Perspectives on the DNA damage and replication checkpoint responses in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

DNA Repair

Volumn 8, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 974-982

  Putnam, Christopher D ^a   Jaehnig, Eric J ^a   Kolodner, Richard D ^a  

^a LUDWIG INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Cell cycle checkpoint; DNA damage; DNA repair; Genome stability; Positive feedback; Transcriptional response

Indexed keywords

ATM PROTEIN; ATR PROTEIN; CHECKPOINT KINASE 1; CHECKPOINT KINASE 2; DNA; MEC 1 PROTEIN; PROTEIN TEL 1; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE ARREST; CELL CYCLE PROGRESSION; CELL CYCLE S PHASE; CHROMATIN; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; NONHUMAN; POSITIVE FEEDBACK; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; STRUCTURAL HOMOLOGY; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION;

CELL CYCLE; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPLICATION; FEEDBACK, PHYSIOLOGICAL; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 68249099217     PISSN: 15687864     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2009.04.021     Document Type: Article

References (137)

1. Weinert T.A., and Hartwell L.H. The RAD9 gene controls the cell cycle response to DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 241 (1988) 317-322
2. Siede W., Friedberg A.S., and Friedberg E.C. RAD9-dependent G1 arrest defines a second checkpoint for damaged DNA in the cell cycle of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 90 (1993) 7985-7989
3. Santocanale C., and Diffley J.F. A Mec1- and Rad53-dependent checkpoint controls late-firing origins of DNA replication. Nature 395 (1998) 615-618
4. Paulovich A.G., Margulies R.U., Garvik B.M., and Hartwell L.H. RAD9, RAD17, and RAD24 are required for S phase regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae in response to DNA damage. Genetics 145 (1997) 45-62
5. Myung K., and Kolodner R.D. Suppression of genome instability by redundant S-phase checkpoint pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99 (2002) 4500-4507
6. Zou L., and Elledge S.J. Sensing DNA damage through ATRIP recognition of RPA-ssDNA complexes. Science 300 (2003) 1542-1548
7. Nakada D., Matsumoto K., and Sugimoto K. ATM-related Tel1 associates with double-strand breaks through an Xrs2-dependent mechanism. Genes Dev. 17 (2003) 1957-1962
8. Ritchie K.B., Mallory J.C., and Petes T.D. Interactions of TLC1 (which encodes the RNA subunit of telomerase), TEL1, and MEC1 in regulating telomere length in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell Biol. 19 (1999) 6065-6075
9. Chan S.W., Chang J., Prescott J., and Blackburn E.H. Altering telomere structure allows telomerase to act in yeast lacking ATM kinases. Curr. Biol. 11 (2001) 1240-1250
10. Morrow D.M., Tagle D.A., Shiloh Y., Collins F.S., and Hieter P. TEL1, an S. cerevisiae homolog of the human gene mutated in ataxia telangiectasia, is functionally related to the yeast checkpoint gene MEC1. Cell 82 (1995) 831-840
11. Downs J.A., Lowndes N.F., and Jackson S.P. A role for Saccharomyces cerevisiae histone H2A in DNA repair. Nature 408 (2000) 1001-1004
12. Lustig A.J., and Petes T.D. Identification of yeast mutants with altered telomere structure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 83 (1986) 1398-1402
13. Ira G., Pellicioli A., Balijja A., Wang X., Fiorani S., Carotenuto W., Liberi G., Bressan D., Wan L., Hollingsworth N.M., Haber J.E., and Foiani M. DNA end resection, homologous recombination and DNA damage checkpoint activation require CDK1. Nature 431 (2004) 1011-1017
