Computational modeling of membrane proteins

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 83, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 1-24

  Koehler Leman, Julia ^a   Ulmschneider, Martin B ^a   Gray, Jeffrey J ^a  

^a Johns Hopkins University   (United States)

Author keywords

Alpha helical membrane proteins; Beta barrel membrane proteins; de novo folding; Homology modeling; Membrane proteins; Molecular dynamics simulations; Protein modeling; Protein structure; Sequence based methods; Structure prediction

Indexed keywords

G PROTEIN COUPLED RECEPTOR; MEMBRANE PROTEIN; POTASSIUM CHANNEL;

ALPHA HELIX; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL MEMBRANE; BETA SHEET; COMPUTER MODEL; GENE MUTATION; HYDROPHOBICITY; KNOWLEDGE; LIPID COMPOSITION; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; PHYSICS; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SIMULATION; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; BIOLOGY; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; HUMAN; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; HUMANS; MEMBRANE PROTEINS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, PROTEIN;

EID: 84928554417     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.24703     Document Type: Article

References (280)

1. Jones DT. Do transmembrane protein superfolds exist? FEBS Lett 1998;423:281-285.
2. Wallin E, von Heijne G. Genome-wide analysis of integral membrane proteins from eubacterial, archaean, and eukaryotic organisms. Prot Sci Publ Prot Soc 1998;7:1029-1038.
3. Yildirim MA, Goh K-I, Cusick ME, Barabási A-L, Vidal M. Drug-target network. Nat Biotechnol 2007;25:1119-1126.
4. Grisshammer R, Tate CG. Overexpression of integral membrane proteins for structural studies. Q Rev Biophys 1995;28:315-422.
5. Popot JL. Amphipols, nanodiscs, and fluorinated surfactants: three nonconventional approaches to studying membrane proteins in aqueous solutions. Annu Rev Biochem 2010;79:737-775.
6. Bolla JR, Su CC, Yu EW. Biomolecular membrane protein crystallization. Philos Mag 2012;92:2648-2661.
7. Rosenbaum DM, Cherezov V, Hanson MA, Rasmussen SG, Thian FS, Kobilka TS, Choi HJ, Yao XJ, Weis WI, Stevens RC, Kobilka BK. GPCR engineering yields high-resolution structural insights into beta2-adrenergic receptor function. Science 2007;318:1266-1273.
8. Van Horn WD, Kim HJ, Ellis CD, Hadziselimovic A, Sulistijo ES, Karra MD, Tian C, Sönnichsen FD, Sanders CR. Solution nuclear magnetic resonance structure of membrane-integral diacylglycerol kinase. Science 2009;324:1726-1729.
9. Cherezov V, Rosenbaum DM, Hanson MA, Rasmussen SG, Thian FS, Kobilka TS, Choi HJ, Kuhn P, Weis WI, Kobilka BK, Stevens RC. High-resolution crystal structure of an engineered human beta2-adrenergic G protein-coupled receptor. Science 2007;318:1258-1265.
10. Li X, Dang S, Yan C, Gong X, Wang J, Shi Y. Structure of a presenilin family intramembrane aspartate protease. Nature 2013;493:56-61.
11. Baradaran R, Berrisford JM, Minhas GS, Sazanov LA. Crystal structure of the entire respiratory complex I. Nature 2013;494:443-448.
12. Kosinska Eriksson U, Fischer G, Friemann R, Enkavi G, Tajkhorshid E, Neutze R. Subangstrom resolution X-ray structure details aquaporin-water interactions. Science 2013;340:1346-1349.
13. Geibel S, Procko E, Hultgren SJ, Baker D, Waksman G. Structural and energetic basis of folded-protein transport by the FimD usher. Nature 2013;496:243-246.
14. Pervushin K, Riek R, Wider G, Wuthrich K. Attenuated T2 relaxation by mutual cancellation of dipole-dipole coupling and chemical shift anisotropy indicates an avenue to NMR structures of very large biological macromolecules in solution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997;94:12366-12371.
15. Sanders CR, Sonnichsen F. Solution NMR of membrane proteins: practice and challenges. Magn Reson Chem 2006;44 Spec No:S24-S40.
16. Otomo T, Teruya K, Uegaki K, Yamazaki T, Kyogoku Y. Improved segmental isotope labeling of proteins and application to a larger protein. J Biomol NMR 1999;14:105-114.
17. Kainosho M, Torizawa T, Iwashita Y, Terauchi T, Mei Ono A, Güntert P. Optimal isotope labelling for NMR protein structure determinations. Nature 2006;440:52-57.
18. Hyberts SG, Arthanari H, Robson SA, Wagner G. Perspectives in magnetic resonance: NMR in the post-FFT era. J Magn Reson 2014;241:60-73.
19. Voehler MW, Collier G, Young JK, Stone MP, Germann MW. Performance of cryogenic probes as a function of ionic strength and sample tube geometry. J Magn Reson 2006;183:102-109.
20. Koehler J, Meiler J. Expanding the utility of NMR restraints with paramagnetic compounds: background and practical aspects. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc 2011;59:360-389.
21. Gautier A, Mott HR, Bostock MJ, Kirkpatrick JP, Nietlispach D. Structure determination of the seven-helix transmembrane receptor sensory rhodopsin II by solution NMR spectroscopy. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2010;17:768-774.
22. Reckel S, Gottstein D, Stehle J, Löhr F, Verhoefen MK, Takeda M, Silvers R, Kainosho M, Glaubitz C, Wachtveitl J, Bernhard F, Schwalbe H, Güntert P, Dötsch V. Solution NMR structure of proteorhodopsin. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2011;50:11942-11946.
23. Patzelt H, Simon B, terLaak A, Kessler B, Kühne R, Schmieder P, Oesterhelt D, Oschkinat H. The structures of the active center in dark-adapted bacteriorhodopsin by solution-state NMR spectroscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002;99:9765-9770.
24. Yu L, Sun C, Song D, Shen J, Xu N, Gunasekera A, Hajduk PJ, Olejniczak ET. Nuclear magnetic resonance structural studies of a potassium channel-charybdotoxin complex. Biochemistry (Mosc) 2005;44:15834-15841.
25. Berardi MJ, Shih WM, Harrison SC, Chou JJ. Mitochondrial uncoupling protein 2 structure determined by NMR molecular fragment searching. Nature 2011;476:109-113.
26. Bayrhuber M, Meins T, Habeck M, Becker S, Giller K, Villinger S, Vonrhein C, Griesinger C, Zweckstetter M, Zeth K. Structure of the human voltage-dependent anion channel. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008;105:15370-15375.
27. Shahid SA, Bardiaux B, Franks WT, Krabben L, Habeck M, van Rossum BJ, Linke D. Membrane-protein structure determination by solid-state NMR spectroscopy of microcrystals. Nat Methods 2012;9:1212-1217.
28. Wang S, Munro RA, Shi L, Kawamura I, Okitsu T, Wada A, Kim SY, Jung KH, Brown LS, Ladizhansky V. Solid-state NMR spectroscopy structure determination of a lipid-embedded heptahelical membrane protein. Nat Methods 2013;10:1007-1012.
