The DNA damage checkpoint response to replication stress: A game of forks

Frontiers in Genetics

Volumn 4, Issue MAR, 2013, Pages

  Jossen, Rachel ^a   Bermejo, Rodrigo ^a  

^a CSIC   (Spain)

Author keywords

DNA damage checkpoint; Genomic instability; Mec1 ATR; Oncogene stress; Replication forks

Indexed keywords

EID: 84876162526     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16648021     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2013.00026     Document Type: Review

References (154)

1. Admire, A., Shanks, L., Danzl, N., Wang, M., Weier, U., Stevens, W., et al. (2006). Cycles of chromosome instability are associated with a fragile site and are increased by defects in DNA replication and checkpoint controls in yeast. Genes Dev. 20, 159-173.
2. Alberghina, L., Mavelli, G., Drovandi, G., Palumbo, P., Pessina, S., Tripodi, E, et al. (2012). Cell growth and cell cycle in Saccharomyces cere-visiae: basic regulatory design and protein-protein interaction network. Biotechnol Adv. 30, 52-72.
3. Alcasabas, A. A., Osborn, A. J., Bachant, J., Hu, F., Werler, P. J., Bousset, K., et al. (2001). Mrc1 transduces signals of DNA replication stress to activate Rad53. Nat. Cell Biol. 3, 958-965.
4. Al-Khodairy, F., and Carr, A. M. (1992). DNA repair mutants defining G2 checkpoint pathways in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. EMBO J. 11,1343-1350.
5. Alzu, A., Bermejo, R., Begnis, M., Lucca, C., Piccini, D., Carotenuto, W., et al. (2012). Senataxin associates with replication forks to protect fork integrity across RNA-polymerase-II-transcribed genes. Cell 151, 835-846.
6. Andreson, B. L., Gupta, A., Georgieva, B. P., and Rothstein, R. (2010). The ribonucleotide reductase inhibitor, Sml1, is sequentially phosphorylated, ubiquitylated and degraded in response to DNA damage. Nucleic Acids Res. 38,6490-6501.
7. Azvolinsky, A., Dunaway, S., Torres, J. Z., Bessler, J. B., and Zakian, V. A. (2006). The, S. cerevisiae Rrm3p DNA helicase moves with the replication fork and affects replication of all yeast chromosomes. Genes Dev. 20,3104-3116.
8. Azvolinsky, A., Giresi, P. G., Lieb, J. D., and Zakian, V. A. (2009). Highly transcribed RNA polymerase II genes are impediments to replication fork progression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell 34, 722-734.
9. Bartek, J., Bartkova, J., and Lukas, J. (2007a). DNA damage signalling guards against activated oncogenes and tumour progression. Oncogene 26, 7773-7779.
10. Bartek, J., Lukas, J., and Bartkova, J. (2007b). DNA damage response as an anti-cancer barrier: damage threshold and the concept of 'conditional haploinsufficiency'. Cell Cycle 6, 2344-2347.
11. Bartkova, J., Horejsi, Z., Koed, K., Kramer, A., Tort, F., Zieger, K., et al. (2005). DNA damage response as a candidate anti-cancer barrier in early human tumorigenesis. Nature 434, 864-870.
12. Bartkova, J., Rezaei, N., Liontos, M., Karakaidos, P., Kletsas, D., Issaeva, N., et al. (2006). Oncogene-induced senescence is part of the tumorigenesis barrier imposed by DNA damage checkpoints. Nature 444, 633-637.
13. Bashkirov, V. I., Bashkirova, E. V., Haghnazari, E., and Heyer, W. D. (2003). Direct kinase-to-kinase signaling mediated by the FHA phosphoprotein recognition domain of the Dun1 DNA damage checkpoint kinase. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23, 1441-1452.
14. Bazzi, M., Mantiero, D., Trovesi, C., Lucchini, G., and Longhese, M. P. (2010). Dephosphorylation of gamma H2A by Glc7/protein phosphatase 1 promotes recovery from inhibition of DNA replication. Mol. Cell. Biol. 30, 131-145.
15. Bell, S. P., and Dutta, A. (2002). DNA replication in eukaryotic cells. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 71, 333-374.
16. Bentley, N. J., Holtzman, D. A., Flaggs, G., Keegan, K. S., Demaggio, A., Ford, J. C., et al. (1996). The Schizosaccharomyces pombe rad3 checkpoint gene. EMBO J. 15, 6641-6651.
