Cognitive structure, flexibility, and plasticity in human multitasking-an integrative review of dual-task and task-switching research

Psychological Bulletin

Volumn 144, Issue 6, 2018, Pages 557-583

  Koch, Iring ^a   Poljac, Edita ^b   Müller, Hermann ^c   Kiesel, Andrea ^b  

^a RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^c JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Attention; Cognitive control; Dual task; Multitasking; Task switching

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; AGED; ATTENTION; BEHAVIOR; CHILD; COGNITION; HUMAN; PHYSIOLOGY; TASK PERFORMANCE; THEORETICAL MODEL; YOUNG ADULT;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; AGED; ATTENTION; CHILD; COGNITION; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; MULTITASKING BEHAVIOR; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 85043254264     PISSN: 00332909     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/bul0000144     Document Type: Article

References (247)

1. Abrahamse, E., Braem, S., Notebaert, W., & Verguts, T. (2016). Grounding cognitive control in associative learning. Psychological Bulletin, 142, 693-728. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/bul0000047
2. Allen, P. A., Lien, M.-C., Ruthruff, E., & Voss, A. (2014). Multitasking and aging: Do older adults benefit from performing a highly practiced task? Experimental Aging Research, 40, 280-307. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1080/0361073X.2014.896663
3. Allport, D. A., Antonis, B., & Reynolds, P. (1972). On the division of attention: A disproof of the single channel hypothesis. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 24, 225-235. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1080/00335557243000102
4. Allport, D. A., Styles, E. A., & Hsieh, S. (1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C. Umilta & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and Performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 421-452). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Allport, D. A., & Wylie, G. (2000). Task switching, stimulus-response bindings, and negative priming. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 35-70). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Altmann, E. M. (2002). Functional decay of memory for tasks. Psychological Research, 66, 287-297. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-002- 0102-9
7. Altmann, E. M., & Gray, W. D. (2008). An integrated model of cognitive control in task switching. Psychological Review, 115, 602-639. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.115.3.602
8. Anguera, J. A., Boccanfuso, J., Rintoul, J. L., Al-Hashimi, O., Faraji, F., Janowich, J., Gazzaley, A. (2013). Video game training enhances cognitive control in older adults. Nature, 501, 97-101. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/nature12486
9. Arrington, C. M., & Logan, G. D. (2004). The cost of a voluntary task switch. Psychological Science, 15, 610-615. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ j.0956-7976.2004.00728.x
10. Arrington, C. M., & Logan, G. D. (2005). Voluntary task switching: Chasing the elusive homunculus. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 683-702. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1037/0278-7393.31.4.683
11. Arrington, C. M., Logan, G. D., & Schneider, D. W. (2007). Separating cue encoding from target processing in the explicit task-cuing procedure: Are there "true" task switch effects? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 484-502. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.484
12. Badets, A., Koch, I., & Philipp, A. M. (2016). A review of ideomotor approaches to perception, cognition, action, and language: Advancing a cultural recycling hypothesis. Psychological Research, 80, 1-15. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-014-0643-8
13. Barrett, H. C., & Kurzban, R. (2006). Modularity in cognition: Framing the debate. Psychological Review, 113, 628-647. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ 0033-295X.113.3.628
14. Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617-645. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006 .093639
15. Berryhill, M. E., & Hughes, H. C. (2009). On the minimization of task switch costs following long-term training. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71, 503-514. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/APP.71.3.503
16. Beurskens, R., & Bock, O. (2012). Age-related deficits of dual-task walking: A review. Neural Plasticity, 2012, 1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/ 2012/131608
17. Bialystok, E. (2017). The bilingual adaptation: How minds accommodate experience. Psychological Bulletin, 143, 233-262. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1037/bul0000099
18. Boisgontier, M. P., Beets, I. A., Duysens, J., Nieuwboer, A., Krampe, R. T., & Swinnen, S. P. (2013). Age-related differences in attentional cost associated with postural dual tasks: Increased recruitment of generic cognitive resources in older adults. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 37, 1824-1837. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.07 .014
19. Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624-652. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.624
20. Braverman, A., & Meiran, N. (2015). Conflict control in task conflict and response conflict. Psychological Research, 79, 238-248. http://dx.doi .org/10.1007/s00426-014-0565-5
21. Broadbent, D. E. (1958). Perception and communication. London, England: Pergamon Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/10037-000
22. Brown, J. W., Reynolds, J. R., & Braver, T. S. (2007). A computational model of fractionated conflict-control mechanisms in task-switching. Cognitive Psychology, 55, 37-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych .2006.09.005
23. Bugg, J. M., & Braver, T. S. (2016). Proactive control of irrelevant task rules during cued task switching. Psychological Research, 80, 860-876. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-015-0686-5
24. Byrne, M. D., & Anderson, J. R. (2001). Serial modules in parallel: The psychological refractory period and perfect time-sharing. Psychological Review, 108, 847-869. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.847
25. Cepeda, N. J., Kramer, A. F., & Gonzalez de Sather, J. C. (2001). Changes in executive control across the life span: Examination of task-switching performance. Developmental Psychology, 37, 715-730. http://dx.doi .org/10.1037/0012-1649.37.5.715
26. Chiappe, D., Conger, M., Liao, J., Caldwell, J. L., & Vu, K. P. (2013). Improving multi-tasking ability through action videogames. Applied Ergonomics, 44, 278-284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2012.08 .002
27. Declerck, M., Koch, I., & Philipp, A. M. (2015). The minimum requirements of language control: Evidence from sequential predictability effects in language switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41, 377-394. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1037/xlm0000021
28. Declerck, M., & Philipp, A. M. (2015). A review of control processes and their locus in language switching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 1630-1645. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0836-1
29. de Jong, R. (1995). The role of preparation in overlapping-task performance. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 48A, 2-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/ 14640749508401372
30. de Jong, R. (2000). An intention-activation account of residual switch costs. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and Performance XVIII (pp. 357-376). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31. Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193-222. http://dx.doi .org/10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205
32. Dreisbach, G., & Haider, H. (2008). That's what task sets are for: Shielding against irrelevant information. Psychological Research, 72, 355-361. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-007-0131-5
33. Dreisbach, G., & Haider, H. (2009). How task representations guide attention: Further evidence for the shielding function of task sets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 477-486. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0014647
34. Dux, P. E., & Marois, R. (2009). The attentional blink: A review of data and theory. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71, 1683-1700. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/APP.71.8.1683
35. Ellenbogen, R., & Meiran, N. (2008). Working memory involvement in dual-task performance: Evidence from the backward compatibility effect. Memory & Cognition, 36, 968-978. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/MC .36.5.968
36. Ellenbogen, R., & Meiran, N. (2011). Objects and events as determinants of parallel processing in dual tasks: Evidence from the backward compatibility effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 152-167. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0019958
37. Fagot, C. (1994). Chronometric investigations of task switching (Doctoral dissertation). University of California, San Diego, CA.