29. Liao M, Cao E, Julius D, Cheng Y. Structure of the TRPV1 ion channel determined by electron cryo-microscopy. Nature 2013;504:107-112.
30. Gogala M, Becker T, Beatrix B, Armache JP, Barrio-Garcia C, Berninghausen O, Beckmann R. Structures of the Sec61 complex engaged in nascent peptide translocation or membrane insertion. Nature 2014;506:107-110.
31. Kloppmann E, Punta M, Rost B. Structural genomics plucks high-hanging membrane proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2012;22:326-332.
32. Klammt C, Maslennikov I, Bayrhuber M, Eichmann C, Vajpai N, Chiu EJ, Blain KY, Esquivies L, Kwon JH, Balana B, Pieper U, Sali A, Slesinger PA, Kwiatkowski W, Riek R, Choe S. Facile backbone structure determination of human membrane proteins by NMR spectroscopy. Nat Methods 2012;9:834-839.
33. Pieper U, Schlessinger A, Kloppmann E, Chang GA, Chou JJ, Dumont ME, Fox BG, Fromme P, Hendrickson WA, Malkowski MG, Rees DC, Stokes DL, Stowell MH, Wiener MC, Rost B, Stroud RM, Stevens RC, Sali A. Coordinating the impact of structural genomics on the human alpha-helical transmembrane proteome. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2013;20:135-138.
34. Hedin LE, Illergård K, Elofsson A. An introduction to membrane proteins. J Proteome Res 2011;10:3324-3331.
35. Otzen DE, Andersen KK. Folding of outer membrane proteins. Arch Biochem Biophys 2013;531:34-43.
36. Rost B, Sander C. Third generation prediction of secondary structures. Methods Mol Biol Clifton NJ 2000;143:71-95.
37. Jones DT. Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices. J Mol Biol 1999;292:195-202.
38. Meiler J, Baker D. Coupled prediction of protein secondary and tertiary structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003;100:12105-12110.
39. Leman JK, Mueller R, Karakas M, Woetzel N, Meiler J. Simultaneous prediction of protein secondary structure and transmembrane spans. Proteins 2013;81:1127-1140.
40. Rost B, Liu, J. The PredictProtein server. Nucleic Acids Res 2003;31:3300-3304.
41. Cole C, Barber JD, Barton GJ. The Jpred 3 secondary structure prediction server. Nucleic Acids Res 2008;36:W197-W201.
42. Bull HB, Breese K. Surface tension of amino acid solutions: a hydrophobicity scale of the amino acid residues. Arch Biochem Biophys 1974;161:665-670.
43. Wimley WC, Creamer TP, White SH. Solvation energies of amino acid side chains and backbone in a family of host-guest pentapeptides. Biochemistry (Mosc) 1996;35:5109-5124.
44. Engelman DM, Steitz TA, Goldman A. Identifying nonpolar transbilayer helices in amino acid sequences of membrane proteins. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem 1986;15:321-353.
45. Koehler J, Woetzel N, Staritzbichler R, Sanders CR, Meiler J. A unified hydrophobicity scale for multispan membrane proteins. Proteins 2009;76:13-29.
46. Kyte J, Doolittle RF. A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. J Mol Biol 1982;157:105-132.
47. Eisenberg D, Weiss RM, Terwilliger TC. The helical hydrophobic moment-A measure of the amphiphilicity of a helix. Nature 1982;299:371-374.
48. Guy HR. Amino acid side-chain partition energies and distribution of residues in soluble proteins. Biophys J 1985;47:61-70.
49. Janin J. Surface and inside volumes in globular proteins. Nature 1979;277:491-492.
50. Beuming T, Weinstein H. Development and application of a knowledge-based scale for the analysis and prediction of interior facing surfaces in transmembrane protein domains. Biophys J 2004;86:256a-256a.
51. Hessa T, Meindl-Beinker NM, Bernsel A, Kim H, Sato Y, Lerch-Bader M, Nilsson I, White SH, von Heijne G. Molecular code for transmembrane-helix recognition by the Sec61 translocon. Nature 2007;450:1026-U2.
52. Moon CP, Fleming KG. Side-chain hydrophobicity scale derived from transmembrane protein folding into lipid bilayers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011;108:10174-10177.
53. Peters C, Elofsson A. Why is the biological hydrophobicity scale more accurate than earlier experimental hydrophobicity scales? Proteins 2014;82:2190-2198.
54. Viklund H, Elofsson A. OCTOPUS: improving topology prediction by two-track ANN-based preference scores and an extended topological grammar. Bioinformatics 2008;24:1662-1668.
55. Kahsay RY, Gao G, Liao L. An improved hidden Markov model for transmembrane protein detection and topology prediction and its applications to complete genomes. Bioinform Oxf Engl 2005;21:1853-1858.
56. Krogh A, Larsson B, von Heijne G, Sonnhammer EL. Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes. J Mol Biol 2001;305:567-580.
57. Nugent T, Jones DT. Transmembrane protein topology prediction using support vector machines. BMC Bioinform 2009;10.
58. Von Heijne G. Membrane protein structure prediction. Hydrophobicity analysis and the positive-inside rule. J Mol Biol 1992;225:487-494.
59. Tusnády GE, Kalmár L, Simon I. TOPDB: topology data bank of transmembrane proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 2008;36:D234-239.
60. Tsaousis GN, Tsirigos KD, Andrianou XD, Liakopoulos TD, Bagos PG, Hamodrakas SJ. ExTopoDB: a database of experimentally derived topological models of transmembrane proteins. Bioinformatics 2010;26:2490-2492.
61. Tusnady GE, Kalmar L, Hegyi H, Tompa P, Simon I. TOPDOM: database of domains and motifs with conservative location in transmembrane proteins. Bioinformatics 2008;24:1469-1470.
62. Hayat S, Elofsson A. BOCTOPUS: improved topology prediction of transmembrane beta barrel proteins. Bioinformatics 2012;28:516-522.
63. Savojardo C, Fariselli P, Casadio R. BETAWARE: a machine-learning tool to detect and predict transmembrane beta-barrel proteins in prokaryotes. Bioinform Oxf Engl 2013;29:504-505.
64. Gromiha MM, Ahmad S, Suwa M. TMBETA-NET: discrimination and prediction of membrane spanning beta-strands in outer membrane proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 2005;33:W164-W167.
65. Singh NK, Goodman A, Walter P, Helms V, Hayat S. TMBHMM: a frequency profile based HMM for predicting the topology of transmembrane beta barrel proteins and the exposure status of transmembrane residues. Biochim Biophys Acta 2011;1814:664-670.
66. Bigelow H, Rost B. PROFtmb: a web server for predicting bacterial transmembrane beta barrel proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 2006;34:W186-W188.
67. Zhai Y, Saier MH. A web-based program (WHAT; for the simultaneous prediction of hydropathy, amphipathicity, secondary structure and transmembrane topology for a single protein sequence. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol 2001;3:501-502.
68. Chou KC, Zhang CT, Maggiora GM. Disposition of amphiphilic helices in heteropolar environments. Proteins 1997;28:99-108.
69. Sapay N, Guermeur Y, Deleage G. Prediction of amphipathic in-plane membrane anchors in monotopic proteins using a SVM classifier. BMC Bioinformatics 2006;7:255.
