Multiple phosphorylation of Rad9 by CDK is required for DNA damage checkpoint activation

Cell Cycle

Volumn 11, Issue 20, 2012, Pages 3792-3800

  Wang, Guoliang ^a   Tong, Xiangyan ^a   Weng, Stephanie ^a   Zhou, Huilin ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

BRCT; CDK; Dpb11; Mec1; Rad53; Rad9

Indexed keywords

EID: 84868034800     PISSN: 15384101     EISSN: 15514005     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/cc.21987     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Nyberg KA, Michelson RJ, Putnam CW, Weinert TA. Toward maintaining the genome: DNA damage and replication checkpoints. Annu Rev Genet 2002;36:617-56; PMID:12429704; http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev. genet.36.060402.113540. (Pubitemid 36109200)
2. Zhou BB, Elledge SJ. The DNA damage response: putting checkpoints in perspective. Nature 2000;408:433-9; PMID:11100718; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ 35044005.
3. Harrison JC, Haber JE. Surviving the breakup: the DNA damage checkpoint. Annu Rev Genet 2006;40:209-35; PMID:16805667; http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev. genet.40.051206.105231. (Pubitemid 44956785)
4. Weinert TA, Hartwell LH. The RAD9 gene controls the cell cycle response to DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 1988;241:317-22; PMID:3291120; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.3291120.
5. Ira G, Pellicioli A, Balijja A, Wang X, Fiorani S, Carotenuto W, et al. DNA end resection, homologous recombination and DNA damage checkpoint activation require CDK1. Nature 2004;431:1011-7; PMID:15496928; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ nature02964. (Pubitemid 39434425)
6. Wang B, Matsuoka S, Carpenter PB, Elledge SJ. 53BP1, a mediator of the DNA damage checkpoint. Science 2002;298:1435-8; PMID:12364621; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1076182. (Pubitemid 35346146)
7. Lee JH, Goodarzi AA, Jeggo PA, Paull T T. 53BP1 promotes ATM activity through direct interactions with the MRN complex. EMBO J 2010;29:574-85; PMID:20010693; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2009.372.
8. Albuquerque C P, Smolka MB, Payne SH, Bafna V, Eng J, Zhou H. A multidimensional chromatography technology for in-depth phosphoproteome analysis. Mol Cell Proteomics 2008;7:1389-96; PMID:18407956; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/mcp. M700468-MCP200. (Pubitemid 352038280)
9. Vialard JE, Gilbert CS, Green CM, Lowndes N F. The budding yeast Rad9 checkpoint protein is subjected to Mec1/Tel1-dependent hyperphosphorylation and interacts with Rad53 after DNA damage. EMBO J 1998;17:5679-88; PMID:9755168; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/17.19.5679. (Pubitemid 28445979)
10. van Vugt MA, Gardino AK, Linding R, Ostheimer GJ, Reinhardt HC, Ong SE, et al. A mitotic phos-phorylation feedback network connects Cdk1, Plk1, 53BP1, and Chk2 to inactivate the G (2)/M DNA damage checkpoint. PLoS Biol 2010;8:e1000287; PMID:20126263; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal. pbio.1000287.
11. Linding R, Jensen LJ, Ostheimer GJ, van Vugt MA, Jørgensen C, Miron IM, et al. Systematic discovery of in vivo phosphorylation networks. Cell 2007;129:1415-26; PMID:17570479; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.05.052. (Pubitemid 46962092)
12. Bonilla CY, Melo JA, Toczyski D P. Colocalization of sensors is sufficient to activate the DNA damage checkpoint in the absence of damage. Mol Cell 2008;30:267-76; PMID:18471973; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2008.03. 023. (Pubitemid 351615321)
13. Granata M, Lazzaro F, Novarina D, Panigada D, Puddu F, Abreu CM, et al. Dynamics of Rad9 chromatin binding and checkpoint function are mediated by its dimerization and are cell cycle-regulated by CDK1 activity. PLoS Genet 2010;6:6; PMID:20700441; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen. 1001047.
14. Pfander B, Diffley J F. Dpb11 coordinates Mec1 kinase activation with cell cycle-regulated Rad9 recruitment. EMBO J 2011;30:4897-907; PMID:21946560; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2011.345.
15. Du LL, Nakamura TM, Russell P. Histone modification-dependent and -independent pathways for recruitment of checkpoint protein Crb2 to double-strand breaks. Genes Dev 2006;20:1583-96; PMID:16778077; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1422606. (Pubitemid 43901098)
16. Sofueva S, Du LL, Limbo O, Williams JS, Russell P. BRCT domain interactions with phospho-histone H2A target Crb2 to chromatin at double-strand breaks and maintain the DNA damage checkpoint. Mol Cell Biol 2010;30:4732-43; PMID:20679485; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00413-10.
17. Nakamura TM, Du LL, Redon C, Russell P. Histone H2A phosphorylation controls Crb2 recruitment at DNA breaks, maintains checkpoint arrest, and influences DNA repair in fission yeast. Mol Cell Biol 2004;24:6215-30; PMID:15226425; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.24.14.6215-6230.2004. (Pubitemid 38891124)