38. Fischer, R., Gottschalk, C., & Dreisbach, G. (2014). Context-sensitive adjustment of cognitive control in dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 399-416. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0034310
39. Fischer, R., & Plessow, F. (2015). Efficient multitasking: Parallel versus serial processing of multiple tasks. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1366. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01366
40. Forrest, C. L., Monsell, S., & McLaren, I. P. (2014). Is performance in task-cuing experiments mediated by task set selection or associative compound retrieval? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 1002-1024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ a0035981
41. Forstmann, B. U., Brass, M., & Koch, I. (2007). Methodological and empirical issues when dissociating cue-related from task-related processes in the explicit task-cuing procedure. Psychological Research, 71, 393-400. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-005-0040-4
42. Gade, M., Schuch, S., Druey, M., & Koch, I. (2014). Inhibitory control in task switching. In J. Grange & G. Houghton (Eds.), Task switching and cognitive control (pp. 137-159). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199921959.003.0007
43. Giammarco, M., Thomson, S. J., & Watter, S. (2016). Dual-task backward compatibility effects are episodically mediated. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78, 520 -541. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-015- 0998-y
44. Gilbert, S. J., & Shallice, T. (2002). Task switching: A PDP model. Cognitive Psychology, 44, 297-337. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/cogp .2001.0770
45. Gopher, D., Armony, L., & Greenshpan, Y. (2000). Switching tasks and attention policies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 308-339. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.129.3.308
46. Goschke, T. (2000). Intentional reconfiguration and involuntary persistence in task set switching. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 331-355). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
47. Goschke, T. (2013). Volition in action: Intentions, control dilemmas and the dynamic regulation of intentional control. In W. Prinz, A. Beisert, & A. Herwig (Eds.), Action science: Foundations of an emerging discipline (pp. 408-434). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.7551/ mitpress/9780262018555.003.0016
48. Göthe, K., Oberauer, K., & Kliegl, R. (2016). Eliminating dual-task costs by minimizing crosstalk between tasks: The role of modality and feature pairings. Cognition, 150, 92-108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition .2016.02.003
49. Gotler, A., Meiran, N., & Tzelgov, J. (2003). Nonintentional task set activation: Evidence from implicit task sequence learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 890-896. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03196549
50. Gottsdanker, R. (1979). A psychological refractory period or an unprepared period. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 208-215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.5.2.208
51. Grange, J. A., & Houghton, G. (2014). Models of cognitive control in task switching. In J. A. Grange & G. Houghton (Eds.), Task switching and cognitive control (pp. 160-199). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199921959.003.0008
52. Grange, J. A., Kowalczyk, A. W., & O'Loughlin, R. (2017). The effect of episodic retrieval on inhibition in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43, 1568-1583. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000411
53. Green, C. S., & Bavelier, D. (2003). Action video game modifies visual selective attention. Nature, 423, 534-537. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ nature01647
54. Green, C. S., & Bavelier, D. (2012). Learning, attentional control, and action video games. Current Biology, 22, R197-R206. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cub.2012.02.012
55. Greenwald, A. G. (1970). Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control: With special reference to the ideo-motor mechanism. Psychological Review, 77, 73-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0028689
56. Greenwald, A. G., & Shulman, H. G. (1973). On doing two things at once. II. Elimination of the psychological refractory period effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 101, 70 -76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ h0035451
57. Halvorson, K. M., Ebner, H., & Hazeltine, E. (2013). Investigating perfect timesharing: The relationship between IM-compatible tasks and dualtask performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 413-432. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0029475
58. Halvorson, K. M., & Hazeltine, E. (2015). Do small dual-task costs reflect ideomotor compatibility or the absence of crosstalk? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 1403-1409. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015- 0813-8
59. Hartley, A. A., Seaman, B., & Maquestiaux, F. (2015). Ideomotorcompatible tasks partially escape dual-task interference in both young and elderly adults. Psychology and Aging, 30, 36-45. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1037/pag0000015
60. Hazeltine, E., & Ruthruff, E. (2006). Modality pairing effects and the response selection bottleneck. Psychological Research, 70, 504-513. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-005-0017-3
61. Hazeltine, E., Ruthruff, E., & Remington, R. W. (2006). The role of input and output modality pairings in dual-task performance: Evidence for content-dependent central interference. Cognitive Psychology, 52, 291-345. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.11.001
