Design of protein catalysts

Annual Review of Biochemistry

Volumn 82, Issue , 2013, Pages 447-470

  Hilvert, Donald ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Catalytic mechanism; Computation; Directed evolution; Engineering; Enzyme

Indexed keywords

ANTIBODY; ENZYME; PROTEIN;

DIELS ALDER REACTION; ENZYME ACTIVITY; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOPHILICITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS DESIGN; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN ENGINEERING; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTON TRANSPORT; REVIEW;

CATALYSIS; CATALYTIC DOMAIN; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DIRECTED MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; ENZYMES; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN ENGINEERING; PROTEINS;

ALNUS;

EID: 84878935468     PISSN: 00664154     EISSN: 15454509     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-072611-101825     Document Type: Review

References (122)

1. Benkovic SJ, Hammes-Schiffer S. 2003. A perspective on enzyme catalysis. Science 301:1196-202
2. Kraut DA, Carroll KS, Herschlag D. 2003. Challenges in enzyme mechanism and energetics. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 72:517-71
3. Garcia-Viloca M, Gao J, Karplus M, Truhlar DG. 2004. How enzymes work: analysis by modern rate theory and computer simulations. Science 303:186-95
4. Schmid A, Dordick JS, Hauer B, Kiener A, Wubbolts M, Witholt B. 2001. Industrial biocatalysis today and tomorrow. Nature 409:258-68
5. Schoemaker HE, Mink D, Wubbolts MG. 2003. Dispelling the myths-biocatalysis in industrial synthesis. Science 299:1694-97
6. Bornscheuer UT, Huisman GW, Kazlauskas RJ, Lutz S, Moore JC, Robins K. 2012. Engineering the third wave of biocatalysis. Nature 485:185-94
7. Shaw DE, Maragakis P, Lindorff-Larsen K, Piana S, Dror RO, et al. 2010. Atomic-level characterization of the structural dynamics of proteins. Science 330:341-46
8. Butterfoss GL, Kuhlman B. 2006. Computer-based design of novel protein structures. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 35:49-65
9. Pantazes RJ, Grisewood MJ, Maranas CD. 2011. Recent advances in computational protein design. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 21:467-72
10. Breslow R. 1995. Biomimetic chemistry and artificial enzymes: catalysis by design. Acc. Chem. Res. 28:146-53
11. Johnsson K, Allemann RK, Widmer H, Benner SA. 1993. Synthesis, structure and activity of artificial, rationally designed catalytic polypeptides. Nature 365:530-32
12. Davie EA, Mennen SM, Xu Y, Miller SJ. 2007. Asymmetric catalysis mediated by synthetic peptides. Chem. Rev. 107:5759-812
13. Sculimbrene BR, Morgan AJ, Miller SJ. 2003. Nonenzymatic peptide-based catalytic asymmetric phosphorylation of inositol derivatives. Chem. Commun. 1781-85
14. Gustafson JL, Lim D, Miller SJ. 2010. Dynamic kinetic resolution of biaryl atropisomers via peptidecatalyzed asymmetric bromination. Science 328:1251-55
15. Hill RB, Raleigh DP, Lombardi A, Degrado WF. 2000. De novo design of helical bundles as models for understanding protein folding and function. Acc. Chem. Res. 33:745-54
16. Smith BA, Hecht MH. 2011. Novel proteins: from fold to function. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 15:421-26
17. Zastrow ML, Peacock AF, Stuckey JA, Pecoraro VL. 2012. Hydrolytic catalysis and structural stabilization in a designed metalloprotein. Nat. Chem. 4:118-23
18. Faiella M, Andreozzi C, de Rosales RT, Pavone V, Maglio O, et al. 2009. An artificial di-iron oxo-protein with phenol oxidase activity. Nat. Chem. Biol. 5:882-84
19. Dahiyat BI, Mayo SL. 1997. De novo protein design: fully automated sequence selection. Science 278:82-87
20. Kuhlman B, Dantas G, Ireton GC, Varani G, Stoddard BL, Baker D. 2003. Design of a novel globular protein fold with atomic-level accuracy. Science 302:1364-68
21. Keefe AD, Szostak JW. 2001. Functional proteins from a random-sequence library. Nature 410:715-18
22. Bradley LH, Thumfort PP, Hecht MH. 2006. De novo proteins from binary-patterned combinatorial libraries. Methods Mol. Biol. 340:53-69
