Dissection of Rad9 BRCT domain function in the mitotic checkpoint response to telomere uncapping

DNA Repair

Volumn 8, Issue 12, 2009, Pages 1452-1461

  Nnakwe, Chinonye C ^a   Altaf, Mohammed ^b   Côté, Jacques ^b   Kron, Stephen J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

BRCT; cdc13 1; Cell cycle checkpoint; H2A phosphorylation; Telomere

Indexed keywords

HISTONE H2A; NOCODAZOLE; PROTEIN RAD9; SINGLE STRANDED DNA;

ARTICLE; CARCINOGENESIS; CELL CYCLE; CHROMATIN; CHROMATIN IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; DNA DAMAGE; DNA PROTEIN COMPLEX; DNA STRAND BREAKAGE; FLOW CYTOMETRY; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; MITOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; TELOMERE; YEAST;

AMINO ACID MOTIFS; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CHROMATIN; DNA DAMAGE; HUMANS; MITOSIS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PHOSPHOSERINE; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; TELOMERE;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 70450221911     PISSN: 15687864     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2009.09.010     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. Harrison J.C., and Haber J.E. Surviving the breakup: the DNA damage checkpoint. Annu. Rev. Genet. 40 (2006) 209-235
2. Melo J., and Toczyski D. A unified view of the DNA-damage checkpoint. Curr. Opin. Cell. Biol. 14 (2002) 237-245
3. McGowan C.H., and Russell P. The DNA damage response: sensing and signaling. Curr. Opin. Cell. Biol. 16 (2004) 629-633
4. Lisby M., Barlow J.H., Burgess R.C., and Rothstein R. Choreography of the DNA damage response: spatiotemporal relationships among checkpoint and repair proteins. Cell 118 (2004) 699-713
5. Nakada D., Matsumoto K., and Sugimoto K. ATM-related Tel1 associates with double-strand breaks through an Xrs2-dependent mechanism. Genes Dev. 17 (2003) 1957-1962
6. Redon C., Pilch D.R., Rogakou E.P., Orr A.H., Lowndes N.F., and Bonner W.M. Yeast histone 2A serine 129 is essential for the efficient repair of checkpoint-blind DNA damage. EMBO Rep. 4 (2003) 678-684
7. Huyen Y., Zgheib O., Ditullio Jr. R.A., Gorgoulis V.G., Zacharatos P., Petty T.J., Sheston E.A., Mellert H.S., Stavridi E.S., and Halazonetis T.D. Methylated lysine 79 of histone H3 targets 53BP1 to DNA double-strand breaks. Nature 432 (2004) 406-411
8. Wysocki R., Javaheri A., Allard S., Sha F., Cote J., and Kron S.J. Role of Dot1-dependent histone H3 methylation in G1 and S phase DNA damage checkpoint functions of Rad9. Mol. Cell Biol. 25 (2005) 8430-8443
9. Hammet A., Magill C., Heierhorst J., and Jackson S.P. Rad9 BRCT domain interaction with phosphorylated H2AX regulates the G1 checkpoint in budding yeast. EMBO Rep. 8 (2007) 851-857
10. Javaheri A., Wysocki R., Jobin-Robitaille O., Altaf M., Cote J., and Kron S.J. Yeast G1 DNA damage checkpoint regulation by H2A phosphorylation is independent of chromatin remodeling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103 (2006) 13771-13776
11. Zou L., Liu D., and Elledge S.J. Replication protein A-mediated recruitment and activation of Rad17 complexes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100 (2003) 13827-13832
12. Paciotti V., Clerici M., Lucchini G., and Longhese M.P. The checkpoint protein Ddc2, functionally related to S. pombe Rad26, interacts with Mec1 and is regulated by Mec1-dependent phosphorylation in budding yeast. Genes Dev. 14 (2000) 2046-2059
13. Rouse J., and Jackson S.P. LCD1: an essential gene involved in checkpoint control and regulation of the MEC1 signalling pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 19 (2000) 5801-5812
14. Wakayama T., Kondo T., Ando S., Matsumoto K., and Sugimoto K. Pie1, a protein interacting with Mec1, controls cell growth and checkpoint responses in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell Biol. 21 (2001) 755-764
15. Majka J., Niedziela-Majka A., and Burgers P.M. The checkpoint clamp activates Mec1 kinase during initiation of the DNA damage checkpoint. Mol. Cell 24 (2006) 891-901
16. Schwartz M.F., Duong J.K., Sun Z., Morrow J.S., Pradhan D., and Stern D.F. Rad9 phosphorylation sites couple Rad53 to the Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA damage checkpoint. Mol. Cell 9 (2002) 1055-1065