70. Gautier R, Douguet D, Antonny B, Drin G. HELIQUEST: a web server to screen sequences with specific alpha-helical properties. Bioinformatics 2008;24:2101-102.
71. Meruelo AD, Samish I, Bowie JU. TMKink: a method to predict transmembrane helix kinks. Prot Sci Publ Prot Soc 2011;20:1256-1264.
72. Yohannan S, Faham S, Yang D, Whitelegge JP, Bowie JU. The evolution of transmembrane helix kinks and the structural diversity of G protein-coupled receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004;101:959-963.
73. Yuan Z, Zhang F, Davis MJ, Boden M, Teasdale RD. Predicting the solvent accessibility of transmembrane residues from protein sequence. J Proteome Res 2006;5:1063-1070.
74. Park Y, Hayat S, Helms V. Prediction of the burial status of transmembrane residues of helical membrane proteins. BMC Bioinformatics 2007;8:302.
75. Nguyen D, Helms V, Lee PH. PRIMSIPLR: prediction of inner-membrane situated pore-lining residues for alpha-helical transmembrane proteins. Proteins 2014;82:1503-1511.
76. Adamian L, Nanda V, DeGrado WF, Liang J. Empirical lipid propensities of amino acid residues in multispan alpha helical membrane proteins. Proteins 2005;59:496-509.
77. Adamian L, Liang J. Prediction of transmembrane helix orientation in polytopic membrane proteins. BMC Struct Biol 2006;6:13.
78. Petersen B, Petersen TN, Andersen P, Nielsen M, Lundegaard C. A generic method for assignment of reliability scores applied to solvent accessibility predictions. BMC Struct Biol 2009;9:51.
79. Adamczak R, Porollo A, Meller J. Combining prediction of secondary structure and solvent accessibility in proteins. Proteins 2005;59:467-475.
80. Lemmon MA, Flanagan JM, Treutlein HR, Zhang J, Engelman DM. Sequence specificity in the dimerization of transmembrane alpha-helices. Biochemistry (Mosc) 1992;31:12719-12725.
81. Senes A, Gerstein M, Engelman DM. Statistical analysis of amino acid patterns in transmembrane helices: the GxxxG motif occurs frequently and in association with beta-branched residues at neighboring positions. J Mol Biol 2000;296:921-936.
82. Curran AR, Engelman DM. Sequence motifs, polar interactions and conformational changes in helical membrane proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2003;13:412-417.
83. Langosch D, Arkin IT. Interaction and conformational dynamics of membrane-spanning protein helices. Prot Sci 2009;18:1343-1358.
84. Marsico A, Scheubert K, Tuukkanen A, Henschel A, Winter C, Winnenburg R, Schroeder M. MeMotif: a database of linear motifs in alpha-helical transmembrane proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 2010;38:D181-D189.
85. Walters RF, DeGrado WF. Helix-packing motifs in membrane proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006;103:13658-13663.
86. Yang J, Jang R, Zhang Y, Shen H-B. High-accuracy prediction of transmembrane inter-helix contacts and application to GPCR 3D structure modeling. Bioinform Oxf Engl 2013;29:2579-2587.
87. Lee SY, Skolnick J. Benchmarking of TASSER_2.0: an improved protein structure prediction algorithm with more accurate predicted contact restraints. Biophys J 2008;95:1956-1964.
88. Polyansky AA, Chugunov AO, Volynsky PE, Krylov NA, Nolde DE, Efremov RG. PREDDIMER: a web server for prediction of transmembrane helical dimers. Bioinform Oxf Engl 2014;30:889-890.
89. Li E, Wimley WC, Hristova K. Transmembrane helix dimerization: beyond the search for sequence motifs. Biochim Biophys Acta BBA - Biomembr 2012;1818:183-193.
90. Baker D, Sali A. Protein structure prediction and structural genomics. Science 2001;294:93-96.
91. Pirovano W, Feenstra KA, Heringa J. PRALINETM: a strategy for improved multiple alignment of transmembrane proteins. Bioinformatics 2008;24:492-497.
92. Ng PC, Henikoff JG, Henikoff S. PHAT: a transmembrane-specific substitution matrix. Predicted hydrophobic and transmembrane. Bioinformatics 2000;16:760-766.
93. Hill JR, Deane CM. MP-T: improving membrane protein alignment for structure prediction. Bioinform Oxf Engl 2013;29:54-61.
94. Shi J, Blundell TL, Mizuguchi K. FUGUE: sequence-structure homology recognition using environment-specific substitution tables and structure-dependent gap penalties. J Mol Biol 2001;310:243-257.
95. Chetwynd AP, Scott KA, Mokrab Y, Sansom MS. CGDB: a database of membrane protein/lipid interactions by coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations. Mol Membr Biol 2008;25:662-669.
96. Yarov-Yarovoy V, Schonbrun J, Baker D. Multipass membrane protein structure prediction using Rosetta. Proteins-Struct Funct Bioinform 2006;62:1010-1025.
97. Barth P, Schonbrun J, Baker D. Toward high-resolution prediction and design of transmembrane helical protein structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2007;104:15682-15687.
98. Yarov-Yarovoy V, Baker D, Catterall WA. Voltage sensor conformations in the open and closed states in ROSETTA structural models of K(+) channels. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006;103:7292-7297.
99. Subbotina J, Yarov-Yarovoy V, Lees-Miller J, Durdagi S, Guo J, Duff HJ, Noskov SY. Structural refinement of the hERG1 pore and voltage-sensing domains with ROSETTA-membrane and molecular dynamics simulations. Proteins 2010;78:2922-2934.
100. Eswar N, Webb B, Marti-Renom MA, Madhusudhan MS, Eramian D, Shen MY, Pieper U, Sali A. Comparative protein structure modeling using MODELLER. Curr Protoc Prot Sci Chapter 2007;2:Unit 2 9.
101. Tabassum A, Rajeshwari T, Soni N, Raju DS, Yadav M, Nayarisseri A, Jahan P. Structural characterization and mutational assessment of podocin-a novel drug target to nephrotic syndrome-an in silico approach. Interdiscip Sci 2014;6:32-39.
102. Kelm S, Shi J, Deane CM. MEDELLER: homology-based coordinate generation for membrane proteins. Bioinformatics 2010;26:2833-2840.
103. Ebejer J-P, Hill JR, Kelm S, Shi J, Deane CM. Memoir: template-based structure prediction for membrane proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 2013;41:W379-W383.
104. Hildebrand A, Remmert M, Biegert A, Soding J. Fast and accurate automatic structure prediction with HHpred. Proteins 2009;77(Suppl 9):128-132.
105. Guex N, Peitsch MC, Schwede T. Automated comparative protein structure modeling with SWISS-MODEL and Swiss-PdbViewer: a historical perspective. Electrophoresis 2009;30(Suppl 1):S162-S173.
106. Roy A, Kucukural A, Zhang Y. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nat Protoc 2010;5:725-738.
107. Wang H, He Z, Zhang C, Zhang L, Xu D. Transmembrane protein alignment and fold recognition based on predicted topology. PLoS One 2013;8:e69744.
108. Soding J. Protein homology detection by HMM-HMM comparison. Bioinformatics 2005;21:951-960.
109. Fagerberg L, Jonasson K, von Heijne G, Uhlén M, Berglund L. Prediction of the human membrane proteome. Proteomics 2010;10:1141-1149.
