong, J. P.; Mahbubani, H. M.; Khoo, C.-Y.; Blow, J. J. Purification of an MCM-containing complex as a component of the DNA replication licensing system. Nature 1995, 375, 418-421.
48. Cocker, J. H.; Piatti, S.; Santocanale, C.; Nasmyth, K.; Diffley, J. F. X. An essential role for the Cdc6 protein in forming the pre-replicative complexes of budding yeast. Nature 1996, 379, 180-182.
49. Tada, S. Cdt1 and geminin: Role during cell cycle progression and DNA damage in higher eukaryotes. Front. Biosci. 2007, 12, 1629-1641.
50. Ballabeni, A.; Zamponi, R.; Moore, J. K.; Helin, K.; Kirschner, M. W. Geminin deploys multiple mechanisms to regulate Cdt1 before cell division thus ensuring the proper execution of DNA replication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, E2848-E2853.
51. Maiorano, D.; Moreau, J.; Mechali, M. XCDT1 is required for the assembly of pre-replicative complexes in Xenopus laevis. Nature 2000, 404, 622-625.
52. Rialland, M.; Sola, F.; Santocanale, C. Essential role of human CDT1 in DNA replication and chromatin licensing. J. Cell Sci. 2002, 115, 1435-1440.
53. Nishitani, H.; Taraviras, S.; Lygerou, Z.; Nishimoto, T. The human licensing factor for DNA replication Cdt1 accumulates in G1 and is destabilized after initiation of S-phase. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 44905-44911.
54. Arias, E. E.; Walter, J. C. PCNA functions as a molecular platform to trigger Cdt1 destruction and prevent re-replication. Nat. Cell Biol. 2006, 8, 84-90.
55. Maiorano, D.; Krasinska, L.; Lutzmann, M.; Mechali, M. Recombinant Cdt1 induces rereplication of G2 nuclei in Xenopus egg extracts. Curr. Biol. 2005, 15, 146-153.
56. Li, A.; Blow, J. J. Cdt1 downregulation by proteolysis and geminin inhibition prevents DNA re-replication in Xenopus. EMBO J. 2005, 24, 395-404.
57. Arias, E. E.; Walter, J. C. Replication-dependent destruction of Cdt1 limits DNA replication to a single round per cell cycle in Xenopus egg extracts. Genes Dev. 2005, 19, 114-126.
58. Yoshida, K.; Takisawa, H.; Kubota, Y. Intrinsic nuclear import activity of geminin is essential to prevent re-initiation of DNA replication in Xenopus eggs. Genes Cells 2005, 10, 63-73.
59. Lutzmann, M.; Maiorano, D.; Mechali, M. A Cdt1-geminin complex licenses chromatin for DNA replication and prevents rereplication during S phase in Xenopus. EMBO J. 2006, 25, 5764-5774.
60. Vaziri, C.; Saxena, S.; Jeon, Y.; Lee, C.; Murata, K.; Machida, Y.; Wagle, N.; Hwang, D. S.; Dutta, A. A p53-dependent checkpoint pathway prevents rereplication. Mol. Cell 2003, 11, 997-1008.
61. Labib, K.; Diffley, J. F.; Kearsey, S. E. G1-phase and B-type cyclins exclude the DNA-replication factor Mcm4 from the nucleus. Nat. Cell Biol. 1999, 1, 415-422.
62. Nishitani, H.; Lygerou, Z.; Nishimoto, T.; Nurse, P. The Cdt1 protein is required to license DNA for replication in fission yeast. Nature 2000, 404, 625-628.
63. Uhlmann, F.; Bouchoux, C.; Lopez-Aviles, S. A quantitative model for cyclin-dependent kinase control of the cell cycle: Revisited. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2011, 366, 3572-3583.
64. Starostina, N. G.; Kipreos, E. T. Multiple degradation pathways regulate versatile CIP/KIP CDK inhibitors. Trends Cell Biol. 2011, 22, 33-41.
65. Santamaria, D.; Barriere, C.; Cerqueira, A.; Hunt, S.; Tardy, C.; Newton, K.; Caceres, J. F.; Dubus, P.; Malumbres, M.; Barbacid, M. Cdk1 is sufficient to drive the mammalian cell cycle. Nature 2007, 448, 811-815.
