Balanced, strategic reading instruction for upper-elementary and middle school students with reading disabilities: A comparative study of two approaches

Learning Disability Quarterly

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 59-74

  Manset Williamson, Genevieve ^a,b   Nelson, Jason M ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Wright Education Bldg   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 14544268005     PISSN: 07319487     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/4126973     Document Type: Review

References (60)

1. Adams, G., & Gamine, D. (2003). Direct instruction. In H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 403-416). New York: Guilford.
2. Allington, R. L., & McGill-Franzen, A. (2003). The impact of summer setback on the reading achievement gap. Phi Delta Kappan 84, 68-75.
3. Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., Sandora, C., Kucan, L., & Worthy, J. (1996). Questioning the author: A year long classroom implementation to engage students with text. Elementary School Journal, 96, 385-414.
4. Byars, B. C. (1994). The Golly sisters ride again. New York: Harper Collins.
5. Carr, E., & Ogle, D. (1987). K-W-L plus: A strategy for comprehension and summarization. Journal of Reading, 30, 626-631.
6. Chall, J. S. (2000). The academic achievement challenge: What really works in the classroom? New York: Guilford.
7. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavior change (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Cunningham, P. M., & Allington, R. L. (1999). Classrooms that work: They can all read and write. New York: Longman.
9. Deno, S.L., Fuchs, L. S., Marston, D., & Shin, J. (2001). Using curriculum-based measurement to establish growth standards for students with learning disabilities. School Psychology Review, 30, 507-524.
10. Duffy, G. G. (2002). The case for direct explanation of strategies. In C. C. Block & M. Pressley (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 28-41). New York: Guilford.
11. Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L., Sivan, E., Rackliffe, G., Book, C., Meloth, M., Vavrus, L., Wesselman, R., Putnam, J., & Bassiri, D. (1987). Effects of explaining the reasoning associated with using reading strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 347-368.
12. Dykman, R. A., & Ackerman, P. T. (1991). ADD and specific reading disability: Separate but often overlapping disorders. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 96-103.
13. Fernald, G. M. (1943). Remedial techniques in basic school subjects. New York: McGraw-Hill.
14. Fletcher, J. M., Morris, R. D., & Lyon, G. R. (2003). Classification and definition of learning disabilities: An integrative perspective. In H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 30-56). New York: Guilford.
15. Foorman, B. R., Francis, D. J., Fletcher, J. M., Schatschneider, C., & Mehta, P. (1994). The role of instruction in learning to read: Preventing reading failure in at-risk children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 37-55.
16. Fountas, I., & Pinnell, G. (1996). Guided reading: Good first teaching for all children. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
17. Francis, D. J., Shaywitz, S. E., Stuebing, K. K., Shaywitz, B. A., & Fletcher, J. M. (1996). Developmental lag versus deficit models of reading disability: A longitudinal, individual growth curves analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 3-17.
18. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M. K., & Jenkins, J. R. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 239-256.
19. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Maxwell, L. (1988). The validity of informal measures of reading comprehension. Remedial and Special Education, 9, 20-28.
20. Hunter, J. E., Schmidt, E. L., & Jackson, G. B. (1982). Metaanalysis: Cumulating research findings across studies. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
21. Gersten, R., Fuchs, L. S., Williams, J. P., & Baker, S. (2001). Teaching reading comprehension strategies to students with learning disabilities: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research 71, 279-320.
22. Gillingham, A., & Stillman, B. (1965). Remedial training for children with specific disability in reading, spelling, and penmanship. Cambridge, MA: Educator's Publishing Service.
23. Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1989). Components analysis of cognitive strategy instruction: Effects on learning disabled students' compositions and self-efficacy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 353-361.
24. Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2003). Students with learning disabilities and the process of writing: A meta-analysis of SRSD studies. In H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 323-344). New York: Guilford.
25. Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (1999). Programmatic intervention research: Illustrations from the evolution of self-regulated strategy development. Learning Disability Quarterly, 22, 251-262.
26. Henry, M. K., & Redding, N. C. (2003). Patterns for success in reading and spelling: A multisensory approach to teaching phonics and word analysis. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
27. Hunter, J. E., Schmidt, F. L., & Jackson, G. B. (1982). Meta-analysis: Cumulating research findings across studies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
28. Kamphaus, R. W., & Reynolds, C. R. (2002). Reynolds intellectual screening test. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
