To trim or not to trim Progression and control of DSB end resection

Cell Cycle

Volumn 12, Issue 12, 2013, Pages 1848-1860

  Granata, Magda ^a   Panigada, Davide ^a   Galati, Elena ^a   Lazzaro, Federico ^a   Pellicioli, Achille ^a   Plevani, Paolo ^a   Muzi Falconi, Marco ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

Author keywords

Chromatin; DNA repair; Double strand breaks; Homologous recombination; Non homologous end joining; Nucleases

Indexed keywords

EXONUCLEASE; HELICASE;

ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE PHASE; CELL SURVIVAL; DNA DEGRADATION; DNA END JOINING REPAIR; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; ENZYME ACTIVITY; EUKARYOTIC CELL; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; HUMAN;

EUKARYOTA;

EID: 84879335990     PISSN: 15384101     EISSN: 15514005     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/cc.25042     Document Type: Article

References (153)

1. Hoeijmakers JHJ. DNA damage, aging, and cancer. N Engl J Med 2009; 361:1475-85; PMID:19812404; http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra0804615
2. San Filippo J, Sung P, Klein H. Mechanism of eukaryotic homologous recombination. Annu Rev Biochem 2008; 77:229-57; PMID:18275380; http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biochem.77.061306.125255
3. Lieber MR. The mechanism of double-strand DNA break repair by the nonhomologous DNA endjoining pathway. Annu Rev Biochem 2010; 79:181-211; PMID:20192759; http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biochem.052308.093131
4. Aylon Y, Liefshitz B, Kupiec M. The CDK regulates repair of double-strand breaks by homologous recombination during the cell cycle. EMBO J 2004; 23:4868-75; PMID:15549137; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7600469 (Pubitemid 40069716)
5. Ira G, Pellicioli A, Balijja A, Wang X, Fiorani S, Carotenuto W, et al. DNA end resection, homologous recombination and DNA damage checkpoint activation require CDK1. Nature 2004; 431:1011-7; PMID:15496928; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1038/nature02964 (Pubitemid 39434425)
6. Chapman JR, Taylor MRG, Boulton SJ. Playing the end game: DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice. Mol Cell 2012; 47:497-510; PMID:22920291; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel. 2012.07.029
7. Liu J, Xu L, Zhong J, Liao J, Li J, Xu X. Protein phosphatase PP4 is involved in NHEJ-mediated repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Cell Cycle 2012; 11:2643-9; PMID:22732494; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.20957
8. Zou L, Elledge SJ. Sensing DNA damage through ATRIP recognition of RPA-ssDNA complexes. Science 2003; 300:1542-8; PMID:12791985; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1083430 (Pubitemid 36682880)
9. Wellinger RJ, Zakian VA. Everything you ever wanted to know about Saccharomyces cerevisiae telomeres: Beginning to end. Genetics 2012; 191:1073-105; PMID:22879408; http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.111.137851
10. Longhese MP, Bonetti D, Manfrini N, Clerici M. Mechanisms and regulation of DNA end resection. EMBO J 2010; 29:2864-74; PMID:20647996; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2010.165
11. Symington LS, Gautier J. Double-strand break end resection and repair pathway choice. Annu Rev Genet 2011; 45:247-71; PMID:21910633; http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genet-110410-132435
12. Lisby M, Barlow JH, Burgess RC, Rothstein R. Choreography of the DNA damage response: Spatiotemporal relationships among checkpoint and repair proteins. Cell 2004; 118:699-713; PMID:15369670; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. cell.2004.08.015 (Pubitemid 39221730)
13. D'Amours D, Jackson SP. The Mre11 complex: At the crossroads of dna repair and checkpoint signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2002; 3:317-27; PMID:11988766; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm805 (Pubitemid 34619266)
14. Alani E, Padmore R, Kleckner N. Analysis of wildtype and rad50 mutants of yeast suggests an intimate relationship between meiotic chromosome synapsis and recombination. Cell 1990; 61:419-36; PMID:2185891; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ 0092-8674(90)90524-I
15. Ivanov EL, Korolev VG, Fabre F. XRS2, a DNA repair gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, is needed for meiotic recombination. Genetics 1992; 132:651-64; PMID:1468624
16. Nairz K, Klein F. mre11S-a yeast mutation that blocks double-strand-break processing and permits nonhomologous synapsis in meiosis. Genes Dev 1997; 11:2272-90; PMID:9303542; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.11.17.2272 (Pubitemid 27387977)
17. Bressan DA, Baxter BK, Petrini JHJ. The Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 protein complex facilitates homologous recombination-based double-strand break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 1999; 19:7681-7; PMID:10523656 (Pubitemid 29493431)
