Nucleosome remodelers in double-strand break repair

Current Opinion in Genetics and Development

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 174-184

  Seeber, Andrew ^a,b   Hauer, Michael ^a,c   Gasser, Susan M ^a,b  

^a FRIEDRICH MIESCHER INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; HISTONE; INO80 PROTEIN; NUCLEOSOME REMODELER; RAD51 PROTEIN; RAD54 PROTEIN; SINGLE STRANDED DNA; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

DNA REPAIR; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; HUMAN; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOSOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION;

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; CHROMATIN ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY; DNA BREAKS, DOUBLE-STRANDED; DNA REPAIR; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; HISTONES; NUCLEOSOMES; PHOSPHORYLATION; RAD51 RECOMBINASE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 84877801676     PISSN: 0959437X     EISSN: 18790380     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gde.2012.12.008     Document Type: Review

References (67)

1. Neumann F.R., Dion V., Gehlen L.R., Tsai-Pflugfelder M., Schmid R., Taddei A., Gasser S.M. Targeted INO80 enhances subnuclear chromatin movement and ectopic homologous recombination. Genes Dev 2012, 26:369-383.
2. Chen X., Cui D., Papusha A., Zhang X., Chu C.D., Tang J., Chen K., Pan X., Ira G. The Fun30 nucleosome remodeller promotes resection of DNA double-strand break ends. Nature 2012, 489:576-580.
3. Soria G., Polo Sophie E., Almouzni G. Prime, repair, restore: the active role of chromatin in the DNA damage response. Mol Cell 2012, 46:722-734.
4. Flaus A., Martin D.M., Barton G.J., Owen-Hughes T. Identification of multiple distinct Snf2 subfamilies with conserved structural motifs. Nucleic Acids Res 2006, 34:2887-2905.
5. Clapier C.R., Cairns B.R. The biology of chromatin remodeling complexes. Annu Rev Biochem 2009, 78:273-304.
6. Chambers A.L., Downs J.A. The RSC and INO80 chromatin-remodeling complexes in DNA double-strand break repair. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci 2012, 110:229-261.
7. van Attikum H., Fritsch O., Hohn B., Gasser S.M. Recruitment of the INO80 complex by H2A phosphorylation links ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling with DNA double-strand break repair. Cell 2004, 119:777-788.
8. Morrison A.J., Highland J., Krogan N.J., Arbel-Eden A., Greenblatt J.F., Haber J.E., Shen X. INO80 and γ-H2AX interaction links ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling to DNA damage repair. Cell 2004, 119:767-775.
9. Downs J.A., Allard S., Jobin-Robitaille O., Javaheri A., Auger A., Bouchard N., Kron S.J., Jackson S.P., Cote J. Binding of chromatin-modifying activities to phosphorylated histone H2A at DNA damage sites. Mol Cell 2004, 16:979-990.
10. Kashiwaba S., Kitahashi K., Watanabe T., Onoda F., Ohtsu M., Murakami Y. The mammalian INO80 complex is recruited to DNA damage sites in an ARP8 dependent manner. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2010, 402:619-625.
11. Kitayama K., Kamo M., Oma Y., Matsuda R., Uchida T., Ikura T., Tashiro S., Ohyama T., Winsor B., Harata M. The human actin-related protein hArp5: nucleo-cytoplasmic shuttling and involvement in DNA repair. Exp Cell Res 2009, 315:206-217.
12. Kandasamy M.K., McKinney E.C., Deal R.B., Smith A.P., Meagher R.B. Arabidopsis actin-related protein ARP5 in multicellular development and DNA repair. Dev Biol 2009, 335:22-32.
13. Luk E., Ranjan A., Fitzgerald P.C., Mizuguchi G., Huang Y., Wei D., Wu C. Stepwise histone replacement by SWR1 requires dual activation with histone H2A.Z and canonical nucleosome. Cell 2010, 143:725-736.
