The Mre11 nuclease is not required for 5′ to 3′ resection at multiple HO-induced double-strand breaks

Molecular and Cellular Biology

Volumn 24, Issue 21, 2004, Pages 9682-9694

  Llorente, Bertrand ^a   Symington, Lorraine S ^a  

^a NewYork Presbyterian Hospital   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DOUBLE STRANDED DNA; ENDONUCLEASE; EXONUCLEASE; MRE11 PROTEIN; PHLEOMYCIN; SINGLE STRANDED DNA;

ALLELE; ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME; CONCENTRATION RESPONSE; DNA DAMAGE; DNA STRAND BREAKAGE; ENZYME SUBSTRATE; FUNGAL STRAIN; IONIZING RADIATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOSENSITIVITY; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

CHROMOSOMES, FUNGAL; DEOXYRIBONUCLEASES, TYPE II SITE-SPECIFIC; DNA DAMAGE; DNA, FUNGAL; DNA, SINGLE-STRANDED; ENDODEOXYRIBONUCLEASES; ESTERASES; EXODEOXYRIBONUCLEASES; GENOME, FUNGAL; KINETICS; LYSINE; MUTATION; PHLEOMYCINS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

SACCHAROMYCES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 6344254299     PISSN: 02707306     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.24.21.9682-9694.2004     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Alani, E., R. Padmore, and N. Kleckner. 1990. Analysis of wild-type and rad50 mutants of yeast suggests an intimate relationship between meiotic chromosome synapsis and recombination. Cell 61:419-436.
2. Amundsen, S. K., and G. R. Smith. 2003. Interchangeable parts of the Escherichia coli recombination machinery. Cell 112:741-744.
3. Aylon, Y., and M. Kupiec. 2003. The checkpoint protein Rad24 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is involved in processing double-strand break ends and in recombination partner choice. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23:6585-6596.
4. Aylon, Y., B. Liefshitz, G. Bitan-Banin, and M. Kupiec. 2003. Molecular dissection of mitotic recombination in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23:1403-1417.
5. Bartsch, S., L. E. Kang, and L. S. Symington. 2000. RAD51 is required for the repair of plasmid double-stranded DNA gaps from either plasmid or chromosomal templates. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:1194-1205.
6. Ben-Aroya, S., P. A. Mieczkowski, T. D. Petes, and M. Kupiec. 2004. The compact chromatin structure of a Ty repeated sequence suppresses recombination hotspot activity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell 15:221-231.
7. Bennett, C. B., L. K. Lewis, G. Karthikeyan, K. S. Lobachev, Y. H. Jin, J. F. Sterling, J. R. Snipe, and M. A. Resnick. 2001. Genes required for ionizing radiation resistance in yeast. Nat. Genet. 29:426-434.
8. Bergerat, A., B. de Massy, D. Gadelle, P. C. Varoutas, A. Nicolas, and P. Forterre. 1997. An atypical topoisomerase II from Archaea with implications for meiotic recombination. Nature 386:414-417.
9. Boulton, S. J., and S. P. Jackson. 1998. Components of the Ku-dependent non-homologous end-joining pathway are involved in telomeric length maintenance and telomeric silencing. EMBO J. 17:1819-1828.
10. Carney, J. P., R. S. Maser, H. Olivares, E. M. Davis, M. Le Beau, J. R. Yates III, L. Hays, W. F. Morgan, and J. H. Petrini. 1998. The hMre11/hRad50 protein complex and Nijmegen breakage syndrome: linkage of double-strand break repair to the cellular DNA damage response. Cell 93:477-486.
11. Chen, L., K. Trujillo, W. Ramos, P. Sung, and A. E. Tomkinson. 2001. Promotion of Dn14-catalyzed DNA end-joining by the Rad50/Mre11/Xrs2 and Hdf1/Hdf2 complexes. Mol. Cell 8:1105-1115.
12. Connelly, J. C., E. S. de Leau, and D. R. Leach. 2003. Nucleolytic processing of a protein-bound DNA end by the E. coli SbcCD (MR) complex. DNA Repair 2:795-807.
