Interplays between ATM/Tel1 and ATR/Mec1 in sensing and signaling DNA double-strand breaks

DNA Repair

Volumn 12, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 791-799

  Gobbini, Elisa ^a   Cesena, Daniele ^a   Galbiati, Alessandro ^a   Lockhart, Arianna ^a   Longhese, Maria Pia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MILANO BICOCCA   (Italy)

Author keywords

ATM Tel1; ATR Mec1; Checkpoint; DNA double strand breaks; MRN MRX; Resection

Indexed keywords

ATM PROTEIN; ATR PROTEIN; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA;

ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT; DNA DAMAGE; DNA DAMAGE CHECKPOINT; DNA REPAIR; DNA STRAND BREAKAGE; DNA STRUCTURE; ENZYME ACTIVATION; HUMAN; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

EID: 84885369839     PISSN: 15687864     EISSN: 15687856     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2013.07.009     Document Type: Review

References (131)

1. Lieber M.R. The mechanism of double-strand DNA break repair by the nonhomologous DNA end-joining pathway. Annual Review of Biochemistry 2010, 79:181-211.
2. San Filippo J., Sung P., Klein H. Mechanism of eukaryotic homologous recombination. Annual Review of Biochemistry 2008, 77:229-257.
3. Ciccia A., Elledge S.J. The DNA damage response: making it safe to play with knives. Molecular Cell 2010, 40:179-204.
4. Savitsk K., Sfez S., Tagle D.A., Ziv Y., Sartiel A., Collins F.S., Shiloh Y., Rotman G. The complete sequence of the coding region of the ATM gene reveals similarity to cell cycle regulators in different species. Human Molecular Genetics 1995, 4:2025-2032.
5. O'Driscoll M., Ruiz-Perez V.L., Woods C.G., Jeggo P.A., Goodship J.A. A splicing mutation affecting expression of ataxia-telangiectasia and Rad3-related protein (ATR) results in Seckel syndrome. Nature Genetics 2003, 33:497-501.
6. Lisby M., Barlow J.H., Burgess R.C., Rothstein R. Choreography of the DNA damage response: spatiotemporal relationships among checkpoint and repair proteins. Cell 2004, 118:699-713.
7. Chen L., Trujillo K., Ramos W., Sung P., Tomkinson A.E. Promotion of Dnl4-catalyzed DNA end-joining by the Rad50/Mre11/Xrs2 and Hdf1/Hdf2 complexes. Molecular Cell 2001, 8:1105-1115.
8. Zhang Y., Hefferin M.L., Chen L., Shim E.Y., Tseng H.M., Kwon Y., Sung P., Lee S.E., Tomkinson A.E. Role of Dnl4-Lif1 in nonhomologous end-joining repair complex assembly and suppression of homologous recombination. Nature Structural and Molecular Biology 2007, 14:639-646.
9. Palmbos P.L., Wu D., Daley J.M., Wilson T.E. Recruitment of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Dnl4-Lif1 complex to a double-strand break requires interactions with Yku80 and the Xrs2 FHA domain. Genetics 2008, 180:1809-1819.
10. Longhese M.P., Bonetti D., Manfrini N., Clerici M. Mechanisms and regulation of DNA end resection. EMBO Journal 2010, 29:2864-2874.
11. Ivanov E.L., Sugawara N., White C.I., Fabre F., Haber J.E. Mutations in XRS2 and RAD50 delay but do not prevent mating-type switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Molecular and Cellular Biology 1994, 14:3414-3425.
12. Clerici M., Mantiero D., Lucchini G., Longhese M.P. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sae2 protein promotes resection and bridging of double strand break ends. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2005, 280:38631-38638.
13. Connelly J.C., Kirkham L.A., Leach D.R.F. The SbcCD nuclease of Escherichia coli is a structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) family protein that cleaves hairpin DNA. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1998, 95:7969-7974.
14. Paull T.T., Gellert M. The 3' to 5' exonuclease activity of Mre11 facilitates repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Molecular Cell 1998, 1:969-979.
