Surviving the breakup: The DNA damage checkpoint

Annual Review of Genetics

Volumn 40, Issue , 2006, Pages 209-235

  Harrison, Jacob C ^a   Haber, James E ^a  

^a BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptation; DNA damage checkpoint; Double strand break; Mec1; Rad53; Recovery

Indexed keywords

ATM PROTEIN; ATR PROTEIN; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA;

CELL CYCLE ARREST; CHROMOSOME DAMAGE; CHROMOSOME MUTATION; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; DNA STRAND BREAKAGE; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; HUMAN; MITOSIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CHROMATIN; DNA BREAKS, DOUBLE-STRANDED; DNA REPAIR; DNA, SINGLE-STRANDED; GENES, CDC; HUMANS; MITOSIS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; SACCHAROMYCETALES; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES;

EID: 33751419716     PISSN: 00664197     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.genet.40.051206.105231     Document Type: Review

References (172)

1. Abraham RT. 2001. Cell cycle checkpoint signaling through the ATM and ATR kinases. Genes Dev. 15:2177-96
2. Agarwal R, Tang Z, Yu H, Cohen-Fix O. 2003. Two distinct pathways for inhibiting pds1 ubiquitination in response to DNA damage. J. Biol. Chem. 278:45027-33
3. Aylon Y, Kupiec M. 2003. The checkpoint protein Rad24 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is involved in processing double-strand break ends and in recombination partner choice. Mol. Cell Biol. 23:6585-96
4. Aylon Y, Liefshitz B, Kupiec M. 2004. The CDK regulates repair of double-strand breaks by homologous recombination during the cell cycle. EMBO J. 23:4868-75
5. Bailis JM, Roeder GS. 2000. Pachytene exit controlled by reversal of Mek1-dependent phosphorylation. Cell 101:211-21
6. Bakkenist CJ, Kastan MB. 2003. DNA damage activates ATM through intermolecular autophosphorylation and dimer dissociation. Nature 421:499-506
7. Ball HL, Myers JS, Cortez D. 2005. ATRIP binding to replication protein A-single-stranded DNA promotes ATR-ATRIP localization but is dispensable for Chk1 phosphorylation. Mol. Biol. Cell 16:2372-81
8. Baroni E, Viscardi V, Cartagena-Lirola H, Lucchini G, Longhese MP. 2004. The functions of budding yeast Sae2 in the DNA damage response require Mec1- and Tel1-dependent phosphorylation. Mol. Cell Biol. 24:4151-65
9. Bartkova J, Horejsi Z, Koed K, Kramer A, Tort F, et al. 2005. DNA damage response as a candidate anticancer barrier in early human tumorigenesis. Nature 434:864-70
10. Bashkirov VI, Bashkirova EV, Haghnazari E, Heyer WD. 2003. Direct kinase-to-kinase signaling mediated by the FHA phosphoprotein recognition domain of the Dun1 DNA damage checkpoint kinase. Mol. Cell Biol. 23:1441-52
11. Bermudez VP, Lindsey-Boltz LA, Cesare AJ, Maniwa Y, Griffith JD, et al. 2003. Loading of the human 9-1-1 checkpoint complex onto DNA by the checkpoint clamp loader hRad17-replication factor C complex in vitro. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:1633-38
12. Bird AW, Yu DY, Pray-Grant MG, Qiu Q, Harmon KE, et al. 2002. Acetylation of histone H4 by Esa1 is required for DNA double-strand break repair. Nature 419:411-15
13. Blankley RT, Lydall D. 2004. A domain of Rad9 specifically required for activation of Chk1 in budding yeast. J. Cell Sci. 117:601-8
14. Brown EJ, Baltimore D. 2000. ATR disruption leads to chromosomal fragmentation and early embryonic lethality. Genes Dev. 14:397-402
15. Cao L, Alani E, Kleckner N. 1990. A pathway for generation and processing of double-strand breaks during meiotic recombination in S. cerevisiae. Cell 61:1089-101
16. Carr AM. 2002. DNA structure dependent checkpoints as regulators of DNA repair. DNA Repair 1:983-94
17. Celeste A, Fernandez-Capetillo O, Kruhlak MJ, Pilch DR, Staudt DW, et al. 2003. Histone H2AX phosphorylation is dispensable for the initial recognition of DNA breaks. Nat. Cell Biol. 5:675-79