17. Berens, T. J., and Toczyski, D. P. (2012). Colocalization of Mec1 and Mrc1 is sufficient for Rad53 phosphorylation in vivo. Mol. Biol. Cell 23, 1058-1067.
18. Bermejo, R., Capra, T., Gonzalez-Huici, V., Fachinetti, D., Cocito, A., Natoli, G., et al. (2009). Genome-organizing factors Top2 and Hmo1 prevent chromosome fragility at sites of S phase transcription. Cell 138, 870-884.
19. Bermejo, R., Capra, T., Jossen, R., Colosio, A., Frattini, C., Carotenuto, W., et al. (2011). The replication checkpoint protects fork stability by releasing transcribed genes from nuclear pores. Cell 146, 233-246.
20. Bermejo, R., Doksani, Y., Capra, T., Katou, Y. M., Tanaka, H., Shirahige, K., et al. (2007). Top1 and Top2-mediated topological transitions at replication forks ensure fork progression and stability and prevent DNA damage checkpoint activation. Genes Dev. 21, 1921-1936.
21. Bermejo, R., Kumar, A., and Foiani, M. (2012a). Preserving the genome by regulating chromatin association with the nuclear envelope. Trends Cell Biol. 22, 465-473.
22. Bermejo, R., Lai, M. S., and Foiani, M. (2012b). Preventing replication stress to maintain genome stability: resolving conflicts between replication and transcription. Mol. Cell 45, 710-718.
23. Bester, A. C., Roniger, M., Oren, Y. S., Im, M. M., Sarni, D., Chaoat, M., et al. (2011). Nucleotide deficiency promotes genomic instability in early stages of cancer development. Cell 145, 435-446.
24. Boddy, M. N., and Russell, P. (2001). DNA replication checkpoint. Curr. Biol. 11,R953-R956.
25. Branzei, D., and Foiani, M. (2009). The checkpoint response to replication stress. DNA Repair (Amst.) 8, 1038-1046.
26. Branzei, D., and Foiani, M. (2010). Maintaining genome stability at the replication fork. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11,208-219.
27. Byun, T. S., Pacek, M., Yee, M. C., Walter, J. C., and Cimprich, K. A. (2005). Functional uncoupling of MCM helicase and DNA polymerase activities activates the ATR-dependent checkpoint. Genes Dev. 19,1040-1052.
28. Carter, C. D., Kitchen, L. E., Au, W. C., Babic, C. M., and Basrai, M. A. (2005). Loss of SOD1 and LYS7 sensitizes Saccharomyces cerevisiae to hydroxyurea and DNA damage agents and downregulates MEC1 pathway effectors. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 10273-10285.
29. Cha, R. S., and Kleckner, N. (2002). ATR homolog Mec1 promotes fork progression, thus averting breaks in replication slow zones. Science 297, 602-606.
30. Chabes, A., Domkin, V., and Thelander, L. (1999). Yeast Sml1, a protein inhibitor of ribonucleotide reductase. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 36679-36683.
31. Chabes, A., Georgieva, B., Domkin, V., Zhao, X., Rothstein, R., and Thelander, L. (2003). Survival of DNA damage in yeast directly depends on increased dNTP levels allowed by relaxed feedback inhibition of ribonucleotide reductase. Cell 112, 391-401.
32. Chen, S. H., Albuquerque, C. P., Liang, J., Suhandynata, R. T., and Zhou, H. (2010). A proteome-wide analysis of kinase-substrate network in the DNA damage response. J. Biol. Chem. 285,12803-12812.
33. Chen, S. H., and Zhou, H. (2009). Reconstitution of Rad53 activation by Mec1 through adaptor protein Mrc1. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 18593-18604.
34. Ciccia, A., and Elledge, S. J. (2010). The DNA damage response: making it safe to play with knives. Mol. Cell 40, 179-204.
35. Clemenson, C., and Marsolier-Kergoat, M. C. (2009). DNA damage checkpoint inactivation: adaptation and recovery. DNA Repair (Amst.) 8, 1101-1109.
36. Cobb, J. A., Bjergbaek, L., Shimada, K., Frei, C., and Gasser, S. M. (2003). DNA polymerase stabilization at stalled replication forks requires Mec1 and the RecQ helicase Sgs1. EMBO J.22,4325-4336.