110. Liu J, Rost B. Comparing function and structure between entire proteomes. Prot Sci 2001;10:970-979.
111. Lazaridis T. Effective energy function for proteins in lipid membranes. Proteins 2003;52:176-192.
112. Karakaş M, Woetzel N, Staritzbichler R, Alexander N, Weiner BE, Meiler J. BCL::Fold-de novo prediction of complex and large protein topologies by assembly of secondary structure elements. PloS One 2012;7:e49240.
113. Woetzel N, Karakaş M, Staritzbichler R, Müller R, Weiner BE, Meiler J. BCL::Score-knowledge based energy potentials for ranking protein models represented by idealized secondary structure elements. PLoS One 2012;7:e49242.
114. Weiner BE, Woetzel N, Karakaş M, Alexander N, Meiler J. BCL::MP-fold: folding membrane proteins through assembly of transmembrane helices. Struct Lond Engl 1993 2013;21:1107-1117.
115. Hopf TA, Colwell LJ, Sheridan R, Rost B, Sander C, Marks DS. Three-Dimensional Structures of Membrane Proteins from Genomic Sequencing. Cell 2012;149:1607-1621.
116. Nugent T, Jones DT. Accurate de novo structure prediction of large transmembrane protein domains using fragment-assembly and correlated mutation analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2012;109:E1540-E1547.
117. Stevens RC, Cherezov V, Katritch V, Abagyan R, Kuhn P, Rosen H, Wüthrich K. The GPCR Network: a large-scale collaboration to determine human GPCR structure and function. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2012;12:25-34.
118. Shacham S, Topf M, Avisar N, Glaser F, Marantz Y, Bar-Haim S, Noiman S, Naor Z, Becker OM. Modeling the 3D structure of GPCRs from sequence. Med Res Rev 2001;21:472-483.
119. Vaidehi N, Floriano WB, Trabanino R, Hall SE, Freddolino P, Choi EJ, Zamanakos G, Goddard WA 3rd. Prediction of structure and function of G protein-coupled receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002;99:12622-12627.
120. Michino M, Chen J, Stevens RC, Brooks CL, 3rd. FoldGPCR: structure prediction protocol for the transmembrane domain of G protein-coupled receptors from class A. Proteins 2010;78:2189-2201.
121. Zhang Y. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics 2008;9:40.
122. Zhang Y, Devries ME, Skolnick J. Structure modeling of all identified G protein-coupled receptors in the human genome. PLoS Comput Biol 2006;2:e13.
123. Oberai A, Ihm Y, Kim S, Bowie JU. A limited universe of membrane protein families and folds. Prot Sci Publ Prot Soc 2006;15:1723-1734.
124. Nishida M, Cadene M, Chait BT, MacKinnon R. Crystal structure of a Kir3.1-prokaryotic Kir channel chimera. EMBO J 2007;26:4005-4015.
125. Whorton MR, MacKinnon R. Crystal structure of the mammalian GIRK2 K+ channel and gating regulation by G proteins, PIP2, and sodium. Cell 2011;147:199-208.
126. Gutman GA, Chandy KG, Adelman JP, Aiyar J, Bayliss DA, Clapham DE, Covarriubias M, Desir GV, Furuichi K, Ganetzky B, Garcia ML, Grissmer S, Jan LY, Karschin A, Kim D, Kuperschmidt S, Kurachi Y, Lazdunski M, Lesage F, Lester HA, McKinnon D, Nichols CG, O'Kelly I, Robbins J, Robertson GA, Rudy B, Sanguinetti M, Seino S, Stuehmer W, Tamkun MM, Vandenberg CA, Wei A, Wulff H, Wymore RS. International Union of Pharmacology. XLI. Compendium of voltage-gated ion channels: potassium channels. Pharmacol Rev 2003;55:583-586.
127. Doyle DA, Morais Cabral J, Pfuetzner RA, Kuo A, Gulbis JM, Cohen SL, Chait BT, MacKinnon R. The structure of the potassium channel: molecular basis of K+ conduction and selectivity. Science 1998;280:69-77.
128. Jiang Y, Lee A, Chen J, Ruta V, Cadene M, Chait BT, MacKinnon R. X-ray structure of a voltage-dependent K+ channel. Nature 2003;423:33-41.
129. Long SB, Campbell EB, Mackinnon R. Crystal structure of a mammalian voltage-dependent Shaker family K+ channel. Science 2005;309:897-903.
130. Kuo A, et al. Crystal structure of the potassium channel KirBac1.1 in the closed state. Science 2003;300:1922-1926.
131. Jiang, Y. et al. Crystal structure and mechanism of a calcium-gated potassium channel. Nature 2002;417:515-522.
132. Berneche S, Roux B. Molecular dynamics of the KcsA K(+) channel in a bilayer membrane. Biophys J 2000;78:2900-2917.
133. Allen TW, Chung SH. Brownian dynamics study of an open-state KcsA potassium channel. Biochim Biophys Acta 2001;1515:83-91.
134. Berneche S, Roux B. A microscopic view of ion conduction through the K+ channel. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003;100:8644-8648.
135. Fernandez-Ballester G, Fernandez-Carvajal A, Gonzalez-Ros JM, Ferrer-Montiel A. Ionic channels as targets for drug design: a review on computational methods. Pharmaceutics 2011;3:932-953.
136. Saini L, Gupta SP, Kumar Satluri VS. A QSAR study on some series of sodium and potassium channel blockers. Med Chem 2009;5:570-576.
137. Peukert S, Brendel J, Pirard B, Strübing C, Kleemann HW, Böhme T, Hemmerle H. Pharmacophore-based search, synthesis, and biological evaluation of anthranilic amides as novel blockers of the Kv1.5 channel. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2004;14:2823-2827.
138. Du L, Li M, You Q, Xia L. A novel structure-based virtual screening model for the hERG channel blockers. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2007;355:889-894.
139. Butkiewicz M, et al. Benchmarking ligand-based virtual High-Throughput Screening with the PubChem database. Molecules 2013;18:735-756.
140. Sanguinetti MC, Tristani-Firouzi M. hERG potassium channels and cardiac arrhythmia. Nature 2006;440:463-469.
141. Durdagi S, Deshpande S, Duff HJ, Noskov SY. Modeling of open, closed, and open-inactivated states of the hERG1 channel: structural mechanisms of the state-dependent drug binding. J Chem Inf Model 2012;52:2760-2774.
142. Ma J, Hu Y, Guo M, Huang Z, Li W, Wu Y. hERG Potassium Channel Blockage by Scorpion Toxin BmKKx2 Enhances Erythroid Differentiation of Human Leukemia Cells K562. PLoS One 2013;8:e84903.
143. Jimenez-Vargas JM, Restano-Cassulini R, Possani LD. Interacting sites of scorpion toxin ErgTx1 with hERG1 K+ channels. Toxicon 2012;59:633-641.
144. Redaelli E, Cassulini RR, Silva DF, Clement H, Schiavon E, Zamudio FZ, Odell G, Arcangeli A, Clare JJ, Alagón A, de la Vega RC, Possani LD, Wanke E. Target promiscuity and heterogeneous effects of tarantula venom peptides affecting Na+ and K+ ion channels. J Biol Chem 2010;285:4130-4142.
