Preventing Replication Stress to Maintain Genome Stability: Resolving Conflicts between Replication and Transcription

Molecular Cell

Volumn 45, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 710-718

  Bermejo, Rodrigo ^a,b   Lai, Mong Sing ^a   Foiani, Marco ^a,c  

^a FIRC INSTITUTE OF MOLECULAR ONCOLOGY   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SALAMANCA   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; DNA POLYMERASE; HELICASE; MESSENGER RNA; REPETITIVE DNA; RIBOSOME RNA; RNA POLYMERASE II; TRANSFER RNA;

CHROMATIN CONDENSATION; DNA HELIX; DNA STRUCTURE; DNA SUPERCOILING; EPIGENETICS; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE LOCATION; GENE LOCUS; GENE REARRANGEMENT; GENE REPLICATION; GENETIC STABILITY; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; HUMAN; NONHUMAN; REVIEW; RNA INTERFERENCE; RNA SPLICING; SISTER CHROMATID; TRANSCRIPTION INITIATION;

CHROMATIN; DNA; DNA REPLICATION; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; RNA POLYMERASE II; RNA SPLICING; TRANSCRIPTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84859042868     PISSN: 10972765     EISSN: 10974164     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.03.001     Document Type: Review

References (80)

1. Ansari A., Hampsey M. A role for the CPF 3'-end processing machinery in RNAP II-dependent gene looping. Genes Dev. 2005, 19:2969-2978.
2. Azvolinsky A., Giresi P.G., Lieb J.D., Zakian V.A. Highly transcribed RNA polymerase II genes are impediments to replication fork progression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell 2009, 34:722-734.
3. Bermejo R., Doksani Y., Capra T., Katou Y.M., Tanaka H., Shirahige K., Foiani M. Top1- and Top2-mediated topological transitions at replication forks ensure fork progression and stability and prevent DNA damage checkpoint activation. Genes Dev. 2007, 21:1921-1936.
4. Bermejo R., Branzei D., Foiani M. Cohesion by topology: sister chromatids interlocked by DNA. Genes Dev. 2008, 22:2297-2301.
5. Bermejo R., Capra T., Gonzalez-Huici V., Fachinetti D., Cocito A., Natoli G., Katou Y., Mori H., Kurokawa K., Shirahige K., Foiani M. Genome-organizing factors Top2 and Hmo1 prevent chromosome fragility at sites of S phase transcription. Cell 2009, 138:870-884.
6. Bermejo R., Capra T., Jossen R., Colosio A., Frattini C., Carotenuto W., Cocito A., Doksani Y., Klein H., Gómez-González B., et al. The replication checkpoint protects fork stability by releasing transcribed genes from nuclear pores. Cell 2011, 146:233-246.
7. Branzei D., Foiani M. Maintaining genome stability at the replication fork. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010, 11:208-219.
8. Brewer B.J. When polymerases collide: replication and the transcriptional organization of the E. coli chromosome. Cell 1988, 53:679-686.
9. Brewer B.J., Fangman W.L. A replication fork barrier at the 3' end of yeast ribosomal RNA genes. Cell 1988, 55:637-643.
10. Brickner D.G., Brickner J.H. Cdk phosphorylation of a nucleoporin controls localization of active genes through the cell cycle. Mol. Biol. Cell 2010, 21:3421-3432.
11. Brill S.J., DiNardo S., Voelkel-Meiman K., Sternglanz R. Need for DNA topoisomerase activity as a swivel for DNA replication for transcription of ribosomal RNA. Nature 1987, 326:414-416.
12. Cabal G.G., Genovesio A., Rodriguez-Navarro S., Zimmer C., Gadal O., Lesne A., Buc H., Feuerbach-Fournier F., Olivo-Marin J.C., Hurt E.C., Nehrbass U. SAGA interacting factors confine sub-diffusion of transcribed genes to the nuclear envelope. Nature 2006, 441:770-773.
13. Casolari J.M., Brown C.R., Komili S., West J., Hieronymus H., Silver P.A. Genome-wide localization of the nuclear transport machinery couples transcriptional status and nuclear organization. Cell 2004, 117:427-439.
14. Champoux J.J. DNA topoisomerases: structure, function, and mechanism. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2001, 70:369-413.
15. Chan J.N., Poon B.P., Salvi J., Olsen J.B., Emili A., Mekhail K. Perinuclear cohibin complexes maintain replicative life span via roles at distinct silent chromatin domains. Dev. Cell 2011, 20:867-879.
