Determination of solution structures of proteins up to 40 kDa using CS-Rosetta with sparse NMR data from deuterated samples

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 109, Issue 27, 2012, Pages 10873-10878

  Lange, Oliver F ^a,b   Rossi, Paolo ^c   Sgourakis, Nikolaos G ^d   Song, Yifan ^d   Lee, Hsiau Wei ^e   Aramini, James M ^c   Ertekin, Asli ^c   Xiao, Rong ^c   Acton, Thomas B ^c   Montelione, Gaetano T ^c,f   Baker, David ^d,g  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b INSTITUTE OF EPIDEMIOLOGY   (Germany)

^c RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^f RUTGERS ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Genetic algorithms; Maltose binding protein; Nuclear magnetic resonance; Sparse data; Structural genomics

Indexed keywords

AMIDE; BAMC PROTEIN; BETA CYCLODEXTRIN; MALTOSE BINDING PROTEIN; METHYL GROUP; PROTEIN; SENSORY RHODOPSIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CARBON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; CARBOXY TERMINAL SEQUENCE; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; NITROGEN NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; NUCLEAR OVERHAUSER EFFECT; PARTICLE SIZE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DETERMINATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PROTON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PROTON TRANSPORT; RASREC CS ROSETTA ANALYSIS; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; DEUTERIUM EXCHANGE MEASUREMENT; GENOMICS; HUMANS; MALTOSE-BINDING PROTEINS; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, BIOMOLECULAR; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSORY RHODOPSINS; SOLUTIONS;