14. Huertas P., Cortes-Ledesma F., Sartori A.A., Aguilera A., and Jackson S.P. CDK targets Sae2 to control DNA-end resection and homologous recombination. Nature 455 (2008) 689-692
15. Kondo T., Wakayama T., Naiki T., Matsumoto K., and Sugimoto K. Recruitment of Mec1 and Ddc1 checkpoint proteins to double-strand breaks through distinct mechanisms. Science 294 (2001) 867-870
16. Melo J.A., Cohen J., and Toczyski D.P. Two checkpoint complexes are independently recruited to sites of DNA damage in vivo. Genes Dev. 15 (2001) 2809-2821
17. Majka J., Niedziela-Majka A., and Burgers P.M. The checkpoint clamp activates Mec1 kinase during initiation of the DNA damage checkpoint. Mol. Cell 24 (2006) 891-901
18. Bonilla C.Y., Melo J.A., and Toczyski D.P. Colocalization of sensors is sufficient to activate the DNA damage checkpoint in the absence of damage. Mol. Cell 30 (2008) 267-276
19. Lydall D. Hiding at the ends of yeast chromosomes: telomeres, nucleases and checkpoint pathways. J. Cell Sci. 116 (2003) 4057-4065
20. Mordes D.A., Nam E.A., and Cortez D. Dpb11 activates the Mec1-Ddc2 complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105 (2008) 18730-18734
21. Navadgi-Patil V.M., and Burgers P.M. Yeast DNA replication protein Dpb11 activates the Mec1/ATR checkpoint kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 283 (2008) 35853-35859
22. Delacroix S., Wagner J.M., Kobayashi M., Yamamoto K., and Karnitz L.M. The Rad9-Hus1-Rad1 (9-1-1) clamp activates checkpoint signaling via TopBP1. Genes Dev. 21 (2007) 1472-1477
23. Furuya K., Poitelea M., Guo L., Caspari T., and Carr A.M. Chk1 activation requires Rad9 S/TQ-site phosphorylation to promote association with C-terminal BRCT domains of Rad4TOPBP1. Genes Dev. 18 (2004) 1154-1164
24. Lee J., Kumagai A., and Dunphy W.G. The Rad9-Hus1-Rad1 checkpoint clamp regulates interaction of TopBP1 with ATR. J. Biol. Chem. 282 (2007) 28036-28044
25. Amon A., Surana U., Muroff I., and Nasmyth K. Regulation of p34CDC28 tyrosine phosphorylation is not required for entry into mitosis in S. cerevisiae. Nature 355 (1992) 368-371
26. Sorger P.K., and Murray A.W. S-phase feedback control in budding yeast independent of tyrosine phosphorylation of p34cdc28. Nature 355 (1992) 365-368
27. Emili A., Schieltz D.M., Yates J.R., and Hartwell III L.H. Dynamic interaction of DNA damage checkpoint protein Rad53 with chromatin assembly factor Asf1. Mol. Cell 7 (2001) 13-20
28. Hu F., Alcasabas A.A., and Elledge S.J. Asf1 links Rad53 to control of chromatin assembly. Genes Dev. 15 (2001) 1061-1066
29. Sharp J.A., Rizki G., and Kaufman P.D. Regulation of histone deposition proteins Asf1/Hir1 by multiple DNA damage checkpoint kinases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 171 (2005) 885-899
30. Chen C.C., Carson J.J., Feser J., Tamburini B., Zabaronick S., Linger J., and Tyler J.K. Acetylated lysine 56 on histone H3 drives chromatin assembly after repair and signals for the completion of repair. Cell 134 (2008) 231-243
31. Alcasabas A.A., Osborn A.J., Bachant J., Hu F., Werler P.J., Bousset K., Furuya K., Diffley J.F., Carr A.M., and Elledge S.J. Mrc1 transduces signals of DNA replication stress to activate Rad53. Nat. Cell Biol. 3 (2001) 958-965
32. Schwartz M.F., Duong J.K., Sun Z., Morrow J.S., Pradhan D., and Stern D.F. Rad9 phosphorylation sites couple Rad53 to the Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA damage checkpoint. Mol. Cell 9 (2002) 1055-1065
33. Osborn A.J., and Elledge S.J. Mrc1 is a replication fork component whose phosphorylation in response to DNA replication stress activates Rad53. Genes Dev. 17 (2003) 1755-1767
