Nonhomologous end joining in yeast

Annual Review of Genetics

Volumn 39, Issue , 2005, Pages 431-451

  Daley, James M ^a   Palmbos, Phillip L ^a   Wu, Dongliang ^a   Wilson, Thomas E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Double strand break; Illegitimate recombination; Nonhomologous end joining; Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Indexed keywords

DNA DEPENDENT PROTEIN KINASE; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA;

CHROMATIN; CHROMOSOME REARRANGEMENT; DNA BINDING; DNA STRAND BREAKAGE; NONHUMAN; PLOIDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, FUNGAL; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EUKARYOTA; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 29244463205     PISSN: 00664197     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.genet.39.073003.113340     Document Type: Review

References (104)

1. Audebert M, Salles B, Calsou P. 2004. Involvement of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 and XRCC1/DNA ligase III in an alternative route for DNA double-strand breaks rejoining. J. Biol. Chem. 279:55117-26
2. Aylon Y, Kupiec M. 2003. The checkpoint protein Rad24 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is involved in processing double-strand break ends and in recombination partner choice. Mol. Cell Biol. 23:6585-96
3. Aylon Y, Kupiec M. 2004. DSB repair: the yeast paradigm. DNA Repair 3:797-815
4. Aylon Y, Liefshitz B, Kupiec M. 2 004. The CDK regulates repair of double-strand breaks by homologous recombination during the cell cycle. EMBO J. 23:4868-75
5. Bebenek K, Garcia-Diaz M, Patishall SR, Kunkel TA. 2005. Biochemical properties of Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA polymerase IV. J. Biol. Chem. 280:20051-58
6. Bertuch AA, Lundblad V. 2003. The Ku heterodimer performs separable activities at double-strand breaks and chromosome termini. Mol. Cell Biol. 23:8202-15
7. Bird AW, Yu DY, Pray-Grant MG, Qiu Q, Harmon KE, et al. 2002. Acetylation of histone H4 by Esa1 is required for DNA double-strand break repair. Nature 419:411-15
8. Boulton SJ, Jackson SP. 1996. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ku70 potentiates illegitimate DNA double-strand break repair and serves as a barrier to error-prone DNA repair pathways. EMBO J. 15:5093-103
9. Boulton SJ, Jackson SP. 1998. Components of the Ku-dependent non-homologous end-joining pathway are involved in telomeric length maintenance and telomeric silencing. EMBO J. 17:1819-28
10. Braithwaite EK, Prasad R, Shock DD, Hou EW, Beard WA, Wilson SH. 2005. DNA polymerase λ mediates a back-up base excision repair activity in extracts of mouse embryonic fibroblasts. J. Biol. Chem. 280:18469-75
11. Budman J, Chu G. 2005. Processing of DNA for nonhomologous end-joining by cell-free extract. EMBO J. 24:849-60
12. Burma S, Chen DJ. 2004. Role of DNA-PK in the cellular response to DNA double-strand breaks. DNA Repair 3:909-18
13. Butler G, Kenny C, Fagan A, Kurischko C, Gaillardin C, Wolfe KH. 2004. Evolution of the MAT locus and its HO endonuclease in yeast species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:1632-37
14. Cadet J, Douki T, Gasparutto D, Ravanat JL. 2003. Oxidative damage to DNA: formation, measurement and biochemical features. Mutat. Res. 531:5-23
15. Caldecott KW. 2003. Protein-protein interactions during mammalian DNA single-strand break repair. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 31:247-51
16. Chan SW, Blackburn EH. 2003. Telomerase and ATM/Tel1p protect telomeres from nonhomologous end joining. Mol. Cell 11:1379-87
17. Chen L, Trujillo K, Ramos W, Sung P, Tomkinson AE. 2001. Promotion of Dnl4-catalyzed DNA end-joining by the Rad50/Mre11/Xrs2 and Hdf1/Hdf2 complexes. Mol. Cell 8:1105-15
