Small group and individual learning with technology: A meta-analysis

Review of Educational Research

Volumn 71, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 449-521

  Yiping, Lou ^a   Abrami, Philip C ^b   D'Apollonia, Sylvia ^b,c  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Civil and Environmental Engineering   (Canada)

^c DAWSON COLLEGE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035457987     PISSN: 00346543     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/00346543071003449     Document Type: Article

References (202)

1. Abrami, P. C., Chambers, B., Poulsen, C., De Simone, C., d'Apollonia, S., & Howden, J. (1995). Classroom connections: Understanding and using cooperative learning. Toronto: Harcourt-Brace.
2. Abrami, P. C., Cohen, P., & d'Apollonia, S. (1988). Implementation problems in meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 58(2), 151-179.
3. Abrami, P. C., d'Apollonia, S., & Cohen, P. A. (1990). Validity of student ratings of instruction: What we know and what we do not. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 219-231.
4. Abrami, P. C., Lou, Y., Chambers, B., Poulsen, C., & Spence, J. (2000). Why should we group students within-class for learning? Educational Research and Evaluation, 6(2), 158-179.
5. *Aguirre, A. (1997). The effects of cooperative, competitive and individual computer-assisted instruction on the achievement of middle school students (Doctoral dissertation, University of Houston, 1997). Dissertation Abstracts International, 58, 08A.
6. Albright, M. J., & Graf, D. L. (1991). Instructional technology and the faculty member. In M. J. Albright & D. L. Graf (Eds.), Teaching in the information age: The role of educational technology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7. Ames, C. (1984). Competitive, cooperative, and individualistic goal structures: A cognitive-motivational analysis. In R. E. Ames & C. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education: Vol. 1. Student motivation (pp. 177-207). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
8. *Amigues, R., & Agostinelli, S. (1992). Collaborative problem solving with a computer: How can an interactive learning environment be designed? European Journal of Psychology of Education, 7(4), 325-337.
9. *Anderson, C.-L. (1997). The impact of conceptual models and cooperative learning on the development of mental models for proportions (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Iowa, 1997). Dissertation Abstracts International, 58, 12A.
10. Azevedo, R., & Bernard, R. M. (1995). A meta-analysis of the effects of feedback in computer-based instruction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 13(2), 111-27.
11. Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C.-L. C. (1985). Effectiveness of computer-based education in secondary schools. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 12, 59-68.
12. *Baron, L. J., & Abrami, P. C. (1992). The effects of group size and exposure time on microcomputer learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 8, 353-365.
13. *Belinski, C. F. (1993). The effects of fidelity of instructional simulations and cooperative learning on achievement levels in computer-based instruction (Doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia, 1993). Dissertation Abstracts International, 54, 2123A.
14. *Bellows, B. P. (1986). Group size, group structure and student interaction in children's computer learning (Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1986). Dissertation Abstracts International, 48, 292A.
15. *Benbunan, R. (1997). Effects of computer-mediated communication systems on learning, performance and satisfaction: A comparison of groups and individuals solving ethical scenarios (Doctoral dissertation, Rutgers State University of New Jersey - Newark, 1997). Dissertation Abstracts International, 58, 04A.
16. *Berge, Z. (1990). Effects of group size, gender, and ability grouping on learning science process skills using microcomputers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 747-759.
17. *Berkowitz, M. S., & Szabo, M. (1977, March). Individual and dyadic problem solving on a computer based task as a function of mental ability. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Cincinnati, Ohio.
18. *Blaye, A., & Chambres, P. (1991). Hypercard as a psychological research tool -Experimental studies. In Armando Oliveira (Ed.), Hypermedia courseware: Structures of communication and intelligent help. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
19. *Blaye, A., Light, P., Jointer, R., & Sheldon, S. (1991). Collaboration as a facilitator of planning and problem solving on a computer-based task. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(4), 471-483.
20. *Bloomer, A. C. (1984). Effects of cooperative learning on the acquisition of basic computing skills: A pragmatic approach to developing cost-effective methods for the naive adult learner (Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, 1984). Dissertation Abstracts International, 45, 892A.
