Sensory influences on food intake control: Moving beyond palatability

Obesity Reviews

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 18-29

  Mccrickerd, K ^a,b   Forde, C G ^a,b  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^b AGENCY FOR SCIENCE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Food intake; Palatability; Sensory cues; Texture

Indexed keywords

BEVERAGE; CALORIC INTAKE; EATING; FOOD INTAKE; MEMORY; NUTRITIONAL SCIENCE; ODOR; PALATABILITY; SATIETY; ASSOCIATION; CONDITIONING; FOOD; FOOD PREFERENCE; HUMAN; OBESITY; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGY; SATIETY RESPONSE; TASTE;

APPETITE REGULATION; CONDITIONING (PSYCHOLOGY); CUES; EATING; FOOD; FOOD PREFERENCES; HUMANS; OBESITY; SATIATION; SATIETY RESPONSE; SMELL; TASTE;

EID: 84958919343     PISSN: 14677881     EISSN: 1467789X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/obr.12340     Document Type: Article

References (149)

1. Sorensen LB, Moller P, Flint A, Martens M, Raben A. Effect of sensory perception of foods on appetite and food intake: a review of studies on humans. Int J Obes (London) 2003; 27: 1152-1166.
2. Yeomans MR. Taste, palatability and the control of appetite. Proc Nutr Soc 1998; 57: 609-615.
3. Mela DJ. Eating for pleasure or just wanting to eat? Reconsidering sensory hedonic responses as a driver of obesity. Appetite 2006; 47: 10-17.
4. Rolls BJ. Sensory-specific satiety. Nutr Rev 1986; 44: 93-101.
5. Cabanac M. Sensory pleasure. Q Rev Biol 1979; 54: 1-29.
6. Cecil JE, Francis J, Read NW. Relative contributions of intestinal, gastric, oro-sensory influences and information to changes in appetite induced by the same liquid meal. Appetite 1998; 31: 377-390.
7. de Graaf C, de Jong LS, Lambers AC. Palatability affects satiation but not satiety. Physiol Behav 1999; 66: 681-688.
8. Chambers L, McCrickerd K, Yeomans MR. Optimising foods for satiety. Trends Food Sci Technol 2015; 41: 149-160.
9. Blundell JE, Rogers PJ, Hill AJ (eds). Evaluating the satiating power of foods. Implications for acceptance and consumption. In Colms J, Booth DA, Pangborn RM, Raunhardt O (eds). Food Acceptance and Nutrition. Academic Press: London, 1987, pp. 205-219. 1987.
10. Berthoud HR. Interactions between the "cognitive" and "metabolic" brain in the control of food intake. Physiol Behav 2007; 91: 486-498.
11. Toepel U, Bielser M-L, Forde C et al. Brain dynamics of meal size selection in humans. Neuroimage 2015; 113: 133-142.
12. Sclafani A. Learned controls of ingestive behaviour. Appetite 1997; 29: 153-158.
13. Brunstrom JM. Associative learning and the control of human dietary behavior. Appetite 2007; 49: 268-271.
14. Wooley SC, Wooley OW. Salivation to sight and thought of food - new measure of appetite. Psychosom Med 1973; 35: 136-142.
15. Feldman M, Richardson CT. Role of thought, sight, smell, and taste of food in the cephalic phase of gastric-acid secretion in humans. Gastroenterology 1986; 90: 428-433.
16. Smeets PAM, Erkner A, De Graaf C. Cephalic phase responses and appetite. Nutr Rev 2010; 68: 643-655.
17. Wansink B. Environmental factors that increase the food intake and consumption volume of unknowing consumers. Annu Rev Nutr 2004; 24: 455-479.
18. Marchiori D, Waroquier L, Klein O. smaller food item sizes of snack foods influence reduced portions and caloric intake in young adults. J Am Diet Assoc 2011; 111: 727-731.
19. Marchiori D, Waroquier L, Klein O. Split them smaller item sizes of cookies lead to a decrease in energy intake in children. J Nutr Educ Behav 2012; 44: 251-255.
