Computer-based design of novel protein structures

Annual Review of Biophysics and Biomolecular Structure

Volumn 35, Issue , 2006, Pages 49-65

  Butterfoss, Glenn L ^a   Kuhlman, Brian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Computational protein design; Flexible backbone design; Molecular modeling; Negative design; Protein stability

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID; MEMBRANE PROTEIN;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; MOLECULAR MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STABILITY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; REVIEW;

ALGORITHMS; BINDING SITES; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DRUG DESIGN; DRUG STABILITY; MODELS, CHEMICAL; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, PROTEIN; SOFTWARE;

EID: 33745033790     PISSN: 10568700     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.biophys.35.040405.102046     Document Type: Review

References (83)

1. Baldwin EP, Hajiseyedjavadi O, Baase WA, Matthews BW. 1993. The role of backbone flexibility in the accommodation of variants that repack the core of T4 lysozyme. Science 262:1715-18
2. Bolon DN, Grant RA, Baker TA, Sauer RT. 2005. Specificity versus stability in computational protein design. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102:12724-29
3. Bradley P, Misura KM, Baker D. 2005. Toward high-resolution de novo structure prediction for small proteins. Science 309:1868-71
4. Calhoun JR, Nastri F, Maglio O, Pavone V, Lombardi A, DeGrado WF. 2005. Artificial diiron proteins: from structure to function. Biopolymers 80:264-78
5. Cheng RP, Gellman SH, DeGrado WF. 2001. β-Peptides: from structure to function. Chem. Rev. 101:3219-32
6. Chevalier BS, Kortemme T, Chadsey MS, Baker D, Monnat RJ, Stoddard BL. 2002. Design, activity, and structure of a highly specific artificial endonuclease. Mol. Cell 10:895-905
7. Crick FHC. 1953. The Fourier transform of a coiled-coil. Acta Crystallogr. 6:685-89
8. Dahiyat BI, Mayo SL. 1997. De novo protein design: fully automated sequence selection. Science 278:82-87
9. Dahiyat BI, Mayo SL. 1997. Probing the role of packing specificity in protein design. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:10172-77
10. DeGrado WF, Wasserman ZR, Lear JD. 1989. Protein design, a minimalist approach. Science 243:022-28
11. Desjarlais JR, Handel TM. 1995. De novo design of the hydrophobic cores of proteins. Protein Sci. 4:2006-18
12. Desjarlais JR, Handel TM. 1999. Side-chain and backbone flexibility in protein core design. J. Mol. Biol. 290:305-18
13. Desmet J, Maeyer MD, Hazes B, Lasters I. 1992. The dead-end elimination theorem and its use in protein side-chain positioning. Nature 356:539-41
14. Dunbrack RL Jr, Cohen FE. 1997. Bayesian statistical analysis of protein side-chain rotamer preferences. Protein Sci. 6:1661-81
15. Dwyer MA, Looger LL, Hellinga HW. 2004. Computational design of a biologically active enzyme. Science 304:1967-71
16. Gordon DB, Hom GK, Mayo SL, Pierce NA. 2003. Exact rotamer optimization for protein design. J. Comput. Chem. 24:232-43
17. Gordon DB, Marshall SA, Mayo SL. 1999. Energy functions for protein design. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 9:509-13
18. Guerois R, Nielsen JE, Serrano L. 2002. Predicting changes in the stability of proteins and protein complexes: a study of more than 1000 mutations. J. Mol. Biol. 320:309-87
19. Harbury PB, Plecs JJ, Tidor B, Alber T, Kim PS. 1998. High-resolution protein design with backbone freedom. Science 282:1462-67
20. Harbury PB, Tidor B, Kim PS. 1995. Repacking protein cores with backbone freedom: structure prediction for coiled coils. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:8408-12
21. Havranek JJ, Harbury PB. 1999. Tanford-Kirkwood electrostatics for protein modeling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:11145-50
22. Havranek JJ, Harbury PB. 2003. Automated design of specificity in molecular recognition. Nat. Struct. Biol. 10:45-52
23. Huang PS, Love JJ, Mayo SL. 2005. Adaptation of a fast Fourier transform-based docking algorithm for protein design. J. Comput. Chem. 26:1222-32
24. Jaramillo A, Wernisch L, Hery S, Wodak SJ. 2001. Automatic procedures for protein design. Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screen. 4:643-59
25. Jin W, Kambara O, Sasakawa H, Tamura A, Takada S. 2003. De novo design of foldable proteins with smooth folding funnel: automated negative design and experimental verification. Structure 11:581-90
26. Keating AE, Malashkevich VN, Tidor B, Kim PS. 2001. Side-chain repacking calculations for predicting structures and stabilities of heterodimeric coiled coils. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:14825-30