21. Bridwell, L. S., Sirc, G., & Brooke, R. (1985). Revising and composing: Case studies of student writers. In S. Freedman (Ed.), The acquisition of written language: Revision and response (pp. 172-194). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
22. Bump, J. (1990). Radical changes in class discussion using networked computers. Computers and the Humanities, 24, 49-65.
23. *Butler, R. H. (1991). Cooperative learning and computer simulations: Examining effects on the problem solving abilities of sixth grade students (Doctoral dissertation, Peabody College for Teachers of Vanderbilt University, 1991). Dissertation Abstracts International, 52, 887A.
24. *Carrier, C. A., & Sales, G. C. (1987). Pair versus individual work on the acquisition of concepts in a computer based instructional lesson. Journal of Computer Based Instruction, 14(1), 11-17.
25. *Cavalier, J. C., & Klein, J. D. (1998). Effects of cooperative versus individual learning and orienting activities during computer-based instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 46(1), 5-17.
26. *Chang, K. Y. R., & Smith, W. F. (1991). Cooperative learning and CALL/IVD in beginning Spanish: An experiment. Modern Language Journal, 75(2), 205-211.
27. *Chapman, D. M. (1985). Teaching and eva uating clinical reasoning through computer based patient management simulations (medical education, clinical skills, small group study, learning strategies, computer based instruction) (Doctoral dissertation, Brigham Young University, 1985). Dissertation Abstracts International, 46, 784B.
28. *Cheney, P. H. (1977). Teaching computer programming in an environment where collaboration is required. AEDS Journal, 7(1), 1-5.
29. *Chernick, R. S. (1990). Effects of interdependent, coactive, and individualized working conditions on pupils' educational computer program performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(4), 691-95.
30. *Chevrette, P. A. (1987). A comparison of college students' performances with alternate simulation formats under cooperative or individualistic class structures (Doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University, 1987). Dissertation Abstracts International, 49, 1681A.
31. Clark, R. E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53, 445-460.
32. *Cockayne, S. (1990). Effects of small group sizes on learning with interactive videodisc (Doctoral dissertation, Brigham Young University, 1990). Dissertation Abstracts International, 51, 394A.
33. Cohen, E. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 1-35.
34. Coley, R. J., Cradler, J., & Engel, P. K. (2000). Computers and the classroom: The status of technology in U.S. schools. Princeton, NJ: Policy Information Center, Educational Testing Service.
35. *Cox, D. A., & Berger, C. F. (1985). The importance of group size in the use of problem-solving skills on a microcomputer. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 1, 459-468.
36. Crook, C. (1991). Computers in the zone of proximal development: Implications for evaluation. Computers in Education, 18(1), 32-42.
37. Crook, C. (1994). Computers and the collaborative experience of learning. New York: Routledge.
38. *Crooks, S. M., Klein, J. D., Savenye, W., & Leader, L. (1998). Effects of cooperative and individual learning during learner-controlled computer-based instruction. Journal of Experimental Education, 66(3), 223-244.
39. Daiute, C. (1989). Play as thought: Thinking strategies of young writers. Harvard Educational Review, 59, 1-23.
40. *Dalton, D. W., Hannafin, M., & Hooper, S. (1989). Effects of individual and cooperative computer assisted instruction on student performance and attitudes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 37(2), 15-24.
41. Damon, W. (1984). Peer education: The untapped potential. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 5, 331-343.
42. Dansereau, D. F. (1985). Learning strategy research. In J. W. Segal, S. F. Chipman, & R. Glaser (Eds.), Thinking and learning skills: Vol. 1. Relating instruction to research (pp. 209-239). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
43. Davie, L. E., & Inskip, R. (1992). Fantasy and structure in computer mediated courses. Journal of Distance Education, 7(2), 31-50.
44. *Derry, S., Tookey, K., & Roth, B. (1993). The effects of collaborative interaction and computer tool use on the problem solving processes of lower ability students. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED374 776.)
45. *Dossett, D. H., & Hulvershorn, P. (1983). Increasing technical training via computer assisted instruction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68(4), 552-558.
46. *Durnin, R. G. (1985). Computer-based education: A study of student interactions and achievement in small group and individual settings (Doctoral Dissertation, Claremont Graduate School, 1985). Dissertation Abstracts International, 45, 3530A.
