Replisome Stability at Defective DNA Replication Forks Is Independent of S Phase Checkpoint Kinases

Molecular Cell

Volumn 45, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 696-704

  De Piccoli, Giacomo ^a   Katou, Yuki ^b   Itoh, Takehiko ^b   Nakato, Ryuichiro ^c   Shirahige, Katsuhiko ^c   Labib, Karim ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b TOKYO INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHECKPOINT KINASE 2; DNA POLYMERASE; HELICASE; S PHASE KINASE ASSOCIATED PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE G1 PHASE; CELL CYCLE PROGRESSION; CELL FUNCTION; CHROMOSOME REPLICATION; DNA REPLICATION; FUNGAL STRAIN; FUNGUS GROWTH; G1 PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENOME ANALYSIS; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN MODIFICATION; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN STABILITY; REPLISOME; S PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT; YEAST CELL;

CELL CYCLE; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; DNA REPLICATION; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; INTRACELLULAR SIGNALING PEPTIDES AND PROTEINS; PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN-SERINE-THREONINE KINASES; S PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINTS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL;

SACCHAROMYCETALES;

EID: 84858053395     PISSN: 10972765     EISSN: 10974164     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.01.007     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Aparicio T., Guillou E., Coloma J., Montoya G., Mendez J. The human GINS complex associates with Cdc45 and MCM and is essential for DNA replication. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37:2087-2095.
2. Bartek J., Lukas C., Lukas J. Checking on DNA damage in S phase. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2004, 5:792-804.
3. Bartkova J., Horejsi Z., Koed K., Kramer A., Tort F., Zieger K., Guldberg P., Sehested M., Nesland J.M., Lukas C., et al. DNA damage response as a candidate anti-cancer barrier in early human tumorigenesis. Nature 2005, 434:864-870.
4. Bermejo R., Capra T., Jossen R., Colosio A., Frattini C., Carotenuto W., Cocito A., Doksani Y., Klein H., Gomez-Gonzalez B., et al. The replication checkpoint protects fork stability by releasing transcribed genes from nuclear pores. Cell 2011, 146:233-246.
5. Branzei D., Foiani M. Maintaining genome stability at the replication fork. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010, 11:208-219.
6. Chen S.H., Albuquerque C.P., Liang J., Suhandynata R.T., Zhou H. A proteome-wide analysis of kinase-substrate network in the DNA damage response. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285:12803-12812.
7. Cobb J.A., Bjergbaek L., Shimada K., Frei C., Gasser S.M. DNA polymerase stabilization at stalled replication forks requires Mec1 and the RecQ helicase Sgs1. EMBO J. 2003, 22:4325-4336.
8. Cobb J.A., Schleker T., Rojas V., Bjergbaek L., Tercero J.A., Gasser S.M. Replisome instability, fork collapse, and gross chromosomal rearrangements arise synergistically from Mec1 kinase and RecQ helicase mutations. Genes Dev. 2005, 19:3055-3069.
9. Cotta-Ramusino C., Fachinetti D., Lucca C., Doksani Y., Lopes M., Sogo J., Foiani M. Exo1 processes stalled replication forks and counteracts fork reversal in checkpoint-defective cells. Mol. Cell 2005, 17:153-159.
10. Feng W., Collingwood D., Boeck M.E., Fox L.A., Alvino G.M., Fangman W.L., Raghuraman M.K., Brewer B.J. Genomic mapping of single-stranded DNA in hydroxyurea-challenged yeasts identifies origins of replication. Nat. Cell Biol. 2006, 8:148-155.
11. Friedel A.M., Pike B.L., Gasser S.M. ATR/Mec1: coordinating fork stability and repair. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2009, 21:237-244.
12. Gambus A., Jones R.C., Sanchez-Diaz A., Kanemaki M., van Deursen F., Edmondson R.D., Labib K. GINS maintains association of Cdc45 with MCM in replisome progression complexes at eukaryotic DNA replication forks. Nat. Cell Biol. 2006, 8:358-366.
13. Gambus A., van Deursen F., Polychronopoulos D., Foltman M., Jones R.C., Edmondson R.D., Calzada A., Labib K. A key role for Ctf4 in coupling the MCM2-7 helicase to DNA polymerase alpha within the eukaryotic replisome. EMBO J. 2009, 28:2992-3004.
14. Gorgoulis V.G., Vassiliou L.V., Karakaidos P., Zacharatos P., Kotsinas A., Liloglou T., Venere M., Ditullio R.A., Kastrinakis N.G., Levy B., et al. Activation of the DNA damage checkpoint and genomic instability in human precancerous lesions. Nature 2005, 434:907-913.
15. Gruber S., Arumugam P., Katou Y., Kuglitsch D., Helmhart W., Shirahige K., Nasmyth K. Evidence that loading of cohesin onto chromosomes involves opening of its SMC hinge. Cell 2006, 127:523-537.
16. Im J.S., Ki S.H., Farina A., Jung D.S., Hurwitz J., Lee J.K. Assembly of the Cdc45-Mcm2-7-GINS complex in human cells requires the Ctf4/And-1, RecQL4, and Mcm10 proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106:15628-15632.