18. Ivanov EL, Sugawara N, White CI, Fabre F, Haber JE. Mutations in XRS2 and RAD50 delay but do not prevent mating-type switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 1994; 14:3414-25; PMID:8164689 (Pubitemid 24132752)
19. Lee SE, Moore JK, Holmes A, Umezu K, Kolodner RD, Haber JE. Saccharomyces Ku70, mre11/rad50 and RPA proteins regulate adaptation to G2/M arrest after DNA damage. Cell 1998; 94:399-409; PMID:9708741; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092- 8674(00)81482-8 (Pubitemid 28376083)
20. Furuse M, Nagase Y, Tsubouchi H, Murakami-Murofushi K, Shibata T, Ohta K. Distinct roles of two separable in vitro activities of yeast Mre11 in mitotic and meiotic recombination. EMBO J 1998; 17:6412-25; PMID:9799249; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/17.21.6412 (Pubitemid 28497813)
21. Paull TT, Gellert M. The 3' to 5' exonuclease activity of Mre 11 facilitates repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Mol Cell 1998; 1:969-79; PMID:9651580; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80097-0 (Pubitemid 128379258)
22. Trujillo KM, Sung P. DNA structure-specific nuclease activities in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad50*Mre11 complex. J Biol Chem 2001; 276:35458-64; PMID:11454871; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M105482200
23. Moreau S, Ferguson JR, Symington LS. The nuclease activity of Mre11 is required for meiosis but not for mating type switching, end joining, or telomere maintenance. Mol Cell Biol 1999; 19:556-66; PMID:9858579 (Pubitemid 29018457)
24. Llorente B, Symington LS. The Mre11 nuclease is not required for 5' to 3' resection at multiple HO-induced double-strand breaks. Mol Cell Biol 2004; 24:9682-94; PMID:15485933; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.24.21.9682-9694.2004 (Pubitemid 39391702)
25. Keeney S, Kleckner N. Covalent protein-DNA complexes at the 5' strand termini of meiosis-specific double-strand breaks in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995; 92:11274-8; PMID:7479978; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.92.24.11274
26. Cartagena-Lirola H, Guerini I, Viscardi V, Lucchini G, Longhese MP. Budding yeast Sae2 is an in vivo target of the Mec1 and Tel1 checkpoint kinases during meiosis. Cell Cycle 2006; 5:1549-59; PMID:16861895; http://dx.doi.org/10. 4161/cc.5.14.2916 (Pubitemid 44091976)
27. Lobachev KS, Gordenin DA, Resnick MA. The Mre11 complex is required for repair of hairpincapped double-strand breaks and prevention of chromosome rearrangements. Cell 2002; 108:183-93; PMID:11832209; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ S0092-8674(02)00614-1 (Pubitemid 34161139)
28. Lengsfeld BM, Rattray AJ, Bhaskara V, Ghirlando R, Paull TT. Sae2 is an endonuclease that processes hairpin DNA cooperatively with the Mre11/Rad50/Xrs2 complex. Mol Cell 2007; 28:638-51; PMID:18042458; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. molcel. 2007.11.001 (Pubitemid 350137798)
29. Clerici M, Mantiero D, Lucchini G, Longhese MP. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sae2 protein promotes resection and bridging of double strand break ends. J Biol Chem 2005; 280:38631-8; PMID:16162495; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/ jbc.M508339200 (Pubitemid 43853765)
30. Clerici M, Mantiero D, Lucchini G, Longhese MP. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sae2 protein negatively regulates DNA damage checkpoint signalling. EMBO Rep 2006; 7:212-8; PMID:16374511; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor. 7400593
31. Sartori AA, Lukas C, Coates J, Mistrik M, Fu S, Bartek J, et al. Human CtIP promotes DNA end resection. Nature 2007; 450:509-14; PMID:17965729; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature06337 (Pubitemid 350190253)
32. Huertas P, Cortés-Ledesma F, Sartori AA, Aguilera A, Jackson SP. CDK targets Sae2 to control DNAend resection and homologous recombination. Nature 2008; 455:689-92; PMID:18716619; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature07215
33. Huertas P, Jackson SP. Human CtIP mediates cell cycle control of DNA end resection and double strand break repair. J Biol Chem 2009; 284:9558-65; PMID:19202191; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc. M808906200
34. Zhu Z, Chung WH, Shim EY, Lee SE, Ira G. Sgs1 helicase and two nucleases Dna2 and Exo1 resect DNA double-strand break ends. Cell 2008; 134:981-94; PMID:18805091; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.08.037
35. Mimitou EP, Symington LS. Sae2, Exo1 and Sgs1 collaborate in DNA double-strand break processing. Nature 2008; 455:770-4; PMID:18806779; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature07312
36. Zierhut C, Diffley JFX. Break dosage, cell cycle stage and DNA replication influence DNA double strand break response. EMBO J 2008; 27:1875-85; PMID:18511906; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2008.111 (Pubitemid 351960208)
37. Paull TT. Making the best of the loose ends: Mre11/Rad50 complexes and Sae2 promote DNA double-strand break resection. DNA Repair (Amst) 2010; 9:1283-91; PMID:21050828; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2010.09.015