37. Cobb, J. A., Schleker, T., Rojas, V., Bjergbaek, L., Tercero, J. A., and Gasser, S. M. (2005). Replisome instability, fork collapse, and gross chromosomal rearrangements arise synergistically from Mec1 kinase and RecQ helicase mutations. Genes Dev. 19, 3055-3069.
38. Cotta-Ramusino, C., Fachinetti, D., Lucca, C., Doksani, Y., Lopes, M., Sogo, J., et al. (2005). Exo1 processes stalled replication forks and counteracts fork reversal in checkpoint-defective cells. Mol. Cell 17, 153-159.
39. de Bruin, R. A., Kalashnikova, T. I., Aslanian, A., Wohlschlegel, J., Chahwan, C., Yates, J. R. 3rd., et al. (2008). DNA replication checkpoint promotes G1-S transcription by inactivating the MBF repressor Nrm1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105,11230-11235.
40. de Bruin, R. A., Kalashnikova, T. I., Chahwan, C., McDonald, W. H., Wohlschlegel, J., Yates, J. 3rd., et al. (2006). Constraining G1-specific transcription to late G1 phase: the MBF-associated corepressor Nrm1 acts via negative feedback. Mol. Cell 23, 483-496.
41. De Piccoli, G., Katou, Y., Itoh, T., Nakato, R., Shirahige, K., and Labib, K. (2012). Replisome stability at defective DNA replication forks is independent of S phase checkpoint kinases. Mol. Cell 45, 696-704.
42. Desany, B. A., Alcasabas, A. A., Bachant, J. B., and Elledge, S. J. (1998). Recovery from DNA replicational stress is the essential function of the S-phase checkpoint pathway. Genes Dev. 12, 2956-2970.
43. Deshpande, A. M., and Newlon, C. S. (1996). DNA replication fork pause sites dependent on transcription. Science 272, 1030-1033.
44. Di Micco, R., Fumagalli, M., Cicalese, A., Piccinin, S., Gasparini, P., Luise, C., et al. (2006). Oncogene-induced senescence is a DNA damage response triggered by DNA hyper-replication. Nature 444, 638-642.
45. Dion, V., Kalck, V., Horigome, C., Towbin, B. D., and Gasser, S. M. (2012). Increased mobility of double-strand breaks requires Mec1, Rad9 and the homologous recombination machinery. Nat. Cell Biol. 14, 502-509.
46. Doksani, Y., Bermejo, R., Fiorani, S., Haber, J. E., and Foiani, M. (2009). Replicon dynamics, dormant origin firing, and terminal fork integrity after double-strand break formation. Cell 137, 247-258.
47. Domkin, V., Thelander, L., and Chabes, A. (2002). Yeast DNA damage-inducible Rnr3 has a very low catalytic activity strongly stimulated after the formation of a cross-talking Rnr1/Rnr3 complex. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 18574-18578.
48. Enoch, T., Carr, A. M., and Nurse, P. (1992). Fission yeast genes involved in coupling mitosis to completion of DNA replication. Genes Dev. 6, 2035-2046.
49. Enoch, T., and Nurse, P. (1990). Mutation of fission yeast cell cycle control genes abolishes dependence of mitosis on DNA replication. Cell 60, 665-673.
50. Enserink, J. M., Smolka, M. B., Zhou, H., and Kolodner, R. D. (2006). Checkpoint proteins control morphogenetic events during DNA replication stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol. 175,729-741.
51. Feng, W., Collingwood, D., Boeck, M. E., Fox, L. A., Alvino, G. M., Fangman, W. L., et al. (2006). Genomic mapping of single-stranded DNA in hydroxyurea-challenged yeasts identifies origins of replication. Nat. Cell Biol. 8, 148-155.
52. Feng, W., Di Rienzi, S. C., Raghuraman, M. K., and Brewer, B. J. (2011). Replication stress-induced chromosome breakage is correlated with replication fork progression and is preceded by single-stranded DNA formation. G3 (Bethesda) 1, 327-335.
53. Gambus, A., Jones, R. C., Sanchez-Diaz, A., Kanemaki, M., Van Deursen, F., Edmondson, R. D., et al. (2006). GINS maintains association of Cdc45 with MCM in replisome progression complexes at eukaryotic DNA replication forks. Nat. Cell Biol. 8,358-366.
