Checking on the fork: The DNA-replication stress-response pathway

Trends in Cell Biology

Volumn 12, Issue 11, 2002, Pages 509-516

  Osborn, Alexander J ^a   Elledge, Stephen J ^a   Zou, Lee ^a  

^a BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA; PHOSPHOTRANSFERASE;

APOPTOSIS; CELL CYCLE; DNA MODIFICATION; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; GENOME; HUMAN; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGULATORY MECHANISM; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; STRESS;

ANIMALS; DNA REPLICATION; GENES, CDC; S PHASE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; YEASTS;

EID: 0036849432     PISSN: 09628924     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0962-8924(02)02380-2     Document Type: Review

References (63)

1. Myung K., et al. Suppression of spontaneous chromosomal rearrangements by S phase checkpoint functions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell. 104:2001;397-408.
2. Zhou B.B., Elledge S.J. The DNA damage response: putting checkpoints in perspective. Nature. 408:2000;433-439.
3. Longhese M.P., et al. The novel DNA damage checkpoint protein Ddc1p is phosphorylated periodically during the cell cycle and in response to DNA damage in budding yeast. EMBO J. 16:1997;5216-5226.
4. Bhaumik D., Wang T.S. Mutational effect of fission yeast Polα on cell cycle events. Mol. Biol. Cell. 9:1998;2107-2123.
5. Tercero J.A., Diffley J.F. Regulation of DNA replication fork progression through damaged DNA by the Mec1/Rad53 checkpoint. Nature. 412:2001;553-557.
6. Neecke H., et al. Cell cycle progression in the presence of irreparable DNA damage is controlled by a Mec1- and Rad53-dependent checkpoint in budding yeast. Embo J. 18:1999;4485-4497.
7. Kumagai A., et al. The Xenopus Chk1 protein kinase mediates a caffeine-sensitive pathway of checkpoint control in cell-free extracts. J. Cell Biol. 142:1998;1559-1569.
8. Cliby W.A., et al. S phase and G2 arrests induced by topoisomerase I poisons are dependent on ATR kinase function. J. Biol. Chem. 277:2002;1599-1606.
9. Paciotti V., et al. The checkpoint protein Ddc2, functionally related to S. pombe Rad26, interacts with Mec1 and is regulated by Mec1-dependent phosphorylation in budding yeast. Genes Dev. 14:2000;2046-2059.
10. Brush G.S., et al. The ATM homologue MEC1 is required for phosphorylation of replication protein A in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93:1996;15075-15080.
11. Zhao X., Rothstein R. The Dun1 checkpoint kinase phosphorylates and regulates the ribonucleotide reductase inhibitor Sml1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99:2002;3746-3751.
12. Cha R.S., Kleckner N. ATR homolog Mec1 promotes fork progression, thus averting breaks in replication slow zones. Science. 297:2002;602-606.
13. Liu Q., et al. Chk1 is an essential kinase that is regulated by Atr and required for the G(2)/M DNA damage checkpoint. Genes Dev. 14:2000;1448-1459.
14. Guo Z., et al. Requirement for Atr in phosphorylation of Chk1 and cell cycle regulation in response to DNA replication blocks and UV-damaged DNA in Xenopus egg extracts. Genes Dev. 14:2000;2745-2756.
15. Cortez D., et al. ATR and ATRIP: partners in checkpoint signaling. Science. 294:2001;1713-1716.
16. Edwards R.J., et al. A Rad3-Rad26 complex responds to DNA damage independently of other checkpoint proteins. Nat. Cell Biol. 1:1999;393-398.
17. Wakayama T., et al. Pie1, a protein interacting with Mec1, controls cell growth and checkpoint responses in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21:2001;755-764.
18. Rouse J., Jackson S.P. LCD1: an essential gene involved in checkpoint control and regulation of the MEC1 signalling pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Embo J. 19:2000;5801-5812.
19. Kondo T., et al. Recruitment of Mec1 and Ddc1 checkpoint proteins to double-strand breaks through distinct mechanisms. Science. 294:2001;867-870.
20. Melo J.A., et al. Two checkpoint complexes are independently recruited to sites of DNA damage in vivo. Genes Dev. 15:2001;2809-2821.
21. Rouse J., Jackson S.P. Lcd1p recruits Mec1p to DNA lesions in vitro and in vivo. Mol. Cell. 9:2002;857-869.
22. Unsal-Kacmaz K., et al. Preferential binding of ATR protein to UV-damaged DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99:2002;6673-6678.
23. Hekmat-Nejad M., et al. Xenopus ATR is a replication-dependent chromatin-binding protein required for the DNA replication checkpoint. Curr. Biol. 10:2000;1565-1573.
24. You Z., et al. The role of single-stranded DNA and Pol α in establishing the ATR, Hus1 DNA replication checkpoint. J Biol Chem. 277:2002;27088-27093.
25. O'Connell M.J., et al. The G2-phase DNA-damage checkpoint. Trends Cell Biol. 10:2000;296-303.
26. Lindsey-Boltz L.A., et al. Purification and characterization of human DNA damage checkpoint Rad complexes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98:2001;11236-11241.
27. Griffith J.D., et al. Structures of the human Rad17-replication factor C and checkpoint Rad 9-1-1 complexes visualized by glycerol spray/low voltage microscopy. J. Biol. Chem. 277:2002;15233-15236.
28. Shiomi Y., et al. Clamp and clamp loader structures of the human checkpoint protein complexes, Rad9-1-1 and Rad17-RFC. Genes Cells. 7:2002;861-868.
29. Zou L., et al. Regulation of ATR substrate selection by Rad17-dependent loading of Rad9 complexes onto chromatin. Genes Dev. 16:2002;198-208.