18. Chen L, Trujillo KM, Van Komen S, Roh DH, Krejci L, et al. 2005. Effect of amino acid substitutions in the Rad50 ATP binding domain on DNA double strand break repair in yeast. J. Biol. Chem. 280:2620-27
19. 18a. Cheung WL, Turner FB, Krishnamoorthy T, Wolner B, Ahn SH, et al. 2005. Phosphorylation of histone H4 serine 1 during DNA damage requires casein kinase II in S. cerevisiae. Curr. Biol. 15:656-60
20. Clatworthy AE, Valencia MA, Haber JE, Oettinger MA. 2003. V(D)J recombination and RAG-mediated transposition in yeast. Mol. Cell 12:489-99
21. Daley JM, Wilson TE. 2005. Rejoining of DNA double-strand breaks as a function of overhang length. Mol. Cell Biol. 25:896-906
22. Daley JM, Vander Laan RL, Suresh A, Wilson TE. 2005. DNA joint dependence of Pol X family polymerase action in nonhomologous end joining. J. Biol. Chem. In press
23. de la Torre-Ruiz M, Lowndes NF. 2000. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA damage checkpoint is required for efficient repair of double strand breaks by non-homologous end joining. FEBS Lett. 467:311-15
24. Della M, Palmbos PL, Tseng HM, Tonkin LM, Daley JM, et al. 2004. Mycobacterial Ku and ligase proteins constitute a two-component NHEJ repair machine. Science 306:683-85
25. Derbyshire DJ, Basu BP, Serpell LC, Joo WS, Date T, et al. 2002. Crystal structure of human 53BP1 BRCT domains bound to p53 tumour suppressor. EMBO J. 21:3863-72
26. Doherty AJ, Jackson SP, Weller GR. 2001. Identification of bacterial homologues of the Ku DNA repair proteins. FEBS Lett. 500:186-88
27. Downs JA, Lowndes NF, Jackson SP. 2000. A role for Saccharomyces cerevisiae histone H2A in DNA repair. Nature 408:1001-4
28. Driller L, Wellinger RJ, Larrivee M, Kremmer E, Jaklin S, Feldmann HM. 2000. A short C-terminal domain of Yku70p is essential for telomere maintenance. J. Biol. Chem. 275:24921-27
29. Dudášová Z, Dudas A, Chovanec M. 2004. Non-homologous end-joining factors of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 28:581-601
30. Durocher D, Henckel J, Fersht AR, Jackson SP. 1999. The FHA domain is a modular phosphopeptide recognition motif. Mol. Cell 4:387-94
31. Frank-Vaillant M, Marcand S. 2001. NHEJ regulation by mating type is exercised through a novel protein, Lif2p, essential to the ligase IV pathway. Genes Dev. 15:3005-12
32. Frank-Vaillant M, Marcand S. 2002. Transient stability of DNA ends allows non-homologous end joining to precede homologous recombination. Mol. Cell 10:1189-99
33. Garcia-Diaz M, Bebenek K, Krahn JM, Blanco L, Kunkel TA, Pedersen LC. 2004. A structural solution for the DNA polymerase λ-dependent repair of DNA gaps with minimal homology. Mol. Cell 13:561-72
34. Gell D, Jackson SP. 1999. Mapping of protein-protein interactions within the DNA-dependent protein kinase complex. Nucleic Acids Res. 27:3494-502
35. Haber JE. 2002. Uses and abuses of HO endonuclease. Methods Enzymol. 350:141-64
36. Haber JE, Leung WY. 1996. Lack of chromosome territoriality in yeast: promiscuous rejoining of broken chromosome ends. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:13949-54
37. Haghnazari E, Heyer WD. 2004. The DNA damage checkpoint pathways exert multiple controls on the efficiency and outcome of the repair of a double-stranded DNA gap. Nucleic Acids Res. 32:4257-68
38. Harris R, Esposito D, Sankar A, Maman JD, Hinks JA, et al. 2004. The 3D solution structure of the C-terminal region of Ku86 (KuSoCTR). J. Mol. Biol. 335:573-82
39. Heidenreich E, Novotny R, Kneidinger B, Holzmann V, Wintersberger U. 2003. Non-homologous end joining as an important mutagenic process in cell cycle-arrested cells. EMBO J. 22:2274-83
40. Herman PK. 2002. Stationary phase in yeast. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 5:602-07