15. Trujillo K.M., Yuan S.S., Lee E.Y., Sung P. Nuclease activities in a complex of human recombination and DNA repair factors Rad50, Mre11, and p95. Journal of Biological Chemistry 1998, 273:21447-21450.
16. Mimitou E.P., Symington L.S. Sae2, Exo1, Sgs1 collaborate in DNA double-strand break processing. Nature 2008, 455:770-774.
17. Zhu Z., Chung W.H., Shim E.Y., Lee S.E., Ira G. Sgs1 helicase and two nucleases Dna2 and Exo1 resect DNA double-strand break ends. Cell 2008, 134:981-994.
18. Lengsfeld B.M., Rattray A.J., Bhaskara V., Ghirlando R., Paull T.T. Sae2 is an endonuclease that processes hairpin DNA cooperatively with the Mre11/Rad50/Xrs2 complex. Molecular Cell 2007, 28:638-651.
19. Limbo O., Chahwan C., Yamada Y., de Bruin R.A., Wittenberg C., Russell P. Ctp1 is a cell-cycle-regulated protein that functions with Mre11 complex to control double-strand break repair by homologous recombination. Molecular Cell 2007, 28:134-146.
20. Sartori A.A., Lukas C., Coates J., Mistrik M., Fu S., Bartek J., Baer R., Lukas J., Jackson S.P. Human CtIP promotes DNA end resection. Nature 2007, 450:509-514.
21. Huertas P., Cortes-Ledesma F., Sartori A.A., Aguilera A., Jackson S.P. CDK targets Sae2 to control DNA-end resection and homologous recombination. Nature 2008, 455:689-692.
22. Chen L., Nievera C.J., Lee A.Y., Wu X. Cell cycle-dependent complex formation of BRCA1.CtIP.MRN is important for DNA double-strand break repair. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2008, 283:7713-7720.
23. Huertas P., Jackson S.P. Human CtIP mediates cell cycle control of DNA end resection and double strand break repair. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2009, 284:9558-9565.
24. Yun M.H., Hiom K. CtIP-BRCA1 modulates the choice of DNA double-strand-break repair pathway throughout the cell cycle. Nature 2009, 459:460-463.
25. Aylon Y., Liefshitz B., Kupiec M. The CDK regulates repair of double-strand breaks by homologous recombination during the cell cycle. EMBO Journal 2004, 23:4868-4875.
26. Ira G., Pellicioli A., Balijja A., Wang X., Fiorani S., Carotenuto W., Liberi G., Bressan D., Wan L., Hollingsworth N.M., Haber J.E., Foiani M. DNA end resection, homologous recombination and DNA damage checkpoint activation require CDK1. Nature 2004, 431:1011-1017.
27. Keeney S., Kleckner N. Covalent protein-DNA complexes at the 5' strand termini of meiosis-specific double-strand breaks in yeast. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1995, 92:11274-11278.
28. Furuse M., Nagase Y., Tsubouchi H., Murakami-Murofushi K., Shibata T., Ohta K. Distinct roles of two separable in vitro activities of yeast Mre11 in mitotic and meiotic recombination. EMBO Journal 1998, 17:6412-6425.
29. Tsubouchi H., Ogawa H. A novel mre11 mutation impairs processing of double-strand breaks of DNA during both mitosis and meiosis. Molecular and Cellular Biology 1998, 18:260-268.
30. Usui T., Ohta T., Oshiumi H., Tomizawa J., Ogawa H., Ogawa T. Complex formation and functional versatility of Mre11 of budding yeast in recombination. Cell 1998, 95:705-716.
31. Moreau S., Ferguson J.R., Symington L.S. The nuclease activity of Mre11 is required for meiosis but not for mating type switching, end joining, or telomere maintenance. Molecular and Cellular Biology 1999, 19:556-566.
32. Lobachev K.S., Gordenin D.A., Resnick M.A. The Mre11 complex is required for repair of hairpin-capped double-strand breaks and prevention of chromosome rearrangements. Cell 2002, 108:183-193.