47. *Dyer, L. D. (1993). An investigation of the effects of cooperative learning on computer-monitored problem-solving. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota.
48. *Edelbrock, R. C. (1990). Computer anxiety reduction: The effect of cooperative learning (Doctoral dissertation, United States International University, 1990). Dissertation Abstracts International, 51, 825A.
49. Farivar, S., & Webb, N. M. (1994a). Helping and getting help - Essential skills for effective group problem solving. Arithmetic Teacher, 41(9), 521-525.
50. Farivar, S., & Webb, N. M. (1994b). Are your students prepared for group work? Middle School Journal, 25(3), 51-54.
51. Fazal, M. B. (1996). Effectiveness and costs of computer-based instruction in higher education and defense training: A meta-analysis (doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, 1996). Dissertation Abstracts International, 57, 09A.
52. Fletcher-Flinn, C. M., & Gravatt, B. (1995). The efficacy of computer assisted instruction (CAI): A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12(3), 219-242.
53. *Foot, T. (1986). The influence of peer interaction in microcomputer based problem solving. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Southampton.
54. Glass, G. V., McGaw, B., & Smith, M. L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
55. Gleser, L. J., & Olkin, I. (1994). Stochastically dependent effect sizes. In Harris Copper & Larry V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
56. *Golton, R. F. (1975). The effects of student interaction on computer-assisted instruction in mathematics at the sixth grade. (Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, 1975.) Dissertation Abstracts International, 37, 166A.
57. *Goodman, H. J. A. (1968). The effects of team learning and of the counteracting of misinformation upon attitudes towards computer instructed learning (Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles, 1968). Dissertation Abstracts International, 29, 1822A.
58. *Grossman, E. S. (1983). A comparison of instructional methods employing group and individual programming in an introductory microcomputer science course. (Doctoral dissertation, Columbia University Teachers College, 1983). Dissertation Abstracts International, 44, 2663A.
59. *Grubb, R. E. (1964). Effects of paired student interaction in the computer tutoring of statistics. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED319 146.)
60. *Guntermann, E., & Tovar, M. (1987). Collaborative problem solving with LOGO: Effects of group size and group composition. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 3(3), 313-334.
61. *Harrison, D. A. C. (1991). The effects of cooperative grouping and ability on achievement by subjects using a computer-based lesson with instructional options (Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin, 1991). Dissertation Abstracts International, 52, 1193A.
62. Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
63. Hedges, L. V., Shymansky, J. A., & Woodworth, G. (1989). A practical guide to modern methods of meta-analysis. Report No. [SBN-0-87355-081-1. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 309 952.)
64. *Henderson, J. L. (1992). The effects of cooperative learning teams on teaching business computer applications and operations at the college level (computer instruction) (Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1992). Dissertation Abstracts International, 53, 49A.
65. *Hill, B. G. (1990). A comparison of the writing quality of paired and unpaired students composing at the computer (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin, 1990). Dissertation Abstracts International, 51, 1891A.
66. *Hine, M. S., Goldman, S. R., & Cosden, M. A. (1990). Error monitoring by learning handicapped students engaged in collaborative microcomputer based writing. Journal of Special Education, 23(4), 407-422.
67. Hinsz, V. B., Tindale, R. S., & Vollrath, D. A. (1997). The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 43-64.
68. *Hooper, S. (1992). Effects of peer interaction during computer based mathematics instruction. Journal of Educational Research, 85(3), 180-189.
69. *Hooper, S., Temiyakarn, C., & Williams, M. D. (1993). The effects of cooperative learning and learner control on high and average ability students. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 41(2), 5-18.
70. *Huang, C. (1993). The effects of types of feedback on performance and attitude in cooperative and individualized computer-based instruction (Doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia, 1993). Dissertation Abstracts International, 54, 1655A.
71. Hunter, E. J., & Schmidt, F. L. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
72. *Inkpen, K., Booth, K. S., Klawe, M., & Upitis, R. (1995). Playing together beats playing apart, especially for girls. In CSCL 1995 Proceedings.