14. Bao Y.H. Chromatin response to DNA double-strand break damage. Epigenomics 2011, 3:307-321.
15. Kalocsay M., Hiller N.J., Jentsch S. Chromosome-wide Rad51 spreading and SUMO-H2A.Z-dependent chromosome fixation in response to a persistent DNA double-strand break. Mol Cell 2009, 33:335-343.
16. Morillo-Huesca M., Clemente-Ruiz M., Andujar E., Prado F. The SWR1 histone replacement complex causes genetic instability and genome-wide transcription misregulation in the absence of H2A.Z. PLoS ONE 2010, 5:e12143.
17. Xu Y., Ayrapetov M.K., Xu C., Gursoy-Yuzugullu O., Hu Y., Price B.D. Histone H2A.Z controls a critical chromatin remodeling step required for DNA double-strand break repair. Mol Cell 2012, 48:723-733.
18. Chai B., Huang J., Cairns B.R., Laurent B.C. Distinct roles for the RSC and Swi/Snf ATP-dependent chromatin remodelers in DNA double-strand break repair. Genes Dev 2005, 19:1656-1661.
19. Shen X., Mizuguchi G., Hamiche A., Wu C. A chromatin remodelling complex involved in transcription and DNA processing. Nature 2000, 406:541-544.
20. Sinha M., Watanabe S., Johnson A., Moazed D., Peterson C.L. Recombinational repair within heterochromatin requires ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling. Cell 2009, 138:1109-1121.
21. Lee H.S., Park J.H., Kim S.J., Kwon S.J., Kwon J. A cooperative activation loop among SWI/SNF, gamma-H2AX and H3 acetylation for DNA double-strand break repair. EMBO J 2010, 29:1434-1445.
22. Ogiwara H., Ui A., Otsuka A., Satoh H., Yokomi I., Nakajima S., Yasui A., Yokota J., Kohno T. Histone acetylation by CBP and p300 at double-strand break sites facilitates SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling and the recruitment of non-homologous end joining factors. Oncogene 2011, 30:2135-2146.
23. Peng G., Yim E.K., Dai H., Jackson A.P., Burgt I., Pan M.R., Hu R., Li K., Lin S.Y. BRIT1/MCPH1 links chromatin remodelling to DNA damage response. Nat Cell Biol 2009, 11:865-872.
24. Hauk G., McKnight J.N., Nodelman I.M., Bowman G.D. The chromodomains of the Chd1 chromatin remodeler regulate DNA access to the ATPase motor. Mol Cell 2010, 39:711-723.
25. Smeenk G., Wiegant W.W., Vrolijk H., Solari A.P., Pastink A., van Attikum H. The NuRD chromatin-remodeling complex regulates signaling and repair of DNA damage. J Cell Biol 2010, 190:741-749.
26. Polo S.E., Kaidi A., Baskcomb L., Galanty Y., Jackson S.P. Regulation of DNA-damage responses and cell-cycle progression by the chromatin remodelling factor CHD4. EMBO J 2010, 29:3130-3139.
27. Chou D.M., Adamson B., Dephoure N.E., Tan X., Nottke A.C., Hurov K.E., Gygi S.P., Colaiacovo M.P., Elledge S.J. A chromatin localization screen reveals poly (ADP ribose)-regulated recruitment of the repressive polycomb and NuRD complexes to sites of DNA damage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010, 107:18475-18480.
28. Ahel D., Horejsi Z., Wiechens N., Polo S.E., Garcia-Wilson E., Ahel I., Flynn H., Skehel M., West S.C., Jackson S.P., et al. Poly(ADP-ribose)-dependent regulation of DNA repair by the chromatin remodeling enzyme ALC1. Science 2009, 325:1240-1243.
29. Ahel I., Ahel D., Matsusaka T., Clark A.J., Pines J., Boulton S.J., West S.C. Poly(ADP-ribose)-binding zinc finger motifs in DNA repair/checkpoint proteins. Nature 2008, 451:81-85.
30. Gottschalk A.J., Timinszky G., Kong S.E., Jin J., Cai Y., Swanson S.K., Washburn M.P., Florens L., Ladurner A.G., Conaway J.W., et al. Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation directs recruitment and activation of an ATP-dependent chromatin remodeler. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009, 106:13770-13774.