38. Tran PT, Erdeniz N, Symington LS, Liskay RM. EXO1-A multi-tasking eukaryotic nuclease. DNA Repair (Amst) 2004; 3:1549-59; PMID:15474417; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2004.05.015 (Pubitemid 39335688)
39. Moreau S, Morgan EA, Symington LS. Overlapping functions of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mre11, Exo1 and Rad27 nucleases in DNA metabolism. Genetics 2001; 159:1423-33; PMID:11779786 (Pubitemid 34087586)
40. Schaetzlein S, Kodandaramireddy NR, Ju Z, Lechel A, Stepczynska A, Lilli DR, et al. Exonuclease-1 deletion impairs DNA damage signaling and prolongs lifespan of telomere-dysfunctional mice. Cell 2007; 130:863-77; PMID:17803909; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.08.029 (Pubitemid 47332579)
41. Tsubouchi H, Ogawa H. Exo1 roles for repair of DNA double-strand breaks and meiotic crossing over in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell 2000; 11:2221-33; PMID:10888664 (Pubitemid 30489910)
42. Nicolette ML, Lee K, Guo Z, Rani M, Chow JM, Lee SE, et al. Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 and Sae2 promote 5' strand resection of DNA double-strand breaks. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2010; 17:1478-85; PMID:21102445; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.1957
43. Niu H, Chung WH, Zhu Z, Kwon Y, Zhao W, Chi P, et al. Mechanism of the ATP-dependent DNA endresection machinery from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 2010; 467:108-11; PMID:20811460; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature09318
44. Lewis LK, Karthikeyan G, Westmoreland JW, Resnick MA. Differential suppression of DNA repair deficiencies of Yeast rad50, mre11 and xrs2 mutants by EXO1 and TLC1 (the RNA component of telomerase). Genetics 2002; 160:49-62; PMID:11805044 (Pubitemid 34118270)
45. El-Shemerly M, Janscak P, Hess D, Jiricny J, Ferrari S. Degradation of human exonuclease 1b upon DNA synthesis inhibition. Cancer Res 2005; 65:3604-9; PMID:15867354; http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-4069 (Pubitemid 40616336)
46. Bolderson E, Tomimatsu N, Richard DJ, Boucher D, Kumar R, Pandita TK, et al. Phosphorylation of Exo1 modulates homologous recombination repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Nucleic Acids Res 2010; 38:1821-31; PMID:20019063; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp1164
47. Morin I, Ngo HP, Greenall A, Zubko MK, Morrice N, Lydall D. Checkpoint-dependent phosphorylation of Exo1 modulates the DNA damage response. EMBO J 2008; 27:2400-10; PMID:18756267; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2008.171
48. Engels K, Giannattasio M, Muzi-Falconi M, Lopes M, Ferrari S. 14-3-3 Proteins regulate exonuclease 1-dependent processing of stalled replication forks. PLoS Genet 2011; 7:e1001367; PMID:21533173; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pgen.1001367
49. Nakada D, Hirano Y, Sugimoto K. Requirement of the Mre11 complex and exonuclease 1 for activation of the Mec1 signaling pathway. Mol Cell Biol 2004; 24:10016-25; PMID:15509802; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.24.22.10016-10025.2004 (Pubitemid 39458825)
50. Gravel S, Chapman JR, Magill C, Jackson SP. DNA helicases Sgs1 and BLM promote DNA doublestrand break resection. Genes Dev 2008; 22:2767-72; PMID:18923075; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.503108
51. Cejka P, Cannavo E, Polaczek P, Masuda-Sasa T, Pokharel S, Campbell JL, et al. DNA end resection by Dna2-Sgs1-RPA and its stimulation by Top3-Rmi1 and Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2. Nature 2010; 467:112-6; PMID:20811461; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1038/nature09355
52. Budd ME, Choe WC, Campbell JL. DNA2 encodes a DNA helicase essential for replication of eukaryotic chromosomes. J Biol Chem 1995; 270:26766-9; PMID:7592912; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.270.45.26766
53. Budd ME, Campbell JL. The pattern of sensitivity of yeast dna2 mutants to DNA damaging agents suggests a role in DSB and postreplication repair pathways. Mutat Res 2000; 459:173-86; PMID:10812329; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0921- 8777(99)00072-5 (Pubitemid 30254304)
54. Chen X, Niu H, Chung WH, Zhu Z, Papusha A, Shim EY, et al. Cell cycle regulation of DNA doublestrand break end resection by Cdk1-dependent Dna2 phosphorylation. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2011; 18:1015-9; PMID:21841787; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2105
55. Nimonkar AV, Genschel J, Kinoshita E, Polaczek P, Campbell JL, Wyman C, et al. BLM-DNA2-RPA-MRN and EXO1-BLM-RPA-MRN constitute two DNA end resection machineries for human DNA break repair. Genes Dev 2011; 25:350-62; PMID:21325134; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.2003811
56. Peng G, Dai H, Zhang W, Hsieh HJ, Pan MR, Park YY, et al. Human nuclease/helicase DNA2 alleviates replication stress by promoting DNA end resection. Cancer Res 2012; 72:2802-13; PMID:22491672; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3152