20. Weijzen PL, Liem DG, Zandstra EH, de Graaf C. Sensory specific satiety and intake: the difference between nibble- and bar-size snacks. Appetite 2008; 50: 435-442.
21. Wadhera D, Capaldi-Phillips ED. A review of visual cues associated with food on food acceptance and consumption. Eat Behav 2014; 15: 132-143.
22. Geier A, Wansink B, Rozin P. Red potato chips: segmentation cues can substantially decrease food intake. Health Psychol 2012; 31: 398-401.
23. Robinson E, Nolan S, Tudur-Smith C et al. Will smaller plates lead to smaller waists? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect that experimental manipulation of dishware size has on energy consumption. Obes Rev 2014; 15: 812-821.
24. Wansink B, Painter JE, North J. Bottomless bowls: why visual cues of portion size may influence intake. Obes Res 2005; 13: 93-100.
25. Rolls BJ, Morris EL, Roe LS. Portion size of food affects energy intake in normal-weight and overweight men and women. Am J Clin Nutr 2002; 76: 1207-1213.
26. Rolls BJ, Roe LS, Meengs JS. Portion size can be used strategically to increase vegetable consumption in adults. Am J Clin Nutr 2010; 91: 913-922.
27. Wansink B, Kim J. Bad popcorn in big buckets: portion size can influence intake as much as taste. J Nutr Educ Behav 2005; 37: 242-245.
28. Burger KS, Fisher JO, Johnson SL. Mechanisms behind the portion size effect: visibility and bite size. Obesity 2011; 19: 546-551.
29. Marchiori D, Papies EK, Klein O. The portion size effect on food intake. An anchoring and adjustment process? Appetite 2014; 81: 108-115.
30. English L, Lasschuijt M, Keller KL. Mechanisms of the portion size effect. What is known and where do we go from here? Appetite 2015; 88: 39-49.
31. Fisher JO. Effects of age on children's intake of large and self-selected food portions. Obesity 2007; 15: 403-412.
32. Fisher JO, Rolls BJ, Birch LL. Children's bite size and intake of an entrée are greater with large portions than with age-appropriate or self-selected portions. Am J Clin Nutr 2003; 77: 1164-1170.
33. Rolls BJ, Roe LS, Halverson KH, Meengs JS. Using a smaller plate did not reduce energy intake at meals. Appetite 2007; 49: 652-660.
34. Green SM, Blundell JE. Subjective and objective indices of the satiating effect of foods. Can people predict how filling a food will be? Eur J Clin Nutr 1996; 50: 798-806.
35. de Graaf C, Stafleu A, Staal P, Wijne M. Beliefs about the satiating effect of bread with spread varying in macronutrient content. Appetite 1992; 18: 121-128.
36. Brunstrom JM, Shakeshaft NG, Scott-Samuel NE. Measuring 'expected satiety' in a range of common foods using a method of constant stimuli. Appetite 2008; 51: 604-614.
37. Brunstrom JM, Collingwood J, Rogers PJ. Perceived volume, expected satiation, and the energy content of self-selected meals. Appetite 2010; 55: 25-29.
38. Keenan GS, Brunstrom JM, Ferriday D. Effects of meal variety on expected satiation: evidence for a 'perceived volume' heuristic. Appetite 2015; 89: 10-15.
39. Hardman CA, McCrickerd K, Brunstrom JM. Children's familiarity with snack foods changes expectations about fullness. Am J Clin Nutr 2011; 94: 1196-1201.
40. Irvine MA, Brunstrom JM, Gee P, Rogers PJ. Increased familiarity with eating a food to fullness underlies increased expected satiety. Appetite 2013; 61: 13-18.
41. Wilkinson LL, Hinton EC, Fay SH, Ferriday D, Rogers PJ, Brunstrom JM. Computer-based assessments of expected satiety predict behavioural measures of portion-size selection and food intake. Appetite 2012; 59: 933-938.
42. Brunstrom JM, Rogers PJ. How many calories are on our plate? Expected fullness, not liking, determines meal-size selection. Obesity 2009; 17: 1884-1890.