145. Huang PT, Shiau YS, Lou KL. The interaction of spider gating modifier peptides with voltage-gated potassium channels. Toxicon 2007;49:285-292.
146. Wimley WC. The versatile beta-barrel membrane protein. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2003;13:404-411.
147. Clote P, Waldispuhl J, Berger B, Steyaert JM. transFold: a web server for predicting the structure and residue contacts of transmembrane beta-barrels. Nucleic Acids Res 2006;34:W189-W193.
148. Waldispuhl J, O'Donnell CW, Devadas S, Clote P, Berger B. Modeling ensembles of transmembrane beta-barrel proteins. Prot-Struct Funct Bioinform 2008;71:1097-1112.
149. Tran VDT, Chassignet P, Sheikh S, Steyaert JM. A graph-theoretic approach for classification and structure prediction of transmembrane beta-barrel proteins. BMC Genomics 2012;13.
150. Randall A, Cheng J, Sweredoski M, Baldi P. TMBpro: secondary structure, beta-contact and tertiary structure prediction of transmembrane beta-barrel proteins. Bioinformatics 2008;24:513-520.
151. Hayat S, Elofsson A. Ranking models of transmembrane beta-barrel proteins using Z-coordinate predictions. Bioinformatics 2012;28:i90-i96.
152. Naveed H, Xu Y, Jackups R, Liang J. Predicting three-dimensional structures of transmembrane domains of beta-barrel membrane proteins. J Am Chem Soc 2012;134:1775-1781.
153. Defay T, Cohen FE. Evaluation of current techniques for Ab initio protein structure prediction. Prot Struct Funct Bioinform 1995;23:431-445.
154. Skolnick J, Kolinski A, Ortiz AR. MONSSTER: a method for folding globular proteins with a small number of distance restraints. J Mol Biol 1997;265:217-241.
155. Bowers PM, Strauss CE, Baker D. De novo protein structure determination using sparse NMR data. J Biomol NMR 2000;18:311-318.
156. Meiler J, Baker D. Rapid protein fold determination using unassigned NMR data. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100:15404-15409.
157. Latek D, Ekonomiuk D, Kolinski A. Protein structure prediction: combining de novo modeling with sparse experimental data. J Comput Chem 2007;28:1668-1676.
158. Raman S, Lange OF, Rossi P, Tyka M, Wang X, Aramini J, Liu G, Ramelot TA, Eletsky A, Szyperski T, Kennedy MA, Prestegard J, Montelione GT, Baker D. NMR structure determination for larger proteins using backbone-only data. Science 2010;327:1014-1018.
159. Thompson JM, et al. Accurate protein structure modeling using sparse NMR data and homologous structure information. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012;109:9875-9880.
160. Lange OF, Baker D. Resolution-adapted recombination of structural features significantly improves sampling in restraint-guided structure calculation. Proteins 2012;80:884-895.
161. Berjanskii M, Tang P, Liang J, Cruz JA, Zhou J, Zhou Y, Bassett E, MacDonell C, Lu P, Lin G, Wishart DS. GeNMR: a web server for rapid NMR-based protein structure determination. Nucleic Acids Res 2009;37:W670-W677.
162. Barth P, Wallner B, Baker D. Prediction of membrane protein structures with complex topologies using limited constraints. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009;106:1409-1414.
163. Lange OF, Rossi P, Sgourakis NG, Song Y, Lee HW, Aramini JM, Ertekin A, Xiao R, Acton TB, Montelione GT, Baker D. Determination of solution structures of proteins up to 40 kDa using CS-Rosetta with sparse NMR data from deuterated samples. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012;109:10873-10878.
164. Weiner BE, Alexander N, Akin LR, Woetzel N, Karakas M, Meiler J. BCL::Fold-Protein topology determination from limited NMR restraints. Proteins 2014;82:587-595.
165. Chen H, Ji F, Olman V, Mobley CK, Liu Y, Zhou Y, Bushweller JH, Prestegard JH, Xu Y. Optimal mutation sites for PRE data collection and membrane protein structure prediction. Structure 2011;19:484-495.
166. Kazmier K, Alexander NS, Meiler J, McHaourab HS. Algorithm for selection of optimized EPR distance restraints for de novo protein structure determination. J Struct Biol 2011;173:549-557.
167. Hirst SJ, Alexander N, McHaourab HS, Meiler J. RosettaEPR: an integrated tool for protein structure determination from sparse EPR data. J Struct Biol 2011;173:506-514.
168. Alexander N, Bortolus M, Al-Mestarihi A, McHaourab H, Meiler J. De novo high-resolution protein structure determination from sparse spin-labeling EPR data. Structure 2008;16:181-195.
169. Islam SM, Stein RA, Mchaourab HS, Roux B. Structural Refinement from Restrained-Ensemble Simulations Based on EPR/DEER Data: application to T4 Lysozyme. J Phys Chem B 2013;117:4740-4754.
170. Lindert S, Hofmann T, Wötzel N, Karakaş M, Stewart PL, Meiler J. Ab initio protein modeling into CryoEM density maps using EM-Fold. Biopolymers 2012;97:669-677.
171. DiMaio F, Tyka MD, Baker ML, Chiu W, Baker D. Refinement of protein structures into low-resolution density maps using rosetta. J Mol Biol 2009;392:181-190.
172. Förster F, Webb B, Krukenberg KA, Tsuruta H, Agard DA, Sali A. Integration of small-angle X-ray scattering data into structural modeling of proteins and their assemblies. J Mol Biol 2008;382:1089-1106.
173. Pons C, D'Abramo M, Svergun DI, Orozco M, Bernadó P, Fernández-Recio J. Structural characterization of protein-protein complexes by integrating computational docking with small-angle scattering data. J Mol Biol 2010;403:217-230.
174. Politis A, Stengel F, Hall Z, Hernández H, Leitner A, Walzthoeni T, Robinson CV, Aebersold R. A mass spectrometry-based hybrid method for structural modeling of protein complexes. Nat Methods 2014;11:403-406.
175. Kahraman A, Herzog F, Leitner A, Rosenberger G, Aebersold R, Malmström L. Cross-link guided molecular modeling with ROSETTA. PLoS One 2013;8:e73411.
176. Park E, Ménétret JF, Gumbart JC, Ludtke SJ, Li W, Whynot A, Rapoport TA, Akey CW. Structure of the SecY channel during initiation of protein translocation. Nature 2014;506:102-106.
177. Greber BJ, Boehringer D, Leitner A, Bieri P, Voigts-Hoffmann F, Erzberger JP, Leibundgut M, Aebersold R, Ban N. Architecture of the large subunit of the mammalian mitochondrial ribosome. Nature 2014;505:515-519.
178. Brooks BR, Brooks CL 3rd, Mackerell AD Jr, Nilsson L, Petrella RJ, Roux B, Won Y, Archontis G, Bartels C, Boresch S, Caflisch A, Caves L, Cui Q, Dinner AR, Feig M, Fischer S, Gao J, Hodoscek M, Im W, Kuczera K, Lazaridis T, Ma J, Ovchinnikov V, Paci E, Pastor RW, Post CB, Pu JZ, Schaefer M, Tidor B, Venable RM, Woodcock HL, Wu X, Yang W, York DM, Karplus M. CHARMM: the biomolecular simulation program. J Comput Chem 2009;30:1545-1614.