54. Ghavidel, A., Kislinger, T., Pogoutse, O., Sopko, R., Jurisica, I., and Emili, A. (2007). Impaired tRNA nuclear export links DNA damage and cell-cycle checkpoint. Cell 131, 915-926.
55. Gomez-Gonzalez, B., Garcia-Rubio, M., Bermejo, R., Gaillard, H., Shirahige, K., Marin, A., et al. (2011). Genome-wide function of THO/TREX in active genes prevents R-loop-dependent replication obstacles. EMBO J. 30, 3106-3119.
56. Gorgoulis, V. G., Vassiliou, L. V., Karakaidos, P., Zacharatos, P., Kotsinas, A., Liloglou, T., et al. (2005). Activation of the DNA damage checkpoint and genomic instability in human precancerous lesions. Nature 434, 907-913.
57. Greenwell, P. W., Kronmal, S. L., Porter, S. E., Gassenhuber, J., Obermaier, B., and Petes, T. D. (1995). TEL1, a gene involved in controlling telom-ere length in S. cerevisiae, is homologous to the human ataxia telang-iectasia gene. Cell 82, 823-829.
58. Guillemain, G., Ma, E., Mauger, S., Miron, S., Thai, R., Guerois, R., et al. (2007). Mechanisms of checkpoint kinase Rad53 inactivation after a double-strand break in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell Biol. 27, 3378-3389.
59. Halazonetis, T. D., Gorgoulis, V. G., and Bartek, J. (2008). An oncogene-induced DNA damage model for cancer development. Science 319, 1352-1355.
60. Heideker, J., Lis, E. T., and Romesberg, F. E. (2007). Phosphatases, DNA damage checkpoints and checkpoint deactivation. Cell Cycle 6, 3058-3064.
61. Huang, M., Zhou, Z., and Elledge, S. J. (1998). The DNA replication and damage checkpoint pathways induce transcription by inhibition of the Crt1 repressor. Cell 94, 595-605.
62. Iftode, C., Daniely, Y., and Borowiec, J. A. (1999). Replication protein A (RPA): the eukaryotic SSB. Crit Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 34, 141-180.
63. Jackson, S. P., and Bartek, J. (2009). The DNA-damage response in human biology and disease. Nature 461, 1071-1078.
64. Johnson, A., and O'Donnell, M. (2005). Cellular DNA replicases: components and dynamics at the replication fork. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 74, 283-315.
65. Kaochar, S., Shanks, L., and Weinert, T. (2010). Checkpoint genes and Exo1 regulate nearby inverted repeat fusions that form di centric chromosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 21605-21610.
66. Kastan, M. B., and Bartek, J. (2004). Cell-cycle checkpoints and cancer. Nature 432, 316-323.
67. Katou, Y., Kanoh, Y., Bando, M., Noguchi, H., Tanaka, H., Ashikari, T., et al. (2003). S-phase checkpoint proteins Tof1 and Mrc1 form a stable replication-pausing complex. Nature 424, 1078-1083.
68. Kawabata, T., Luebben, S. W., Yamaguchi, S., Ilves, I., Matise, I., Buske, T., et al. (2011). Stalled fork rescue via dormant replication origins in unchallenged S phase promotes proper chromosome segregation and tumor suppression. Mol. Cell 41, 543-553.
69. Keogh, M. C., Kim, J. A., Downey, M., Fillingham, J., Chowdhury, D., Harrison, J. C., et al. (2006). A phosphatase complex that dephosphorylates gammaH2AX regulates DNA damage checkpoint recovery. Nature 439,497-501.
70. Koch, C., Moll, T., Neuberg, M., Ahorn, H., and Nasmyth, K. (1993). A role for the transcription factors Mbp1 and Swi4 in progression from G1 to S phase. Science 261, 1551-1557.
71. Kohler, A., and Hurt, E. (2007). Exporting RNA from the nucleus to the cytoplasm. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8, 761-773.
72. Koster, D. A., Crut, A., Shuman, S., Bjornsti, M. A., and Dekker, N. H. (2010). Cellular strategies for regulating DNA supercoiling: a single-molecule perspective. Cell 142,519-530.
73. Krishnan, V., Nirantar, S., Crasta, K., Cheng, A. Y., and Surana, U. (2004). DNA replication checkpoint prevents precocious chromosome segregation by regulating spindle behavior. Mol. Cell 16, 687-700.
