Explicit self-regulated strategy development versus reciprocal questioning: Effects on expository reading comprehension among struggling readers

Journal of Educational Psychology

Volumn 96, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 283-296

  Mason, Linda H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2942588986     PISSN: 00220663     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.283     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. abcteach [Web site]. (2001-2004). Retrieved February 25, 2004, from http://www.abcteach.com
2. Anderson, R. C., & Pearson, P. D. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension, Cambridge, MA: Bolt, Beranek & Newman.
3. Anderson, V., & Roit, M. (1993). Planning and implementing collaborative strategy instruction for delayed readers in Grades 6-10. Elementary School Journal, 94, 121-137.
4. Baker, S., Gertsen, R., & Scanlon, D. (2002). Procedural facilitators and cognitive strategies: Tools for unraveling the mysteries of comprehension and the writing process, and for providing meaningful access to the general curriculum. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 17, 65-77.
5. Bednarczyk, A. (1991). The effectiveness of story grammar instruction within a self-instructional strategy development framework for students with learning disabilities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland.
6. Borkowski, J. G., Weyhing, R. S., & Carr, M. (1988). Effects of attributional retraining on strategy-based reading comprehension in learning-disabled students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 46-53.
7. Bos, C. S. (1989). The effects of an interactive instructional strategy for enhancing reading comprehension and content area learning for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 384-90.
8. Bos, C. S., & Vaughn, S. (1998). Strategies for teaching students with learning and behavior problems (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
9. Bos, C. S., & Vaughn, S. (2002). Strategies for teaching students with learning and behavior problems (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
10. Brown, A. L. (1978). Knowing when, where, and how to remember: A problem of metacognition. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 77-157). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Brown, A. L., & Day, J. D. (1983). Macro rules for summarizing texts: The development of expertise. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 1-14.
12. Brown, R., Pressley, M., Van Meter, P., & Schuder, T. (1996). A quasi-experimental validation of transactional strategies instruction with low-achieving second grade readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 18-37.
13. Brown, V., Hammill, D., & Wiederholt, J. L. (1995). Test of Reading Comprehension - 3. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
14. Chall, J. S., Bissex, G. L., Conard, S. S., & Harris-Sharples, S. H. (1996). Qualitative assessment of text difficulty: A practical guide for teachers and writers. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
15. Chambliss, M. J., & Calfee, R. C. (1998). Textbooks for learning: Nurturing children's minds. Maiden, MA: Blackwell.
16. Collins, C. (1991). Reading instruction that increases thinking abilities. Journal of Reading, 34, 510-516.
17. CTB/McGraw-Hill. (1996). Terra Nova. Monterey, CA: Author.
18. Dole, J. A., Brown, K. J., & Trathen, W. (1996). The effects of strategy instruction on the comprehension performance of at-risk students. Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 62-88.
19. Dreher, M. J., & Gambrell, L. B. (1985). Teaching children to use a self-questioning strategy for studying expository text. Reading Improvement, 22, 2-7.
20. Duffy, G. G., & Roehler, L. R. (1989). Improving classroom reading instruction: A decision-making approach (2nd ed.). New York: Random House.
21. Durkin, D. (1978-1979). What classroom observations reveal about reading comprehension instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 4, 482-533.
22. Durkin, D. (1993). Teaching them to read (6th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
23. Ellis, E. S., & Graves, A. W. (1990). Teaching rural students with learning disabilities: A paraphrasing strategy to increase comprehension of main ideas. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 10, 2-10.
24. Englert, C. S., & Mariage, T. V. (1991). Making students partners in the comprehension process: Organizing the reading "POSSE." Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 14, 123-138.
25. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Mathes, P. G., & Simmons, D. C. (1997). Peer-assisted learning strategies: Making classrooms more responsive to diversity. American Education Research Journal, 34, 174-206.
