The checkpoint transcriptional response: Make sure to turn it off once you are satisfied

Cell Cycle

Volumn 11, Issue 17, 2012, Pages 3166-3174

  Smolka, Marcus B ^a   Bastos De Oliveira, Francisco M ^a   Harris, Michael R ^b   De Bruin, Robertus A M ^b,c  

^a School of Integrative Plant Sciences   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Checkpoint effectors; Dosage sensitive genes; Nrm1; Rad53; Replication checkpoint; Replication stress; SBF and MBF; Switch genes; Yeast

Indexed keywords

DNA DAMAGE; DNA DAMAGE CHECKPOINT; DNA REPLICATION; G1 PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT; GENE SWITCHING; NONHUMAN; REVIEW; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; TRANSCRIPTION INITIATION; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 84866293389     PISSN: 15384101     EISSN: 15514005     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/cc.21197     Document Type: Review

References (69)

1. Segurado M, Tercero JA. The S-phase checkpoint: targeting the replication fork. Biol Cell 2009; 101:617-27; PMID:19686094; http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/ BC20090053.
2. Branzei D, Foiani M. The DNA damage response during DNA replication. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2005; 17:568-75; PMID:16226452; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb. 2005.09.003.
3. Putnam CD, Jaehnig EJ, Kolodner RD. Perspectives on the DNA damage and replication checkpoint responses in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. DNA Repair (Amst) 2009; 8:974-82; PMID:19477695; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2009.04.021.
4. Zegerman P, Diffley JF. DNA replication as a target of the DNA damage checkpoint. DNA Repair (Amst) 2009; 8:1077-88; PMID:19505853; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2009.04.023.
5. Friedel AM, Pike BL, Gasser SM. ATR/Mec1: coordinating fork stability and repair. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2009; 21:237-44; PMID:19230642; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2009.01.017.
6. Branzei D, Foiani M. Maintaining genome stability at the replication fork. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2010; 11:208-19; PMID:20177396; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/nrm2852.
7. Ivessa AS, Lenzmeier BA, Bessler JB, Goudsouzian LK, Schnakenberg SL, Zakian VA. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae helicase Rrm3p facilitates replication past nonhistone protein-DNA complexes. Mol Cell 2003; 12:1525-36; PMID:14690605; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00456-8.
8. Torres JZ, Bessler JB, Zakian VA. Local chromatin structure at the ribosomal DNA causes replication fork pausing and genome instability in the absence of the S. cerevisiae DNA helicase Rrm3p. Genes Dev 2004; 18:498-503; PMID:15037547; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1154704.
9. Lopes M, Cotta-Ramusino C, Pellicioli A, Liberi G, Plevani P, Muzi-Falconi M, et al. The DNA replication checkpoint response stabilizes stalled replication forks. Nature 2001; 412:557-61; PMID:11484058; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35087613.
10. Tercero JA, Diffley JF. Regulation of DNA replication fork progression through damaged DNA by the Mec1/Rad53 checkpoint. Nature 2001; 412:553-7; PMID:11484057; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35087607.
11. Bermejo R, Lai MS, Foiani M. Preventing replication stress to maintain genome stability: resolving conflicts between replication and transcription. Mol Cell 2012; 45:710-8; PMID:22464441; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2012.03. 001.
12. Branzei D, Foiani M. The checkpoint response to replication stress. DNA Repair (Amst) 2009; 8:1038-46; PMID:19482564; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. dnarep.2009.04.014.
13. Bastos de Oliveira FM, Harris MR, Brazauskas P, de Bruin RA, Smolka MB. Linking DNA replication checkpoint to MBF cell-cycle transcription reveals a distinct class of G1/S genes. EMBO J 2012; 31:1798-810; PMID:22333912; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2012.27.
14. Huang M, Zhou Z, Elledge SJ. The DNA replication and damage checkpoint pathways induce transcription by inhibition of the Crt1 repressor. Cell 1998; 94:595-605; PMID:9741624; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81601-3.