16. Christman M.F., Dietrich F.S., Fink G.R. Mitotic recombination in the rDNA of S. cerevisiae is suppressed by the combined action of DNA topoisomerases I and II. Cell 1988, 55:413-425.
17. Corbett K.D., Yip C.K., Ee L.S., Walz T., Amon A., Harrison S.C. The monopolin complex crosslinks kinetochore components to regulate chromosome-microtubule attachments. Cell 2010, 142:556-567.
18. Cotta-Ramusino C., Fachinetti D., Lucca C., Doksani Y., Lopes M., Sogo J., Foiani M. Exo1 processes stalled replication forks and counteracts fork reversal in checkpoint-defective cells. Mol. Cell 2005, 17:153-159.
19. Courbet S., Gay S., Arnoult N., Wronka G., Anglana M., Brison O., Debatisse M. Replication fork movement sets chromatin loop size and origin choice in mammalian cells. Nature 2008, 455:557-560.
20. Deshpande A.M., Newlon C.S. DNA replication fork pause sites dependent on transcription. Science 1996, 272:1030-1033.
21. Di Micco R., Fumagalli M., Cicalese A., Piccinin S., Gasparini P., Luise C., Schurra C., Garre' M., Nuciforo P.G., Bensimon A., et al. Oncogene-induced senescence is a DNA damage response triggered by DNA hyper-replication. Nature 2006, 444:638-642.
22. Doksani Y., Bermejo R., Fiorani S., Haber J.E., Foiani M. Replicon dynamics, dormant origin firing, and terminal fork integrity after double-strand break formation. Cell 2009, 137:247-258.
23. Dominguez-Sola D., Ying C.Y., Grandori C., Ruggiero L., Chen B., Li M., Galloway D.A., Gu W., Gautier J., Dalla-Favera R. Non-transcriptional control of DNA replication by c-Myc. Nature 2007, 448:445-451.
24. Drolet M. Growth inhibition mediated by excess negative supercoiling: the interplay between transcription elongation, R-loop formation and DNA topology. Mol. Microbiol. 2006, 59:723-730.
25. Drubin D.A., Garakani A.M., Silver P.A. Motion as a phenotype: the use of live-cell imaging and machine visual screening to characterize transcription-dependent chromosome dynamics. BMC Cell Biol. 2006, 7:19.
26. Dutta D., Shatalin K., Epshtein V., Gottesman M.E., Nudler E. Linking RNA polymerase backtracking to genome instability in E. coli. Cell 2011, 146:533-543.
27. Elías-Arnanz M., Salas M. Bacteriophage phi29 DNA replication arrest caused by codirectional collisions with the transcription machinery. EMBO J. 1997, 16:5775-5783.
28. Fachinetti D., Bermejo R., Cocito A., Minardi S., Katou Y., Kanoh Y., Shirahige K., Azvolinsky A., Zakian V.A., Foiani M. Replication termination at eukaryotic chromosomes is mediated by Top2 and occurs at genomic loci containing pausing elements. Mol. Cell 2010, 39:595-605.
29. French S.L., Sikes M.L., Hontz R.D., Osheim Y.N., Lambert T.E., El Hage A., Smith M.M., Tollervey D., Smith J.S., Beyer A.L. Distinguishing the roles of Topoisomerases I and II in relief of transcription-induced torsional stress in yeast rRNA genes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2011, 31:482-494.
30. Gamper H.B., Hearst J.E. A topological model for transcription based on unwinding angle analysis of E. coli RNA polymerase binary, initiation and ternary complexes. Cell 1982, 29:81-90.
31. Gómez-González B., Aguilera A. Activation-induced cytidine deaminase action is strongly stimulated by mutations of the THO complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104:8409-8414.
32. Gómez-González B., García-Rubio M., Bermejo R., Gaillard H., Shirahige K., Marín A., Foiani M., Aguilera A. Genome-wide function of THO/TREX in active genes prevents R-loop-dependent replication obstacles. EMBO J. 2011, 30:3106-3119.
33. Harada Y., Ohara O., Takatsuki A., Itoh H., Shimamoto N., Kinosita K. Direct observation of DNA rotation during transcription by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase. Nature 2001, 409:113-115.
34. Helmrich A., Ballarino M., Tora L. Collisions between replication and transcription complexes cause common fragile site instability at the longest human genes. Mol. Cell 2011, 44:966-977.
35. Huang J., Brito I.L., Villén J., Gygi S.P., Amon A., Moazed D. Inhibition of homologous recombination by a cohesin-associated clamp complex recruited to the rDNA recombination enhancer. Genes Dev. 2006, 20:2887-2901.