43. Brunstrom JM, Burn JF, Sell NR et al. Episodic memory and appetite regulation in humans. Plos One 2012; 7: e50707.
44. Cassady BA, Considine RV, Mattes RD. Beverage consumption, appetite, and energy intake: what did you expect? Am J Clin Nutr 2012; 95: 587-593.
45. Small DM, Prescott J. Odor/taste integration and the perception of flavor. Exp Brain Res 2005; 166: 345-357.
46. Stevenson RJ. an initial evaluation of the functions of human olfaction. Chem Senses 2010; 35: 3-20.
47. Chebat J-C, Michon R. Impact of ambient odors on mall shoppers' emotions, cognition, and spending: a test of competitive causal theories. J Bus Res 2003; 56: 529-539.
48. Engelen L, de Wijk RA, Prinz JF, van der Bilt A, Bosman F. The relation between saliva flow after different stimulations and the perception of flavor and texture attributes in custard desserts. Physiol Behav 2003; 78: 165-169.
49. Ferriday D, Brunstrom JM. 'I just can't help myself': effects of food-cue exposure in overweight and lean individuals. Int J Obesity 2011; 35: 142-149.
50. Pangborn RM, Berggren B. Human parotid secretion in response to pleasant and unpleasant odorants. Psychophysiology 1973; 10: 231-237.
51. Ferriday D, Brunstrom JM. How does food-cue exposure lead to larger meal sizes? Br J Nutr 2008; 100: 1325-1332.
52. Tetley A, Brunstrom J, Griffiths P. Individual differences in food-cue reactivity. The role of BMI and everyday portion-size selections. Appetite 2009; 52: 614-620.
53. Coelho JS, Polivy J, Peter Herman C, Pliner P. Wake up and smell the cookies. Effects of olfactory food-cue exposure in restrained and unrestrained eaters. Appetite 2009; 52: 517-520.
54. Fedoroff IDC, Polivy J, Herman CP. The specificity of restrained versus unrestrained eaters' responses to food cues: general desire to eat, or craving for the cued food? Appetite 2003; 41: 7-13.
55. Fedoroff IDC, Polivy J, Herman CP. the effect of pre-exposure to food cues on the eating behavior of restrained and unrestrained eaters. Appetite 1997; 28: 33-47.
56. Larsen JK, Hermans RCJ, Engels RCME. Food intake in response to food-cue exposure. Examining the influence of duration of the cue exposure and trait impulsivity. Appetite 2012; 58: 907-913.
57. de Wijk RA, Zijlstra S. Differential effects of exposure to ambient vanilla and citrus aromas on mood, arousal and food choice. Flavour 2012; 1: 24.
58. Ramaekers MG, Boesveldt S, Lakemond CMM, Van Boekel MAJS, Luning PA. Odors: appetizing or satiating development of appetite during odor exposure over time. Int J Obesity 2014; 38: 650-656.
59. Gaillet M, Sulmont-Rossé C, Issanchou S, Chabanet C, Chambaron S. Priming effects of an olfactory food cue on subsequent food-related behaviour. Food Qual Prefer 2013; 30: 274-281.
60. Gaillet-Torrent M, Sulmont-Rossé C, Issanchou S, Chabanet C, Chambaron S. Impact of a non-attentively perceived odour on subsequent food choices. Appetite 2014; 76: 17-22.
61. Griffioen-Roose S, Smeets PA, van den Heuvel E, Boesveldt S, Finlayson G, de Graaf C. Human protein status modulates brain reward responses to food cues. Am J Clin Nutr 2014; 100: 113-122.
62. Zoon HFA, He W, de Wijk RA, de Graaf C, Boesveldt S. Food preference and intake in response to ambient odours in overweight and normal-weight females. Physiol Behav 2014; 133: 190-196.
63. Murphy C, Cain WS, Bartoshuk LM. Mutual action of taste and olfaction. Sens Processes 1977; 1: 204-211.
64. Ruijschop RMAJ, Burgering MJ, Jacobs MA, Boelrijk AE. Retro-nasal aroma release depends on both subject and product differences: a link to food intake regulation? Chem Senses 2009; 34: 395-403.