18. Nakamura TM, Moser BA, Du LL, Russell P. Cooperative control of Crb2 by ATM family and Cdc2 kinases is essential for the DNA damage checkpoint in fission yeast. Mol Cell Biol 2005;25:10721-30; PMID:16314498; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.25.24.10721-10730.2005. (Pubitemid 41747118)
19. Saka Y, Esashi F, Matsusaka T, Mochida S, Yanagida M. Damage and replication checkpoint control in fission yeast is ensured by interactions of Crb2, a protein with BRCT motif, with Cut5 and Chk1. Genes Dev 1997;11:3387-400; PMID:9407031; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.11.24.3387. (Pubitemid 28023961)
20. Mochida S, Esashi F, Aono N, Tamai K, O'Connell MJ, Yanagida M. Regulation of checkpoint kinases through dynamic interaction with Crb2. EMBO J 2004;23:418-28; PMID:14739927; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7600018. (Pubitemid 38294506)
21. Zegerman P, Diffley J F. Phosphorylation of Sld2 and Sld3 by cyclin-dependent kinases promotes DNA replication in budding yeast. Nature 2007;445:281-5; PMID:17167417; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature05432. (Pubitemid 46122811)
22. Schwartz MF, Duong JK, Sun Z, Morrow JS, Pradhan D, Stern D F. Rad9 phosphorylation sites couple Rad53 to the Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA damage checkpoint. Mol Cell 2002;9:1055-65; PMID:12049741; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ S1097-2765 (02) 00532-4. (Pubitemid 34626674)
23. Sun Z, Hsiao J, Fay DS, Stern DF. Rad53 FHA domain associated with phosphorylated Rad9 in the DNA damage checkpoint. Science 1998;281:272-4; PMID:9657725; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sci-ence.281.5374.272. (Pubitemid 28334513)
24. Chen SH, Smolka MB, Zhou H. Mechanism of Dun1 activation by Rad53 phosphorylation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 2007;282:986-95; PMID:17114794; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc. M609322200. (Pubitemid 47076565)
25. Tanaka K, Russell P. Mrc1 channels the DNA replication arrest signal to checkpoint kinase Cds1. Nat Cell Biol 2001;3:966-72; PMID:11715017; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1101-966. (Pubitemid 34428741)
26. Osborn AJ, Elledge SJ. Mrc1 is a replication fork component whose phosphorylation in response to DNA replication stress activates Rad53. Genes Dev 2003;17:1755-67; PMID:12865299; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1098303. (Pubitemid 36870338)
27. Tong AH, Evangelista M, Parsons AB, Xu H, Bader GD, Pagé N, et al. Systematic genetic analysis with ordered arrays of yeast deletion mutants. Science 2001;294:2364-8; PMID:11743205; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science. 1065810. (Pubitemid 33140562)
28. Zhao X, Muller EG, Rothstein R. A suppressor of two essential checkpoint genes identifies a novel protein that negatively affects dNTP pools. Mol Cell 1998;2:329-40; PMID:9774971; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765 (00) 80277-4. (Pubitemid 128379273)
29. Wang H, Elledge SJ. Genetic and physical interactions between DPB11 and DDC1 in the yeast DNA damage response pathway. Genetics 2002;160:1295-304; PMID:11973288. (Pubitemid 34454356)
30. Puddu F, Granata M, Di Nola L, Balestrini A, Piergiovanni G, Lazzaro F, et al. Phosphorylation of the budding yeast 9-1-1 complex is required for Dpb11 function in the full activation of the UV-induced DNA damage checkpoint. Mol Cell Biol 2008;28:4782-93; PMID:18541674; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00330- 08.
31. Germann SM, Oestergaard VH, Haas C, Salis P, Motegi A, Lisby M. Dpb11/TopBP1 plays distinct roles in DNA replication, checkpoint response and homologous recombination. DNA Repair (Amst) 2011;10:210-24; PMID:21130053; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep. 2010.11.001.
32. Masumoto H, Muramatsu S, Kamimura Y, Araki H. S-Cdk-dependent phosphorylation of Sld2 essential for chromosomal DNA replication in budding yeast. Nature 2002;415:651-5; PMID:11807498; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ nature713. (Pubitemid 34136393)
33. Zegerman P, Diffley J F. Checkpoint-dependent inhibition of DNA replication initiation by Sld3 and Dbf4 phosphorylation. Nature 2010;467:474-8; PMID:20835227; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature09373.
34. Nash P, Tang X, Orlicky S, Chen Q, Gertler FB, Mendenhall MD, et al. Multisite phosphorylation of a CDK inhibitor sets a threshold for the onset of DNA replication. Nature 2001;414:514-21; PMID:11734846; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1038/35107009. (Pubitemid 33131529)
35. Longtine MS, McKenzie A 3rd, Demarini DJ, Shah NG, Wach A, Brachat A, et al. Additional modules for versatile and economical PCR-based gene deletion and modification in Saccharomyces cere-visiae. Yeast 1998;14:953-61; PMID:9717241; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI) 1097-0061 (199807) 14:10<953::AID- YEA293>3.0. CO;2-U. (Pubitemid 28328001)