27. Koehl P, Delarue M. 1994. Application of a self-consistent mean field theory to predict protein side-chains conformation and estimate their conformational entropy. J. Mol. Biol. 239:249-75
28. Koehl P, Levitt M. 1999. De novo protein design. II. Plasticity in sequence space. J. Mol. Biol. 293:1183-93
29. Kono H, Saven JG. 2001. Statistical theory for protein combinatorial libraries. Packing interactions, backbone flexibility, and the sequence variability of a main-chain structure. J. Mol. Biol. 306:607-28
30. Kortemme T, Baker D. 2004. Computational design of protein-protein interactions. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 8:91-97
31. Kortemme T, Morozov AV, Baker D. 2003. An orientation-dependent hydrogen bonding potential improves prediction of specificity and structure for proteins and protein-protein complexes. J. Mol. Biol. 326:1239-59
32. Kraemer-Pecore CM, Lecomte JT, Desjarlais JR. 2003. A de novo redesign of the WW domain. Protein Sci. 12:2194-205
33. Kuhlman B, Baker D. 2000. Native protein sequences are close to optimal for their structures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:10383-88
34. Kuhlman B, Baker D. 2004. Exploring folding free energy landscapes using computational protein design. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 14:89-95
35. Kuhlman B, Dantas G, Ireton GC, Varani G, Stoddard BL, Baker D. 2003. Design of a novel globular protein fold with atomic-level accuracy. Science 302:1364-68
36. Kuhlman B, O'Neill JW, Kim DE, Zhang KY, Baker D. 2002. Accurate computer-based design of a new backbone conformation in the second turn of protein L. J. Mol. Biol. 315:471-77
37. Lacroix E, Kortemme T, Lopez de la Paz M, Serrano L. 1999. The design of linear peptides that fold as monomeric beta-sheet structures. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 9:487-93
38. Larson SM, England JL, Desjarlais JR, Pande VS. 2002. Thoroughly sampling sequence space: large-scale protein design of structural ensembles. Protein Sci. 11:2804-13
39. Larson SM, Garg A, Desjarlais JR, Pande VS. 2003. Increased detection of structural templates using alignments of designed sequences. Proteins 51:390-96
40. Lasters I, Wodak SJ, Alard P, van Cutsem E. 1988. Structural principles of parallel beta-barrels in proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85:3338-42
41. Lasters I, Wodak SJ, Pio F. 1990. The design of idealized alpha/beta-barrels: analysis of beta-sheet closure requirements. Proteins 7:249-56
42. Lazaridis T, Karplus M. 2000. Effective energy functions for protein structure prediction. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 10:139-45
43. Liang S, Grishin NV. 2002. Side-chain modeling with an optimized scoring function. Protein Sci. 11:322-31
44. Liang S, Grishin NV. 2004. Effective scoring function for protein sequence design. Proteins 54:271-81
45. Lim WA, Hodel A, Sauer RT, Richards FM. 1994. The crystal structure of a mutant protein with altered but improved hydrophobic core packing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:423-27
46. Lombardi A, Summa CM, Geremia S, Randaccio L, Pavone V, DeGrado WF. 2000. Inaugural article: retrostructural analysis of metalloproteins: application to the design of a minimal model for diiron proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:6298-305
47. Looger LL, Dwyer MA, Smith JJ, Hellinga HW. 2003. Computational design of receptor and sensor proteins with novel functions. Nature 423:185-90
48. Looger LL, Hellinga HW. 2001. Generalized dead-end elimination algorithms make large-scale protein side-chain structure prediction tractable: implications for protein design and structural genomics. J. Mol. Biol. 307:429-45
49. Lovell SC, Word JM, Richardson JS, Richardson DC. 2000. The penultimate rotamer library. Proteins 40:389-408
50. Malakauskas SM, Mayo SL. 1998. Design, structure and stability of a hyperthermophilic protein variant. Nat. Struct. Biol. 5:470-75
51. Mendes J, Guerois R, Serrano L. 2002. Energy estimation in protein design. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 12:441-46
52. Morozov AV, Kortemme T, Tsemekhman K, Baker D. 2004. Close agreement between the orientation dependence of hydrogen bonds observed in protein structures and quantum mechanical calculations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:6946-51
53. Murzin AG, Lesk AM, Chothia C. 1994. Principles determining the structure of beta-sheet barrels in proteins. I. A theoretical analysis. J. Mol. Biol. 236:1369-81
54. Murzin AG, Lesk AM, Chothia C. 1994. Principles determining the structure of beta-sheet barrels in proteins. II. The observed structures. J. Mol. Biol. 236:1382-400