73. *Ivers, K. S. (1994). The effects of computer-based cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning conditions on adult learners' achievement and near transfer performance (Doctoral dissertation, University of South Florida, 1994). Dissertation Abstracts International, 55, 05A.
74. *Ivers, K. S., & Barron, A. E. (1998). Using paired learning conditions with computer-based instruction to teach preservice teachers about telecommunications. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 6(2-3), 183-91.
75. *Jackson, A. C. (1987). Group and individual performance on microcomputer-based problems. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Computer Based Education, the Hatfield Polytechnic.
76. Jackson, A., Fletcher, B., & Messer, D. J. (1986). A survey of microcomputer use and provision in primary schools. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning, 2, 45-55.
77. Jackson, A., Fletcher, B., & Messer, D. J. (1988). Effects of experience on microcomputer use in primary schools: Results of a second survey. Journal of Computer-assisted Learning, 4, 214-226.
78. *Jackson, A., Fletcher, B., & Messer, D. J. (1992). When talking doesn't help: An investigation of microcomputers-based group problem solving. Learning and Instruction, 2, 185-197.
79. *Jegede, O. J., Okebukola, P. A., & Ajewole, G. (1990, August). Attitude to the use of the computer for learning biological concepts and achievement of students in an environment dominated by indigenous technology. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Atlanta, GA.
80. *Jehng, J.-C. J. (1997). The psycho-social processes and cognitive effects of peer-based collaborative interactions with computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(1), 19-46.
81. Johnson, B. T. (1989). DSTAT, software for the meta-analytic review of research literatures. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
82. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book.
83. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1994). Encouraging thinking through constructive controversy. In N. Davidson and T. Worsham (Eds.), Enhancing thinking through cooperative learning. New York: Teachers College Press.
84. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1994). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
85. Johnson, R. T., Johnson, D. W., & Stanne, M. (1985). Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures or computer assisted instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 668-677.
86. Johnson, R. T., Johnson, D. W., & Stanne, M. (1986). Comparison of computer assisted cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 382-392.
87. *Justen, J. E., Waldrop, P. B., & Adams, T. M. (1990). Effects of paired versus individual user, computer-assisted instruction and type of feedback on student achievement. Educational Technology, 30(7), 51-53.
88. *Kacer, B. A. (1989). The impact of small group instruction upon attitude and achievement of students learning computer applications (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Iowa, 1989). Dissertation Abstracts International, 50, 3465A.
89. *Kacer, B., Weinholtz, D., & Rocklin, T. (1992). Individual versus small group instruction of computer applications: A quantitative and qualitative comparison. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 9(1), 6-12.
90. *Keeler, C. M., & Anson, R. (1995). An assessment of cooperative learning used for basic computer skills instruction in the college classroom. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12, 379-393.
91. *Kelley, D.-S. (1998). Cooperative learning as a teaching methodology to develop computer-aided drafting problem solving skills (Doctoral dissertation, Mississippi State University, 1998). Dissertation Abstracts International, 59, 04A.
92. *Kelly, A. E., & O'Donnell, A. (1994). Hypertext and the study strategies of preservice teachers: Issues in instructional hypertext design. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 10(4), 373-387.
93. * Klein, J. D., & Doran, M. S. (1999). Implementing individual and small group learning structures with a computer simulation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47, 97-110.
94. Kulik, C.-L. C., & Kulik, J. A. (1986). Effectiveness of computer-based education in colleges. AEDS Journal, 19, 81-108.
95. Kulik, C.-L. C., & Kulik, J. A. (1991). Effectiveness of computer-based instruction: An updated analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 7, 75-94.
96. Kulik, J. A., Bangert-Drowns, R. L., & Williams, G. W. (1983). Effects of computer-based teaching on secondary school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(1), 19-26.
97. Kulik, J. A., Kulik, C.-L. C., & Cohen, P. A. (1980). Effectiveness of computer-based college teaching: A meta-analysis of findings. Review of Educational Research, 50, 525-544.
98. *Kwinn, A. T. (1990). Effect of experiential learning style on cooperative computer aided instruction: Learning disk operating system (learning style) (Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, 1990). Dissertation Abstracts International, 52, 1719A.