65. Ruijschop RMAJ, Zijlstra N, Boelrijk AE et al. Effects of bite size and duration of oral processing on retro-nasal aroma release - features contributing to meal termination. Br J Nutr 2011; 105: 307-315.
66. Seuvre AM, Diaz M, Cayot P, Voilley A. Influence of the composition and the structure of different media on the release of aroma compounds. Lait 2004; 84: 305-316.
67. Tarrega A, Yven C, Sémon E, Salles C. Aroma release and chewing activity during eating different model cheeses. Int Dairy J 2008; 18: 849-857.
68. Zijlstra N, Bukman AJ, Mars M, Stafleu A, Ruijschop RM, de Graaf C. Eating behaviour and retro-nasal aroma release in normal-weight and overweight adults: a pilot study. Br J Nutr 2011; 106: 297-306.
69. de Wijk RA, Polet IA, Boek W, Coenraad S, Bult JHF. Food aroma affects bite size. Flavour 2012; 3, 1-6.
70. Ruijschop RMAJ, Boelrijk AE, de Ru JA, de Graaf C, Westerterp-Plantenga MS. Effects of retro-nasal aroma release on satiation. Br J Nutr 2008; 99: 1140-1148.
71. Ruijschop RMAJ, Boelrijk AE, Burgering MJ, de Graaf C, Westerterp-Plantenga MS. Acute effects of complexity in aroma composition on satiation and food intake. Chem Senses 2010; 35: 91-100.
72. Ramaekers MG, Luning PA, Ruijschop RMAJ et al. Aroma exposure time and aroma concentration in relation to satiation. Br J Nutr 2014; 111: 554-562.
73. Booth DA. Satiety and appetite are conditioned reactions. Psychosom Med 1977; 39: 76-81.
74. Kalat JW, Rozin P. "Learned Safety" as a mechanism in long-delay taste-aversion learning in rats. J Comp Physiol Psychol 1973; 83: 198-207.
75. Viskaal-van Dongen M, van den Berg MC, Vink N, Kok FJ, de Graaf C. Taste-nutrient relationships in commonly consumed foods. Br J Nutr 2012; 108: 140-147.
76. Birch LL. Development of food preferences. Annu Rev Nutr 1999; 19: 41-62.
77. Liem DG, Mennella JA. Heightened sour preferences during childhood. Chem Senses 2003; 28: 173-180.
78. Mattes RD. Gustation as a determinant of ingestion: methodological issues. Am J Clin Nutr 1985; 41: 672-683.
79. Yeomans MR. Palatability and the micro-structure of feeding in humans: the appetizer effect. Appetite 1996; 27: 119-133.
80. Griffioen-Roose S, Mars M, Finlayson G, Blundell JE, de Graaf C. Satiation due to equally palatable sweet and savory meals does not differ in normal weight young adults. J Nutr 2009; 139: 2093-2098.
81. Bertino M, Beauchamp GK, Engelman K. Long-term reduction in dietary sodium alters the taste of salt. Am J Clin Nutr 1982; 36: 1134-1144.
82. Bertino M, Beauchamp GK, Engelman K. Increasing dietary salt alters salt taste preference. Physiol Behav 1986; 38: 203-213.
83. Monneuse MO, Bellisle F, Louis-Sylvestre J. Responses to an intense sweetener in humans: immediate preference and delayed effects on intake. Physiol Behav 1991; 49: 325-330.
84. Tordoff MG, Alleva AM. Oral stimulation with aspartame increases hunger. Physiol Behav 1990; 47: 555-559.
85. Lucas F, Bellisle F. The measurement of food preferences in humans: do taste-and-spit tests predict consumption? Physiol Behav 1987; 39: 739-743.
86. Vickers Z, Holton E. A comparison of the taste test ratings, repeated consumption, and postconsumption ratings of different strenght iced tea. J Sens Stud 1998; 13: 199-212.