15. Wu X, Bayle JH, Olson D, Levine AJ. The p53-mdm-2 autoregulatory feedback loop. Genes Dev 1993; 7(7A):1126-32; PMID:8319905; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/ gad.7.7a.1126.
16. Butala M, Zgur-Bertok D, Busby SJ. The bacterial LexA transcriptional repressor. Cell Mol Life Sci 2009; 66:82-93; PMID:18726173; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/s00018-008-8378-6.
17. Rouse J, Jackson SP. Interfaces between the detection, signaling, and repair of DNA damage. Science 2002; 297:547-51; PMID:12142523; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1074740.
18. Kolodner RD, Putnam CD, Myung K. Maintenance of genome stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 2002; 297:552-7; PMID:12142524; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1075277.
19. Paulsen RD, Cimprich KA. The ATR pathway: finetuning the fork. DNA Repair (Amst) 2007; 6:953-66; PMID:17531546; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2007. 02.015.
20. López-Contreras AJ, Fernandez-Capetillo O. The ATR barrier to replication-born DNA damage. DNA Repair (Amst) 2010; 9:1249-55; PMID:21036674; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2010.09.012.
21. Bartek J, Lukas C, Lukas J. Checking on DNA damage in S phase. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2004; 5:792-804; PMID:15459660; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm1493.
22. Kim ST, Lim DS, Canman CE, Kastan MB. Substrate specificities and identification of putative substrates of ATM kinase family members. J Biol Chem 1999; 274:37538-43; PMID:10608806; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.274.53.37538.
23. Sun Z, Fay DS, Marini F, Foiani M, Stern DF. Spk1/Rad53 is regulated by Mec1-dependent protein phosphorylation in DNA replication and damage checkpoint pathways. Genes Dev 1996; 10:395-406; PMID:8600024; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/ gad.10.4.395.
24. Sanchez Y, Bachant J, Wang H, Hu F, Liu D, Tetzlaff M, et al. Control of the DNA damage checkpoint by chk1 and rad53 protein kinases through distinct mechanisms. Science 1999; 286:1166-71; PMID:10550056; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/ science.286.5442.1166.
25. Matsuoka S, Huang M, Elledge SJ. Linkage of ATM to cell cycle regulation by the Chk2 protein kinase. Science 1998; 282:1893-7; PMID:9836640; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.282.5395.1893.
26. Sanchez Y, Desany BA, Jones WJ, Liu Q, Wang B, Elledge SJ. Regulation of RAD53 by the ATM-like kinases MEC1 and TEL1 in yeast cell cycle checkpoint pathways. Science 1996; 271:357-60; PMID:8553072; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/ science.271.5247.357.
27. rd, Hurov KE, Luo J, et al. ATM and ATR substrate analysis reveals extensive protein networks responsive to DNA damage. Science 2007; 316:1160-6; PMID:17525332; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1140321.
28. Zhao X, Muller EG, Rothstein R. A suppressor of two essential checkpoint genes identifies a novel protein that negatively affects dNTP pools. Mol Cell 1998; 2:329-40; PMID:9774971; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80277-4.
29. Myung K, Chen C, Kolodner RD. Multiple pathways cooperate in the suppression of genome instability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 2001; 411:1073-6; PMID:11429610; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35082608.
30. Allen JB, Zhou Z, Siede W, Friedberg EC, Elledge SJ. The SAD1/RAD53 protein kinase controls multiple checkpoints and DNA damage-induced transcription in yeast. Genes Dev 1994; 8:2401-15; PMID:7958905; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.8.20.2401.
31. Tercero JA, Longhese MP, Diffley JF. A central role for DNA replication forks in checkpoint activation and response. Mol Cell 2003; 11:1323-36; PMID:12769855; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00169-2.
32. Segurado M, Diffley JF. Separate roles for the DNA damage checkpoint protein kinases in stabilizing DNA replication forks. Genes Dev 2008; 22:1816-27; PMID:18593882; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.477208.
33. Cobb JA, Schleker T, Rojas V, Bjergbaek L, Tercero JA, Gasser SM. Replisome instability, fork collapse, and gross chromosomal rearrangements arise synergistically from Mec1 kinase and RecQ helicase mutations. Genes Dev 2005; 19:3055-69; PMID:16357221; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.361805.