33. Chen X., Niu H., Chung W.H., Zhu Z., Papusha A., Shim E.Y., Lee S.E., Sung P., Ira G. Cell cycle regulation of DNA double-strand break end resection by Cdk1-dependent Dna2 phosphorylation. Nature Structural and Molecular Biology 2011, 18:1015-1019.
34. Cejka P., Cannavo E., Polaczek P., Masuda-Sasa T., Pokharel S., Campbell J.L., Kowalczykowski S.C. DNA end resection by Dna2-Sgs1-RPA and its stimulation by Top3-Rmi1 and Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2. Nature 2010, 467:112-116.
35. Niu H., Chung W.H., Zhu Z., Kwon Y., Zhao W., Chi P., Prakash R., Seong C., Liu D., Lu L., Ira G., Sung P. Mechanism of the ATP-dependent DNA end-resection machinery from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 2010, 467:108-111.
36. Shim E.Y., Chung W.H., Nicolette M.L., Zhang Y., Davis M., Zhu Z., Paull T.T., Ira G., Lee S.E. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mre11/Rad50/Xrs2 and Ku proteins regulate association of Exo1 and Dna2 with DNA breaks. EMBO Journal 2010, 29:3370-3380.
37. Nimonkar A.V., Ozsoy A.Z., Genschel J., Modrich P., Kowalczykowski S.C. Human exonuclease 1 and BLM helicase interact to resect DNA and initiate DNA repair. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2008, 105:16906-16911.
38. Nimonkar A.V., Genschel J., Kinoshita E., Polaczek P., Campbell J.L., Wyman C., Modrich P., Kowalczykowski S.C. BLM-DNA2-RPA-MRN and EXO1-BLM-RPA-MRN constitute two DNA end resection machineries for human DNA break repair. Genes and Development 2011, 25:350-362.
39. Yan H., Toczylowski T., McCane J., Chen C., Liao S. Replication protein A promotes 5'-3' end processing during homology-dependent DNA double-strand break repair. Journal of Cell Biology 2011, 192:251-261.
40. Chen H., Lisby M., Symington L.S. RPA coordinates DNA end resection and prevents formation of DNA hairpins. Molecular Cell 2013, 50:589-600.
41. Seeber A., Hauer M., Gasser S.M. Nucleosome remodelers in double-strand break repair. Current Opinion in Genetics and Development 2013, 23:174-184.
42. Adkins N.L., Niu H., Sung P., Peterson C.L. Nucleosome dynamics regulates DNA processing. Nature Structural and Molecular Biology 2013, 20:836-842.
43. Bonetti D., Anbalagan S., Lucchini G., Clerici M., Longhese M.P. Tbf1, Vid22 promote resection and non-homologous end joining of DNA double-strand break ends. EMBO Journal 2013, 32:275-289.
44. Badis G., Chan E.T., van Bakel H., Pena-Castillo L., Tillo D., Tsui K., Carlson C.D., Gossett A.J., Hasinoff M.J., Warren C.L., Gebbia M., Talukder S., Yang A., Mnaimneh S., Terterov D., Coburn D., Li Yeo A., Yeo Z.X., Clarke N.D., Lieb J.D., Ansari A.Z., Nislow C., Hughes T.R. A library of yeast transcription factor motifs reveals a widespread function for Rsc3 in targeting nucleosome exclusion at promoters. Molecular Cell 2008, 32:878-887.
45. Preti M., Ribeyre C., Pascali C., Bosio M.C., Cortelazzi B., Rougemont J., Guarnera E., Naef F., Shore D., Dieci G. The telomere-binding protein Tbf1 demarcates snoRNA gene promoters in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Molecular Cell 2010, 38:614-620.
46. Fourel G., Boscheron C., Revardel E., Lebrun E., Hu Y.F., Simmen K.C., Müller K., Li R., Mermod N., Gilson E. An activation-independent role of transcription factors in insulator function. EMBO Reports 2001, 2:124-132.
47. Fourel G., Revardel E., Koering C.E., Gilson E. Cohabitation of insulators and silencing elements in yeast subtelomeric regions. EMBO Journal 1999, 18:2522-2537.