18. Celeste A, Petersen S, Romanienko PJ, Fernandez-Capetillo O, Chen HT, et al. 2002. Genomic instability in mice lacking histone H2AX. Science 296:922-27
19. Cheng L, Hunke L, Hardy CF. 1998. Cell cycle regulation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae polo-like kinase cdc5p. Mol. Cell Biol. 18:7360-70
20. Cheung WL, Turner FB, Krishnamoorthy T, Wolner B, Ahn SH, et al. 2005. Phosphorylation of histone H4 serine 1 during DNA damage requires casein kinase II in S. cerevisiae. Curr. Biol. 15:656-60
21. Chowdhury D, Keogh MC, Ishii H, Peterson CL, Buratowski S, Lieberman J. 2005. gamma-H2AX dephosphorylation by protein phosphatase 2A facilitates DNA double-strand break repair. Mol. Cell 20:801-9
22. Clarke DJ, Segal M, Andrews CA, Rudyak SG, Jensen S, et al. 2003. S-phase checkpoint controls mitosis via an APC-independent Cdc20p function. Nat. Cell Biol. 5:928-35
23. Clerici M, Mantiero D, Lucchini G, Longhese MP. 2005. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sae2 protein promotes resection and bridging of double strand break ends. J. Biol. Chem. 280:38631-38
24. Clerici M, Mantiero D, Lucchini G, Longhese MP. 2006. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sae2 protein negatively regulates DNA damage checkpoint signaling. EMBO Rep. 7:212-18
25. Cohen-Fix O, Koshland D. 1997. The anaphase inhibitor of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pds1p is a target of the DNA damage checkpoint pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:14361-66
26. Collura A, Blaisonneau J, Baldacci G, Francesconi S. 2005. The fission yeast Crb2/Chk1 pathway coordinates the DNA damage and spindle checkpoint in response to replication stress induced by topoisomerase I inhibitor. Mol. Cell Biol. 25:7889-99
27. Corda Y, Lee SE, Guillot S, Walther A, Sollier J, et al. 2005. Inactivation of Ku-mediated end joining suppresses mec1Delta lethality by depleting the ribonucleotide reductase inhibitor Sml1 through a pathway controlled by Tell kinase and the Mre11 complex. Mol. Cell Biol. 25:10652-64
28. Cuadrado M, Martinez-Pastor B, Murga M, Toledo LI, Gutierrez-Martinez P, et al. 2006. ATM regulates ATR chromatin loading in response to DNA double-strand breaks. J. Exp. Med. 203:297-303
29. de Bettignies G, Johnston LH. 2003. The mitotic exit network. Curr. Biol. 13:R301
30. de Klein A, Muijtjens M, van Os R, Verhoeven Y, Smit B, et al. 2000. Targeted disruption of the cell-cycle checkpoint gene ATR leads to early embryonic lethality in mice. Curr. Biol. 10:479-82
31. den Elzen N, Kosoy A, Christopoulos H, O'Connell MJ. 2004. Resisting arrest: recovery from checkpoint arrest through dephosphorylation of Chk1 by PP1. Cell Cycle 3:529-33
32. den Elzen NR, O'Connell MJ. 2004. Recovery from DNA damage checkpoint arrest by PP1-mediated inhibition of Chk1. EMBO J. 23:908-18
33. Desany BA, Alcasabas AA, Bachant JB, Elledge SJ. 1998. Recovery from DNA replicational stress is the essential function of the S-phase checkpoint pathway. Genes Dev. 12:2956-70
34. Diede SJ, Gottschling DE. 2001. Exonuclease activity is required for sequence addition and Cdc13p loading at a de novo telomere. Curr. Biol. 11:1336-40
35. Downs JA, Allard S, Jobin-Robitaille O, Javaheri A, Auger A, et al. 2004. Binding of chromatin-modifying activities to phosphorylated histone H2A at DNA damage sites. Mol. Cell 16:979-90
36. Downs JA, Lowndes NF, Jackson SP. 2000. A role for Saccharomyces cerevisiae histone H2A in DNA repair. Nature 408:1001-4
37. Du LL, Moser BA, Russell P. 2004. Homo-oligomerization is the essential function of the tandem BRCT domains in the checkpoint protein Crb2-7. Biol. Chem. 279:38409-14
38. Duncker BP, Shimada K, Tsai-Pflugfelder M, Pasero P, Gasser SM. 2002. An N-terminal domain of Dbf4p mediates interaction with both origin recognition complex (ORC) and Rad53p and can deregulate late origin firing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:16087-92