66. Fisher, D.; Nurse, P. A single fission yeast mitotic cyclin B-p34cdc2 kinase promotes both S-phase and mitosis in the absence of G1-cyclins. EMBO J. 1996, 15, 850-860.
67. Sansam, C. L.; Cruz, N. M.; Danielian, P. S.; Amsterdam, A.; Lau, M. L.; Hopkins, N.; Lees, J. A. A vertebrate gene, ticrr, is an essential checkpoint and replication regulator. Genes Dev. 2010, 24, 183-194.
68. Kumagai, A.; Shevchenko, A.; Dunphy, W. G. Treslin collaborates with TopBP1 in triggering the initiation of DNA replication. Cell 2010, 140, 349-359.
69. Balestrini, A.; Cosentino, C.; Errico, A.; Garner, E.; Costanzo, V. GEMC1 is a TopBP1-interacting protein required for chromosomal DNA replication. Nat. Cell Biol. 2010, 12, 484-491.
70. Wang, Z.; Kim, E.; Leffak, M.; Xu, Y. J. Treslin, DUE-B, and GEMC1 cannot complement Sld3 mutants in fission yeast. FEMS Yeast Res. 2012, 12, 486-490.
71. Stern, B.; Nurse, P. A quantitative model for the cdc2 control of S phase and mitosis in fission yeast. Trends Genet. 1996, 12, 345-350.
72. Koundrioukoff, S.; Jonsson, Z. O.; Hasan, S.; de Jong, R. N.; van der Vliet, P. C.; Hottiger, M. O.; Hubscher, U. A direct interaction between proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and Cdk2 targets PCNA-interacting proteins for phosphorylation. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 22882-22887.
73. Hartwell, L. H.; Weinert, T. A. Checkpoints: Controls that ensure the order of cell cycle events. Science 1989, 246, 629-634.
74. Symington, L. S.; Gautier, J. Double-strand break end resection and repair pathway choice. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2011, 45, 247-271.
75. Lambert, S.; Carr, A. M. Checkpoint responses to replication fork barriers. Biochimie 2005, 87, 591-602.
76. Rupp, W. D.; Howard-Flanders, P. Discontinuities in the DNA synthesized in an excision-defective strain of Escherichia coli following ultraviolet irradiation. J. Mol. Biol. 1968, 31, 291-304.
77. Pages, V.; Fuchs, R. P. Uncoupling of leading-and lagging-strand DNA replication during lesion bypass in vivo. Science 2003, 300, 1300-1303.
78. Ciccia, A.; Elledge, S. J. The DNA damage response: Making it safe to play with knives. Mol. Cell 2010, 40, 179-204.
79. Matsuoka, S.; Ballif, B. A.; Smogorzewska, A.; McDonald, E. R., 3rd; Hurov, K. E.; Luo, J.; Bakalarski, C. E.; Zhao, Z.; Solimini, N.; Lerenthal, Y.; et al. ATM and ATR substrate analysis reveals extensive protein networks responsive to DNA damage. Science 2007, 316, 1160-1166.
80. Brown, E. J.; Baltimore, D. ATR disruption leads to chromosomal fragmentation and early embryonic lethality. Genes Dev. 2000, 14, 397-402.
81. De Klein, A.; Muijtjens, M.; van Os, R.; Verhoeven, Y.; Smit, B.; Carr, A. M.; Lehmann, A. R.; Hoeijmakers, J. H. Targeted disruption of the cell-cycle checkpoint gene ATR leads to early embryonic lethality in mice. Curr. Biol. 2000, 10, 479-482.
82. Daniel, J. A.; Pellegrini, M.; Lee, B. S.; Guo, Z.; Filsuf, D.; Belkina, N. V.; You, Z.; Paull, T. T.; Sleckman, B. P.; Feigenbaum, L.; et al. Loss of ATM kinase activity leads to embryonic lethality in mice. J. Cell Biol. 2012, 198, 295-304.
