The yeast Fun30 and human SMARCAD1 chromatin remodellers promote DNA end resection

Nature

Volumn 489, Issue 7417, 2012, Pages 581-584

  Costelloe, Thomas ^a   Louge, Raphaël ^b   Tomimatsu, Nozomi ^c   Mukherjee, Bipasha ^c   Martini, Emmanuelle ^d   Khadaroo, Basheer ^b   Dubois, Kenny ^b   Wiegant, Wouter W ^a   Thierry, Agnès ^e   Burma, Sandeep ^c   Van Attikum, Haico ^a   Llorente, Bertrand ^b  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b CNRS   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d INSTITUT DE RADIOBIOLOGIE CELLULAIRE ET MOLÉCULAIRE   (France)

^e INSTITUT PASTEUR   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; CAMPTOTHECIN; FUNGAL PROTEIN; POLY(ADENOSINE DIPHOSPHATE RIBOSE); PROTEIN; PROTEIN FUN30; PROTEIN SMARCAD1; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

BIOCHEMISTRY; CYTOLOGY; DNA; ENZYME ACTIVITY; GENE EXPRESSION; GENOMICS; HOMINID; HOMOLOGY; INHIBITOR; PHYSIOLOGY; PROTEIN; YEAST;

ARTICLE; CHROMATIN; CHROMATIN ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ENZYME KINETICS; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; HUMAN; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FUNCTION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; YEAST;