13. Connelly, J. C., L. A. Kirkham, and D. R. Leach. 1998. The SbcCD nuclease of Escherichia coli is a structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) family protein that cleaves hairpin DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:7969-7974.
14. Connelly, J. C., and D. R. Leach. 2004. Repair of DNA covalently linked to protein. Mol. Cell 13:307-316.
15. Curcio, M. J., and D. J. Garfinkel. 1991. Single-step selection for Ty1 element retrotransposition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:936-940.
16. D'Amours, D., and S. P. Jackson. 2001. The yeast Xrs2 complex functions in S phase checkpoint regulation. Genes Dev. 15:2238-2249.
17. Darlow, J. M., and D. R. Leach. 1998. Evidence for two preferred hairpin folding patterns in d(CGG).d(CCG) repeat tracts in vivo. J. Mol. Biol. 275:17-23.
18. Davis, A. P., and L. S. Symington. 2004. RAD51-dependent break-induced replication in yeast. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24:2344-2351.
19. Diede, S. J., and D. E. Gottschling. 1999. Telomerase-mediated telomere addition in vivo requires DNA primase and DNA polymerases alpha and delta. Cell 99:723-733.
20. Dolganov, G. M., R. S. Maser, A. Novikov, L. Tosto, S. Chong, D. A. Bressan, and J. H. Petrini. 1996. Human Rad50 is physically associated with human Mre11: identification of a conserved multiprotein complex implicated in recombinational DNA repair. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:4832-4841.
21. Ellison, V., and B. Stillman. 2003. Biochemical characterization of DNA damage checkpoint complexes: clamp loader and clamp complexes with specificity for 5′ recessed DNA. PLoS Biol. 1:E33. [Online.] http://biology-. plosjournals.org.
22. Fasullo, M., P. Giallanza, Z. Dong, C. Cera, and T. Bennett. 2001. Saccharomyces cerevisiae rad51 mutants are defective in DNA damage-associated sister chromatid exchanges but exhibit increased rates of homology-directed translocations. Genetics 158:959-972.
23. Fiorentini, P., K. N. Huang, D. X. Tishkoff, R. D. Kolodner, and L. S. Symington. 1997. Exonuclease I of Saccharomyces cerevisiae functions in mitotic recombination in vivo and in vitro. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:2764-2773.
24. Frank-Vaillant, M., and S. Marcand. 2002. Transient stability of DNA ends allows nonhomologous end joining to precede homologous recombination. Mol. Cell 10:1189-1199.
25. Furuse, M., Y. Nagase, H. Tsubouchi, K. Murakami-Murofushi, T. Shibata, and K. Ohta. 1998. Distinct roles of two separable in vitro activities of yeast Mre11 in mitotic and meiotic recombination. EMBO J. 17:6412-6425.
26. Game, J. C., and R. K. Mortimer. 1974. A genetic study of x-ray sensitive mutants in yeast. Mutat. Res. 24:281-292.
27. Grenon, M., C. Gilbert, and N. F. Lowndes. 2001. Checkpoint activation in response to double-strand breaks requires the Mre11/Rad50/Xrs2 complex. Nat. Cell Biol. 3:844-847.
28. Haber, J. E., and W. Y. Leung. 1996. Lack of chromosome territoriality in yeast: promiscuous rejoining of broken chromosome ends. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:13949-13954.
29. Hackett, J. A., and C. W. Greider. 2003. End resection initiates genomic instability in the absence of telomerase. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23:8450-8461.
30. Henner, W. D., L. O. Rodriguez, S. M. Hecht, and W. A. Haseltine. 1983. Gamma ray induced deoxyribonucleic acid strand breaks. 3′ glycolate termini. J. Biol. Chem. 258:711-713.
31. Ivanov, E. L., N. Sugawara, C. I. White, F. Fahre, and J. E. Haber. 1994. Mutations in XRS2 and RAD50 delay but do not prevent mating-type switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:3414-3425.
32. Keeney, S., C. N. Giroux, and N. Kleckner. 1997. Meiosis-specific DNA double-strand breaks are catalyzed by Spo11, a member of a widely conserved protein family. Cell 88:375-384.