99. *Leali, S. A. (1992). Cooperative and individualized learning with computer assisted instruction in mathematics for at-risk high school students (Doctoral dissertation, University of Denver, 1992). Dissertation Abstracts International, 53, 3788A.
100. *LeBel, C. (1982). Cooperation between adolescents in computer-assisted algebraic problem solving. Unpublished master's thesis, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
101. *Lee, D. W. (1991). A comparison of the effectiveness between the cooperative and individual learning on students' achievement and attitudes on a computer assisted mathematics problem solving task (cooperative learning) (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Iowa, 1991). Dissertation Abstracts International, 52, 2391A.
102. *Lemos, R. S. (1979). The effectiveness of teams in teaching COBOL programming: An empirical study. The Journal of Experimental Education, 47(3), 196-200.
103. *Lidtke, D. (1979). Paired and individual learning in computer programming: An evaluation of student achievement and cost effectiveness (Doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, 1979). Dissertation Abstracts International, 40, 2752B.
104. *Lieber, J., & Semmel, M. I. (1987). The relationship between group size and performance on a microcomputer problem-solving task for learning handicapped and non-handicapped students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 3, 171-188.
105. *Light, P., Foot, T., Colbourn, C., & McClelland, I. (1987). Collaborative interactions at the microcomputer keyboard. Educational Psychology, 7(1), 13-21.
106. *Light, P., & Glachan, M. (1985). Facilitation of individual problem solving through peer interaction. Educational Psychology, 5, 217-225.
107. *Light, P., Littleton, K., Messer, K., & Joiner, R. (1994). Social and communication process in computer-based problem solving. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 9(1), 93-109.
108. *Lookatch, R. P. (1990). The development of critical thinking skills through the use of instructional technologies. Journal of Interactive Instruction Development, 2(3), 26-30.
109. Lou, Y. (1999). The role of social context when learning with technology: A series of meta-analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
110. Lou, Y., Abrami, P. C., & Muni, S. (1998). The effects of social context when learning with computer technology: A meta-analysis. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association, April 13-17, 1998, San Diego.
111. Lou, Y., Abrami, P. C., & Spence, J. C. (2000). Effects of within-class grouping on student achievement: An exploratory model. The Journal of Educational Research, 94(2), 101-112.
112. Lou, Y., Abrami, C. A., Spence, J. C., Poulsen, C., Chambers, B., & d'Apollonia, S. (1996). Within-class grouping: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66, 423-458.
113. *Love, W. P. (1969). Individual versus paired learning of an abstract algebra presented by computer assisted instruction. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 034 403.)
114. Lundgren-Cayrol, K. (1996). Computer-conferencing: A collaborative learning environment for distance education students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
115. *MacGregor, S. K. (1987). Instructional design for computer-mediated text systems: Effects of motivation, learner control, and collaboration on reading performance. Journal of Experimental Education, 56, 142-147.
116. *Makuch, J. R., Robillard, P. D., & Yoder, E. P. (1992). Effects of individual versus paired/cooperative computer assisted instruction on the effectiveness and efficiency of an in-service training lesson. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 20(3), 199-208.
117. *McDermott, T. K. (1985). Effects of cooperative learning strategies on computer literacy of fifth and sixth grade students (Doctoral dissertation, Brigham Young University, 1985). Dissertation Abstracts International, 46, 2919A.
118. *McInerney, V., McInerney, D. M., & Marsh, H. W. (1997). Effects of metacognitive strategy training within a cooperative group learning context on computer achievement and anxiety: An aptitude-treatment interaction study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(4), 686-695.
119. Means, B. (Ed.). (1994). The technology and education reform: The reality behind the promise. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
120. *Mehta, J. I. (1993). Cooperative learning in computer programming at the college level (Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, Chicago, 1993). Dissertation Abstracts International, 54, 1309A.
121. *Mevarech, Z. R. (1993). Who benefits from cooperative computer assisted instruction? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 9(4), 451-464.
122. *Mevarech, Z. R. (1994). The effectiveness of individualized versus cooperative computer-based integrated learning systems. International Journal of Educational Research, 21, 39-52.
123. *Mevarech, Z. R., & Kramarski, B. (1993). Vygotsky and Papert: Social cognitive interactions with LOGO environments. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63(1), 96-109.