26. Glass, G., McGaw, B., & Smith, M. (1981). Meta-analysis and social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
27. Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2003). Students with learning disabilities and the process of writing: A meta-analysis of SRSD studies. In H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 323-344). New York: Guilford Press.
28. Graves, A. W., & Levin, J. R. (1989). Comparison of monitoring and mnemonic text-processing strategies in learning disabled students. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 12, 232-236.
29. Gresham, F. M., MacMillan, D. L., Beebe-Frankenberger, M. E., & Bocian, K. M. (2000). Treatment integrity in learning disabilities intervention research: Do we really know how treatments are implemented? Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 15, 198-205.
30. Gunning, T. G. (2003). Building literacy in the content areas. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
31. Guthrie, J. T., Van Meter, P., Hancock, G., Alao, S., Anderson, E., & McCann, A. (1998). Does concept-oriented reading instruction increase strategy use and conceptual learning from text? Journal of Educational Psychology, 2, 261-278.
32. Hansen, J., & Pearson, P. D. (1983), An instructional study: Improving the inferential comprehension of good and poor fourth-grade readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 821-829.
33. Harris, K. R. (1982). Cognitive-behavior modification: Application with exceptional students. Focus on Exceptional Children, 15, 1-16.
34. Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (1996). Making the writing process work: Strategies for composition and self-regulation. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
35. Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (1999). Programmatic intervention research: Illustrations from the evolution of self-regulated strategy development. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 22, 251-262.
36. Harris, K. R., Graham, S., & Mason, L. H. (2003). Self-regulated strategy development in the classroom: Part of a balanced approach to writing instruction for students with disabilities. Focus on Exceptional Children, 35, 1-17.
37. Huck, S. W. (2000). Reading statistics and research (3rd ed.). New York: Longman.
38. Johnson, L. A., Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1997). The effects of goal setting and self-instruction on learning a reading comprehension strategy: A study of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 80-91.
39. Johnson, P. (2000). In the news! (Vol. 2). Scottsdale, AZ: Remedia Publications.
40. Leslie, L., & Caldwell, J. (2001). Qualitative Reading Inventory-3. New York, Addison Wesley Longman.
41. Lysynchuk, L. M., Pressley, M., Ailly, H., Smith, M., & Cake, H. (1989). A methodological analysis of experimental studies of comprehension instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 458-468.
42. Manzo, A. V. (1969). The request procedure. Journal of Reading, 13, 123-126, 163.
43. Manzo, A. V. (1973). CONPASS English: A demonstration project. Journal of Reading, 16, 539-545.
44. Manzo, A. V., & Legenza, A. (1975). Inquiring training for kindergarten children. Educational Leadership, 32, 479-483.
45. Manzo, A. V., Manzo, U. C., & Estes, T. H. (2001). Content area literacy: Interactive teaching for active learning (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.
46. Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (1997). Best practices in promoting reading comprehension in students with learning disabilities: 1976-1996. Remedial and Special Education, 18, 197-213.
47. Miranda, A., Villaescusa, M. I., & Vidal-Abarca, E. (1997). Is attribution retraining necessary? Use of self-regulation procedures for enhancing the reading comprehension strategies of children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 503-512.
48. Moody, S. W., Vaughn, S., Hughes, M. T., & Fischer, M. (2000). Reading instruction in the resource room: Set up for failure. Exceptional Children, 66, 305-316.
49. Morrow, L. M. (1985). Retelling stories: A strategy for improving young children's comprehension concept of story structure and oral language complexity. Elementary School Journal, 85, 647-661.
50. National Assessment of Educational Progress. (2003). Results from the NAEP 2000 reading assessment. Retrieved February 25, 2004, from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/reading/results
51. National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read-Reports of the subgroups: Comprehension, Part II: Text comprehension instruction. Retrieved February 25, 2004, from http://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/nrp/report.htm
52. Norton, T., & Land, B. L. J. (2004). Literacy strategies: Resources for beginning teachers, 1-6. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
53. Ogle, D. M. (1989). The know, want to know, learn strategy. In K. D. Muth (Ed.), Children's comprehension of text (pp. 205-223). Newark. DE: International Reading Association.
