Cooperative learning: Integrating theory and practice

Cooperative Learning: Integrating Theory and Practice

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 1-273

  Gillies, Robyn M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84949792453     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781483329598     Document Type: Book

References (264)

1. Abrams, L., Pedulla, J., & Madaus, G. (2003). Views from the classroom: teachers' opinions of statewide testing programs. Theory Into Practice, 42(1), 18-29. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4201_4 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4201_4
2. Slavin, R. (1999). Comprehensive approaches to cooperative learning. Theory Into Practice, 38, 74-79. doi:10.1080/00405849909543835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00405849909543835
3. Sloane, F., & Kelly, A. (2003). Issues in high-stakes testing programs. Theory Into Practice, 42, 12-17. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4201_3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4201_3
4. Gillies, R., & Ashman, A. (Eds.). (2003). Cooperative learning: The social and intellectual outcomes of learning in groups. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
5. Jacobs, G., Power, M., & Inn, L. W. (2002). The teacher's sourcebook for cooperative learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6. Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (2003). Assessing students in groups: Promoting group responsibility and Individual Accountability. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7. Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (1999). Making cooperative learning work. Theory Into Practice, 38, 67-73. doi:10.1080/00405849909543834 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00405849909543834
8. Gillies, R. (2005). The effects of communication training on teachers' and students' verbal behaviors during cooperative learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 41, 257-279. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2005.07.004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2005.07.004
9. Gillies, R., & Boyle, M. (2006). Ten Australian elementary teachers' discourse and reported pedagogical practices during cooperative learning. Elementary Journal, 106(5), 429-451. doi:10.1086/505439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/505439
10. King, A. (2002). Structuring peer interaction to promote high-level cognitive processing. Theory Into Practice, 41, 33-40. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4101_6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4101_6
11. King, A. (2002). Structuring peer-interaction to promote high-level cognitive processing. Theory Into Practice, 41, 33-40. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4101_6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4101_6
12. O'Donnell, A., & King, A. (Eds.). (1999). Cognitive perspectives on peer learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13. Palincsar, A., & Herrenkohl, L. (2002). Designing collaborative contexts. Theory Into Practice, 41, 26-35. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4101_5 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4101_5
14. Cohen, E., Lotan, R., Scarloss, B., & Arellano, A. (1999). Complex instruction: Equity in cooperative learning classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 38, 80-86. doi:10.1080/00405849909543836 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00405849909543836
15. Gillies, R., & Boyle, M. (2006). Ten Australian elementary teachers' discourse and reported pedagogical practices during cooperative learning. Elementary School Journal, 106(5), 429-451. doi:10.1086/505439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/505439
16. Mercer, N., Fernandez, M., Dawes, L., Wegerif, R., & Sams, C. (2003). Talk about texts at the computer: Using ICT to develop children's oral and literate abilities. Reading Literacy and Language, 37, 81-89. doi:10.1111/1467-9345.3702006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9345.3702006
17. Webb, N., Farivar, S., & Mastergeorge, A. (2002). Productive helping in cooperative groups. Theory Into Practice, 41, 13-20. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4101_3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4101_3
18. Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2004). Working inside the black box: Assessment for learning in the classroom. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(1), 8.
19. Stiggins, R. (2002). Assessment crisis: The absence of assessment FOR learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(10), 758.
20. Stiggins, R. (2005). From formative assessment to assessment FOR learning: A path to success in standards-based schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 87(4), 324-330.
21. Cohen, E., Lotan, R., Abram, P., Scarloss, B., & Schultz, S. (2002). Can groups learn? Teachers College Record, 104, 1045-1068. doi:10.1111/1467-9620.00196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9620.00196
22. Emmer, E., & Gerwels, M. (2002). Cooperative learning in elementary classrooms: Teaching practices and lesson characteristics. Elementary School Journal, 103, 75-92. doi:10.1086/499716 http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/499716
23. Gillies, R., & Boyle, M. (2006). Ten Australian elementary teachers' discourse and reported pedagogical practices during cooperative learning. Elementary Journal, 106(5), 429-451. doi:10.1086/505439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/505439
24. Webb, N., & Mastergeorge, A. (2003). Promoting effective helping in peer-directed groups. International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 73-97. doi:10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00074-0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355%2803%2900074-0
25. Allington, R., Johnson, P., & Day, J. (2002). Exemplary fourth-grade teachers. Language Arts, 79(6), 462-466.
26. Burris, C. (2005). A special section on the achievement gap-Closing the achievement gap by detracking. Phi Delta Kappan, 86, 594-602.
27. Hershberg, T. (2005). Value-added assessment and systemic reform: A response to the challenge of human capital development. Phi Delta Kappan, 87, 276-284.
28. McCombs, B. (2001, Spring). What do we know about learners and learning? The learner-centered framework: Bringing the educational system into balance. Educational Horizons, pp. 182-193.
29. About CSR. (2004). Retrieved March 25, 2006, from the U.S. Department of Education Web site: http://www.ed.gov/print/programs/compreform/2pager.html
30. Abrami, P. (2001). Understanding and promoting complex learning using technology. Educational Research and Evaluation, 7, 113-136. doi:10.1076/edre.7.2.113.3864 http://dx.doi.org/10.1076/edre.7.2.113.3864
31. Abrami, P., Chambers, B., Poulsen, C., DeSimone, C., & Howden, J. (1995). Classroom connections: Understanding and using cooperative learning. Montreal: Harcourt Brace.
