Cell cycle regulation of DNA double-strand break end resection by Cdk1-dependent Dna2 phosphorylation

Nature Structural and Molecular Biology

Volumn 18, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 1015-1019

  Chen, Xuefeng ^a   Niu, Hengyao ^b   Chung, Woo Hyun ^a   Zhu, Zhu ^a   Papusha, Alma ^a   Shim, Eun Yong ^c   Lee, Sang Eun ^c   Sung, Patrick ^b   Ira, Grzegorz ^a  

^a BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c University of Texas Health Science Center   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYCLIN DEPENDENT KINASE 1; DNA TOPOISOMERASE; HELICASE; SERINE; SINGLE STRANDED DNA; THREONINE;

ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE REGULATION; DNA RECOMBINATION; DNA REPLICATION; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

CDC2 PROTEIN KINASE; DNA BREAKS, DOUBLE-STRANDED; DNA HELICASES; EXODEOXYRIBONUCLEASES; INTRACELLULAR SIGNALING PEPTIDES AND PROTEINS; MODELS, GENETIC; PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN-SERINE-THREONINE KINASES; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 80052492286     PISSN: 15459993     EISSN: 15459985     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nsmb.2105     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Malumbres, M. & Barbacid, M. Cell cycle, CDKs and cancer: a changing paradigm. Nat. Rev. Cancer 9, 153-166 (2009).
2. Enserink, J.M. & Kolodner, R.D. An overview of Cdk1-controlled targets and processes. Cell Div. 5, 11 (2010).
3. Saponaro, M. et al. Cdk1 targets Srs2 to complete synthesis-dependent strand annealing and to promote recombinational repair. PLoS Genet. 6, e1000858 (2010).
4. Caspari, T., Murray, J.M. & Carr, A.M. Cdc2-cyclin B kinase activity links Crb2 and Rqh1-topoisomerase III. Genes Dev. 16, 1195-1208 (2002). (Pubitemid 34553101)
5. Granata, M. et al. Dynamics of Rad9 chromatin binding and checkpoint function are mediated by its dimerization and are cell cycle-regulated by CDK1 activity. PLoS Genet. 6, pii: e1001047 (2010).
6. Diani, L. et al. Saccharomyces CDK1 phosphorylates Rad53 kinase in metaphase, influencing cellular morphogenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 32627-32634 (2009).
7. Schleker, T., Shimada, K., Sack, R., Pike, B.L. & Gasser, S.M. Cell cycle-dependent phosphorylation of Rad53 kinase by Cdc5 and Cdc28 modulates checkpoint adaptation. Cell Cycle 9, 350-363 (2010).
8. Esashi, F. et al. CDK-dependent phosphorylation of BRCA2 as a regulatory mechanism for recombinational repair. Nature 434, 598-604 (2005). (Pubitemid 40488546)
9. Aylon, Y., Liefshitz, B. & Kupiec, M. The CDK regulates repair of double-strand breaks by homologous recombination during the cell cycle. EMBO J. 23, 4868-4875 (2004). (Pubitemid 40069716)
10. Ira, G. et al. DNA end resection, homologous recombination and DNA damage checkpoint activation require CDK1. Nature 431, 1011-1017 (2004). (Pubitemid 39434425)
11. Ferreira, M.G. & Cooper, J.P. Two modes of DNA double-strand break repair are reciprocally regulated through the fission yeast cell cycle. Genes Dev. 18, 2249-2254 (2004). (Pubitemid 39209573)
12. Jazayeri, A. et al. ATM-and cell cycle-dependent regulation of ATR in response to DNA double-strand breaks. Nat. Cell Biol. 8, 37-45 (2006). (Pubitemid 43064795)
13. Barlow, J.H., Lisby, M. & Rothstein, R. Differential regulation of the cellular response to DNA double-strand breaks in G1. Mol. Cell 30, 73-85 (2008). (Pubitemid 351470149)
14. Janke, R. et al. A truncated DNA-damage-signaling response is activated after DSB formation in the G1 phase of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, 2302-2313 (2010).
15. Huertas, P., Cortes-Ledesma, F., Sartori, A.A., Aguilera, A. & Jackson, S.P. CDK targets Sae2 to control DNA-end resection and homologous recombination. Nature 455, 689-692 (2008).
16. Huertas, P. & Jackson, S.P. Human CtIP mediates cell cycle control of DNA end resection and double strand break repair. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 9558-9565 (2009).
17. Yun, M.H. & Hiom, K. CtIP-BRCA1 modulates the choice of DNA double-strand-break repair pathway throughout the cell cycle. Nature 459, 460-463 (2009).
18. Limbo, O. et al. Ctp1 is a cell-cycle-regulated protein that functions with Mre11 complex to control double-strand break repair by homologous recombination. Mol. Cell 28, 134-146 (2007). (Pubitemid 47531975)
19. Bonetti, D., Martina, M., Clerici, M., Lucchini, G. & Longhese, M.P. Multiple pathways regulate 3′ overhang generation at S. cerevisiae telomeres. Mol. Cell 35, 70-81 (2009).
20. Clerici, M., Mantiero, D., Guerini, I., Lucchini, G. & Longhese, M.P. The Yku70-Yku80 complex contributes to regulate double-strand break processing and checkpoint activation during the cell cycle. EMBO Rep. 9, 810-818 (2008).