39. Durocher D, Taylor IA, Sarbassova D, Haire LF, Westcott SL, et al. 2000. The molecular basis of FHA domain: phosphopeptide binding specificity and implications for phospho-dependent signaling mechanisms. Mol. Cell 6:1169-82
40. Elledge SJ, Zhou Z, Allen JB, Nayas TA. 1993. DNA damage and cell cycle regulation of ribonucleotide reductase. BioEssays 15:333-39
41. Ellison V, Stillman B. 2003. Biochemical characterization of DNA damage checkpoint complexes: clamp loader and clamp complexes with specificity for 5′ recessed DNA. PLoS Biol. 1:E33
42. Emili A. 1998. MEC1-dependent phosphorylation of Rad9p in response to DNA damage. Mol. Cell 2:183-89
43. Falck J, Coates J, Jackson SP. 2005. Conserved modes of recruitment of ATM, ATR and DNA-PKcs to sites of DNA damage. Nature 434:605-11
44. Furuse M, Nagase Y, Tsubouchi H, Murakami-Murofushi K, Shibata T, Ohta K. 1998. Distinct roles of two separable in vitro activities of yeast Mre11 in mitotic and meiotic recombination. EMBO J. 17:6412-25
45. Furuya K, Poitelea M, Guo L, Caspari T, Carr AM. 2004. Chk1 activation requires Rad9 S/TQ-site phosphorylation to promote association with C-terminal BRCT domains of Rad4TOPBP1. Genes Dev. 18:1154-64
46. Galgoczy DJ, Toczyski DP. 2001. Checkpoint adaptation precedes spontaneous and damage-induced genomic instability in yeast. Mol. Cell Biol. 21:1710-18
47. Garber PM, Rine J. 2002. Overlapping roles of the spindle assembly and DNA damage checkpoints in the cell-cycle response to altered chromosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 161:521-34
48. Garber PM, Vidanes GM, Toczyski DP. 2005. Damage in transition. Trends Biochem. Sci. 30:63-66
49. Gardner R, Putnam CW, Weinert T. 1999. RAD53, DUN1 and PDS1 define two parallel G2/M checkpoint pathways in budding yeast. EMBO J. 18:3173-85
50. Garvik B, Carson M, Hartwell L. 1995. Single-stranded DNA arising at telomeres in cdc13 mutants may constitute a specific signal for the RAD9 checkpoint. Mol. Cell Biol. 15:6128-38
51. Gasch AP, Huang M, Metzner S, Botstein D, Elledge SJ, Brown PO. 2001. Genomic expression responses to DNA-damaging agents and the regulatory role of the yeast ATR homolog Mec1p. Mol. Biol. Cell 12:2987-3003
52. Geymonat M, Spanos A, Walker PA, Johnston LH, Sedgwick SG. 2003. In vitro regulation of budding yeast Bfa1/Bub2 GAP activity by Cdc5. J. Biol. Chem. 278:14591-94
53. Giannattasio M, Lazzaro F, Plevani P, Muzi-Falconi M. 2005. The DNA damage check-point response requires histone H2B ubiquitination by Rad6-Bre1 and H3 methylation by Dot1. J. Biol. Chem. 280:9879-86
54. Giannattasio M, Sommariva E, Vercillo R, Lippi-Boncambi F, Liberi G, et al. 2002. A dominant-negative MEC3 mutant uncovers new functions for the Rad17 complex and Tell. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:12997-3002
55. Gingras AC, Caballero M, Zarske M, Sanchez A, Hazbun TR, et al. 2005. A novel, evolutionarily conserved protein phosphatase complex involved in cisplatin sensitivity. Mol. Cell Proteomics 4:1725-40
56. Gorgoulis VG, Vassiliou LV, Karakaidos P, Zacharatos P, Kotsinas A, et al. 2005. Activation of the DNA damage checkpoint and genomic instability in human precancerous lesions. Nature 434:907-13
57. Grenon M, Gilbert C, Lowndes NF. 2001. Checkpoint activation in response to double-strand breaks requires the Mre11/Rad50/Xrs2 complex. Nat. Cell Biol. 3:844-47
58. Hochwagen A, Tham WH, Brar GA, Amon A. 2005. The FK506 binding protein Fpr3 counteracts protein phosphatase 1 to maintain meiotic recombination checkpoint activity. Cell 122:861-73
59. Hu F, Elledge SJ. 2002. Bub2 is a cell cycle regulated phospho-protein controlled by multiple checkpoints. Cell Cycle 1:351-55
60. Hu F, Wang Y, Liu D, Li Y, Qin J, Elledge SJ. 2001. Regulation of the Bub2/Bfa1 GAP complex by Cdc5 and cell cycle checkpoints. Cell 107:655-65