33. Kim, J. M., S. Vanguri, J. D. Boeke, A. Gabriel, and D. F. Voytas. 1998. Transposable elements and genome organization: a comprehensive survey of retrotransposons revealed by the complete Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome sequence. Genome Res. 8:464-478.
34. Kironmai, K. M., and K. Muniyappa. 1997. Alteration of telomeric sequences and senescence caused by mutations in RAD50 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Cells 2:443-455.
35. Kraus, E., W. Y. Leung, and J. E. Haber. 2001. Break-induced replication: a review and an example in budding yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:8255-8262.
36. Lee, S. E., D. A. Bressan, J. H. Petrini, and J. E. Haber. 2002. Complementation between N-terminal Saccharomyces cerevisiae mre11 alleles in DNA repair and telomere length maintenance. DNA Repair 1:27-40.
37. 2/M arrest after DNA damage. Cell 94:399-409.
38. Lewis, L. K., G. Karthikeyan, J. W. Westmorland, and M. A. Resnick. 2002. Differential suppression of DNA repair deficiencies of yeast rad50, mre11 and xrs2 mutants by EXO1 and TLC1 (the RNA component of telomerase). Genetics 160:49-62.
39. Lisby, M., R. Rothstein, and U. H. Mortensen. 2001. Rad52 forms DNA repair and recombination centers during S phase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:8276-8282.
40. Lobachev, K. S., D. A. Gordenin, and M. A. Resnick. 2002. The Mre11 complex is required for repair of hairpin-capped double-strand breaks and prevention of chromosome rearrangements. Cell 108:183-193.
41. Malkova, A., F. Klein, W. Y. Leung, and J. E. Haber. 2000. HO endonuclease-induced recombination in yeast meiosis resembles Spoil-induced events. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:14500-14505.
42. Maringele, L., and D. Lydall. 2002. EXO1-dependent single-stranded DNA at telomeres activates subsets of DNA damage and spindle checkpoint pathways in budding yeast yku70Δ mutants. Genes Dev. 16:1919-1933.
43. Moore, J. K., and J. E. Haber. 1996. Cell cycle and genetic requirements of two pathways of nonhomologous end-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:2164-2173.
44. Moreau, S., J. R. Ferguson, and L. S. Symington. 1999. The nuclease activity of Mre11 is required for meiosis but not for mating type switching, end joining, or telomere maintenance. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:556-566.
45. Moreau, S., E. A. Morgan, and L. S. Symington. 2001. Overlapping functions of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mre11, Exo1 and Rad27 nucleases in DNA metabolism. Genetics 159:1423-1433.
46. Neale, M. J., M. Ramachandran, E. Trelles-Sticken, H. Scherthan, and A. S. Goldman. 2002. Wild-type levels of Spoil-induced DSBs are required for normal single-strand resection during meiosis. Mol. Cell 9:835-846.
47. Nickoloff, J. A., E. Y. Chen, and F. Heffron. 1986. A 24-base-pair DNA sequence from the MAT locus stimulates intergenic recombination in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83:7831-7835.
48. Nugent, C. I., G. Bosco, L. O. Ross, S. K. Evans, A. P. Salinger, J. K. Moore, J. E. Haber, and V. Lundblad. 1998. Telomere maintenance is dependent on activities required for end repair of double-strand breaks. Curr. Biol. 8:657-660.
49. Parket, A., O. Inbar, and M. Kupiec. 1995. Recombination of Ty elements in yeast can be induced by a double-strand break. Genetics 140:67-77.
50. Pastwa, E., R. D. Neumann, K. Mezhevaya, and T. A. Winters. 2003. Repair of radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks is dependent upon radiation quality and the structural complexity of double-strand breaks. Radiat. Res. 159:251-261.
51. Petrini, J. H. 2000. The Mre11 complex and ATM: collaborating to navigate S phase. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 12:293-296.
52. Pouliot, J. J., K. C. Yao, C. A. Robertson, and H. A. Nash. 1999. Yeast gene for a Tyr-DNA phosphodiesterase that repairs topoisomerase I complexes. Science 286:552-555.