87. Vickers Z, Holton E, Wang J. Effect of ideal-relative sweetness on yogurt consumption. Food Qual Prefer 2001; 12: 521-526.
88. Pérez C, Dalix A-M, Guy-Grand B, Bellisle F. Human responses to five concentrations of sucrose in a dairy product: immediate and delayed palatability effects. Appetite 1994; 23: 165-178.
89. Vickers Z, Holton E, Wang J. Effect of yogurt sweetness on sensory specific satiety. J Sens Stud 1998; 13: 377-388.
90. Bolhuis DP, Lakemond CMM, de Wijk RA, Luning PA, de Graaf C. Both longer oral sensory exposure to and higher intensity of saltiness decrease ad libitum food intake in healthy normal-weight men. J Nutr 2011; 141: 2242-2248.
91. Bolhuis DP, Lakemond CMM, de Wijk RA, Luning PA, de Graaf C. Effect of salt intensity in soup on ad libitum intake and on subsequent food choice. Appetite 2012; 58: 48-55.
92. Bolhuis DP, Lakemond CMM, de Wijk RA, Luning PA, de Graaf C. Effect of salt intensity on ad libitum intake of tomato soup similar in palatability and on salt preference after consumption. Chem Senses 2010; 35: 789-799.
93. Beauchamp GK, Pearson P. Human development and umami taste. Physiol Behav 1991; 49: 1009-1012.
94. Naim M, Ohara I, Kare MR, Levinson M. Interaction of MSG taste with nutrition: perspectives in consummatory behavior and digestion. Physiol Behav 1991; 49: 1019-1024.
95. Luscombe-Marsh ND, Smeets AJPG, Westerterp-Plantenga MS. Taste sensitivity for monosodium glutamate and an increased liking of dietary protein. Br J Nutr 2008; 99: 904-908.
96. Griffioen-Roose S, Mars M, Siebelink E, Finlayson G, Tomé D, de Graaf C. Protein status elicits compensatory changes in food intake and food preferences. Am J Clin Nutr 2012; 95: 32-38.
97. Bellisle F. Glutamate and the UMAMI taste: sensory, metabolic, nutritional and behavioural considerations. A review of the literature published in the last 10years. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 1999; 23: 423-438.
98. Rogers PJ, Blundell JE. Umami and appetite: effects of monosodium glutamate on hunger and food intake in human subjects. Physiol Behav 1990; 48: 801-804.
99. Masic U, Yeomans MR. Does monosodium glutamate interact with macronutrient composition to influence subsequent appetite? Physiol Behav 2013; 116-117: 23-29.
100. Masic U, Yeomans MR. Monosodium glutamate delivered in a protein-rich soup improves subsequent energy compensation. J Nutr Sci 2014; 3: 15, 1-9.
101. Masic U, Yeomans MR. Umami flavor enhances appetite but also increases satiety. Am J Clin Nutr 2014; 100: 532-538.
102. Carter BE, Monsivais P, Perrigue MM, Drewnowski A. Supplementing chicken broth with monosodium glutamate reduces hunger and desire to snack but does not affect energy intake in women. Br J Nutr 2011; 106: 1441-1448.
103. Griffioen-Roose S, Mars M, Finlayson G, Blundell JE, de Graaf C. The effect of within-meal protein content and taste on subsequent food choice and satiety. Br J Nutr 2011; 106: 779-788.
104. Luscombe-Marsh ND, Smeets AJ, Westerterp-Plantenga MS. The addition of monosodium glutamate and inosine monophosphate-5 to high-protein meals: effects on satiety, and energy and macronutrient intakes. Br J Nutr 2009; 102: 929-937.
105. Bellisle F, Drewnowski A. Intense sweeteners, energy intake and the control of body weight. Eur J Clin Nutr 2007; 61: 691-700.
106. Mattes RD, Popkin BM. Nonnutritive sweetener consumption in humans: effects on appetite and food intake and their putative mechanisms. Am J Clin Nutr 2009; 89: 1-14.