32. Abrams, L., Pedulla, J., & Madaus, G. (2003). Views from the classroom: teachers' opinions of statewide testing programs. Theory Into Practice, 42(1), 18-29. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4201_4 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4201_4
33. Alfassi, M. (1998). Reading for meaning: The efficacy of reciprocal teaching in high school students in remedial reading classes. American Educational Research Journal, 35, 309-332. doi:10.3102/00028312035002309 http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00028312035002309
34. Allington, R., Johnson, P., & Day, J. (2002). Exemplary fourth-grade teachers. Language Arts, 79(6), 462-466.
35. Almog, T., & Hertz-Lazrowitz, R. (1999). Teachers as peer learners: Professional development in an advanced computer learning environment. In A.O'Donnell & A.King (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning (pp. 285-311). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
36. Antil, L., Jenkins, J., Wayne, S., & Vadasy, P. (1998). Cooperative learning: Conceptualizations, and the relation between research and practice. American Educational Research Journal, 35, 419-454. doi:10.3102/00028312035003419 http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00028312035003419
37. Ayres, P., Sawyer, W., & Dinham, S. (2004). Effective teaching in the context of a grade 12 high-stakes external examination in New South Wales, Australia. British Educational Research Journal, 30, 141-165. doi:10.1080/01411920310001630008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01411920310001630008
38. Bales, R. (1970). Personality and interpersonal behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
39. Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1-26. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
40. Battistich, V., & Watson, M. (2003). Fostering social development in preschool and the early elementary grades through cooperative classroom activities. In R.Gillies & A.Ashman (Eds.), Cooperative learning: The social and intellectual outcomes of learning in groups (pp. 19-35). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
41. Becker, W., & Camine, D. (1980). Direct instruction: An effective approach to educational intervention with the disadvantaged and low performers. In B. B.Lahey & A.Kazdin (Eds.), Advances in clinical child psychology (pp. 429-473). New York: Plenum. doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-9805-9_11 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9805-9_11
42. Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2004). Working inside the black box: Assessment for learning in the classroom. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(1), 8.
43. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998a). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Learning, 5, 7-74.
44. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998b). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139.
45. Bloom, B., Kengelhart, M., Furst, E., Hill, W., & Krathwohl, D. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook 1: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay.
46. Boekaerts, M., & Corno, L. (2005). Self-regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54, 199-231. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2005.00205.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2005.00205.x
47. Borman, G., Hewes, G., Overman, L., & Brown, S. (2003). Comprehensive school reform and achievement: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 73(2), 125-230. doi:10.3102/00346543073002125 http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543073002125
48. Borman, G., & Slavin, R. (2005). Success for all: First-year results from the national randomized field trial. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 27, 1-22. doi:10.3102/01623737027001001 http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/01623737027001001
49. Borman, G., Slavin, R., Cheung, A., Chamberlain, A., Madden, N., & Chambers, B. (2005). Success for all: First-year results from the national randomized field trial. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 27, 1-22. doi:10.3102/01623737027001001 http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/01623737027001001
50. Boxtel, C., van der Linden, J., Roelofs, E., & Erkens, G. (2002). Collaborative concept mapping provoking and supporting meaningful discourse. Theory Into Practice, 41(1), 40-46. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4101_7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4101_7
51. Brown, A., & Palincsar, A. (1988). Guided, cooperative learning and individual knowledge acquisition. In L.Resnick (Ed.), Cognition and instruction: Issues and agendas. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
52. Brown, J., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1988). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42. doi:10.3102/0013189X018001032 http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0013189X018001032
53. Brush, T., & Saye, J. (2001). The use of embedded scaffolds with hypermedia-supported student-centered learning. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 10, 333-356.
54. Bryant, D., Vaughn, S., Linan-Thompson, S., Ugel, N., Hamff, A., & Hougen, M. (2000). Learning Disability Quarterly, 23(4), 238-252. doi:10.2307/1511347 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1511347
55. Cazden, D. (1983). Peekaboo as an instructional model: Discourse development at school and at home. In B.Bain (Ed.), The sociogenesis of language and human conduct: A multidisciplinary book of readings. New York: Plenum.
56. Chambers, B., Abrami, P., McWhaw, K., & Therrien, M. (2001). Developing a computer-assisted tutoring program to help children at risk learn to read. Educational Research and Evaluation, 7, 223-239. doi:10.1076/edre.7.2.223.3863 http://dx.doi.org/10.1076/edre.7.2.223.3863
57. Chinn, C., O'Donnell, A., & Jinks, T. (2000). The structure of discourse in collaborative learning. Journal of Experimental Education, 69, 77-89. doi:10.1080/00220970009600650 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220970009600650
58. Christensen, C., Aaron, S., & Clark, W. (2005). Can schools improve? Phi Delta Kappan, 86(7), 545-553.
59. Cohen, E. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64, 1-35. doi:10.3102/00346543064001001 http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543064001001
60. Cohen, E. (1998). Making cooperative learning equitable. Educational Leadership, 56, 18-21.
61. Cohen, E., & Lotan, R. (1995). Producing equal-status interaction in the heterogeneous classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 99-120. doi:10.3102/00028312032001099 http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00028312032001099
62. Cohen, E., Lotan, R., Abram, P., Scarloss, B., & Schultz, S. (2002). Can groups learn? Teachers College Record, 104, 1045-1068. doi:10.1111/1467-9620.00196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9620.00196
63. Cohen, E., Lotan, R., & Catanzarite, L. (1990). Treating status problems in the cooperative classroom. In S.Sharan (Ed.), Cooperative learning theory and research (pp. 203-229). New York: Praeger.
64. Cohen, E., Lotan, R., & Leechor, C. (1989). Can classrooms learn? Sociology of Education, 62, 75-94. doi:10.2307/2112841 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2112841
65. Cohen, E., Lotan, R., Scarloss, B., & Arellano, A. (1999). Complex instruction: Equity in cooperative learning classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 38, 80-86. doi:10.1080/00405849909543836 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00405849909543836
66. Comer, J. (2005). Child and adolescent development: The critical missing focus in school reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(10), 757-766.
