Interactions among Instructional Practices, Curriculum, and Student Achievement: The Case of Standards-Based High School Mathematics

Journal for Research in Mathematics Education

Volumn 32, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 493-517

  McCaffrey, Daniel F ^a   Hamilton, Laura S ^a   Stecher, Brian M ^a   Klein, Stephen P ^a   Bugliari, Delia ^a   Robyn, Abby ^a  

^a RAND CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Curriculum; High school, 9 12; Integrated curriculum; Reform in mathematics education; Teaching practice

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035564541     PISSN: 00218251     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/749803     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy: Project 2061. New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Bell, R. M., & McCaffrey, D. F. (2000). Bias reduction in standard errors for linear regression with multi-stage samples. AT&T Technical Report TD-4S9H9T. Florham Park, NJ: AT&T Labs-Research.
3. Boaler, J. (1998). Open and closed mathematics: Student experiences and understandings. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29, 41-62.
4. Brewer, D. J., & Goldhaber, D. D. (1996). Educational achievement and teacher qualifications: New evidence from microlevel data. In B. S. Cooper & S. Speakman (Eds.), Advances in educational productivity (6th ed., pp. 243-264). Greenwich, CT: Jai Press.
5. Carpenter, T. P., Franke, M. L., Jacobs, V. R., Fennema, E., & Empson, S. B. (1998). A longitudinal study of invention and understanding in children's multidigit addition and subtraction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29, 3-20.
6. Cobb, P., Wood, T., Yackel, E., & Perlwitz, M. (1992). A follow-up assessment of a second-grade problem-centered mathematics project. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 23, 483-504.
7. Cohen, D. K., & Hill, H. C. (1998). State policy and classroom performance: Mathematics reform in California (CPRE Policy Brief). Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
8. CPM Educational Program (2001). Introductory program information. Sacramento, CA: Author.
9. Fantuzzo, J. W., King, J. A.,& Heller, L. R. (1992). Effects of reciprocal peer tutoring on mathematics and school adjustment: A component analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 331-339.
10. Fuson, K. C., Weame, D., Hiebert, J. C., Murray, H. G., Human, P. G., Olivier, A. I., Carpenter, T. P., & Fennema, E. (1997). Children's conceptual structures for multidigit numbers and methods of multidigit addition and subtraction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 738-760.
11. Ginsburg-Block, M. D., & Fantuzzo, J. W. (1998). An evaluation of the relative effectiveness of NCTM standards-based interventions for low-achieving urban elementary students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 560-569.
12. Greenwood, C. R., Carta, J. J., & Hall, R. V. (1988). The use of peer tutoring strategies in classroom management and educational instruction. School Psychology Review, 17, 258-275.
13. Hamilton, L. S., McCaffrey, D. F., Klein, S. P., Stecher, B. M., Robyn, A., & Bugliari, D. (2001). Teaching practices and student achievement: Evaluating classroom-based education reforms (DRU-2603). Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
14. Horizon Research, Inc. (1996). Local systemic change teacher questionnaire. Chapel Hill, NC: Author.
15. Key Curriculum Press. (1998). Introduction and implementation strategies: A guide for teacher-leaders and administrators. Emeryville, CA: Author.
16. Klein, K., Hamilton, L., McCaffrey, D., Stecher, B., Robyn, A., & Burroughs, D. (2000). Teaching practices and student achievement: Report of first-year findings from the "Mosaic" study of Systemic Initiatives in mathematics and science (MR-1233-EDU). Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
17. Laguarda, K. G. (1998). Assessing the SSIs' impacts on student achievement: An imperfect science. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
18. Lubienski, S. T. (2000). Problem solving as a means toward mathematics for all: An exploratory look through a class lens. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31, 454-482.
19. Mayer, D. P. (1998). Do new teaching standards undermine performance on old tests? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 20, 53-73.
20. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
21. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1991). Professional standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
22. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
23. National Research Council (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
24. Neter, J., Kutner, M. H., Nachtsheim, C. J., & Wasserman, W. (1996). Applied linear statistical models. Chicago: Irwin.
25. Rubin, D. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York: J. Wiley & Sons.
26. Schafer, J. L., (1997). Imputation of missing covariates under a general linear mixed model. Technical report available at www.stat.psu.edu/∼jls/.
27. Schafer, J. L., (1998). PAN Software for S-Plus available at www.stat.psu.edu/∼jls/misoftwa.html#splus.
28. Shields, P. M., Corcoran, T. B., & Zucker, A. A. (1994). Evaluation of NSF's Statewide Systemic Initiatives (SSI) program: First-year report. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
29. Stein, M. K., Grover, B. W., & Henningsen, M. (1996). Building student capacity for mathematical thinking and reasoning: An analysis of mathematical tasks used in reform classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 455-488.
30. Stein, M. K., & Lane, S. (1996). Instructional tasks and the development of student capacity to think and reason: An analysis of the relationship between teaching and learning in a reform mathematics project. Educational Research and Evaluation, 2, 50-80.
31. Tyack, D., & Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering toward utopia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32. Verschaffel, L. & De Corte, E. (1997). Teaching realistic mathematical modeling in the elementary school: A teaching experiment with fifth graders. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 577-601.
33. Webb, N. M., & Palincsar, A. S. (1996). Group processes in the classroom. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 841-873). New York: Macmillan.
34. Williams, L. (1998). The Urban Systemic Initiatives (USI) program of the National Science Foundation. Summary update. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.