179. Wang J, Wolf RM, Caldwell JW, Kollman PA, Case DA. Development and testing of a general amber force field. J Comput Chem 2004;25:1157-1174.
180. Jorgensen WL, Tirado-Rives J. The OPLS [optimized potentials for liquid simulations] potential functions for proteins, energy minimizations for crystals of cyclic peptides and crambin. J Am Chem Soc 1988;110:1657-1666.
181. Lazaridis T, Karplus M. Effective energy function for proteins in solution. Proteins 1999;35:133-152.
182. Spassov VZ, Yan L, Szalma S. Introducing an Implicit Membrane in Generalized Born/Solvent Accessibility Continuum Solvent Models. J Phys Chem B 2002;106:8726-8738.
183. Im W, Brooks CL, 3rd. Interfacial folding and membrane insertion of designed peptides studied by molecular dynamics simulations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005;102:6771-6776.
184. Ulmschneider JP, Ulmschneider MB. Folding Simulations of the Transmembrane Helix of Virus Protein U in an Implicit Membrane Model. J Chem Theory Comput 2007;3:2335-2346.
185. Monticelli L, Kandasamy SK, Periole X, Larson RG, Tieleman DP, Marrink SJ. The MARTINI coarse-grained force field: extension to proteins. J Chem Theory Comput 2008;4:819-834.
186. Wassenaar TA, Ingolfsson HI, Priess M, Marrink SJ, Schafer LV. Mixing MARTINI: electrostatic coupling in hybrid atomistic-coarse-grained biomolecular simulations. J Phys Chem B 2013;117:3516-3530.
187. Adamian L, Liang J. Helix-helix packing and interfacial pairwise interactions of residues in membrane proteins. J Mol Biol 2001;311:891-907.
188. Fleishman SJ, Ben-Tal, N. A novel scoring function for predicting the conformations of tightly packed pairs of transmembrane alpha-helices. J Mol Biol 2002;321:363-378.
189. Wendel C, Gohlke H. Predicting transmembrane helix pair configurations with knowledge-based distance-dependent pair potentials. Proteins 2008;70:984-999.
190. Park Y, Elsner M, Staritzbichler R, Helms V. Novel scoring function for modeling structures of oligomers of transmembrane alpha-helices. Proteins 2004;57:577-585.
191. Illergard K, Callegari S, Elofsson A. MPRAP: an accessibility predictor for a-helical transmembrane proteins that performs well inside and outside the membrane. BMC Bioinformatics 2010;11:333.
192. Mihajlovic M, Lazaridis T. Calculations of pH-dependent binding of proteins to biological membranes. J Phys Chem B 2006;110:3375-3384.
193. Yuzlenko O, Lazaridis T. Interactions between ionizable amino acid side chains at a lipid bilayer-water interface. J Phys Chem B 2011;115:13674-13684.
194. Forrest LR, Woolf TB. Discrimination of native loop conformations in membrane proteins: decoy library design and evaluation of effective energy scoring functions. Proteins 2003;52:492-509.
195. Gao C, Stern H. A. Scoring function accuracy for membrane protein structure prediction. Proteins 2007;68:67-75.
196. Yuzlenko O, Lazaridis T. Membrane protein native state discrimination by implicit membrane models. J Comput Chem 2013;34:731-738.
197. Ray A, Lindahl E, Wallner B. Model quality assessment for membrane proteins. Bioinform Oxf Engl 2010;26:3067-3074.
198. Heim AJ, Li Z. Developing a high-quality scoring function for membrane protein structures based on specific inter-residue interactions. J Comput Aided Mol Des 2012;26:301-309.
199. Jiang P, Yasar F, Hansmann UH. Sampling of Protein Folding Transitions: multicanonical Versus Replica Exchange Molecular Dynamics. J Chem Theory Comput 2013;9
200. Voelz VA, Jäger M, Yao S, Chen Y, Zhu L, Waldauer SA, Bowman GR, Friedrichs M, Bakajin O, Lapidus LJ, Weiss S, Pande VS. Slow unfolded-state structuring in Acyl-CoA binding protein folding revealed by simulation and experiment. J Am Chem Soc 2012;134:12565-12577.
201. Nymeyer H, Woolf TB, Garcia AE. Folding is not required for bilayer insertion: replica exchange simulations of an alpha-helical peptide with an explicit lipid bilayer. Proteins 2005;59:783-790.
202. Ulmschneider JP, Ulmschneider MB. Sampling efficiency in explicit and implicit membrane environments studied by peptide folding simulations. Proteins 2009;75:586-597.
203. Ulmschneider JP, Ulmschneider MB. United Atom Lipid Parameters for Combination with the Optimized Potentials for Liquid Simulations All-Atom Force Field. J Chem Theory Comput 2009;5:1803-1813.
204. Klauda JB, Venable RM, Freites JA, O'Connor JW, Tobias DJ, Mondragon-Ramirez C, Vorobyov I, MacKerell AD Jr, Pastor RW. Update of the CHARMM all-atom additive force field for lipids: validation on six lipid types. J Phys Chem B 2010;114:7830-7843.
205. Ulmschneider MB, Doux JPF, Killian JA, Smith JC, Ulmschneider JP. Mechanism and Kinetics of Peptide Partitioning into Membranes from All-Atom Simulations of Thermostable Peptides. J Am Chem Soc 2010;132:3452-3460.
206. Ulmschneider JP, Smith JC, White SH, Ulmschneider MB. In silico partitioning and transmembrane insertion of hydrophobic peptides under equilibrium conditions. J Am Chem Soc 2011;133:15487-15495.
207. Stone JE, Hardy DJ, Ufimtsev IS, Schulten K. GPU-accelerated molecular modeling coming of age. J Mol Graph Model 2010;29:116-125.
208. Freddolino PL, Harrison CB, Liu Y, Schulten K. Challenges in protein folding simulations: timescale, representation, and analysis. Nat Phys 2010;6:751-758.
209. Marrink SJ, de Vries AH, Mark AE. Coarse grained model for semiquantitative lipid simulations. J Phys Chem B 2004;108:750-760.
210. Parton DL, Tek A, Baaden M, Sansom MS. Formation of raft-like assemblies within clusters of influenza hemagglutinin observed by MD simulations. PLoS Comput Biol 2013;9:e1003034.
211. Bennett WF, Tieleman DP. Computer simulations of lipid membrane domains. Biochim Biophys Acta 2013;1828:1765-1776.
212. Pannuzzo M, De Jong DH, Raudino A, Marrink SJ. Simulation of polyethylene glycol and calcium-mediated membrane fusion. J Chem Phys 2014;140:124905.
213. Periole X, Knepp AM, Sakmar TP, Marrink SJ, Huber T. Structural determinants of the supramolecular organization of G protein-coupled receptors in bilayers. J Am Chem Soc 2012;134:10959-10965.
214. Lelimousin M, Sansom MSP. Membrane perturbation by carbon nanotube insertion: pathways to internalization. Small Weinh Bergstr Ger 2013;9:3639-3646.