67. Comprehensive School Reform Program. (2004). Retrieved March 25, 2006, from the U.S. Department of Education Web Site: http://www.ed.gov/programs/compreform/gtepcomprefom.pdf
68. Cowie, H., & Berdondini, L. (2001). Children's reactions to cooperative group work: A strategy for enhancing peer relationships among bullies, victims, and bystanders. Learning and Instruction, 11, 517-530. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00006-8 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752%2801%2900006-8
69. Cuban, L. (2004). Assessing the 20-year impact of multiple intelligences on schooling. Teachers College Record, 106, 140-146. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2004.00324.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2004.00324.x
70. Damon, W. (1984). Peer education: The untapped potential. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 5, 331-343. doi:10.1016/0193-3973(84)90006-6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0193-3973%2884%2990006-6
71. Damon, W., & Phelps, W. (1989). Critical distinctions among three approaches to peer education. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 9-19. doi:10.1016/0883-0355(89)90013-X http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0883-0355%2889%2990013-X
72. Darling-Hammond, L., & Snyder, J. (2000). Authentic assessment of teaching in context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 525-545. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00015-9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X%2800%2900015-9
73. DeJong, F. (1995). Process-oriented instruction: Some considerations. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 10(4), 317-323. doi:10.1007/BF03172924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03172924
74. Desoete, A., Roeyers, H., & De Clercq, A. (2003). Can offline metacognition enhance mathematical problem solving? Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 188-200. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.188
75. Deutsch, M. (1949). A theory of co-operation and competition. Human Relations, 11, 129-152. doi:10.1177/001872674900200204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001872674900200204
76. Doise, W. (1990). The development of individual competencies through social interaction. In H.Foot, M.Morgan, & R.Schute (Eds.), Children helping children (pp. 43-64). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
77. Doise, W., & Mugny, G. (1984). The social development of the intellect. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
78. Dolezal, S., Welsh, L., Pressley, M., & Vincent, M. (2003). How nine third-grade teachers motivate student engagement. Elementary School Journal, 103, 239-267. doi:10.1086/499725 http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/499725
79. Emmer, E., & Gerwels, M. (2002). Cooperative learning in elementary classrooms: Teaching practices and lesson characteristics. Elementary School Journal, 103, 75-92. doi:10.1086/499716 http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/499716
80. Engel, M., Pulley, R., & Rybinski, A. (2003). Authentic assessment: It really works. Master's action research project, Saint Xavier University and Skylight. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service Number ED 479 959) Available online from: http://eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2/content_storage_01/0000000b/80/23/24/cf.pdf
81. Executive summary. (2004). Retrieved June 24, 2006, from the U.S. Department of Education Web site: http://www.ed.gov/print/nclb/overview/intro/execsumm.html
82. The facts about… math achievement. (2004). Retrieved January 28, 2006, from the U.S. Department of Education Web Site: http://www.ed.gov/print/nclb/methods/math/math.html
83. The facts about… science achievement. (2004). Retrieved January 28, 2006, from the U.S. Department of Education Web site: http://www.ed.gov/print/nclb/methods/science/science.html
84. Felner, R., Jackson, A., Kasak, D., & Mulhall, P. (1997). The impact of school reform for the middle years. Phi Delta Kappan, 78(7), 528-543.
85. Foley, K., & O'Donnell, A. (2002). Cooperative learning and visual organisers: Effects on solving mole problems in high school chemistry. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 22, 38-50. doi:10.1080/0218879020220105 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0218879020220105
86. Fuchs, L., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C., Phillips, N., Karns, K., & Dutka, S. (1997). Enhancing students' helping behavior with conceptual mathematical explanations. Elementary School Journal, 97, 223-249. doi:10.1086/461863 http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/461863
87. Fullan, M. (1998). Breaking the bonds of dependency. Educational Leadership, 55(7), 6-11.
88. Gage, N., & Berliner, D. (1998). Educational psychology (6th ed.). New York: Houghton Mifflin.
89. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
90. Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. New York: Basic Books.
91. Gillespie, C., Ford, K., Gillespie, R., & Leavell, A. (1996). Portfolio assessment. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 39, 480-491.
92. Gillies, R. (2003a). The behaviors, interactions, and perceptions of junior high school students during small-group learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 137-147. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.137 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.137
93. Gillies, R. (2003b). Structuring cooperative group work in classrooms. International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 35-49. doi:10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00072-7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355%2803%2900072-7
94. Gillies, R. (2003c). Structuring cooperative learning experiences in primary school. In R.Gillies & A.Ashman (Eds.), Cooperative learning: The social and intellectual outcomes of learning in groups (pp. 36-53). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
95. Gillies, R. (2004a). The effects of communication training on teachers' and students' verbal behaviours during cooperative learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 41, 257-279. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2005.07.004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2005.07.004
96. Gillies, R. (2004b). The effects of cooperative learning on junior high school students during small group learning. Learning and Instruction, 14, 197-213. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(03)00068-9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752%2803%2900068-9
97. Gillies, R. (2006). teachers' and students' verbal behaviours during cooperative and small-group learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 271-287. doi:10.1348/000709905X52337 http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/000709905X52337
98. Gillies, R., & Ashman, A. (1995). The effects of gender and ability on students' behaviours and interactions in classroom-based work groups. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 65, 211-225. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1995.tb01143.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1995.tb01143.x
99. Gillies, R., & Ashman, A. (1996). Teaching collaborative skills to primary school children in classroom-based work groups. Learning and Instruction, 6, 187-200. doi:10.1016/0959-4752(96)00002-3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752%2896%2900002-3
100. Gillies, R., & Ashman, A. (1998). Behavior and interactions of children in cooperative groups in lower and middle elementary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 746-757. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.90.4.746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.90.4.746
101. Gillies, R., & Boyle, M. (2005). teachers' scaffolding behaviours during cooperative learning. Asia Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 33, 243-259. doi:10.1080/13598660500286242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13598660500286242
102. Gillies, R., & Boyle, M. (2006). Ten Australian elementary teachers' discourse and reported pedagogical practices during cooperative learning. Elementary Journal, 106(5), 429-451. doi:10.1086/505439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/505439
