Effects of oral and gastric stimulation on appetite and energy intake

Obesity

Volumn 20, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 2226-2232

  Wijlens, Anne G M ^a   Erkner, Alfrun ^b   Alexander, Erin ^b   Mars, Monica ^a   Smeets, Paul A M ^a,c   De Graaf, Cees ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b NESTLÉ RESEARCH CENTER   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; APPETITE; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CALORIC INTAKE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HUNGER; LIQUID; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; ORAL STIMULATION; SENSORY STIMULATION; STOMACH STIMULATION;

APPETITE; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; EATING; ENERGY INTAKE; HUMANS; INTUBATION, GASTROINTESTINAL; MALE; SATIATION; STOMACH; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84868197447     PISSN: 19307381     EISSN: 1930739X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/oby.2012.131     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Rolls BJ. Plenary Lecture 1: Dietary strategies for the prevention and treatment of obesity. Proc Nutr Soc 2010;69:70-79.
2. Rolls BJ. The relationship between dietary energy density and energy intake. Physiol Behav 2009;97:609-615.
3. de Graaf C, Kok FJ. Slow food, fast food and the control of food intake. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2010;6:290-293.
4. Chen L, Appel LJ, Loria C et al. Reduction in consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages is associated with weight loss: the PREMIER trial. Am J Clin Nutr 2009;89:1299-1306.
5. Raben A, Vasilaras TH, Møller AC, Astrup A. Sucrose compared with artificial sweeteners: different effects on ad libitum food intake and body weight after 10 wk of supplementation in overweight subjects. Am J Clin Nutr 2002;76:721-729.
6. DiMeglio D P, Mattes RD. Liquid versus solid carbohydrate: effects on food intake and body weight. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2000;24:794-800. (Pubitemid 30339280)
7. Zijlstra N, de Wijk RA, Mars M, Stafleu A, de Graaf C. Effect of bite size and oral processing time of a semisolid food on satiation. Am J Clin Nutr 2009;90:269-275.
8. Zijlstra N, Mars M, de Wijk RA, Westerterp-Plantenga MS, de Graaf C. The effect of viscosity on ad libitum food intake. Int J Obes (Lond) 2008;32:676-683. (Pubitemid 351536016)
9. Weijzen PL, Smeets PA, de Graaf C. Sip size of orangeade: effects on intake and sensory-specific satiation. Br J Nutr 2009;102:1091-1097.
10. Zijlstra N, Mars M, Stafleu A, de Graaf C. The effect of texture differences on satiation in 3 pairs of solid foods. Appetite 2010;55:490-497.
11. Bell EA, Roe LS, Rolls BJ. Sensory-specific satiety is affected more by volume than by energy content of a liquid food. Physiol Behav 2003;78:593-600. (Pubitemid 36628086)
12. Rolls BJ, Roe LS. Effect of the volume of liquid food infused intragastrically on satiety in women. Physiol Behav 2002;76:623-631. (Pubitemid 34786689)
13. Poppitt SD, Prentice AM. Energy density and its role in the control of food intake: evidence from metabolic and community studies. Appetite 1996;26:153-174. (Pubitemid 26131175)
14. Rolls BJ, Castellanos VH, Halford JC et al. Volume of food consumed affects satiety in men. Am J Clin Nutr 1998;67:1170-1177. (Pubitemid 28259504)
15. Smeets AJ, Lejeune M P, Westerterp-Plantenga MS. Effects of oral fat perception by modified sham feeding on energy expenditure, hormones and appetite profile in the postprandial state. Br J Nutr 2009;101:1360-1368.
16. Smeets AJ, Westerterp-Plantenga MS. Satiety and substrate mobilization after oral fat stimulation. Br J Nutr 2006;95:795-801.
17. Robertson MD. Food perception and postprandial lipid metabolism. Physiol Behav 2006;89:4-9. (Pubitemid 44164465)
18. Teff KL, Engelman K. Oral sensory stimulation improves glucose tolerance in humans: effects on insulin, C-peptide, and glucagon. Am J Physiol 1996;270:R1371-R1379.