83. Yamamoto, K.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, W.; Liu, X.; Dubois, R. L.; Lin, C. S.; Ludwig, T.; Bakkenist, C. J.; Zha, S. Kinase-dead ATM protein causes genomic instability and early embryonic lethality in mice. J. Cell Biol. 2012, 198, 305-313.
84. Zegerman, P.; Diffley, J. F. Checkpoint-dependent inhibition of DNA replication initiation by Sld3 and Dbf4 phosphorylation. Nature 2010, 467, 474-478.
85. Mailand, N.; Falck, J.; Lukas, C.; Syljuasen, R. G.; Welcker, M.; Bartek, J.; Lukas, J. Rapid destruction of human Cdc25A in response to DNA damage. Science 2000, 288, 1425-1429.
86. Costanzo, V.; Robertson, K.; Ying, C. Y.; Kim, E.; Avvedimento, E.; Gottesman, M.; Grieco, D.; Gautier, J. Reconstitution of an ATM-dependent checkpoint that inhibits chromosomal DNA replication following DNA damage. Mol. Cell 2000, 6, 649-659.
87. Tsuji, T.; Lau, E.; Chiang, G. G.; Jiang, W. The role of Dbf4/Drf1-dependent kinase Cdc7 in DNA-damage checkpoint control. Mol. Cell 2008, 32, 862-869.
88. Lee, A. Y.; Chiba, T.; Truong, L. N.; Cheng, A. N.; Do, J.; Cho, M. J.; Chen, L.; Wu, X. Dbf4 is direct downstream target of ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) and ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR) protein to regulate intra-S-phase checkpoint. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 2531-2543.
89. Byun, T. S.; Pacek, M.; Yee, M. C.; Walter, J. C.; Cimprich, K. A. Functional uncoupling of MCM helicase and DNA polymerase activities activates the ATR-dependent checkpoint. Genes Dev. 2005, 19, 1040-1052.
90. Sogo, J. M.; Lopes, M.; Foiani, M. Fork reversal and ssDNA accumulation at stalled replication forks owing to checkpoint defects. Science 2002, 297, 599-602.
91. Lonn, U.; Lonn, S. Extensive regions of single-stranded DNA in aphidicolin-treated melanoma cells. Biochemistry 1988, 27, 566-570.
92. Gobbini, E.; Cesena, D.; Galbiati, A.; Lockhart, A.; Longhese, M. P. Interplays between ATM/Tel1 and ATR/Mec1 in sensing and signaling DNA double-strand breaks. DNA Repair 2013, 12, 791-799.
93. D'Amours, D.; Jackson, S. P. The Mre11 complex: At the crossroads of dna repair and checkpoint signalling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2002, 3, 317-327.
94. Willis, J.; Patel, Y.; Lentz, B. L.; Yan, S. APE2 is required for ATR-Chk1 checkpoint activation in response to oxidative stress. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 10592-10597.
95. Gamper, A. M.; Choi, S.; Matsumoto, Y.; Banerjee, D.; Tomkinson, A. E.; Bakkenist, C. J. ATM protein physically and functionally interacts with proliferating cell nuclear antigen to regulate DNA synthesis. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 12445-12454.
96. Costanzo, V.; Shechter, D.; Lupardus, P. J.; Cimprich, K. A.; Gottesman, M.; Gautier, J. An ATR-and Cdc7-dependent DNA damage checkpoint that inhibits initiation of DNA replication. Mol. Cell 2003, 11, 203-213.
97. Zou, L.; Liu, D.; Elledge, S. J. Replication protein A-mediated recruitment and activation of Rad17 complexes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 13827-13832.
98. Ball, H. L.; Myers, J. S.; Cortez, D. ATRIP binding to replication protein A-single-stranded DNA promotes ATR-ATRIP localization but is dispensable for Chk1 phosphorylation. Mol. Biol. Cell 2005, 16, 2372-2381.
99. Cortez, D.; Guntuku, S.; Qin, J.; Elledge, S. J. ATR and ATRIP: Partners in checkpoint signaling. Science 2001, 294, 1713-1716.
