Protein design by directed evolution

Annual Review of Biophysics

Volumn 37, Issue , 2008, Pages 153-173

  Jäckel, Christian ^a   Kast, Peter ^a   Hilvert, Donald ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Computational design; Enzymes; Molecular diversity; Random mutagenesis; Screening; Selection

Indexed keywords

BIOPOLYMER; POLYPEPTIDE; PROTEIN; RECEPTOR; ENZYME;

ALGORITHM; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CATALYST; EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MUTAGENESIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; REVIEW; SCREENING; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; ENZYME ACTIVITY; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FLUORESCENCE ACTIVATED CELL SORTING; HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; METHANOCOCCUS JANNASCHII; PROTEIN QUATERNARY STRUCTURE; TASK PERFORMANCE; CHEMISTRY; DIRECTED MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; GENETICS; METHODOLOGY; PROTEIN ENGINEERING; SITE DIRECTED MUTAGENESIS; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

DIRECTED MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MUTAGENESIS, SITE-DIRECTED; PROTEIN ENGINEERING; PROTEINS;

EID: 48249098990     PISSN: 1936122X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.biophys.37.032807.125832     Document Type: Review

References (88)

1. Aharoni A, Griffith AD, Tawfik DS. 2005. High-throughput screens and selections of enzyme-encoding genes. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 9:210-16
2. Akanuma S, Kigawa T, Yokoyama S. 2002. Combinatorial mutagenesis to restrict amino acid usage in an enzyme to a reduced set. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:13549-53
3. Alt FW, Blackwell TK, Yancopoulos GD. 1987. Development of the primary antibody repertoire. Science 238:1079-87
4. Arnold FH. 1998. Design by directed evolution. Acc. Chem. Res. 31:125-31
5. Arnold FH. 2001. Combinatorial and computational challenges for biocatalyst design. Nature 409:253-57
6. Bennett MJ, Choe S, Eisenberg D. 1994. Domain swapping: entangling alliances between proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:3127-31
7. Benson DE, Haddy AE, Hellinga HW. 2002. Converting a maltose receptor into a nascent binuclear copper oxygenase by computational design. Biochemistry 41:3262-69
8. Benson DE, Wisz MS, Hellinga HW. 2000. Rational design of nascent metalloenzymes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:6292-97
9. Besenmatter W, Kast P, Hilvert D. 2004. New enzymes from combinatorial library modules. Methods Enzymol. 388:91-102
10. Bittker JA, Le BV, Liu JM, Liu DR. 2004. Directed evolution of protein enzymes using nonhomologous random recombination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:7011-16
11. Bolon DN, Mayo SL. 2001. Enzyme-like proteins by computational design. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:14274-79
12. Bornscheuer UT, Kazlauskas RJ. 2004. Catalytic promiscuity in biocatalysis: using old enzymes to form new bonds and follow new pathways. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 43:6032-40
13. Butterfoss GL, Kuhlman B. 2006. Computer-based design of novel protein structures. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 35:49-65
14. Dahiyat BI, Mayo SL. 1996. Protein design automation. Protein Sci. 5:895-903
15. Dahiyat BI, Mayo SL. 1997. De novo protein design: fully automated sequence selection. Science 278:82-87
16. Davidson AR, Lumb KJ, Sauer RT. 1995. Cooperatively folded proteins in random sequence libraries. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2:856-64
17. Davidson AR, Sauer RT. 1994. Folded proteins occur frequendy in libraries of random amino acid sequences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:2146-50
18. DeClue MS, Baldridge KK, Künzler DE, Kast P, Hilvert D. 2005. Isochorismate pyruvate lyase: a pericyclic reaction mechanism? J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127:15002-3
19. DeGrado WF. 1993. Catalytic molten globules. Nature 365:488-89
20. Dyson HJ, Wright PE. 2005. Intrinsically unstructured proteins and their functions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 6:197-208
21. Georgiou G, Stathopoulos C, Daugherty PS, Nayak AR, Iverson BL, Curtiss R 3rd. 1997. Display of heterologous proteins on the surface of microorganisms: from the screening of combinatorial libraries to live recombinant vaccines. Nat. Biotechnol. 15:29-34
22. Gerlt JA, Babbitt PC, Rayment I. 2005. Divergent evolution in the enolase superfamily: the interplay of mechanism and specificity. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 433:59-70
23. Goodsell DS, Olson AJ. 2000. Structural symmetry and protein function. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 29:105-53
24. Grishin NV. 2001. Fold change in evolution of protein structures. J. Struct. Biol. 134:167-85
25. Hanes J, Plückthun A. 1997. In vitro selection and evolution of functional proteins by using ribosome display. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:4937-42