103. Goddard, R., Hoy, W., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2004). Collective efficacy beliefs: Theoretical developments, empirical evidence, and future directions. Educational Researcher, 33, 3-14. doi:10.3102/0013189X033003003 http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033003003
104. Good, T., Burross, H., & Mccaslin, M. (2005). Comprehensive school reform: A longitudinal study of school improvement in one state. Teachers College Record, 107(10), 2205-2226. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2005.00589.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2005.00589.x
105. Graham, S., & Harris, K. (2005). Improving the writing performance of young struggling writers: Theoretical and programmatic research from the Center on Accelerating Student Learning. Journal of Special Education, 39, 19-34. doi:10.1177/00224669050390010301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00224669050390010301
106. Graham, S., Harris, K., & Mason, L. (2005). Improving the writing performance, knowledge, and self-efficacy of struggling young writers: The effects of self-regulated strategy development. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 207-241. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.08.001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.08.001
107. Graves, A., Plasencia-Peinado, J., Deno, S., & Johnson, J. (2005). Formatively evaluating the reading progress of first-grade English learners in multiple-language classrooms. Remedial and Special Education, 26, 215-225. doi:10.1177/07419325050260040401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/07419325050260040401
108. Green, C., & Tanner, R. (2005). Multiple intelligences and online teacher education. ELT Journal, 59(4), 312-321. doi:10.1093/elt/cci060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/cci060
109. Gulikers, J., Bastiaens, T., & Kirschner, P. (2004). A five-dimensional framework for authentic assessment. Education Technology, Research and Development, 52(3), 67-86. doi:10.1007/BF02504676 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02504676
110. Guskey, T. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Perspectives, 8, 381-391. doi:10.1080/135406002100000512 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/135406002100000512
111. Hackmann, D., & Schmitt, D. (1997). Strategies for teaching in a block-of-time schedule. National Association for Secondary School Principals (NASSP) Bulletin, 81, 588-596.
112. Hart, E., & Speece, D. (1998). Reciprocal teaching goes to college: Effects for postsecondary students at risk for academic failure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 670-681. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.90.4.670 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.90.4.670
113. Hartup, W., & Stevens, N. (1997). Friendships and adaptation in the life course. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 355-370. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.121.3.355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.121.3.355
114. Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2000). An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 48, 23-48. doi:10.1007/BF02319856 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02319856
115. Hertz-Lazarowitz, R. (1992). Understanding interactive behaviors: Looking at six mirrors of the classroom. In R.Hertz-Lazarowitz & N.Miller (Eds.), Interaction in cooperative groups: The theoretical anatomy of group learning (pp. 71-101). New York: Cambridge University Press.
116. Hertz-Lazarowitz, R. (2004). Storybook writing in first grade. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17, 267-299. doi:10.1023/B:READ.0000017689.04775.b7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:READ.0000017689.04775.b7
117. Hertz-Lazarowitz, R., & Shachar, H. (1990). teachers' verbal behavior in cooperative and whole-class instruction. In S.Sharan (Ed.), Cooperative learning: Theory and research (pp. 77-94). New York: Praeger.
118. Hickey, M. (2004). Can I pick more than one project? Case studies of five teachers who used MI-based instructional planning. Teachers College Record, 106, 77-86. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2004.00320.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2004.00320.x
119. Hmelo-Silver, C. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16, 235-266. doi:10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3
120. Hoerr, T. (2004). How MI informs teaching at New City school. Teachers College Record, 106, 40-48. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2004.00316.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2004.00316.x
121. Hoffman, J., Assaf, L., & Paris, S. (2001). High-stakes testing in reading: Today in Texas, tomorrow? Reading Teacher, 54(5), 482-494.
122. Hunt, P., Staub, D., Alwell, M., & Goetz, L. (1994). Achievement by all students within the context of cooperative learning groups. Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps [JASH], 19, 290-301.
123. Hunt, T. (2005). Education reforms: Lessons from history. Phi Delta Kappan, 87(1), 84-96.
124. Ivey, A., & Bradford Ivey, M. (2003). Intentional interviewing and counselling: Facilitating client development in a multicultural society. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
125. Jenkins, J., Antil, L., Wayne, S., & Vadasy, P. (2003). How cooperative learning works for special education and remedial students. Exceptional Children, 69, 279-292.
126. Johnson, D. (2003). Social interdependence: Interrelationships among theory, research, and practice. American Psychologist, 58, 934-945. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.58.11.934 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.58.11.934
127. Johnson, D., & Johnson, F. (2003). Joining together: Group theory and group skills (8th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
128. Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
129. Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (1990). Cooperative learning and achievement. In S.Sharan (Ed.), Cooperative learning: Theory and research (pp. 23-37). New York: Praeger.
130. Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (1999). Making cooperative learning work. Theory Into Practice, 38, 67-73. doi:10.1080/00405849909543834 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00405849909543834
131. Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (2000). Cooperative learning, values, and culturally plural classrooms. In M.Leicester, C.Modgil, & S.Modgil (Eds.), Classroom issues: Practice, pedagogy and curriculum (pp. 15-28). London: Falmer Press.
132. Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (2002). Learning together and alone: Overview and meta-analysis. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 22, 95-105. doi:10.1080/0218879020220110 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0218879020220110
133. Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (2003). Student motivation in cooperative groups: Social interdependence theory. In R.Gillies & A.Ashman (Eds.), Cooperative learning: The social and intellectual outcomes of learning in groups (pp. 136-176). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
134. Johnson, D., Johnson, R., & Holubec, E. (1990). Circles of learning (3rd ed.). Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
135. Johnson, D., Johnson, R., & Stanne, M. (1989). Impact of goal and resource interdependence on problem-solving success. Journal of Social Psychology, 129, 621-629. doi:10.1080/00224545.1989.9713780 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1989.9713780
136. Johnson, D., Johnson, R., & Stanne, M. (2000). Cooperative learning methods: A meta-analysis. Retrieved January 29, 2001, from http://www.clcrc.com/pages/cl-methods.html
137. Johnson, D., Johnson, R., Stanne, M., & Garibaldi, A. (1990). Impact of group processing on achievement in cooperative groups. Journal of Social Psychology, 130, 507-516. doi:10.1080/00224545.1990.9924613 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1990.9924613
138. Jordan, D., & Le Metaias, J. (1997). Social skilling through cooperative learning. Educational Research, 39, 3-21. doi:10.1080/0013188970390101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0013188970390101
139. Kagan, S., & Kagan, M. (1994). The structural approach: Six keys to cooperative learning. In S.Sharan (Ed.), Handbook of cooperative learning methods (pp. 115-133). Westport, CT: Guilford.