48. Clerici M., Mantiero D., Guerini I., Lucchini G., Longhese M.P. The Yku70-Yku80 complex contributes to regulate double-strand break processing and checkpoint activation during the cell cycle. EMBO Reports 2008, 9:810-818.
49. Zierhut C., Diffley J.F. Break dosage, cell cycle stage and DNA replication influence DNA double strand break response. EMBO Journal 2008, 27:1875-1885.
50. Mimitou E.P., Symington L.S. Ku prevents Exo1 and Sgs1-dependent resection of DNA ends in the absence of a functional MRX complex or Sae2. EMBO Journal 2010, 29:3358-3369.
51. Wu D., Topper L.M., Wilson T.E. Recruitment and dissociation of nonhomologous end joining proteins at a DNA double-strand break in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 2008, 178:1237-1249.
52. Lydall D., Weinert T. Yeast checkpoint genes in DNA damage processing: implications for repair and arrest. Science 1995, 270:1488-1491.
53. Lazzaro F., Sapountzi V., Granata M., Pellicioli A., Vaze M., Haber J.E., Plevani P., Lydall D., Muzi-Falconi M. Histone methyltransferase Dot1 and Rad9 inhibit single-stranded DNA accumulation at DSBs and uncapped telomeres. EMBO Journal 2008, 27:1502-1512.
54. Chen X., Cui D., Papusha A., Zhang X., Chu C.D., Tang J., Chen K., Pan X., Ira G. The Fun30 nucleosome remodeller promotes resection of DNA double-strand break ends. Nature 2012, 489:576-580.
55. Costelloe T., Louge R., Tomimatsu N., Mukherjee B., Martini E., Khadaroo B., Dubois K., Wiegant W.W., Thierry A., Burma S., van Attikum H., Llorente B. The yeast Fun30 and human SMARCAD1 chromatin remodellers promote DNA end resection. Nature 2012, 489:581-584.
56. Eapen V.V., Sugawara N., Tsabar M., Wu W.H., Haber J.E. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromatin remodeler Fun30 regulates DNA end resection and checkpoint deactivation. Molecular and Cellular Biology 2012, 32:4727-4740.
57. Bothmer A., Robbiani D.F., Feldhahn N., Gazumyan A., Nussenzweig A., Nussenzweig M.C. 53BP1 regulates DNA resection and the choice between classical and alternative end joining during class switch recombination. Journal of Experimental Medicine 2010, 207:855-865.
58. Bunting S.F., Callén E., Wong N., Chen H.T., Polato F., Gunn A., Bothmer A., Feldhahn N., Fernandez-Capetillo O., Cao L., Xu X., Deng C.X., Finkel T., Nussenzweig M., Stark J.M., Nussenzweig A. 53BP1 inhibits homologous recombination in Brca1-deficient cells by blocking resection of DNA breaks. Cell 2010, 141:243-254.
59. Bouwman P., Aly A., Escandell J.M., Pieterse M., Bartkova J., van der Gulden H., Hiddingh S., Thanasoula M., Kulkarni A., Yang Q., Haffty B.G., Tommiska J., Blomqvist C., Drapkin R., Adams D.J., Nevanlinna H., Bartek J., Tarsounas M., Ganesan S., Jonkers J. 53BP1 loss rescues BRCA1 deficiency and is associated with triple-negative and BRCA-mutated breast cancers. Nature Structural and Molecular Biology 2010, 17:688-695.
60. Cao L., Xu X., Bunting S.F., Liu J., Wang R.H., Cao L.L., Wu J.J., Peng T.N., Chen J., Nussenzweig A., Deng C.X., Finkel T. A selective requirement for 53BP1 in the biological response to genomic instability induced by Brca1 deficiency. Molecular Cell 2009, 35:534-541.
61. Chapman J.R., Barral P., Vannier J.B., Borel V., Steger M., Tomas-Loba A., Sartori A.A., Adams I.R., Batista F.D., Boulton S.J. RIF1 is essential for 53BP1-dependent nonhomologous end joining and suppression of DNA double-strand break resection. Molecular Cell 2013, 49:858-871.