17. Sun Z., Hsiao J., Fay D.S., and Stern D.F. Rad53 FHA domain associated with phosphorylated Rad9 in the DNA damage checkpoint. Science 281 (1998) 272-274
18. Gilbert C.S., Green C.M., and Lowndes N.F. Budding yeast Rad9 is an ATP-dependent Rad53 activating machine. Mol. Cell 8 (2001) 129-136
19. Luger K., Mader A.W., Richmond R.K., Sargent D.F., and Richmond T.J. Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 A resolution. Nature 389 (1997) 251-260
20. White C.L., Suto R.K., and Luger K. Structure of the yeast nucleosome core particle reveals fundamental changes in internucleosome interactions. EMBO J. 20 (2001) 5207-5218
21. Millar C.B., and Grunstein M. Genome-wide patterns of histone modifications in yeast. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 7 (2006) 657-666
22. Vidanes G.M., Bonilla C.Y., and Toczyski D.P. Complicated tails: histone modifications and the DNA damage response. Cell 121 (2005) 973-976
23. Peterson C.L., and Cote J. Cellular machineries for chromosomal DNA repair. Genes Dev. 18 (2004) 602-616
24. Foster E.R., and Downs J.A. Histone H2A phosphorylation in DNA double-strand break repair. FEBS J. 272 (2005) 3231-3240
25. Chambers A.L., and Downs J.A. The contribution of the budding yeast histone H2A C-terminal tail to DNA-damage responses. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 35 (2007) 1519-1524
26. van Attikum H., and Gasser S.M. The histone code at DNA breaks: a guide to repair?. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 6 (2005) 757-765
27. Bilsland E., and Downs J.A. Tails of histones in DNA double-strand break repair. Mutagenesis 20 (2005) 153-163
28. Redon C., Pilch D., Rogakou E., Sedelnikova O., Newrock K., and Bonner W. Histone H2A variants H2AX and H2AZ. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 12 (2002) 162-169
29. Burma S., Chen B.P., Murphy M., Kurimasa A., and Chen D.J. ATM phosphorylates histone H2AX in response to DNA double-strand breaks. J. Biol. Chem. 276 (2001) 42462-42467
30. Rogakou E.P., Pilch D.R., Orr A.H., Ivanova V.S., and Bonner W.M. DNA double-stranded breaks induce histone H2AX phosphorylation on serine 139. J. Biol. Chem. 273 (1998) 5858-5868
31. Rogakou E.P., Boon C., Redon C., and Bonner W.M. Megabase chromatin domains involved in DNA double-strand breaks in vivo. J. Cell Biol. 146 (1999) 905-916
32. Downs J.A., Allard S., Jobin-Robitaille O., Javaheri A., Auger A., Bouchard N., Kron S.J., Jackson S.P., and Cote J. Binding of chromatin-modifying activities to phosphorylated histone H2A at DNA damage sites. Mol. Cell 16 (2004) 979-990
33. Shroff R., Arbel-Eden A., Pilch D., Ira G., Bonner W.M., Petrini J.H., Haber J.E., and Lichten M. Distribution and dynamics of chromatin modification induced by a defined DNA double-strand break. Curr. Biol. 14 (2004) 1703-1711
34. Fink M., Imholz D., and Thoma F. Contribution of the serine 129 of histone H2A to chromatin structure. Mol. Cell Biol. 27 (2007) 3589-3600
35. Downs J.A., Lowndes N.F., and Jackson S.P. A role for Saccharomyces cerevisiae histone H2A in DNA repair. Nature 408 (2000) 1001-1004
36. Celeste A., Petersen S., Romanienko P.J., Fernandez-Capetillo O., Chen H.T., Sedelnikova O.A., Reina-San-Martin B., Coppola V., Meffre E., Difilippantonio M.J., Redon C., Pilch D.R., Olaru A., Eckhaus M., Camerini-Otero R.D., Tessarollo L., Livak F., Manova K., Bonner W.M., Nussenzweig M.C., and Nussenzweig A. Genomic instability in mice lacking histone H2AX. Science 296 (2002) 922-927
37. Stewart G.S., Wang B., Bignell C.R., Taylor A.M., and Elledge S.J. MDC1 is a mediator of the mammalian DNA damage checkpoint. Nature 421 (2003) 961-966
38. Nakamura T.M., Du L.L., Redon C., and Russell P. Histone H2A phosphorylation controls Crb2 recruitment at DNA breaks, maintains checkpoint arrest, and influences DNA repair in fission yeast. Mol. Cell Biol. 24 (2004) 6215-6230
39. Lydall D., and Weinert T. Use of cdc13-1-induced DNA damage to study effects of checkpoint genes on DNA damage processing. Methods Enzymol. 283 (1997) 410-424
40. Lydall D. Hiding at the ends of yeast chromosomes: telomeres, nucleases and checkpoint pathways. J. Cell Sci. 116 (2003) 4057-4065