62. Hazeltine, E., Teague, D., & Ivry, R. B. (2002). Simultaneous dual-task performance reveals parallel response selection after practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 527-545. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.28.3.527
63. Heuer, H., Schmidtke, V., & Kleinsorge, T. (2001). Implicit learning of sequences of tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 967-983. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278- 7393.27.4.967
64. Hirsch, P., Nolden, S., & Koch, I. (2017). Higher-order cognitive control in dual tasks: Evidence from task-pair switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43, 569-580. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000309
65. Hirsch, P., Nolden, S., Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2017). Hierarchical task organization in dual tasks: Evidence for higher-level task representations. Psychological Research, online first. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-017-0851-0
66. Hirsch, P., Schwarzkopp, T., Declerck, M., Reese, S., & Koch, I. (2016). Age-related differences in task switching and task preparation: Exploring the role of task-set competition. Acta Psychologica, 170, 66-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.06.008
67. Hoffmann, J., Kiesel, A., & Sebald, A. (2003). Task switches under go/no-go conditions and the decomposition of switch costs. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 15, 101-128. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1080/09541440303602
68. Hommel, B. (1998). Automatic stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1368-1384. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523 .24.5.1368
69. Hommel, B. (2009). Action control according to TEC (theory of event coding). Psychological Research, 73, 512-526. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1007/s00426-009-0234-2
70. Hommel, B., & Eglau, B. (2002). Control of stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. Psychological Research, 66, 260-273. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-002-0100-y
71. Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849-878. http://dx.doi .org/10.1017/S0140525X01000103
72. Horoufchin, H., Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2011). The dissipating taskrepetition benefit in cued task switching: Task-set decay or temporal distinctiveness? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 455-472. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0020557
73. Hsu, Y.-F., & Waszak, F. (2012). Stimulus-classification traces are dominant in response learning. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 86, 262-268. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.10.002
74. Huestegge, L., & Koch, I. (2010). Cross-modal action selection: Evidence from dual-task compatibility. Memory & Cognition, 38, 493-501. http:// dx.doi.org/10.3758/MC.38.4.493
75. Huestegge, L., & Koch, I. (2013). Constraints in task-set control: Modality dominance patterns among effector systems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 633- 637. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1037/a0030156
76. Huestegge, L., Pieczykolan, A., & Koch, I. (2014). Talking while looking: On the encapsulation of output system representations. Cognitive Psychology, 73, 72-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2014.06.001
77. Jaeggi, S. M., Buschkuehl, M., Jonides, J., & Perrig, W. J. (2008). Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA of the United States of America, 105, 6829-6833. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0801268105
78. Janczyk, M. (2016). Sequential modulation of backward crosstalk and task-shielding in dual-tasking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42, 631-647. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1037/xhp0000170
79. Janczyk, M., Pfister, R., Hommel, B., & Kunde, W. (2014). Who is talking in backward crosstalk? Disentangling response-from goal-conflict in dual-task performance. Cognition, 132, 30-43. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1016/j.cognition.2014.03.001
80. Jersild, A. T. (1927). Mental set and shift. Archives of Psychology, whole no. 89. Retrieved from https://ia800209.us.archive.org/25/items/ mentalsetshift00jers/mentalsetshift00jers.pdf
81. Jiang, Y., Saxe, R., & Kanwisher, N. (2004). Functional magnetic resonance imaging provides new constraints on theories of the psychological refractory period. Psychological Science, 15, 390-396. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00690.x
82. Jolicoeur, P. (1999). Dual-task interference and visual encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 596-616. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.25.3.596
83. Jolicoeur, P., & Dell'Acqua, R. (1998). The demonstration of short-term consolidation. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 138-202. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1006/cogp.1998.0684
84. Jolicoeur, P., Tombu, M., Oriet, C., & Stevanovski, B. (2002). From perception to action: Making the connection. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.), Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention and performance XIX (pp. 558-586). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
85. Jost, K., De Baene, W., Koch, I., & Brass, M. (2013). A review of the role of cue processing in task switching. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 221, 5-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000125
86. Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Inc.