61. Huyen Y, Zgheib O, Ditullio RAJ, Gorgoulis VG, Zacharatos P, et al. 2004. Methylated lysine 79 of histone H3 targets 53BP1 to DNA double-strand breaks. Nature 432:406-11
62. Ira G, Pellicioli A, Balijja A, Wang X, Fiorani S, et al. 2004. DNA end resection, homologous recombination and DNA damage checkpoint activation require CDK1. Nature 431:1011-17
63. Ivanov EL, Sugawara N, White CI, Fabre F, Haber JE. 1994. Mutations in XRS2 and RAD50 delay but do not prevent mating-type switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell Biol. 14:3414-25
64. Jazayeri A, Falck J, Lukas C, Bartek J, Smith GC, et al. 2006. ATM- and cell cycle-dependent regulation of ATR in response to DNA double-strand breaks. Nat. Cell Biol. 8:37-45
65. Jelinsky SA, Samson LD. 1999. Global response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to an alkylating agent. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:1486-91
66. Jia X, Weinert T, Lydall D. 2004. Mec1 and Rad53 inhibit formation of single-stranded DNA at telomeres of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cdc13-1 mutants. Genetics 166:753-64
67. Kaye JA, Melo JA, Cheung SK, Vaze MB, Haber JE, Toczyski DP. 2004. DNA breaks promote genomic instability by impeding proper chromosome segregation. Curr. Biol. 14:2096-106
68. Keogh MC, Kim JA, Downey M, Fillingham J, Chowdhury D, et al. 2006. A phosphatase complex that dephosphorylates gammaH2AX regulates DNA damage checkpoint recovery. Nature 439:497-501
69. Kondo T, Wakayama T, Naiki T, Matsumoto K, Sugimoto K. 2001. Recruitment of Mec1 and Ddc1 checkpoint proteins to double-strand breaks through distinct mechanisms. Science 294:867-70
70. Kornbluth S, Smythe C, Newport JW. 1992. In vitro cell cycle arrest induced by using artificial DNA templates. Mol. Cell Biol. 12:3216-23
71. Krejci L, Van Komen S, Li Y, Villemain J, Reddy MS, et al. 2003. DNA helicase Srs2 disrupts the Rad51 presynaptic filament. Nature 423:305-9
72. Kumagai A, Lee J, Yoo HY, Dunphy WG. 2006. TopBP1 activates the ATR-ATRIP complex. Cell 124:943-55
73. Lee JH, Paull TT. 2005. ATM activation by DNA double-strand breaks through the Mrell-Rad50-Nbs1 complex. Science 308:551-54
74. Lee SE, Bressan DA, Petrini JH, Haber JE. 2002. Complementation between N-terminal Saccharomyces cerevisiae mre11 alleles in DNA repair and telomere length maintenance. DNA Repair 1:27-40
75. Lee SE, Moore JK, Holmes A, Umezu K, Kolodner RD, Haber JE. 1998. Saccharomyces Ku70, mre11/rad50 and RPA proteins regulate adaptation to G2/M arrest after DNA damage. Cell 94:399-09
76. Lee SE, Pellicioli A, Demeter J, Vaze MP, Gasch AP, et al. 2000. Arrest, adaptation, and recovery following a chromosome double-strand break in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 65:303-14
77. Lee SE, Pellicioli A, Malkova A, Foiani M, Haber JE. 2001. The Saccharomyces recombination protein Tid1p is required for adaptation from G2/M arrest induced by a double-strand break. Curr. Biol. 11:1053-57
78. Lee SE, Pellicioli A, Vaze MB, Sugawara N, Malkova A, et al. 2003. Yeast Rad52 and Rad51 recombination proteins define a second pathway of DNA damage assessment in response to a single double-strand break. Mol. Cell Biol. 23:8913-23
79. Lee SJ, Schwartz MF, Duong JK, Stern DF. 2003. Rad53 phosphorylation site clusters are important for Rad53 regulation and signaling. Mol. Cell Biol. 23:6300-14
80. Leroy C, Lee SE, Vaze MB, Ochsenbien F, Guerois R, et al. 2003. PP2C phosphatases Ptc2 and Ptc3 are required for DNA checkpoint inactivation after a double-strand break. Mol. Cell 11:827-35
81. Li L, Zou L. 2005. Sensing, signaling, and responding to DNA damage: organization of the checkpoint pathways in mammalian cells. J. Cell Biochem. 94:298-306
82. Lisby M, Barlow JH, Burgess RC, Rothstein R. 2004. Choreography of the DNA damage response: spatiotemporal relationships among checkpoint and repair proteins. Cell 118:699-713