62. Di Virgilio M., Callen E., Yamane A., Zhang W., Jankovic M., Gitlin A.D., Feldhahn N., Resch W., Oliveira T.Y., Chait B.T., Nussenzweig A., Casellas R., Robbiani D.F., Nussenzweig M.C. Rif1 prevents resection of DNA breaks and promotes immunoglobulin class switching. Science 2013, 339:711-715.
63. Zimmermann M., Lottersberger F., Buonomo S.B., Sfeir A., de Lange T. 53BP1 regulates DSB repair using Rif1 to control 5' end resection. Science 2013, 339:700-704.
64. Escribano-Díaz C., Orthwein A., Fradet-Turcotte A., Xing M., Young J.T., Tkáč J., Cook M.A., Rosebrock A.P., Munro M., Canny M.D., Xu D., Durocher D. A cell cycle-dependent regulatory circuit composed of 53BP1-RIF1 and BRCA1-CtIP controls DNA repair pathway choice. Molecular Cell 2013, 49:872-883.
65. Hardy C.F., Sussel L., Shore D. A RAP1-interacting protein involved in transcriptional silencing and telomere length regulation. Genes and Development 1992, 6:801-814.
66. Bonetti D., Clerici M., Anbalagan S., Martina M., Lucchini G., Longhese M.P. Shelterin-like proteins and Yku inhibit nucleolytic processing of Saccharomyces cerevisiae telomeres. PLoS Genetics 2010, 6:e1000966.
67. Anbalagan S., Bonetti D., Lucchini G., Longhese M.P. Rif1 supports the function of the CST complex in yeast telomere capping. PLoS Genetics 2011, 7:e1002024.
68. Xue Y., Rushton M.D., Maringele L. A novel checkpoint and RPA inhibitory pathway regulated by Rif1. PLoS Genetics 2011, 7:e1002417.
69. Ribeyre C., Shore D. Anticheckpoint pathways at telomeres in yeast. Nature Structural and Molecular Biology 2012, 19:307-313.
70. Lempiäinen H., Halazonetis T.D. Emerging common themes in regulation of PIKKs and PI3Ks. EMBO Journal 2009, 28:3067-3073.
71. Bosotti R., Isacchi A., Sonnhammer E.L. FAT: a novel domain in PIK-related kinases. Trends in Biochemical Sciences 2000, 25:225-227.
72. Perry J., Kleckner N. The ATRs, ATMs, and TORs are giant HEAT repeat proteins. Cell 2003, 112:151-155.
73. Andrade M.A., Petosa C., O'Donoghue S.I., Müller C.W., Bork P. Comparison of ARM and HEAT protein repeats. Journal of Molecular Biology 2001, 309:1-18.
74. Sanchez Y., Bachant J., Wang H., Hu F., Liu D., Tetzlaff M., Elledge S.J. Control of the DNA damage checkpoint by Chk1 and Rad53 protein kinases through distinct mechanisms. Science 1999, 286:1166-1171.
75. Sun Z., Hsiao J., Fay D.S., Stern S.F. Rad53 FHA domain associated with phosphorylated Rad9 in the DNA damage checkpoint. Science 1998, 281:272-274.
76. Schwartz M.F., Duong J.K., Sun Z., Morrow J.S., Pradhan D., Stern D.F. Rad9 phosphorylation sites couple Rad53 to the Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA damage checkpoint. Molecular Cell 2002, 9:1055-1065.
77. Sweeney F.D., Yang F., Chi A., Shabanowitz J., Hunt D.F., Durocher D. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad9 acts as a Mec1 adaptor to allow Rad53 activation. Current Biology 2005, 15:1364-1375.
78. Sanchez Y., Desany B.A., Jones W.J., Liu Q., Wang B., Elledge S.J. Regulation of RAD53 by the ATM-like kinases MEC1 and TEL1 in yeast cell cycle checkpoint pathways. Science 1996, 271:357-360.