54. Palinscar, A. S., & Brown, A. L (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension fostering and comprehension monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175.
55. Paris, S. C., Cross, D. R., & Lipson, M. Y. (1984). Informed strategies for learning: A program to improve children's reading awareness and comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1239-1252.
56. Pressley, M. (2000). What should comprehension instruction be the instruction of? In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 545-461). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
57. Pressley, M., Brown, R., El-Dinary, P. B., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). The comprehension instruction that students need: Instruction fostering constructively responsive reading. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 10, 215-224.
58. Pressley, M., Wharton-McDonald, R., Mistretta-Hampston, J. M., & Echevarria, M. (1998). The nature of literacy instruction in ten Grade 4/5 classrooms in upstate New York. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2, 159-194.
59. RAND Reading Study Group. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: RAND. Retrieved February 25, 2004, from http://www.rand.org/multi/achievementforall/reading/ readreport.html
60. Reutzel, D. R., & Cooler, R. B. (2000). Teaching children to read: Putting the pieces together (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
61. Saenz, L. M., & Fuchs, L. S. (2002). Examining the reading difficulty of secondary students with learning disabilities: Expository versus narrative text. Remedial and Special Education, 23, 31-41.
62. Short, E. J., & Ryan, E. B. (1984). Metacognitive differences between skilled and less skilled readers: Remediating deficits through story grammar and attributional training. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 225-235.
63. Sinatra, G. M., Brown, K. J., & Reynolds, R. E. (2002). Implications of cognitive resource allocation for comprehension strategies instruction. In C. C. Block & M. Pressley (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 62-76). New York: Guilford Press.
64. Slater, W. H., & Graves, M. F. (1989). Research on expository text: Implications for teachers. In K. D. Muth (Ed.), Children's comprehension of text (pp. 140-166). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
65. Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (1998) Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
66. Swanson, H. L., Hoskyn, M., & Lee, C. (1999). Interventions for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of treatment outcomes. New York: Guilford Press.
67. Taylor, B. M., Pearson, P. D., Clark, K., & Walpole, S. (2000). Effective schools and accomplished teachers: Lessons about primary-grade reading instruction in low-income schools. Elementary School Journal, 101, 121-165.
68. Tierney, R. J., Readence, J. E., & Dishner, E. K. (1995). Reading strategies and practices: A compendium (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
69. Tompkins, G. E. (2004). 50 literacy strategies: Step by step (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
70. Torgesen, J. K. (1977). The role of nonspecific factors in the task performance of learning disabled children: A theoretical assessment. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 10, 33-40.
71. Trabasso, T., Secco, T., & van den Broek, P. (1984). Causal cohesion and story coherence. In H. Mandl, N. L. Stein, & T. Trabasso (Eds.), Learning and comprehension of text (pp. 83-110). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
72. Tracey, D. H., & Morrow, L. M. (2002). Preparing young learners for successful reading comprehension. In C. C. Block & M. Pressley (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 219-233). New York: Guilford Press.
73. Vaughn, S., Chard, D., Bryant, D. P., & Pedrotty, D. (2000). Fluency and comprehension for third-grade students. Remedial and Special Education, 21, 325-335.
74. Vaughn, S., Moody, S. W., & Schumm, J. S. (1998). Broken promises: Reading instruction in resource rooms. Exceptional Children, 64, 211-225.
75. Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (1997). Relations of children's motivation for reading to the amount and breadth of their reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 420-432.
76. Wong, B. Y. L. (1986), Instructional strategies for enhancing learning disabled students' reading comprehension and comprehension test performance. Canadian Journal for Exceptional Children, 2, 128-132.
77. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13-35). New York: Academic Press.