34. Lee S.J., Duong J.K., and Stern D.F. A Ddc2-Rad53 fusion protein can bypass the requirements for RAD9 and MRC1 in Rad53 activation. Mol. Biol. Cell 15 (2004) 5443-5455
35. Tanaka K., and Russell P. Cds1 phosphorylation by Rad3-Rad26 kinase is mediated by forkhead-associated domain interaction with Mrc1. J. Biol. Chem. 279 (2004) 32079-32086
36. Katou Y., Kanoh Y., Bando M., Noguchi H., Tanaka H., Ashikari T., Sugimoto K., and Shirahige K. S-phase checkpoint proteins Tof1 and Mrc1 form a stable replication-pausing complex. Nature 424 (2003) 1078-1083
37. Soulier J., and Lowndes N.F. The BRCT domain of the S. cerevisiae checkpoint protein Rad9 mediates a Rad9-Rad9 interaction after DNA damage. Curr. Biol. 9 (1999) 551-554
38. Hammet A., Magill C., Heierhorst J., and Jackson S.P. Rad9 BRCT domain interaction with phosphorylated H2AX regulates the G1 checkpoint in budding yeast. EMBO Rep. 8 (2007) 851-857
39. Grenon M., Costelloe T., Jimeno S., O'Shaughnessy A., Fitzgerald J., Zgheib O., Degerth L., and Lowndes N.F. Docking onto chromatin via the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad9 Tudor domain. Yeast 24 (2007) 105-119
40. Giannattasio M., Lazzaro F., Plevani P., and Muzi-Falconi M. The DNA damage checkpoint response requires histone H2B ubiquitination by Rad6-Bre1 and H3 methylation by Dot1. J. Biol. Chem. 280 (2005) 9879-9886
41. Wysocki R., Javaheri A., Allard S., Sha F., Cote J., and Kron S.J. Role of Dot1-dependent histone H3 methylation in G1 and S phase DNA damage checkpoint functions of Rad9. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25 (2005) 8430-8443
42. Puddu F., Granata M., Di Nola L., Balestrini A., Piergiovanni G., Lazzaro F., Giannattasio M., Plevani P., and Muzi-Falconi M. Phosphorylation of the budding yeast 9-1-1 complex is required for Dpb11 function in the full activation of the UV-induced DNA damage checkpoint. Mol. Cell Biol. 28 (2008) 4782-4793
43. Carballo J.A., Johnson A.L., Sedgwick S.G., and Cha R.S. Phosphorylation of the axial element protein Hop1 by Mec1/Tel1 ensures meiotic interhomolog recombination. Cell 132 (2008) 758-770
44. Bashkirov V.I., Bashkirova E.V., Haghnazari E., and Heyer W.D. Direct kinase-to-kinase signaling mediated by the FHA phosphoprotein recognition domain of the Dun1 DNA damage checkpoint kinase. Mol. Cell Biol. 23 (2003) 1441-1452
45. Chen S.H., Smolka M.B., and Zhou H. Mechanism of Dun1 activation by Rad53 phosphorylation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 282 (2007) 986-995
46. Zhao X., and Rothstein R. The Dun1 checkpoint kinase phosphorylates and regulates the ribonucleotide reductase inhibitor Sml1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99 (2002) 3746-3751
47. Zhao X., Muller E.G., and Rothstein R. A suppressor of two essential checkpoint genes identifies a novel protein that negatively affects dNTP pools. Mol. Cell 2 (1998) 329-340
48. Smolka M.B., Chen S.H., Maddox P.S., Enserink J.M., Albuquerque C.P., Wei X.X., Desai A., Kolodner R.D., and Zhou H. An FHA domain-mediated protein interaction network of Rad53 reveals its role in polarized cell growth. J. Cell Biol. 175 (2006) 743-753
49. Smolka M.B., Albuquerque C.P., Chen S.H., and Zhou H. Proteome-wide identification of in vivo targets of DNA damage checkpoint kinases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104 (2007) 10364-10369
50. Sanchez Y., Bachant J., Wang H., Hu F., Liu D., Tetzlaff M., and Elledge S.J. Control of the DNA damage checkpoint by chk1 and rad53 protein kinases through distinct mechanisms. Science 286 (1999) 1166-1171