34. Pasero P, Shimada K, Duncker BP. Multiple roles of replication forks in S phase checkpoints: sensors, effectors and targets. Cell Cycle 2003; 2:568-72; PMID:14512770; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.2.6.577.
35. Santocanale C, Diffley JFA. A Mec1- and Rad53-dependent checkpoint controls late-firing origins of DNA replication. Nature 1998; 395:615-8; PMID:9783589; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/27001.
36. Choi DH, Oh YM, Kwon SH, Bae SH. The mutation of a novel Saccharomyces cerevisiae SRL4 gene rescues the lethality of rad53 and lcd1 mutations by modulating dNTP levels. J Microbiol 2008; 46:75-80; PMID:18337697; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12275-008-0013-6.
37. Zhao X, Rothstein R. The Dun1 checkpoint kinase phosphorylates and regulates the ribonucleotide reductase inhibitor Sml1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002; 99:3746-51; PMID:11904430; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.062502299.
38. Zhao X, Chabes A, Domkin V, Thelander L, Rothstein R. The ribonucleotide reductase inhibitor Sml1 is a new target of the Mec1/Rad53 kinase cascade during growth and in response to DNA damage. EMBO J 2001; 20:3544-53; PMID:11432841; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/20.13.3544.
39. Sidorova JM, Breeden LL. Rad53-dependent phosphorylation of Swi6 and down-regulation of CLN1 and CLN2 transcription occur in response to DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev 1997; 11:3032-45; PMID:9367985; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.11.22.3032.
40. Kiser GL, Weinert TA. Distinct roles of yeast MEC and RAD checkpoint genes in transcriptional induction after DNA damage and implications for function. Mol Biol Cell 1996; 7:703-18; PMID:8744945.
41. Maga JA, McClanahan TA, McEntee K. Transcriptional regulation of DNA damage responsive (DDR) genes in different rad mutant strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Gen Genet 1986; 205:276-84; PMID:3100912; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1007/BF00430439.
42. Barker DG, White JH, Johnston LH. The nucleotide sequence of the DNA ligase gene (CDC9) from Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a gene which is cell-cycle regulated and induced in response to DNA damage. Nucleic Acids Res 1985; 13:8323-37; PMID:3909103; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/13.23.8323.
43. Ruby SW, Szostak JW. Specific Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes are expressed in response to DNA-damaging agents. Mol Cell Biol 1985; 5:75-84; PMID:3920512.
44. Elledge SJ, Davis RW. DNA damage induction of ribonucleotide reductase. Mol Cell Biol 1989; 9:4932-40; PMID:2513480.
45. Treger JM, Heichman KA, McEntee K. Expression of the yeast UB14 gene increases in response to DNA-damaging agents and in meiosis. Mol Cell Biol 1988; 8:1132-6; PMID:2835662.
46. Jelinsky SA, Samson LD. Global response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to an alkylating agent. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999; 96:1486-91; PMID:9990050; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.4.1486.
47. Gasch AP, Huang M, Metzner S, Botstein D, Elledge SJ, Brown PO. Genomic expression responses to DNA-damaging agents and the regulatory role of the yeast ATR homolog Mec1p. Mol Biol Cell 2001; 12:2987-3003; PMID:11598186.
48. Benton MG, Somasundaram S, Glasner JD, Palecek SP. Analyzing the dose-dependence of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae global transcriptional response to methyl methanesulfonate and ionizing radiation. BMC Genomics 2006; 7:305; PMID:17140446; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-7-305.
49. De Sanctis V, Bertozzi C, Costanzo G, Di Mauro E, Negri R. Cell cycle arrest determines the intensity of the global transcriptional response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to ionizing radiation. Radiat Res 2001; 156:379-87; PMID:11554849; http://dx.doi.org/10.1667/0033-7587(2001)156[0379:CCADTI]2.0. CO;2.
50. Fu Y, Pastushok L, Xiao W. DNA damage-induced gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2008; 32:908-26; PMID:18616603; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00126.x.
51. Travesa A, Kuo D, de Bruin RA, Kalashnikova TI, Guaderrama M, Thai K, et al. DNA replication stress differentially regulates G1/S genes via Rad53-dependent inactivation of Nrm1. EMBO J 2012; 31:1811-22; PMID:22333915; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2012.28.
