DNA damage checkpoint inactivation: Adaptation and recovery

DNA Repair

Volumn 8, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 1101-1109

  Clémenson, Céline ^a   Marsolier Kergoat, Marie Claude ^a  

^a SERVICE DE CHIMIE BIOORGANIQUE ET DE MARQUAGE   (France)

Author keywords

Adaptation; DNA damage checkpoint; Recovery; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Yeast

Indexed keywords

DNA;

ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE ARREST; DNA DAMAGE; DNA MODIFICATION; DNA REPAIR; DNA STRUCTURE; HUMAN; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN PROCESSING; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES POMBE;

ADAPTATION, BIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; CELL CYCLE; DNA DAMAGE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

ANIMALIA; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCETALES; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES POMBE;

EID: 68249119893     PISSN: 15687864     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2009.04.008     Document Type: Article

References (95)

1. Harrison J.C., and Haber J.E. Surviving the breakup: the DNA damage checkpoint. Annu. Rev. Genet. 40 (2006) 209-235
2. Li L., and Zou L. Sensing, signaling, and responding to DNA damage: organization of the checkpoint pathways in mammalian cells. J. Cell. Biochem. 94 (2005) 298-306
3. O'Connell M.J., and Cimprich K.A. G2 damage checkpoints: what is the turn-on?. J. Cell. Sci. 118 (2005) 1-6
4. Sancar A., Lindsey-Boltz L.A., Unsal-Kacmaz K., and Linn S. Molecular mechanisms of mammalian DNA repair and the DNA damage checkpoints. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 73 (2004) 39-85
5. Ward I., and Chen J. Early events in the DNA damage response. Curr. Top Dev. Biol. 63 (2004) 1-35
6. Paciotti V., Clerici M., Lucchini G., and Longhese M.P. The checkpoint protein Ddc2, functionally related to S. pombe Rad26, interacts with Mec1 and is regulated by Mec1-dependent phosphorylation in budding yeast. Genes. Dev. 14 (2000) 2046-2059
7. Rouse J., and Jackson S.P. LCD1: an essential gene involved in checkpoint control and regulation of the MEC1 signalling pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Embo. J. 19 (2000) 5801-5812
8. Wakayama T., Kondo T., Ando S., Matsumoto K., and Sugimoto K. Pie1, a protein interacting with Mec1, controls cell growth and checkpoint responses in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21 (2001) 755-764
9. Zou L., and Elledge S.J. Sensing DNA damage through ATRIP recognition of RPA-ssDNA complexes. Science 300 (2003) 1542-1548
10. White C.I., and Haber J.E. Intermediates of recombination during mating type switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Embo. J. 9 (1990) 663-673
11. Ira G., Pellicioli A., Balijja A., Wang X., Fiorani S., Carotenuto W., Liberi G., Bressan D., Wan L., Hollingsworth N.M., Haber J.E., and Foiani M. DNA end resection, homologous recombination and DNA damage checkpoint activation require CDK1. Nature 431 (2004) 1011-1017
12. Falck J., Coates J., and Jackson S.P. Conserved modes of recruitment of ATM, ATR and DNA-PKcs to sites of DNA damage. Nature 434 (2005) 605-611
13. Nakada D., Matsumoto K., and Sugimoto K. ATM-related Tel1 associates with double-strand breaks through an Xrs2-dependent mechanism. Genes. Dev. 17 (2003) 1957-1962
14. Lindahl T., and Barnes D.E. Repair of endogenous DNA damage. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 65 (2000) 127-133
15. Leroy C., Mann C., and Marsolier M.C. Silent repair accounts for cell cycle specificity in the signaling of oxidative DNA lesions. Embo. J. 20 (2001) 2896-2906
16. Painter R.B., and Young B.R. Radiosensitivity in ataxia-telangiectasia: a new explanation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 77 (1980) 7315-7317
17. Weinert T.A., and Hartwell L.H. The RAD9 gene controls the cell cycle response to DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 241 (1988) 317-322