57. Karanja KK, Cox SW, Duxin JP, Stewart SA, Campbell JL. DNA2 and EXO1 in replication-coupled, homology-directed repair and in the interplay between HDR and the FA/BRCA network. Cell Cycle 2012; 11:3983-96; PMID:22987153; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.22215
58. van Attikum H, Gasser SM. Crosstalk between histone modifications during the DNA damage response. Trends Cell Biol 2009; 19:207-17; PMID:19342239; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2009.03.001
59. Redon CE, Nakamura AJ, Martin OA, Parekh PR, Weyemi US, Bonner WM. Recent developments in the use of ?-H2AX as a quantitative DNA doublestrand break biomarker. Aging (Albany NY) 2011; 3:168-74; PMID:21325706
60. Soria G, Polo SE, Almouzni G. Prime, repair, restore: The active role of chromatin in the DNA damage response. Mol Cell 2012; 46:722-34; PMID:22749398; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel. 2012.06.002
61. Seeber A, Hauer M, Gasser SM. Nucleosome remodelers in double-strand break repair. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2013; In press; PMID:23352131; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2012.12.008
62. Huang J, Laurent BC. A Role for the RSC chromatin remodeler in regulating cohesion of sister chromatid arms. Cell Cycle 2004; 3:973-5; PMID:15254404; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.3.8.1014 (Pubitemid 40268642)
63. Chambers AL, Downs JA. The RSC and INO80 chromatin-remodeling complexes in DNA double-strand break repair. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci 2012; 110:229-61; PMID:22749148; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387665-2.00009-2
64. Koyama H, Itoh M, Miyahara K, Tsuchiya E. Abundance of the RSC nucleosome-remodeling complex is important for the cells to tolerate DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Lett 2002; 531:215-21; PMID:12417315; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0014-5793(02)03504-4 (Pubitemid 35341197)
65. Chai B, Huang J, Cairns BR, Laurent BC. Distinct roles for the RSC and Swi/Snf ATP-dependent chromatin remodelers in DNA double-strand break repair. Genes Dev 2005; 19:1656-61; PMID:16024655; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1273105 (Pubitemid 41058359)
66. Kent NA, Chambers AL, Downs JA. Dual chromatin remodeling roles for RSC during DNA double strand break induction and repair at the yeast MAT locus. J Biol Chem 2007; 282:27693-701; PMID:17652077; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc. M704707200 (Pubitemid 47529477)
67. Shim EY, Ma JL, Oum JH, Yanez Y, Lee SE. The yeast chromatin remodeler RSC complex facilitates end joining repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Mol Cell Biol 2005; 25:3934-44; PMID:15870268; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.25.10.3934- 3944.2005 (Pubitemid 40617645)
68. Shim EY, Hong SJ, Oum JH, Yanez Y, Zhang Y, Lee SE. RSC mobilizes nucleosomes to improve accessibility of repair machinery to the damaged chromatin. Mol Cell Biol 2007; 27:1602-13; PMID:17178837; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1128/MCB.01956-06
69. Liang B, Qiu J, Ratnakumar K, Laurent BC. RSC functions as an early double-strand-break sensor in the cell's response to DNA damage. Curr Biol 2007; 17:1432-7; PMID:17689960; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.07.035 (Pubitemid 47259384)
70. Downs JA, Allard S, Jobin-Robitaille O, Javaheri A, Auger A, Bouchard N, et al. Binding of chromatinmodifying activities to phosphorylated histone H2A at DNA damage sites. Mol Cell 2004; 16:979-90; PMID:15610740; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.molcel. 2004.12.003 (Pubitemid 40018407)
71. van Attikum H, Fritsch O, Hohn B, Gasser SM. Recruitment of the INO80 complex by H2A phosphorylation links ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling with DNA double-strand break repair. Cell 2004; 119:777-88; PMID:15607975; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2004.11.033 (Pubitemid 40017685)
72. van Attikum H, Fritsch O, Gasser SM. Distinct roles for SWR1 and INO80 chromatin remodeling complexes at chromosomal double-strand breaks. EMBO J 2007; 26:4113-25; PMID:17762868; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7601835 (Pubitemid 47462094)
73. Ogiwara H, Enomoto T, Seki M. The INO80 chromatin remodeling complex functions in sister chromatid cohesion. Cell Cycle 2007; 6:1090-5; PMID:17471029; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.6.9.4130 (Pubitemid 46708582)
74. Morrison AJ, Highland J, Krogan NJ, Arbel-Eden A, Greenblatt JF, Haber JE, et al. INO80 and gamma-H2AX interaction links ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling to DNA damage repair. Cell 2004; 119:767-75; PMID:15607974; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2004.11.037 (Pubitemid 40017684)
75. Papamichos-Chronakis M, Watanabe S, Rando OJ, Peterson CL. Global regulation of H2A.Z localization by the INO80 chromatin-remodeling enzyme is essential for genome integrity. Cell 2011; 144:200-13; PMID:21241891; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.12.021