52. Zaim J, Speina E, Kierzek AM. Identification of new genes regulated by the Crt1 transcription factor, an effector of the DNA damage checkpoint pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 2005; 280:28-37; PMID:15494396.
53. Wittenberg C, Reed SI. Cell cycle-dependent transcription in yeast: promoters, transcription factors, and transcriptomes. Oncogene 2005; 24:2746-55; PMID:15838511; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1208606.
54. Iyer VR, Horak CE, Scafe CS, Botstein D, Snyder M, Brown PO. Genomic binding sites of the yeast cell-cycle transcription factors SBF and MBF. Nature 2001; 409:533-8; PMID:11206552; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35054095.
55. Breeden LL. Periodic transcription: a cycle within a cycle. Curr Biol 2003; 13:R31-8; PMID:12526763; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(02)01386-6.
56. Bean JM, Siggia ED, Cross FR. High functional overlap between MluI cell-cycle box binding factor and Swi4/6 cell-cycle box binding factor in the G1/S transcriptional program in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 2005; 171:49-61; PMID:15965243; http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.105.044560.
57. Eser U, Falleur-Fettig M, Johnson A, Skotheim JM. Commitment to a cellular transition precedes genome-wide transcriptional change. Mol Cell 2011; 43:515-27; PMID:21855792; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2011.06.024.
58. Ferrezuelo F, Colomina N, Futcher B, Aldea M. The transcriptional network activated by Cln3 cyclin at the G1-to-S transition of the yeast cell cycle. Genome Biol 2010; 11:R67; PMID:20573214; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2010-11-6- r67.
59. Amon A, Tyers M, Futcher B, Nasmyth K. Mechanisms that help the yeast cell cycle clock tick: G2 cyclins transcriptionally activate G2 cyclins and repress G1 cyclins. Cell 1993; 74:993-1007; PMID:8402888; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/0092-8674(93)90722-3.
60. rd, et al. Constraining G1-specific transcription to late G1 phase: the MBF-associated corepressor Nrm1 acts via negative feedback. Mol Cell 2006; 23:483-96; PMID:16916637; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2006.06.025.
61. rd, et al. DNA replication checkpoint promotes G1-S transcription by inactivating the MBF repressor Nrm1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008; 105:11230-5; PMID:18682565; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0801106105.
62. de Bruin RA, Wittenberg C. All eukaryotes: before turning off G1-S transcription, please check your DNA. Cell Cycle 2009; 8:214-7; PMID:19158488; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.8.2.7412.
63. Simon I, Barnett J, Hannett N, Harbison CT, Rinaldi NJ, Volkert TL, et al. Serial regulation of transcriptional regulators in the yeast cell cycle. Cell 2001; 106:697-708; PMID:11572776; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(01) 00494-9.
64. Harbison CT, Gordon DB, Lee TI, Rinaldi NJ, Macisaac KD, Danford TW, et al. Transcriptional regulatory code of a eukaryotic genome. Nature 2004; 431:99-104; PMID:15343339; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature02800.
65. Sopko R, Huang D, Preston N, Chua G, Papp B, Kafadar K, et al. Mapping pathways and phenotypes by systematic gene overexpression. Mol Cell 2006; 21:319-30; PMID:16455487; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2005.12.011.
66. Yoshikawa K, Tanaka T, Ida Y, Furusawa C, Hirasawa T, Shimizu H. Comprehensive phenotypic analysis of single-gene deletion and overexpression strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 2011; 28:349-61; PMID:21341307; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/yea.1843.
67. Ström L, Lindroos HB, Shirahige K, Sjögren C. Postreplicative recruitment of cohesin to double-strand breaks is required for DNA repair. Mol Cell 2004; 16:1003-15; PMID:15610742; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2004. 11.026.
68. Harvey SL, Charlet A, Haas W, Gygi SP, Kellogg DR. Cdk1-dependent regulation of the mitotic inhibitor Wee1. Cell 2005; 122:407-20; PMID:16096060; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2005.05.029.
69. Ostapenko D, Burton JL, Wang R, Solomon MJ. Pseudosubstrate inhibition of the anaphase-promoting complex by Acm1: regulation by proteolysis and Cdc28 phosphorylation. Mol Cell Biol 2008; 28:4653-64; PMID:18519589; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00055-08.