18. Sidorova J.M., and Breeden L.L. Rad53-dependent phosphorylation of Swi6 and down-regulation of CLN1 and CLN2 transcription occur in response to DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes. Dev. 11 (1997) 3032-3045
19. Wysocki R., Javaheri A., Kristjansdottir K., Sha F., and Kron S.J. CDK Pho85 targets CDK inhibitor Sic1 to relieve yeast G1 checkpoint arrest after DNA damage. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 13 (2006) 908-914
20. Ciosk R., Zachariae W., Michaelis C., Shevchenko A., Mann M., and Nasmyth K. An ESP1/PDS1 complex regulates loss of sister chromatid cohesion at the metaphase to anaphase transition in yeast. Cell 93 (1998) 1067-1076
21. Agarwal R., Tang Z., Yu H., and Cohen-Fix O. Two distinct pathways for inhibiting pds1 ubiquitination in response to DNA damage. J. Biol. Chem. 278 (2003) 45027-45033
22. Sanchez Y., Bachant J., Wang H., Hu F., Liu D., Tetzlaff M., and Elledge S.J. Control of the DNA damage checkpoint by chk1 and rad53 protein kinases through distinct mechanisms. Science 286 (1999) 1166-1171
23. Raleigh J.M., and O'Connell M.J. The G(2) DNA damage checkpoint targets both Wee1 and Cdc25. J. Cell. Sci. 113 Pt 10 (2000) 1727-1736
24. Nyberg K.A., Michelson R.J., Putnam C.W., and Weinert T.A. Toward maintaining the genome: DNA damage and replication checkpoints. Annu. Rev. Genet. 36 (2002) 617-656
25. Rogakou E.P., Boon C., Redon C., and Bonner W.M. Megabase chromatin domains involved in DNA double-strand breaks in vivo. J. Cell. Biol. 146 (1999) 905-916
26. Shroff R., Arbel-Eden A., Pilch D., Ira G., Bonner W.M., Petrini J.H., Haber J.E., and Lichten M. Distribution and dynamics of chromatin modification induced by a defined DNA double-strand break. Curr. Biol. 14 (2004) 1703-1711
27. Downs J.A., Allard S., Jobin-Robitaille O., Javaheri A., Auger A., Bouchard N., Kron S.J., Jackson S.P., and Cote J. Binding of chromatin-modifying activities to phosphorylated histone H2A at DNA damage sites. Mol. Cell. 16 (2004) 979-990
28. Morrison A.J., Highland J., Krogan N.J., Arbel-Eden A., Greenblatt J.F., Haber J.E., and Shen X. INO80 and gamma-H2AX interaction links ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling to DNA damage repair. Cell 119 (2004) 767-775
29. van Attikum H., Fritsch O., Hohn B., and Gasser S.M. Recruitment of the INO80 complex by H2A phosphorylation links ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling with DNA double-strand break repair. Cell 119 (2004) 777-788
30. Downs J.A., Lowndes N.F., and Jackson S.P. A role for Saccharomyces cerevisiae histone H2A in DNA repair. Nature 408 (2000) 1001-1004
31. Redon C., Pilch D.R., Rogakou E.P., Orr A.H., Lowndes N.F., and Bonner W.M. Yeast histone 2A serine 129 is essential for the efficient repair of checkpoint-blind DNA damage. EMBO Rep. 4 (2003) 678-684
32. Masumoto H., Hawke D., Kobayashi R., and Verreault A. A role for cell-cycle-regulated histone H3 lysine 56 acetylation in the DNA damage response. Nature 436 (2005) 294-298
33. Celic I., Masumoto H., Griffith W.P., Meluh P., Cotter R.J., Boeke J.D., and Verreault A. The sirtuins hst3 and Hst4p preserve genome integrity by controlling histone h3 lysine 56 deacetylation. Curr. Biol. 16 (2006) 1280-1289
34. Gasch A.P., Huang M., Metzner S., Botstein D., Elledge S.J., and Brown P.O. Genomic expression responses to DNA-damaging agents and the regulatory role of the yeast ATR homolog Mec1p. Mol. Biol. Cell. 12 (2001) 2987-3003
35. Gasch A.P., Spellman P.T., Kao C.M., Carmel-Harel O., Eisen M.B., Storz G., Botstein D., and Brown P.O. Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. Mol. Biol. Cell. 11 (2000) 4241-4257
36. Chabes A., Georgieva B., Domkin V., Zhao X., Rothstein R., and Thelander L. Survival of DNA damage in yeast directly depends on increased dNTP levels allowed by relaxed feedback inhibition of ribonucleotide reductase. Cell 112 (2003) 391-401
37. Haghnazari E., and Heyer W.D. The DNA damage checkpoint pathways exert multiple controls on the efficiency and outcome of the repair of a double-stranded DNA gap. Nucleic Acids Res. 32 (2004) 4257-4268