36. Huertas P., Aguilera A. Cotranscriptionally formed DNA:RNA hybrids mediate transcription elongation impairment and transcription-associated recombination. Mol. Cell 2003, 12:711-721.
37. Ivessa A.S., Lenzmeier B.A., Bessler J.B., Goudsouzian L.K., Schnakenberg S.L., Zakian V.A. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae helicase Rrm3p facilitates replication past nonhistone protein-DNA complexes. Mol. Cell 2003, 12:1525-1536.
38. Kim R.A., Wang J.C. Function of DNA topoisomerases as replication swivels in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Mol. Biol. 1989, 208:257-267.
39. Kobayashi T., Horiuchi T. A yeast gene product, Fob1 protein, required for both replication fork blocking and recombinational hotspot activities. Genes Cells 1996, 1:465-474.
40. Kogoma T. Stable DNA replication: interplay between DNA replication, homologous recombination, and transcription. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 1997, 61:212-238.
41. Koster D.A., Crut A., Shuman S., Bjornsti M.A., Dekker N.H. Cellular strategies for regulating DNA supercoiling: a single-molecule perspective. Cell 2010, 142:519-530.
42. Lallemand-Breitenbach V., de Thé H. PML nuclear bodies. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2010, 2:a000661.
43. Lemaitre J.M., Danis E., Pasero P., Vassetzky Y., Méchali M. Mitotic remodeling of the replicon and chromosome structure. Cell 2005, 123:787-801.
44. Light W.H., Brickner D.G., Brand V.R., Brickner J.H. Interaction of a DNA zip code with the nuclear pore complex promotes H2A.Z incorporation and INO1 transcriptional memory. Mol. Cell 2010, 40:112-125.
45. Liu B., Alberts B.M. Head-on collision between a DNA replication apparatus and RNA polymerase transcription complex. Science 1995, 267:1131-1137.
46. Liu L.F., Wang J.C. Supercoiling of the DNA template during transcription. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1987, 84:7024-7027.
47. Lopes M., Cotta-Ramusino C., Pellicioli A., Liberi G., Plevani P., Muzi-Falconi M., Newlon C.S., Foiani M. The DNA replication checkpoint response stabilizes stalled replication forks. Nature 2001, 412:557-561.
48. Lopes M., Cotta-Ramusino C., Liberi G., Foiani M. Branch migrating sister chromatid junctions form at replication origins through Rad51/Rad52-independent mechanisms. Mol. Cell 2003, 12:1499-1510.
49. Lucca C., Vanoli F., Cotta-Ramusino C., Pellicioli A., Liberi G., Haber J., Foiani M. Checkpoint-mediated control of replisome-fork association and signalling in response to replication pausing. Oncogene 2004, 23:1206-1213.
50. Matsuoka S., Ballif B.A., Smogorzewska A., McDonald E.R., Hurov K.E., Luo J., Bakalarski C.E., Zhao Z., Solimini N., Lerenthal Y., et al. ATM and ATR substrate analysis reveals extensive protein networks responsive to DNA damage. Science 2007, 316:1160-1166.
51. Mekhail K., Seebacher J., Gygi S.P., Moazed D. Role for perinuclear chromosome tethering in maintenance of genome stability. Nature 2008, 456:667-670.
52. Olavarrieta L., Hernández P., Krimer D.B., Schvartzman J.B. DNA knotting caused by head-on collision of transcription and replication. J. Mol. Biol. 2002, 322:1-6.
53. Park H., Sternglanz R. Identification and characterization of the genes for two topoisomerase I-interacting proteins from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 1999, 15:35-41.
54. Paulsen R.D., Soni D.V., Wollman R., Hahn A.T., Yee M.C., Guan A., Hesley J.A., Miller S.C., Cromwell E.F., Solow-Cordero D.E., et al. A genome-wide siRNA screen reveals diverse cellular processes and pathways that mediate genome stability. Mol. Cell 2009, 35:228-239.
55. Perkins K.J., Lusic M., Mitar I., Giacca M., Proudfoot N.J. Transcription-dependent gene looping of the HIV-1 provirus is dictated by recognition of pre-mRNA processing signals. Mol. Cell 2008, 29:56-68.
56. Phoenix P., Raymond M.A., Massé E., Drolet M. Roles of DNA topoisomerases in the regulation of R-loop formation in vitro. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272:1473-1479.
57. Pomerantz R.T., O'Donnell M. The replisome uses mRNA as a primer after colliding with RNA polymerase. Nature 2008, 456:762-766.
58. Postow L., Crisona N.J., Peter B.J., Hardy C.D., Cozzarelli N.R. Topological challenges to DNA replication: conformations at the fork. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98:8219-8226.