79. Sun Z., Fay D.S., Marini F., Foiani M., Stern D.F. Spk1/Rad53 is regulated by Mec1-dependent protein phosphorylation in DNA replication and damage checkpoint pathways. Genes and Development 1996, 10:395-406.
80. Usui T., Foster S.S., Petrini J.H. Maintenance of the DNA-damage checkpoint requires DNA-damage-induced mediator protein oligomerization. Molecular Cell 2009, 33:147-159.
81. Gilbert C.S., Green C.M., Lowndes N.F. Budding yeast Rad9 is an ATP-dependent Rad53 activating machine. Molecular Cell 2001, 8:129-136.
82. Javaheri A., Wysocki R., Jobin-Robitaille O., Altaf M., Cote J., Kron S.J. Yeast G1 DNA damage checkpoint regulation by H2A phosphorylation is independent of chromatin remodeling. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2006, 103:13771-13776.
83. Grenon M., Costelloe T., Jimeno S., O'Shaughnessy A., Fitzgerald J., Zgheib O., Degerth L., Lowndes N.F. Docking onto chromatin via the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad9 Tudor domain. Yeast 2007, 24:105-119.
84. Hammet A., Magill C., Heierhorst J., Jackson S.P. Rad9 BRCT domain interaction with phosphorylated H2AX regulates the G1 checkpoint in budding yeast. EMBO Reports 2007, 8:851-857.
85. Granata M., Lazzaro F., Novarina D., Panigada D., Puddu F., Abreu C.M., Kumar R., Grenon M., Lowndes N.F., Plevani P., Muzi-Falconi M. Dynamics of Rad9 chromatin binding and checkpoint function are mediated by its dimerization and are cell cycle-regulated by CDK1 activity. PLoS Genetics 2010, 6:e1001047.
86. Nakamura T.M., Du L.L., Redon C., Russell P. Histone H2A phosphorylation controls Crb2 recruitment at DNA breaks, maintains checkpoint arrest, and influences DNA repair in fission yeast. Molecular and Cellular Biology 2004, 24:6215-6230.
87. Du L.L., Nakamura T.M., Russell P. Histone modification-dependent and -independent pathways for recruitment of checkpoint protein Crb2 to double-strand breaks. Genes and Development 2006, 20:1583-1596.
88. Toh G.W., O'Shaughnessy A.M., Jimeno S., Dobbie I.M., Grenon M., Maffini S., O'Rorke A., Lowndes N.F. Histone H2A phosphorylation and H3 methylation are required for a novel Rad9 DSB repair function following checkpoint activation. DNA Repair 2006, 5:693-703.
89. Iwabuchi K., Basu B.P., Kysela B., Kurihara T., Shibata M., Gua D., Cao Y., Hamada T., Imamura K., Jeggo P.A., Date T., Doherty A.J. Potential role for 53BP1 in DNA end-joining repair through direct interaction with DNA. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2003, 278:36487-36495.
90. Ward I.M., Minn K., Jorda K.G., Chen J. Accumulation of checkpoint protein 53BP1 at DNA breaks involves its binding to phosphorylated histone H2AX. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2003, 278:19579-19582.
91. Bakkenist C.J., Kastan M.B. DNA damage activates ATM through intermolecular autophosphorylation and dimer dissociation. Nature 2003, 421:499-506.
92. Kozlov S.V., Graham M.E., Peng C., Chen P., Robinson P.J., Lavin M.F. Involvement of novel autophosphorylation sites in ATM activation. EMBO Journal 2006, 25:3504-3514.
93. Kozlov S.V., Graham M.E., Jakob B., Tobias F., Kijas A.W., Tanuji M., Chen P., Robinson P.J., Taucher-Scholz G., Suzuki K., So S., Chen D., Lavin M.F. Autophosphorylation and ATM activation: additional sites add to the complexity. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2011, 286:9107-9119.
94. Berkovich E., Monnat R.J., Kastan M.B. Roles of ATM and NBS1 in chromatin structure modulation and DNA double-strand break repair. Nature Cell Biology 2007, 9:683-690.