29. Lovett, M. W., Lacerenza, L., Borden, S. L., Frijters, J. C., Steinbach, K. A., & De Palma, M. (2000). Components of effective remediation for developmental reading disabilities: Combining phonological and strategy-based instruction to improve outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 263-283.
30. Lovett, M. W., & Steinbach, K. A. (1997). The effectiveness of remedial programs for reading disabled children of different ages: Is there decreased benefit for older children? Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 20, 189-210.
31. Lyon, G. R., Fletcher, J. M., Shaywitz, S., Shaywitz, B., Torgeson, J. K., Wood, F. et al. (2001). Rethinking learning disabilities. In C. Finn, A. Rotherham & C. Hokanson (Eds.), Rethinking special education for a new century (pp. 259-287). Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation.
32. Lyon, G.R., & Moats, L.C. (1997). Critical conceptual and methodological considerations in reading intervention research. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 6, 578-588.
33. Manset, G., & Semmel, M. I. (1997). Are inclusive programs for students with mild disabilities effective?: A comparative review of model programs. The Journal of Special Education, 31, 155-180.
34. Marston, D. (1996). A comparison of inclusion only, pull-out only, and combined service models for students with mild disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 30, 121-132.
35. Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (1997). Best practices in promoting reading comprehension in students with learning disabilities: 1976 to 1996. Remedial and Special Education, 18, 197-213.
36. McGrew, K. S., & Woodcock, R. W. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III technical manual. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.
37. Moody, S. W., Vaughn, S., Hughes, M. T., & Fischer, M. (2000). Reading instruction in the resource room: Set up for failure. Exceptional Children, 66, 305-316.
38. Napier, L. (1985). Nat, the school cat. Milwaukee, WI: Gareth Stevens Publishing.
39. Palinscar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175.
40. Rasinski, T. V. (1990). Effects of repeated reading and listening while reading on reading fluency. Journal of Educational Research, 83, 147-150.
41. Reynolds, R. E. (2000). Attentional resource emancipation: Toward understanding the interaction of word identification and comprehension processes in reading. Scientific Studies in Reading, 4, 169-195.
42. Sawyer, R. J., Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1992). Direct teaching, strategy instruction, and strategy instruction with explicit self-regulation: Effects on the composition skills and self-efficacy of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 340-352.
43. Schacter, J. (2003). Preventing summer reading deficits in children who are disadvantaged. Journal of Early Intervention, 26, 47-58.
44. Schunk, D. H., & Rice, J. M. (1991). Learning goals and progress feedback during reading comprehension instruction. Journal of Reading Behavior, 23, 351-364.
45. Schunk, D. H., & Rice, J. M. (1992). Influence of reading comprehension strategy information on children's achievement out-comes. Learning Disability Quarterly, 15, 51-64.
46. Shaywitz, S. (2003). Overcoming dyslexia: A new and complete science-based program for reading problems at any level. New York: Knopf
47. Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council.
48. Spache, G. D. (1953). A new readability formula for primary grade reading materials. Elementary School Journal, 53, 410-413.
49. Thorpe, H. W., & Borden, K.S. (1985). The effect of multisensory instruction upon the on-task behaviors and word reading accuracy of learning disabled children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 18, 279-286.
50. Torgesen, J. K. (1977). The role of nonspecific factors in the task performance of learning disabled children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 10, 33-40.
51. Torgesen, A. W., Alexander, R. K., Wagner, C. A., Rashotte, K., Conway, T., & Rose, E. (2001). Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities: Immediate and longterm outcomes from two instructional approaches. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 33-58.
52. Torgesen, J. K., & Wagner, R. K. (1998). Alternative diagnostic approaches for specific developmental reading disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 13, 220-232.
53. U.S. Department of Education. (2002). Twenty-fourth annual report on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Act. Retrieved October 22, 2004, from http://www.ed.gov/about/reports/annual/osep/2002/execsumm.html
54. Vaughn, S., & Klingner, J. K. (1999). Teaching reading comprehension through collaborative strategic reading. Intervention in School and Clinic, 34, 284-293.
55. Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, K. (1999). Comprehensive test of phonological processing. Austin: TX: Pro-Ed.
56. Weinstein, G., & Cooke, N. L. (1992). The effects of two repeated reading interventions on generalization of fluency. Learning Disability Quarterly, 15, 21-28.
57. Williams, J. P. (2000). Stiategic processing of text: Improving reading comprehension of students with learning disabilities. Washington, DC: Special Education Programs. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED449596)
58. Wong, B.Y.L. (1996). The ABCs of learning disabilities. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
59. Wong, B.Y.L., Harris, K. R., Graham, S., & Butler, D. L. (2003). Cognitive strategy instruction research in learning disabilities. In H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 383-402). New York: Guilford.
60. Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III tests of achievement. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.