51. Agarwal R., Tang Z., Yu H., and Cohen-Fix O. Two distinct pathways for inhibiting pds1 ubiquitination in response to DNA damage. J. Biol. Chem. 278 (2003) 45027-45033
52. Liang F., and Wang Y. DNA damage checkpoints inhibit mitotic exit by two different mechanisms. Mol. Cell Biol. 27 (2007) 5067-5078
53. Visintin R., Craig K., Hwang E.S., Prinz S., Tyers M., and Amon A. The phosphatase Cdc14 triggers mitotic exit by reversal of Cdk-dependent phosphorylation. Mol. Cell 2 (1998) 709-718
54. Clemenson C., and Marsolier-Kergoat M.C. The spindle assembly checkpoint regulates the phosphorylation state of a subset of DNA checkpoint proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell Biol. 26 (2006) 9149-9161
55. Duncker B.P., and Brown G.W. Cdc7 kinases (DDKs) and checkpoint responses: lessons from two yeasts. Mutat. Res. 532 (2003) 21-27
56. Cheng L., Collyer T., and Hardy C.F. Cell cycle regulation of DNA replication initiator factor Dbf4p. Mol. Cell Biol. 19 (1999) 4270-4278
57. Weinreich M., and Stillman B. Cdc7p-Dbf4p kinase binds to chromatin during S phase and is regulated by both the APC and the RAD53 checkpoint pathway. EMBO J. 18 (1999) 5334-5346
58. Ogi H., Wang C.Z., Nakai W., Kawasaki Y., and Masumoto H. The role of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Cdc7-Dbf4 complex in the replication checkpoint. Gene 414 (2008) 32-40
59. Takeda T., Ogino K., Tatebayashi K., Ikeda H., Arai K., and Masai H. Regulation of initiation of S phase, replication checkpoint signaling, and maintenance of mitotic chromosome structures during S phase by Hsk1 kinase in the fission yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell 12 (2001) 1257-1274
60. Shimada K., Pasero P., and Gasser S.M. ORC and the intra-S-phase checkpoint: a threshold regulates Rad53p activation in S phase. Genes Dev. 16 (2002) 3236-3252
61. Pessoa-Brandao L., and Sclafani R.A. CDC7/DBF4 functions in the translesion synthesis branch of the RAD6 epistasis group in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 167 (2004) 1597-1610
62. Herzberg K., Bashkirov V.I., Rolfsmeier M., Haghnazari E., McDonald W.H., Anderson S., Bashkirova E.V., Yates III J.R., and Heyer W.D. Phosphorylation of Rad55 on serines 2, 8 and 14 is required for efficient homologous recombination in the recovery of stalled replication forks. Mol. Cell Biol. 26 (2006) 8396-8409
63. Rouse J. Esc4p, a new target of Mec1p (ATR), promotes resumption of DNA synthesis after DNA damage. EMBO J. 23 (2004) 1188-1197
64. Roberts T.M., Kobor M.S., Bastin-Shanower S.A., Ii M., Horte S.A., Gin J.W., Emili A., Rine J., Brill S.J., and Brown G.W. Slx4 regulates DNA damage checkpoint-dependent phosphorylation of the BRCT domain protein Rtt107/Esc4. Mol. Biol. Cell 17 (2006) 539-548
65. Ahnesorg P., and Jackson S.P. The non-homologous end-joining protein Nej1p is a target of the DNA damage checkpoint. DNA Repair (Amst.) 6 (2007) 190-201
66. Bartrand A.J., Iyasu D., Marinco S.M., and Brush G.S. Evidence of meiotic crossover control in Saccharomyces cerevisiae through Mec1-mediated phosphorylation of replication protein A. Genetics 172 (2006) 27-39
67. Brush G.S., and Kelly T.J. Phosphorylation of the replication protein A large subunit in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae checkpoint response. Nucleic Acids Res. 28 (2000) 3725-3732
68. Mallory J.C., Bashkirov V.I., Trujillo K.M., Solinger J.A., Dominska M., Sung P., Heyer W.D., and Petes T.D. Amino acid changes in Xrs2p, Dun1p, and Rfa2p that remove the preferred targets of the ATM family of protein kinases do not affect DNA repair or telomere length in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. DNA Repair (Amst.) 2 (2003) 1041-1064