41. Herrmann G, Lindahl T, Schar P. 1998. Saccharomyces cerevisiae LIF1: a function involved in DNA double-strand break repair related to mammalian XRCC4. EMBO J. 17:4188-98
42. Hill MA. 1999. Radiation damage to DNA: the importance of track structure. Radiat. Meas. 31:15-23
43. Hopfher KP, Craig L, Moncalian G, Zinkel RA, Usui T, et al. 2002. The Rad50 zinc-hook is a structure joining Mre11 complexes in DNA recombination and repair. Nature 418:562-66
44. Hopfner KP, Karcher A, Craig L, Woo TT, Carney JP, Tainer JA. 2001. Structural biochemistry and interaction architecture of the DNA double-strand break repair Mre11 nuclease and Rad50-ATPase. Cell 105:473-85
45. Hopfner KP, Karcher A, Shin DS, Craig L, Arthur LM, et al. 2000. Structural biology of Rad50 ATPase: ATP-driven conformational control in DNA double-strand break repair and the ABC-ATPase superfamily. Cell 101:789-800
46. Ira G, Pellicioli A, Balijja A, Wang X, Fiorani S, et al. 2004. DNA end resection, homologous recombination and DNA damage checkpoint activation require CDK1. Nature 431:1011-17
47. Ivanov EL, Haber JE. 1995. RAD1 and RAD10, but not other excision repair genes, are required for double-strand break-induced recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell Biol. 15:2245-51
48. Jazayeri A, McAinsh AD, Jackson SP. 2004. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sin3p facilitates DNA double-strand break repair. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:1644-49
49. Junop MS, Modesti M, Guarne A, Ghirlando R, Gellert M, Yang W. 2000. Crystal structure of XRCC4 DNA repair protein and implications for end joining. EMBO J. 19:5962-70
50. Karathanasis E, Wilson TE. 2002. Enhancement of Saccharomyces cerevisiae end-joining efficiency by cell growth stage but not by impairment of recombination. Genetics 161:1015-27
51. Kegel A, Sjostrand JO, Astrom SU. 2001. Nej1p, a cell type-specific regulator of nonhomologous end joining in yeast. Curr. Biol. 11:1611-17
52. Koch CA, Agyei R, Galicia S, Metalnikov P, O'Donnell P, et al. 2004. XRCC4 physically links DNA end processing by polynucleotide kinase to DNA ligation by DNA ligase IV. EMBOJ. 23:3874-85
53. Krogan NJ, Lam MH, Fillingham J, Keogh MC, Gebbia M, et al. 2004. Proteasome involvement in the repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Mol. Cell 16:1027-34
54. Krogh BO, Symington LS. 2004. Recombination proteins in yeast. Annu. Rev. Genet. 38:233-71
55. Kysela B, Doherty AJ, Chovanec M, Stiff T, Ameer-Beg SM, et al. 2003. Ku stimulation of DNA ligase IV-dependent ligation requires inward movement along the DNA molecule. J. Biol. Chem. 278:22466-74
56. Lee JH, Paull TT. 2005. ATM activation by DNA double-strand breaks through the Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 complex. Science 308:551-54
57. Lee SE, Paques F, Sylvan J, Haber JE. 1999. Role of yeast SIR genes and mating type in directing DNA double-strand breaks to homologous and non-homologous repair paths. Curr. Biol. 9:767-70
58. Li X, Moses RE. 2003. The beta-lactamase motif in Snm1 is required for repair of DNA double-strand breaks caused by interstrand crosslinks in S. cerevisiae. DNA Repair 2:121-29
59. Liao H, Yuan C, Su MI, Yongkiettrakul S, Qin D, et al. 2000. Structure of the FHA1 domain of yeast Rad53 and identification of binding sites for both FHA1 and its target protein Rad9 J. Mol. Biol. 304:941-51
60. Lisby M, Barlow JH, Burgess RC, Rothstein R. 2004. Choreography of the DNA damage response; spatiotemporal relationships among checkpoint and repair proteins. Cell 118:699-713
61. Lobachev K, Vitriol E, Stemple J, Resnick MA, Bloom K. 2004. Chromosome fragmentation after induction of a double-strand break is an active process prevented by the RMX repair complex. Curr. Biol. 14:2107-12