41. Kanoh J., and Ishikawa F. Composition and conservation of the telomeric complex. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 60 (2003) 2295-2302
42. Smogorzewska A., and de Lange T. Regulation of telomerase by telomeric proteins. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 73 (2004) 177-208
43. Blasco M.A. The epigenetic regulation of mammalian telomeres. Nat. Rev. Genet. 8 (2007) 299-309
44. Lydall D., and Weinert T. G2/M checkpoint genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: further evidence for roles in DNA replication and/or repair. Mol. Gen. Genet. 256 (1997) 638-651
45. Nugent C.I., Hughes T.R., Lue N.F., and Lundblad V. Cdc13p: a single-strand telomeric DNA-binding protein with a dual role in yeast telomere maintenance. Science 274 (1996) 249-252
46. Garvik B., Carson M., and Hartwell L. Single-stranded DNA arising at telomeres in cdc13 mutants may constitute a specific signal for the RAD9 checkpoint. Mol. Cell Biol. 15 (1995) 6128-6138
47. Vodenicharov M.D., and Wellinger R.J. DNA degradation at unprotected telomeres in yeast is regulated by the CDK1 (Cdc28/Clb) cell-cycle kinase. Mol. Cell 24 (2006) 127-137
48. Grandin N., Damon C., and Charbonneau M. Cdc13 prevents telomere uncapping and Rad50-dependent homologous recombination. EMBO J. 20 (2001) 6127-6139
49. Jia X., Weinert T., and Lydall D. Mec1 and Rad53 inhibit formation of single-stranded DNA at telomeres of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cdc13-1 mutants. Genetics 166 (2004) 753-764
50. Weinert T.A., Kiser G.L., and Hartwell L.H. Mitotic checkpoint genes in budding yeast and the dependence of mitosis on DNA replication and repair. Genes Dev. 8 (1994) 652-665
51. Lydall D., and Weinert T. Yeast checkpoint genes in DNA damage processing: implications for repair and arrest. Science 270 (1995) 1488-1491
52. Sanchez Y., Bachant J., Wang H., Hu F., Liu D., Tetzlaff M., and Elledge S.J. Control of the DNA damage checkpoint by chk1 and rad53 protein kinases through distinct mechanisms. Science 286 (1999) 1166-1171
53. Addinall S.G., Downey M., Yu M., Zubko M.K., Dewar J., Leake A., Hallinan J., Shaw O., James K., Wilkinson D.J., Wipat A., Durocher D., and Lydall D. A genomewide suppressor and enhancer analysis of cdc13-1 reveals varied cellular processes influencing telomere capping in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 180 (2008) 2251-2266
54. Toh G.W., and Lowndes N.F. Role of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad9 protein in sensing and responding to DNA damage. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 31 (2003) 242-246
55. Weinert T.A., and Hartwell L.H. Cell cycle arrest of cdc mutants and specificity of the RAD9 checkpoint. Genetics 134 (1993) 63-80
56. Zubko M.K., Guillard S., and Lydall D. Exo1 and Rad24 differentially regulate generation of ssDNA at telomeres of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cdc13-1 mutants. Genetics 168 (2004) 103-115
57. Lazzaro F., Sapountzi V., Granata M., Pellicioli A., Vaze M., Haber J.E., Plevani P., Lydall D., and Muzi-Falconi M. Histone methyltransferase Dot1 and Rad9 inhibit single-stranded DNA accumulation at DSBs and uncapped telomeres. EMBO J. 27 (2008) 1502-1512
58. Foster S.S., Zubko M.K., Guillard S., and Lydall D. MRX protects telomeric DNA at uncapped telomeres of budding yeast cdc13-1 mutants. DNA Repair (Amst) 5 (2006) 840-851
59. Booth C., Griffith E., Brady G., and Lydall D. Quantitative amplification of single-stranded DNA (QAOS) demonstrates that cdc13-1 mutants generate ssDNA in a telomere to centromere direction. Nucleic Acids Res. 29 (2001) 4414-4422
60. Tsolou A., and Lydall D. Mrc1 protects uncapped budding yeast telomeres from exonuclease EXO1. DNA Repair (Amst.) 6 (2007) 1607-1617
61. Soulier J., and Lowndes N.F. The BRCT domain of the S. cerevisiae checkpoint protein Rad9 mediates a Rad9-Rad9 interaction after DNA damage. Curr. Biol. 9 (1999) 551-554
62. Usui T., Foster S.S., and Petrini J.H. Maintenance of the DNA-damage checkpoint requires DNA-damage-induced mediator protein oligomerization. Mol. Cell 33 (2009) 147-159