69. D'Amours D., and Jackson S.P. The yeast Xrs2 complex functions in S phase checkpoint regulation. Genes Dev. 15 (2001) 2238-2249
70. Sutton M.D., Smith B.T., Godoy V.G., and Walker G.C. The SOS response: recent insights into umuDC-dependent mutagenesis and DNA damage tolerance. Annu. Rev. Genet. 34 (2000) 479-497
71. Downs J.A., Allard S., Jobin-Robitaille O., Javaheri A., Auger A., Bouchard N., Kron S.J., Jackson S.P., and Cote J. Binding of chromatin-modifying activities to phosphorylated histone H2A at DNA damage sites. Mol. Cell 16 (2004) 979-990
72. Franco S., Gostissa M., Zha S., Lombard D.B., Murphy M.M., Zarrin A.A., Yan C., Tepsuporn S., Morales J.C., Adams M.M., Lou Z., Bassing C.H., Manis J.P., Chen J., Carpenter P.B., and Alt F.W. H2AX prevents DNA breaks from progressing to chromosome breaks and translocations. Mol. Cell 21 (2006) 201-214
73. Myung K., Pennaneach V., Kats E.S., and Kolodner R.D. Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromatin-assembly factors that act during DNA replication function in the maintenance of genome stability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100 (2003) 6640-6645
74. Morrison A.J., Highland J., Krogan N.J., Arbel-Eden A., Greenblatt J.F., Haber J.E., and Shen X. INO80 and gamma-H2AX interaction links ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling to DNA damage repair. Cell 119 (2004) 767-775
75. van Attikum H., Fritsch O., Hohn B., and Gasser S.M. Recruitment of the INO80 complex by H2A phosphorylation links ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling with DNA double-strand break repair. Cell 119 (2004) 777-788
76. Papamichos-Chronakis M., Krebs J.E., and Peterson C.L. Interplay between Ino80 and Swr1 chromatin remodeling enzymes regulates cell cycle checkpoint adaptation in response to DNA damage. Genes Dev. 20 (2006) 2437-2449
77. van Attikum H., Fritsch O., and Gasser S.M. Distinct roles for SWR1 and INO80 chromatin remodeling complexes at chromosomal double-strand breaks. EMBO J. 26 (2007) 4113-4125
78. Javaheri A., Wysocki R., Jobin-Robitaille O., Altaf M., Cote J., and Kron S.J. Yeast G1 DNA damage checkpoint regulation by H2A phosphorylation is independent of chromatin remodeling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103 (2006) 13771-13776
79. Morrison A.J., Kim J.A., Person M.D., Highland J., Xiao J., Wehr T.S., Hensley S., Bao Y., Shen J., Collins S.R., Weissman J.S., Delrow J., Krogan N.J., Haber J.E., and Shen X. Mec1/Tel1 phosphorylation of the INO80 chromatin remodeling complex influences DNA damage checkpoint responses. Cell 130 (2007) 499-511
80. Strom L., Lindroos H.B., Shirahige K., and Sjogren C. Postreplicative recruitment of cohesin to double-strand breaks is required for DNA repair. Mol. Cell 16 (2004) 1003-1015
81. Unal E., Arbel-Eden A., Sattler U., Shroff R., Lichten M., Haber J.E., and Koshland D. DNA damage response pathway uses histone modification to assemble a double-strand break-specific cohesin domain. Mol. Cell 16 (2004) 991-1002
82. Strom L., Karlsson C., Lindroos H.B., Wedahl S., Katou Y., Shirahige K., and Sjogren C. Postreplicative formation of cohesion is required for repair and induced by a single DNA break. Science 317 (2007) 242-245
83. Unal E., Heidinger-Pauli J.M., and Koshland D. DNA double-strand breaks trigger genome-wide sister-chromatid cohesion through Eco1 (Ctf7). Science 317 (2007) 245-248
84. Brands A., and Skibbens R.V. Ctf7p/Eco1p exhibits acetyltransferase activity-but does it matter?. Curr. Biol. 15 (2005) R50-51
