Sampling efficiency in explicit and implicit membrane environments studied by peptide folding simulations

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 75, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 586-597

  Ulmschneider, Jakob P ^a   Ulmschneider, Martin B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

DPPC bilayer; Generalized born; Implicit membrane; Molecular dynamics; Monte Carlo; Protein folding; Sampling

Indexed keywords

DIPALMITOYLPHOSPHATIDYLCHOLINE; MEMBRANE PROTEIN; PEPTIDE;

AB INITIO CALCULATION; ALPHA HELIX; ARTICLE; LIPID BILAYER; MEMBRANE MODEL; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PARAMETER; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN FUNCTION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RELIABILITY; SAMPLING; SIMULATION; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; TECHNIQUE;

ADSORPTION; CELL MEMBRANE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; KINETICS; LIPID BILAYERS; MEMBRANE PROTEINS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MONTE CARLO METHOD; OCTANES; PEPTIDES; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; STATIC ELECTRICITY; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 66149119835     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.22270     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Terstappen GC, Reggiani A. In silico research in drug discovery. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2001;22:23-26.
2. Grisshammer R, Tate CG. Overexpression of integral membrane-proteins for structural studies. Q Rev Biophys 1995;28:315-422.
3. de Groot BL, Grubmuller H. Water permeation across biological membranes: mechanism and dynamics of aquaporin-1 and GlpF. Science 2001;294:2353-2357. (Pubitemid 33140559)
4. Forrest LR, Sansom MSP. Membrane simulations: bigger and better? Curr Opin Struct Biol 2000;10:174-181.
5. Biggin PC, Sansom MS. Interactions of a-helices with lipid bilayers: a review of simulation studies. Biophys Chem 1999;76:161-183. (Pubitemid 29080764)
6. Domene C, Bond P, Sansom MSP. Membrane protein simulation: ion channels and bacterial outer membrane proteins. Adv Protein Chem 2003;66:159-193. (Pubitemid 37392317)
7. Braun R, Engelman DM, Schulten K. Molecular dynamics simulations of micelle formation around dimeric glycophorin A transmembrane helices. Biophys J 2004;87:754-763. (Pubitemid 39095058)
8. Bond PJ, Cuthbertson JM, Deol SS, Sansom MS. MD simulations of spontaneous membrane protein/detergent micelle formation. J Am Chem Soc 2004;126:15948-15949. (Pubitemid 39627590)
9. Grossfield A, Feller SE, Pitman MC. Convergence of molecular dynamics simulations of membrane proteins. Proteins 2007;67:31-40. (Pubitemid 46340124)
10. Feig M, Im W, Brooks CL. Implicit solvation based on generalized born theory in different dielectric environments. J Chem Phys 2004;120:903-911.
11. Lazaridis T. Effective energy function for proteins in lipid membranes. Proteins 2003;52:176-192. (Pubitemid 36828942)
12. Lazaridis T. Implicit solvent simulations of peptide interactions with anionic lipid membranes. Proteins 2005;58:518-527. (Pubitemid 40176025)
13. Efremov RG, Nolde DE, Vergoten G, Arseniev AS. A solvent model for simulations of peptides in bilayers. I. Membrane-promoting α-helix formation. Biophys J 1999;76:2448-2459.
14. Efremov RG, Nolde DE, Vergoten G, Arseniev AS. A solvent model for simulations of peptides in bilayers. II. Membrane-spanning α-helices. Biophys J 1999;76:2460-2471.
15. Im W, Feig M, Brooks CL, III. An implicit membrane generalized born theory for the study of structure, stability, and interactions of membrane proteins. Biophys J 2003;85:2900-2918.
16. Spassov VZ, Yan L, Szalma S. Introducing an implicit membrane in generalized Born/solvent accessibility continuum solvent models. J Phys Chem B 2002;106:8726-8738. (Pubitemid 35382883)
17. Ulmschneider MB, Ulmschneider JP, Sansom MSP, Di Nola A. A generalized born implicit membrane representation compared to experimental insertion free energies. Biophys J 2007;92:2338-2349.