100. Dart, D. A.; Adams, K. E.; Akerman, I.; Lakin, N. D. Recruitment of the cell cycle checkpoint kinase ATR to chromatin during S-phase. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 16433-16440.
101. Recolin, B.; van der Laan, S.; Maiorano, D. Role of replication protein A as sensor in activation of the S-phase checkpoint in Xenopus egg extracts. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, 3431-3442.
102. Dodson, G. E.; Shi, Y.; Tibbetts, R. S. DNA replication defects, spontaneous DNA damage, and ATM-dependent checkpoint activation in replication protein A-deficient cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 34010-34014.
103. Lucca, C.; Vanoli, F.; Cotta-Ramusino, C.; Pellicioli, A.; Liberi, G.; Haber, J.; Foiani, M. Checkpoint-mediated control of replisome-fork association and signalling in response to replication pausing. Oncogene 2004, 23, 1206-1213.
104. Zou, L.; Elledge, S. J. Sensing DNA damage through ATRIP recognition of RPA-ssDNA complexes. Science 2003, 300, 1542-1548.
105. Ashton, N. W.; Bolderson, E.; Cubeddu, L.; O'Byrne, K. J.; Richard, D. J. Human single-stranded DNA binding proteins are essential for maintaining genomic stability. BMC Mol. Biol. 2013, 14, 9.
106. Wang, Y.; Putnam, C. D.; Kane, M. F.; Zhang, W.; Edelmann, L.; Russell, R.; Carrion, D. V.; Chin, L.; Kucherlapati, R.; Kolodner, R. D.; et al. Mutation in Rpa1 results in defective DNA double-strand break repair, chromosomal instability and cancer in mice. Nat. Genet. 2005, 37, 750-755.
107. Toledo, L. I.; Altmeyer, M.; Rask, M. B.; Lukas, C.; Larsen, D. H.; Povlsen, L. K.; Bekker-Jensen, S.; Mailand, N.; Bartek, J.; Lukas, J. ATR prohibits replication catastrophe by preventing global exhaustion of RPA. Cell 2013, 155, 1088-1103.
108. Cimprich, K. A.; Cortez, D. ATR: An essential regulator of genome integrity. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2008, 9, 616-627.
109. Bermudez, V. P.; Lindsey-Boltz, L. A.; Cesare, A. J.; Maniwa, Y.; Griffith, J. D.; Hurwitz, J.; Sancar, A. Loading of the human 9-1-1 checkpoint complex onto DNA by the checkpoint clamp loader hRad17-replication factor C complex in vitro. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 1633-1638.
110. Ellison, V.; Stillman, B. Biochemical characterization of DNA damage checkpoint complexes: Clamp loader and clamp complexes with specificity for 5' recessed DNA. PLoS Biol. 2003, 1, E33.
111. Zou, L.; Cortez, D.; Elledge, S. J. Regulation of ATR substrate selection by Rad17-dependent loading of Rad9 complexes onto chromatin. Genes Dev. 2002, 16, 198-208.
112. MacDougall, C. A.; Byun, T. S.; Van, C.; Yee, M. C.; Cimprich, K. A. The structural determinants of checkpoint activation. Genes Dev. 2007, 21, 898-903.
113. Majka, J.; Binz, S. K.; Wold, M. S.; Burgers, P. M. Replication protein A directs loading of the DNA damage checkpoint clamp to 5'-DNA junctions. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 27855-27861.
114. Hashimoto, Y.; Takisawa, H. Xenopus Cut5 is essential for a CDK-dependent process in the initiation of DNA replication. EMBO J. 2003, 22, 2526-2535.
115. Parrilla-Castellar, E. R.; Karnitz, L. M. Cut5 is required for the binding of Atr and DNA polymerase alpha to genotoxin-damaged chromatin. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 45507-45511.
116. Hashimoto, Y.; Tsujimura, T.; Sugino, A.; Takisawa, H. The phosphorylated C-terminal domain of Xenopus Cut5 directly mediates ATR-dependent activation of Chk1. Genes Cells 2006, 11, 993-1007.
117. Yan, S.; Lindsay, H. D.; Michael, W. M. Direct requirement for Xmus101 in ATR-mediated phosphorylation of Claspin bound Chk1 during checkpoint signaling. J. Cell Biol. 2006, 173, 181-186.