85. Heidinger-Pauli J.M., Unal E., Guacci V., and Koshland D. The kleisin subunit of cohesin dictates damage-induced cohesion. Mol. Cell 31 (2008) 47-56
86. Demeter J., Lee S.E., Haber J.E., and Stearns T. The DNA damage checkpoint signal in budding yeast is nuclear limited. Mol. Cell 6 (2000) 487-492
87. Enserink J.M., Smolka M.B., Zhou H., and Kolodner R.D. Checkpoint proteins control morphogenetic events during DNA replication stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol. 175 (2006) 729-741
88. Dotiwala F., Haase J., Arbel-Eden A., Bloom K., and Haber J.E. The yeast DNA damage checkpoint proteins control a cytoplasmic response to DNA damage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104 (2007) 11358-11363
89. Gasch A.P., Huang M., Metzner S., Botstein D., Elledge S.J., and Brown P.O. Genomic expression responses to DNA-damaging agents and the regulatory role of the yeast ATR homolog Mec1p. Mol. Biol. Cell 12 (2001) 2987-3003
90. Huang M., Zhou Z., and Elledge S.J. The DNA replication and damage checkpoint pathways induce transcription by inhibition of Crt1 repressor. Cell 94 (1998) 595-605
91. Kim E.M., Jang Y.K., and Park S.D. Phosphorylation of Rph1, a damage-responsive repressor of PHR1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, is dependent upon Rad53 kinase. Nucleic Acids Res. 30 (2002) 643-648
92. Zhu Y., and Xiao W. Two alternative cell cycle checkpoint pathways differentially control DNA damage-dependent induction of MAG1 and DDI1 expression in yeast. Mol. Genet. Genomics 266 (2001) 436-444
93. Zhu Y., and Xiao W. Differential regulation of two closely clustered yeast genes, MAG1 and DDI1, by cell-cycle checkpoints. Nucleic Acids Res. 26 (1998) 5402-5408
94. Fu Y., Zhu Y., Zhang K., Yeung M., Durocher D., and Xiao W. Rad6-Rad18 mediates a eukaryotic SOS response by ubiquitinating the 9-1-1 checkpoint clamp. Cell 133 (2008) 601-611
95. Sidorova J.M., and Breeden L.L. Rad53-dependent phosphorylation of Swi6 and down-regulation of CLN1 and CLN2 transcription occur in response to DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 11 (1997) 3032-3045
96. Sidorova J.M., and Breeden L.L. Rad53 checkpoint kinase phosphorylation site preference identified in the Swi6 protein of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell Biol. 23 (2003) 3405-3416
97. Birrell G.W., Brown J.A., Wu H.I., Giaever G., Chu A.M., Davis R.W., and Brown J.M. Transcriptional response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to DNA-damaging agents does not identify the genes that protect against these agents. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99 (2002) 8778-8783
98. Jelinsky S.A., Estep P., Church G.M., and Samson L.D. Regulatory networks revealed by transcriptional profiling of damaged Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells: Rpn4 links base excision repair with proteasomes. Mol. Cell Biol. 20 (2000) 8157-8167
99. Workman C.T., Mak H.C., McCuine S., Tagne J.B., Agarwal M., Ozier O., Begley T.J., Samson L.D., and Ideker T. A systems approach to mapping DNA damage response pathways. Science 312 (2006) 1054-1059
100. Spellman P.T., Sherlock G., Zhang M.Q., Iyer V.R., Anders K., Eisen M.B., Brown P.O., Botstein D., and Futcher B. Comprehensive identification of cell cycle-regulated genes of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae by microarray hybridization. Mol. Biol. Cell 9 (1998) 3273-3297
101. Gasch A.P., Spellman P.T., Kao C.M., Carmel-Harel O., Eisen M.B., Storz G., Botstein D., and Brown P.O. Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. Mol. Biol. Cell 11 (2000) 4241-4257