215. Wong-Ekkabut J, Baoukina S, Triampo W, Tang IM, Tieleman DP, Monticelli L. Computer simulation study of fullerene translocation through lipid membranes. Nat Nanotechnol 2008;3:363-368.
216. Andersson M, Ulmschneider JP, Ulmschneider MB, White SH. Conformational states of melittin at a bilayer interface. Biophys J 2013;104:L12-L14.
217. Gumbart J, Chipot C, Schulten K. Free-energy cost for translocon-assisted insertion of membrane proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011;108:3596-3601.
218. Ziervogel BK, Roux B. The binding of antibiotics in OmpF porin. Struct Lond Engl 1993 2013;21:76-87.
219. Lin YL, Meng Y, Jiang W, Roux B. Explaining why Gleevec is a specific and potent inhibitor of Abl kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013;110:1664-1669.
220. Stansfeld PJ, Jefferys EE, Sansom MSP. Multiscale simulations reveal conserved patterns of lipid interactions with aquaporins. Struct Lond Engl 2013;21:810-819.
221. Jensen MØ, Borhani DW, Lindorff-Larsen K, Maragakis P, Jogini V, Eastwood MP, Dror RO, Shaw DE. Principles of conduction and hydrophobic gating in K+ channels. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010;107:5833-5838.
222. Jensen MØ, Jogini V, Borhani DW, Leffler AE, Dror RO, Shaw DE. Mechanism of voltage gating in potassium channels. Science 2012;336:229-233.
223. Ulmschneider MB, Bagnéris C, McCusker EC, Decaen PG, Delling M, Clapham DE, Ulmschneider JP, Wallace BA. Molecular dynamics of ion transport through the open conformation of a bacterial voltage-gated sodium channel. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013;110:6364-6369.
224. Choudhary OP, Paz A, Adelman JL, Colletier JP, Abramson J, Grabe M. Structure-guided simulations illuminate the mechanism of ATP transport through VDAC. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2014;21:626-632.
225. Khalili-Araghi F, Ziervogel B, Gumbart JC, Roux B. Molecular dynamics simulations of membrane proteins under asymmetric ionic concentrations. J Gen Physiol 2013;142:465-475.
226. Dhakshnamoorthy B, Ziervogel BK, Blachowicz L, Roux B. A structural study of ion permeation in OmpF porin from anomalous X-ray diffraction and molecular dynamics simulations. J Am Chem Soc 2013;135:16561-16568.
227. Lindorff-Larsen K, Maragakis P, Piana S, Eastwood MP, Dror RO, Shaw DE. Systematic validation of protein force fields against experimental data. PloS One 2012;7:e32131.
228. Brooks BR, Bruccoleri RE, Olafson BD, States DJ, Swaminathan S, Karplus M. CHARMM: a program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations. J Comput Chem 1983;4:187-217.
229. Lim JB, Rogaski B, Klauda JB. Update of the cholesterol force field parameters in CHARMM. J Phys Chem B 2012;116:203-210.
230. Van Der Spoel D, Lindahl E, Hess B, Groenhof G, Mark AE, Berendsen HJ. GROMACS: fast, flexible, and free. J Comput Chem 2005;26:1701-1718.
231. Phillips JC, Braun R, Wang W, Gumbart J, Tajkhorshid E, Villa E, Chipot C, Skeel RD, Kalé L, Schulten K. Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J Comput Chem 2005;26:1781-1802.
232. Shaw DE. A fast, scalable method for the parallel evaluation of distance-limited pairwise particle interactions. J Comput Chem 2005;26:1318-1328.
233. Sugita Y, Okamoto Y. Replica-exchange molecular dynamics method for protein folding. Chem Phys Lett 1999;314:141-151.
234. Ulmschneider MB, Ulmschneider JP, Schiller N, Wallace BA, von Heijne G, White SH. Spontaneous transmembrane helix insertion thermodynamically mimics translocon-guided insertion. Nat Commun 2014;5:4863.
235. Seyler S, Beckstein O. Sampling large conformational transitions: adenylate kinase as a testing ground. Mol Simul 2014;40:855-877.
236. Stelzl LS, Fowler PW, Sansom MSP, Beckstein O. Flexible Gates Generate Occluded Intermediates in the Transport Cycle of LacY. J Mol Biol 2014;426:735-751.
237. Denning EJ, Woolf TB. Cooperative nature of gating transitions in K+ channels as seen from dynamic importance sampling calculations. Proteins 2010;78:1105-1119.
238. Kohlhoff KJ, Shukla D, Lawrenz M, Bowman GR, Konerding DE, Belov D, Altman RB, Pande VS. Cloud-based simulations on Google Exacycle reveal ligand modulation of GPCR activation pathways. Nat Chem 2014;6:15-21.
239. Shaw DE, Deneroff MM, Dror RO, Kuskin JS, Larson RH, Salmon JK, Young C, Batson B, Bowers KJ, Chao JC, Eastwood MP, Gagliardo J, Grossman JP, Ho CR, Ierardi DJ, Kolossvary I, Klepeis JL, Layman T, McIeavey C, Moraes MA, Mueller R, Priest EC, Shan Y, Spengler J, Theobald M, Towles B, Wang SC. Anton, a special-purpose machine for molecular dynamics Simulation. Commun ACM 2008;51:91-97.
240. Deupi X, Kobilka BK. Energy landscapes as a tool to integrate GPCR structure, dynamics, and function. Physiol Bethesda Md 2010;25:293-303.
241. Kruse AC, Ring AM, Manglik A, Hu J, Hu K, Eitel K, Hübner H, Pardon E, Valant C, Sexton PM, Christopoulos A, Felder CC, Gmeiner P, Steyaert J, Weis WI, Garcia KC, Wess J, Kobilka BK. Activation and allosteric modulation of a muscarinic acetylcholine receptor. Nature 2013;504:101-106.
242. Nygaard R, Zou Y, Dror RO, Mildorf TJ, Arlow DH, Manglik A, Pan AC, Liu CW, Fung JJ, Bokoch MP, Thian FS, Kobilka TS, Shaw DE, Mueller L, Prosser RS, Kobilka BK. The dynamic process of β(2)-adrenergic receptor activation. Cell 2013;152:532-542.
243. Kacprzyk-Stokowiec A, Kulma M, Traczyk G, Kwiatkowska K, Sobota A, Dadlez M. Crucial role of perfringolysin O D1 domain in orchestrating structural transitions leading to membrane-perforating pores: a hydrogen-deuterium exchange study. J Biol Chem 2014;289:28738-28752.
244. Rahman KS, Cui G, Harvey SC, McCarty NA. Modeling the conformational changes underlying channel opening in CFTR. PloS One 2013;8:e74574.
245. Stolzenberg S, Khelashvili G, Weinstein H. Structural intermediates in a model of the substrate translocation path of the bacterial glutamate transporter homologue GltPh. J Phys Chem B 2012;116:5372-5383.
246. Korzhnev DM, Kay LE. Probing invisible, low-populated States of protein molecules by relaxation dispersion NMR spectroscopy: an application to protein folding. ACC Chem Res 2008;41:442-451.
247. Korzhnev DM, Religa TL, Banachewicz W, Fersht AR, Kay LE. A transient and low-populated protein-folding intermediate at atomic resolution. Science 2010;329: 1312-1316.