118. Handa, T.; Kanke, M.; Takahashi, T. S.; Nakagawa, T.; Masukata, H. DNA polymerization-independent functions of DNA polymerase epsilon in assembly and progression of the replisome in fission yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell 2012, 23, 3240-3253.
119. Delacroix, S.; Wagner, J. M.; Kobayashi, M.; Yamamoto, K.; Karnitz, L. M. The Rad9-Hus1-Rad1 (9-1-1) clamp activates checkpoint signaling via TopBP1. Genes Dev. 2007, 21, 1472-1477.
120. Lee, J.; Kumagai, A.; Dunphy, W. G. The Rad9-Hus1-Rad1 checkpoint clamp regulates interaction of TopBP1 with ATR. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 28036-28044.
121. Furuya, K.; Poitelea, M.; Guo, L.; Caspari, T.; Carr, A. M. Chk1 activation requires Rad9 S/TQ-site phosphorylation to promote association with C-terminal BRCT domains of Rad4TOPBP1. Genes Dev. 2004, 18, 1154-1164.
122. Mordes, D. A.; Glick, G. G.; Zhao, R.; Cortez, D. TopBP1 activates ATR through ATRIP and a PIKK regulatory domain. Genes Dev. 2008, 22, 1478-1489.
123. Kumagai, A.; Lee, J.; Yoo, H. Y.; Dunphy, W. G. TopBP1 activates the ATR-ATRIP complex. Cell 2006, 124, 943-955.
124. Yan, S.; Michael, W. M. TopBP1 and DNA polymerase alpha-mediated recruitment of the 9-1-1 complex to stalled replication forks: Implications for a replication restart-based mechanism for ATR checkpoint activation. Cell Cycle 2009, 8, 2877-2884.
125. Gong, Z.; Kim, J. E.; Leung, C. C.; Glover, J. N.; Chen, J. BACH1/FANCJ acts with TopBP1 and participates early in DNA replication checkpoint control. Mol. Cell 2010, 37, 438-446.
126. Wang, J.; Gong, Z.; Chen, J. MDC1 collaborates with TopBP1 in DNA replication checkpoint control. J. Cell Biol. 2011, 193, 267-273.
127. Duursma, A. M.; Driscoll, R.; Elias, J. E.; Cimprich, K. A. A role for the MRN complex in ATR activation via TOPBP1 recruitment. Mol. Cell 2013, 50, 116-122.
128. Lee, J.; Dunphy, W. G. The Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 (MRN) complex has a specific role in the activation of Chk1 in response to stalled replication forks. Mol. Biol. Cell 2013, 24, 1343-1353.
129. Michael, W. M.; Ott, R.; Fanning, E.; Newport, J. Activation of the DNA replication checkpoint through RNA synthesis by primase. Science 2000, 289, 2133-2137.
130. Lupardus, P. J.; Byun, T.; Yee, M. C.; Hekmat-Nejad, M.; Cimprich, K. A. A requirement for replication in activation of the ATR-dependent DNA damage checkpoint. Genes Dev. 2002, 16, 2327-2332.
131. Van, C.; Yan, S.; Michael, W. M.; Waga, S.; Cimprich, K. A. Continued primer synthesis at stalled replication forks contributes to checkpoint activation. J. Cell Biol. 2010, 189, 233-246.
132. Liu, S.; Shiotani, B.; Lahiri, M.; Marechal, A.; Tse, A.; Leung, C. C.; Glover, J. N.; Yang, X. H.; Zou, L. ATR autophosphorylation as a molecular switch for checkpoint activation. Mol. Cell 2011, 43, 192-202.
133. Bakkenist, C. J.; Kastan, M. B. DNA damage activates ATM through intermolecular autophosphorylation and dimer dissociation. Nature 2003, 421, 499-506.
134. Jazayeri, A.; Balestrini, A.; Garner, E.; Haber, J. E.; Costanzo, V. Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1-dependent processing of DNA breaks generates oligonucleotides that stimulate ATM activity. EMBO J. 2008, 27, 1953-1962.