95. So S., Davis A.J., Chen D.J. Autophosphorylation at serine 1981 stabilizes ATM at DNA damage sites. Journal of Cell Biology 2009, 187:977-990.
96. Williams G.J., Lees-Miller S.P., Tainer J.A. Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 conformations and the control of sensing, signaling, and effector responses at DNA double-strand breaks. DNA Repair 2010, 9:1299-1306.
97. Nakada D., Matsumoto K., Sugimoto K. ATM-related Tel1 associates with double-strand breaks through an Xrs2-dependent mechanism. Genes and Development 2003, 17:1957-1962.
98. Falck J., Coates J., Jackson S.P. Conserved modes of recruitment of ATM, ATR and DNA-PKcs to sites of DNA damage. Nature 2005, 434:605-611.
99. Lee J.H., Paull T.T. ATM activation by DNA double-strand breaks through the Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 complex. Science 2005, 308:551-554.
100. You Z., Chahwan C., Bailis J., Hunter T., Russell P. ATM activation and its recruitment to damaged DNA require binding to the C terminus of Nbs1. Molecular and Cellular Biology 2005, 25:5363-5379.
101. Soutoglou E., Misteli T. Activation of the cellular DNA damage response in the absence of DNA lesions. Science 2008, 320:1507-1510.
102. Jazayeri A., Balestrini A., Garner E., Haber J.E., Costanzo V. Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1-dependent processing of DNA breaks generates oligonucleotides that stimulate ATM activity. EMBO Journal 2008, 27:1953-1962.
103. Fukunaga K., Kwon Y., Sung P., Sugimoto K. Activation of protein kinase Tel1 through recognition of protein-bound DNA ends. Molecular and Cellular Biology 2011, 31:1959-1971.
104. Jazayeri A., Falck J., Lukas C., Bartek J., Smith G.C., Lukas J., Jackson S.P. ATM- and cell cycle-dependent regulation of ATR in response to DNA double-strand breaks. Nature Cell Biology 2006, 8:37-45.
105. Zou L., Elledge S.J. Sensing DNA damage through ATRIP recognition of RPA-ssDNA complexes. Science 2003, 300:1542-1548.
106. Ball H.L., Ehrhardt M.R., Mordes D.A., Glick G.G., Chazin W.J., Cortez D. Function of a conserved checkpoint recruitment domain in ATRIP proteins. Molecular and Cellular Biology 2007, 27:3367-3377.
107. Paciotti V., Clerici M., Lucchini G., Longhese M.P. The checkpoint protein Ddc2, functionally related to S. pombe Rad26, interacts with Mec1 and is regulated by Mec1-dependent phosphorylation in budding yeast. Genes and Development 2000, 14:2046-2059.
108. Cortez D., Guntuku S., Qin J., Elledge S.J. ATR and ATRIP: partners in checkpoint signaling. Science 2001, 294:1713-1716.
109. Majka J., Niedziela-Majka A., Burgers P.M. The checkpoint clamp activates Mec1 kinase during initiation of the DNA damage checkpoint. Molecular Cell 2006, 24:891-901.
110. Navadgi-Patil V.M., Burgers P.M. The unstructured C-terminal tail of the 9-1-1 clamp subunit Ddc1 activates Mec1/ATR via two distinct mechanisms. Molecular Cell 2009, 36:743-753.
111. Furuya K., Poitelea M., Guo L., Caspari T., Carr A.M. Chk1 activation requires Rad9 S/TQ-site phosphorylation to promote association with C-terminal BRCT domains of Rad4TOPBP1. Genes and Development 2004, 18:1154-1164.
112. Kumagai A., Lee J., Yoo H.Y., Dunphy W.G. TopBP1 activates the ATR-ATRIP complex. Cell 2006, 124:943-955.
113. Delacroix S., Wagner J.M., Kobayashi M., Yamamoto K., Karnitz L.M. The Rad9-Hus1-Rad1 (9-1-1) clamp activates checkpoint signaling via TopBP1. Genes and Development 2007, 21:1472-1477.