53. Povirk, L. F., Y. H. Han, and R. J. Steighner. 1989. Structure of bleomycin-induced DNA double-strand breaks: predominance of blunt ends and single-base 5′ extensions. Biochemistry 28:5808-5814.
54. Rattray, A. J., C. B. McGill, B. K. Shafer, and J. N. Strathern. 2001. Fidelity of mitotic double-strand-break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a role for SAE2/COM1. Genetics 158:109-122.
55. Sharples, G. J., and D. R. Leach. 1995. Structural and functional similarities between the SbcCD proteins of Escherichia coli and the RAD50 and MRE11 (RAD32) recombination and repair proteins of yeast. Mol. Microbiol. 17:1215-1217.
56. Strunnikov, A. V. 1998. SMC proteins and chromosome structure. Trends Cell Biol. 8:454-459.
57. Sugawara, N., X. Wang, and J. E. Haber. 2003. In vivo roles of Rad52, Rad54, and Rad55 proteins in Rad51-mediated recombination. Mol. Cell 12:209-219.
58. Sun, H., D. Treco, and J. W. Szostak. 1991. Extensive 3′-overhanging, single-stranded DNA associated with the meiosis-specific double-strand breaks at the ARG4 recombination initiation site. Cell 64:1155-1161.
59. Symington, L. S. 2002. Role of RAD52 epistasis group genes in homologous recombination and double-strand break repair. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 66:630-670.
60. Symington, L. S., L. E. Kang, and S. Moreau. 2000. Alteration of gene conversion tract length and associated crossing over during plasmid gap repair in nuclease-deficient strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res. 28:4649-4656.
61. Szankasi, P., and G. R. Smith. 1992. A DNA exonuclease induced during meiosis of Schizosaccharomyces pombe. J. Biol. Chem. 267:3014-3023.
62. Tishkoff, D. X., A. L. Boerger, P. Bertrand, N. Filosi, G. M. Gaida, M. F. Kane, and R. D. Kolodner. 1997. Identification and characterization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae EXO1, a gene encoding an exonuclease that interacts with MSH2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:7487-7492.
63. Trujillo, K. M., D. H. Roh, L. Chen, S. Van Komen, A. Tomkinson, and P. Sung. 2003. Yeast xrs2 binds DNA and helps target rad50 and mre11 to DNA ends. J. Biol. Chem. 278:48957-48964.
64. Trujillo, K. M., and P. Sung. 2001. DNA structure-specific nuclease activities in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad50*Mre11 complex. J. Biol. Chem. 276:35458-35464.
65. Tsubouchi, H., and H. Ogawa. 2000. Exo1 roles for repair of DNA double-strand breaks and meiotic crossing over in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol. Cell 11:2221-2233.
66. Tsubouchi, H., and H. Ogawa. 1998. A novel mre11 mutation impairs processing of double-strand breaks of DNA during both mitosis and meiosis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18:260-268.
67. Usui, T., T. Ohta, H. Oshiumi, J. Tomizawa, H. Ogawa, and T. Ogawa. 1998. Complex formation and functional versatility of Mre11 of budding yeast in recombination. Cell 95:705-716.
68. Ward, J. F. 2000. Complexity of damage produced by ionizing radiation. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 65:377-382.
69. Ward, J. F. 1981. Some biochemical consequences of the spatial distribution of ionizing radiation-produced free radicals. Radiat. Res. 86:185-195.
70. White, C. I., and J. E. Haber. 1990. Intermediates of recombination during mating type switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 9:663-673.
71. Yu, J., K. Marshall, M. Yamaguchi, J. E. Haber, and C. F. Weil. 2004. Microhomology-dependent end joining and repair of transposon-induced DNA hairpins by host factors in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24:1351-1364.
72. Yu, X., and A. Gabriel. 2004. Reciprocal translocations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae formed by nonhomologous end joining. Genetics 166:741-751.