135. Helleday, T. PrimPol breaks replication barriers. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2013, 20, 1348-1350.
136. Bianchi, J.; Rudd, S. G.; Jozwiakowski, S. K.; Bailey, L. J.; Soura, V.; Taylor, E.; Stevanovic, I.; Green, A. J.; Stracker, T. H.; Lindsay, H. D.; et al. PrimPol bypasses UV photoproducts during eukaryotic chromosomal DNA replication. Mol. Cell 2013, 52, 566-573.
137. Mouron, S.; Rodriguez-Acebes, S.; Martinez-Jimenez, M. I.; Garcia-Gomez, S.; Chocron, S.; Blanco, L.; Mendez, J. Repriming of DNA synthesis at stalled replication forks by human PrimPol. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2013, 20, 1383-1389.
138. Wan, L.; Lou, J.; Xia, Y.; Su, B.; Liu, T.; Cui, J.; Sun, Y.; Lou, H.; Huang, J. hPrimpol1/CCDC111 is a human DNA primase-polymerase required for the maintenance of genome integrity. EMBO Rep. 2013, 14, 1104-1112.
139. Garcia-Gomez, S.; Reyes, A.; Martinez-Jimenez, M. I.; Chocron, E. S.; Mouron, S.; Terrados, G.; Powell, C.; Salido, E.; Mendez, J.; Holt, I. J.; et al. PrimPol, an archaic primase/polymerase operating in human cells. Mol. Cell 2013, 52, 541-553.
140. Gambus, A.; van Deursen, F.; Polychronopoulos, D.; Foltman, M.; Jones, R. C.; Edmondson, R. D.; Calzada, A.; Labib, K. A key role for Ctf4 in coupling the MCM2-7 helicase to DNA polymerase alpha within the eukaryotic replisome. EMBO J. 2009, 28, 2992-3004.
141. Katou, Y.; Kanoh, Y.; Bando, M.; Noguchi, H.; Tanaka, H.; Ashikari, T.; Sugimoto, K.; Shirahige, K. S-phase checkpoint proteins Tof1 and Mrc1 form a stable replication-pausing complex. Nature 2003, 424, 1078-1083.
142. Hekmat-Nejad, M.; You, Z.; Yee, M. C.; Newport, J. W.; Cimprich, K. A. Xenopus ATR is a replication-dependent chromatin-binding protein required for the DNA replication checkpoint. Curr. Biol. 2000, 10, 1565-1573.
143. Bonilla, C. Y.; Melo, J. A.; Toczyski, D. P. Colocalization of sensors is sufficient to activate the DNA damage checkpoint in the absence of damage. Mol. Cell 2008, 30, 267-276.
144. Melo, J. A.; Cohen, J.; Toczyski, D. P. Two checkpoint complexes are independently recruited to sites of DNA damage in vivo. Genes Dev. 2001, 15, 2809-2821.
145. Soutoglou, E.; Misteli, T. Activation of the cellular DNA damage response in the absence of DNA lesions. Science 2008, 320, 1507-1510.
146. Berens, T. J.; Toczyski, D. P. Colocalization of Mec1 and Mrc1 is sufficient for Rad53 phosphorylation in vivo. Mol. Biol. Cell 2012, 23, 1058-1067.
147. Betous, R.; Pillaire, M. J.; Pierini, L.; van der Laan, S.; Recolin, B.; Ohl-Seguy, E.; Guo, C.; Niimi, N.; Gruz, P.; Nohmi, T.; et al. DNA polymerase kappa-dependent DNA synthesis at stalled replication forks is important for CHK1 activation. EMBO J. 2013, 32, 2172-2185.
148. Ward, I. M.; Chen, J. Histone H2AX is phosphorylated in an ATR-dependent manner in response to replicational stress. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 47759-47762.
149. Ishimi, Y.; Komamura-Kohno, Y.; Kwon, H. J.; Yamada, K.; Nakanishi, M. Identification of MCM4 as a target of the DNA replication block checkpoint system. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 24644-24650.
150. Shechter, D.; Gautier, J. MCM proteins and checkpoint kinases get together at the fork. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 10845-10846.