31. Goodarzi A.A., Kurka T., Jeggo P.A. KAP-1 phosphorylation regulates CHD3 nucleosome remodeling during the DNA double-strand break response. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2011, 18:831-839.
32. Goodarzi A.A., Noon A.T., Deckbar D., Ziv Y., Shiloh Y., Lobrich M., Jeggo P.A. ATM signaling facilitates repair of DNA double-strand breaks associated with heterochromatin. Mol Cell 2008, 31:167-177.
33. Denslow S.A., Wade P.A. The human Mi-2//NuRD complex and gene regulation. Oncogene 2007, 26:5433-5438.
34. Shim E.Y., Hong S.J., Oum J.H., Yanez Y., Zhang Y., Lee S.E. RSC mobilizes nucleosomes to improve accessibility of repair machinery to the damaged chromatin. Mol Cell Biol 2007, 27:1602-1613.
35. Gospodinov A., Vaissiere T., Krastev D.B., Legube G., Anachkova B., Herceg Z. Mammalian Ino80 mediates double-strand break repair through its role in DNA end strand resection. Mol Cell Biol 2011, 31:4735-4745.
36. van Attikum H., Fritsch O., Gasser S.M. Distinct roles for SWR1 and INO80 chromatin remodeling complexes at chromosomal double-strand breaks. EMBO J 2007, 26:4113-4125.
37. Papin C., Humbert O., Kalashnikova A., Eckert K., Morera S., Kas E., Grigoriev M. 3'- to 5' DNA unwinding by TIP49b proteins. FEBS J 2010, 277:2705-2714.
38. Awad S., Ryan D., Prochasson P., Owen-Hughes T., Hassan A.H. The Snf2 homolog Fun30 acts as a homodimeric ATP-dependent chromatin-remodeling enzyme. J Biol Chem 2010, 285:9477-9484.
39. Eapen V.V., Sugawara N., Tsabar M., Wu W.H., Haber J.E. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromatin remodeler Fun30 regulates DNA end-resection and checkpoint deactivation. Mol Cell Biol 2012, 32:4727-4740.
40. Durand-Dubief M., Will W.R., Petrini E., Theodorou D., Harris R.R., Crawford M.R., Paszkiewicz K., Krueger F., Correra R.M., Vetter A.T., et al. SWI/SNF-like chromatin remodeling factor Fun30 supports point centromere function in S. cerevisiae. PLoS Genet 2012, 8:e1002974.
41. Stralfors A., Walfridsson J., Bhuiyan H., Ekwall K. The FUN30 chromatin remodeler, Fft3, protects centromeric and subtelomeric domains from euchromatin formation. PLoS Genet 2011, 7:e1001334.
42. Costelloe T., Louge R., Tomimatsu N., Mukherjee B., Martini E., Khadaroo B., Dubois K., Wiegant W.W., Thierry A., Burma S., et al. The yeast Fun30 and human SMARCAD1 chromatin remodellers promote DNA end resection. Nature 2012, 489:581-584.
43. Lazzaro F., Sapountzi V., Granata M., Pellicioli A., Vaze M., Haber J.E., Plevani P., Lydall D., Muzi-Falconi M. Histone methyltransferase Dot1 and Rad9 inhibit single-stranded DNA accumulation at DSBs and uncapped telomeres. EMBO J 2008, 27:1502-1512.
44. Lydall D., Weinert T. Yeast checkpoint genes in DNA damage processing: implications for repair and arrest. Science 1995, 270:1488-1491.
45. Gospodinov A., Tsaneva I., Anachkova B. RAD51 foci formation in response to DNA damage is modulated by TIP49. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2009, 41:925-933.
46. Murr R., Loizou J.I., Yang Y.G., Cuenin C., Li H., Wang Z.Q., Herceg Z. Histone acetylation by Trrap-Tip60 modulates loading of repair proteins and repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Nat Cell Biol 2006, 8:91-99.
47. Tsukuda T., Fleming A.B., Nickoloff J.A., Osley M.A. Chromatin remodelling at a DNA double-strand break site in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 2005, 438:379-383.
48. Tsukuda T., Lo Y.C., Krishna S., Sterk R., Osley M.A., Nickoloff J.A. INO80-dependent chromatin remodeling regulates early and late stages of mitotic homologous recombination. DNA Repair (Amst) 2009, 8:360-369.
