Break dosage, cell cycle stage and DNA replication influence DNA double strand break response

EMBO Journal

Volumn 27, Issue 13, 2008, Pages 1875-1885

  Zierhut, Christian ^a,b   Diffley, John F X ^a  

^a IMPERIAL CANCER RESEARCH FUND   (United Kingdom)

^b ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cell cycle; Checkpoints; DNA damage; DNA replication

Indexed keywords

DOUBLE STRANDED DNA; ENDONUCLEASE; SINGLE STRANDED DNA;

ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE G1 PHASE; CELL CYCLE PHASE; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; DNA STRAND BREAKAGE; DOSE RESPONSE; ENZYME DEGRADATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

DNA BREAKS, DOUBLE-STRANDED; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; GENES, CDC; MITOSIS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCETALES;

EID: 46949098616     PISSN: 02614189     EISSN: 14602075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/emboj.2008.111     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Aboussekhra A, Vialard JE, Morrison DE, de la Torre-Ruiz MA, Cernakova L, Fabre F, Lowndes NF (1996) A novel role for the budding yeast RAD9 checkpoint gene in DNA damage-dependent transcription. EMBO J 15: 3912-3922
2. Alcasabas AA, Osborn AJ, Bachant J, Hu F, Werler PJ, Bousset K, Furuya K, Diffley JF, Carr AM, Elledge SJ (2001) Mrc1 transduces signals of DNA replication stress to activate Rad53. Nat Cell Biol 3: 958-965
3. Aylon Y, Liefshitz B, Bitan-Banin G, Kupiec M (2003) Molecular dissection of mitotic recombination in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 23: 1403-1417
4. Aylon Y, Liefshitz B, Kupiec M (2004) The CDK regulates repair of double-strand breaks by homologous recombination during the cell cycle. EMBO J 23: 4868-4875
5. Barlow JH, Lisby M, Rothstein R (2008) Differential regulation of the cellular response to DNA double-strand breaks in G1. Mol Cell 30: 73-85
6. Booth C, Griffith E, Brady G, Lydall D (2001) Quantitative amplification of single-stranded DNA (QAOS) demonstrates that cdc13-1 mutants generate ssDNA in a telomere to centromere direction. Nucleic Acids Res 29: 4414-4422
7. D'Amours D, Jackson SP (2002) The Mre11 complex: at the crossroads of DNA repair and checkpoint signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 3: 317-327
8. Daley JM, Palmbos PL, Wu D, Wilson TE (2005) Nonhomologous end joining in yeast. Annu Rev Genet 39: 431-451
9. Daley JM, Wilson TE (2005) Rejoining of DNA double-strand breaks as a function of overhang length. Mol Cell Biol 25: 896-906
10. De Sanctis V, Bertozzi C, Costanzo G, Di Mauro E, Negri R (2001) Cell cycle arrest determines the intensity of the global transcriptional response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to ionizing radiation. Radiat Res 156: 379-387
11. Diffley JF, Bousset K, Labib K, Noton EA, Santocanale C, Tercero JA (2000) Coping with and recovering from hydroxyurea-induced replication fork arrest in budding yeast. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 65: 333-342
12. Diffley JF, Cocker JH, Dowell SJ, Rowley A (1994) Two steps in the assembly of complexes at yeast replication origins in vivo. Cell 78: 303-316
13. Fishman-Lobell J, Rudin N, Haber JE (1992) Two alternative pathways of double-strand break repair that are kinetically separable and independently modulated. Mol Cell Biol 12: 1292-1303
14. Frank-Vaillant M, Marcand S (2002) Transient stability of DNA ends allows nonhomologous end joining to precede homologous recombination. Mol Cell 10: 1189-1199
15. Garvik B, Carson M, Hartwell L (1995) Single-stranded DNA arising at telomeres in cdc13 mutants may constitute a specific signal for the RAD9 checkpoint. Mol Cell Biol 15: 6128-6138
16. Guldener U, Heck S, Fielder T, Beinhauer J, Hegemann JH (1996) A new efficient gene disruption cassette for repeated use in budding yeast. Nucleic Acids Res 24: 2519-2524
17. Haber JE (1998) Mating-type gene switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Annu Rev Genet 32: 561-599
18. Haber JE (2002) Uses and abuses of HO endonuclease. Methods Enzymol 350: 141-164
19. Heid CA, Stevens J, Livak KJ, Williams PM (1996) Real time quantitative PCR. Genome Res 6: 986-994
20. Hoeijmakers JH (2001) Genome maintenance mechanisms for preventing cancer. Nature 411: 366-374
21. Ira G, Pellicioli A, Balijja A, Wang X, Fiorani S, Carotenuto W, Liberi G, Bressan D, Wan L, Hollingsworth NM, Haber JE, Foiani M (2004) DNA end resection, homologous recombination and DNA damage checkpoint activation require CDK1. Nature 431: 1011-1017
22. Katou Y, Kanoh Y, Bando M, Noguchi H, Tanaka H, Ashikari T, Sugimoto K, Shirahige K (2003) S-phase checkpoint proteins Tof1 and Mrc1 form a stable replication-pausing complex. Nature 424: 1078-1083
23. Kelly TJ, Martin GS, Forsburg SL, Stephen RJ, Russo A, Nurse P (1993) The fission yeast cdc18+ gene product couples S phase to START and mitosis. Cell 74: 371-382
24. Lee SE, Moore JK, Holmes A, Umezu K, Kolodner RD, Haber JE (1998) Saccharomyces Ku70, mre11/rad50 and RPA proteins regulate adaptation to G2/M arrest after DNA damage. Cell 94: 399-409
25. Lengsfeld BM, Rattray AJ, Bhaskara V, Ghirlando R, Paull TT (2007) Sae2 is an endonuclease that processes hairpin DNA cooperatively with the Mre11/Rad50/Xrs2 complex. Mol Cell 28: 638-651