87. Karbach, J., & Kray, J. (2009). How useful is executive control training? Age differences in near and far transfer of task-switching training. Developmental Science, 12, 978-990. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 7687.2009.00846.x
88. Karbach, J., & Schubert, T. (2013). Training-induced cognitive and neural plasticity. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 48. http://dx.doi.org/10 .3389/fnhum.2013.00048
89. Karbach, J., & Verhaeghen, P. (2014). Making working memory work: A meta-analysis of executive-control and working memory training in older adults. Psychological Science, 25, 2027-2037. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1177/0956797614548725
90. Karlin, L., & Kestenbaum, R. (1968). Effects of number of alternatives on the psychological refractory period. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 167-178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/ 14640746808400145
91. Kiesel, A., Kunde, W., & Hoffmann, J. (2006). Evidence for task-specific resolution of response conflict. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 800-806. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03194000
92. Kiesel, A., Steinhauser, M., Wendt, M., Falkenstein, M., Jost, K., Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2010). Control and interference in task switching-A review. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 849 - 874. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1037/a0019842
93. Kiesel, A., Wendt, M., & Peters, A. (2007). Task switching: On the origin of response congruency effects. Psychological Research, 71, 117-125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-005-0004-8
94. Koch, I. (2001). Automatic and intentional activation of task sets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1474-1486. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.27.6.1474
95. Koch, I. (2003). The role of external cues for endogenous advance reconfiguration in task switching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 488-492. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03196511
96. Koch, I. (2005). Sequential task predictability in task switching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 107-112. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/ BF03196354
97. Koch, I. (2009). The role of crosstalk in dual-task performance: Evidence from manipulating response-code overlap. Psychological Research, 73, 417-424. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-008-0152-8
98. Koch, I., & Allport, A. (2006). Cue-based preparation and stimulus-based priming of tasks in task switching. Memory & Cognition, 34, 433-444. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03193420
99. Koch, I., & Brass, M. (2013). Task switching-Maturation of a paradigm. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 221, 1-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/2151- 2604/a000124
100. Koch, I., Gade, M., Schuch, S., & Philipp, A. M. (2010). The role of inhibition in task switching: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 1-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.1.1
101. Koch, I., & Jolicoeur, P. (2007). Orthogonal cross-task compatibility: Abstract spatial coding in dual tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 45-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03194026
102. Koch, I., Lawo, V., Fels, J., & Vorländer, M. (2011). Switching in the cocktail party: Exploring intentional control of auditory selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 1140-1147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0022189
103. Koch, I., Philipp, A. M., & Gade, M. (2006). Chunking in task sequences modulates task inhibition. Psychological Science, 17, 346-350. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01709.x
104. Koch, I., & Prinz, W. (2002). Process interference and code overlap in dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 192-201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ 0096-1523.28.1.192
105. Koch, I., Prinz, W., & Allport, A. (2005). Involuntary retrieval in alphabetarithmetic tasks: Task-mixing and task-switching costs. Psychological Research, 69, 252-261. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-004-0180-y
106. Koch, I., Ruge, H., Brass, M., Rubin, O., Meiran, N., & Prinz, W. (2003). Equivalence of cognitive processes in brain imaging and behavioral studies: Evidence from task switching. NeuroImage, 20, 572-577. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00206-4
107. Koch, I., & Rumiati, R. I. (2006). Task-set inertia and memoryconsolidation bottleneck in dual tasks. Psychological Research, 70, 448-458. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-005-0020-8
108. Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility-A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253-270. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ 0033-295X.97.2.253
109. Kramer, A. F., & Madden, D. (2008). Attention. In F. I. M. Craik & T. A. Salthouse (Eds.), The handbook of aging and cognition (3rd ed., pp. 189-249). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
110. Krampe, R. T., Schaefer, S., Lindenberger, U., & Baltes, P. B. (2011). Lifespan changes in multi-tasking: Concurrent walking and memory search in children, young, and older adults. Gait & Posture, 33, 401-405. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.12.012
111. Kray, J., & Ferdinand, N. K. (2014). Task switching and aging. In J. Grange & G. Houghton (Eds.), Task switching and cognitive control (pp. 350-371). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199921959.003.0014
112. Kray, J., Karbach, J., Haenig, S., & Freitag, C. (2012). Can task-switching training enhance executive control functioning in children with attention deficit/-hyperactivity disorder? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 180. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2011.00180
113. Kray, J., & Lindenberger, U. (2000). Adult age differences in task switching. Psychology and Aging, 15, 126-147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ 0882-7974.15.1.126
114. Kuhns, D., Lien, M.-C., & Ruthruff, E. (2007). Proactive versus reactive task-set inhibition: Evidence from flanker compatibility effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 977-983. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/ BF03194131
115. Kunde, W., Elsner, K., & Kiesel, A. (2007). No anticipation-no action: The role of anticipation in action and perception. Cognitive Processing, 8, 71-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10339-007-0162-2
116. Lachter, J., Forster, K. I., & Ruthruff, E. (2004). Forty-five years after Broadbent (1958): Still no identification without attention. Psychological Review, 111, 880-913. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.4 .880
117. Lawo, V., Philipp, A. M., Schuch, S., & Koch, I. (2012). The role of task preparation and task inhibition in age-related task-switching deficits. Psychology and Aging, 27, 1130 -1137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ a0027455
118. Lehle, C., & Hübner, R. (2009). Strategic capacity sharing between two tasks: Evidence from tasks with the same and with different task sets. Psychological Research, 73, 707-726. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s00426-008-0162-6
119. Levy, J., & Pashler, H. (2001). Is dual-task slowing instruction dependent? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 862-869. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.27.4.862
120. Liefooghe, B., Wenke, D., & De Houwer, J. (2012). Instruction-based task-rule congruency effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 1325-1335. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1037/a0028148
121. Lien, M.-C., & Proctor, R. W. (2000). Multiple spatial correspondence effects on dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1260-1280. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1037/0096-1523.26.4.1260
122. Lien, M.-C., & Proctor, R. W. (2002). Stimulus-response compatibility and psychological refractory period effects: Implications for response selection. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 212-238. http://dx.doi.org/10 .3758/BF03196277
123. Lien, M.-C., Proctor, R. W., & Allen, P. A. (2002). Ideomotor compatibility in the psychological refractory period effect: 29 years of oversimplification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 396-409. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.28.2 .396