19. Stratton RJ, Stubbs RJ, Elia M. Bolus tube feeding suppresses food intake and circulating ghrelin concentrations in healthy subjects in a short-term placebo-controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr 2008;88:77-83. (Pubitemid 351988686)
20. Robinson TM, Gray RW, Yeomans MR, French SJ. Test-meal palatability alters the effects of intragastric fat but not carbohydrate preloads on intake and rated appetite in healthy volunteers. Physiol Behav 2005;84:193-203. (Pubitemid 40222714)
21. Parker BA, Doran S, Wishart J, Horowitz M, Chapman IM. Effects of small intestinal and gastric glucose administration on the suppression of plasma ghrelin concentrations in healthy older men and women. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2005;62:539-546. (Pubitemid 40646719)
22. Shide DJ, Caballero B, Reidelberger R, Rolls BJ. Accurate energy compensation for intragastric and oral nutrients in lean males. Am J Clin Nutr 1995;61:754-764.
23. Schick RR, Schusdziarra V, Schröder B, Classen M. Effect of intraduodenal or intragastric nutrient infusion on food intake in man. Z Gastroenterol 1991;29:637-641.
24. Lavin JH, French SJ, Read NW. Comparison of oral and gastric administration of sucrose and maltose on gastric emptying rate and appetite. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2002;26:80-86. (Pubitemid 34098673)
25. Cecil JE, Francis J, Read NW. Comparison of the effects of a high-fat and high-carbohydrate soup delivered orally and intragastrically on gastric emptying, appetite, and eating behaviour. Physiol Behav 1999;67:299-306. (Pubitemid 29361432)
26. Cecil JE, Francis J, Read NW. Relative contributions of intestinal, gastric, oro-sensory influences and information to changes in appetite induced by the same liquid meal. Appetite 1998;31:377-390. (Pubitemid 29020920)
27. Van Strien T. Nederlandse Vragenlijst voor Eetgedrag. Handleiding (Dutch Eating Behaviour Questionnaire. Manual). Boom Test Publishers: Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 2005.
28. Robertson MD, Mason AO, Frayn KN. Timing of vagal stimulation affects postprandial lipid metabolism in humans. Am J Clin Nutr 2002;76:71-77. (Pubitemid 34686551)
29. Heath RB, Jones R, Frayn KN, Robertson MD. Vagal stimulation exaggerates the inhibitory ghrelin response to oral fat in humans. J Endocrinol 2004;180:273-281. (Pubitemid 38312608)
30. Hill AJ, Rogers PJ, Blundell JE. Techniques for the experimental measurement of human eating behaviour and food intake: a practical guide. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1995;19:361-375.
31. Tarasuk V, Beaton GH. Day-to-day variation in energy and nutrient intake: evidence of individuality in eating behaviour? Appetite 1992;18:43-54.
32. Bolhuis D P, Lakemond CM, de Wijk RA, Luning PA, Graaf C. Both longer oral sensory exposure to and higher intensity of saltiness decrease ad libitum food intake in healthy normal-weight men. J Nutr 2011;141:2242-2248.
33. Zafra MA, Molina F, Puerto A. The neural/cephalic phase reflexes in the physiology of nutrition. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2006;30:1032-1044. (Pubitemid 44376486)
34. Smeets PA, Erkner A, de Graaf C. Cephalic phase responses and appetite. Nutr Rev 2010;68:643-655.
35. Teff KL. Cephalic phase pancreatic polypeptide responses to liquid and solid stimuli in humans. Physiol Behav 2010;99:317-323.
36. Teff KL, Devine J, Engelman K. Sweet taste: effect on cephalic phase insulin release in men. Physiol Behav 1995;57:1089-1095.
37. Woods SC. The eating paradox: how we tolerate food. Psychol Rev 1991;98:488-505.
38. Hu FB, Malik VS. Sugar-sweetened beverages and risk of obesity and type 2 diabetes: epidemiologic evidence. Physiol Behav 2010;100:47-54.
39. Malik VS, Popkin BM, Bray GA et al. Sugar-sweetened beverages and risk of metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis. Diabetes Care 2010;33:2477-2483.
40. Schulze MB, Manson JE, Ludwig DS et al. Sugar-sweetened beverages, weight gain, and incidence of type 2 diabetes in young and middle-aged women. JAMA 2004;292:927-934. (Pubitemid 39097202)
41. Ritter RC. Gastrointestinal mechanisms of satiation for food. Physiol Behav 2004;81:249-273. (Pubitemid 38678643)