Comprehensive school reform: A longitudinal study of school improvement in one state

Teachers College Record

Volumn 107, Issue 10, 2005, Pages 2205-2226

  Good, Thomas L ^a   Burross, Heidi Legg ^a   McCaslin, Mary M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645296729     PISSN: 01614681     EISSN: 14679620     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9620.2005.00589.x     Document Type: Review

References (35)

1. Amrein, A. L., & Berliner, D. (2002, March 28). High-stakes testing, uncertainty, and student learning. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 10 (18). Retrieved October 4, 2003, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v10n18
2. Averch, H., Carroll, S., Donaldson, T., Kiesling, H., & Pincus, J. (1974). How effective is schooling? A critical review of research. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
3. Bloom, H. (2002, May 21-22). Longitudinal analysis of the accelerated model. Paper presented at the Network of Researchers' Meeting, Washington, DC.
4. Borman, G. D., & D'Agostino, J. V. (1996). Title I and student achievement: A meta-analysis of federal evaluation results. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 18, 309-326.
5. Borman, G., Hewes, G., Rachuba, L., & Brown, S. (2002). Comprehensive school reform and student achievement: A meta-analysis. Unpublished manuscript, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
6. Borman, G. D., Stringfield, S. C., & Slavin, R. E. (Eds.). (2001). Title I: Compensatory education at the crossroads. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Brookover, W., Beadie, G., Flood, P., Schweitzer, J., & Wisenbaker, J. (1979). School social systems and student achievement: Schools can make a difference. New York: Praeger.
8. Cimbricz, S. (2002). State-mandated testing and teachers' beliefs and practices. Education. Policy Analysis Archives, 10(2), Retrieved November 23, 2003, from http://epaa.asu.edu/eppa/v10n2.html
9. Cohen, M. (1983). Instructional, management, and social conditions in effective schools. In A. Odden & L. D. Webb (Eds.), School finance and school improvement: Linkages in the 1980s (pp. 17-50). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
10. Coleman, J., Campbell, E., Hobson, C., McPartland, J., Mood, A., Weinfield, F., et al. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
11. D'Agostino, J. V., Borman, G. D., Hedges, L. V., & Wong, K. K. (1998). Longitudinal achievement and Chapter 1 coordination in high-poverty schools: A multi-level analysis of the Prospects data. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 3, 401-420.
12. D'Agostino, J. V., & Stoker, G. L. (2002). Teachers' perceptions of Title I program improvement and accountability. In K. Wong & M. Wang (Eds.), Efficiency, accountability, and equity issues in Title, I School Wide Program Implementation (pp. 243-257). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
13. Education Trust. (1999). Dispelling the myth: High poverty schools exceeding expectations. Education Trust in Cooperation with the Council of Chief State School Officers and the U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved April 24, 2002, from http://www.edtrust.org/documents/ dispell.pdf
14. Firestone, W., Mayrowetz, D., & Fairman, J. (1998). Performance-based assessment and instructional change: The effects of testing in Maine and Maryland. Educational Evaluation and Polity Analysis, 20, 95-113.
15. Good, T., Biddle, B., & Brophy, J. (1975). Teachers make a difference. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
16. rd ed., pp. 570-604). New York: Macmillan.
17. Grant, S. (2001). An uncertain lever: Exploring the influence of state-level testing on teaching social studies. Teachers College Record, 103, 398-126.
18. Haney, W., & Madaus, G. (1989). Searching for alternatives to standardized tests: Why's, what's, and withers. Phi Delta Kappan, 70, 683-687.
19. Hess, R., Shipman, V., Brophy, J., & Bear, R. (1969). The cognitive environments of urban pre-school children: Follow-up phase. Report to the Children's Bureau, Social Security Administration, HEW, Washington, DC.
20. Jencks, C., Smith, M., Ackland, H., Bane, M., Cohen, D., Gintis, H., et al. (1972). Inequality: A reassessment of the effect of family and schooling in America. New York: Basic Books.
21. Klitgaard, R., & Hall, G. (1974). Are there unusually effective schools? Journal of Human Resources, 74, 90-106.
22. Linn, R. L., & Haug, C. (2002). Stability of school-building accountability scores and gains. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 29-36.
23. McCormack-Larkin, M., & Kritek, W. J. (1983). Educational Leadership, 40, 16-21.
24. Purky, S., & Smith, M. (1983). Effective schools: A review. Elementary School Journal, 83, 427-452.
25. Rosenholtz, S. (1989). Teachers' workplace: The social organization of schools. New York: Longman.
26. Ross, S. M., Alberg, M., & Nunnery, J. (1998). Selection and evaluation of locally developed versus externally developed schoolwide projects. Memphis, TN: University of Memphis.
27. Rothstein, R. (2002, April 10). Lessons: Schools, accountability, and a sheaf of fuzzy math. The New York Times. Retrieved April 10, 2002, from http://www.nytimes.com
28. Rowan, B., Bossert, S., & Dwyer, D. (1983). Research on effective schools: A cautionary note. Educational Researcher, 72(4), 24-31.
29. Rutter, M., Maughan, B., Mortimore, P., Ouston, J., & Smith, A. (1979). Fifteen thousand hours: Secondary schools and their effects on children. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30. Smith, M. (1991). Put to the test: The effects of external testing on teachers. Educational Researcher, 20(5), 8-11.
31. Stake, R., & Rugg, D. (1991). Impact on the classroom. In R. Stake (Ed.), Advances in program evaluation: Volume, 1 effects of mandated assessment on teaching (pp. xix-xxii). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
32. Stringfield, S., Millsap, M. A., Herman, R., Yoder, N., Brigham, N., Nesselrodt, P., et al. (1997). Urban and suburban/rural special strategies for educating disadvantaged children. Final report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
33. Teddlie, C., Kirby, P., & Stringfield, S. (1993). Schools make a difference. New York: Teachers College Press.
34. Weber, G. (1971). Inner-city children can be taught to read: Four successful schools. Washington, DC: Council for Basic Education.
35. Wong, K. K., & Meyer, S. J. (1998). Title I schoolwide programs: A synthesis of findings from recent evaluation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 20, 115-136.