124. Lien, M.-C., & Ruthruff, E. (2004). Task switching in a hierarchical task structure: Evidence for the fragility of the task repetition benefit. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 697-713. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.30.3.697
125. Lien, M.-C., Ruthruff, E., Cornett, L., Goodin, Z., & Allen, P. A. (2008). On the nonautomaticity of visual word processing: Electrophysiological evidence that word processing requires central attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 751-773. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.34.3.751
126. Lien, M.-C., Ruthruff, E., Hsieh, S., & Yu, Y.-T. (2007). Parallel central processing between tasks: Evidence from lateralized readiness potentials. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 133-141. http://dx.doi.org/10 .3758/BF03194040
127. Lien, M.-C., Ruthruff, E., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (2005). On the limits of advance preparation for a task switch: Do people prepare all the task some of the time or some of the task all the time? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 299-315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.31.2.299
128. Liepelt, R., Fischer, R., Frensch, A. P., & Schubert, T. (2012). Practicerelated reduction of dual-task costs under conditions of a manual-foot response combination. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23, 29-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2011.448025
129. Liepelt, R., Strobach, T., Frensch, P., & Schubert, T. (2011). Improved intertask coordination after extensive dual-task practice. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64A, 1251-1272. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1080/17470218.2010.543284
130. Lindsen, J. P., & de Jong, R. (2010). Distinguishing between the partialmapping preparation hypothesis and the failure-to-engage hypothesis of residual switch costs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 1207-1226. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ a0020362
131. Logan, G. D., & Bundesen, C. (2003). Clever homunculus: Is there an endogenous act of control in the explicit task-cuing procedure? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 575-599. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.29.3.575
132. Logan, G. D., & Delheimer, J. A. (2001). Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: II. Episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 668-685. http://dx .doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.27.3.668
133. Logan, G. D., & Gordon, R. D. (2001). Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations. Psychological Review, 108, 393-434. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.2.393
134. Logan, G. D., & Schulkind, M. D. (2000). Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: I. Semantic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1072-1090. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.26.3.1072
135. Longman, C. S., Lavric, A., Munteanu, C., & Monsell, S. (2014). Attentional inertia and delayed orienting of spatial attention in task-switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 1580-1602. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0036552
136. Lövdén, M., Bäckman, L., Lindenberger, U., Schaefer, S., & Schmiedek, F. (2010). A theoretical framework for the study of adult cognitive plasticity. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 659-676. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ a0020080
137. Luria, R., & Meiran, N. (2003). Online order control in the psychological refractory period paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 556-574. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1037/0096-1523.29.3.556
138. Lussier, M., Gagnon, C., & Bherer, L. (2012). An investigation of response and stimulus modality transfer effects after dual-task training in younger and older. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 129. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00129
139. Maquestiaux, F., Hartley, A. A., & Bertsch, J. (2004). Can practice overcome age-related differences in the psychological refractory period effect? Psychology and Aging, 19, 649-667. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ 0882-7974.19.4.649
140. Maquestiaux, F., Laguë-Beauvais, M., Ruthruff, E., & Bherer, L. (2008). Bypassing the central bottleneck after single-task practice in the psychological refractory period paradigm: Evidence for task automatization and greedy resource recruitment. Memory & Cognition, 36, 1262-1282. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.7.1262
141. Marois, R., & Ivanoff, J. (2005). Capacity limits of information processing in the brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 296-305. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.tics.2005.04.010
142. Mayr, U., & Keele, S. W. (2000). Changing internal constraints on action: The role of backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 4-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.129.1.4
143. Mayr, U., & Kliegl, R. (2000). Task-set switching and long-term memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1124-1140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.26.5 .1124
144. Mayr, U., & Kliegl, R. (2003). Differential effects of cue changes and task changes on task-set selection costs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 362-372. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1037/0278-7393.29.3.362
145. McCann, R. S., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Locus of the single-channel bottleneck in dual-task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 471-484. http://dx.doi .org/10.1037/0096-1523.18.2.471
146. Meiran, N. (1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1423-1442. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.22 .6.1423
147. Meiran, N. (2000). Modeling cognitive control in task-switching. Psychological Research, 63, 234 -249. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s004269900004
148. Meiran, N., Chorev, Z., & Sapir, A. (2000). Component processes in task switching. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 211-253. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1006/cogp.2000.0736
149. Meiran, N., & Kessler, Y. (2008). The task rule congruency effect in task switching reflects activated long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 137-157. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.34.1.137
150. Meiran, N., Kessler, Y., & Adi-Japha, E. (2008). Control by action representation and input selection (CARIS): A theoretical framework for task switching. Psychological Research, 72, 473-500. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1007/s00426-008-0136-8
151. Meuter, R. F., & Allport, A. (1999). Bilingual language switching in naming: Asymmetrical costs of language selection. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 25-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1998.2602
152. Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1997). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Pt. 1. Basic mechanisms. Psychological Review, 104, 3-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ 0033-295X.104.1.3
153. Miller, J. (2006). Backward crosstalk effects in psychological refractory period paradigms: Effects of second-task response types on first-task response latencies. Psychological Research, 70, 484-493. http://dx.doi .org/10.1007/s00426-005-0011-9
154. Miller, J., & Alderton, M. (2006). Backward response-level crosstalk in the psychological refractory period paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 149-165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.32.1.149
155. Miller, J., & Ulrich, R. (2008). Bimanual response grouping in dual-task paradigms. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 999-1019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17470210701434540
156. Miller, J., Ulrich, R., & Rolke, B. (2009). On the optimality of serial and parallel processing in the psychological refractory period paradigm: Effects of the distribution of stimulus onset asynchronies. Cognitive Psychology, 58, 273-310. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.08 .003
157. Minear, M., & Shah, P. (2008). Training and transfer effects in task switching. Memory & Cognition, 36, 1470-1483. http://dx.doi.org/10 .3758/MC.336.8.1470
158. Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex "frontal lobe" tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/ cogp.1999.0734
159. Monsell, S. (1996). Control of mental processes. In V. Bruce (Ed.), Unsolved mysteries of the mind (pp. 93-148). Hove, England: Erlbaum.