26. Harbury PB, Plecs JJ, Tidor B, Alber T, Kim PS. 1998. High-resolution protein design with backbone freedom. Science 282:1462-67
27. Hecht MH, Das A, Go A, Bradley LH, Wei Y. 2004. De novo proteins from designed combinatorial libraries. Protein Sci. 13:1711-23
28. Hilvert D. 2000. Critical analysis of antibody catalysis. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 69:751-93
29. James LC, Tawfik DS. 2003. Conformational diversity and protein evolution: a 60-year-old hypothesis revisited. Trends Biochem. Sci. 28:361-68
30. Kamtekar S, Schiffer JM, Xiong H, Babik JM, Hecht MH. 1993. Protein design by binary patterning of polar and nonpolar amino acids. Science 262:1680-85
31. Kaplan J, DeGrado WF. 2004. De novo design of catalytic proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:11566-70
32. Kast P, Asif-Ullah M, Jiang N, Hilvert D. 1996. Exploring the active site of chorismate mutase by combinatorial mutagenesis and selection: the importance of electrostatic catalysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:5043-48
33. Keefe AD, Szostak JW. 2001. Functional proteins from a random-sequence library. Nature 410:715-18
34. Kehoe JW, Kay BK 2005. Filamentous phage display in the new millennium. Chem. Rev. 105:4056-72
35. Kleeb AC, Edalat MH, Gamper M, Haugstetter J, Giger L, et al. 2007. Metabolic engineering of a genetic selection system with tunable stringency. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104:13907-12
36. Kuhlman B, Dantas G, Ireton GC, Varani G, Stoddard BL, Baker D. 2003. Design of a novel globular protein fold with atomic-level accuracy. Science 302:1364-68
37. Künzler DE, Sasso S, Gamper M, Hilvert D, Kast P. 2005. Mechanistic insights into the isochorismate pyruvate lyase activity of the catalytically promiscuous PchB from combinatorial mutagenesis and selection. J. Biol. Chem. 280:32827-34
38. Lin H, Cornish VW. 2002. Screening and selection methods for large-scale analysis of protein function. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 41:4402-25
39. Looger LL, Dwyer MA, Smith JJ, Hellinga HW. 2003. Computational design of receptor and sensor proteins with novel functions. Nature 423:185-90
40. Looger LL, Hellinga HW. 2001. Generalized dead-end elimination algorithms make large-scale protein side-chain structure prediction tractable: implications for protein design and structural genomics. J. Mol. Biol. 307:429-45
41. Luger K, Hommel U, Herold M, Hofsteenge J, Kirschner K. 1989. Correct folding of circularly permuted variants of a beta alpha barrel enzyme in vivo. Science 243:206-10
42. MacBeath G, Kast P, Hilvert D. 1998. A small, thermostable, and monofunctional chorismate mutase from the archaeon Methanococcus jannaschii. Biochemistry 37:10062-73
43. MacBeath G, Kast P, Hilvert D. 1998. Probing enzyme quaternary structure by combinatorial mutagenesis and selection. Protein Sci. 7:1757-67
44. MacBeath G, Kast P, Hilvert D. 1998. Redesigning enzyme topology by directed evolution. Science 279:1958-61
45. Mastrobattista E, Taly V, Chanudet E, Treacy P, Kelly BT, Griffiths AD. 2005. High-throughput screening of enzyme libraries: in vitro evolution of a beta-galactosidase by fluorescence-activated sorting of double emulsions. Chem. Biol. 12:1291-300
46. Neuenschwander M, Butz M, Heintz C, Kast P, Hilvert D. 2007. A simple selection strategy for evolving highly efficient enzymes. Nat. Biotechnol. 25:1145-47
47. Ökvist M, Dey R, Sasso S, Grahn E, Kast P, Krengel U. 2006. 1.6 Å crystal structure of the secreted chorismate mutase from Mycobacterium tuberculosis: novel fold topology revealed. J. Mol. Biol. 357:1483-99
48. Osawa S, Jukes TH, Watanabe K, Muto A. 1992. Recent evidence for evolution of the genetic code. Microbiol. Rev. 56:229-64
49. Ostermeier M, Shim JH, Benkovic SJ. 1999. A combinatorial approach to hybrid enzymes independent of DNA homology. Nat. Biotechnol. 17:1205-9
50. Park H-S, Nam S-H, Lee JK Yoon CN, Mannervik B, et al. 2006. Design and evolution of new catalytic activity with an existing protein scaffold. Science 311:535-38
51. Peisajovich SG, Rockah L, Tawfik DS. 2006. Evolution of new protein topologies through multistep gene rearrangements. Nat. Genet. 38:168-74
52. Pervushin K, Vamvaca K, Vögeli B, Hilvert D. 2007. Structure and dynamics of a molten globular enzyme. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 14:1202-6
53. Pokala N, Handel TM. 2005. Energy functions for protein design: adjustment with protein-protein complex affinities, models for the unfolded state, and negative design of solubility and specificity. J. Mol. Biol. 347:203-27
54. Powell KA, Ramer SW, del Cardayré SB, Stemmer WP, Tobin MB, et al. 2001. Directed evolution and biocatalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 40:3948-59
55. Qian Z, Lutz S. 2005. Improving the catalytic activity of Candida antarctica lipase B by circular permutation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127:13466-67