124. *Mevarech, Z. R., Silbeer, O., & Fine, D. (1991). Learning with computers in small groups: Cognitive and affective outcomes. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 7(2), 233-243.
125. *Mevarech, Z. R., Stern, D., & Levita, I. (1987). To cooperate or not to cooperate in CAI: That is the question. Journal of Educational Research, 80(3), 164-167.
126. Microsoft Corporation. (1997). Microsoft EXCEL. Redmond, WA: Microsoft Corp.
127. Molnar, A. R. (1997). Computers in education: A brief history. T.H.E. Journal: Technological Horizons in Education, 24, 63-68.
128. Niemiec, R., Samson, G., Weinstein, T., & Walberg, H. J. (1987). The effects of computer-based instruction in elementary schools: A quantitative synthesis. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 20, 85-103.
129. *Noble, G. (1967). A study of the differences between paired and individual learning from a branching program. Programmed Learning, 4, 108-112.
130. *Noell, J., & Carnine, D. (1989). Group and individual computer-based video instruction. Educational Technology, 29(1), 36-37.
131. *Oh, H. A. (1988). The effects of individualistic, cooperative task, and cooperative incentive structures on college student achievement in computer programming in BASIC (Doctoral dissertation, Illinois State University, 1988). Dissertation Abstracts International, 49, 1688A.
132. *Okey, J. R., & Majer, K. (1976). Individual and small group learning with computer assisted instruction. AV Communication Review, 24(1), 79-86.
133. *Olivas, G. W. (1990). The effects of cooperative learning on acquiring competencies for computer applications (Doctoral dissertation, United States International University, 1990). Dissertation Abstracts International, 51, 826A.
134. *Orr, K. L., & Davidson, G. V. (1993, January). The effects of group computer based instruction and learning style on achievement and attitude. In Proceedings of Selected Research and Development Presentations at the Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology Sponsored by the Research and Theory Division, New Orleans, LA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 362 192.)
135. *Park, I. H. (1993). Cooperative learning and individual learning with computer-assisted instruction in an introductory university level chemistry course (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Texas, Austin, 1993). Dissertation Abstracts International, 54, 2972A.
136. *Pattison, C. D. E. (1995). The attitudinal effects of cooperative versus individual instruction in undergraduate computer education classes (Master's thesis, Acadia University). Dissertation Abstracts International, 34, 962.
137. *Perlmutter, M., Behrend, S., & Muller, A. (1985, August). Social influence on preschool children's computer activity. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles, CA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 264 962.)
138. Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in child. New York: Basic Books.
139. *Porter, P. (1993). Fostering collaborative word processing with writing-disabled adolescents. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
140. *Priebe, R. (1997). The effects of cooperative learning in a second-semester university computer science course. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Chicago, IL. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 406 189.)
141. *Quinn, J., Pena, C., & McCune, L. (1996). The effects of group and task structure in an instructional simulation. In Proceedings of selected research and development presentations at the 1996 National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Indianapolis, IN. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 397 826.)
142. Reeves, T. C. (1998). The impact of media and technology in schools. Georgia: The Bertelsmann Foundation.
143. *Reglin, G. L. (1990). The effects of individualized and cooperative computer assisted instruction on mathematics achievement and mathematics anxiety for prospective teachers. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 22, 404-412.
144. *Reiter, J. J. (1994). The comparative effects of direct instruction of problem-solving followed by computer practice in a cooperative learning environment versus direct instruction of problem-solving followed by individualized computer practice. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Johns Hopkins University.
145. *Repman, J., Weller, H. G., & Lan, W. (1993). The impact of social context on learning in hypermedia based instruction. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 2(3), 283-298.
146. Resnick, L. B., Levine, J. M., & Teasley, S. D. (Eds.). (1991). Perspectives on socially shared cognition. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
147. *Robinson, J. (1998). The impact of cooperative learning with computers on student attitudes toward computers (doctoral dissertation, Wilmington College, Delaware, 1998). Dissertation Abstracts International, 59, 01A.
148. Roblyer, M. D., Castine, W. H., & King, F. J. (1988). Assessing the impact of computer-based instruction. Computers in the School, 5(3-4), 11-147.
149. Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research (Rev. ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
150. *Roussey, J. Y., Farioli, F., & Piolat, A. (1992). Effects of social regulation and computer assistance on the monitoring of writing. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 7(4), 295-309.
151. Ryan, A. W. (1991). Meta-analysis of achievement effects of microcomputer-based instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 39, 70-79.
152. Salomon, G. (1993). Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
153. Samson, G. E., Niemiec, R., Weinstein, T., & Walberg, H. J. (1985). Effects of computer-based instruction on secondary school achievement: A quantitative synthesis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
154. *Sancilio, L. (1992). Two versus one? The effects of pairing friends on cognition during collaborative learning with LOGO (doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin, 1992). Dissertation Abstracts International, 53, 3152A.
155. *Savard, M., Mitchell, S., Abrami, P. C., & Corso, M. (1995). Learning together at a distance. Canadian Journal of Educational Communication, 24, 117-131.
156. *Savitt, C. (1996). The effect of cooperative learning on computer anxiety, attitude and performance when learning internet skills (doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University, 1996). Dissertation Abstracts International, 57, 10A.
157. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1996). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. In T. Koschmann (Ed.), CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
158. Sedlmeier, P., & Gigerenzer, G. (1989). Do studies of statistical power have an effect on the power of studies? Psychological Bulletin, 105, 309-316.
159. *Sengendo, A. B. K. (1987). The effects of computer assisted cooperative learning on the science achievement and attitudes of American Indian students (doctoral dissertation, University of Kansas, 1987). Dissertation Abstracts International, 49, 1435A.
160. *Seymour, S. R. (1994). Operative computer learning with cooperative task and reward structures. Journal of Technology Education, 5(2), 40-51.
161. Sharan, Y., & Sharan, S. (1976). Small-group teaching. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
162. Sharan, Y., & Sharan, S. (1992). Expanding cooperative learning through group investigation. New York: Teachers College Press.
163. *Shen, C.-H. (1997). The effects of gender and cooperative learning with CAI on college students' computer science achievement and attitudes toward computers (doctoral dissertation, Florida Institute of Technology, 1997). Dissertation Abstracts International, 55, 11A.
164. Shepperd, J. (1993). Productivity losses in performance groups: A motivation analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 67-81.
165. *Shlechter, T. M. (1990). The relative instructional efficiency of small group computer based training. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 6(3), 329-341.
166. Shlechter, T. M. (1991, November). What do we really know about small group CBT? Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Association for the Development of Computer-Based Instructional Systems, St. Louis, MO.
167. *Shoffner, M. B. W. (1997). Effects of instructional strategies on emerging technology-based visual literacy instruction: Problem-based learning, networked hypermedia-based instruction, and cooperative learning strategies (doctoral dissertation, Kent State University, 1997). Dissertation Abstracts International, 58 07A.
168. *Simsek, A., & Hooper, S. (1992). The effects of cooperative versus individual videodisc learning on student performance and attitudes. International Journal of Instructional Media, 19(3), 209-218.
169. *Singhanayok, C. (1993). Learner-controlled lessons in cooperative learning groups during computer-based instruction (doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, 1993). Dissertation Abstracts International, 54, 12A.
170. Sivin-Kachala, J., & Bialo, E. R. (1994). Report on the effectiveness of technology in schools, 1990-1994. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 371 726.)
171. Skinner, B. F. (1961). Why we need teaching machines. In Cumulative record. New York: AppletonCentury-Crofts.
172. Slavin, R. E. (1989). Cooperative learning and student achievement. In R. E. Slavin (Ed.), School and classroom organization (pp. 129-156). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
173. Slavin, R. E. (1992). When and why does cooperative learning increase achievement? Theoretical and empirical perspectives. In R. Hertz-Lazaeowitz & N. Miller (Eds.), Interaction in cooperative groups: The theoretical anatomy of group learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
174. *Sol, Y.-H. (1995). Effects of cooperative computer-assisted instruction: Using learning style preferences in a self-instructional class. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Brigham Young University.