160. Monsell, S. (2003). Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 134-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00028-7
161. Monsell, S., & Mizon, G. A. (2006). Can the task-cuing paradigm measure an endogenous task-set reconfiguration process? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 493-516. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.32.3.493
162. Monsell, S., Yeung, N., & Azuma, R. (2000). Reconfiguration of task-set: Is it easier to switch to the weaker task? Psychological Research, 63, 250-264. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s004269900005
163. Montero-Odasso, M., Verghese, J., Beauchet, O., & Hausdorff, J. M. (2012). Gait and cognition: A complementary approach to understanding brain function and the risk of falling. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 60, 2127-2136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012 .04209.x
164. Moutsopoulou, K., & Waszak, F. (2013). Durability of classification and action learning: Differences revealed using ex-Gaussian distribution analysis. Experimental Brain Research, 226, 373-382. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/s00221-013-3445-0
165. Navon, D., & Gopher, D. (1979). On the economy of the human-processing system. Psychological Review, 86, 214-255. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ 0033-295X.86.3.214
166. Navon, D., & Miller, J. (1987). Role of outcome conflict in dual-task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 435-448. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.13 .3.435
167. Navon, D., & Miller, J. (2002). Queuing or sharing? A critical evaluation of the single-bottleneck notion. Cognitive Psychology, 44, 193-251. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/cogp.2001.0767
168. Oberauer, K., Souza, A. S., Druey, M. D., & Gade, M. (2013). Analogous mechanisms of selection and updating in declarative and procedural working memory: Experiments and a computational model. Cognitive Psychology, 66, 157-211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.11 .001
169. Paap, K. R., & Greenberg, Z. I. (2013). There is no coherent evidence for a bilingual advantage in executive processing. Cognitive Psychology, 66, 232-258. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.12.002
170. Pashler, H. (1984). Processing stages in overlapping tasks: Evidence for a central bottleneck. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 358-377. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096- 1523.10.3.358
171. Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 220-244. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033- 2909.116.2.220
172. Pashler, H. (1998). The psychology of attention. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
173. Pashler, H. (2000). Task switching and multitask performance. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 277-307). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
174. Pashler, H., & Johnston, J. C. (1989). Chronometric evidence for central postponement in temporally overlapping tasks. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 41A, 19-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14640748908402351
175. Pfeuffer, C. U., Moutsopoulou, K., Pfister, R., Waszak, F., & Kiesel, A. (2017). The power of words: On item-specific stimulus-response associations formed in the absence of action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43, 328-347. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000317
176. Philipp, A. M., Jolicoeur, P., Falkenstein, M., & Koch, I. (2007). Response selection and response execution in task switching: Evidence from a go-signal paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 1062-1075. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ 0278-7393.33.6.1062
177. Pichierri, G., Wolf, P., Murer, K., & de Bruin, E. D. (2011). Cognitive and cognitive-motor interventions affecting physical functioning: A systematic review. BMC Geriatrics, 11, 29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471- 2318-11-29
178. Poljac, E., & Bekkering, H. (2012). A review of intentional and cognitive control in autism. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 436. http://dx.doi.org/10 .3389/fpsyg.2012.00436
179. Poljac, E., de Haan, A., & van Galen, G. P. V. (2006). Current task activation predicts general effects of advance preparation in task switching. Experimental Psychology, 53, 260-267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/ 1618-3169.53.4.260
180. Poljac, E., Koch, I., & Bekkering, H. (2009). Dissociating restart cost and mixing cost in task switching. Psychological Research, 73, 407-416. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-008-0151-9
181. Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., & Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 849-860. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.18.3.849
182. Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207-231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.124.2.207