62. Lobachev KS, Gordenin DA, Resnick MA. 2002. The Mre11 complex is required for repair of hairpin-capped double-strand breaks and prevention of chromosome rearrangements. Cell 108:183-93
63. Ma JL, Kim EM, Haber JE, Lee SE. 2003. Yeast Mre11 and Rad1 proteins define a Ku-independent mechanism to repair double-strand breaks lacking overlapping end sequences. Mol. Cell Biol. 23:8820-28
64. Ma Y, Lu H, Tippin B, Goodman MF, Shimazaki N, et al. 2004. A biochemically defined system for mammalian nonhomologous DNA end joining. Mol. Cell 16:701-13
65. Ma Y, Pannicke U, Schwarz K, Lieber MR. 2002. Hairpin opening and overhang processing by an Artemis/DNA-dependent protein kinase complex in nonhomologous end joining and V(D)J recombination. Cell 108:781-94
66. Mathieu N, Pirzio L, Freulet-Marriere MA, Desmaze C, Sabatier L. 2004. Telomeres and chromosomal instability. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 61:641-56
67. McInnis M, O'Neill G, Fossum K, Reagan MS. 2002. Epistatic analysis of the roles of the RAD27 and POL4 gene products in DNA base excision repair in S. cerevisiae. DNA Repair 1:311-15
68. Michel B, Grompone G, Flores MJ, Bidnenko V. 2004. Multiple pathways process stalled replication forks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:12783-88
69. Modesti M, Hesse JE, Gellert M. 1999. DNA binding of XRCC4 protein is associated with V(D)J recombination but not with stimulation of DNA ligase FV activity. EMBO J. 18:2008-18
70. Moore JK, Haber JE. 1996. Cell cycle and genetic requirements of two pathways of nonhomologous end-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell Biol. 16:2164-73
71. Moreau S, Ferguson JR, Symington LS. 1999. The nuclease activity of Mre11 is required for meiosis but not for mating type switching, end joining, or telomere maintenance. Mol. Cell Biol. 19:556-66
72. Moreau S, Morgan EA, Symington LS. 2001. Overlapping functions of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mre11, Exo1 and Rad27 nucleases in DNA metabolism. Genetics 159:1423-33
73. Mortensen UH, Bendixen C, Sunjevaric I, Rothstein R. 1996. DNA strand annealing is promoted by the yeast Rad52 protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:10729-34
74. Myung K, Chen C, Kolodner RD. 2001. Multiple pathways cooperate in the suppression of genome instability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 411:1073-76
75. Nick McElhinny SA, Ramsden DA. 2004. Sibling rivalry: competition between Pol X family members in V(D)J recombination and general double strand break repair. Immunol. Rev. 200:156-64
76. Ooi SL, Shoemaker DD, Boeke JD. 2001. A DNA microarray-based genetic screen for nonhomologous end-joining mutants in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 294:2552-56
77. Pascal JM, O'Brien PJ, Tomkinson AE, Ellenberger T. 2004. Human DNA ligase I completely encircles and partially unwinds nicked DNA. Nature 432:473-78
78. Perrault R, Wang H, Wang M, Rosidi B, Iliakis G. 2004. Backup pathways of NHEJ are suppressed by DNA-PK. J. Cell. Biochem. 92:781-94
79. Schar P, Fasi M, Jessberger R. 2004. SMC1 coordinates DNA double-strand break repair pathways. Nucleic Acids Res. 32:3921-29
80. Shim EY, Ma JL, Oum JH, Yanez Y, Lee SE. 2005. The yeast chromatin remodeler RSC complex facilitates end joining repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Mol. Cell Biol. 25:3934-44
81. Shima H, Suzuki M, Shinohara M. 2005. Isolation and characterization of novel xrs2 mutations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 170:71-85
82. Shiozaki EN, Gu L, Yan N, Shi Y. 2004. Structure of the BRCT repeats of BRCA1 bound to a BACH1 phosphopeptide: implications for signaling. Mol. Cell 14:405-12