76. Gospodinov A, Vaissiere T, Krastev DB, Legube G, Anachkova B, Herceg Z. Mammalian Ino80 mediates double-strand break repair through its role in DNA end strand resection. Mol Cell Biol 2011; 31:4735-45; PMID:21947284; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.06182-11
77. Awad S, Ryan D, Prochasson P, Owen-Hughes T, Hassan AH. The Snf2 homolog Fun30 acts as a homodimeric ATP-dependent chromatin-remodeling enzyme. J Biol Chem 2010; 285:9477-84; PMID:20075079; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc. M109.082149
78. Neves-Costa A, Will WR, Vetter AT, Miller JR, Varga-Weisz P. The SNF2-family member Fun30 promotes gene silencing in heterochromatic loci. PLoS One 2009; 4:e8111; PMID:19956593; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008111
79. Durand-Dubief M, Will WR, Petrini E, Theodorou D, Harris RR, Crawford MR, et al. SWI/SNF-like chromatin remodeling factor Fun30 supports point centromere function in S. cerevisiae. PLoS Genet 2012; 8:e1002974; PMID:23028372; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002974
80. Chen X, Cui D, Papusha A, Zhang X, Chu CD, Tang J, et al. The Fun30 nucleosome remodeller promotes resection of DNA double-strand break ends. Nature 2012; 489:576-80; PMID:22960743; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature11355
81. Costelloe T, Louge R, Tomimatsu N, Mukherjee B, Martini E, Khadaroo B, et al. The yeast Fun30 and human SMARCAD1 chromatin remodellers promote DNA end resection. Nature 2012; 489:581-4; PMID:22960744; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ nature11353
82. Eapen VV, Sugawara N, Tsabar M, Wu WH, Haber JE. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromatin remodeler Fun30 regulates DNA end resection and checkpoint deactivation. Mol Cell Biol 2012; 32:4727-40; PMID:23007155; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00566-12
83. Lazzaro F, Sapountzi V, Granata M, Pellicioli A, Vaze M, Haber JE, et al. Histone methyltransferase Dot1 and Rad9 inhibit single-stranded DNA accumulation at DSBs and uncapped telomeres. EMBO J 2008; 27:1502-12; PMID:18418382 (Pubitemid 351733336)
84. Dewar JM, Lydall D. Similarities and differences between "uncapped" telomeres and DNA doublestrand breaks. Chromosoma 2012; 121:117-30; PMID:22203190; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00412-011-0357-2
85. Wellinger RJ, Ethier K, Labrecque P, Zakian VA. Evidence for a new step in telomere maintenance. Cell 1996; 85:423-33; PMID:8616897; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81120-4 (Pubitemid 26160713)
86. Frank CJ, Hyde M, Greider CW. Regulation of telomere elongation by the cyclin-dependent kinase CDK1. Mol Cell 2006; 24:423-32; PMID:17070718; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2006.10.020 (Pubitemid 44647911)
87. Vodenicharov MD, Wellinger RJ. The cell division cycle puts up with unprotected telomeres: Cell cycle regulated telomere uncapping as a means to achieve telomere homeostasis. Cell Cycle 2007; 6:1161-7; PMID:17495544; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.6.10.4224 (Pubitemid 47327981)
88. Martina M, Clerici M, Baldo V, Bonetti D, Lucchini G, Longhese MP. A balance between Tel1 and Rif2 activities regulates nucleolytic processing and elongation at telomeres. Mol Cell Biol 2012; 32:1604-17; PMID:22354991; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.06547-11
89. Diede SJ, Gottschling DE. Exonuclease activity is required for sequence addition and Cdc13p loading at a de novo telomere. Curr Biol 2001; 11:1336-40; PMID:11553326; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00400-6 (Pubitemid 32835873)
90. Bonetti D, Martina M, Clerici M, Lucchini G, Longhese MP. Multiple pathways regulate 3' overhang generation at S. cerevisiae telomeres. Mol Cell 2009; 35:70-81; PMID:19595717; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2009.05.015
91. Larrivée M, LeBel C, Wellinger RJ. The generation of proper constitutive G-tails on yeast telomeres is dependent on the MRX complex. Genes Dev 2004; 18:1391-6; PMID:15198981; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1199404 (Pubitemid 38780626)
92. Chai W, Sfeir AJ, Hoshiyama H, Shay JW, Wright WE. The involvement of the Mre11/Rad50/Nbs1 complex in the generation of G-overhangs at human telomeres. EMBO Rep 2006; 7:225-30; PMID:16374507; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor. 7400600
93. Faure V, Coulon S, Hardy J, Géli V. Cdc13 and telomerase bind through different mechanisms at the lagging-and leading-strand telomeres. Mol Cell 2010; 38:842-52; PMID:20620955; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2010.05. 016
94. Garvik B, Carson M, Hartwell L. Single-stranded DNA arising at telomeres in cdc13 mutants may constitute a specific signal for the RAD9 checkpoint. Mol Cell Biol 1995; 15:6128-38; PMID:7565765
95. Zubko MK, Guillard S, Lydall D. Exo1 and Rad24 differentially regulate generation of ssDNA at telomeres of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cdc13-1 mutants. Genetics 2004; 168:103-15; PMID:15454530; http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics. 104.027904 (Pubitemid 39346582)