74. Labib, K., and De Piccoli, G. (2011). Surviving chromosome replication: the many roles of the S-phase checkpoint pathway. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 366, 3554-3561.
75. Labib, K., and Hodgson, B. (2007). Replication fork barriers: pausing for a break or stalling for time? EMBO Rep. 8, 346-353.
76. Labib, K., Tercero, J. A., and Diffley, J. F. (2000). Uninterrupted MCM2-7 function required for DNA replication fork progression. Science 288, 1643-1647.
77. Lee, Y D., and Elledge, S. J. (2006). Control of ribonucleotide reductase localization through an anchoring mechanism involving Wtm1. Genes Dev. 20, 334-344.
78. Lee, Y D., Wang, J., Stubbe, J., and Elledge, S. J. (2008). Dif1 is a DNA-damage-regulated facilitator of nuclear import for ribonucleotide reductase. Mol. Cell 32, 70-80.
79. Lengronne, A., McIntyre, J., Katou, Y., Kanoh, Y., Hopfner, K. P., Shirahige, K., et al. (2006). Establishment of sister chromatid cohesion at the S. cerevisiae replication fork. Mol. Cell 23, 787-799.
80. Leroy, C., Lee, S. E., Vaze, M. B., Ochsenbein, F., Guerois, R., Haber, J. E., et al. (2003). PP2C phosphatases Ptc2 and Ptc3 are required for DNA checkpoint inactivation after a double-strand break. Mol. Cell 11, 827-835.
81. Li, B., and Reese, J. C. (2001). Ssn6-Tup1 regulates RNR3 by positioning nucleosomes and affecting the chromatin structure at the upstream repression sequence. J. Biol. Chem. 276,33788-33797.
82. Longhese, M. P., Clerici, M., and Lucchini, G. (2003). The S-phase checkpoint and its regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutat. Res. 532, 41-58.
83. Longhese, M. P., Mantiero, D., and Clerici, M. (2006). The cellular response to chromosome breakage. Mol. Microbiol. 60, 1099-1108.
84. Lopes, M., Cotta-Ramusino, C., Pellicioli, A., Liberi, G., Plevani, P., Muzi-Falconi, M., et al. (2001). The DNA replication checkpoint response stabilizes stalled replication forks. Nature 412, 557-561.
85. Lopez-Mosqueda, J., Maas, N. L., Jonsson, Z. O., Defazio-Eli, L. G., Wohlschlegel, J., and Toczyski, D. P. (2010). Damage-induced phos-phorylation of Sld3 is important to block late origin firing. Nature 467, 479-483.
86. Lou, H., Komata, M., Katou, Y., Guan, Z., Reis, C. C., Budd, M., et al. (2008). Mrc1 and DNA polymerase epsilon function together in linking DNA replication and the S phase checkpoint. Mol. Cell 32, 106-117.
87. Lovejoy, C. A., and Cortez, D. (2009). Common mechanisms of PIKK regulation. DNA Repair (Amst.) 8, 1004-1008.
88. Lucca, C., Vanoli, F., Cotta-Ramusino, C., Pellicioli, A., Liberi, G., Haber, J., et al. (2004). Checkpoint-mediated control of replisome-fork association and signalling in response to replication pausing. Oncogene 23, 1206-1213.
89. Lupardus, P. J., Byun, T., Yee, M. C., Hekmat-Nejad, M., and Cimprich, K. A. (2002). A requirement for replication in activation of the ATR-dependent DNA damage checkpoint. GenesDev. 16,2327-2332.
90. Mailand, N., Bekker-Jensen, S., Bartek, J., and Lukas, J. (2006). Destruction of Claspin by SCFbetaTrCP restrains Chk1 activation and facilitates recovery from genotoxic stress. Mol. Cell 23, 307-318.
91. Mallory, J. C., and Petes, T. D. (2000). Protein kinase activity of Tel1p and Mec1p, two Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteins related to the human ATM protein kinase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97, 13749-13754.
92. Mamely, I., Van Vugt, M. A., Smits, V. A., Semple, J. I., Lemmens, B., Perrakis, A., et al. (2006). Polo-like kinase-1 controls proteasome-dependent degradation of Claspin during checkpoint recovery. Curr. Biol. 16, 1950-1955.
93. Mine-Hattab, J., and Rothstein, R. (2012). Increased chromosome mobility facilitates homology search during recombination. Nat. Cell Biol. 14,510-517.