38. Bashkirov V.I., King J.S., Bashkirova E.V., Schmuckli-Maurer J., and Heyer W.D. DNA repair protein Rad55 is a terminal substrate of the DNA damage checkpoints. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20 (2000) 4393-4404
39. Kuhne M., Riballo E., Rief N., Rothkamm K., Jeggo P.A., and Lobrich M. A double-strand break repair defect in ATM-deficient cells contributes to radiosensitivity. Cancer Res. 64 (2004) 500-508
40. Morrison C., Sonoda E., Takao N., Shinohara A., Yamamoto K., and Takeda S. The controlling role of ATM in homologous recombinational repair of DNA damage. Embo. J. 19 (2000) 463-471
41. Herzberg K., Bashkirov V.I., Rolfsmeier M., Haghnazari E., McDonald W.H., Anderson S., Bashkirova E.V., Yates III J.R., and Heyer W.D. Phosphorylation of Rad55 on serines 2, 8, and 14 is required for efficient homologous recombination in the recovery of stalled replication forks. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26 (2006) 8396-8409
42. Lopes M., Cotta-Ramusino C., Pellicioli A., Liberi G., Plevani P., Muzi-Falconi M., Newlon C.S., and Foiani M. The DNA replication checkpoint response stabilizes stalled replication forks. Nature 412 (2001) 557-561
43. Sogo J.M., Lopes M., and Foiani M. Fork reversal and ssDNA accumulation at stalled replication forks owing to checkpoint defects. Science 297 (2002) 599-602
44. Kai M., Boddy M.N., Russell P., and Wang T.S. Replication checkpoint kinase Cds1 regulates Mus81 to preserve genome integrity during replication stress. Genes Dev. 19 (2005) 919-932
45. Alvino G.M., Collingwood D., Murphy J.M., Delrow J., Brewer B.J., and Raghuraman M.K. Replication in hydroxyurea: it's a matter of time. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27 (2007) 6396-6406
46. Santocanale C., and Diffley J.F. A Mec1- and Rad53-dependent checkpoint controls late-firing origins of DNA replication. Nature 395 (1998) 615-618
47. Shirahige K., Hori Y., Shiraishi K., Yamashita M., Takahashi K., Obuse C., Tsurimoto T., and Yoshikawa H. Regulation of DNA-replication origins during cell-cycle progression. Nature 395 (1998) 618-621
48. Krishnan V., Nirantar S., Crasta K., Cheng A.Y., and Surana U. DNA replication checkpoint prevents precocious chromosome segregation by regulating spindle behavior. Mol. Cell. 16 (2004) 687-700
49. Branzei D., and Foiani M. The DNA damage response during DNA replication. Curr. Opin. Cell. Biol. 17 (2005) 568-575
50. Branzei D., and Foiani M. The Rad53 signal transduction pathway: Replication fork stabilization, DNA repair, and adaptation. Exp. Cell. Res. 312 (2006) 2654-2659
51. Syljuasen R.G. Checkpoint adaptation in human cells. Oncogene 26 (2007) 5833-5839
52. Sandell L.L., and Zakian V.A. Loss of a yeast telomere: arrest, recovery, and chromosome loss. Cell 75 (1993) 729-739
53. Toczyski D.P., Galgoczy D.J., and Hartwell L.H. CDC5 and CKII control adaptation to the yeast DNA damage checkpoint. Cell 90 (1997) 1097-1106
54. Lee S.E., Moore J.K., Holmes A., Umezu K., Kolodner R.D., and Haber J.E. Saccharomyces Ku70, mre11/rad50 and RPA proteins regulate adaptation to G2/M arrest after DNA damage. Cell 94 (1998) 399-409
55. Melo J.A., Cohen J., and Toczyski D.P. Two checkpoint complexes are independently recruited to sites of DNA damage in vivo. Genes Dev 15 (2001) 2809-2821
56. Yoo H.Y., Kumagai A., Shevchenko A., and Dunphy W.G. Adaptation of a DNA replication checkpoint response depends upon inactivation of Claspin by the Polo-like kinase. Cell 117 (2004) 575-588
57. Syljuasen R.G., Jensen S., Bartek J., and Lukas J. Adaptation to the ionizing radiation-induced G2 checkpoint occurs in human cells and depends on checkpoint kinase 1 and Polo-like kinase 1 kinases. Cancer Res. 66 (2006) 10253-10257
58. Keogh M.C., Kim J.A., Downey M., Fillingham J., Chowdhury D., Harrison J.C., Onishi M., Datta N., Galicia S., Emili A., Lieberman J., Shen X., Buratowski S., Haber J.E., Durocher D., Greenblatt J.F., and Krogan N.J. A phosphatase complex that dephosphorylates gammaH2AX regulates DNA damage checkpoint recovery. Nature 439 (2006) 497-501