30. Michael W.M., et al. Activation of the DNA replication checkpoint through RNA synthesis by primase. Science. 289:2000;2133-2137.
31. Weiss R.S., et al. Hus1 acts upstream of chk1 in a mammalian DNA damage response pathway. Curr. Biol. 12:2002;73-77.
32. Bao S., et al. ATR/ATM-mediated phosphorylation of human Rad17 is required for genotoxic stress responses. Nature. 411:2001;969-974.
33. Post S., et al. Phosphorylation of serines 635 and 645 of human Rad17 is cell cycle regulated and is required for G(1)/S checkpoint activation in response to DNA damage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98:2001;13102-13107.
34. Chen M.J., et al. ATM-dependent phosphorylation of human Rad9 is required for ionizing radiation-induced checkpoint activation. J. Biol. Chem. 276:2001;16580-16586.
35. Navas T.A., et al. DNA polymerase epsilon links the DNA replication machinery to the S phase checkpoint. Cell. 80:1995;29-39.
36. Araki H., et al. Dpb11, which interacts with DNA polymerase II(epsilon) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, has a dual role in S-phase progression and at a cell cycle checkpoint. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92:1995;11791-11795.
37. Wang H., Elledge S.J. DRC1, DNA replication and checkpoint protein 1, functions with DPB11 to control DNA replication and the S-phase checkpoint in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96:1999;3824-3829.
38. Wang H., Elledge S.J. Genetic and physical interactions between DPB11 and DDC1 in the yeast DNA damage response pathway. Genetics. 160:2002;1295-1304.
39. Makiniemi M., et al. BRCT domain-containing protein TopBP1 functions in DNA replication and damage response. J. Biol. Chem. 276:2001;30399-30406.
40. Longhese M.P., et al. The 70 kDa subunit of replication protein A is required for the G1/S and intra-S DNA damage checkpoints in budding yeast. Nucleic Acids Res. 24:1996;3533-3537.
41. Marini F., et al. A role for DNA primase in coupling DNA replication to DNA damage response. Embo J. 16:1997;639-650.
42. Tan S., Wang T.S. Analysis of fission yeast primase defines the checkpoint responses to aberrant S phase initiation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:2000;7853-7866.
43. Kumagai A., Dunphy W.G. Claspin, a novel protein required for the activation of Chk1 during a DNA replication checkpoint response in Xenopus egg extracts. Mol. Cell. 6:2000;839-849.
44. Kim S.T., et al. Substrate specificities and identification of putative substrates of ATM kinase family members. J. Biol. Chem. 274:1999;37538-37543.
45. Gilbert C.S., et al. Budding yeast Rad9 is an ATP-dependent Rad53 activating machine. Mol. Cell. 8:2001;129-136.
46. Sun Z., et al. Rad53 FHA domain associated with phosphorylated Rad9 in the DNA damage checkpoint. Science. 281:1998;272-274.
47. Schwartz M.F., et al. Rad9 phosphorylation sites couple Rad53 to the Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA damage checkpoint. Mol. Cell. 9:2002;1055-1065.
48. Alcasabas A.A., et al. Mrc1 transduces signals of DNA replication stress to activate Rad53. Nat. Cell Biol. 3:2001;958-965.
49. Tanaka K., Russell P. Mrc1 channels the DNA replication arrest signal to checkpoint kinase Cds1. Nat. Cell Biol. 3:2001;966-972.
50. Desany B.A., et al. Recovery from DNA replicational stress is the essential function of the S-phase checkpoint pathway. Genes Dev. 12:1998;2956-2970.
51. Lopes M., et al. The DNA replication checkpoint response stabilizes stalled replication forks. Nature. 412:2001;557-561.
52. Sogo J.M., et al. Fork reversal and ssDNA accumulation at stalled replication forks owing to checkpoint defects. Science. 297:2002;599-602.
53. Singleton M.R., et al. Structural analysis of DNA replication fork reversal by RecG. Cell. 107:2001;79-89.
54. Seigneur M., et al. RuvAB acts at arrested replication forks. Cell. 95:1998;419-430.
55. Michel B., et al. Rescue of arrested replication forks by homologous recombination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98:2001;8181-8188.
56. Karow J.K., et al. The Bloom's syndrome gene product promotes branch migration of Holliday junctions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97:2000;6504-6508.
57. Constantinou A., et al. Branch migration and Holliday junction resolution catalyzed by activities from mammalian cells. Cell. 104:2001;259-268.
58. Boddy M.N., et al. Mus81-Eme1 are essential components of a Holliday junction resolvase. Cell. 107:2001;537-548.
59. Chen X.B., et al. Human Mus81-associated endonuclease cleaves Holliday junctions in vitro. Mol. Cell. 8:2001;1117-1127.
60. Interthal H., Heyer W.D. MUS81 encodes a novel helix-hairpin-helix protein involved in the response to UV- and methylation-induced DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Gen. Genet. 263:2000;812-827.
61. Mullen J.R., et al. Requirement for three novel protein complexes in the absence of the Sgs1 DNA helicase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 157:2001;103-118.
62. Franchitto A., Pichierri P. Bloom's syndrome protein is required for correct relocalization of RAD50/MRE11/NBS1 complex after replication fork arrest. J. Cell Biol. 157:2002;19-30.
63. Boddy M.N., et al. Damage tolerance protein Mus81 associates with the FHA1 domain of checkpoint kinase Cds1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:2000;8758-8766.