107. Miller PE, Perez V. Low-calorie sweeteners and body weight and composition: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies. Am J Clin Nutr 2014; 100: 765-777.
108. Rogers PJ, Hogenkamp PS, De Graaf C et al. Does low-energy sweetener consumption affect energy intake and body weight? A systematic review, including meta-analyses, of the evidence from human and animal studies. Int J Obesity 2015; DOI: 10.1038/ijo.2015.177.
109. Davidson TL, Martin AA, Clark K, Swithers SE. Intake of high-intensity sweeteners alters the ability of sweet taste to signal caloric consequences: implications for the learned control of energy and body weight regulation. Q J Exp Psychol 2011; 64: 1430-1441.
110. Davidson TL, Swithers SE. A Pavlovian approach to the problem of obesity. Int J Obesity 2004; 28: 933-935.
111. Keast R, Costanzo A. Is fat the sixth taste primary? Evidence and implications. Flavour 2015; 4: 1-7.
112. Szczesniak AS. Texture is a sensory property. Food Qual Prefer 2002; 13: 215-225.
113. Guinard J-X, Mazzucchelli R. The sensory perception of texture and mouthfeel. Trends Food Sci Technol 1996; 7: 213-219.
114. Kilcast D, Lewis DF. Structure and texture - their importance in food quality. Nutrition Bulletin 1990; 15: 103-113.
115. Forde CG, van Kuijk N, Thaler T, de Graaf C, Martin N. Oral processing characteristics of solid savoury meal components, and relationship with food composition, sensory attributes and expected satiation. Appetite 2013; 60: 208-219.
116. Haber GB, Heaton KW, Murphy D, Burroughs LF. Depletion and disruption of dietary fibre: effects on satiety, plasma-glucose, and serum-insulin. The Lancet 1977; 310: 679-682.
117. Viskaal-van Dongen M, Kok FJ, de Graaf C. Eating rate of commonly consumed foods promotes food and energy intake. Appetite 2011; 56: 25-31.
118. Bolhuis DP, Forde CG, Cheng Y, Xu H, Martin N, de Graaf C. Slow food: sustained impact of harder foods on the reduction in energy intake over the course of the day. Plos One 2014; 9: e93370.
119. Forde CG, van Kuijk N, Thaler T, de Graaf C, Martin N. Texture and savoury taste influences on food intake in a realistic hot lunch time meal. Appetite 2013; 60: 180-186.
120. Karl JP, Young AJ, Rood JC, Montain SJ. Independent and combined effects of eating rate and energy density on energy intake, appetite, and gut hormones. Obesity 2013; 21: E244-E252.
121. Zhu Y, Hsu WH, Hollis JH. The impact of food viscosity on eating rate, subjective appetite, glycemic response and gastric emptying rate. Plos One 2013; 8: e67482.
122. Zijlstra N, de Wijk RA, Mars M, Stafleu A, de Graaf C. Effect of bite size and oral processing time of a semisolid food on satiation. Am J Clin Nutr 2009; 90: 269-275.
123. Zijlstra N, Mars M, de Wijk RA, Westerterp-Plantenga MS, de Graaf C. The effect of viscosity on ad libitum food intake. Int J Obesity 2008; 32: 676-683.
124. Zijlstra N, Mars M, de Wijk RA, Westerterp-Plantenga MS, Holst JJ, de Graaf C. Effect of viscosity on appetite and gastro-intestinal hormones. Physiol Behav 2009; 97: 68-75.
125. Hogenkamp PS, Stafleu A, Mars M, Brunstrom JM, de Graaf C. Texture, not flavor, determines expected satiation of dairy products. Appetite 2011; 57: 635-641.
126. McCrickerd K, Chambers L, Brunstrom JM, Yeomans MR. Subtle changes in the flavour and texture of a drink enhance expectations of satiety. Flavour 2012; 1: 20: 1-11.
127. McCrickerd K, Chambers L, Yeomans MR. Does modifying the thick texture and creamy flavour of a drink change portion size selection and intake? Appetite 2014; 73: 114-120.