23. Fisher MA, McKinley KL, Bradley LH, Viola SR, Hecht MH. 2011. De novo designed proteins from a library of artificial sequences function in Escherichia coli and enable cell growth. PLoS ONE 6:e15364
24. Toscano MD, Woycechowsky KJ, Hilvert D. 2007. Minimalist active-site redesign: teaching old enzymes new tricks. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 46:3212-36
25. Seebeck FP, Hilvert D. 2003. Conversion of a PLP-dependent racemase into an aldolase by a single active site mutation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125:10158-59
26. Park H-S, Nam S-H, Lee JK, Yoon CN, Mannervik B, et al. 2006. Design and evolution of new catalytic activity with an existing protein scaffold. Science 311:535-38
27. Yuan L, Kurek I, English J, Keenan R. 2005. Laboratory-directed protein evolution. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 69:373-92
28. Reymond JL, ed. 2006. Enzyme Assays. Weinheim, Ger. : Wiley-VCH. 386 pp.
29. Arnold FH. 1998. Design by directed evolution. Acc. Chem. Res. 31:125-31
30. Reetz MT. 2006. Directed evolution of enantioselective enzymes as catalysts for organic synthesis. Adv. Catal. 49:1-69
31. Jackel C, Kast P, Hilvert D. 2008. Protein design by directed evolution. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 37:153-73
32. Romero PA, Arnold FH. 2009. Exploring protein fitness landscapes by directed evolution. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10:866-76
33. Turner NJ. 2009. Directed evolution drives the next generation of biocatalysts. Nat. Chem. Biol. 5:567-73
34. Pinheiro VB, Taylor AI, Cozens C, Abramov M, Renders M, et al. 2012. Synthetic genetic polymers capable of heredity and evolution. Science 336:341-44
35. Liu W, Alfonta L, Mack AV, Schultz PG. 2007. Structural basis for the recognition of para-benzoyl-Lphenylalanine by evolved aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 46:6073-75
36. Liu CC, Schultz PG. 2010. Adding new chemistries to the genetic code. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 79:413-44
37. Khersonsky O, Roodveldt C, Tawfik DS. 2006. Enzyme promiscuity: evolutionary and mechanistic aspects. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 10:498-508
38. Wu Z-P, Hilvert D. 1990. Selenosubtilisin as a glutathione peroxidase mimic. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 112:5647-48
39. Liu X, Yu Y, Hu C, Zhang W, Lu Y, Wang J. 2012. Significant increase of oxidase activity through the genetic incorporation of a tyrosine-histidine cross-link in a myoglobin model of heme-copper oxidase. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51:4312-16
40. Yeung N, Lin YW, Gao YG, Zhao X, Russell BS, et al. 2009. Rational design of a structural and functional nitric oxide reductase. Nature 462:1079-82
41. Kaiser ET, Lawrence DS. 1984. Chemical mutation of enzyme active sites. Science 226:505-11
42. Heinisch T, Ward TR. 2010. Design strategies for the creation of artificial metalloenzymes. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 14:184-99
43. Mayer C, Gillingham DG, Ward TR, Hilvert D. 2011. An artificial metalloenzyme for olefin metathesis. Chem. Commun. 47:12068-70
44. Hyster TK, Knörr L, Ward TR, Rovis T. 2012. Biotinylated Rh(III) complexes in engineered streptavidin for accelerated asymmetric C-H activation. Science 338:500-3
45. Hilvert D. 2000. Critical analysis of antibody catalysis. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 69:751-93
46. Schultz PG, Yin J, Lerner RA. 2002. The chemistry of the antibody molecule. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 41:4427-37
47. Schultz PG, Lerner RA. 1993. Antibody catalysis of difficult chemical transformations. Acc. Chem. Res. 26:391-95
48. Stewart JD, Benkovic SJ. 1995. Transition-state stabilization as a measure of the efficiency of antibody catalysis. Nature 375:388-91
49. Richter F, Leaver-Fay A, Khare SD, Bjelic S, Baker D. 2011. De novo enzyme design using Rosetta3. PLoS ONE 6:e19230
50. Lassila JK, Privett HK, Allen BD, Mayo SL. 2006. Combinatorial methods for small-molecule placement in computational enzyme design. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103:16710-15