248. Denning EJ, Crozier PS, Sachs JN, Woolf TB. From the gating charge response to pore domain movement: initial motions of Kv1.2 dynamics under physiological voltage changes. Mol Membr Biol 2009;26:397-421.
249. Lundbaek JA, Koeppe RE, Andersen OS. Amphiphile regulation of ion channel function by changes in the bilayer spring constant. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010;107:15427-15430.
250. Charalambous K, Booth PJ, Woscholski R, Seddon JM, Templer RH, Law RV, Barter LM, Ces O. Engineering de novo membrane-mediated protein-protein communication networks. J Am Chem Soc 2012;134:5746-5749.
251. Kuhlman B, Dantas G, Ireton GC, Varani G, Stoddard BL, Baker D. Design of a novel globular protein fold with atomic-level accuracy. Science 2003;302:1364-1368.
252. Koga N, Tatsumi-Koga R, Liu G, Xiao R, Acton TB, Montelione GT, Baker D. Principles for designing ideal protein structures. Nature 2012;491:222-227.
253. Perez-Aguilar JM, Xi J, Matsunaga F, Cui X, Selling B, Saven JG, Liu R. A computationally designed water-soluble variant of a G-protein-coupled receptor: the human Mu Opioid receptor. PLoS ONE 2013;8:e66009.
254. Yin H, Slusky JS, Berger BW, Walters RS, Vilaire G, Litvinov RI, Lear JD, Caputo GA, Bennett JS, DeGrado WF. Computational design of peptides that target transmembrane helices. Science 2007;315:1817-1822.
255. Sapay N, Estrada-Mondragon A, Moreau C, Vivaudou M, Crouzy S. Rebuilding a macromolecular membrane complex at the atomic scale: case of the Kir6.2 potassium channel coupled to the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2. Proteins 2014;82:1694-1707.
256. Bagriantsev SN, Chatelain FC, Clark KA, Alagem N, Reuveny E, Minor DL Jr. Tethered protein display identifies a novel Kir3.2 (GIRK2) regulator from protein scaffold libraries. ACS Chem Neurosci 2014:5:812-822.
257. Rathinakumar R, Walkenhorst WF, Wimley WC. Broad-spectrum antimicrobial peptides by rational combinatorial design and high-throughput screening: the importance of interfacial activity. J Am Chem Soc 2009;131:7609-7617.
258. Krauson AJ, He J, Wimley W. C. Gain-of-function analogues of the pore-forming peptide melittin selected by orthogonal high-throughput screening. J Am Chem Soc 2012;134:12732-12741.
259. Antia, R, Schlegel RA, Williamson P. Binding of perforin to membranes is sensitive to lipid spacing and not headgroup. Immunol Lett 1992;32:153-157.
260. Lenoir G, Williamson P, Holthuis JC. On the origin of lipid asymmetry: the flip side of ion transport. Curr Opin Chem Biol 2007;11:654-661.
261. Ikeda M, Kihara A, Igarashi Y. Lipid asymmetry of the eukaryotic plasma membrane: functions and related enzymes. Biol Pharm Bull 2006;29:1542-1546.
262. Liguori N, Nerenberg PS, Head-Gordon T. Embedding Aβ42 in heterogeneous membranes depends on cholesterol asymmetries. Biophys J 2013;105:899-910.
263. Slusky JSG, Dunbrack RL, Jr. Charge asymmetry in the proteins of the outer membrane. Bioinform Oxf Engl 2013;29:2122-2128.
264. Denning EJ, Beckstein O. Influence of lipids on protein-mediated transmembrane transport. Chem Phys Lipids 2013;169:57-71.
265. Sanders CR, Mittendorf KF. Tolerance to changes in membrane lipid composition as a selected trait of membrane proteins. Biochemistry (Mosc) 2011;50:7858-7867.
266. Li Q, Wanderling S, Sompornpisut P, Perozo E. Structural basis of lipid-driven conformational transitions in the KvAP voltage-sensing domain. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2014;21:160-166.
267. Adamian L, Naveed H, Liang J. Lipid-binding surfaces of membrane proteins: evidence from evolutionary and structural analysis. Biochim Biophys Acta 2011;1808:1092-1102.
268. Ong YS, Lakatos A, Becker-Baldus J, Pos KM, Glaubitz C. Detecting substrates bound to the secondary multidrug efflux pump EmrE by DNP-enhanced solid-state NMR. J Am Chem Soc 2013;135:15754-15762.
269. Gregory KJ, Nguyen ED, Malosh C, Mendenhall JL, Zic JZ, Bates BS, Noetzel MJ, Squire EF, Turner EM, Rook JM, Emmitte KA, Stauffer SR, Lindsley CW, Meiler J, Conn PJ. Identification of specific ligand-receptor interactions that govern binding and cooperativity of diverse modulators to a common metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 allosteric site. ACS Chem Neurosci, 2014;5:282-295.
270. Moore DT, Berger BW, DeGrado WF. Protein-protein interactions in the membrane: sequence, structural, and biological motifs. Struct 2008;16:991-1001.
271. Babu M, Vlasblom J, Pu S, Guo X, Graham C, Bean BD, Burston HE, Vizeacoumar FJ, Snider J, Phanse S, Fong V, Tam YY, Davey M, Hnatshak O, Bajaj N, Chandran S, Punna T, Christopolous C, Wong V, Yu A, Zhong G, Li J, Stagljar I, Conibear E, Wodak SJ, Emili A, Greenblatt JF. Interaction landscape of membrane-protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 2012;489:585-589.
272. Bordner AJ. Predicting protein-protein binding sites in membrane proteins. BMC Bioinform 2009;10:312.
273. Baaden M, Marrink SJ. Coarse-grain modelling of protein-protein interactions. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2013;23:878-886.
274. Tusnady GE, Dosztanyi Z, Simon I. TMDET: web server for detecting transmembrane regions of proteins by using their 3D coordinates. Bioinformatics 2005;21:1276-1277.
275. Lomize MA, Pogozheva ID, Joo H, Mosberg HI, Lomize AL. OPM database and PPM web server: resources for positioning of proteins in membranes. Nucleic Acids Res 2012;40:D370-D376.
276. Kozma D, Simon I, Tusnády GE. PDBTM: protein data bank of transmembrane proteins after 8 years. Nucleic Acids Res 2013;41:D524-D529.
277. Forrest LR, Tang CL, Honig B. On the accuracy of homology modeling and sequence alignment methods applied to membrane proteins. Biophys J 2006;91:508-517.
278. Sandal M, Duy TP, Cona M, Zung H, Carloni P, Musiani F, Giorgetti A. GOMoDo: a GPCRs online modeling and docking webserver. PloS One 2013;8:e74092.
279. Kelm S, Vangone A, Choi Y, Ebejer JP, Shi J, Deane CM. Fragment-based modeling of membrane protein loops: successes, failures, and prospects for the future. Proteins 2014;82:175-186.
280. Reif MM, Winger M, Oostenbrink C. Testing of the GROMOS force-field parameter set 54A8: structural properties of electrolyte solutions, lipid bilayers, and proteins. J Chem Theory Comput 2013;9:1247-1264.