CAMPTOTHECIN; CELL LINE; CELL SURVIVAL; CHROMATIN ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY; DNA; DNA BREAKS, DOUBLE-STRANDED; DNA HELICASES; DNA REPAIR; EXODEOXYRIBONUCLEASES; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; HISTONES; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; HUMANS; MUTATION; NUCLEOSOMES; POLY(ADP-RIBOSE) POLYMERASES; RECQ HELICASES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 84866898711     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature11353     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Mimitou, E. P. & Symington, L. S. Sae2, Exo1 and Sgs1 collaborate in DNA double-strand break processing. Nature 455, 770-774 (2008).
2. Zhu, Z., Chung, W. H. Shim E. Y., Lee, S. E. & Ira, G. Sgs1 helicase and two nucleases Dna2 and Exo1 resect DNA double-strand break ends. Cell 134, 981-994 (2008).
3. Gravel, S., Chapman, J. R., Magill, C. & Jackson, S. P. DNA helicases Sgs1 and BLM promote DNA double-strand break resection. Genes Dev. 22, 2767-2772 (2008).
4. Cejka, P. et al. DNA end resectionbyDna2-Sgs1-RPA and its stimulation by Top3-Rmi1 and Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2. Nature 467, 112-116 (2010).
5. Nicolette, M. L. et al. Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 and Sae2 promote59strand resection of DNA double-strand breaks. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 17, 1478-1485 (2010).
6. Niu, H. et al. Mechanism of the ATP-dependent DNA end-resection machinery from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 467, 108-111 (2010).
7. Sinha, M. & Peterson, C. L. Chromatin dynamics during repair of chromosomal DNA double-strand breaks. Epigenomics 1, 371-385 (2009).
8. Awad, S., Ryan, D., Prochasson, P., Owen-Hughes, T. & Hassan, A. H. The Snf2 homolog Fun30 acts as a homodimeric ATP-dependent chromatin-remodeling enzyme. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 9477-9484 (2010).
9. Neves-Costa, A., Will, W. R., Vetter, A. T., Miller, J. R. & Varga-Weisz, P. The SNF2-familymember Fun30promotes genesilencing inheterochromatic loci. PLoS ONE 4, e8111 (2009).
10. Ouspenski, I. I., Elledge, S. J. & Brinkley, B. R. New yeast genes important for chromosome integrity and segregation identified by dosage effects on genome stability. Nucleic Acids Res. 27, 3001-3008 (1999).
11. Marrero, V. A. & Symington, L. S. Extensive DNA end processingbyExo1 and Sgs1 inhibits break-induced replication. PLoS Genet. 6, e1001007 (2010).
12. White, C. I. & Haber, J. E. Intermediates of recombination during mating type switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 9, 663-673 (1990).
13. Shim, E. Y. et al. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mre11/Rad50/Xrs2 and Ku proteins regulate association ofExo1 and Dna2 with DNA breaks. EMBOJ. 29, 3370-3380 (2010).
14. Chen, C. C. et al. Acetylated lysine 56 on histone H3 drives chromatin assembly after repair and signals for the completion of repair. Cell 134, 231-243 (2008).
15. Clerici, M., Mantiero, D., Lucchini, G. & Longhese, M. P. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sae2 protein negatively regulates DNA damage checkpoint signalling. EMBO Rep. 7, 212-218 (2006).
16. Zubko, M. K. Exo1 and Rad24 differentially regulate generation of ssDNA at telomeresof Saccharomyces cerevisiae cdc13-1 mutants. Genetics168, 103-115 (2004).
17. Grandin, N. & Charbonneau, M. Control of the yeast telomeric senescence survival pathways of recombination by the Mec1and Mec3 DNA damagesensors and RPA. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, 822-838 (2007).
18. Garvik, B., Carson, M. & Hartwell, L. Single-stranded DNA arising at telomeres in cdc13 mutants may constitute a specific signal for the RAD9 checkpoint. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 6128-6138 (1995).
19. Matsuoka, S. et al. ATM and ATR substrate analysis reveals extensive protein networks responsive to DNA damage. Science 316, 1160-1166 (2007).
20. Beli, P. et al. Proteomic investigations reveal a role for RNA processing factor THRAP3 in the DNA damage response. Mol. Cell 46, 212-225 (2012).
21. Tomimatsu, N. et al. Exo1 playsa major role in DNA end resection inhumans and influences double-strand break repair and damage signaling decisions. DNA Repair 11, 441-448 (2012).
22. Bolderson, E. et al. Phosphorylation of Exo1 modulates homologous recombination repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, 1821-1831 (2010).
23. Stra°lfors, A., Walfridsson, J., Bhuiyan, H. & Ekwall, K. The FUN30 chromatin remodeler, Fft3, protects centromeric and subtelomeric domains from euchromatin formation. PLoS Genet. 7, e1001334 (2011).
24. Rowbotham, S. P. et al. Maintenance of silent chromatin through replication requires SWI/SNF-like chromatin remodeler SMARCAD1. Mol. Cell 42, 285-296 (2011).
25. Ooi, S. L., Shoemaker, D. D. & Boeke, J. D. DNAmicroarray-based genetic screen for nonhomologous end-joining mutants in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 294, 2552-2556 (2001).
26. Bärtsch, S., Kang, L. E. & Symington, L. S. RAD51 is required for the repair of plasmid double-stranded DNA gaps from either plasmid or chromosomal templates. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20, 1194-1205 (2000).
27. van Attikum, H., Fritsch, O. & Gasser, S. M. Distinct roles for SWR1 and INO80 chromatinremodeling complexesatchromosomaldouble-strandbreaks. EMBOJ. 26, 4113-4125 (2007).
28. Tomimatsu, N., Mukherjee, B. & Burma, S. Distinct roles of ATR and DNA-PKcs in triggering DNA damageresponsesinATM-deficient cells. EMBORep. 10, 629-635 (2009).
29. Shanbhag, N. M., Rafalska-Metcalf, I. U., Balane-Bolivar, C., Janicki, S. M. & Greenberg, R. A. ATM-dependentchromatin changes silence transcriptionincis to DNA double-strand breaks. Cell 141, 970-981 (2010).
30. Janke, C. et al. A versatile toolbox for PCR-based tagging of yeast genes: new fluorescent proteins, more markers and promoter substitution cassettes. Yeast 21, 947-962 (2004).
31. Pardo, B., Ma, E. & Marcand, S. Mismatch tolerance by DNA polymerase Pol4 in the courseofnonhomologous end joining in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 172, 2689-2694 (2006).
32. Moreau, S., Morgan, E. A. & Symington, L. S. Overlapping functions of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mre11, Exo1 and Rad27 nucleases in DNA metabolism. Genetics 159, 1423-1433 (2001).
33. Burke, D. & Strathern, J. in Methods in Yeast Genetics: a Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Course Manual (eds Amberg, D. C., Burke, D. & Strathern, J. N.) (2005).
34. Herskowitz, I. & Jensen, R. E. Putting the HO gene to work: practical uses for mating-type switching. Methods Enzymol. 194, 132-146 (1991).
35. Decourty, L. et al. Linking functionally related genes bysensitive and quantitative characterization of genetic interaction profiles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 5821-5826 (2008).
36. Martini, E. M. D., Keeney, S. & Osley, M. A. A role for histone H2B during repair of UV-induced DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 160, 1375-1387 (2002).
37. Bekker-Jensen, S. et al. Spatial organization of the mammalian genome surveillance machinery in response to DNA strand breaks. J. Cell Biol. 173, 195-206 (2006).
38. Sporbert, A., Gahl, A., Ankerhold, R., Leonhardt, H. & Cardoso, M. C. DNA polymerase clamp shows little turnover at established replication sites but sequentialdenovoassemblyatadjacentoriginclusters. Mol. Cell10, 1355-1365 (2002).