83. Llorente B, Symington LS. 2004. The Mre11 nuclease is not required for 5′ to 3′ resection at multiple HO-induced double-strand breaks. Mol. Cell Biol. 24:9682-94
84. Lopes M, Cotta-Ramusino C, Pellicioli A, Liberi G, Plevani P, et al. 2001. The DNA replication checkpoint response stabilizes stalled replication forks. Nature 412:557-61
85. a. Lou Z, Minter-Dykhouse K, Franco S, Gostissa M, Rivera MA, et al. 2006. MDC1 maintains genomic stability by participating in the amplification of ATM-dependent DNA damage signals. Mol. Cell. 21:187-200
86. Lu X, Nannenga B, Donehower LA. 2005. PPM1D dephosphorylates Chk1 and p53 and abrogates cell cycle checkpoints. Genes Dev. 19:1162-74
87. Lucca C, Vanoli F, Cotta-Ramusino C, Pellicioli A, Liberi G, et al. 2004. Checkpoint-mediated control of replisome-fork association and signaling in response to replication pausing. Oncogene 23:1206-13
88. Lydall D, Weinert T. 1995. Yeast checkpoint genes in DNA damage processing: implications for repair and arrest. Science 270:1488-91
89. Majka J, Burgers PM. 2003. Yeast Rad17/Mec3/Ddc1: a sliding clamp for the DNA damage checkpoint. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:2249-54
90. Margolis SS, Walsh S, Weiser DC, Yoshida M, Shenolikar S, Kornbluth S. 2003. PP1 control of M phase entry exerted through 14-3-3-regulated Cdc25 dephosphorylation. EMBO J. 22:5734-45
91. Maringele L, Lydall D. 2002. EXO1-dependent single-stranded DNA at telomeres activates subsets of DNA damage and spindle checkpoint pathways in budding yeast yku70Delta mutants. Genes Dev. 16:1919-33
92. Masumoto H, Hawke D, Kobayashi R, Verreault A. 2005. A role for cell-cycle-regulated histone H3 lysine 56 acetylation in the DNA damage response. Nature 436:294-98
93. Matsumoto T. 1997. A fission yeast homolog of CDC20/p55CDC/Fizzy is required for recovery from DNA damage and genetically interacts with p34cdc2. Mol. Cell Biol. 17:742-50
94. McKee AH, Kleckner N. 1997. A general method for identifying recessive diploid-specific mutations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, its application to the isolation of mutants blocked at intermediate stages of meiotic prophase and characterization of a new gene SAE2. Genetics 146:797-816
95. Melo JA, Cohen J, Toczyski DP. 2001. Two checkpoint complexes are independently recruited to sites of DNA damage in vivo. Genes Dev. 15:2809-21
96. Mochida S, Esashi F, Aono N, Tamai K, O'Connell MJ, Yanagida M. 2004. Regulation of checkpoint kinases through dynamic interaction with Crb2. EMBO J. 23:418-28
97. Moreau S, Ferguson JR, Symington LS. 1999. The nuclease activity of Mre11 is required for meiosis but not for mating type switching, end joining, or telomere maintenance. Mol. Cell Biol. 19:556-66
98. Morrison AJ, Highland J, Krogan NJ, Arbel-Eden A, Greenblatt JF, et al. 2004. INO80 and gamma-H2AX interaction links ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling to DNA damage repair. Cell 119:767-75
99. Nairz K, Klein F. 1997. mre11S-a yeast mutation that blocks double-strand-break processing and permits nonhomologous synapsis in meiosis. Genes Dev. 11:2272-90
100. Nakada D, Hirano Y, Sugimoto K. 2004. Requirement of the Mre11 complex and exonuclease 1 for activation of the Mec1 signaling pathway. Mol. Cell Biol. 24:10016-25
101. Nakada D, Hirano Y, Tanaka Y, Sugimoto K. 2005. Role of the C terminus of Mec1 checkpoint kinase in its localization to sites of DNA damage. MoI. Biol. Cell 16:5227-35
102. Nakada D, Matsumoto K, Sugimoto K. 2003. ATM-related Tell associates with double-strand breaks through an Xrs2-dependent mechanism. Genes Dev. 17:1957-62
103. Nakamura TM, Du LL, Redon C, Russell P. 2004. Histone H2A phosphorylation controls Crb2 recruitment at DNA breaks, maintains checkpoint arrest, and influences DNA repair in fission yeast. Mol. Cell Biol. 24:6215-30
104. Nanduri J, Mitra S, Andrei C, Liu Y, Yu Y, et al. 1999. An unexpected link between the secretory path and the organization of the nucleus. J. Biol. Chem. 274:33785-89