102. Burgis N.E., and Samson L.D. The protein degradation response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to classical DNA-damaging agents. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 20 (2007) 1843-1853
103. Mattimore V., and Battista J.R. Radioresistance of Deinococcus radiodurans: functions necessary to survive ionizing radiation are also necessary to survive prolonged desiccation. J. Bacteriol. 178 (1996) 633-637
104. Desany B.A., Alcasabas A.A., Bachant J.B., and Elledge S.J. Recovery from DNA replicational stress is the essential function of the S-phase checkpoint pathway. Genes Dev. 12 (1998) 2956-2970
105. Tercero J.A., and Diffley J.F. Regulation of DNA replication fork progression through damaged DNA by the Mec1/Rad53 checkpoint. Nature 412 (2001) 553-557
106. Raveendranathan M., Chattopadhyay S., Bolon Y.T., Haworth J., Clarke D.J., and Bielinsky A.K. Genome-wide replication profiles of S-phase checkpoint mutants reveal fragile sites in yeast. EMBO J. 25 (2006) 3627-3639
107. Cha R.S., and Kleckner N. ATR homolog Mec1 promotes fork progression, thus averting breaks in replication slow zones. Science 297 (2002) 602-606
108. Araki H., Leem S.H., Phongdara A., and Sugino A. Dpb11, which interacts with DNA polymerase II(epsilon) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, has a dual role in S-phase progression and at a cell cycle checkpoint. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 92 (1995) 11791-11795
109. Marini F., Pellicioli A., Paciotti V., Lucchini G., Plevani P., Stern D.F., and Foiani M. A role for DNA primase in coupling DNA replication to DNA damage response. EMBO J. 16 (1997) 639-650
110. Sugimoto K., Ando S., Shimomura T., and Matsumoto K. Rfc5, a replication factor C component, is required for regulation of Rad53 protein kinase in the yeast checkpoint pathway. Mol. Cell Biol. 17 (1997) 5905-5914
111. Torres-Rosell J., De Piccoli G., Cordon-Preciado V., Farmer S., Jarmuz A., Machin F., Pasero P., Lisby M., Haber J.E., and Aragon L. Anaphase onset before complete DNA replication with intact checkpoint responses. Science 315 (2007) 1411-1415
112. Allen J.B., Zhou Z., Siede W., Friedberg E.C., and Elledge S.J. The SAD1/RAD53 protein kinase controls multiple checkpoints and DNA damage-induced transcription in yeast. Genes Dev. 8 (1994) 2401-2415
113. Sogo J.M., Lopes M., and Foiani M. Fork reversal and ssDNA accumulation at stalled replication forks owing to checkpoint defects. Science 297 (2002) 599-602
114. Nedelcheva M.N., Roguev A., Dolapchiev L.B., Shevchenko A., Taskov H.B., Shevchenko A., Stewart A.F., and Stoynov S.S. Uncoupling of unwinding from DNA synthesis implies regulation of MCM helicase by Tof1/Mrc1/Csm3 checkpoint complex. J. Mol. Biol. 347 (2005) 509-521
115. Nitani N., Nakamura K., Nakagawa C., Masukata H., and Nakagawa T. Regulation of DNA replication machinery by Mrc1 in fission yeast. Genetics 174 (2006) 155-165
116. Calzada A., Hodgson B., Kanemaki M., Bueno A., and Labib K. Molecular anatomy and regulation of a stable replisome at a paused eukaryotic DNA replication fork. Genes Dev. 19 (2005) 1905-1919
117. Arias E.E., and Walter J.C. Strength in numbers: preventing rereplication via multiple mechanisms in eukaryotic cells. Genes Dev. 21 (2007) 497-518
118. Labib K., Tercero J.A., and Diffley J.F. Uninterrupted MCM2-7 function required for DNA replication fork progression. Science 288 (2000) 1643-1647
119. Sandler S.J., and Marians K.J. Role of PriA in replication fork reactivation in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 182 (2000) 9-13
120. Raghuraman M.K., Winzeler E.A., Collingwood D., Hunt S., Wodicka L., Conway A., Lockhart D.J., Davis R.W., Brewer B.J., and Fangman W.L. Replication dynamics of the yeast genome. Science 294 (2001) 115-121
