Genome-Organizing Factors Top2 and Hmo1 Prevent Chromosome Fragility at Sites of S phase Transcription

Cell

Volumn 138, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 870-884

  Bermejo, Rodrigo ^a   Capra, Thelma ^a   Gonzalez Huici, Victor ^a   Fachinetti, Daniele ^a   Cocito, Andrea ^a   Natoli, Gioacchino ^c   Katou, Yuki ^d   Mori, Hiroshi ^d   Kurokawa, Ken ^d   Shirahige, Katsuhiko ^d   Foiani, Marco ^a,b  

^a FIRC INSTITUTE OF MOLECULAR ONCOLOGY   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

^c EUROPEAN INSTITUTE OF ONCOLOGY   (Italy)

^d TOKYO INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

Author keywords

CELLCYCLE; DNA; PROTEINS

Indexed keywords

DNA TOPOISOMERASE (ATP HYDROLYSING); HIGH MOBILITY GROUP PROTEIN; HISTONE; PROTEIN HMO1; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE G2 PHASE; CELL CYCLE M PHASE; CELL CYCLE S PHASE; CHROMOSOME FRAGILITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ENZYME BINDING; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION;

EID: 69449108384     PISSN: 00928674     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.06.022     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Agresti A., and Bianchi M.E. HMGB proteins and gene expression. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 13 (2003) 170-178
2. Aguilera A., and Gomez-Gonzalez B. Genome instability: a mechanistic view of its causes and consequences. Nat. Rev. Genet. 9 (2008) 204-217
3. Ansari A., and Hampsey M. A role for the CPF 3′-end processing machinery in RNAP II-dependent gene looping. Genes Dev. 19 (2005) 2969-2978
4. Bachant J., Alcasabas A., Blat Y., Kleckner N., and Elledge S.J. The SUMO-1 isopeptidase Smt4 is linked to centromeric cohesion through SUMO-1 modification of DNA topoisomerase II. Mol. Cell 9 (2002) 1169-1182
5. Baumann C., Korner R., Hofmann K., and Nigg E.A. PICH, a centromere-associated SNF2 family ATPase, is regulated by Plk1 and required for the spindle checkpoint. Cell 128 (2007) 101-114
6. Baxter J., and Diffley J.F. Topoisomerase II inactivation prevents the completion of DNA replication in budding yeast. Mol. Cell 30 (2008) 790-802
7. Berger A.B., Decourty L., Badis G., Nehrbass U., Jacquier A., and Gadal O. Hmo1 is required for TOR-dependent regulation of ribosomal protein gene transcription. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27 (2007) 8015-8026
8. Bermejo R., Doksani Y., Capra T., Katou Y.M., Tanaka H., Shirahige K., and Foiani M. Top1- and Top2-mediated topological transitions at replication forks ensure fork progression and stability and prevent DNA damage checkpoint activation. Genes Dev. 21 (2007) 1921-1936
9. Bermejo R., Branzei D., and Foiani M. Cohesion by topology: sister chromatids interlocked by DNA. Genes Dev. 22 (2008) 2297-2301
10. Bianchi M.E., Beltrame M., and Paonessa G. Specific recognition of cruciform DNA by nuclear protein HMG1. Science 243 (1989) 1056-1059
11. Blasquez V.C., Sperry A.O., Cockerill P.N., and Garrard W.T. Protein:DNA interactions at chromosomal loop attachment sites. Genome 31 (1989) 503-509
12. Branzei D., and Foiani M. Regulation of DNA repair throughout the cell cycle. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9 (2008) 297-308
13. Brewer B.J., and Fangman W.L. A replication fork barrier at the 3′ end of yeast ribosomal RNA genes. Cell 55 (1988) 637-643
14. Brill S.J., and Sternglanz R. Transcription-dependent DNA supercoiling in yeast DNA topoisomerase mutants. Cell 54 (1988) 403-411
15. Casper A.M., Nghiem P., Arlt M.F., and Glover T.W. ATR regulates fragile site stability. Cell 111 (2002) 779-789
16. Cha R.S., and Kleckner N. ATR homolog Mec1 promotes fork progression, thus averting breaks in replication slow zones. Science 297 (2002) 602-606
17. Champoux J.J. DNA topoisomerases: structure, function, and mechanism. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 70 (2001) 369-413
18. Chan K.L., North P.S., and Hickson I.D. BLM is required for faithful chromosome segregation and its localization defines a class of ultrafine anaphase bridges. EMBO J. 26 (2007) 3397-3409
19. Cockerill P.N., and Garrard W.T. Chromosomal loop anchorage of the kappa immunoglobulin gene occurs next to the enhancer in a region containing topoisomerase II sites. Cell 44 (1986) 273-282