105. Neale MJ, Pan J, Keeney S. 2005. Endonucleolytic processing of covalent protein-linked DNA double-strand breaks. Nature 436:1053-57
106. O'Connell MJ, Cimprich KA. 2005. G2 damage checkpoints: What is the turn-on? J. Cell Sci. 118:1-6
107. O'Neill T, Giarratani L, Chen P, Iyer L, Lee CH, et al. 2002. Determination of substrate motifs for human Chk1 and hCds1/Chk2 by the oriented peptide library approach. J. Biol. Chem. 277:16102-15
108. Paciotti V, Clerici M, Lucchini G, Longhese MP. 2000. The checkpoint protein Ddc2, functionally related to S. pombe Rad26, interacts with Mec1 and is regulated by Mec1-dependent phosphorylation in budding yeast. Genes Dev. 14:2046-59
109. Pan J, Chen RH. 2004. Spindle checkpoint regulates Cdc20p stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 18:1439-51
110. Paull TT, Gellert M. 1998. The 3′ to 5′ exonuclease activity of Mre11 facilitates repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Mol. Cell 1:969-79
111. Paull TT, Rogakou EP, Yamazaki V, Kirchgessner CU, Gellert M, Bonner WM. 2000. A critical role for histone H2AX in recruitment of repair factors to nuclear foci after DNA damage. Curr. Biol. 10:886-95
112. a. Pellicioli A, Foiani M. 2005. Signal transduction: how Rad53 is activated. Curr. Biol. 15:R769-71
113. Pellicioli A, Lee SE, Lucca C, Foiani M, Haber JE. 2001. Regulation of Saccharomyces Rad53 checkpoint kinase during adaptation from DNA damage-induced G2/M arrest. Mol. Cell 7:293-300
114. Pellicioli A, Lucca C, Liberi G, Marini F, Lopes M, et al. 1999. Activation of Rad53 kinase in response to DNA damage and its effect in modulating phosphorylation of the lagging strand DNA polymerase. EMBO J. 18:6561-72
115. Pike BL, Yongkiettrakul S, Tsai MD, Heierhorst J. 2003. Diverse but overlapping functions of the two forkhead-associated (FHA) domains in Rad53 checkpoint kinase activation. J. Biol. Chem. 278:30421-24
116. Prinz S, Amon A, Klein F. 1997. Isolation of COM1, a new gene required to complete meiotic double-strand break-induced recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 146:781-95
117. Rao PN, Johnson RT. 1970. Mammalian cell fusion: studies on the regulation of DNA synthesis and mitosis. Nature 225:159-64
118. Redon C, Pilch DR, Rogakou EP, Orr AH, Lowndes NF, Bonner WM. 2003. Yeast histone 2A serine 129 is essential for the efficient repair of checkpoint-blind DNA damage. EMBO Rep. 4:678-84
119. Rogakou EP, Boon C, Redon C, Bonner WM. 1999. Megabase chromatin domains involved in DNA double-strand breaks in vivo. J. Cell Biol. 146:905-16
120. Rouse J, Jackson SP. 2000. LCD1: an essential gene involved in checkpoint control and regulation of the MEC1 signaling pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 19:5801-12
121. Rouse J, Jackson SP. 2002. Lcd1p recruits Mec1p to DNA lesions in vitroa and in vivo. Mol. Cell 9:857-69
122. Sancar A, Lindsey-Boltz LA, Unsal-Kacmaz K, Linn S. 2004. Molecular mechanisms of mammalian DNA repair and the DNA damage checkpoints. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 73:39-85
123. Sanchez Y, Bachant J, Wang H, Hu F, Liu D, et al. 1999. Control of the DNA damage checkpoint by chk1 and rad53 protein kinases through distinct mechanisms. Science 286:1166-71
124. Sandell LL, Zakian VA. 1993. Loss of a yeast telomere: arrest, recovery, and chromosome loss. Cell 75:729-39
125. Sanders SL, Portoso M, Mata J, Bahler J, Allshire RC, Kouzarides T. 2004. Methylation of histone H4 lysine 20 controls recruitment of Crb2 to sites of DNA damage. Cell 119:603-14
126. Schwartz MF, Duong JK, Sun Z, Morrow JS, Pradhan D, Stern DF. 2002. Rad9 phosphorylation sites couple Rad53 to the Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA damage checkpoint. Mol. Cell 9:1055-65
127. Schwartz MF, Lee SJ, Duong JK, Eminaga S, Stern DF. 2003. FHA domain-mediated DNA checkpoint regulation of Rad53. Cell Cycle 2:384-96