140. Kim, J., & Sunderman, G. (2005). Measuring academic proficiency under the No Child Left Behind Act: Implications for educational equity. Educational Researcher, 34(8), 3-13. doi:10.3102/0013189X034008003 http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0013189X034008003
141. King, A. (1990). Enhancing peer interaction and learning in the classroom through reciprocal questioning. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 664-687. doi:10.3102/00028312027004664 http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00028312027004664
142. King, A. (1994). Guided knowledge construction in the classroom: Effects of teaching children how to question and how to explain. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 338-368. doi:10.3102/00028312031002338 http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00028312031002338
143. King, A. (1997). ASK to THINK-TEL WHY: A model of transactive peer tutoring for scaffolding higher level complex learning. Educational Psychologist, 32, 221-235. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3204_3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3204_3
144. King, A. (1999). Discourse patterns for mediating peer learning. In A.O'Donnell & A.King (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning (pp. 87-116). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
145. King, A. (2002). Structuring peer interaction to promote high-level cognitive processing. Theory Into Practice, 41, 33-40. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4101_6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4101_6
146. Klinger, J., Vaughn, S., Arguelles, M., Hughes, M., & Leftwich, S. (2004). Collaborative strategic reading: Real-world lessons from classroom teachers. Remedial and Special Education, 25(5), 291-302. doi:10.1177/07419325040250050301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/07419325040250050301
147. Kluger, A., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254-284. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254
148. Kock, A., Sleegers, P., & Voeten, M. (2004). New learning and the classification of learning environments in secondary education. Review of Educational Research, 74, 141-170. doi:10.3102/00346543074002141 http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543074002141
149. Kohn, A. (2000). Burnt at the high stakes. Journal of Teacher Education, 51, 315-327. doi:10.1177/0022487100051004007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022487100051004007
150. Konings, K., Brand-Gruwel, S., & Merrienboer, J. (2005). Towards more powerful learning environments through combining the perspectives of designers, teachers, and students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 645-660. doi:10.1348/000709905X43616 http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/000709905X43616
151. Lederer, J. (2000). Reciprocal teaching of social studies in inclusive elementary classrooms. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 91-106. doi:10.1177/002221940003300112 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002221940003300112
152. Lisi, R., & Golbeck, S. (1999). Implications of Piagetian theory for peer learning. In A.O'Donnell & A.King (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning (pp. 3-38). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
153. Lou, Y., Abrami, P., & d'Apollonia, S. (2001). Small group and individual learning with technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71, 449-521. doi:10.3102/00346543071003449 http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543071003449
154. Lou, Y., Abrami, P., Spence, J., Poulsen, C., Chambers, B., & d'Apollonia, S. (1996). Within-class grouping: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66, 423-458. doi:10.3102/00346543066004423 http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543066004423
155. Lyle, S. (1999). An investigation of pupil perceptions of mixed-ability grouping to enhance literacy in children aged 9-10. Educational Studies, 25, 283-297. doi:10.1080/03055699997800 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03055699997800
156. Manset-Williamson, G., & Nelson, J. (2005). Balanced strategic reading instruction for upper-elementary and middle school students with reading disabilities: A comparative study of two approaches. Learning Disability Quarterly, 28, 59-74. doi:10.2307/4126973 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/4126973
157. Mason, L. (2004). Explicit self-regulated strategy development versus reciprocal questioning: Effects on expository reading comprehension among struggling readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 282-296. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.283 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.283
158. McCaffrey, D., Hamilton, L., Stecher, B., Klein, S., Bugliari, D., & Robyn, A. (2001). Interactions among instructional practices, curriculum, and student achievement: The case of standards-based high school mathematics. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 32, 493-517. doi:10.2307/749803 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/749803
159. McCombs, B. (2001, Spring). What do we know about learners and learning? The learner-centered framework: Bringing the educational system into balance. Educational Horizons, 182-193.
160. McInerney, D., & McInerney, V. (1998). Educational psychology: Constructing learning (4th ed.). Frenchs Forest, N.S.W: Pearson Education.
161. McInerney, D., & McInerney, V. (2002). Educational psychology: Constructing learning (3rd ed.). Sydney: Prentice Hall.
162. McMaster, K., & Fuchs, D. (2002). Effects of cooperative learning on the academic achievement of students with learning disabilities: An update on Tateyama-Sniezek's review. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 17, 107-117. doi:10.1111/1540-5826.00037 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1540-5826.00037
163. McWhaw, K., Schnackenberg, H., Sclater, J., & Abrami, P. (2003). From cooperation to collaboration: Helping students become collaborative learners. In R.Gillies & A.Ashman (Eds.), Cooperative learning: The social and intellectual outcomes of learning in groups (pp. 69-86). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
164. Meisinger, E., Schwanenflugel, P., Bradley, B., & Stahl, S. (2004). Interaction quality during partner reading. Journal of Literacy Research, 36, 111-140. doi:10.1207/s15548430jlr3602_1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15548430jlr3602_1
165. Meloth, M., & Deering, P. (1999). The role of the teacher in promoting cognitive processing during collaborative learning. In A.O'Donnell & A.King (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning (pp. 235-255). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
166. Mercer, N. (1996). The quality of talk in children's collaborative activity in the classroom. Learning and Instruction, 6, 359-377. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(96)00021-7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752%2896%2900021-7
167. Mercer, N., Fernandez, M., Dawes, L., Wegerif, R., & Sams, C. (2003). Talk about texts at the computer: Using ICT to develop children's oral and literate abilities. Reading Literacy and Language, 37, 81-89. doi:10.1111/1467-9345.3702006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9345.3702006
168. Mercer, N., Wegerif, R., & Dawes, L. (1999). Children's talk and the development of reasoning in the classroom. British Educational Research Journal, 25, 95-111. doi:10.1080/0141192990250107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0141192990250107
169. Micklo, S. (1997). Math portfolios in the primary grades. Childhood Education, 73(4), 194-199. doi:10.1080/00094056.1997.10521092 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00094056.1997.10521092
170. Miller, N., & Harrington, H. (1990). A situational identity perspective on cultural diversity and teamwork in the classroom. In S.Sharan (Ed.), Cooperative learning: Theory and research (pp. 39-75). New York: Praeger.