20. Collins I., Weber A., and Levens D. Transcriptional consequences of topoisomerase inhibition. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21 (2001) 8437-8451
21. Courbet S., Gay S., Arnoult N., Wronka G., Anglana M., Brison O., and Debatisse M. Replication fork movement sets chromatin loop size and origin choice in mammalian cells. Nature 455 (2008) 557-560
22. Deshpande A.M., and Newlon C.S. DNA replication fork pause sites dependent on transcription. Science 272 (1996) 1030-1033
23. Di Micco R., Fumagalli M., Cicalese A., Piccinin S., Gasparini P., Luise C., Schurra C., Garre M., Nuciforo P.G., Bensimon A., et al. Oncogene-induced senescence is a DNA damage response triggered by DNA hyper-replication. Nature 444 (2006) 638-642
24. DiNardo S., Voelkel K., and Sternglanz R. DNA topoisomerase II mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: topoisomerase II is required for segregation of daughter molecules at the termination of DNA replication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81 (1984) 2616-2620
25. Earnshaw W.C., and Heck M.M. Localization of topoisomerase II in mitotic chromosomes. J. Cell Biol. 100 (1985) 1716-1725
26. Eivazova E.R., Gavrilov A., Pirozhkova I., Petrov A., Iarovaia O.V., Razin S.V., Lipinski M., and Vassetzky Y.S. Interaction in vivo between the two matrix attachment regions flanking a single chromatin loop. J. Mol. Biol. 386 (2009) 929-937
27. Gadal O., Labarre S., Boschiero C., and Thuriaux P. Hmo1, an HMG-box protein, belongs to the yeast ribosomal DNA transcription system. EMBO J. 21 (2002) 5498-5507
28. Gaillard C., and Strauss F. DNA loops and semicatenated DNA junctions. BMC Biochem. 1 (2000) 1
29. Gasser R., Koller T., and Sogo J.M. The stability of nucleosomes at the replication fork. J. Mol. Biol. 258 (1996) 224-239
30. Gasser S.M., Laroche T., Falquet J., Boy de la Tour E., and Laemmli U.K. Metaphase chromosome structure. Involvement of topoisomerase II. J. Mol. Biol. 188 (1986) 613-629
31. Guillemette B., Bataille A.R., Gevry N., Adam M., Blanchette M., Robert F., and Gaudreau L. Variant histone H2A.Z is globally localized to the promoters of inactive yeast genes and regulates nucleosome positioning. PLoS Biol. 3 (2005) e384 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030384
32. Hall D.B., Wade J.T., and Struhl K. An HMG protein, Hmo1, associates with promoters of many ribosomal protein genes and throughout the rRNA gene locus in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26 (2006) 3672-3679
33. Holm C., Stearns T., and Botstein D. DNA topoisomerase II must act at mitosis to prevent nondisjunction and chromosome breakage. Mol. Cell. Biol. 9 (1989) 159-168
34. Hughes E.N., Engelsberg B.N., and Billings P.C. Purification of nuclear proteins that bind to cisplatin-damaged DNA. Identity with high mobility group proteins 1 and 2. J. Biol. Chem. 267 (1992) 13520-13527
35. Ivessa A.S., Lenzmeier B.A., Bessler J.B., Goudsouzian L.K., Schnakenberg S.L., and Zakian V.A. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae helicase Rrm3p facilitates replication past nonhistone protein-DNA complexes. Mol. Cell 12 (2003) 1525-1536
36. Ju B.G., Lunyak V.V., Perissi V., Garcia-Bassets I., Rose D.W., Glass C.K., and Rosenfeld M.G. A topoisomerase IIbeta-mediated dsDNA break required for regulated transcription. Science 312 (2006) 1798-1802
37. Kamau E., Bauerle K.T., and Grove A. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae high mobility group box protein HMO1 contains two functional DNA binding domains. J. Biol. Chem. 279 (2004) 55234-55240
38. Kasahara K., Ohtsuki K., Ki S., Aoyama K., Takahashi H., Kobayashi T., Shirahige K., and Kokubo T. Assembly of regulatory factors on rRNA and ribosomal protein genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27 (2007) 6686-6705
39. Katou Y., Kanoh Y., Bando M., Noguchi H., Tanaka H., Ashikari T., Sugimoto K., and Shirahige K. S-phase checkpoint proteins Tof1 and Mrc1 form a stable replication-pausing complex. Nature 424 (2003) 1078-1083
40. Katou Y., Kaneshiro K., Aburatani H., and Shirahige K. Genomic approach for the understanding of dynamic aspect of chromosome behavior. Methods Enzymol. 409 (2006) 389-410