94. Moldovan, G. L., Pfander, B., and Jentsch, S. (2007). PCNA, the maestro of the replication fork. Cell 129, 665-679.
95. Morin, I., Ngo, H. P., Greenall, A., Zubko, M. K., Morrice, N., and Lydall, D. (2008). Checkpoint-dependent phosphorylation of Exo1 modulates the DNA damage response. EMBO J. 27, 2400-2410.
96. Morrow, D. M., Tagle, D. A., Shiloh, Y., Collins, E S., and Hieter, P. (1995). TEL1, an S. cerevisiae homolog of the human gene mutated in ataxia telangiectasia, is functionally related to the yeast checkpoint gene MEC1. Cell 82, 831-840.
97. Myung, K., Datta, A., and Kolodner, R. D. (2001). Suppression of spontaneous chromosomal rearrangements by S phase checkpoint functions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell 104, 397-408.
98. Myung, K., and Kolodner, R. D. (2002). Suppression of genome instability by redundant S-phase checkpoint pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 4500-4507.
99. Nedelcheva-Veleva, M. N., Krastev, D. B., and Stoynov, S. S. (2006). Coordination of DNA synthesis and replicative unwinding by the S-phase checkpoint pathways. Nucleic Acids Res. 34,4138-4146.
100. Nguyen, V. C., Clelland, B. W., Hockman, D. J., Kujat-Choy, S. L., Mewhort, H. E., and Schultz, M. C. (2010). Replication stress checkpoint signaling controls tRNA gene transcription. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17,976-981.
101. Nyberg, K. A., Michelson, R. J., Putnam, C. W., and Weinert, T. A. (2002). Toward maintaining the genome: DNA damage and replication checkpoints. Annu. Rev. Genet. 36, 617-656.
102. O'Neill, B. M., Szyjka, S. J., Lis, E. T., Bailey, A. O., Yates, J. R. 3rd., Aparicio, O. M., et al. (2007). Pph3-Psy2 is a phosphatase complex required for Rad53 dephospho-rylation and replication fork restart during recovery from DNA damage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 9290-9295.
103. Osborn, A. J., and Elledge, S. J. (2003). Mrc1 is a replication fork component whose phosphorylation in response to DNA replication stress activates Rad53. Genes Dev. 17, 1755-1767.
104. Osborn, A. J., Elledge, S. J., and Zou, L. (2002). Checking on the fork: the DNA-replication stress-response pathway. Trends Cell Biol. 12, 509-516.
105. Paciotti, V., Clerici, M., Scotti, M., Lucchini, G., and Longhese, M. P. (2001). Characterization of mec1 kinase-deficient mutants and of new hypomorphic mec1 alleles impairing subsets of the DNA damage response pathway. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21, 3913-3925.
106. Palou, G., Palou, R., Guerra-Moreno, A., Duch, A., Travesa, A., and Quintana, D. G. (2010). Cyclin regulation by the s phase checkpoint. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 26431-26440.
107. Paulovich, A. G., and Hartwell, L. H. (1995). A checkpoint regulates the rate of progression through S phase in S. cerevisiae in response to DNA damage. Cell 82, 841-847.
108. Pellicioli, A., and Foiani, M. (2005). Signal transduction: how rad53 kinase is activated. Curr. Biol. 15, R769-R771.
109. Pellicioli, A., Lucca, C., Liberi, G., Marini, F., Lopes, M., Plevani, P., et al. (1999). Activation of Rad53 kinase in response to DNA damage and its effect in modulating phosphorylation of the lagging strand DNA polymerase. EMBO J. 18, 6561-6572.
110. Peschiaroli, A., Dorrello, N. V., Guardavaccaro, D., Venere, M., Halazonetis, T., Sherman, N. E., et al. (2006). SCFbetaTrCP-mediated degradation of Claspin regulates recovery from the DNA replication checkpoint response. Mol. Cell 23, 319-329.
111. Postow, L., Crisona, N. J., Peter, B. J., Hardy, C. D., and Cozzarelli, N. R. (2001a). Topological challenges to DNA replication: conformations at the fork. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98,8219-8226.
112. Postow, L., Ullsperger, C., Keller, R. W., Bustamante, C., Vologodskii, A. V., and Cozzarelli, N. R. (2001b). Positive torsional strain causes the formation of a four-way junction at replication forks. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 2790-2796.