183. Rosenbaum, D. A. (2009). Human motor control (2nd ed.). San Diego, CA: Academic Press/Elsevier.
184. Rubinstein, J. S., Meyer, D. E., & Evans, J. E. (2001). Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 763-797. http://dx.doi .org/10.1037/0096-1523.27.4.763
185. Ruge, H., Jamadar, S., Zimmermann, U., & Karayanidis, F. (2013). The many faces of preparatory control in task switching: Reviewing a decade of fMRI research. Human Brain Mapping, 34, 12-35. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1002/hbm.21420
186. Ruiz Fernández, S., Leonhard, T., Rolke, B., & Ulrich, R. (2011). Processing two tasks with varying task order: Central stage duration influences central processing order. Acta Psychologica, 137, 10-17. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.01.016
187. Ruthruff, E., Johnston, J. C., Van Selst, M., Whitsell, S., & Remington, R. (2003). Vanishing dual-task interference after practice: Has the bottleneck been eliminated or is it merely latent? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 280-289. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.29.2.280
188. Ruthruff, E., Pashler, H. E., & Klaassen, A. (2001). Processing bottlenecks in dual-task performance: Structural limitation or strategic postponement? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 73-80. http://dx.doi.org/10 .3758/BF03196141
189. Ruthruff, E., Van Selst, M., Johnston, J. C., & Remington, R. (2006). How does practice reduce dual-task interference: Integration, automatization, or just stage-shortening? Psychological Research, 70, 125-142. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-004-0192-7
190. Sakai, K. (2008). Task set and prefrontal cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 31, 219 -245. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.31 .060407.125642
191. Sanders, A. G. (1998). Elements of human performance: Reaction processes and attention in human skill. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
192. Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. D. (2011). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis (5th ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
193. Schneider, D. W. (2015). Isolating a mediated route for response congruency effects in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41, 235-245. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1037/xlm0000049
194. Schneider, D. W., & Logan, G. D. (2005). Modeling task switching without switching tasks: A short-term priming account of explicitly cued performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 343-367. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.134.3.343
195. Schneider, D. W., & Logan, G. D. (2014). Tasks, task sets, and the mapping between them. In J. A. Grange & G. Houghton (Eds.), Task switching and cognitive control (pp. 27-44). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199921959.003.0002
196. Schubert, T. (2008). The central attentional limitation and executive control. Frontiers in Bioscience, 13, 3569-3580. http://dx.doi.org/10.2741/ 2950
197. Schubert, T., Strobach, T., & Karbach, J. (2014). New directions in cognitive training: On methods, transfer, and application. Psychological Research, 78, 749-755. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-014-0619-8
198. Schuch, S., & Koch, I. (2003). The role of response selection for inhibition of task sets in task shifting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 92-105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ 0096-1523.29.1.92
199. Schuch, S., & Koch, I. (2004). The costs of changing the representation of action: Response repetition and response-response compatibility in dual tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 566-582. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.30.3 .566
200. Schultz, P. W., & Searleman, A. (2002). Rigidity of thought and behavior: 100 years of research. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 128, 165-207.
201. Schumacher, E. H., Seymour, T. L., Glass, J. M., Fencsik, D. E., Lauber, E. J., Kieras, D. E., & Meyer, D. E. (2001). Virtually perfect time sharing in dual-task performance: Uncorking the central cognitive bottleneck. Psychological Science, 12, 101-108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ 1467-9280.00318
202. Sexton, N. J., & Cooper, R. P. (2017). Task inhibition, conflict, and the n-2 repetition cost: A combined computational and empirical approach. Cognitive Psychology, 94, 1-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych .2017.01.003
203. Shin, Y. K., Proctor, R. W., & Capaldi, E. J. (2010). A review of contemporary ideomotor theory. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 943-974. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0020541
204. Shipstead, Z., Redick, T. S., & Engle, R. W. (2012). Is working memory training effective? Psychological Bulletin, 138, 628-654. http://dx.doi .org/10.1037/a0027473
205. Sigman, M., & Dehaene, S. (2006). Dynamics of the central bottleneck: Dual-task and task uncertainty. PLoS Biology, 4, e220. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040220
206. Spector, A., & Biederman, I. (1976). Mental set and mental shift revisited. The American Journal of Psychology, 89, 669-679. http://dx.doi.org/10 .2307/1421465
207. Spelke, E., Hirst, W., & Neisser, U. (1976). Skills of divided attention. Cognition, 4, 215-230. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(76)90018-4
208. Stelzel, C., Schumacher, E. H., Schubert, T., & D'Esposito, M. (2006). The neural effect of stimulus-response modality compatibility on dual-task performance: An fMRI study. Psychological Research, 70, 514-525. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-005-0013-7
209. Stephan, D. N., & Koch, I. (2010). Central cross-talk in task switching: Evidence from manipulating input-output modality compatibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1075-1081. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0019695
210. Stephan, D. N., & Koch, I. (2011). The role of input-output modality compatibility in task switching. Psychological Research, 75, 491-498. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-011-0353-4
211. Stephan, D. N., & Koch, I. (2015). Tactile stimuli increase effects of modality compatibility in task switching. Experimental Psychology, 62, 276-284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000291
212. Stephan, D. N., & Koch, I. (2016). Modality-specific effects on crosstalk in task switching: Evidence from modality compatibility using bimodal stimulation. Psychological Research, 80, 935-943. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1007/s00426-015-0700-y
213. Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method. In W. G. Koster (Ed.), Acta Psychologica, 30, 276- 315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(69)90055-9
214. Sternberg, S. (2011). Modular processes in mind and brain. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 28, 156 -208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02643294 .2011.557231
215. Stoet, G., & Snyder, L. H. (2007). Extensive practice does not eliminate human switch costs. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 7, 192-197. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/CABN.7.3.192
216. Strobach, T., Frensch, P. A., & Schubert, T. (2012). Video game practice optimizes executive control skills in dual-task and task switching situations. Acta Psychologica, 140, 13-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j .actpsy.2012.02.001