56. Rajewsky K, Förster I, Cumano A. 1987. Evolutionary and somatic selection of the antibody repertoire in the mouse. Science 238:1088-94
57. Reetz MT. 2006. Directed evolution of enantioselective enzymes as catalysts for organic synthesis. Adv. Catal. 49:1-69
58. Reidhaar-Olson JF, Sauer RT. 1988. Combinatorial cassette mutagenesis as a probe of the informational content of protein sequences. Science 241:53-57
59. Reymond J-L, ed. 2005. Enzyme Assays: High-Throughput Screening, Genetic Selection, and Fingerprinting. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH
60. Riddle DS, Santiago JV, Bray-Hall ST, Doshi N, Grantcharova VP, et al. 1997. Functional rapidly folding proteins from simplified amino acid sequences. Nat. Struct. Biol. 4:805-9
61. Riechmann L, Winter G. 2000. Novel folded protein domains generated by combinatorial shuffling of polypeptide segments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:10068-73
62. Roberts RW, Szostak JW. 1997. RNA-peptide fusions for the in vitro selection of peptides and proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:12297-302
63. Rojas NRL, Kamtekar S, Simons CT, McLean JE, Vogel KM, et al. 1997. De novo heme proteins from designed combinatorial libraries. Protein Sci. 6:2512-24
64. Sarkar I, Hauber I, Hauber J, Buchholz F. 2007. HIV-1 proviral DNA excision using an evolved recombinase. Science 316:1912-15
65. Seelig B, Szostak JW. 2007. Selection and evolution of enzymes from a partially randomized non-catalytic scaffold. Nature 448:828-31
66. Sieber V, Martinez CA, Arnold FH. 2001. Libraries of hybrid proteins from distantly related sequences. Nat. Biotechnol. 19:456-60
67. 8 barrel fold. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:3092-97
68. Stemmer WP. 1994. Rapid evolution of a protein in vitro by DNA shuffling. Nature 370:389-91
69. Süel GM, Lockless SW, Wall MA, Ranganathan R. 2003. Evolutionarily conserved networks of residues mediate allosteric communication in proteins. Nat. Struct. Biol. 10:59-69
70. Lo Surdo P, Walsh MA, Sollazzo M. 2004. A novel ADP- and zinc-binding fold from function-directed in vitro evolution. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 11:382-83
71. Tawfik DS, Griffiths AD. 1998. Man-made cell-like compartments for molecular evolution. Nat. Biotechnol. 16:652-56
72. Taylor SV, Kast P, Hilvert D. 2001. Investigating and engineering enzymes by genetic selection. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 40:3310-35
73. Taylor SV, Walter KU, Kast P, Hilvert D. 2001. Searching sequence space for protein catalysts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:10596-601
74. Toscano MD, Woycechowsky KJ, Hilvert D. 2007. Minimalist active-site redesign: teaching old enzymes new tricks. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 46:3212-36
75. Vamvaca K, Butz M, Walter KU, Taylor SV, Hilvert D. 2005. Simultaneous optimization of enzyme activity and quaternary structure by directed evolution. Protein Sci. 14:2103-14
76. Vamvaca K, Vögeli B, Kast P, Pervushin K, Hilvert D. 2004. An enzymatic molten globule: efficient coupling of folding and catalysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:12860-64
77. van Sint Fiet S, van Beilen JB, Withold B. 2006. Selection of biocatalysts for chemical synthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103:1693-98
78. Voigt CA, Martinez C, Wang Z-G, Mayo SL, Arnold FH. 2002. Protein building blocks preserved by recombination. Nat. Struct. Biol. 9:553-58
79. Walter KU, Vamvaca K, Hilvert D. 2005. An active enzyme constructed from a 9-amino acid alphabet. J. Biol. Chem. 280:37742-46
80. Wei Y, Hecht MH. 2004. Enzyme-like proteins from an unselected library of designed amino acid sequences. Protein Eng. Des. Sel. 17:67-75
81. Wei Y, Kim S, Fela D, Baum J, Hecht MH. 2003. Solution structure of a de novo protein from a designed combinatorial library. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:13270-73
82. Wilson DS, Keefe AD, Szostak JW. 2001. The use of mRNA display to select high-affinity protein-binding peptides. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:3750-55
83. Wilson DS, Szostak JW. 1999. In vitro selection of functional nucleic acids. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 68:611-47
84. Winter G, Milstein C. 1991. Man-made antibodies. Nature 349:293-99
85. Yoshikuni Y, Ferrin TE, Keasling JD. 2006. Designed divergent evolution of enzyme function. Nature 440:1078-82
86. Yuan L, Kurek I, English J, Keenan R. 2005. Laboratory-directed protein evolution. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 69:373-92
87. Zaitseva J, Lu J, Olechoski KL, Lamb AL. 2006. Two crystal structures of the isochorismate pyruvate lyase from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Biol. Chem. 281:33441-49
88. Zanghellini A, Jiang L, Wollacott AM, Cheng G, Meiler J, et al. 2006. New algorithms and an in silico benchmark for computational enzyme design. Protein Sci. 15:2785-94