171. Mitchell, S., Reilley, R., Bramwell, F., Solnosky, A., & Lilly, F. (2004). Friendship and choosing groupmates: Preferences for teacher-selected vs. student-selected groupings in high school science classes. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 31, 20-32.
172. Mugny, G., & Carugati, F. (1989). Social representations of intelligence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
173. Mugny, G., & Doise, W. (1978). Socio-cognitive conflict and structure of individual and collective performances. European Journal of Social Psychology, 8, 181-192. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420080204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420080204
174. National Center for Education Statistics. (2005). Retrieved November 2, 2005, from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/2005/charts
175. National Center for Fair & Open Testing (2005). The limits of standardized tests for diagnosing and assisting student learning. Retrieved October 30, 2006, http://www.fairtest.org/facts/Limits%20of%20Tests.html
176. National trends in mathematics by percentiles. (2005). National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved January 30, 2006, from the National Center for Education Statistics Web site: http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/ltt/results2004/nat-math-percentile.asp
177. National trends in reading by percentiles. (2005). National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved January 30, 2006, from the National Center for Education
178. Statistics Web site: http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/ltt/results2004/nat-reading-percentile.asp
179. Nelson-Le Gall, S., & DeCooke, P. (1987). Same-sex and cross-sex help exchanges in the classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 67-71. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.79.1.67 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.79.1.67
180. Newcomb, A., & Bagwell, C. (1995). Children's friendship relations: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 306-347. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.306 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.306
181. O'Donnell, A. (1999). Structuring dyadic interaction through scripted cooperation. In A.O'Donnell & A.King (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning (pp. 179-196). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
182. O'Donnell, A., & Dansereau, D. (2000). Interactive effects of prior knowledge and material format on cooperative teaching. Journal of Experimental Education, 68(2), 101-118. doi:10.1080/00220970009598497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220970009598497
183. O'Donnell, A., Dansereau, D., Hall, R., Skaggs, L., Hythecker, V., Peel, J., & Rewey, K. (1990). Learning concrete procedures: Effects of processing strategies and cooperative learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 171-177. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.171 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.171
184. O'Donnell, A., Dansereau, D., & Rocklin, T. (1987). Cognitive, social/affective, and metacognitive outcomes of scripted cooperative learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 431-437. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.79.4.431 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.79.4.431
185. Palincsar, A. (1998). Keeping the metaphor of scaffolding fresh-A response to C. Addison Stone's "The metaphor of scaffolding: Its utility for the field of learning disabilities." Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 370-373. doi:10.1177/002221949803100406 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002221949803100406
186. Palincsar, A. (1999). Designing collaborative contexts: Lessons from three research programs. In A.O'Donnell & A.King (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning (pp. 151-177). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
187. Palincsar, A., & Herrenkohl, L. (1999). Designing collaborative contexts: Lessons from three research programs. In A.O'Donnell & A.King (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning (pp. 151-177). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
188. Palincsar, A., & Herrenkohl, L. (2002). Designing collaborative contexts. Theory Into Practice, 41, 26-35. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4101_5 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4101_5
189. Paris, S., & Hoffman, J. (2004). Reading assessments in kindergarten through third grade: Findings from the centre for the improvement of early reading achievement. Elementary School Journal, 105, 199-217. doi:10.1086/428865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/428865
190. Pedersen, S., & Liu, M. (2003). teachers' beliefs about issues in the implementation of a student-centered learning environment. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 51(2), 57-76. doi:10.1007/BF02504526 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02504526
191. Pedulla, J., Abrams, L., Madaus, G., Russell, M., Ramos, M., & Miao, J. (2003). Perceived effects of state mandated testing programs on teaching and learning: Finding from a national survey of teachers. Chestnut Hill, MA: National Board on Educational Testing and the Public Policy.
192. Pentecost, T., & James, M. (2000). Creating a student-centered physical chemistry class. Journal of College Science Teaching, 30, 122-126.
193. Peterson, K. (2005). No let up in unrest over Bush school law. Retrieved January 30, 2006, from http://www.stateline.org/live/ViewPage.action?siteNodeId=137&languageID
194. Peterson, S., & Miller, J. (2004). Comparing the quality of students' experiences during cooperative learning and large-group instruction. Journal of Educational Research, 97, 123-133. doi:10.3200/JOER.97.3.123-134 http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/JOER.97.3.123-134
195. Piaget, J. (1950). The psychology of intelligence. London: Routledge & Kegan.
196. Plata, M., & Trusty, J. (2005). Effects of socioeconomic status on general and at-risk high school boys' willingness to accept same-sex peers with LD. Adolescence, 40(157), 47-66.