217. Strobach, T., & Karbach, J. (2016). Cognitive training-An overview of features and applications. New York, NY: Springer. http://dx .doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42662-4
218. Strobach, T., Liepelt, R., Schubert, T., & Kiesel, A. (2012). Task switching: Effects of practice on switch and mixing costs. Psychological Research, 76, 74-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-011-0323-x
219. Strobach, T., Salminen, T., Karbach, J., & Schubert, T. (2014). Practicerelated optimization and transfer of executive functions: A general review and a specific realization of their mechanisms in dual tasks. Psychological Research, 78, 836 - 851. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s00426-014-0563-7
220. Strobach, T., & Schubert, T. (2017a). Mechanisms of practice-related reductions of dual-task interference with simple tasks: Data and theory. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 13, 28-41. http://dx.doi.org/10 .5709/acp-0204-7
221. Strobach, T., & Schubert, T. (2017b). No evidence for task automatization after dual-task training in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 32, 28-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pag0000144
222. Sudevan, P., & Taylor, D. A. (1987). The cuing and priming of cognitive operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 89-103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.13 .1.89
223. Szameitat, A. J., Lepsien, J., von Cramon, D. Y., Sterr, A., & Schubert, T. (2006). Task-order coordination in dual-task performance and the lateral prefrontal cortex: An event-related fMRI study. Psychological Research, 70, 541-552. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-005-0015-5
224. Szameitat, A. J., Schubert, T., Müller, K., & Von Cramon, D. Y. (2002). Localization of executive functions in dual-task performance with fMRI. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 1184-1199. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1162/089892902760807195
225. Tamber-Rosenau, B. J., Dux, P. E., Tombu, M. N., Asplund, C. L., & Marois, R. (2013). Amodal processing in human prefrontal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 33, 11573-11587. http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ JNEUROSCI.4601-12.2013
226. Telford, C. W. (1931). The refractory phase of voluntary and associative responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 14, 1-36. http://dx.doi .org/10.1037/h0073262
227. Töllner, T., Strobach, T., Schubert, T., & Müller, H. J. (2012). The effect of task order predictability in audio-visual dual task performance: Just a central capacity limitation? Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 6, 75. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2012.00075
228. Tombu, M., & Jolicoeur, P. (2003). A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 3-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096- 1523.29.1.3
229. Vandierendonck, A., Liefooghe, B., & Verbruggen, F. (2010). Task switching: Interplay of reconfiguration and interference control. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 601-626. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0019791
230. Van Selst, M., Ruthruff, E., & Johnston, J. C. (1999). Can practice eliminate the psychological refractory period effect? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1268-1283. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.25.5.1268
231. Verhaeghen, P. (2011). Aging and executive control: Reports of a demise greatly exaggerated. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 174-180. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963721411408772
232. Verhaeghen, P., Steitz, D. W., Sliwinski, M. J., & Cerella, J. (2003). Aging and dual-task performance: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 18, 443-460. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.18.3.443
233. von Bastian, C. C., Souza, A. S., & Gade, M. (2016). No evidence for bilingual cognitive advantages: A test of four hypotheses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145, 246-258. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1037/xge0000120
234. Wang, X., Pi, Y., Chen, P., Liu, Y., Wang, R., & Chan, C. (2015). Cognitive motor interference for preventing falls in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Age and Ageing, 44, 205-212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afu175
235. Wasylyshyn, C., Verhaeghen, P., & Sliwinski, M. J. (2011). Aging and task switching: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 26, 15-20. http://dx .doi.org/10.1037/a0020912
236. Waszak, F., Hommel, B., & Allport, A. (2003). Task-switching and longterm priming: Role of episodic stimulus-task bindings in task-shift costs. Cognitive Psychology, 46, 361-413. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0010- 0285(02)00520-0
237. Watkins, E. R. (2008). Constructive and unconstructive repetitive thought. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 163-206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033- 2909.134.2.163
238. Welford, A. T. (1952). The 'psychological refractory period' and the timing of high-speeded performance-A review and a theory. British Journal of Psychology, 43, 2-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295 .1952.tb00322.x
239. Wendt, M., & Kiesel, A. (2008). The impact of stimulus-specific practice and task instructions on response congruency effects between tasks. Psychological Research, 72, 425- 432. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s00426-007-0117-3
240. Wendt, M., Kiesel, A., Mathew, H., Luna-Rodriguez, A., & Jacobsen, T. (2013). Irrelevant stimulus processing when switching between tasks. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 221, 41-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/2151- 2604/a000129
241. Wendt, M., Luna-Rodriguez, A., Kiesel, A., & Jacobsen, T. (2013). Conflict adjustment devoid of perceptual selection. Acta Psychologica, 144, 31-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.04.019
242. Wickens, C. D. (1984). Processing resources in attention. In R. Parasuraman & D. R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 63-102). New York, NY: Academic Press.
243. Wickens, C. D. (2002). Multiple resources and performance prediction. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 3, 159-177. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1080/14639220210123806
244. Wollesen, B., & Voelcker-Rehage, C. (2014). Training effects on motor- cognitive dual-task performance in older adults. European Review of Aging and Physical Activity, 11, 5-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11556- 013-0122-z
245. Woollacott, M., & Shumway-Cook, A. (2002). Attention and the control of posture and gait: A review of an emerging area of research. Gait & Posture, 16, 1-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6362(01)00156-4
246. Yeung, N. (2010). Bottom-up influences on voluntary task switching: The elusive homunculus escapes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 348-362. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1037/a0017894
247. Zinke, K., Einert, M., Pfennig, L., & Kliegel, M. (2012). Plasticity of executive control through task switching training in adolescents. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 41. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum .2012.00041