Reciprocal teaching of social studies in inclusive elementary classrooms

Journal of Learning Disabilities

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 91-106

  Lederer, Jeffrey M ^a  

^a Norton Orthopedic Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; COGNITION; EDUCATION; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INTERVENTION STUDY; LEARNING DISORDER; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; SOCIOLOGY; TEACHING; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNIVERSITY; WRITING;

ADULT; CHILD; COGNITION; EDUCATION, SPECIAL; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FACULTY; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; INTERVENTION STUDIES; LEARNING DISORDERS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REMEDIAL TEACHING; SOCIOLOGY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WRITING;

EID: 0348003928     PISSN: 14690047     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/002221940003300112     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., & Gromoll, E. W. (1989). Learning from social studies texts. Cognition and Instruction, 6, 99-158.
2. Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., Sinatra, G. M., & Loxterman, J. A. (1991). Revising social studies text from a text-processing perspective: Evidence of improved comprehensibility. Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 251-276.
3. Borkowski, J. G. (1992). Metacognitive theory: A framework for teaching literacy, writing, and math skills. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 253-257.
4. Bottomley, D., & Osborn, J. (1993). Implementing reciprocal teaching with fourth and fifth grade students in content area reading (Technical Report No. 586). Champaign: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading.
5. Dole, J. A., Duffy, G. C., Roehler, L. R., & Pearson, P. D. (1991). Moving from the old to the new: Research on reading comprehension instruction. Review of Educational Research, 61, 239-264.
6. Palincsar, A. S. (1986). The role of dialogue in providing scaffolded instruction. Educational Psychologist, 21, 73-98.
7. Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and monitoring strategies. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175.
8. Palincsar, A. S., Brown, A. L., & Martin, S. M. (1987). Peer interaction in reading comprehension instruction. Educational Psychologist, 22, 231-253.
9. Palincsar, A. S., & Klenk, L. (1992). Fostering literacy learning in supportive contexts. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 211-225.
10. Pressley, M., & El-Dinary, P. B. (1997). What we know about translating comprehension-strategies instruction into practice. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 486-488, 512.
11. Rojewski, J. W., & Schell, J. W. (1994). Cognitive apprenticeship for learners with special needs. Remedial and Special Education, 25, 234-243.
12. Rosenshine, B., & Meister, C. (1994). Reciprocal teaching: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 64, 479-530.
13. Short, E. J., & Weissberg-Benchell, J. A. (1989). The triple alliance for learning: Cognition, metacognition, and motivation. In C. B. McCormick, G. E. Miller, & M. Pressley (Eds.), Cognitive strategy research: From basic research to educational applications (pp. 33-63). New York: Springer Verlag.
14. States and regions. (1991). Orlando, FL: Harcourt, Brace, & Jovanovich.
15. United States: History and neighbors. (1991). Orlando, FL: Harcourt, Brace, & Jovanovich.
16. Vaughn, S., & Schumm, J. S. (1995). Responsible inclusion for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 264-270.
17. World: Past and present. (1991). Orlando, FL: Harcourt, Brace, & Jovanovich.