18. Still WC, Tempczyk A, Hawley RC, Hendrickson T. Semianalytical treatment of solvation for molecular mechanics and dynamics. J Am Chem Soc 1990;112:6127-6129.
19. Tanizaki S, Feig M. A generalized born formalism for heterogeneous dielectric environments: application to the implicit modeling of biological membranes. J Chem Phys 2005;122:124706.
20. Tanizaki S, Feig M. Molecular dynamics simulations of large integral membrane proteins with an implicit membrane model. J Phys Chem B 2006;110:548-556. (Pubitemid 43133578)
21. Im W, Brooks CL, III. De novo folding of membrane proteins: an exploration of the structure and NMR properties of the fd coat protein. J Mol Biol 2004;337:513-519. (Pubitemid 38326873)
22. Im W, Brooks CL, III. Interfacial folding and membrane insertion of designed peptides studied by molecular dynamics simulations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005;102:6771-6776.
23. Im W, Chen JH, Brooks CL, III. Peptide and protein folding and conformational equilibria: theoretical treatment of electrostatics and hydrogen bonding with implicit solvent models. In: Baldwin R, Baker D, editors. Peptide solvation and H-bonds, Vol.72: Advances in protein chemistry. San Diego: Elsevier Academic Press; 2006. pp 173-198.
24. Lee J, Im W. Implementation and application of helix-helix distance and crossing angle restraint potentials. J Comput Chem 2007;28:669-680. (Pubitemid 46353602)
25. Ulmschneider JP, Ulmschneider MB, Di Nola A. Monte Carlo folding of trans-membrane helical peptides in an implicit generalized Born membrane. Proteins 2007;69:297-308. (Pubitemid 47429292)
26. Bu L, Im W, Brooks CL, III. Membrane assembly of simple helix homo-oligomers studied via molecular dynamics simulations. Biophys J 2007;92:854-863.
27. Ulmschneider JP, Ulmschneider MB. Folding simulations of the trans-membrane helix of virus protein U in an implicit membrane model. J Chem Theory Comput 2007;3:2335-2346.
28. Killian JA. Synthetic peptides as models for intrinsic membrane proteins. FEBS Lett 2003;555:134-138. (Pubitemid 37431110)
29. de Planque MRR, Killian JA. Protein-lipid interactions studied with designed transmembrane peptides: role of hydrophobic matching and interfacial anchoring (Review). Mol Membr Biol 2003;20:271-284.
30. Nymeyer H, Woolf TB, Garcia AE. Folding is not required for bilayer insertion: replica exchange simulations of an α-helical peptide with an explicit lipid bilayer. Proteins 2005;59:783-790. (Pubitemid 40695853)
31. Qiu D, Shenkin PS, Hollinger FP, Still WC. The GB/SA continuum model for solvation. A fast analytical method for the calculation of approximate born radii. J Phys Chem A 1997;101:3005-3014. (Pubitemid 127580882)
32. Jorgensen WL, Ulmschneider JP, Tirado-Rives J. Free energies of hydration from a generalized born model and an all-atom force field. J Phys Chem B 2004;108:16264-16270.
33. Parsegian A. Energy of an ion crossing a low dielectric membrane: solutions to four relevant electrostatic problems. Nature 1969;221:844-846.
34. Ulmschneider JP, Ulmschneider MB. Hippo 1.0: Biowerkzeug Limited; 2008.
35. Ulmschneider JP, Jorgensen WL. Monte Carlo backbone sampling for polypeptides with variable bond angles and dihedral angles using concerted rotations and a Gaussian bias. J Chem Phys 2003;118:4261-4271.
36. Jorgensen WL, Maxwell DS, Tirado-Rives J. Development and testing of the OPLS all-atom force field on conformational energetics and properties of organic liquids. J Am Chem Soc 1996;118:11225-11236. (Pubitemid 26399746)
37. Ulmschneider JP, Jorgensen WL. Monte Carlo backbone sampling for nucleic acids using concerted rotations including variable bond angles. J Phys Chem B 2004;108:16883-16892.
38. Ulmschneider JP, Jorgensen WL. Polypeptide folding using Monte Carlo sampling, concerted rotation, and continuum solvation. J Am Chem Soc 2004;126:1849-1857. (Pubitemid 38222770)