175. *Spaulding, R. R. (1984). An evaluation of computer programming courses in a junior high school relating student grouping to the quality of learning (doctoral dissertation, University of Cincinnati, 1984). Dissertation Abstracts International, 45, 1949A.
176. SPSS, Inc. (1998). SPSS 9.0 for Windows. Chicago: SPSS, Inc.
177. *Stephenson, S. D. (1992). The effects of student-instructor interaction and paired/ individual study on achievement in computer-based training (CBT). Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 19(1), 22-26.
178. *Strang, H. R., Hoffman, M., & Abide, M. (1993). Cooperative participation in a computer-based teaching simulation. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 1(1), 63-71.
179. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics. New York: Harper Collins College Publishers.
180. *Tanamai, A. (1989). A comparison of computer assisted cooperative learning with independent learning (Doctoral dissertation, University of Kansas, 1989). Dissertation Abstracts International, 50, 3471A.
181. *Temiyakarn-McDonald, C. S. (1993). Learner-controlled lessons in cooperative learning groups during computer-based instruction (Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, 1993). Dissertation Abstracts International, 54, 4414A.
182. *Trowbridge, D., & Durnin, R. (1984). Individual vs. group usage of computer based learning materials. In Proceedings of National Educational Computing Conference, (pp. 168-173).
183. *Underwood, G., Jindal, N., & Underwood, J. (1994). Gender differences and effects of co-operation in a computer based language task. Educational Research, 36(1), 63-74.
184. *Underwood, G., McCaffrey, M., & Underwood, J. (1990). Gender differences in a cooperative computer-based language task. Educational Research, 32(1), 44-49.
185. *Vadas, J. (1986). Interactive videodisc for management training in a classroom environment. Videodisc Monitor, 4(10), 16-19.
186. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
187. Webb, N. M. (1982a). Group composition, group interaction, and achievement in cooperative small groups. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 475-484.
188. Webb, N. M. (1982b). Peer interaction and learning in cooperative small groups. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 642-655.
189. *Webb, N. M. (1985a). Cognitive requirements of learning computer programming in group and individual settings. Association for Educational Data Systems Journal, 18(3), 183-194.
190. *Webb, N. M. (1985b). The role of gender in computer programming learning processes. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 1(4), 441-457.
191. Webb, N. M. (1989). Peer interaction and learning in small groups. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 21-39.
192. Webb, N. M. (1997). Assessing students in small collaborative groups. Theory into Practice, 36, 205-213.
193. Webb, N. M., & Palincsar, A. S. (1996). Group processes in the classroom. In D. Berliner & R. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (3rd Ed., pp. 841-873). New York: Macmillan.
194. *Weller, H. G., Repman, J., Lan, W., & Rooze, G. (1995). Improving the effectiveness of learning through hypermedia-based instruction: The importance of learner characteristics. Computers in Human Behaviors, 11, 451-465.
195. *Werner, L. (1997). Effects of learning structure and summarization during computer-based instruction (doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University, 1997). Dissertation Abstracts International, 56, 05A.
196. *Werner, L., & Klein, J. D. (1999, February). Effects of learning structure and summarization during computer-based instruction. Proceedings of selected research and development papers presented at the Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Houston, TX.
197. *Whitelock, D., Scanlon, E., Taylor, J., & O'Shea, T. (1995). Computer support for pupils collaborating: A case study on collisons. In CSCL 1995 Proceedings (pp. 380-384).
198. *Whyte, M. M., Knirk, F. G., Casey, R. J., & Willard, M. L. (1991). Individualistic versus paired/cooperative computer assisted instruction: Matching instructional method with cognitive style. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 19(4), 299-312.
199. *Wolf, B. A. (1994). Effects of cooperative learning and learner control in computer-based instruction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University.
200. *Yadrick, R. M., Regian, J. W., Connolly-Gomez, C., & Robertson-Schule, L. (1997). Dyadic vs. individual practice with exploratory and directive mathematics tutors. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(2), 165-186.
201. *Yelland, N. (1993). Young children's learning with Logo: An analysis of strategies and interactions. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 9(4), 465-486.
202. Yin, J. F. (1999). Computer-assisted cooperative learning in integrated classrooms for students with and without disabilities. Information Technology in Childhood Education, 1999, 61-78.