151. Robison, J. G.; Elliott, J.; Dixon, K.; Oakley, G. G. Replication protein A and the Mre11. Rad50. Nbs1 complex co-localize and interact at sites of stalled replication forks. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 34802-34810.
152. Carty, M. P.; Zernik-Kobak, M.; McGrath, S.; Dixon, K. UV light-induced DNA synthesis arrest in HeLa cells is associated with changes in phosphorylation of human single-stranded DNA-binding protein. EMBO J. 1994, 13, 2114-2123.
153. Shao, R. G.; Cao, C. X.; Zhang, H.; Kohn, K. W.; Wold, M. S.; Pommier, Y. Replication-mediated DNA damage by camptothecin induces phosphorylation of RPA by DNA-dependent protein kinase and dissociates RPA: DNA-PK complexes. EMBO J. 1999, 18, 1397-1406.
154. Recolin, B.; Maiorano, D. Implication of RPA32 phosphorylation in S-phase checkpoint signalling at replication forks stalled with aphidicolin in Xenopus egg extracts. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2012, 427, 785-789.
155. Lindsey-Boltz, L. A.; Reardon, J. T.; Wold, M. S.; Sancar, A. In vitro analysis of the role of RPA and RPA phosphorylation in ATR-mediated checkpoint signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 36123-36131.
156. Liu, S.; Opiyo, S. O.; Manthey, K.; Glanzer, J. G.; Ashley, A. K.; Amerin, C.; Troksa, K.; Shrivastav, M.; Nickoloff, J. A.; Oakley, G. G. Distinct roles for DNA-PK, ATM and ATR in RPA phosphorylation and checkpoint activation in response to replication stress. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, 10780-10794.
157. Kumagai, A.; Guo, Z.; Emami, K. H.; Wang, S. X.; Dunphy, W. G. The Xenopus Chk1 protein kinase mediates a caffeine-sensitive pathway of checkpoint control in cell-free extracts. J. Cell Biol. 1998, 142, 1559-1569.
158. Lee, J.; Kumagai, A.; Dunphy, W. G. Claspin, a Chk1-regulatory protein, monitors DNA replication on chromatin independently of RPA, ATR, and Rad17. Mol. Cell 2003, 11, 329-340.
159. Naylor, M. L.; Li, J. M.; Osborn, A. J.; Elledge, S. J. Mrc1 phosphorylation in response to DNA replication stress is required for Mec1 accumulation at the stalled fork. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 12765-12770.
160. Lin, S. Y.; Li, K.; Stewart, G. S.; Elledge, S. J. Human Claspin works with BRCA1 to both positively and negatively regulate cell proliferation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 6484-6489.
161. Unsal-Kacmaz, K.; Chastain, P. D.; Qu, P. P.; Minoo, P.; Cordeiro-Stone, M.; Sancar, A.; Kaufmann, W. K. The human Tim/Tipin complex coordinates an Intra-S checkpoint response to UV that slows replication fork displacement. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2007, 27, 3131-3142.
162. Numata, Y.; Ishihara, S.; Hasegawa, N.; Nozaki, N.; Ishimi, Y. Interaction of human MCM2-7 proteins with TIM, TIPIN and Rb. J. Biochem. 2010, 147, 917-927.
163. Kemp, M. G.; Akan, Z.; Yilmaz, S.; Grillo, M.; Smith-Roe, S. L.; Kang, T. H.; Cordeiro-Stone, M.; Kaufmann, W. K.; Abraham, R. T.; Sancar, A.; et al. Tipin-replication protein A interaction mediates Chk1 phosphorylation by ATR in response to genotoxic stress. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 16562-16571.
164. Lee, J.; Gold, D. A.; Shevchenko, A.; Dunphy, W. G. Roles of replication fork-interacting and Chk1-activating domains from claspin in a DNA replication checkpoint response. Mol. Biol. Cell 2005, 16, 5269-5282.