41. Lemaitre J.M., Danis E., Pasero P., Vassetzky Y., and Mechali M. Mitotic remodeling of the replicon and chromosome structure. Cell 123 (2005) 787-801
42. Lemoine F.J., Degtyareva N.P., Lobachev K., and Petes T.D. Chromosomal translocations in yeast induced by low levels of DNA polymerase a model for chromosome fragile sites. Cell 120 (2005) 587-598
43. Lengronne A., Pasero P., Bensimon A., and Schwob E. Monitoring S phase progression globally and locally using BrdU incorporation in TK(+) yeast strains. Nucleic Acids Res. 29 (2001) 1433-1442
44. Li T.K., Chen A.Y., Yu C., Mao Y., Wang H., and Liu L.F. Activation of topoisomerase II-mediated excision of chromosomal DNA loops during oxidative stress. Genes Dev. 13 (1999) 1553-1560
45. Liberi G., Maffioletti G., Lucca C., Chiolo I., Baryshnikova A., Cotta-Ramusino C., Lopes M., Pellicioli A., Haber J.E., and Foiani M. Rad51-dependent DNA structures accumulate at damaged replication forks in sgs1 mutants defective in the yeast ortholog of BLM RecQ helicase. Genes Dev. 19 (2005) 339-350
46. Lopes M., Cotta-Ramusino C., Liberi G., and Foiani M. Branch migrating sister chromatid junctions form at replication origins through Rad51/Rad52-independent mechanisms. Mol. Cell 12 (2003) 1499-1510
47. Lu J., Kobayashi R., and Brill S.J. Characterization of a high mobility group 1/2 homolog in yeast. J. Biol. Chem. 271 (1996) 33678-33685
48. Lucas I., Germe T., Chevrier-Miller M., and Hyrien O. Topoisomerase II can unlink replicating DNA by precatenane removal. EMBO J. 20 (2001) 6509-6519
49. Lydall D., and Whitehall S. Chromatin and the DNA damage response. DNA Repair (Amst.) 4 (2005) 1195-1207
50. Mankouri H.W., and Hickson I.D. Top3 processes recombination intermediates and modulates checkpoint activity after DNA damage. Mol. Biol. Cell 17 (2006) 4473-4483
51. Marti T.M., Hefner E., Feeney L., Natale V., and Cleaver J.E. H2AX phosphorylation within the G1 phase after UV irradiation depends on nucleotide excision repair and not DNA double-strand breaks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103 (2006) 9891-9896
52. Mavrich T.N., Ioshikhes I.P., Venters B.J., Jiang C., Tomsho L.P., Qi J., Schuster S.C., Albert I., and Pugh B.F. A barrier nucleosome model for statistical positioning of nucleosomes throughout the yeast genome. Genome Res. 18 (2008) 1073-1083
53. Merz K., Hondele M., Goetze H., Gmelch K., Stoeckl U., and Griesenbeck J. Actively transcribed rRNA genes in S. cerevisiae are organized in a specialized chromatin associated with the high-mobility group protein Hmo1 and are largely devoid of histone molecules. Genes Dev. 22 (2008) 1190-1204
54. Myung K., and Kolodner R.D. Suppression of genome instability by redundant S-phase checkpoint pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99 (2002) 4500-4507
55. O'Sullivan J.M., Tan-Wong S.M., Morillon A., Lee B., Coles J., Mellor J., and Proudfoot N.J. Gene loops juxtapose promoters and terminators in yeast. Nat. Genet. 36 (2004) 1014-1018
56. Pellicioli A., Lucca C., Liberi G., Marini F., Lopes M., Plevani P., Romano A., Di Fiore P.P., and Foiani M. Activation of Rad53 kinase in response to DNA damage and its effect in modulating phosphorylation of the lagging strand DNA polymerase. EMBO J. 18 (1999) 6561-6572
57. Pomerantz R.T., and O'Donnell M. The replisome uses mRNA as a primer after colliding with RNA polymerase. Nature 456 (2008) 762-766
58. Postow L., Crisona N.J., Peter B.J., Hardy C.D., and Cozzarelli N.R. Topological challenges to DNA replication: conformations at the fork. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98 (2001) 8219-8226
59. Prado F., and Aguilera A. Impairment of replication fork progression mediates RNA polII transcription-associated recombination. EMBO J. 24 (2005) 1267-1276
60. Redon C., Pilch D., Rogakou E., Sedelnikova O., Newrock K., and Bonner W. Histone H2A variants H2AX and H2AZ. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 12 (2002) 162-169
61. Rocha E.P. The replication-related organization of bacterial genomes. Microbiology 150 (2004) 1609-1627