128. Searle JS, Schollaert KL, Wilkins BJ, Sanchez Y. 2004. The DNA damage checkpoint and PKA pathways converge on APC substrates and Cdc20 to regulate mitotic progression. Nat. Cell Biol. 6:138-45
129. Shiloh Y. 2003. ATM and related protein kinases: safeguarding genome integrity. Nat. Rev. Cancer 3:155-68
130. Shroff R, Arbel-Eden A, Pilch D, Ira G, Bonner WM, et al. 2004. Distribution and dynamics of chromatin modification induced by a defined DNA double-strand break. Curr. Biol. 14:1703-11
131. Smits VA, Klompmaker R, Arnaud L, Rijksen G, Nigg EA, Medema RH. 2000. Polo-like kinase-1 is a target of the DNA damage checkpoint. Nat. Cell Biol. 2:672-76
132. Smits VA, Reaper PM, Jackson SP. 2006. Rapid PIKK-dependent release of Chk1 from chromatin promotes the DNA-damage checkpoint response. Curr. Biol. 16:150-59
133. Smolka MB, Albuquerque CP, Chen SH, Schmidt KH, Wei XX, et al. 2005. Dynamic changes in protein-protein interaction and protein phosphorylation probed with amine-reactive isotope tag. Mol. Cell Proteom. 4:1358-69
134. Sogo JM, Lopes M, Foiani M. 2002. Fork reversal and ssDNA accumulation at stalled replication forks owing to checkpoint defects. Science 297:599-602
135. Sonoda E, Sasaki MS, Buerstedde JM, Bezzubova O, Shinohara A, et al. 1998. Rad51-deficient vertebrate cells accumulate chromosomal breaks prior to cell death. EMBO J. 17:598-608
136. Soulier J, Lowndes NF. 1999. The BRCT domain of the S. cerevisiae checkpoint protein Rad9 mediates a Rad9-Rad9 interaction after DNA damage. Curr. Biol. 9:551-54
137. Strom L, Lindroos HB, Shirahige K, Sjogren C. 2004. Postreplicative recruitment of cohesin to double-strand breaks is required for DNA repair. Mol. Cell 16:1003-15
138. a. Stucki M, Clapperton JA, Mohammad D, Yaffe MB, Smerdon SJ, Jackson SP. 2005. MDC1 directly binds phosphorylated histone H2AX to regulate cellular responses to DNA double-strand breaks. Cell 123:1213-26
139. Sun Z, Hsiao J, Fay DS, Stern DF. 1998. Rad53 FHA domain associated with phosphorylated Rad9 in the DNA damage checkpoint. Science 281:272-74
140. Sweeney FD, Yang F, Chi A, Shabanowitz J, Hunt DF, Durocher D. 2005. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad9 acts as a Mec1 adaptor to allow Rad53 activation. Curr. Biol. 15:1364-75
141. Tercero JA, Diffley JF. 2001. Regulation of DNA replication fork progression through damaged DNA by the Mec1/Rad53 checkpoint. Nature 412:553-57
142. Toczyski DP, Galgoczy DJ, Hartwell LH. 1997. CDC5 and CKII control adaptation to the yeast DNA damage checkpoint. Cell 90:1097-106
143. Tomita K, Matsuura A, Caspari T, Carr AM, Akamatsu Y, et al. 2003. Competition between the Rad50 complex and the Ku heterodimer reveals a role for Exo1 in processing double-strand breaks but not telomeres. Mol. Cell Biol. 23:5186-97
144. Trujillo KM, Yuan SS, Lee EY, Sung P. 1998. Nuclease activities in a complex of human recombination and DNA repair factors Rad50, Mre11, and p95. J. Biol. Chem. 273:21447-50
145. Tsubouchi H, Ogawa H. 1998. A novel mre11 mutation impairs processing of double-strand breaks of DNA during both mitosis and meiosis. Mol. Cell Biol. 18:260-68
146. Tsukuda T, Fleming AB, Nickoloff JA, Osley MA. 2005. Chromatin remodelling at a DNA double-strand break site in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 438:379-83
147. Ubersax JA, Woodbury EL, Quang PN, Paraz M, Blethrow JD, et al. 2003. Targets of the cyclin-dependent kinase Cdk1. Nature 425:859-64
148. Unal E, Arbel-Eden A, Sattler U, Shroff R, Lichten M, et al. 2004. DNA damage response pathway uses histone modification to assemble a double-strand break-specific cohesin domain. Mol. Cell 16:991-1002
149. Usui T, Ogawa H, Petrini JH. 2001. A DNA damage response pathway controlled by Tel1 and the Mre11 complex. Mol. Cell 7:1255-66
150. van Attikum H, Fritsch O, Hohn B, Gasser SM. 2004. Recruitment of the INO80 complex by H2A phosphorylation links ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling with DNA double-strand break repair. Cell 119:777-88