197. Posner, D. (2004). What's wrong with teaching to the test? Phi Delta Kappan, 85(10), 749.
198. Prins, F., Sluijsmans, D., Kirschner, P., & Strijbos, J. (2005). Formative peer assessment in a CSCL environment: A case study. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30, 417-444. doi:10.1080/02602930500099219 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602930500099219
199. Putnam, J., Markovchick, K., Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (1996). Cooperative learning and peer acceptance of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Social Psychology, 136, 741-752. doi:10.1080/00224545.1996.9712250 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1996.9712250
200. Questions and answers on NCLB-Reading. (2003). Retrieved January 28, 2006, from the U.S. Department of Education Web site: http://www.ed.gov/print/nclb/methods/reading/reading.html
201. Rahm, J. (2004). Multiple-modes of meaning making in a science center. Science Education, 88, 223-247. doi:10.1002/sce.10117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sce.10117
202. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
203. Rohrbeck, C., Ginsburg-Block, M., Fantuzzo, J., & Miller, T. (2003). Peer-assisted learning interventions with elementary school students: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 240-257. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.240 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.240
204. Rojas-Drummond, S., & Mercer, N. (2003). Scaffolding the development of effective collaboration and learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 99-111. doi:10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00075-2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355%2803%2900075-2
205. Roseth, C., Johnson, D., Johnson, R., & Fang, F. (2006, April). Effects of cooperative learning on middle school students: A meta-analysis. Paper presented at the annual general meeting of the American Education Research Association, San Francisco.
206. Ross, J. (1995). Effects of feedback on student behavior in cooperative learning groups in a Grade 7 math class. Elementary School Journal, 96, 125-143. doi:10.1086/461818 http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/461818
207. Rutter, M., & Maughn, B. (2002). School effectiveness findings 1979-2002. Journal of School Psychology, 40, 451-475. doi:10.1016/S0022-4405(02)00124-3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4405%2802%2900124-3
208. Ryan, J., Reid, R., & Epstein, M. (2004). Peer-mediated intervention studies on academic achievement for students with EBD. Remedial and Special Education, 25, 330-341. doi:10.1177/07419325040250060101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/07419325040250060101
209. Saenz, L., Fuchs, L., & Fuchs, D. (2005). Peer-assisted learning strategies for English language learners with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 71, 231-247.
210. Sahlberg, P., & Berry, J. (2002). One and one is sometimes three in small group mathematics learning. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 22, 82-94. doi:10.1080/0218879020220109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0218879020220109
211. Sammons, P., Hillman, J., & Mortimore, P. (1995). Key characteristics of effective schools: A review of school effectiveness research. London: Office of Standards in Education.
212. Shachar, H. (1997). Effects of a school change project on teachers' satisfaction with their work and their perceptions of teaching difficulties. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13, 799-813. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(97)00026-7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X%2897%2900026-7
213. Shachar, H. (2003). Who gains what from cooperative learning: An overview of eight studies. In R.Gillies & A.Ashman (Eds.), Cooperative learning: The social and intellectual outcomes of learning in groups (pp. 103-118). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
214. Shachar, H., & Sharan, S. (1994). Talking, relating, and achieving: Effects of cooperative learning and whole-class instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 12, 313-353. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1204_2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1204_2
215. Sharan, S. (1990). Cooperative learning and helping behaviour in the multi-ethnic classroom. In H.Foot, M.Morgan, & R.Shute (Eds.), Children helping children (pp. 151-176). London: Wiley.
216. Sharan, S., & Shaulov, A. (1990). Cooperative learning, motivation to learn, and academic achievement. In S.Sharan (Ed.), Cooperative learning: Theory and research (pp. 173-202). New York: Praeger.
217. Simons, R., Van der Linden, J., & Duffy, T. (Eds.). (2000). New learning. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
218. Slavin, R. (1996). Research on cooperative learning and achievement: What we know, what we need to know. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 43-69. doi:10.1006/ceps.1996.0004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1996.0004
219. Slavin, R. (1999). Comprehensive approaches to cooperative learning. Theory Into Practice, 38, 74-79. doi:10.1080/00405849909543835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00405849909543835
220. Slavin, R. (2004a). Built to last: Long-term maintenance of Success for All. Remedial and Special Education, 25(1), 61-66. doi:10.1177/07419325040250010701 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/07419325040250010701
221. Slavin, R. (2004b). Education research can and must address "What works" questions. Educational Researcher, 33(1), 27-28. doi:10.3102/0013189X033001027 http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033001027
222. Slavin, R., & Cooper, R. (1999). Improving intergroup relations: Lessons learned from cooperative programs. Journal of Special Issues, 55, 647-663. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00140
223. Smeets, E., & Mooij, T. (2001). Pupil-centred learning, ICT, and teacher behaviour: Observations in educational practice. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32, 403-417. doi:10.1111/1467-8535.00210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8535.00210
224. Sroufe, L., Bennett, C., Engluns, M., Urban, S., & Schulman, S. (1993). The significance of gender boundaries in preadolescence: Contemporary correlates and antecedents of boundary violation and maintenance. Child Development, 64, 455-466. doi:10.2307/1131262 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1131262
225. Stevahn, L., Johnson, D., Johnson, R., Green, K., & Laginski, A. (1997). Effects on high school students of conflict resolution training integrated into English literature. Journal of Social Psychology, 137, 302-315. doi:10.1080/00224549709595442 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224549709595442
226. Stevens, R. (2003). Student team reading and writing: A cooperative learning approach to middle school literacy instruction. Educational Research and Evaluation, 9, 137-160. doi:10.1076/edre.9.2.137.14212 http://dx.doi.org/10.1076/edre.9.2.137.14212
227. Stevens, R., & Slavin, R. (1995). The cooperative elementary school: Effects on students' achievement, attitudes, and social relations. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 321-351. doi:10.3102/00028312032002321 http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00028312032002321
228. Stiggins, R. (2002). Assessment crisis: The absence of assessment FOR learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(10), 758.
229. Stiggins, R. (2005). From formative assessment to assessment FOR learning: A path to success in standards-based schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 87(4), 324-330.
230. Strough, J., Swenson, L., & Cheng, S. (2001). Friendship, gender, and preadolescents' representations of peer collaboration. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 47, 475-500. doi:10.1353/mpq.2001.0025 http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/mpq.2001.0025
231. Taylor, B., Pressley, M., & Pearson, D. (2000). Effective teachers and schools: Trends across recent studies. Washington, DC: National Education Association.