165. Liu, Q.; Guntuku, S.; Cui, X. S.; Matsuoka, S.; Cortez, D.; Tamai, K.; Luo, G.; Carattini-Rivera, S.; DeMayo, F.; Bradley, A.; et al. Chk1 is an essential kinase that is regulated by Atr and required for the G(2)/M DNA damage checkpoint. Genes Dev. 2000, 14, 1448-1459.
166. Lopez-Girona, A.; Tanaka, K.; Chen, X. B.; Baber, B. A.; McGowan, C. H.; Russell, P. Serine-345 is required for Rad3-dependent phosphorylation and function of checkpoint kinase Chk1 in fission yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 11289-11294.
167. Santocanale, C.; Diffley, J. F. A Mec1-and Rad53-dependent checkpoint controls late-firing origins of DNA replication. Nature 1998, 395, 615-618.
168. Shechter, D.; Costanzo, V.; Gautier, J. ATR and ATM regulate the timing of DNA replication origin firing. Nat. Cell Biol. 2004, 6, 648-655.
169. Woodward, A. M.; Gohler, T.; Luciani, M. G.; Oehlmann, M.; Ge, X.; Gartner, A.; Jackson, D. A.; Blow, J. J. Excess Mcm2-7 license dormant origins of replication that can be used under conditions of replicative stress. J. Cell Biol. 2006, 173, 673-683.
170. Ge, X. Q.; Jackson, D. A.; Blow, J. J. Dormant origins licensed by excess Mcm2-7 are required for human cells to survive replicative stress. Genes Dev. 2007, 21, 3331-3341.
171. De Piccoli, G.; Katou, Y.; Itoh, T.; Nakato, R.; Shirahige, K.; Labib, K. Replisome stability at defective DNA replication forks is independent of S phase checkpoint kinases. Mol. Cell 2012, 45, 696-704.
172. Blasius, M.; Forment, J. V.; Thakkar, N.; Wagner, S. A.; Choudhary, C.; Jackson, S. P. A phospho-proteomic screen identifies substrates of the checkpoint kinase Chk1. Genome Biol. 2011, 12, R78.
173. Jinno, S.; Suto, K.; Nagata, A.; Igarashi, M.; Kanaoka, Y.; Nojima, H.; Okayama, H. Cdc25A is a novel phosphatase functioning early in the cell cycle. EMBO J. 1994, 13, 1549-1556.
174. Molinari, M.; Mercurio, C.; Dominguez, J.; Goubin, F.; Draetta, G. F. Human Cdc25 A inactivation in response to S phase inhibition and its role in preventing premature mitosis. EMBO Rep. 2000, 1, 71-79.
175. Donzelli, M.; Squatrito, M.; Ganoth, D.; Hershko, A.; Pagano, M.; Draetta, G. F. Dual mode of degradation of Cdc25 A phosphatase. EMBO J. 2002, 21, 4875-4884.
176. Boutros, R.; Lobjois, V.; Ducommun, B. CDC25 phosphatases in cancer cells: Key players? Good targets? Nat. Rev. Cancer 2007, 7, 495-507.
177. Van der Laan, S.; Tsanov, N.; Crozet, C.; Maiorano, D. High Dub3 expression in mouse ESCs couples the G1/S checkpoint to pluripotency. Mol. Cell 2013, 52, 366-379.
178. Bartkova, J.; Horejsi, Z.; Koed, K.; Kramer, A.; Tort, F.; Zieger, K.; Guldberg, P.; Sehested, M.; Nesland, J. M.; Lukas, C.; et al. DNA damage response as a candidate anti-cancer barrier in early human tumorigenesis. Nature 2005, 434, 864-870.
179. Bartkova, J.; Hamerlik, P.; Stockhausen, M. T.; Ehrmann, J.; Hlobilkova, A.; Laursen, H.; Kalita, O.; Kolar, Z.; Poulsen, H. S.; Broholm, H.; et al. Replication stress and oxidative damage contribute to aberrant constitutive activation of DNA damage signalling in human gliomas. Oncogene 2011, 29, 5095-5102.
180. Neelsen, K. J.; Zanini, I. M.; Herrador, R.; Lopes, M. Oncogenes induce genotoxic stress by mitotic processing of unusual replication intermediates. J. Cell Biol. 2013, 200, 699-708.