New learning and the classification of learning environments in secondary education

Review of Educational Research

Volumn 74, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 141-170

  De Kock, Adrianus ^a   Sleegers, Peter ^a,b   Voeten, Marinus J M ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Classification; Constructivism; Educational objectives; Learning environments; Secondary education; Teacher and learner roles

Indexed keywords

EID: 4544292247     PISSN: 00346543     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/00346543074002141     Document Type: Review

References (65)

1. Abrami, P. C., Chambers, B., Poulsen, C., & Wade, A. (1995). Current resources in cooperative learning. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
2. Anderson, L. M. (1989). Implementing instructional programs to promote meaningful, self-regulated learning. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching (Vol. 1, pp. 265-306). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
3. Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.
4. Barab, S. A., & Duffy, T. M. (2000). From practice fields to communities of practice. In D. H. Jonassen & S. M. Land (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of learning environments (pp. 25-55). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. Barnes, S. (2002). The contemporary relevance of George Herbert Mead's social psychology and pedagogy. Philosophical Studies in Education, 33, 55-63.
6. Barrows, H. S. (1986). A taxonomy of problem-based learning methods. Medical Education, 20(6), 481-486.
7. Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. New York: Davis McKay.
8. Boekaerts, M., & Simons, P. R. J. (1995). Leren en instructie: Psychologie van de leerling en het leerproces [Learning and instruction: Psychology of the learner and the learning process]. Assen, The Netherlands: Van Gorcum.
9. Bolhuis, S. (2003). Towards process-oriented teaching for self-directed lifelong learning: A multidimensional perspective. Learning and Instruction, 13, 327-347.
10. Bolhuis, S., & Voeten, M. J. M. (2001). Toward self-directed learning in secondary schools: What do teachers do? Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 837-855.
11. Carter, R. (1985). A taxonomy of objectives for professional education. Studies in Higher Education, 10(2), 135-149.
12. Clancey, W. J. (1997). Situated cognition: On human knowledge and computer representations. New York: Cambridge University Press.
13. Cobb, P., & Bowers, J. (1999). Cognitive and situated learning perspectives in theory and practice. Educational Researcher, 28(2), 4-15.
14. Cooper, H. (1998). Synthesizing research: A guide for literature reviews (3rd. ed.). London: SAGE.
15. De Block, A. (1973). Algemene didactiek [Models and methods of instruction] (7th ed.). Antwerpen, Belgium: Standaard Wetenschappelijke Uitgeverij.
16. De Block, A. (1975). Taxonomie van leerdoelen [Taxonomy of learning goals]. Antwerpen, Belgium: Standaard Wetenschappelijke Uitgeverij.
17. De Corte, E. (2000). Marrying theory building and the improvement of school practice: A permanent challenge for instructional psychology. Learning and Instruction, 10, 249-266.
18. De Corte, E., Geerligs, C. T., Lagerweij, N. A. J., Peters, J. J., & Vandenberghe, R. (1981). Beknopte didaxologie [Concise handbook for the study of instructional methods] (5th ed.). Groningen, The Netherlands: Wolters Noordhoff.
19. De Jong, F. P. C. M. (1995). Process-oriented instruction: Some considerations. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 10(4), 317-323.
20. Driscoll, M. P. (2000). Psychology of learning for instruction (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
21. Elshout-Mohr, M., Van Hout-Wolters, B., & Broekkamp, H. (1999). Mapping situations in classroom and research: Eight types of instructional-learning episodes. Learning and Instruction, 9, 57-75.
22. Farnham-Diggory, S. (1994). Paradigms of knowledge and instruction. Review of Educational Research, 64(3), 463-477.
23. Gagné, R. M. (1984). Learning outcomes and their effects: Useful categories of human performance. American Psychologist, 39(4), 377-385.
24. Gagń, R. M. (1985). The conditions of learning (4th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. (1st edition published in 1965).
25. Harrow, A. (1972). A taxonomy of the psychomotor domain: A guide for developing behavioral objectives. New York: David McKay.
26. Hertz-Lazarowitz, R. (1992). Understanding interactive behaviors: Looking at six mirrors of the classroom. In R. Hertz-Lazarowitz & N. Miller (Eds.), Interaction in cooperative groups: The theoretical anatomy of group learning (pp. 71-101). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
27. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
28. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1999). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
29. Jonassen, D. H., & Grabowski, B. L. (1993). Handbook of individual differences, learning, and instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
30. Jonassen, D. H., & Land, S. M. (Eds.). (2000). Theoretical foundations of learning environments. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
31. Joyce, B. R., & Weil, M. (1996). Models of teaching (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
32. Kagan, M., & Kagan, S. (1992). Advanced cooperative learning: Playing with elements. Los Angeles: Sinclair Printing.
33. Kanselaar, G., De Jong, T., Andriessen, J., & Goodyear, P. (2000). New technologies. In R. J. Simons, J. Van der Linden, & T. Duffy (Eds.), New learning (pp. 55-81). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
34. Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Masia, B. B. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook II: Affective domain. New York: David McKay.
35. Land, S. M., & Hannafin, M. J. (2000). Student-centered learning environments. In D. H. Jonassen & S. M. Land (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of learning environments (pp. 1-23). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
36. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
37. Lebow, D. (1993). Constructivist values for instructional systems design: Five principles toward a new mindset. Educational Technology Research & Development, 41, 4-16
38. Lowyck, J. (1995). Didactische werkvormen en media [Didactical methods and media]. In J. Lowyck & N. Verloop (Eds.), Onderwijskunde: Een kennisbasis voor professionals (pp. 215-248). Groningen, The Netherlands: Wolters-Noordhoff.
39. Lowyck, J., & Ellen, J. (1993). Transitions in the theoretical foundation of instructional design. In T. M. Duffy, J. Lowyck, & D. H. Jonassen (Eds.), Designing environments for constructive learning (pp. 213-230). New York: Springer-Verlag.
40. Marzano, R. J. (2001). Designing a new taxonomy of educational objectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
41. Mead, G. H. (1908). Industrial education, the working-man, and the school. Elementary School Teacher, 9, 369-383.
42. Menges, R. J., & McGaghie, W. C. (1974). Learning in group settings: Toward a classification of outcomes. Educational Technology, 14(11), 56-60.
43. Merrill, M. D. (1983). Component display theory. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status (pp. 279-333). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
44. Perkins, D. N. (1992). Smart schools: From training memories to educating minds. New York: Free Press.
45. Reigeluth, C. M. (Ed.). (1983). Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
46. Roelofs, E., Van der Linden, J., & Erkens, G. (1999). Leren in dialoog: Een discussie over samenwerkend leren in onderwijs en opleiding [Learning in dialogue: A discussion about cooperative learning in education and training]. In J. Van der Linden & E. Roelofs (Eds.), Leren in dialoog: Een discussie over samenwerkend leren in onderwijs en opleiding (pp. 7-34). Groningen, The Netherlands: Wolters-Noordhoff.
47. Romiszowski, A. J. (1981). Designing instructional systems: Decision making in course planning and curriculum design. New York: Nichols Publishing.
48. Romiszowski, A. J. (1984). Producing instructional systems: Lesson planning for individualized and group learning activities. New York: Nichols Publishing.
49. Salomon, G., & Globerson, T. (1989). When teams do not function the way they ought to. International Journal of Educational Research, 13(1), 89-99.
50. Shepard, L. A. (2001). The role of classroom assessment in teaching and learning. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 1066-1101). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
51. Shuell, T. J. (1996). Teaching and learning in a classroom context. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 726-764). London: Prentice Hall International.
52. Simons, P. R. J. (2000). Towards a constructivistic theory of self-directed learning. In G. A. Straka (Ed.), Conceptions of self-directed learning: Theoretical and conceptional considerations (pp. 155-169). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
53. Simons, R. J., Van der Linden, J., & Duffy, T. (Eds.). (2000). New learning. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
54. Simpson, E. J. (1966). The classification of educational objectives, psychomotor domain. Illinois Teacher of Home Economics, 70(4), 110-144.
55. Slavin, R. E. (1998). Sand, bricks, and seeds: School change strategies and readiness for reform. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan, & D. Hopkins (Eds.), International handbook of educational change (pp. 1299-1313). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
56. Smith, E. R., & Tyler, R. W. (1942). Appraising and recording student progress. New York: Harper and Row.
57. Taba, H. (1962). Curriculum development: Theory and practice. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
58. Van der Linden, J., Erkens, G., Schmidt, H., & Renshaw, P. (2000). Collaborative learning. In R. J. Simons, J. Van der Linden, & T. Duffy (Eds.), New learning (pp. 37-54). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
59. Van Hout-Wolters, B. (2000). Assessing active self-directed learning. In R. J. Simons, J. Van der Linden, & T. Duffy (Eds.), New learning (pp. 21-36). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
60. Veenman, S., Van Benthum, N., Bootsma, D., Van Dieren, J., & Van der Kemp, N. (2002). Cooperative learning and teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 87-103.
61. Vermunt, J. D. H. M. (1994). Design principles of process-oriented instruction. In F. P. C. M. de long & B. Van Hout-Wolters (Eds.), Process-oriented instruction and learning from text (pp. 15-26). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: VU University Press.
62. Vermunt, J. D. (1995). Process-oriented instruction in learning and thinking strategies. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 10, 325-349.
63. Volet, S. (1995). Process-oriented instruction: A discussion. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 70(4), 449-459.
64. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
65. Windschitl, M. (2002). Framing constructivism in practice as the negotiation of dilemmas: An analysis of the conceptual, pedagogical, cultural, and political challenges facing teachers. Review of Educational Research, 72(2), 131-175.