55. Offredi F, Dubail F, Kischel P, Sarinski K, Stern AS, et al. 2003. De novo backbone and sequence design of an idealized alpha/beta-barrel protein: evidence of stable tertiary structure. J. Mol. Biol. 325:163-74
56. Park S, Yang X, Saven JG. 2004. Advances in computational protein design. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 14:487-94
57. Plecs JJ, Harbury PB, Kim PS, Alber T. 2004. Structural test of the parameterized-backbone method for protein design. J. Mol. Biol. 342:289-97
58. Pokala N, Handel TM. 2001. Review, protein design-where we were, where we are, where we're going. J. Struct. Biol. 134:269-81
59. Pokala N, Handel TM. 2004. Energy functions for protein design. I. Efficient and accurate continuum electrostatics and solvation. Protein Sci. 13:925-36
60. Pokala N, Handel TM. 2005. Energy functions for protein design: adjustment with protein-protein complex affinities, models for the unfolded state, and negative design of solubility and specificity. J. Mol. Biol. 347:203-27
61. Ponder JW, Richards FM. 1987. Tertiary templates for proteins. Use of packing criteria in the enumeration of allowed sequences for different structural classes. J. Mol. Biol. 193:775-91
62. Reina J, Lacroix E, Hobson SD, Fernandez-Ballester G, Rybin V, et al. 2002. Computer-aided design of a PDZ domain to recognize new target sequences. Nat. Struct. Biol. 9:621-27
63. Richardson JS, Richardson DC. 1989. The de novo design of protein structures. Trends Biochem. Sci. 14:304-9
64. Rohl CA, Strauss CE, Misura KM, Baker D. 2004. Protein structure prediction using Rosetta. Methods Enzymol. 383:66-93
65. Ross SA, Sarisky CA, Su A, Mayo SL. 2001. Designed protein G core variants fold to native-like structures: Sequence selection by ORBIT tolerates variation in backbone specification. Protein Sci. 10:450-54
66. Saunders CT, Baker D. 2005. Recapitulation of protein family divergence using flexible backbone protein design. J. Mol. Biol. 346:631-44
67. Shifman JM, Mayo SL. 2003. Exploring the origins of binding specificity through the computational redesign of calmodulin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:13274-79
68. Shimaoka M, Shifman JM, Jing H, Takagi J, Mayo SL, Springer TA. 2000. Computational design of an integrin I domain stabilized in the open high affinity conformation. Nat. Struct. Biol. 7:674-78
69. Sibanda BL, Thornton JM. 1985. Beta-hairpin families in globular proteins. Nature 316:170-74
70. Simons KT, Kooperberg C, Huang E, Baker D. 1997. Assembly of protein tertiary structures from fragments with similar local sequences using simulated annealing and Bayesian scoring functions. J. Mol. Biol. 268:209-25
71. Simons KT, Ruczinski I, Kooperberg C, Fox BA, Bystroff C, Baker D. 1999. Improved recognition of native-like protein structures using a combination of sequence-dependent and sequence-independent features of proteins. Proteins 34:82-95
72. Slovic AM, Kono H, Lear JD, Saven JG, DeGrado WF. 2004. Computational design of water-soluble analogues of the potassium channel KcsA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:1828-33
73. Smith GR, Sternberg MJ. 2002. Prediction of protein-protein interactions by docking methods. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 12:28-35
74. Street AG, Mayo SL. 1998. Pairwise calculation of protein solvent-accessible surface areas. Fold. Des. 3:253-58
75. Su A, Mayo SL. 1997. Coupling backbone flexibility and amino acid sequence selection in protein design. Protein Sci. 6:1701-7
76. Summa CM, Lombardi A, Lewis M, DeGrado WF. 1999. Tertiary templates for the design of diiron proteins. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 9:500-8
77. Summa CM, Rosenblatt MM, Hong JK, Lear JD, DeGrado WF. 2002. Computational de novo design, and characterization of an A(2)B(2) diiron protein. J. Mol. Biol. 321:923-38
78. 77a. Ventura S, Serrano L. 2004. Designing proteins from the inside out. Proteins 56:1-10
79. Voigt CA, Gordon DB, Mayo SL. 2000. Trading accuracy for speed: a quantitative comparison of search algorithms in protein sequence design. J. Mol. Biol. 299:789-803
80. Weber PC, Salemme FR. 1980. Structural and functional diversity in 4-alpha-helical proteins. Nature 287:82-84
81. Wernisch L, Hery S, Wodak SJ. 2000. Automatic protein design with all atom force-fields by exact and heuristic optimization. J. Mol. Biol. 301:713-36
82. Wisz MS, Hellinga HW. 2003. An empirical model for electrostatic interactions in proteins incorporating multiple geometry-dependent dielectric constants. Proteins 51:360-77
83. Wollacott AM, Desjarlais JR. 2001. Virtual interaction profiles of proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 313:317-42