121. Mitrophanov A.Y., and Groisman E.A. Positive feedback in cellular control systems. Bioessays 30 (2008) 542-555
122. Skotheim J.M., Di Talia S., Siggia E.D., and Cross F.R. Positive feedback of G1 cyclins ensures coherent cell cycle entry. Nature 454 (2008) 291-296
123. Holt L.J., Krutchinsky A.N., and Morgan D.O. Positive feedback sharpens the anaphase switch. Nature 454 (2008) 353-357
124. Lou Z., Minter-Dykhouse K., Franco S., Gostissa M., Rivera M.A., Celeste A., Manis J.P., van Deursen J., Nussenzweig A., Paull T.T., Alt F.W., and Chen J. MDC1 maintains genomic stability by participating in the amplification of ATM-dependent DNA damage signals. Mol. Cell 21 (2006) 187-200
125. Soutoglou E., and Misteli T. Activation of the cellular DNA damage response in the absence of DNA lesions. Science 320 (2008) 1507-1510
126. O'Neill B.M., Szyjka S.J., Lis E.T., Bailey A.O., Yates III J.R., Aparicio O.M., and Romesberg F.E. Pph3-Psy2 is a phosphatase complex required for Rad53 dephosphorylation and replication fork restart during recovery from DNA damage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104 (2007) 9290-9295
127. Keogh M.C., Kim J.A., Downey M., Fillingham J., Chowdhury D., Harrison J.C., Onishi M., Datta N., Galicia S., Emili A., Lieberman J., Shen X., Buratowski S., Haber J.E., Durocher D., Greenblatt J.F., and Krogan N.J. A phosphatase complex that dephosphorylates gammaH2AX regulates DNA damage checkpoint recovery. Nature 439 (2006) 497-501
128. Leroy C., Lee S.E., Vaze M.B., Ochsenbien F., Guerois R., Haber J.E., and Marsolier-Kergoat M.C. PP2C phosphatases Ptc2 and Ptc3 are required for DNA checkpoint inactivation after a double-strand break. Mol. Cell 11 (2003) 827-835
129. Pellicioli A., Lee S.E., Lucca C., Foiani M., and Haber J.E. Regulation of Saccharomyces Rad53 checkpoint kinase during adaptation from DNA damage-induced G2/M arrest. Mol. Cell 7 (2001) 293-300
130. Usui T., Foster S.S., and Petrini J.H. Maintenance of the DNA-damage checkpoint requires DNA-damage-induced mediator protein oligomerization. Mol. Cell 33 (2009) 147-159
131. Usui T., Ogawa H., and Petrini J.H. A DNA damage response pathway controlled by Tel1 and the Mre11 complex. Mol. Cell 7 (2001) 1255-1266
132. Flott S., Alabert C., Toh G.W., Toth R., Sugawara N., Campbell D.G., Haber J.E., Pasero P., and Rouse J. Phosphorylation of Slx4 by Mec1 and Tel1 regulates the single-strand annealing mode of DNA repair in budding yeast. Mol. Cell Biol. 27 (2007) 6433-6445
133. Morin I., Ngo H.P., Greenall A., Zubko M.K., Morrice N., and Lydall D. Checkpoint-dependent phosphorylation of Exo1 modulates the DNA damage response. EMBO J. 27 (2008) 2400-2410
134. Liberi G., Chiolo I., Pellicioli A., Lopes M., Plevani P., Muzi-Falconi M., and Foiani M. Srs2 DNA helicase is involved in checkpoint response and its regulation requires a functional Mec1-dependent pathway and Cdk1 activity. EMBO J. 19 (2000) 5027-5038
135. Baroni E., Viscardi V., Cartagena-Lirola H., Lucchini G., and Longhese M.P. The functions of budding yeast Sae2 in the DNA damage response require Mec1- and Tel1-dependent phosphorylation. Mol. Cell Biol. 24 (2004) 4151-4165
136. Tseng S.F., Lin J.J., and Teng S.C. The telomerase-recruitment domain of the telomere binding protein Cdc13 is regulated by Mec1p/Tel1p-dependent phosphorylation. Nucleic Acids Res. 34 (2006) 6327-6336
137. Olson E., Nievera C.J., Klimovich V., Fanning E., and Wu X. RPA2 is a direct downstream target for ATR to regulate the S-phase checkpoint. J. Biol. Chem. 281 (2006) 39517-39533