Interaction Quality During Partner Reading

Journal of Literacy Research

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 111-140

  Meisinger, Elizabeth B ^a   Schwanenflugel, Paula J ^a   Bradley, Barbara A ^a   Stahl, Steven A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84990374158     PISSN: 1086296X     EISSN: 15548430     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15548430jlr3602_1     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Boyle M. H. Cunningham C. E. Heale J. Hundert J. McDonald J. Offord D. R. Racine Y. (1999). A tri-ministry study: Evaluation methodology. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 40, 1051–1060.
2. Chard D. Vaughn S. Tyler B. (2002). A synthesis of research on reading fluency for building reading fluency with elementary students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 386–406.
3. DeAngelo N. Reents K Zomboracz C. (1997). Improving reading achievement through the use of parental involvement and paired reading. M.A. Project, Saint Xavier University, Chicago, Illinois.
4. Dunn J. Cutting A. L. Fisher N. (2002). Old friends, new friends: Predictors of children's perspective on their friends at school. Child Development, 73, 621–635.
5. Fuchs D. Fuchs L. S. Mathes R. G. Simmons D. C. (1997). Peer-Assisted Learning Strategies: Making classrooms more responsive to diversity. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 174–206.
6. Greenwood C. R. Delquadri J. C. Hall R. V. (1989). Longitudinal effects of classwide peer tutoring. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 371–383.
7. Griffin M. L. (2002). Why don't you use your finger? Paired reading in first grade. The Reading Teacher, 55, 766–774.
8. Hall R. H. Dansereau D. F. O'Donnell A. M. Skaggs L. P. (1989). The effects of textual errors on dyadic and individual learning. Journal of Reading Behavior, 21, 127–140.
9. Hall R. H. Rocklin T. R. Dansereau D. F. Skaggs L. P. O'Donnell A. M. Lambiotte J. G. Young M. D. (1988). The role of individual differences in the cooperative learning of technical material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 172–178.
10. Holubec E. J. Johnson D. W. Johnson R. T. (1995). Cooperative learning in reading and language arts. In Hedley C. (Ed.), Thinking and literacy: The mind at work (pp. # 229–240), Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Johnson D. W. Johnson R. T. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory into Practice. Edina, MN: Interaction.
12. Johnson D. W. Johnson R. T. (1991). Learning together and alone (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Allyn & Bacon.
13. Johnson D. W. Johnson R. T. (1999). Making cooperative learning work. Theory Into Practice, 38, 67–74.
14. Johnson D. W. Johnson R. T. (1992). Positive interdependence: Key to effective cooperation. In Hertz-Lazarowitz R. Miller N. (Eds.), Interaction in cooperative groups (pp. 174–199). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15. Kleck R. E. DeJong W. (1981). Adult's estimates of the sociometric status of handicapped and nonhandicapped children. Psychological Reports, 49, 951–954.
16. Koskinen P. S. Blum I. H. (1986). Paired repeated reading: A classroom strategy for developing fluent reading. The Reading Teacher, 40, 70–75.
17. Kuhn M. R. Stahl S. A. (2000). Fluency: A review of developmental and remedial practices. Center for the Improvement of Early Reading Achievement, Report # 2–008.
18. La Greca A. M. (1981). Peer acceptance: The correspondence between children's sociometric scores and teacher's ratings of peer interactions. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 9, 167–178.
19. Lancelotte G. X. Vaughn S. (1989). Relation between types of aggression and sociometric status: Peer and teacher perceptions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 86–90.
20. Landau S. Millich R. Whitten P. (1984). A comparison of teacher and peer assessment of social status. Journal of Child Psychology, 13, 44–49.
21. Madden N. A. Stevens R. J. Slavin R. E. (1986). Reading in the mainstream: A cooperative learning approach (Tech. Rep. No 5). Baltimore; Center for Research on Elementary and Middle Schools, Johns Hopkins University.
22. Martinez M. Roser N. (1985). Read it again: The value of repeated readings during storytime. The Reading Teacher, 38, 782–786.
23. Messick S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons' responses as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50, 741–749.
24. Morgan R. T. (1976). ‘Paired Reading’: A preliminary report on a technique for parental tuition for cases of reading deficit. Child Care Health and Development, 2, 13–28.
25. Muldowney C. J. (1995). The effect of a paired reading program on reading achievement in a first grade classroom. M.A. Project, Kean College of New Jersey.
26. Murad C. R. Topping K. J. (2000). Parents as reading tutors for first graders in Brazil. School Psychology International, 21, 152–171.
27. National Reading Panel (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Washington, DC: National Institute for child Health and Human Development.
28. O'Donnell A. M. (1999). Structuring dyadic interaction through scripted cooperation. In O'Donnell A. King A. (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning (pp.# 179–196). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. O'Donnell A. M. Dansereau D. F. (1992). Scripted cooperation in student dyads: A method for analyzing and enhancing academic learning and performance. In Hertz-Lazarowitz R. Miller N. (Eds.), Interaction in cooperative groups (pp.# 120–141). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
30. Pellegrini A. D. Galda L. Bartini M. Charak D. (1998). Oral language and literacy learning in context: The role of social relationships. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 44, 38–54.
31. Pomplun M. (1996). Cooperative groups: Alternative assessment for students with disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 30, 1–17.
32. Rasinski T. V. (1991). Fluency for everyone: Incorporating fluency instruction in the classroom. The Reading Teacher, 43, 690–692.
33. Simmons D. C. Fuchs D. Fuchs L. S. Hodge J. P. Mathes P. G. (1994). Importance of instructional complexity and role reciprocity to classwide peer tutoring. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 9, 203–212.
34. Slavin R. E. Madden N. A. (2000). Research on achievement outcomes of Success for All: A summary and response to critics, Phi Delta Kappan, 82, 38–40, 59–66.
35. Stahl S. A. Holubec K. Crammond B. (1997). Fluency oriented reading instruction. National Reading Research Center, Reading Report No. 79, University of Georgia, Athens, GA.
36. Stevens R.J. Madden N.A. Slavin R.E. Farnish A.M. (1987). Cooperative integrated reading and composition: Two field experiments. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 433–454.
37. Stevens R.J. Slavin R.E. (1995). The cooperative elementary school: Effects on student achievement, attitudes, and social relations. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 321–351.
38. Taylor B. M. Frye B. J. Maruyama G. M. (1990). Time spent reading and reading growth. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 351–362.
39. Topping K. J. (1987a). Paired reading: A powerful technique. The Reading Teacher, 40, 608–614.
40. Topping K. J. (1987b). Peer tutored paired reading: Outcome data from ten projects. Educational Psychology, 7, 133–145.
41. Topping K. J. (1989). Peer tutoring and paired reading: Combining two powerful techniques. The Reading Teacher, 42, 488–494.
42. Topping K. J. Whitley M. (1990). Participant evaluation of parent-tutored and peer-tutored projects in reading. Educational Research, 32, 14–32.
43. Topping K. J. Lindsay G.A. (1992a). The structure and development of the paired reading technique. Journal of Research in Reading, 15, 120–136.
44. Topping K. J. Lindsay G.A. (1992b). Paired reading: A review of the literature. Research Papers in Education, 5, 199–246.
45. Torgeson J. K. Wagner R. Rashotte C. (1997). Test of Word Reading Efficiency. Austin, TX: Pro-ed.
46. Vaughn S. Chard D. J. Bryant D. P. Coleman M. Tyler B. Linan-Thompson S. Kouzekani K. (2000). Fluency and comprehension interventions for third-grade students. Remedial and Special Education, 21, 325–335.