Does modifying the thick texture and creamy flavour of a drink change portion size selection and intake?

Appetite

Volumn 73, Issue , 2014, Pages 114-120

  McCrickerd, Keri ^a   Chambers, Lucy ^a   Yeomans, Martin R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Beverage; Creaminess; Expectations; Satiation; Sensory characteristics; Viscosity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EXPECTATION; FEMALE; FLAVOR; FLUID INTAKE; FOOD INTAKE; FOOD TEXTURE; HUMAN; HUNGER; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PORTION SIZE; PREDICTION; SATIETY; SEX DIFFERENCE; TEST MEAL; VISCOSITY;

BEVERAGE; CREAMINESS; EXPECTATIONS; MILLIMETRES PER SECOND; MILLIPASCAL-SECOND; MINI-TRACTION-MACHINE TRIBOMETER; MMS(-1); MPAS; MTM2; RECIPROCAL SECONDS; S(-1); SATIATION; SENSORY CHARACTERISTICS; VISCOSITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; APPETITE; APPETITE REGULATION; BEVERAGES; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; DAIRY PRODUCTS; ENERGY INTAKE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEALS; MIDDLE AGED; PORTION SIZE; SATIETY RESPONSE; SEX FACTORS; TASTE; VISCOSITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84888782838     PISSN: 01956663     EISSN: 10958304     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2013.10.020     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Bertenshaw E.J., Lluch A., Yeomans M.R. Perceived thickness and creaminess modulates the short-term satiating effects of high-protein drinks. British Journal of Nutrition 2013, 110:578-586.
2. Blundell J.E., de Graaf C., Hulshof T., Jebb S., Livingstone B.M., Lluch A., et al. Appetite control. Methodological aspects of the evaluation of foods. [Article]. Obesity Reviews 2010, 11(3):251-270.
3. Blundell J.E., Rogers P.J., Hill A.J. Evaluating the satiating power of foods. Implications for Acceptance and Consumption 1987.
4. Brunstrom J.M. Associative learning and the control of human dietary behavior. [Article]. Appetite 2007, 49(1):268-271.
5. Brunstrom J.M. The control of meal size in human subjects: a role for expected satiety, expected satiation and premeal planning. [Article; Proceedings Paper]. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 2011, 70(2):155-161.
6. Cecil J.E., Francis J., Read N.W. Relative contributions of intestinal, gastric, oro-sensory influences and information to changes in appetite induced by the same liquid meal. [Article]. Appetite 1998, 31(3):377-390.
7. Cecil J.E., Francis J., Read N.W. Comparison of the effects of a high-fat and high-carbohydrate soup delivered orally and intragastrically on gastric emptying, appetite, and eating behaviour. [Article]. Physiology & Behavior 1999, 67(2):299-306.
8. de Wijk R.A., Terpstra M.E.J., Janssen A.M., Prinz J.F. Perceived creaminess of semi-solid foods. Trends in Food Science & Technology 2006, 17(8):412-422. 10.1016/j.tifs.2006.02.005.
9. Fay S.H., Ferriday D., Hinton E.C., Shakeshaft N.G., Rogers P.J., Brunstrom J.M. What determines real-world meal size? Evidence for pre-meal planning. [Article]. Appetite 2011, 56(2):284-289.
10. Herman C.P., Polivy J. External cues in the control of food intake in humans: The sensory-normative distinction. [Article; Proceedings Paper]. Physiology & Behavior 2008, 94(5):722-728.
11. Hogenkamp P.S., Mars M., Stafleu A., de Graaf C. Repeated consumption of a large volume of liquid and semi-solid foods increases ad libitum intake, but does not change expected satiety. Appetite 2012, 59(2):419-424. 10.1016/j.appet.2012.06.008.
12. Hogenkamp P.S., Stafleu A., Mars M., Brunstrom J.M., de Graaf C. Texture, not flavor, determines expected satiation of dairy products. [Article]. Appetite 2011, 57(3):635-641.
13. Hulshof T., Degraaf C., Weststrate J.A. The effects of preloads varying in physical state and fat-content on satiety and energy-intake. [Article]. Appetite 1993, 21(3):273-286.
14. Kirkmeyer S.V., Tepper B.J. Consumer reactions to creaminess and genetic sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil. A multidimensional study. [Article]. Food Quality and Preference 2005, 16(6):545-556.
15. Mars M., Hogenkamp P.S., Gosses A.M., Stafleu A., De Graaf C. Effect of viscosity on learned satiation. Physiology & Behavior 2009, 98(1-2):60-66.
16. Mattes R.D. Physiologic responses to sensory stimulation by food: Nutritional implications. [Review]. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 1997, 97(4):406.
17. Mattes R.D. Soup and satiety. [Article]. Physiology & Behavior 2005, 83(5):739-747.
18. Mattes R.D. Fluid calories and energy balance. The good, the bad, and the uncertain. [Article; Proceedings Paper]. Physiology & Behavior 2006, 89(1):66-70.
19. Mattes R.D. Orosensory considerations. [Article]. Obesity 2006, 14:164S-167S.
20. McCrickerd K., Chambers L., Brunstrom J.M., Yeomans M.R. Subtle changes in the flavour and texture of a drink enhance expectations of satiety. Flavour 2012, 1(20).
21. Mills T., Norton I.T., Bakalis S. Development of tribology equipment to study dynamic processes. Journal of Food Engineering 2013, 114(3):384-390. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2012.08.030.
22. Mourao D.M., Bressan J., Campbell W.W., Mattes R.D. Effects of food form on appetite and energy intake in lean and obese young adults. [Article]. International Journal of Obesity 2007, 31(11):1688-1695.
23. Rosnow R.L., Rosenthal R., Rubin D.B. Contrasts and correlations in effect-size estimation. [Article]. Psychological Science 2000, 11(6):446-453.
24. Stunkard A.J., Messick S. The 3-factor eating questionnaire to measure dietary restraint, disinhibition and hunger. [Article]. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 1985, 29(1):71-83.
25. Teff K.L. Cephalic phase pancreatic polypeptide responses to liquid and solid stimuli in humans. [Article]. Physiology & Behavior 2010, 99(3):317-323.
26. Teff K.L., Devine J., Engelman K. Sweet taste. Effect on cephalic phase insulin release in men. Physiology & Behavior 1995, 57(6):1089-1095.
27. Tournier A., Louis-Sylvestre J. Effect of the physical state of a food on subsequent intake in human subjects. Appetite 1991, 16(1):17-24.
28. Wilkinson L.L., Hinton E.C., Fay S.H., Ferriday D., Rogers P.J., Brunstrom J.M. Computer-based assessments of expected satiety predict behavioural measures of portion-size selection and food intake. [Article]. Appetite 2012, 59(3):933-938.
29. Woods S.C. The eating paradox. How we tolerate food. [Review]. Psychological Review 1991, 98(4):488-505.
30. Yeomans M.R. Rating changes over the course of meals. What do they tell us about motivation to eat? [Review]. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 2000, 24(2):249-259.
31. Yeomans M.R., Chambers L. Satiety-relevant sensory qualities enhance the satiating effects of mixed carbohydrate-protein preloads. [Article]. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2011, 94(6):1410-1417.
32. Zijlstra N., Mars M., de Wijk R.A., Westerterp-Plantenga M.S., de Graaf C. The effect of viscosity on ad libitum food intake. [Article]. International Journal of Obesity 2008, 32(4):676-683.