96. Foster SS, Zubko MK, Guillard S, Lydall D. MRX protects telomeric DNA at uncapped telomeres of budding yeast cdc13-1 mutants. DNA Repair (Amst) 2006; 5:840-51; PMID:16765654; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2006.04.005 (Pubitemid 43928887)
97. Ngo HP, Lydall D. Survival and growth of yeast without telomere capping by Cdc13 in the absence of Sgs1, Exo1, and Rad9. PLoS Genet 2010; 6:e1001072; PMID:20808892; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal. pgen.1001072
98. Dewar JM, Lydall D. Pif1-and Exo1-dependent nucleases coordinate checkpoint activation following telomere uncapping. EMBO J 2010; 29:4020-34; PMID:21045806; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2010.267
99. Maringele L, Lydall D. EXO1-dependent singlestranded DNA at telomeres activates subsets of DNA damage and spindle checkpoint pathways in budding yeast yku70Delta mutants. Genes Dev 2002; 16:1919-33; PMID:12154123; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.225102 (Pubitemid 34832921)
100. Vaze MB, Pellicioli A, Lee SE, Ira G, Liberi G, Arbel-Eden A, et al. Recovery from checkpointmediated arrest after repair of a double-strand break requires Srs2 helicase. Mol Cell 2002; 10:373-85; PMID:12191482; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00593-2 (Pubitemid 35007351)
101. Chung WH, Zhu Z, Papusha A, Malkova A, Ira G. Defective resection at DNA double-strand breaks leads to de novo telomere formation and enhances gene targeting. PLoS Genet 2010; 6:e1000948; PMID:20485519; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1371/journal. pgen.1000948
102. Daley JM, Palmbos PL, Wu D, Wilson TE. Nonhomologous end joining in yeast. Annu Rev Genet 2005; 39:431-51; PMID:16285867; http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/ annurev.genet.39.073003.113340 (Pubitemid 43011122)
103. Shim EY, Chung WH, Nicolette ML, Zhang Y, Davis M, Zhu Z, et al. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mre11/Rad50/Xrs2 and Ku proteins regulate association of Exo1 and Dna2 with DNA breaks. EMBO J 2010; 29:3370-80; PMID:20834227; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2010.219
104. Wasko BM, Holland CL, Resnick MA, Lewis LK. Inhibition of DNA double-strand break repair by the Ku heterodimer in mrx mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. DNA Repair (Amst) 2009; 8:162-9; PMID:18992851; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2008.09.010
105. Mimitou EP, Symington LS. Ku prevents Exo1 and Sgs1-dependent resection of DNA ends in the absence of a functional MRX complex or Sae2. EMBO J 2010; 29:3358-69; PMID:20729809; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2010.193
106. Clerici M, Mantiero D, Guerini I, Lucchini G, Longhese MP. The Yku70-Yku80 complex contributes to regulate double-strand break processing and checkpoint activation during the cell cycle. EMBO Rep 2008; 9:810-8; PMID:18600234; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/embor.2008.121
107. Barlow JH, Lisby M, Rothstein R. Differential regulation of the cellular response to DNA doublestrand breaks in G1. Mol Cell 2008; 30:73-85; PMID:18406328; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel. 2008.01.016 (Pubitemid 351470149)
108. Zhang Y, Hefferin ML, Chen L, Shim EY, Tseng HM, Kwon Y, et al. Role of Dnl4-Lif1 in nonhomologous end-joining repair complex assembly and suppression of homologous recombination. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2007; 14:639-46; PMID:17589524; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb1261 (Pubitemid 47037068)
109. Wu D, Topper LM, Wilson TE. Recruitment and dissociation of nonhomologous end joining proteins at a DNA double-strand break in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 2008; 178:1237-49; PMID:18245831; http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics. 107.083535
110. Zhang Y, Shim EY, Davis M, Lee SE. Regulation of repair choice: Cdk1 suppresses recruitment of end joining factors at DNA breaks. DNA Repair (Amst) 2009; 8:1235-41; PMID:19699692; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2009.07.007
111. Bonetti D, Clerici M, Anbalagan S, Martina M, Lucchini G, Longhese MP. Shelterin-like proteins and Yku inhibit nucleolytic processing of Saccharomyces cerevisiae telomeres. PLoS Genet 2010; 6:e1000966; PMID:20523746; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal. pgen.1000966
112. Weinert TA, Hartwell LH. The RAD9 gene controls the cell cycle response to DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 1988; 241:317-22; PMID:3291120; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science. 3291120
113. Harrison JC, Haber JE. Surviving the breakup: The DNA damage checkpoint. Annu Rev Genet 2006; 40:209-35; PMID:16805667; http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/ annurev.genet.40.051206.105231 (Pubitemid 44956785)
114. Huyen Y, Zgheib O, Ditullio RA Jr., Gorgoulis VG, Zacharatos P, Petty TJ, et al. Methylated lysine 79 of histone H3 targets 53BP1 to DNA double-strand breaks. Nature 2004; 432:406-11; PMID:15525939; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ nature03114 (Pubitemid 39551676)