51. Tantillo DJ, Chen J, Houk KN. 1998. Theozymes and compuzymes: theoretical models for biological catalysis. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2:743-50
52. Zanghellini A, Jiang L, Wollacott AM, Cheng G, Meiler J, et al. 2006. New algorithms and an in silico benchmark for computational enzyme design. Protein Sci. 15:2785-94
53. Bolon DN, Mayo SL. 2001. Enzyme-like proteins by computational design. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:14274-79
54. Malisi C, Kohlbacher O, Hocker B. 2009. Automated scaffold selection for enzyme design. Proteins 77:74-83
55. Meiler J, Baker D. 2006. ROSETTALIGAND: protein-small molecule docking with full side-chain flexibility. Proteins 65:538-48
56. Siegel JB, Zanghellini A, Lovick HM, Kiss G, Lambert AR, et al. 2010. Computational design of an enzyme catalyst for a stereoselective bimolecular Diels-Alder reaction. Science 329:309-13
57. Röthlisberger D, Khersonsky O, Wollacott AM, Jiang L, DeChancie J, et al. 2008. Kemp elimination catalysts by computational enzyme design. Nature 453:19095
58. Privett HK, Kiss G, Lee TM, Blomberg R, Chica RA, et al. 2012. Iterative approach to computational enzyme design. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109:3790-95
59. Korendovych IV, Kulp DW, Wu Y, Cheng H, Roder H, DeGrado WF. 2011. Design of a switchable eliminase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108:6823-27
60. Jiang L, Althoff EA, Clemente FR, Doyle L, Rothlisberger D, et al. 2008. De novo computational design of retro-aldol enzymes. Science 319:1387-91
61. Althoff EA, Wang L, Jiang L, Giger L, Lassila JK, et al. 2012. Robust design and optimization of retroaldol enzymes. Protein Sci. 21:717-26
62. Khare SD, Kipnis Y, Greisen P Jr, Takeuchi R, Ashani Y, et al. 2012. Computational redesign of a mononuclear zinc metalloenzyme for organophosphate hydrolysis. Nat. Chem. Biol. 8:294-300
63. Gouverneur VE, Houk KN, Pascual-Teresa B, Beno B, Janda KD, Lerner RA. 1993. Control of the exo and endo pathways of the Diels-Alder reaction by antibody catalysis. Science 262:204-8
64. Eiben CB, Siegel JB, Bale JB, Cooper S, Khatib F, et al. 2012. Increased Diels-Alderase activity through backbone remodeling guided by Foldit players. Nat. Biotechnol. 30:190-92
65. Cooper S, Khatib F, Treuille A, Barbero J, Lee J, et al. 2010. Predicting protein structures with a multiplayer online game. Nature 466:756-60
66. Casey ML, Kemp DS, Paul KG, Cox DD. 1973. Physical organic chemistry of benzisoxazoles. 1. Mechanism of base-catalyzed decomposition of benzisoxazoles. J. Org. Chem. 38:2294-301
67. Kemp DS, Casey ML. 1973. Physical organic chemistry of benzisoxazoles. II. Linearity of the Brsted free energy relationship for the base-catalyzed decomposition of benzisoxazoles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 95:6670-80
68. Kemp DS, Cox DD, Paul K. 1975. The physical organic chemistry of benzisoxazoles. IV. The origins and catalytic nature of the solvent rate acceleration for the decarboxylation of 3-carboxybenzisoxazoles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 97:7312-18
69. Thorn SN, Daniels RG, Auditor MTM, Hilvert D. 1995. Large rate accelerations in antibody catalysis by strategic use of haptenic charge. Nature 373:228-30
70. Müller R, Debler EW, Steinmann M, Seebeck FP, Wilson IA, Hilvert D. 2007. Bifunctional catalysis of proton transfer at an antibody active site. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129:460-61
71. Debler EW, Ito S, Seebeck FP, Heine A, Hilvert D, Wilson IA. 2005. Structural origins of efficient proton abstraction from carbon by a catalytic antibody. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102:4984-89
72. Debler EW, Müller R, Hilvert D, Wilson IA. 2009. An aspartate and a water molecule mediate efficient acid-base catalysis in a tailored antibody pocket. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106:18539-44
73. Kirby AJ. 1980. Effective molarities for intramolecular reactions. Adv. Phys. Org. Chem. 17:183-278