59. Vaze M.B., Pellicioli A., Ira G., Lee S.E., Liberi G., Arbel-Eden A., Foiani M., and Haber J.E. Recovery from checkpoint-mediated arrest after repair of a double-strand break requires SRS2 helicase. Molecular Cell. 10 (2002) 373-385
60. Lee S.E., Pellicioli A., Demeter J., Vaze M.P., Gasch A.P., Malkova A., Brown P.O., Botstein D., Stearns T., Foiani M., and Haber Arrest J.E. Adaptation, and Recovery following a Chromosome Double-strand Break in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 65 (2000) 303-314
61. Clerici M., Mantiero D., Lucchini G., and Longhese M.P. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sae2 protein negatively regulates DNA damage checkpoint signalling. EMBO Rep. 7 (2006) 212-218
62. Chowdhury D., Keogh M.C., Ishii H., Peterson C.L., Buratowski S., and Lieberman J. gamma-H2AX dephosphorylation by protein phosphatase 2A facilitates DNA double-strand break repair. Mol. Cell. 20 (2005) 801-809
63. Papamichos-Chronakis M., Krebs J.E., and Peterson C.L. Interplay between Ino80 and Swr1 chromatin remodeling enzymes regulates cell cycle checkpoint adaptation in response to DNA damage. Genes Dev. 20 (2006) 2437-2449
64. Bakkenist C.J., and Kastan M.B. DNA damage activates ATM through intermolecular autophosphorylation and dimer dissociation. Nature 421 (2003) 499-506
65. Goodarzi A.A., Jonnalagadda J.C., Douglas P., Young D., Ye R., Moorhead G.B., Lees-Miller S.P., and Khanna K.K. Autophosphorylation of ataxia-telangiectasia mutated is regulated by protein phosphatase 2A. Embo. J. 23 (2004) 4451-4461
66. Den Elzen N.R., and O'Connell M.J. Recovery from DNA damage checkpoint arrest by PP1-mediated inhibition of Chk1. Embo. J. 23 (2004) 908-918
67. Lu X., Nannenga B., and Donehower L.A. PPM1D dephosphorylates Chk1 and p53 and abrogates cell cycle checkpoints. Genes. Dev. 19 (2005) 1162-1174
68. Leung-Pineda V., Ryan C.E., and Piwnica-Worms H. Phosphorylation of Chk1 by ATR is antagonized by a Chk1-regulated protein phosphatase 2A circuit. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26 (2006) 7529-7538
69. Bailis J.M., and Roeder G.S. Pachytene exit controlled by reversal of Mek1-dependent phosphorylation. Cell 101 (2000) 211-221
70. Hochwagen A., Tham W.H., Brar G.A., and Amon A. The FK506 binding protein Fpr3 counteracts protein phosphatase 1 to maintain meiotic recombination checkpoint activity. Cell 122 (2005) 861-873
71. Zhang Y.W., Otterness D.M., Chiang G.G., Xie W., Liu Y.C., Mercurio F., and Abraham R.T. Genotoxic stress targets human Chk1 for degradation by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Mol. Cell. 19 (2005) 607-618
72. Pellicioli A., Lucca C., Liberi G., Marini F., Lopes M., Plevani P., Romano A., Di Fiore P.P., and Foiani M. Activation of Rad53 kinase in response to DNA damage and its effect in modulating phosphorylation of the lagging strand DNA polymerase. Embo. J. 18 (1999) 6561-6572
73. Smolka M.B., Albuquerque C.P., Chen S.H., Schmidt K.H., Wei X.X., Kolodner R.D., and Zhou H. Dynamic changes in protein-protein interaction and protein phosphorylation probed with amine-reactive isotope tag. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 4 (2005) 1358-1369
74. Sweeney F.D., Yang F., Chi A., Shabanowitz J., Hunt D.F., and Durocher D. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad9 acts as a Mec1 adaptor to allow Rad53 activation. Curr. Biol. 15 (2005) 1364-1375
75. Leroy C., Lee S.E., Vaze M.B., Ochsenbien F., Guerois R., Haber J.E., and Marsolier-Kergoat M.C. PP2C phosphatases Ptc2 and Ptc3 are required for DNA checkpoint inactivation after a double-strand break. Mol. Cell. 11 (2003) 827-835
76. Guillemain G., Ma E., Mauger S., Miron S., Thai R., Guerois R., Ochsenbein F., and Marsolier-Kergoat M.C. Mechanisms of checkpoint kinase Rad53 inactivation after a double-strand break in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27 (2007) 3378-3389