115. Hammet A, Magill C, Heierhorst J, Jackson SP. Rad9 BRCT domain interaction with phosphorylated H2AX regulates the G1 checkpoint in budding yeast. EMBO Rep 2007; 8:851-7; PMID:17721446; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj. embor.7401036 (Pubitemid 350001429)
116. Giannattasio M, Lazzaro F, Plevani P, Muzi-Falconi M. The DNA damage checkpoint response requires histone H2B ubiquitination by Rad6-Bre1 and H3 methylation by Dot1. J Biol Chem 2005; 280:9879-86; PMID:15632126; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc. M414453200 (Pubitemid 40395835)
117. Nnakwe CC, Altaf M, Côté J, Kron SJ. Dissection of Rad9 BRCT domain function in the mitotic checkpoint response to telomere uncapping. DNA Repair (Amst) 2009; 8:1452-61; PMID:19880356; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. dnarep.2009.09.010
118. Granata M, Lazzaro F, Novarina D, Panigada D, Puddu F, Abreu CM, et al. Dynamics of Rad9 chromatin binding and checkpoint function are mediated by its dimerization and are cell cycle-regulated by CDK1 activity. PLoS Genet 2010; 6:e1001047; PMID:20700441; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal. pgen.1001047
119. Pfander B, Diffley JFX. Dpb11 coordinates Mec1 kinase activation with cell cycle-regulated Rad9 recruitment. EMBO J 2011; 30:4897-907; PMID:21946560; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2011.345
120. Wang G, Tong X, Weng S, Zhou H. Multiple phosphorylation of Rad9 by CDK is required for DNA damage checkpoint activation. Cell Cycle 2012; 11:3792-800; PMID:23070520; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.21987
121. Lydall D, Weinert T. Yeast checkpoint genes in DNA damage processing: Implications for repair and arrest. Science 1995; 270:1488-91; PMID:7491494; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.270.5241.1488
122. Donnianni RA, Ferrari M, Lazzaro F, Clerici M, Tamilselvan Nachimuthu B, Plevani P, et al. Elevated levels of the polo kinase Cdc5 override the Mec1/ATR checkpoint in budding yeast by acting at different steps of the signaling pathway. PLoS Genet 2010; 6:e1000763; PMID:20098491; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pgen.1000763
123. FitzGerald JE, Grenon M, Lowndes NF. 53BP1: Function and mechanisms of focal recruitment. Biochem Soc Trans 2009; 37:897-904; PMID:19614615; http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BST0370897
124. Al-Hakim A, Escribano-Diaz C, Landry MC, O'Donnell L, Panier S, Szilard RK, et al. The ubiquitous role of ubiquitin in the DNA damage response. DNA Repair (Amst) 2010; 9:1229-40; PMID:21056014; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. dnarep.2010.09.011
125. Bekker-Jensen S, Mailand N. The ubiquitin-and SUMO-dependent signaling response to DNA double-strand breaks. FEBS Lett 2011; 585:2914-9; PMID:21664912; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet. 2011.05.056
126. Morales JC, Xia Z, Lu T, Aldrich MB, Wang B, Rosales C, et al. Role for the BRCA1 C-terminal repeats (BRCT) protein 53BP1 in maintaining genomic stability. J Biol Chem 2003; 278:14971-7; PMID:12578828; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1074/jbc. M212484200 (Pubitemid 36799828)
127. Ward IM, Reina-San-Martin B, Olaru A, Minn K, Tamada K, Lau JS, et al. 53BP1 is required for class switch recombination. J Cell Biol 2004; 165:459-64; PMID:15159415; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200403021 (Pubitemid 38679611)
128. Nakamura K, Sakai W, Kawamoto T, Bree RT, Lowndes NF, Takeda S, et al. Genetic dissection of vertebrate 53BP1: A major role in non-homologous end joining of DNA double strand breaks. DNA Repair (Amst) 2006; 5:741-9; PMID:16644291; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2006.03.008 (Pubitemid 43766521)
129. Redwood AB, Perkins SM, Vanderwaal RP, Feng Z, Biehl KJ, Gonzalez-Suarez I, et al. A dual role for A-type lamins in DNA double-strand break repair. Cell Cycle 2011; 10:2549-60; PMID:21701264; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.10.15.16531
130. Redwood AB, Gonzalez-Suarez I, Gonzalo S. Regulating the levels of key factors in cell cycle and DNA repair: New pathways revealed by lamins. Cell Cycle 2011; 10:3652-7; PMID:22045204; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.10.21.18201
131. Noon AT, Shibata A, Rief N, Löbrich M, Stewart GS, Jeggo PA, et al. 53BP1-dependent robust localized KAP-1 phosphorylation is essential for heterochromatic DNA double-strand break repair. Nat Cell Biol 2010; 12:177-84; PMID:20081839; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb2017
132. Dimitrova N, Chen YC, Spector DL, de Lange T. 53BP1 promotes non-homologous end joining of telomeres by increasing chromatin mobility. Nature 2008; 456:524-8; PMID:18931659; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature07433 (Pubitemid 50304845)