62. Saitoh Y., and Laemmli U.K. Metaphase chromosome structure: bands arise from a differential folding path of the highly AT-rich scaffold. Cell 76 (1994) 609-622
63. Sanchez Y., Desany B.A., Jones W.J., Liu Q., Wang B., and Elledge S.J. Regulation of RAD53 by the ATM-like kinases MEC1 and TEL1 in yeast cell cycle checkpoint pathways. Science 271 (1996) 357-360
64. Schmidt K.H., and Kolodner R.D. Suppression of spontaneous genome rearrangements in yeast DNA helicase mutants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103 (2006) 18196-18201
65. Schneider R., and Grosschedl R. Dynamics and interplay of nuclear architecture, genome organization, and gene expression. Genes Dev. 21 (2007) 3027-3043
66. Scholes D.T., Banerjee M., Bowen B., and Curcio M.J. Multiple regulators of Ty1 transposition in Saccharomyces cerevisiae have conserved roles in genome maintenance. Genetics 159 (2001) 1449-1465
67. Sikdar N., Banerjee S., Zhang H., Smith S., and Myung K. Spt2p defines a new transcription-dependent gross chromosomal rearrangement pathway. PLoS Genet. 4 (2008) e1000290 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000290
68. Smith S., Gupta A., Kolodner R.D., and Myung K. Suppression of gross chromosomal rearrangements by the multiple functions of the Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 complex in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. DNA Repair (Amst.) 4 (2005) 606-617
69. Sogo J.M., Lopes M., and Foiani M. Fork reversal and ssDNA accumulation at stalled replication forks owing to checkpoint defects. Science 297 (2002) 599-602
70. Spell R.M., and Holm C. Nature and distribution of chromosomal intertwinings in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14 (1994) 1465-1476
71. Stros M., and Muselikova E. A role of basic residues and the putative intercalating phenylalanine of the HMG-1 box B in DNA supercoiling and binding to four-way DNA junctions. J. Biol. Chem. 275 (2000) 35699-35707
72. Stros M., Bacikova A., Polanska E., Stokrova J., and Strauss F. HMGB1 interacts with human topoisomerase IIalpha and stimulates its catalytic activity. Nucleic Acids Res. 35 (2007) 5001-5013
73. Stros M., Launholt D., and Grasser K.D. The HMG-box: a versatile protein domain occurring in a wide variety of DNA-binding proteins. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 64 (2007) 2590-2606
74. Thomas J.O. HMG1 and 2: architectural DNA-binding proteins. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 29 (2001) 395-401
75. Thomas J.O., and Travers A.A. HMG1 and 2, and related 'architectural' DNA-binding proteins. Trends Biochem. Sci. 26 (2001) 167-174
76. Torres J.Z., Bessler J.B., and Zakian V.A. Local chromatin structure at the ribosomal DNA causes replication fork pausing and genome instability in the absence of the S. cerevisiae DNA helicase Rrm3p. Genes Dev. 18 (2004) 498-503
77. Varga-Weisz P.D., Wilm M., Bonte E., Dumas K., Mann M., and Becker P.B. Chromatin-remodelling factor CHRAC contains the ATPases ISWI and topoisomerase II. Nature 388 (1997) 598-602
78. Vidanes G.M., Bonilla C.Y., and Toczyski D.P. Complicated tails: histone modifications and the DNA damage response. Cell 121 (2005) 973-976
79. Wang J.C. Cellular roles of DNA topoisomerases: a molecular perspective. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 3 (2002) 430-440
80. Wang X., Reyes-Lamothe R., and Sherratt D.J. Modulation of Escherichia coli sister chromosome cohesion by topoisomerase IV. Genes Dev. 22 (2008) 2426-2433
81. Warsi T.H., Navarro M.S., and Bachant J. DNA topoisomerase II is a determinant of the tensile properties of yeast centromeric chromatin and the tension checkpoint. Mol. Biol. Cell 19 (2008) 4421-4433
82. Yeh E., Haase J., Paliulis L.V., Joglekar A., Bond L., Bouck D., Salmon E.D., and Bloom K.S. Pericentric chromatin is organized into an intramolecular loop in mitosis. Curr. Biol. 18 (2008) 81-90
83. Zechiedrich E.L., and Osheroff N. Eukaryotic topoisomerases recognize nucleic acid topology by preferentially interacting with DNA crossovers. EMBO J. 9 (1990) 4555-4562
84. Zlatanova J., and Thakar A. H2A.Z: view from the top. Structure 16 (2008) 166-179
85. Zlatanova J.S., and van Holde K.E. Chromatin loops and transcriptional regulation. Crit. Rev. Eukaryot. Gene Expr. 2 (1992) 211-224