77. O'Neill B.M., Szyjka S.J., Lis E.T., Bailey A.O., Yates J.R., 3rd O.M., Aparicio F.E., and Romesberg. Pph3-Psy2 is a phosphatase complex required for Rad53 dephosphorylation and replication fork restart during recovery from DNA damage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104 (2007) 9290-9295
78. Travesa A., Duch A., and Quintana D.G. Distinct phosphatases mediate the deactivation of the DNA damage checkpoint kinase Rad53. J. Biol. Chem. 283 (2008) 17123-17130
79. Matsuoka S., Rotman G., Ogawa A., Shiloh Y., Tamai K., and Elledge S.J. Ataxia telangiectasia-mutated phosphorylates Chk2 in vivo and in vitro. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97 (2000) 10389-10394
80. Melchionna R., Chen X.B., Blasina A., and McGowan C.H. Threonine 68 is required for radiation-induced phosphorylation and activation of Cds1. Nat. Cell. Biol. 2 (2000) 762-765
81. Schwarz J.K., Lovly C.M., and Piwnica-Worms H. Regulation of the Chk2 protein kinase by oligomerization-mediated cis- and trans-phosphorylation. Mol. Cancer Res. 1 (2003) 598-609
82. Xu X., Tsvetkov L.M., and Stern D.F. Chk2 activation and phosphorylation-dependent oligomerization. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22 (2002) 4419-4432
83. Dozier C., Bonyadi M., Baricault L., Tonasso L., and Darbon J.M. Regulation of Chk2 phosphorylation by interaction with protein phosphatase 2A via its B' regulatory subunit. Biol. Cell. 96 (2004) 509-517
84. Liang X., Reed E., and Yu J.J. Protein phosphatase 2A interacts with Chk2 and regulates phosphorylation at Thr-68 after cisplatin treatment of human ovarian cancer cells. Int. J. Mol. Med. 17 (2006) 703-708
85. Fujimoto H., Onishi N., Kato N., Takekawa M., Xu X.Z., Kosugi A., Kondo T., Imamura M., Oishi I., Yoda A., and Minami Y. Regulation of the antioncogenic Chk2 kinase by the oncogenic Wip1 phosphatase. Cell Death Differ. (2005)
86. Oliva-Trastoy M., Berthonaud V., Chevalier A., Ducrot C., Marsolier-Kergoat M.C., Mann C., and Leteurtre F. The Wip1 phosphatase (PPM1D) antagonizes activation of the Chk2 tumour suppressor kinase. Oncogene 26 (2007) 1449-1458
87. Takekawa M., Adachi M., Nakahata A., Nakayama I., Itoh F., Tsukuda H., Taya Y., and Imai K. p53-inducible wip1 phosphatase mediates a negative feedback regulation of p38 MAPK-p53 signaling in response to UV radiation. Embo. J. 19 (2000) 6517-6526
88. Lu X., Bocangel D., Nannenga B., Yamaguchi H., Appella E., and Donehower L.A. The p53-induced oncogenic phosphatase PPM1D interacts with uracil DNA glycosylase and suppresses base excision repair. Mol. Cell. 15 (2004) 621-634
89. Kass E.M., Ahn J., Tanaka T., Freed-Pastor W.A., Keezer S., and Prives C. Stability of checkpoint kinase 2 is regulated via phosphorylation at serine 456. J. Biol. Chem. 282 (2007) 30311-30321
90. Lovly C.M., Yan L., Ryan C.E., Takada S., and Piwnica-Worms H. Regulation of Chk2 ubiquitination and signaling through autophosphorylation of serine 379. Mol. Cell. Biol. 28 (2008) 5874-5885
91. Zhang D., Zaugg K., Mak T.W., and Elledge S.J. A role for the deubiquitinating enzyme USP28 in control of the DNA-damage response. Cell 126 (2006) 529-542
92. Mailand N., Bekker-Jensen S., Bartek J., and Lukas J. Destruction of Claspin by SCFbetaTrCP restrains Chk1 activation and facilitates recovery from genotoxic stress. Mol. Cell. 23 (2006) 307-318
93. Mamely I., van Vugt M.A., Smits V.A., Semple J.I., Lemmens B., Perrakis A., Medema R.H., and Freire R. Polo-like kinase-1 controls proteasome-dependent degradation of Claspin during checkpoint recovery. Curr. Biol. 16 (2006) 1950-1955
94. Peschiaroli A., Dorrello N.V., Guardavaccaro D., Venere M., Halazonetis T., Sherman N.E., and Pagano M. SCFbetaTrCP-mediated degradation of Claspin regulates recovery from the DNA replication checkpoint response. Mol. Cell. 23 (2006) 319-329
95. Galgoczy D.J., and Toczyski D.P. Checkpoint adaptation precedes spontaneous and damage-induced genomic instability in yeast. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21 (2001) 1710-1718