133. Manis JP, Morales JC, Xia Z, Kutok JL, Alt FW, Carpenter PB. 53BP1 links DNA damage-response pathways to immunoglobulin heavy chain classswitch recombination. Nat Immunol 2004; 5:481-7; PMID:15077110; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1038/ni1067 (Pubitemid 38660459)
134. Difilippantonio S, Gapud E, Wong N, Huang CY, Mahowald G, Chen HT, et al. 53BP1 facilitates long-range DNA end-joining during V(D)J recombination. Nature 2008; 456:529-33; PMID:18931658; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature07476 (Pubitemid 50304846)
135. Reina-San-Martin B, Chen J, Nussenzweig A, Nussenzweig MC. Enhanced intra-switch region recombination during immunoglobulin class switch recombination in 53BP1-/-B cells. Eur J Immunol 2007; 37:235-9; PMID:17183606; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eji.200636789 (Pubitemid 46128803)
136. Sfeir A, de Lange T. Removal of shelterin reveals the telomere end-protection problem. Science 2012; 336:593-7; PMID:22556254; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1218498
137. Bunting SF, Callén E, Wong N, Chen HT, Polato F, Gunn A, et al. 53BP1 inhibits homologous recombination in Brca1-deficient cells by blocking resection of DNA breaks. Cell 2010; 141:243-54; PMID:20362325; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.03.012
138. Bothmer A, Robbiani DF, Feldhahn N, Gazumyan A, Nussenzweig A,
139. Jankovic M, Feldhahn N, Oliveira TY, Silva IT, Kieffer-Kwon KR, Yamane A, et al. 53BP1 alters the landscape of DNA rearrangements and suppresses AID-induced B cell lymphoma. Mol Cell 2013; 49:623-31; PMID:23290917
140. Bothmer A, Robbiani DF, Di Virgilio M, Bunting SF, Klein IA, Feldhahn N, et al. Regulation of DNA end joining, resection, and immunoglobulin class switch recombination by 53BP1. Mol Cell 2011; 42:319-29; PMID:21549309; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2011.03.019
141. Lottersberger F, Bothmer A, Robbiani DF, Nussenzweig MC, de Lange T. Role of 53BP1 oligomerization in regulating double-strand break repair. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013; 110:2146-51; PMID:23345425; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas. 1222617110
142. Silverman J, Takai H, Buonomo SBC, Eisenhaber F, de Lange T. Human Rif1, ortholog of a yeast telomeric protein, is regulated by ATM and 53BP1 and functions in the S-phase checkpoint. Genes Dev 2004; 18:2108-19; PMID:15342490; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1216004 (Pubitemid 39166628)
143. Chapman JR, Barral P, Vannier JB, Borel V, Steger M, Tomas-Loba A, et al. RIF1 is essential for 53BP1-dependent nonhomologous end joining and suppression of DNA double-strand break resection. Mol Cell 2013; 49:858-71; PMID:23333305; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2013.01.002
144. Escribano-Díaz C, Orthwein A, Fradet-Turcotte A, Xing M, Young JT, Tkác J, et al. A cell cycle-dependent regulatory circuit composed of 53BP1-RIF1 and BRCA1-CtIP controls DNA repair pathway choice. Mol Cell 2013; 49:872-83; PMID:23333306; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2013.01.001
145. Di Virgilio M, Callen E, Yamane A, Zhang W, Jankovic M, Gitlin AD, et al. Rif1 prevents resection of DNA breaks and promotes immunoglobulin class switching. Science 2013; 339:711-5; PMID:23306439; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/ science. 1230624
146. Zimmermann M, Lottersberger F, Buonomo SB, Sfeir A, de Lange T. 53BP1 regulates DSB repair using Rif1 to control 5' end resection. Science 2013; 339:700-4; PMID:23306437; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1231573
147. Hakim O, Resch W, Yamane A, Klein I, Kieffer-Kwon KR, Jankovic M, et al. DNA damage defines sites of recurrent chromosomal translocations in B lymphocytes. Nature 2012; 484:69-74; PMID:22314321
148. Hayano M, Kanoh Y, Matsumoto S, Renard-Guillet C, Shirahige K, Masai H. Rif1 is a global regulator of timing of replication origin firing in fission yeast. Genes Dev 2012; 26:137-50; PMID:22279046; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad. 178491.111
149. Yamazaki S, Ishii A, Kanoh Y, Oda M, Nishito Y, Masai H. Rif1 regulates the replication timing domains on the human genome. EMBO J 2012; 31:3667-77; PMID:22850674; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2012.180
150. Cornacchia D, Dileep V, Quivy JP, Foti R, Tili F, Santarella-Mellwig R, et al. Mouse Rif1 is a key regulator of the replication-timing programme in mammalian cells. EMBO J 2012; 31:3678-90; PMID:22850673; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1038/emboj.2012.214
151. Chang M, Rothstein R. Rif1/2 and Tel1 function in separate pathways during replicative senescence. Cell Cycle 2011; 10:3798-9; PMID:22033189; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.10.21.18095
152. Xue Y, Rushton MD, Maringele L. A novel checkpoint and RPA inhibitory pathway regulated by Rif1. PLoS Genet 2011; 7:e1002417; PMID:22194703; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002417
153. Ribeyre C, Shore D. Anticheckpoint pathways at telomeres in yeast. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2012; 19:307-13; PMID:22343724; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb. 2225