63. Botuyan M.V., Lee J., Ward I.M., Kim J.E., Thompson J.R., Chen J., and Mer G. Structural basis for the methylation state-specific recognition of histone H4-K20 by 53BP1 and Crb2 in DNA repair. Cell 127 (2006) 1361-1373
64. Raths S.K., Naider F., and Becker J.M. Peptide analogues compete with the binding of alpha-factor to its receptor in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 263 (1988) 17333-17341
65. Notredame C., Higgins D.G., and Heringa J. T-Coffee: a novel method for fast and accurate multiple sequence alignment. J. Mol. Biol. 302 (2000) 205-217
66. Stucki M., Clapperton J.A., Mohammad D., Yaffe M.B., Smerdon S.J., and Jackson S.P. MDC1 directly binds phosphorylated histone H2AX to regulate cellular responses to DNA double-strand breaks. Cell 123 (2005) 1213-1226
67. Wu S., Skolnick J., and Zhang Y. Ab initio modeling of small proteins by iterative TASSER simulations. BMC Biol. 5 (2007) 17
68. Zhang Y. Template-based modeling and free modeling by I-TASSER in CASP7. Proteins 69 Suppl. 8 (2007) 108-117
69. Zhang Y. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics 9 (2008) 40
70. Guex N., and Peitsch M.C. SWISS-MODEL and the Swiss-PdbViewer: an environment for comparative protein modeling. Electrophoresis 18 (1997) 2714-2723
71. Kilkenny M.L., Dore A.S., Roe S.M., Nestoras K., Ho J.C., Watts F.Z., and Pearl L.H. Structural and functional analysis of the Crb2-BRCT2 domain reveals distinct roles in checkpoint signaling and DNA damage repair. Genes Dev. 22 (2008) 2034-2047
72. Lee J.C., Field D.J., and Lee L.L. Effects of nocodazole on structures of calf brain tubulin. Biochemistry 19 (1980) 6209-6215
73. Straight A.F., and Murray A.W. The spindle assembly checkpoint in budding yeast. Methods Enzymol. 283 (1997) 425-440
74. Toh G.W., O'Shaughnessy A.M., Jimeno S., Dobbie I.M., Grenon M., Maffini S., O'Rorke A., and Lowndes N.F. Histone H2A phosphorylation and H3 methylation are required for a novel Rad9 DSB repair function following checkpoint activation. DNA Repair (Amst.) 5 (2006) 693-703
75. Grenon M., Costelloe T., Jimeno S., O'Shaughnessy A., Fitzgerald J., Zgheib O., Degerth L., and Lowndes N.F. Docking onto chromatin via the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad9 Tudor domain. Yeast 24 (2007) 105-119
76. McSherry T.D., Kitazono A.A., Javaheri A., Kron S.J., and Mueller P.R. Non-catalytic function for ATR in the checkpoint response. Cell Cycle 6 (2007) 2019-2030
77. Clemenson C., and Marsolier-Kergoat M.C. The spindle assembly checkpoint regulates the phosphorylation state of a subset of DNA checkpoint proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell Biol. 26 (2006) 9149-9161
78. Krishnan V., and Surana U. Taming the spindle for containing the chromosomes. Cell Cycle 4 (2005) 376-379
79. Kim J.A., Kruhlak M., Dotiwala F., Nussenzweig A., and Haber J.E. Heterochromatin is refractory to gamma-H2AX modification in yeast and mammals. J. Cell Biol. 178 (2007) 209-218
80. Ng H.H., Ciccone D.N., Morshead K.B., Oettinger M.A., and Struhl K. Lysine-79 of histone H3 is hypomethylated at silenced loci in yeast and mammalian cells: a potential mechanism for position-effect variegation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100 (2003) 1820-1825
81. Naiki T., Wakayama T., Nakada D., Matsumoto K., and Sugimoto K. Association of Rad9 with double-strand breaks through a Mec1-dependent mechanism. Mol. Cell Biol. 24 (2004) 3277-3285
82. Bonilla C.Y., Melo J.A., and Toczyski D.P. Colocalization of sensors is sufficient to activate the DNA damage checkpoint in the absence of damage. Mol. Cell 30 (2008) 267-276
83. Zgheib O., Pataky K., Brugger J., and Halazonetis T.D. An oligomerized 53BP1 tudor domain suffices for recognition of DNA double-strand breaks. Mol. Cell Biol. 29 (2009) 1050-1058
84. Shim E.Y., Hong S.J., Oum J.H., Yanez Y., Zhang Y., and Lee S.E. RSC mobilizes nucleosomes to improve accessibility of repair machinery to the damaged chromatin. Mol. Cell Biol. 27 (2007) 1602-1613
85. Liang B., Qiu J., Ratnakumar K., and Laurent B.C. RSC functions as an early double-strand-break sensor in the cell's response to DNA damage. Curr. Biol. 17 (2007) 1432-1437
86. Thomas B.J., and Rothstein R. Elevated recombination rates in transcriptionally active DNA. Cell 56 (1989) 619-630