59. Postow L., Ullsperger C., Keller R.W., Bustamante C., Vologodskii A.V., Cozzarelli N.R. Positive torsional strain causes the formation of a four-way junction at replication forks. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276:2790-2796.
60. Raghuraman M.K., Winzeler E.A., Collingwood D., Hunt S., Wodicka L., Conway A., Lockhart D.J., Davis R.W., Brewer B.J., Fangman W.L. Replication dynamics of the yeast genome. Science 2001, 294:115-121.
61. Reyes-Lamothe R., Possoz C., Danilova O., Sherratt D.J. Independent positioning and action of Escherichia coli replisomes in live cells. Cell 2008, 133:90-102.
62. Roca J. The torsional state of DNA within the chromosome. Chromosoma 2011, 120:323-334.
63. Rocha E.P. The replication-related organization of bacterial genomes. Microbiology 2004, 150:1609-1627.
64. Rougemaille M., Dieppois G., Kisseleva-Romanova E., Gudipati R.K., Lemoine S., Blugeon C., Boulay J., Jensen T.H., Stutz F., Devaux F., Libri D. THO/Sub2p functions to coordinate 3'-end processing with gene-nuclear pore association. Cell 2008, 135:308-321.
65. Roy D., Lieber M.R. G clustering is important for the initiation of transcription-induced R-loops in vitro, whereas high G density without clustering is sufficient thereafter. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2009, 29:3124-3133.
66. Schvartzman J.B., Stasiak A. A topological view of the replicon. EMBO Rep. 2004, 5:256-261.
67. Semerad C.L., Mercer E.M., Inlay M.A., Weissman I.L., Murre C. E2A proteins maintain the hematopoietic stem cell pool and promote the maturation of myelolymphoid and myeloerythroid progenitors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106:1930-1935.
68. Sogo J.M., Lopes M., Foiani M. Fork reversal and ssDNA accumulation at stalled replication forks owing to checkpoint defects. Science 2002, 297:599-602.
69. Srivatsan A., Tehranchi A., MacAlpine D.M., Wang J.D. Co-orientation of replication and transcription preserves genome integrity. PLoS Genet. 2010, 6:e1000810.
70. Tadros W., Lipshitz H.D. The maternal-to-zygotic transition: a play in two acts. Development 2009, 136:3033-3042.
71. Tan-Wong S.M., Wijayatilake H.D., Proudfoot N.J. Gene loops function to maintain transcriptional memory through interaction with the nuclear pore complex. Genes Dev. 2009, 23:2610-2624.
72. Thomas M., White R.L., Davis R.W. Hybridization of RNA to double-stranded DNA: formation of R-loops. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1976, 73:2294-2298.
73. Tuduri S., Crabbé L., Conti C., Tourrière H., Holtgreve-Grez H., Jauch A., Pantesco V., De Vos J., Thomas A., Theillet C., et al. Topoisomerase I suppresses genomic instability by preventing interference between replication and transcription. Nat. Cell Biol. 2009, 11:1315-1324.
74. Wahba L., Amon J.D., Koshland D., Vuica-Ross M. RNase H and multiple RNA biogenesis factors cooperate to prevent RNA:DNA hybrids from generating genome instability. Mol. Cell 2011, 44:978-988.
75. Wang J.C. Cellular roles of DNA topoisomerases: a molecular perspective. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2002, 3:430-440.
76. Wang J.C., Caron P.R., Kim R.A. The role of DNA topoisomerases in recombination and genome stability: a double-edged sword?. Cell 1990, 62:403-406.
77. Wang J.D., Berkmen M.B., Grossman A.D. Genome-wide coorientation of replication and transcription reduces adverse effects on replication in Bacillus subtilis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104:5608-5613.
78. Wang X., Reyes-Lamothe R., Sherratt D.J. Modulation of Escherichia coli sister chromosome cohesion by topoisomerase IV. Genes Dev. 2008, 22:2426-2433.
79. Winey M., Yarar D., Giddings T.H., Mastronarde D.N. Nuclear pore complex number and distribution throughout the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell cycle by three-dimensional reconstruction from electron micrographs of nuclear envelopes. Mol. Biol. Cell 1997, 8:2119-2132.
80. Wu H.Y., Shyy S.H., Wang J.C., Liu L.F. Transcription generates positively and negatively supercoiled domains in the template. Cell 1988, 53:433-440.