113. Pursell, Z. F., Isoz, I., Lundstrom, E. B., Johansson, E., and Kunkel, T. A. (2007). Yeast DNA polymerase epsilon participates in leading-strand DNA replication. Science 317, 127-130.
114. Putnam, C. D., Jaehnig, E. J., and Kolodner, R. D. (2009). Perspectives on the DNA damage and replication checkpoint responses in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. DNA Repair (Amst.) 8, 974-982.
115. Raghuraman, M. K., Winzeler, E. A., Collingwood, D., Hunt, S., Wodicka, L., Conway, A., et al. (2001). Replication dynamics of the yeast genome. Science 294, 115-121.
116. Randell, J. C., Fan, A., Chan, C., Francis, L. I., Heller, R. C., Galani, K., et al. (2010). Mec1 is one of multiple kinases that prime the Mcm2-7 helicase for phosphorylation by Cdc7. Mol. Cell 40, 353-363.
117. Raveendranathan, M., Chattopadhyay, S., Bolon, Y. T., Haworth, J., Clarke, D. J., and Bielinsky, A. K. (2006). Genome-wide replication profiles of S-phase checkpoint mutants reveal fragile sites in yeast. EMBO J. 25, 3627-3639.
118. Ray Chaudhuri, A., Hashimoto, Y., Herrador, R., Neelsen, K. J., Fachinetti, D., Bermejo, R., et al. (2012). Topoisomerase I poisoning results in PARP-mediated replication fork reversal. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 19, 417-423.
119. Rhind, N., and Russell, P. (1998). Mitotic DNA damage and replication checkpoints in yeast. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 10,749-758.
120. Rodriguez, J., and Tsukiyama, T. (2013). ATR-like kinase Mec1 facilitates both chromatin accessibility at DNA replication forks and replication fork progression during replication stress. Genes Dev. 27, 74-86.
121. Rowley, R., Subramani, S., and Young, P. G. (1992). Checkpoint controls in Schizosaccharomycespombe: rad1. EMBOJ. 11, 1335-1342.
122. Santocanale, C., and Diffley, J. F. (1998). A Mec1 and Rad53-dependent checkpoint controls late-firing origins of DNA replication. Nature 395, 615-618.
123. Savitsky, K., Bar-Shira, A., Gilad, S., Rotman, G., Ziv, Y., Vanagaite, L., et al. (1995). A single ataxia telangiectasia gene with a product similar to PI-3 kinase. Science 268, 1749-1753.
124. Segurado, M., and Diffley, J. F. (2008). Separate roles for the DNA damage checkpoint protein kinases in stabilizing DNA replication forks. Genes Dev. 22, 1816-1827.
125. Segurado, M., and Tercero, J. A. (2009). The S-phase checkpoint: targeting the replication fork. Biol. Cell 101, 617-627.
126. Shen, C., Lancaster, C. S., Shi, B., Guo, H., Thimmaiah, P., and Bjornsti, M. A. (2007). TOR signaling is a determinant of cell survival in response to DNA damage. Mol. Cell Biol. 27, 7007-7017.
127. Shirahige, K., Hori, Y., Shiraishi, K., Yamashita, M., Takahashi, K., Obuse, C., et al. (1998). Regulation of DNA-replication origins during cell-cycle progression. Nature 395, 618-621.
128. Smolka, M. B., Albuquerque, C. P., Chen, S. H., and Zhou, H. (2007). Proteome-wide identification of in vivo targets of DNA damage checkpoint kinases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 10364-10369.
129. Smolka, M. B., Bastos De Oliveira, E M., Harris, M. R., and De Bruin, R. A. (2012). The checkpoint tran-scriptional response: make sure to turn it off once you are satisfied. Cell Cycle 11,3166-3174.
130. Sogo, J. M., Lopes, M., and Foiani, M. (2002). Fork reversal and ssDNA accumulation at stalled replication forks owing to checkpoint defects. Science 297, 599-602.
131. Stokes, M. P., Van Hatten, R., Lindsay, H. D., and Michael, W. M. (2002). DNA replication is required for the checkpoint response to damaged DNA in Xenopus egg extracts. J. Cell Biol. 158, 863-872.
132. Szyjka, S. J., Aparicio, J. G., Viggiani, C. J., Knott, S., Xu, W., Tavare, S., et al. (2008). Rad53 regulates replication fork restart after DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 22, 1906-1920.