128. Mars M, Hogenkamp PS, Gosses AM, Stafleu A, De Graaf C. Effect of viscosity on learned satiation. Physiol Behav 2009; 98: 60-66.
129. Hogenkamp PS, Mars M, Stafleu A, de Graaf C. Repeated consumption of a large volume of liquid and semi-solid foods increases ad libitum intake, but does not change expected satiety. Appetite 2012; 59: 419-424.
130. Yeomans MR, McCrickerd K, Brunstrom JM, Chambers L. Effects of repeated consumption on sensory-enhanced satiety. Br J Nutr 2014; 111: 1137-1144.
131. Almiron-Roig E, Palla L, Guest K et al. Factors that determine energy compensation: a systematic review of preload studies. Nutr Rev 2013; 71: 458-473.
132. Flood-Obbagy JE, Rolls BJ. The effect of fruit in different forms on energy intake and satiety at a meal. Appetite 2009; 52: 416-422.
133. Hulshof T, de Graaf C, Weststrate JA. The effects of preloads varying in physical state and fat-content on satiety and energy-intake. Appetite 1993; 21: 273-286.
134. Mattes RD, Campbell WW. Effects of food form and timing of ingestion on appetite and energy intake in lean young adults and in young adults with obesity. J Am Diet Assoc 2009; 109: 430-437.
135. Mourao DM, Bressan J, Campbell WW, Mattes RD. Effects of food form on appetite and energy intake in lean and obese young adults. Int J Obesity 2007; 31: 1688-1695.
136. Tournier A, Louis-Sylvestre J. Effect of the physical state of a food on subsequent intake in human subjects. Appetite 1991; 16: 17-24.
137. Marciani L, Gowland PA, Spiller RC et al. Gastric response to increased meal viscosity assessed by echo-planar magnetic resonance imaging in humans. J Nutr 2000; 130: 122-127.
138. Martens MJI, Westerterp-Plantenga MS. Mode of consumption plays a role in alleviating hunger and thirst. Obesity 2012; 20: 517-524.
139. Teff KL. Cephalic phase pancreatic polypeptide responses to liquid and solid stimuli in humans. Physiol Behav 2010; 99: 317-323.
140. Teff KL, Devine J, Engelman K. Sweet taste - effect on cephalic phase insulin release in men. Physiol Behav 1995; 57: 1089-1095.
141. Andrade AM, Kresge DL, Teixeira PJ, Baptista F, Melanson KJ. Does eating slowly influence appetite and energy intake when water intake is controlled? Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2012; 9: 1479-5868.
142. Kokkinos A, le Roux CW, Alexiadou K et al. eating slowly increases the postprandial response of the anorexigenic gut hormones, peptide YY and glucagon-like peptide-1. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010; 95: 333-337.
143. Li J, Zhang N, Hu L et al. Improvement in chewing activity reduces energy intake in one meal and modulates plasma gut hormone concentrations in obese and lean young Chinese men. Am J Clin Nutr 2011; 94: 709-716.
144. Wijlens AGM, Erkner A, Alexander E, Mars M, Smeets PAM, de Graaf C. Effects of oral and gastric stimulation on appetite and energy intake. Obesity 2012; 20: 2226-2232.
145. McCrickerd K, Chambers L, Yeomans MR. Fluid or fuel? The context of consuming a beverage is important for satiety. Plos One 2014; 9: e100406.
146. Mattes RD, Rothacker D. Beverage viscosity is inversely related to postprandial hunger in humans. Physiol Behav 2001; 74: 551-557.
147. Yeomans MR, Chambers L. Satiety-relevant sensory qualities enhance the satiating effects of mixed carbohydrate-protein preloads. Am J Clin Nutr 2011; 94: 1410-1417.
148. Hogenkamp PS. The effect of sensory-nutrient congruency on food intake after repeated exposure: do texture and/or energy density matter? Physiol Behav 2014.
149. Hovard P, Chambers L, Hull S, Re R, Wickham MSJ, Yeomans MR. Sensory-enhanced beverages: effects on satiety following repeated consumption at home. Nutrition Bulletin 2015; 40: 187-198.