17. Kanemaki M., Labib K. Distinct roles for Sld3 and GINS during establishment and progression of eukaryotic DNA replication forks. EMBO J. 2006, 25:1753-1763.
18. Kanemaki M., Sanchez-Diaz A., Gambus A., Labib K. Functional proteomic identification of DNA replication proteins by induced proteolysis in vivo. Nature 2003, 423:720-725.
19. Katou Y., Kanoh Y., Bando M., Noguchi H., Tanaka H., Ashikari T., Sugimoto K., Shirahige K. S-phase checkpoint proteins Tof1 and Mrc1 form a stable replication-pausing complex. Nature 2003, 424:1078-1083.
20. Kim S., Dallmann H.G., McHenry C.S., Marians K.J. Coupling of a replicative polymerase and helicase: a tau-DnaB interaction mediates rapid replication fork movement. Cell 1996, 84:643-650.
21. Labib K., De Piccoli G. Surviving chromosome replication: the many roles of the S-phase checkpoint pathway. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2011, 366:3554-3561.
22. Lambert S., Froget B., Carr A.M. Arrested replication fork processing: interplay between checkpoints and recombination. DNA Repair (Amst.) 2007, 6:1042-1061.
23. Lopez-Contreras A.J., Fernandez-Capetillo O. The ATR barrier to replication-born DNA damage. DNA Repair (Amst.) 2010, 9:1249-1255.
24. Lucca C., Vanoli F., Cotta-Ramusino C., Pellicioli A., Liberi G., Haber J., Foiani M. Checkpoint-mediated control of replisome-fork association and signalling in response to replication pausing. Oncogene 2004, 23:1206-1213.
25. Luciani M.G., Oehlmann M., Blow J.J. Characterization of a novel ATR-dependent, Chk1-independent, intra-S-phase checkpoint that suppresses initiation of replication in Xenopus. J. Cell Sci. 2004, 117:6019-6030.
26. Matsuoka S., Ballif B.A., Smogorzewska A., McDonald E.R., Hurov K.E., Luo J., Bakalarski C.E., Zhao Z., Solimini N., Lerenthal Y., et al. ATM and ATR substrate analysis reveals extensive protein networks responsive to DNA damage. Science 2007, 316:1160-1166.
27. Morohashi H., Maculins T., Labib K. The amino-terminal TPR domain of Dia2 tethers SCF(Dia2) to the replisome progression complex. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19:1943-1949.
28. Moyer S.E., Lewis P.W., Botchan M.R. Isolation of the Cdc45/Mcm2-7/GINS (CMG) complex, a candidate for the eukaryotic DNA replication fork helicase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103:10236-10241.
29. Naylor M.L., Li J.M., Osborn A.J., Elledge S.J. Mrc1 phosphorylation in response to DNA replication stress is required for Mec1 accumulation at the stalled fork. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106:12765-12770.
30. Ohuchi T., Seki M., Kugou K., Tada S., Ohta K., Enomoto T. Accumulation of sumoylated Rad52 in checkpoint mutants perturbed in DNA replication. DNA Repair (Amst.) 2009, 8:690-696.
31. Petermann E., Woodcock M., Helleday T. Chk1 promotes replication fork progression by controlling replication initiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107:16090-16095.
32. Raghuraman M.K., Winzeler E.A., Collingwood D., Hunt S., Wodicka L., Conway A., Lockhart D.J., Davis R.W., Brewer B.J., Fangman W.L. Replication dynamics of the yeast genome. Science 2001, 294:115-121.
33. Raveendranathan M., Chattopadhyay S., Bolon Y.T., Haworth J., Clarke D.J., Bielinsky A.K. Genome-wide replication profiles of S-phase checkpoint mutants reveal fragile sites in yeast. EMBO J. 2006, 25:3627-3639.
34. Rosenfeld J.A., Wang Z., Schones D.E., Zhao K., DeSalle R., Zhang M.Q. Determination of enriched histone modifications in non-genic portions of the human genome. BMC Genomics 2009, 10:143.
35. Smolka M.B., Albuquerque C.P., Chen S.H., Zhou H. Proteome-wide identification of in vivo targets of DNA damage checkpoint kinases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104:10364-10369.
36. Sogo J.M., Lopes M., Foiani M. Fork reversal and ssDNA accumulation at stalled replication forks owing to checkpoint defects. Science 2002, 297:599-602.
37. Tercero J.A., Longhese M.P., Diffley J.F. A central role for DNA replication forks in checkpoint activation and response. Mol. Cell 2003, 11:1323-1336.
38. Trenz K., Smith E., Smith S., Costanzo V. ATM and ATR promote Mre11 dependent restart of collapsed replication forks and prevent accumulation of DNA breaks. EMBO J. 2006, 25:1764-1774.
39. Xu W., Aparicio J.G., Aparicio O.M., Tavare S. Genome-wide mapping of ORC and Mcm2p binding sites on tiling arrays and identification of essential ARS consensus sequences in S. cerevisiae. BMC Genomics 2006, 7:276.
40. Zegerman P., Diffley J.F. Checkpoint-dependent inhibition of DNA replication initiation by Sld3 and Dbf4 phosphorylation. Nature 2010, 467:474-478.
41. Zhao X., Chabes A., Domkin V., Thelander L., Rothstein R. The ribonucleotide reductase inhibitor Sml1 is a new target of the Mec1/Rad53 kinase cascade during growth and in response to DNA damage. EMBO J. 2001, 20:3544-3553.