74. Bearne SL, Wolfenden R. 1997. Mandelate racemase in pieces: effective concentrations of enzyme functional groups in the transition state. Biochemistry 36:1646-56
75. Khersonsky O, Röthlisberger D, Dym O, Albeck S, Jackson CJ, et al. 2010. Evolutionary optimization of computationally designed enzymes: Kemp eliminases of the KE07 series. J. Mol. Biol. 396:1025-42
76. Khersonsky O, Röthlisberger D, Wollacott AM, Murphy P, Dym O, et al. 2011. Optimization of the in-silico-designed Kemp eliminase KE70 by computational design and directed evolution. J. Mol. Biol. 407:391-412
77. Khersonsky O, Kiss G, Röthlisberger D, Dym O, Albeck S, et al. 2012. Bridging the gaps in design methodologies by evolutionary optimization of the stability and proficiency of designed Kemp eliminase KE59. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109:10358-63
78. Kiss G, Röthlisberger D, Baker D, Houk KN. 2010. Evaluation and ranking of enzyme designs. Protein Sci. 19:1760-73
79. Frushicheva MP, Cao J, Chu ZT, Warshel A. 2010. Exploring challenges in rational enzyme design by simulating the catalysis in artificial Kemp eliminase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107:16869-74
80. Wolfenden R, Snider MJ. 2001. The depth of chemical time and the power of enzymes as catalysts. Acc. Chem. Res. 34:938-45
81. Kipnis Y, Baker D. 2012. Comparison of designed and randomly generated catalysts for simple chemical reactions. Protein Sci. 21:1388-95
82. Richard JP, Amyes TL. 2001. Proton transfer at carbon. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 5:626-33
83. Gefflaut T, Blonski C, Perie J, Willson M. 1995. Class I aldolases: substrate specificity, mechanism, inhibitors and structural aspects. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 63:301-40
84. Machajewski TD, Wong CH. 2000. The catalytic asymmetric aldol reaction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 39:1352-75
85. Wang L, Althoff EA, Bolduc J, Jiang L, Moody J, et al. 2012. Structural analyses of covalent enzymesubstrate analog complexes reveal strengths and limitations of de novo enzyme design. J. Mol. Biol. 415:615-25
86. Tanaka F, Fuller R, Barbas CF III. 2005. Development of small designer aldolase enzymes: catalytic activity, folding, and substrate specificity. Biochemistry 44:7583-92
87. Müller MM, Windsor MA, Pomerantz WC, Gellman SH, Hilvert D. 2009. Arationally designed aldolase foldamer. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48:922-25
88. Lassila JK, Baker D, Herschlag D. 2010. Origins of catalysis by computationally designed retroaldolase enzymes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107:4937-42
89. Wagner J, Lerner RA, Barbas CF III. 1995. Efficient aldolase catalytic antibodies that use the enamine mechanism of natural enzymes. Science 270:1797-800
90. Barbas CF III, Heine A, Zhong G, Hoffmann T, Gramatikova S, et al. 1997. Immune versus natural selection: antibody aldolases with enzymic rates but broader scope. Science 278:2085-92
91. List B, Barbas CF III, Lerner RA. 1998. Aldol sensors for the rapid generation of tunable fluorescence by antibody catalysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:15351-55
92. Zhu X, Tanaka F, Lerner RA, Barbas CF, Wilson IA. 2009. Direct observation of an enamine intermediate in amine catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131:18206-7
93. Giger L, Caner S, Obexer R, Kast P, Baker D, Ban N, Hilvert D. 2012. Complete active site remodeling during evolution of a de novo retro-aldolase enzyme. Nat. Chem. Biol. In press
94. Ruscio JZ, Kohn JE, Ball KA, Head-Gordon T. 2009. The influence of protein dynamics on the success of computational enzyme design. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131:14111-15
95. Lu Y, Yeung N, Sieracki N, Marshall NM. 2009. Design of functional metalloproteins. Nature 460:855-62
96. Nanda V, Koder RL. 2010. Designing artificial enzymes by intuition and computation. Nat. Chem. 2:15-24
97. Hellinga HW, Richards FM. 1991. Construction of new ligand binding sites in proteins of known structure. I. Computer-aided modeling of sites with pre-defined geometry. J. Mol. Biol. 222:763-85