26. Liang C, Stillman B (1997) Persistent initiation of DNA replication and chromatin-bound MCM proteins during the cell cycle in cdc6 mutants. Genes Dev 11: 3375-3386
27. Lindahl T, Barnes DE (2000) Repair of endogenous DNA damage. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 65: 127-133
28. Lisby M, Barlow JH, Burgess RC, Rothstein R (2004) Choreography of the DNA damage response: spatiotemporal relationships among checkpoint and repair proteins. Cell 118: 699-713
29. Lisby M, Rothstein R, Mortensen UH (2001) Rad52 forms DNA repair and recombination centers during S phase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 8276-8282
30. Llorente B, Symington LS (2004) The Mre11 nuclease is not required for 5′ to 3′ resection at multiple HO-induced double-strand breaks. Mol Cell Biol 24: 9682-9694
31. Longhese MP, Clerici M, Lucchini G (2003) The S-phase checkpoint and its regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutat Res 532: 41-58
32. Longhese MP, Mantiero D, Clerici M (2006) The cellular response to chromosome breakage. Mol Microbiol 60: 1099-1108
33. Masumoto H, Hawke D, Kobayashi R, Verreault A (2005) A role for cell-cycle-regulated histone H3 lysine 56 acetylation in the DNA damage response. Nature 436: 294-298
34. Melo JA, Cohen J, Toczyski DP (2001) Two checkpoint complexes are independently recruited to sites of DNA damage in vivo. Genes Dev 15: 2809-2821
35. Nasmyth K (1996) At the heart of the budding yeast cell cycle. Trends Genet 12: 405-412
36. O'Connell MJ, Cimprich KA (2005) G2 damage checkpoints: what is the turn-on? J Cell Sci 118: 1-6
37. Paciotti V, Clerici M, Lucchini G, Longhese MP (2000) The checkpoint protein Ddc2, functionally related to S. pombe Rad26, interacts with Mec1 and is regulated by Mec1-dependent phosphorylation in budding yeast. Genes Dev 14: 2046-2059
38. Paques F, Haber JE (1999) Multiple pathways of recombination induced by double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 63: 349-404
39. Pellicioli A, Lee SE, Lucca C, Foiani M, Haber JE (2001) Regulation of Saccharomyces Rad53 checkpoint kinase during adaptation from DNA damage-induced G2/M arrest. Mol Cell 7: 293-300
40. Pellicioli A, Lucca C, Liberi G, Marini F, Lopes M, Plevani P, Romano A, Di Fiore PP, Foiani M (1999) Activation of Rad53 kinase in response to DNA damage and its effect in modulating phosphorylation of the lagging strand DNA polymerase. EMBO J 18: 6561-6572
41. Piatti S, Lengauer C, Nasmyth K (1995) Cdc6 is an unstable protein whose de novo synthesis in G1 is important for the onset of S phase and for preventing a 'reductional' anaphase in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J 14: 3788-3799
42. Rouse J, Jackson SP (2000) LCD1: an essential gene involved in checkpoint control and regulation of the MEC1 signalling pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J 19: 5801-5812
43. Rouse J, Jackson SP (2002) Interfaces between the detection, signaling, and repair of DNA damage. Science 297: 547-551
44. Schar P, Herrmann G, Daly G, Lindahl T (1997) A newly identified DNA ligase of Saccharomyces cerevisiae involved in RAD52-independent repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Genes Dev 11: 1912-1924
45. Shibahara K, Stillman B (1999) Replication-dependent marking of DNA by PCNA facilitates CAF-1-coupled inheritance of chromatin. Cell 96: 575-585
46. Stern BM, Murray AW (2001) Lack of tension at kinetochores activates the spindle checkpoint in budding yeast. Curr Biol 11: 1462-1467
47. Teo SH, Jackson SP (1997) Identification of Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA ligase IV: involvement in DNA double-strand break repair. EMBO J 16: 4788-4795
48. Tercero JA, Labib K, Diffley JF (2000) DNA synthesis at individual replication forks requires the essential initiation factor Cdc45p. EMBO J 19: 2082-2093
49. Tercero JA, Longhese MP, Diffley JF (2003) A central role for DNA replication forks in checkpoint activation and response. Mol Cell 11: 1323-1336
50. Uhlmann F, Nasmyth K (1998) Cohesion between sister chromatids must be established during DNA replication. Curr Biol 8: 1095-1101
51. Vaze MB, Pellicioli A, Lee SE, Ira G, Liberi G, Arbel-Eden A, Foiani M, Haber JE (2002) Recovery from checkpoint-mediated arrest after repair of a double-strand break requires Srs2 helicase. Mol Cell 10: 373-385
52. Weinreich M, Liang C, Stillman B (1999) The Cdc6p nucleotide-binding motif is required for loading mcm proteins onto chromatin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 441-446
53. White CI, Haber JE (1990) Intermediates of recombination during mating type switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J 9: 663-673
54. Wigley DB (2007) RecBCD: the supercar of DNA repair. Cell 131: 651-653
55. Wilson TE, Grawunder U, Lieber MR (1997) Yeast DNA ligase IV mediates non-homologous DNA end joining. Nature 388: 495-498
56. Zou L, Elledge SJ (2003) Sensing DNA damage through ATRIP recognition of RPA-ssDNA complexes. Science 300: 1542-1548
57. Zubko MK, Maringele L, Foster SS, Lydall D (2006) Detecting repair intermediates in vivo: effects of DNA damage response genes on single-stranded DNA accumulation at uncapped telomeres in budding yeast. Methods Enzymol 409: 285-300