114. Mordes D.A., Glick G.G., Zhao R., Cortez D. TopBP1 activates ATR through ATRIP and a PIKK regulatory domain. Genes and Development 2008, 22:1478-1489.
115. Mordes D.A., Nam E.A., Cortez D. Dpb11 activates the Mec1-Ddc2 complex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2008, 105:18730-18734.
116. Navadgi-Patil V.M., Burgers P.M. Yeast DNA replication protein Dpb11 activates the Mec1/ATR checkpoint kinase. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2008, 283:35853-35859.
117. Puddu F., Granata M., Di Nola L., Balestrini A., Piergiovanni G., Lazzaro F., Giannattasio M., Plevani P., Muzi-Falconi M. Phosphorylation of the budding yeast 9-1-1 complex is required for Dpb11 function in the full activation of the UV-induced DNA damage checkpoint. Molecular and Cellular Biology 2008, 28:4782-4793.
118. Pfander B., Diffley J.F. Dpb11 coordinates Mec1 kinase activation with cell cycle-regulated Rad9 recruitment. EMBO Journal 2011, 30:4897-4907.
119. Nakada D., Hirano Y., Sugimoto K. Requirement of the Mre11 complex and exonuclease 1 for activation of the Mec1 signaling pathway. Molecular and Cellular Biology 2004, 24:10016-10025.
120. Adams K.E., Medhurst A.L., Dart D., Lakin N.D. Recruitment of ATR to sites of ionising radiation-induced DNA damage requires ATM and components of the MRN protein complex. Oncogene 2006, 25:3894-3904.
121. Duursma A.M., Driscoll R., Elias J.E., Cimprich K.A. A role for the MRN complex in ATR activation via TOPBP1 recruitment. Molecular Cell 2013, 50:116-122.
122. Shiotani B., Nguyen H.D., Håkansson P., Maréchal A., Tse A., Tahara H., Zou L. Two distinct modes of ATR activation orchestrated by Rad17 and Nbs1. Cell Reports 2013, 3:1651-1662.
123. Shiotani B., Zou L. Single-stranded DNA orchestrates an ATM-to-ATR switch at DNA breaks. Molecular Cell 2009, 33:547-558.
124. Mantiero D., Clerici M., Lucchini G., Longhese M.P. Dual role for Saccharomyces cerevisiae Tel1 in the checkpoint response to double-strand breaks. EMBO Reports 2007, 8:380-387.
125. Myers J.S., Cortez D. Rapid activation of ATR by ionizing radiation requires ATM and Mre11. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2006, 281:9346-9350.
126. Martina M., Clerici M., Baldo V., Bonetti D., Lucchini G., Longhese M.P. A balance between Tel1 and Rif2 activities regulates nucleolytic processing and elongation at telomeres. Molecular and Cellular Biology 2012, 32:1604-1617.
127. Usui T., Ogawa H., Petrini J.H. A DNA damage response pathway controlled by Tel1 and the Mre11 complex. Molecular Cell 2001, 7:1255-1266.
128. Clerici M., Mantiero D., Lucchini G., Longhese M.P. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sae2 protein negatively regulates DNA damage checkpoint signaling. EMBO Reports 2006, 7:212-218.
129. Baroni E., Viscardi V., Cartagena-Lirola H., Lucchini G., Longhese M.P. The functions of budding yeast Sae2 in the DNA damage response require Mec1- and Tel1-dependent phosphorylation. Molecular and Cellular Biology 2004, 24:4151-4165.
130. Cartagena-Lirola H., Guerini I., Viscardi V., Lucchini G., Longhese M.P. Budding yeast Sae2 is an in vivo target of the Mec1 and Tel1 checkpoint kinases during meiosis. Cell Cycle 2006, 5:1549-1559.
131. Morin I., Ngo H.P., Greenall A., Zubko M.K., Morrice N., Lydall D. Checkpoint-dependent phosphorylation of Exo1 modulates the DNA damage response. EMBO Journal 2008, 27:2400-2410.