39. Ulmschneider JP, Ulmschneider MB, Di Nola A. Monte Carlo vs molecular dynamics for all-atom polypeptide folding simulations. J Phys Chem B 2006;110:16733-16742. (Pubitemid 44373403)
40. Andersen HC. Rattle: A "velocity" version of the SHAKE algorithm for molecular dynamics calculations. J Comput Phys 1983;52:24-34.
41. Berendsen HJC, van der Spoel D, van Drunen R. GROMACS: a message-passing parallel molecular dynamics implementation. Comput Phys Commun 1995;95:43-56.
42. van Gunsteren WF, Kruger P, Billeter SR, Mark AE, Eising AA, Scott WRP, Huneberger PH, Tironi IG. Biomolecular simulation: the GROMOS96 manual and user guide. Groningen & Zurich: Biomos & Hochschulverlag AG an der ETH Zurich; 1996.
43. Berendsen HJC, Postma JPM, van Gunsteren WF, Hermans J. Intermolecular forces. Dordrecht: Reidel; 1981.
44. Berger O, Edholm O, Jahnig F. Molecular dynamics simulations of a fluid bilayer of dipalmitoylphosphatidycholine at full hydration, constant pressure and constant temperature. Biophys J 1997;72: 2002-2013. (Pubitemid 27184429)
45. Hess B, Bekker H, Berendsen HJC, Fraaije JGEMJ. LINCS: a linear constraint solver for molecular simulations. J Comp Chem 1997;18:1463-1472. (Pubitemid 127637344)
46. Berendsen HJC, Postma JPM, van Gunsteren WF, DiNola A, Haak JR. Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J Chem Phys 1984;81:3684-3690.
47. Ulmschneider MB, Ulmschneider JP. Membrane adsorption, folding, insertion and translocation of synthetic trans-membrane peptides. Mol Membr Biol 2008;25:245-257.
48. Ulmschneider MB, Tieleman DP, Sansom MSP. Interactions of a transmembrane helix and a membrane: comparative simulations of bacteriorhodopsin helix A. J Phys Chem B 2004;108:10149-10159.
49. Jorgensen WL, Madura JD, Swenson CJ. Optimized intermolecular potential functions for liquid hydrocarbons. J Am Chem Soc 1984;106:6638-6646. (Pubitemid 14667385)
50. Berger O, Edholm O, Jahnig F. Molecular dynamics simulations of a fluid bilayer of dipalmitoylphosphatidycholine at full hydration, constant pressure and constant temperature. Biophys J 1997;72:2002-2013. (Pubitemid 27184429)
51. Lide DR, editor. CRC handbook of chemistry and physics, Internet version 2005. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2005. Available at: http://www.hbcpnetbase.com.
52. Zhou RH, Berne BJ. Can a continuum solvent model reproduce the free energy landscape of a beta-hairpin folding in water? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99:12777-12782.
53. Nymeyer H, Garcia AE. Simulation of the folding equilibrium of a-helical peptides: a comparison of the generalized born approximation with explicit solvent. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100:13934-13939. (Pubitemid 37499169)
54. Daidone I, Ulmschneider MB, Di Nola A, Amadei A, Smith JC. Dehydration-driven solvent exposure of hydrophobic surfaces as a driving force in peptide folding. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007;104:15230-15235. (Pubitemid 47502901)
55. Fan H, Mark AE, Zhu J, Honig B. Comparative study of generalized born models: protein dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005;102:6760-6764. (Pubitemid 40675389)
56. Bojan Zagrovic VP. Solvent viscosity dependence of the folding rate of a small protein: distributed computing study. J Comput Chem 2003;24:1432-1436.
57. Feig M. Kinetics from implicit solvent simulations of biomolecules as a function of viscosity. J Chem Theory Comput 2007;3:1734-1748.
58. Feig M, Chocholoušová J, Tanizaki S. Extending the horizon: towards the efficient modeling of large biomolecular complexes in atomic detail. Theor Chem Acc: Theory Comput Model (Theor Chim Acta) 2006;116:194-205.
59. Popot JL, Engelman DM. Membrane-protein folding and oligomerization - the 2-stage model. Biochemistry 1990;29:4031-4037. (Pubitemid 20145635)
60. White SH, von Heijne G. Transmembrane helices before, during, and after insertion. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2005;15:378-386. (Pubitemid 41073827)