98. Clarke ND, Yuan SM. 1995. Metal Search: a computer program that helps design tetrahedral metalbinding sites. Proteins 23:256-63
99. Fazelinia H, Cirino PC, Maranas CD. 2009. OptGraft: a computational procedure for transferring a binding site onto an existing protein scaffold. Protein Sci. 18:180-95
100. Benson DE, Wisz MS, Hellinga HW. 2000. Rational design of nascentmetalloenzymes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:6292-97
101. Pinto AL, Hellinga HW, Caradonna JP. 1997. Construction of a catalytically active iron superoxide dismutase by rational protein design. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:5562-67
102. Der BS, Edwards DR, Kuhlman B. 2012. Catalysis by a de novo zinc-mediated protein interface: implications for natural enzyme evolution and rational enzyme engineering. Biochemistry 51:3933-40
103. Gupta RD, Goldsmith M, Ashani Y, Simo Y, Mullokandov G, et al. 2011. Directed evolution of hydrolases for prevention of G-type nerve agent intoxication. Nat. Chem. Biol. 7:120-25
104. Gerlt JA, Babbitt PC. 2001. Divergent evolution of enzymatic function: mechanistically diverse superfamilies and functionally distinct suprafamilies. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 70:209-46
105. Murphy PM, Bolduc JM, Gallaher JL, Stoddard BL, Baker D. 2009. Alteration of enzyme specificity by computational loop remodeling and design. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106:9215-20
106. Richter F, Blomberg R, Khare SD, Kiss G, Kuzin AP, et al. 2012. Computational design of catalytic dyads and oxyanion holes for ester hydrolysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134:16197-206
107. Baker D. 2010. An exciting but challenging road ahead for computational enzyme design. Protein Sci. 19:181719
108. Dechancie J, Clemente FR, Smith AJ, Gunaydin H, Zhao YL, et al. 2007. How similar are enzyme active site geometries derived from quantum mechanical theozymes to crystal structures of enzyme-inhibitor complexes? Implications for enzyme design. Protein Sci. 16:1851-66
109. Zhang X, DeChancie J, Gunaydin H, Chowdry AB, Clemente FR, et al. 2008. Quantum mechanical design of enzyme active sites. J. Org. Chem. 73:889-99
110. Acevedo O, Jorgensen WL. 2010. Advances in quantum and molecular mechanical (QM/MM) simulations for organic and enzymatic reactions. Acc. Chem. Res. 43:142-51
111. Kuhlman B, Baker D. 2000. Native protein sequences are close to optimal for their structures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:10383-88
112. Warshel A, Sharma PK, Kato M, Xiang Y, Liu H, Olsson MH. 2006. Electrostatic basis for enzyme catalysis. Chem. Rev. 106:3210-35
113. Kortemme T, Morozov AV, Baker D. 2003. An orientation-dependent hydrogen bonding potential improves prediction of specificity and structure for proteins and protein-protein complexes. J. Mol. Biol. 326:1239-59
114. Lazaridis T, Karplus M. 1999. Effective energy function for proteins in solution. Proteins 35:132-52
115. Whitehead TA, Chevalier A, Song YF, Dreyfus C, Fleishman SJ, et al. 2012. Optimization of affinity, specificity and function of designed influenza inhibitors using deep sequencing. Nat. Biotechnol. 30:543-48
116. Alexandrova AN, Rothlisberger D, Baker D, Jorgensen WL. 2008. Catalyticmechanism and performance of computationally designed enzymes for Kemp elimination. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130:15907-15
117. Frushicheva MP, Cao J, Warshel A. 2011. Challenges and advances in validating enzyme design proposals: the case of Kemp eliminase catalysis. Biochemistry 50:3849-58
118. Jackel C, Hilvert D. 2010. Biocatalysts by evolution. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 21:75359
119. Nagel ZD, Klinman JP. 2009. A 21st century revisionists view at a turning point in enzymology. Nat. Chem. Biol. 5:543-50
120. Tokuriki N, Tawfik DS. 2009. Protein dynamism and evolvability. Science 324:203-7
121. Trifonov EN, Frenkel ZM. 2009. Evolution of protein modularity. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 19:335-40
122. Wagner A. 2005. Robustness, evolvability, and neutrality. FEBS Lett. 579:1772-78