49. Morgan E.A., Shah N., Symington L.S. The requirement for ATP hydrolysis by Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad51 is bypassed by mating-type heterozygosity or RAD54 in high copy. Mol Cell Biol 2002, 22:6336-6343.
50. Mazin A.V., Mazina O.M., Bugreev D.V., Rossi M.J. Rad54, the motor of homologous recombination. DNA Repair (Amst) 2010, 9:286-302.
51. Ceballos S.J., Heyer W.D. Functions of the Snf2/Swi2 family Rad54 motor protein in homologous recombination. Biochim Biophys Acta 2011, 1809:509-523.
52. Agarwal S., van Cappellen Wa., Guénolé A., Eppink B., Linsen S.E.V., Meijering E., Houtsmuller A., Kanaar R., Essers J. ATP-dependent and independent functions of Rad54 in genome maintenance. J Cell Biol 2011, 192:735-750.
53. Gehlen L.R., Gasser S.M., Dion V. How broken DNA finds its template for repair: a computational approach. Prog Theor Phys Suppl 2011, 191:20.
54. Gartenberg M.R., Neumann F.R., Laroche T., Blaszczyk M., Gasser S.M. Sir-mediated repression can occur independently of chromosomal and subnuclear contexts. Cell 2004, 119:955-967.
55. Dion V., Kalck V., Horigome C., Towbin B.D., Gasser S.M. Increased mobility of double-strand breaks requires Mec1, Rad9 and the homologous recombination machinery. Nat Cell Biol 2012, 14:502-509.
56. Mine-Hattab J., Rothstein R. Increased chromosome mobility facilitates homology search during recombination. Nat Cell Biol 2012, 14:510-517.
57. Krawczyk P.M., Borovski T., Stap J., Cijsouw T., ten Cate R., Medema J.P., Kanaar R., Franken N.A., Aten J.A. Chromatin mobility is increased at sites of DNA double-strand breaks. J Cell Sci 2012, 125:2127-2133.
58. Zhang Z., Fan H.Y., Goldman J.A., Kingston R.E. Homology-driven chromatin remodeling by human RAD54. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2007, 14:397-405.
59. Alexeev A., Mazin A., Kowalczykowski S.C. Rad54 protein possesses chromatin-remodeling activity stimulated by the Rad51-ssDNA nucleoprotein filament. Nat Struct Biol 2003, 10:182-186.
60. Park E.J., Hur S.K., Kwon J. Human INO80 chromatin-remodelling complex contributes to DNA double-strand break repair via the expression of Rad54B and XRCC3 genes. Biochem J 2010, 431:179-187.
61. Luijsterburg M.S., van Attikum H. Chromatin and the DNA damage response: the cancer connection. Mol Oncol 2011, 5:349-367.
62. Wilson J.H., Leung W.Y., Bosco G., Dieu D., Haber J.E. The frequency of gene targeting in yeast depends on the number of target copies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1994, 91:177-181.
63. Shen X., Ranallo R., Choi E., Wu C. Involvement of actin-related proteins in ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling. Mol Cell 2003, 12:147-155.
64. Larsen D.H., Poinsignon C., Gudjonsson T., Dinant C., Payne M.R., Hari F.J., Rendtlew Danielsen J.M., Menard P., Sand J.C., Stucki M., et al. The chromatin-remodeling factor CHD4 coordinates signaling and repair after DNA damage. J Cell Biol 2010, 190:731-740.
65. Oum J.H., Seong C., Kwon Y., Ji J.H., Sid A., Ramakrishnan S., Ira G., Malkova A., Sung P., Lee S.E., et al. RSC facilitates Rad59-dependent homologous recombination between sister chromatids by promoting cohesin loading at DNA double-strand breaks. Mol Cell Biol 2011, 31:3924-3937.
66. Naidu S.R., Love I.M., Imbalzano A.N., Grossman S.R., Androphy E.J. The SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling subunit BRG1 is a critical regulator of p53 necessary for proliferation of malignant cells. Oncogene 2009, 28:2492-2501.
67. Park J.H., Park E.J., Hur S.K., Kim S., Kwon J. Mammalian SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complexes are required to prevent apoptosis after DNA damage. DNA Repair (Amst) 2009, 8:29-39.