232. Terwel, J. (2003). Cooperative learning in secondary education: A curriculum perspective. In R.Gillies & A.Ashman (Eds.), Cooperative learning: The social and intellectual outcomes of learning in groups (pp. 54-68). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
233. Topping, K. (2005). Trends in peer learning. Educational Psychology, 25, 631-645. doi:10.1080/01443410500345172 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01443410500345172
234. Topping, K., & Ehly, S. (2001). Peer assisted learning: A framework for consultation. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 12, 113-132. doi:10.1207/S1532768XJEPC1202_03 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S1532768XJEPC1202_03
235. Topping, K., Smith, E., Swanson, I., & Elliot, A. (2000). Formative peer assessment of academic writing between postgraduate students. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 25, 149-166. doi:10.1080/713611428 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/713611428
236. Tuckman, B. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 384-399. doi:10.1037/h0022100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0022100
237. Turner, J., Midgley, C., Meyer, D., Gheen, M., Anderman, E., Kang, Y., & Patrick, H. (2002). The classroom environment and students' reports of avoidance strategies in mathematics: A multimodal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 88-106. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.1.88 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.1.88
238. U.S. Department of Education. (2001). No Child Left Behind. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of the Secretary.
239. Varrella, G. (2000). Science teachers at the top of their game: What is teacher expertise? Clearing House, 74(1), 43-45.
240. Vaughn, S., Klingner, J., & Bryant, D. (2001). Collaborative strategic reading as a means to enhance peer-mediated instruction for reading comprehension and content-area learning. Remedial and Special Education, 22, 66-74. doi:10.1177/074193250102200201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/074193250102200201
241. Vermette, P., Harper, L., & DiMillo, S. (2004). Cooperative and collaborative learning… with 4-8 year olds: How does research support teachers' practice? Journal of Instructional Psychology, 31(2), 130-134.
242. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
243. Walker, V. (2000). Valued segregated schools for African American children in the south, 1935-1969: A review of common themes and characteristics. Review of Educational Research, 70, 253-285. doi:10.3102/00346543070003253 http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543070003253
244. Warfield, J., Wood, T., & Lehman, J. (2005). Autonomy, beliefs and learning of elementary mathematics teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 439-456. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2005.01.011 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.01.011
245. Webb, N. (1984). Sex differences in interaction and achievement in cooperative small groups. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 33-44. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.76.1.33 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.76.1.33
246. Webb, N. (1985). Student interaction and learning in small groups: A research summary. In R.Slavin, S.Sharon, S.Kagan, R.Hertz-Lazarowitz, C.Webb, & R.Schmuck (Eds.), Learning to cooperate, cooperating to learn (pp. 5-15). New York: Plenum. doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-3650-9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3650-9
247. Webb, N. (1991). Task-related verbal interaction and mathematics learning in small groups. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22, 366-389. doi:10.2307/749186 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/749186
248. Webb, N. (1992). Testing a theoretical model of student interaction and learning in small groups. In R.Hertz-Lazarowitz & N.Miller (Eds.), Interaction in cooperative groups (pp. 102-119). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
249. Webb, N., & Farivar, S. (1994). Promoting helping behavior in cooperative small groups in middle school mathematics. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 369-395. doi:10.3102/00028312031002369 http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00028312031002369
250. Webb, N., & Farivar, S. (1999). Developing productive group interaction in middle school mathematics. In A.O'Donnell & A.King (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning (pp. 117-150). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
251. Webb, N., & Mastergeorge, A. (2003). Promoting effective helping in peer-directed groups. International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 73-97. doi:10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00074-0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355%2803%2900074-0
252. Webb, N., Nemer, K., Chizhik, A., & Sugrue, B. (1998). Equity issues in collaborative group assessment: Group composition and performance. American Educational Research Journal, 35, 607-651. doi:10.3102/00028312035004607 http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00028312035004607
253. Webb, N., Nemer, K., Kersting, N., Ing, M., & Forrest, J. (2004). The effects of teacher discourse on student behavior and learning in peer-directed groups. Report No. 627, Center for the Study of Evaluation, University of California, Los Angeles.
254. Webb, N., & Palincsar, A. (1996). Group processes in the classroom. In D.Berliner & R.Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (3rd ed., pp. 841-873). New York: Macmillan.
255. Webb, N., Troper, J., & Fall, R. (1995). Constructive activity and learning in collaborative small groups. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 406-423. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.87.3.406 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.87.3.406
256. Weinberger, A., Ertl, B., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2005). Epistemic and social scripts in computer-supported collaborative learning. Instructional Science, 33, 1-30. doi:10.1007/s11251-004-2322-4 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11251-004-2322-4
257. Weissenburger, J., & Espin, C. (2005). Curriculum-based measures of writing across grade levels. Journal of School Psychology, 43, 153-169. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2005.03.002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2005.03.002
258. Wertsch, J. (1979). From social interaction to higher psychological processes: A clarification and application of Vygotsky's theory. Human Development, 22, 1-22. doi:10.1159/000272425 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000272425
259. Wertsch, J. (1984). The zone of proximal development: Some conceptual issues. In J.Wertsch & B.Rogoff (Eds.), Children's learning in the zone of proximal development (pp. 7-18). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
260. Wiggins, G. (1998). Educative assessment: Designing assessments to inform and improve student performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
261. Wiliam, D., Lee, C., Harrison, C., & Black, P. (2004). Teachers developing assessment for learning: Impact on student achievement. Assessment in Education, 11, 49-64.
262. Wittrock, M. (1990). Generative processes of comprehension. Educational Psychologist, 24, 345-376. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2404_2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2404_2
263. Woolfolk, A. (1998). Educational psychology (7th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
264. Zimitat, C., & Miflin, C. (2003). Using assessment to induct students and staff into the PBL tutorial process. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 28, 17-32. doi:10.1080/02602930301685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602930301685