EID: 84863570589     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1203013109     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Pervushin K, Riek R, Wider G, Wuthrich K (1997) Attenuated T2 relaxation by mutual cancellation of dipole-dipole coupling and chemical shift anisotropy indicates an avenue to NMR structures of very large biological macromolecules in solution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:12366-12371.
2. Markley JL, Putter I, Jardetzky O (1968) High-resolution nuclear magnetic resonance spectra of selectively deuterated staphylococcal nuclease. Science 161:1249-1251.
3. Tjandra N, Bax A (1997) Direct measurement of distances and angles in biomolecules by NMR in a dilute liquid crystalline medium. Science 278:1111-1114. (Pubitemid 27517889)
4. Mueller GA, et al. (2000) Global folds of proteins with low densities of NOEs using residual dipolar couplings: Application to the 370-residue maltodextrin-binding protein. J Mol Biol 300:197-212.
5. Schwieters CD, et al. (2010) Solution structure of the 128 kDa enzyme I dimer from Escherichia coli and its 146 kDa complex with HPr using residual dipolar couplings and small- and wide-angle X-ray scattering. J Am Chem Soc 132:13026-13045.
6. Frueh DP, et al. (2008) Dynamic thiolation-thioesterase structure of a non-ribosomal peptide synthetase. Nature 454:903-906.
7. Tugarinov V, Choy WY, Orekhov VY, Kay LE (2005) Solution NMR-derived global fold of a monomeric 82-kDa enzyme. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:622-627. (Pubitemid 40282715)
8. Gelis I, et al. (2007) Structural basis for signal-sequence recognition by the translocase motor SecA as determined by NMR. Cell 131:756-769. (Pubitemid 350087200)
9. Grzesiek S, Bax A (1993) Measurement of amide proton exchange rates and NOEs with water in 13C/15N-enriched calcineurin B. J Biomol NMR 3:627-638. (Pubitemid 2013628)
10. LeMaster DM, Kay LE, Brunger AT, Prestegard JH (1988) Protein dynamics and distance determination by NOE measurements. FEBS Lett 236:71-76.
11. Rosen MK, et al. (1996) Selective methyl group protonation of perdeuterated proteins. J Mol Biol 263:627-636. (Pubitemid 26395055)
12. Gardner KH, Rosen MK, Kay LE (1997) Global folds of highly deuterated, methylprotonated proteins by multidimensional NMR. Biochemistry 36:1389-1401. (Pubitemid 27074963)
13. Gardner KH, Kay LE (1998) The use of 2H, 13C, 15N multidimensional NMR to study the structure and dynamics of proteins. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 27:357-406. (Pubitemid 28286019)
14. Venters RA, et al. (1995) High-level 2H/13C/15N labeling of proteins for NMR studies. J Biomol NMR 5:339-344.
15. Fernandez C, Hilty C, Wider G, Guntert P, Wuthrich K (2004) NMR structure of the integral membrane protein OmpX. J Mol Biol 336:1211-1221. (Pubitemid 38229708)
16. Hiller S, et al. (2008) Solution structure of the integral human membrane protein VDAC-1 in detergent micelles. Science 321:1206-1210.
17. Kainosho M, et al. (2006) Optimal isotope labelling for NMR protein structure determinations. Nature 440:52-57. (Pubitemid 43336263)
18. Lange OF, Baker D (2012) Resolution-adapted recombination of structural features significantly improves sampling in restraint-guided structure calculation. Proteins 80:884-895.
19. Raman S, et al. (2010) NMR structure determination for larger proteins using backbone-only data. Science 327:1014-1018.
20. Guntert P, Mumenthaler C, Wuthrich K (1997) Torsion angle dynamics for NMR structure calculation with the new program DYANA. J Mol Biol 273:283-298. (Pubitemid 27460230)
21. Huang YJ, Tejero R, Powers R, Montelione GT (2006) A topology-constrained distance network algorithm for protein structure determination from NOESY data. Proteins 62:587-603. (Pubitemid 43191247)
22. Rieping W, et al. (2007) ARIA2: Automated NOE assignment and data integration in NMR structure calculation. Bioinformatics 23:381-382. (Pubitemid 46323164)
23. Herrmann T, Guntert P, Wuthrich K (2002) Protein NMR structure determination with automated NOE assignment using the new software CANDID and the torsion angle dynamics algorithm DYANA. J Mol Biol 319:209-227. (Pubitemid 34729497)
24. Wunderlich Z, et al. (2004) The protein target list of the Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium. Proteins 56:181-187.
25. Warner LR, et al. (2011) Structure of the BamC two-domain protein obtained by Rosetta with a limited NMR dataset. J Mol Biol 411:83-95.
26. Gautier A, Mott HR, Bostock MJ, Kirkpatrick JP, Nietlispach D (2010) Structure determination of the seven-helix transmembrane receptor sensory rhodopsin II by solution NMR spectroscopy. Nat Struct Mol Biol 17:768-774.
27. Guntert P (2004) Automated NMR structure calculation with CYANA. Methods Mol Biol 278:353-378.
28. Tang C, Schwieters CD, Clore GM (2007) Open-to-closed transition in apo maltose-binding protein observed by paramagnetic NMR. Nature 449:1078-1082. (Pubitemid 350014601)
29. Duan X, Quiocho FA (2002) Structural evidence for a dominant role of nonpolar interactions in the binding of a transport/chemosensory receptor to its highly polar ligands. Biochemistry 41:706-712. (Pubitemid 34061970)
30. Royant A, et al. (2001) X-ray structure of sensory rhodopsin II at 2.1-Å resolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:10131-10136. (Pubitemid 32802986)
31. Albrecht R, Zeth K (2011) Structural basis of outer membrane protein biogenesis in bacteria. J Biol Chem 286:27792-27803.
32. Isaacson RL, et al. (2007) A new labeling method for methyl transverse relaxation-optimized spectroscopy NMR spectra of alanine residues. J Am Chem Soc 129:15428-15429.
33. Fesik SW, Gampe RT, Jr, Zuiderweg ER, Kohlbrenner WE,Weigl D (1989) Heteronuclear three-dimensional NMR spectroscopy applied to CMP-KDO synthetase (27.5 kD). Biochem Biophys Res Commun 159:842-847. (Pubitemid 19089828)
34. Popovych N, Tzeng SR, Tonelli M, Ebright RH, Kalodimos CG (2009) Structural basis for cAMP-mediated allosteric control of the catabolite activator protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:6927-6932.
35. Schueler-Furman O, Wang C, Bradley P, Misura K, Baker D (2005) Progress in modeling of protein structures and interactions. Science 310:638-642. (Pubitemid 41528148)
36. Tyka MD, et al. (2011) Alternate states of proteins revealed by detailed energy landscape mapping. J Mol Biol 405:607-618.
37. Qian B, et al. (2007) High-resolution structure prediction and the crystallographic phase problem. Nature 450:259-264. (Pubitemid 350100534)
38. Verma A, Wenzel W (2007) Protein structure prediction by all-atom free-energy refinement. BMC Struct Biol 7:12-27.
39. Ramelot TA, et al. (2009) Improving NMR protein structure quality by Rosetta refinement: A molecular replacement study. Proteins 75:147-167.
40. Bhattacharya A, Tejero R, Montelione GT (2007) Evaluating protein structures determined by structural genomics consortia. Proteins 66:778-795.
41. Guntert P (2009) Automated structure determination from NMR spectra. Eur Biophys J 38:129-143.
42. Leaver-Fay A, et al. (2011) ROSETTA3: An object-oriented software suite for the simulation and design of macromolecules. Methods Enzymol 487:545-574.
43. Herrmann T, Guntert P, Wuthrich K (2002) Protein NMR structure determination with automated NOE assignment using the new software CANDID and the torsion angle dynamics algorithm DYANA. J Mol Biol 319:209-227. (Pubitemid 34729497)
44. Farrow NA, et al. (1994) Backbone dynamics of a free and phosphopeptide-complexed Src homology 2 domain studied by 15N NMR relaxation. Biochemistry 33:5984-6003. (Pubitemid 24184605)
45. Dunbrack RL, Jr (2002) Rotamer libraries in the 21st century. Curr Opin Struct Biol 12:431-440.