83. Sibanda BL, Critchlow SE, Begun J, Pei XY, Jackson SP, et al. 2001. Crystal structure of an XRCC4-DNA ligase IV complex. Nat. Struct. Biol. 8:1015-19
84. Stracker TH, Theunissen JW, Morales M, Petrini JH. 2004. The Mre11 complex and the metabolism of chromosome breaks: the importance of communicating and holding things together. DNA Repair 3:845-54
85. Sugawara N, Ira G, Haber JE. 2000. DNA length dependence of the single-strand annealing pathway and the role of Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD59 in double-strand break repair. Mol. Cell Biol. 20:5300-9
86. Taddei A, Hediger F, Neumann FR, Bauer C, Gasser SM. 2004. Separation of silencing from perinuclear anchoring functions in yeast Ku80, Sir4 and Esc1 proteins. EMBO J. 23:1301-12
87. Teo SH, Jackson SP. 2000. Lif1p targets the DNA ligase Lig4p to sites of DNA double-strand breaks. Curr. Biol. 10:165-68
88. Trujillo KM, Roh DH, Chen L, Van Komen S, Tomkinson A, Sung P. 2003. Yeast Xrs2 binds DNA and helps target Rad50 and Mre11 to DNA ends. J. Biol. Chem. 278:48957-64
89. Trujillo KM, Sung P. 2001. DNA structure-specific nuclease activities in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad50-Mre11 complex. J. Biol. Chem. 276:35458-64
90. Tseng HM, Tomkinson AE. 2002. A physical and functional interaction between yeast Pol4 and Dnl4/Lif1 links DNA synthesis and ligation in non-homologous end joining. J. Biol. Chem. 13:45630-37
91. Tseng HM, Tomkinson AE. 2004. Processing and joining of DNA ends coordinated by interactions among Dnl4/Lif1, Pol4, and FEN-1. J. Biol. Chem. 279:47580-88
92. Usui T, Ogawa H, Petrini JH. 2001. A DNA damage response pathway controlled by Tel1 and the Mre11 complex. Mol. Cell 7:1255-66
93. Valencia M, Bentele M, Vaze MB, Herrmann G, Kraus E, et al. 2001. NEJ1 controls non-homologous end joining in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 414:666-69
94. van Attikum H, Fritsch O, Hohn B, Gasser SM. 2004. Recruitment of the INO80 complex by H2A phosphorylation links ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling with DNA double-strand break repair. Cell 119:777-88
95. Walker JR, Corpina MA, Goldberg J. 2001. Structure of the Ku heterodimer bound to DNA and its implications for double-strand break repair. Nature 412:607-14
96. Wilson TE. 2002. A genomics-based screen for yeast mutants with an altered recombination/end-joining repair ratio. Genetics 162:677-88
97. Wilson TE, Grawunder U, Lieber MR. 1997. Yeast DNA ligase IV mediates non-homologous DNA end joining. Nature 388:495-98
98. Wilson TE, Lieber MR. 1999. Efficient processing of DNA ends during yeast nonhomologous end joining. Evidence for a DNA polymerase β (Pol4)-dependent pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 274:23599-609
99. Wu X, Wilson TE, Lieber MR. 1999. A role for FEN-1 in nonhomologous DNA end joining: the order of strand annealing and nucleolytic processing events. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:1303-8
100. Yu J, Marshall K, Yamaguchi M, Haber JE, Weil CF. 2004. Microhomology-dependent end joining and repair of transposon-induced DNA hairpins by host factors in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell Biol. 24:1351-64
101. Yu X, Gabriel A. 2004. Reciprocal translocations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae formed by nonhomologous end joining. Genetics 166:741-51
102. Zhang X, Morera S, Bates PA, Whitehead PC, Coffer AI, et al. 1998. Structure of an XRCC1 BRCT domain: a new protein-protein interaction module. EMBO J. 17:6404-11
103. Zou L, Elledge SJ. 2003. Sensing DNA damage through ATRIP recognition of RPA-ssDNA complexes. Science 300:1542-48
104. Haber JE. 1998. Mating-type gene switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Annu. Rev. Genet. 32:561-99