151. van Leeuwen F, Gafken PR, Gottschling DE. 2002. Dot1p modulates silencing in yeast by methylation of the nucleosome core. Cell 109:745-56
152. van Vugt MA, Bras A, Medema RH. 2004. Polo-like kinase-1 controls recovery from a G2 DNA damage-induced arrest in mammalian cells. Mol. Cell 15:799-811
153. Vaze MB, Pellicioli A, Lee SE, Ira G, Liberi G, et al. 2002. Recovery from checkpoint-mediated arrest after repair of a double-strand break requires Srs2 helicase. Mol. Cell 10:373-85
154. Veaute X, Jeusset J, Soustelle C, Kowalczykowski SC, Le Cam E, Fabre F. 2003. The Srs2 helicase prevents recombination by disrupting Rad51 nucleoprotein filaments. Nature 423:309-12
155. Venclovas C, Thelen MP. 2000. Structure-based predictions of Rad1, Rad9, Hus1 and Rad17 participation in sliding clamp and clamp-loading complexes. Nucleic Acids Res. 28:2481-93
156. Wakayama T, Kondo T, Ando S, Matsumoto K, Sugimoto K. 2001. Pie1, a protein interacting with Mec1, controls cell growth and checkpoint responses in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell Biol. 21:755-64
157. Wang H, Liu D, Wang Y, Qin J, Elledge SJ. 2001. Pds1 phosphorylation in response to DNA damage is essential for its DNA damage checkpoint function. Genes Dev. 15:1361-72
158. Ward I, Chen J. 2004. Early events in the DNA damage response. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 63:1-35
159. Weinert TA, Hartwell LH. 1988. The RAD9 gene controls the cell cycle response to DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 241:317-22
160. White CI, Haber JE. 1990. Intermediates of recombination during mating type switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 9:663-73
161. Wysocki R, Javaheri A, Allard S, Sha F, Cote J, Kron SJ. 2005. Role of Dot1-dependent histone H3 methylation in G1 and S phase DNA damage checkpoint functions of Rad9. Mol. Cell Biol. 25:8430-43
162. Yamamoto A, Guacci V, Koshland D. 1996. Pds1p, an inhibitor of anaphase in budding yeast, plays a critical role in the APC and checkpoint pathway(s). J. Cell Biol. 133:99-110
163. Yan S, Lindsay HD, Michael WM. 2006. Direct requirement for Xmus101 in ATR-mediated phosphorylation of Claspin bound Chk1 during checkpoint signaling. J. Cell Biol. 173:181-86
164. Yoo HY, Kumagai A, Shevchenko A, Dunphy WG. 2004. Adaptation of a DNA replication checkpoint response depends upon inactivation of Claspin by the Polo-like kinase. Cell 117:575-88
165. You Z, Chahwan C, Bailis J, Hunter T, Russell P. 2005. ATM activation and its recruitment to damaged DNA require binding to the C terminus of Nbs1. Mol. Cell Biol. 25:5363-79
166. Zhao X, Chabes A, Domkin V, Thelander L, Rothstein R. 2001. The ribonucleotide reductase inhibitor Sml1 is a new target of the Mec1/Rad53 kinase cascade during growth and in response to DNA damage. EMBO J. 20:3544-53
167. Zhao X, Muller EG, Rothstein R. 1998. A suppressor of two essential checkpoint genes identifies a novel protein that negatively affects dNTP pools. Mol. Cell 2:329-40
168. Zhao X, Rothstein R. 2002. The Dun1 checkpoint kinase phosphorylates and regulates the ribonucleotide reductase inhibitor Sml1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:3746-51
169. Zou L, Cortez D, Elledge SJ. 2002. Regulation of ATR substrate selection by Rad 17-dependent loading of Rad9 complexes onto chromatin. Genes Dev. 16:198-208
170. Zou L, Elledge SJ. 2003. Sensing DNA damage through ATRIP recognition of RPA-ssDNA complexes. Science 300:1542-48
171. Zou L, Liu D, Elledge SJ. 2003. Replication protein A-mediated recruitment and activation of Rad17 complexes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:13827-32
172. Zubko MK, Guillard S, Lydall D. 2004. Exo1 and Rad24 differentially regulate generation of ssDNA at telomeres of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cdc13-1 mutants. Genetics 168:103-15