133. Szyjka, S. J., Viggiani, C. J., and Aparicio, O. M. (2005). Mrc1 is required for normal progression of replication forks throughout chro-matin in S. cerevisiae. Mol. Cell 19, 691-697.
134. Tanaka, K., and Russell, P. (2001). Mrc1 channels the DNA replication arrest signal to checkpoint kinase Cds1. Nat. Cell Biol. 3,966-972.
135. Tercero, J. A., and Diffley, J. F. (2001). Regulation of DNA replication fork progression through damaged DNA by the Mec1/Rad53 checkpoint. Nature 412, 553-557.
136. Tercero, J. A., Longhese, M. P., and Diffley, J. F. (2003). A central role for DNA replication forks in checkpoint activation and response. Mol. Cell 11, 1323-1336.
137. Tourriere, H., Versini, G., Cordon-Preciado, V., Alabert, C., and Pasero, P. (2005). Mrc1 and Tof1 promote replication fork progression and recovery independently of Rad53. Mol. Cell 19, 699-706.
138. Travesa, A., Duch, A., and Quintana, D. G. (2008). Distinct phos-phatases mediate the deactivation of the DNA damage checkpoint kinase Rad53. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 17123-17130.
139. Travesa, A., Kuo, D., De Bruin, R. A., Kalashnikova, T. I., Guaderrama, M., Thai, K., et al. (2012). DNA replication stress differentially regulates G1/S genes via Rad53-dependent inactivation of Nrm1. EMBOJ. 31, 1811-1822.
140. Waga, S., and Stillman, B. (1998). The DNA replication fork in eukary-otic cells. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 67, 721-751.
141. Wang, J. C. (2002). Cellular roles of DNA topoisomerases: a molecular perspective. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 3, 430-440.
142. Weinert, T. A. (1992). Dual cell cycle checkpoints sensitive to chromosome replication and DNA damage in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Radiat. Res. 132,141-143.
143. Weinert, T. A., Kiser, G. L., and Hartwell, L. H. (1994). Mitotic checkpoint genes in budding yeast and the dependence of mitosis on DNA replication and repair. Genes Dev. 8, 652-665.
144. Yao, R., Zhang, Z., An, X., Bucci, B., Perlstein, D. L., Stubbe, J., et al. (2003). Subcellular localization of yeast ribonucleotide reductase regulated by the DNA replication and damage checkpoint pathways. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 6628-6633.
145. You, Z., Kong, L., and Newport, J. (2002). The role of single-stranded DNA and polymerase alpha in establishing the ATR, Hus1 DNA replication checkpoint. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 27088-27093.
146. Zaim, J., Speina, E., and Kierzek, A. M. (2005). Identification of new genes regulated by the Crt1 transcription factor, an effector of the DNA damage checkpoint pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 28-37.
147. Zegerman, P., and Diffley, J. E (2009). DNA replication as a target of the DNA damage checkpoint. DNA Repair (Amst.) 8, 1077-1088.
148. Zegerman, P., and Diffley, J. E (2010). Checkpoint-dependent inhibition of DNA replication initiation by Sld3 and Dbf4 phosphorylation. Nature 467, 474-478.
149. Zhang, Y. W., Otterness, D. M., Chiang, G. G., Xie, W., Liu, Y. C., Mercurio, E, et al. (2005). Genotoxic stress targets human Chk1 for degradation by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Mol. Cell 19, 607-618.
150. Zhao, X., Chabes, A., Domkin, V., Thelander, L., and Rothstein, R. (2001). The ribonucleotide reductase inhibitor Sml1 is a new target of the Mec1/Rad53 kinase cascade during growth and in response to DNA damage. EMBO J. 20, 3544-3553.
151. Zhao, X., Muller, E. G., and Rothstein, R. (1998). A suppressor of two essential checkpoint genes identifies a novel protein that negatively affects dNTP pools. Mol. Cell 2, 329-340.
152. Zhao, X., and Rothstein, R. (2002). The Dun1 checkpoint kinase phos-phorylates and regulates the ribonucleotide reductase inhibitor Sml1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 3746-3751.
153. Zhou, Z., and Elledge, S. J. (1993). DUN1 encodes a protein kinase that controls the DNA damage response in yeast. Cell 75, 1119-1127.
154. Zou, L., and Elledge, S. J. (2003). Sensing DNA damage through ATRIP recognition of RPA-ssDNA complexes. Science 300, 1542-1548.