21. Zhang, Y. et al. Role of Dnl4-Lif1 in nonhomologous end-joining repair complex assembly and suppression of homologous recombination. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 14, 639-646 (2007). (Pubitemid 47037068)
22. Zierhut, C. & Diffley, J.F. Break dosage, cell cycle stage and DNA replication influence DNA double strand break response. EMBO J. 27, 1875-1885 (2008). (Pubitemid 351960208)
23. Cejka, P. et al. DNA end resection by Dna2-Sgs1-RPA and its stimulation by Top3-Rmi1 and Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2. Nature 467, 112-116 (2010).
24. Niu, H. et al. Mechanism of the ATP-dependent DNA end-resection machinery from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 467, 108-111 (2010).
25. Nicolette, M.L. et al. Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 and Sae2 promote 5′ strand resection of DNA double-strand breaks. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17, 1478-1485 (2010).
26. Zhu, Z., Chung, W.H., Shim, E.Y., Lee, S.E. & Ira, G. Sgs1 helicase and two nucleases dna2 and exo1 resect DNA double-strand break ends. Cell 134, 981-994 (2008).
27. Bishop, A.C. et al. A chemical switch for inhibitor-sensitive alleles of any protein kinase. Nature 407, 395-401 (2000).
28. Budd, M.E., Reis, C.C., Smith, S., Myung, K. & Campbell, J.L. Evidence suggesting that Pif1 helicase functions in DNA replication with the Dna2 helicase/nuclease and DNA polymerase delta. Mol. Cell Biol. 26, 2490-2500 (2006).
29. Mimitou, E.P. & Symington, L.S. Ku prevents Exo1 and Sgs1-dependent resection of DNA ends in the absence of a functional MRX complex or Sae2. EMBO J. 29, 3358-3369 (2010).
30. Shim, E.Y. et al. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mre11/Rad50/Xrs2 and Ku proteins regulate association of Exo1 and Dna2 with DNA breaks. EMBO J. 29, 3370-3380 (2010).
31. Ubersax, J.A. et al. Targets of the cyclin-dependent kinase Cdk1. Nature 425, 859-864 (2003). (Pubitemid 37351471)
32. Kosugi, S., Hasebe, M., Tomita, M. & Yanagawa, H. Systematic identification of cell cycle-dependent yeast nucleocytoplasmic shuttling proteins by prediction of composite motifs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 10171-10176 (2009).
33. Din, S., Brill, S.J., Fairman, M.P. & Stillman, B. Cell-cycle-regulated phosphorylation of DNA replication factor A from human and yeast cells. Genes Dev. 4, 968-977 (1990).
34. Mimitou, E.P. & Symington, L.S. Sae2, Exo1 and Sgs1 collaborate in DNA double-strand break processing. Nature 455, 770-774 (2008).
35. Gravel, S., Chapman, J.R., Magill, C. & Jackson, S.P. DNA helicases Sgs1 and BLM promote DNA double-strand break resection. Genes Dev. 22, 2767-2772 (2008).
36. Nimonkar, A.V. et al. BLM-DNA2-RPA-MRN and EXO1-BLM-RPA-MRN constitute two DNA end resection machineries for human DNA break repair. Genes Dev. 25, 350-362 (2011).
37. Hodgson, A. et al. Mre11 and Exo1 contribute to the initiation and processivity of resection at meiotic double-strand breaks made independently of Spo11. DNA Repair (Amst.) 10, 138-148 (2011).
38. Keelagher, R.E., Cotton, V.E., Goldman, A.S. & Borts, R.H. Separable roles for Exonuclease I in meiotic DNA double-strand break repair. DNA Repair (Amst.) 10, 126-137 (2011).
39. Zakharyevich, K. et al. Temporally and biochemically distinct activities of Exo1 during meiosis: double-strand break resection and resolution of double Holliday junctions. Mol. Cell 40, 1001-1015 (2010).
40. Giannattasio, M. et al. Exo1 competes with repair synthesis, converts NER intermediates to long ssDNA gaps, and promotes checkpoint activation. Mol. Cell 40, 50-62 (2010).
41. Cotta-Ramusino, C. et al. Exo1 processes stalled replication forks and counteracts fork reversal in checkpoint-defective cells. Mol. Cell 17, 153-159 (2005). (Pubitemid 40075374)
42. Budd, M.E. et al. A Network of Multi-Tasking Proteins at the DNA Replication Fork Preserves Genome Stability. PLoS Genet. 1, e61 (2005).
43. Church, G.M. & Gilbert, W. Genomic sequencing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81, 1991-1995 (1984). (Pubitemid 14146592)
44. Ira, G., Malkova, A., Liberi, G., Foiani, M. & Haber, J.E. Srs2 and Sgs1-Top3 suppress crossovers during double-strand break repair in yeast. Cell 115, 401-411 (2003). (Pubitemid 37456803)
45. Sugawara, N., Wang, X. & Haber, J.E. In vivo roles of Rad52, Rad54, and Rad55 proteins in Rad51-mediated recombination. Mol. Cell 12, 209-219 (2003). (Pubitemid 36945046)
46. Loog, M. & Morgan, D.O. Cyclin specificity in the phosphorylation of cyclin-dependent kinase substrates. Nature 434, 104-108 (2005). (Pubitemid 40349393)