The effect of episodic retrieval on inhibition in task switching

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 43, Issue 8, 2017, Pages 1568-1583

  Grange, James A ^a   Kowalczyk, Agnieszka W ^a   O'Loughlin, Rory ^a  

^a KEELE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cognitive control; Episodic retrieval; Inhibition; N 2 repetition cost; Task switching

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ASSOCIATION; EPISODIC MEMORY; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RECALL; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; CUES; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MEMORY, EPISODIC; MENTAL RECALL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 85016731332     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: 19391277     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000411     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Altmann, E. M. (2011). Testing probability matching and episodic retrieval accounts of response repetition effects in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 935-951.
2. Altmann, E. M., & Gray, W. D. (2008). An integrated model of cognitive control in task switching. Psychological Review, 115, 602-639.
3. Arbuthnott, K. D. (2005). The influence of cue type on backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 1030-1042.
4. Bakeman, R. (2005). Recommended effect size statistics for repeated measures designs. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 379-384. http://dx .doi.org/10.3758/BF03192707
5. Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
6. Brown, G. D. A., Neath, I., & Chater, N. (2007). A temporal ratio model of memory. Psychological Review, 114, 539-576.
7. Cumming, G. (2012). Understanding the new statistics: Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and meta-analysis. New York, NY: Routledge.
8. Fales, C. L., Vanek, Z. F., & Knowlton, B. J. (2006). Backward inhibition in Parkinson's disease. Neuropsychologia, 44, 1041-1049.
9. Gade, M., & Koch, I. (2005). Linking inhibition to activation in the control of task sequences. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 530-534.
10. Gade, M., & Koch, I. (2014). Cue type affects preparatory influences on task inhibition. Acta Psychologica, 148, 12-18.
11. Gade, M., Souza, A. S., Druey, M. D., & Oberauer, K. (in press). Analogous selection processes in declarative and procedural working memory: N-2 list-repetition and task-repetition costs. Memory & Cognition. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-016-0645-4
12. Gallistel, C. R. (2009). The importance of proving the null. Psychological Review, 116, 439-453.
13. Gordon, M., & Lumley, T. (2016). Package "forestplot" [Computer software manual]. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ forestplot
14. Goschke, T. (2000). Intentional reconfiguration and involuntary persistence in task set switching. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 331-356). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Grange, J. A. (2016). Temporal distinctiveness in task switching: Assessing the mixture distribution assumption. Frontiers in Cognition, 7, 251. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00251
16. Grange, J. A., & Cross, E. (2015). Can time-based decay explain temporal distinctiveness effects in task switching? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68, 19 - 45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17470218 .2014.934696
17. Grange, J. A., & Houghton, G. (2009). Temporal cue-target overlap is not essential for backward inhibition in task switching. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 2069-2080.
18. Grange, J. A., & Houghton, G. (2010). Heightened conflict in cue-target translation increases backward inhibition in set switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1003- 1009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0019129
19. Grange, J. A., & Houghton, G. (2014a). Models of cognitive control in task switching. In J. A. Grange & G. Houghton (Eds.), Task switching and cognitive control (pp. 160-199). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
20. Grange, J. A., & Houghton, G. (Eds.). (2014b). Task switching and cognitive control. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
21. Grange, J. A., & Juvina, I. (2015). The effect of practice on n-2 repetition costs in set switching. Acta Psychologica, 154, 14-25. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.11.003
22. Grange, J. A., Juvina, I., & Houghton, G. (2013). On costs and benefits of n-2 repetitions in task switching: Towards a behavioural marker of cognitive inhibition. Psychological Research, 77, 211-222.
23. Horoufchin, H., Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2011a). The dissipating task-repetition benefit in cued task switching: Task-set decay or temporal distinctiveness? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 455-472.
24. Horoufchin, H., Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2011b). Temporal distinctiveness and repetition benefits in task switching: Disentangling stimulusrelated and response-related contributions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 434-446.
25. Houghton, G., Pritchard, R., & Grange, J. A. (2009). The role of cue-target translation in backward inhibition of attentional set. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 466-476.
26. Jonides, J., & Mack, R. (1984). On the cost and benefit of cost and benefit. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 29-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909 .96.1.29
27. Kiesel, A., Steinhauser, M., Wendt, M., Falkstein, M., Jost, K., Philipp, A., & Koch, I. (2010). Control and interference in task switching: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 849-874.
28. Koch, I., Gade, M., Schuch, S., & Philipp, A. M. (2010). The role of inhibition in task switching: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 1-14.
29. Kowalczyk, A. W., & Grange, J. A. (in press). Inhibition in task switching: The reliability of the n-2 repetition cost. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.
30. Kruschke, J. (2013). Bayesian estimation supersedes the t test. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 573-603. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1037/a0029146
31. Law, V., Philipp, A. M., Schuch, S., & Koch, I. (2012). The role of task preparation and task inhibition in age-related task-switching deficits. Psychology and Aging, 27, 1130 -1137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ a0027455
32. Logan, G. D., & Schneider, D. W. (2006). Interpreting instructional cues in task switching procedures: The role of mediator retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 347- 363.
33. Mayr, U. (2002). Inhibition of action rules. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 93-99.
34. Mayr, U. (2006). What matters in the cued task-switching paradigm: Tasks or cues? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 794-799.
35. Mayr, U. (2007). Inhibition of task sets. In D. S. Gorfein & C. M. MacLeod (Eds.), Inhibition in cognition (pp. 27-44). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
36. Mayr, U., & Keele, S. W. (2000). Changing internal constraints on action: The role of backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 4-26.
37. Mayr, U., & Kliegl, R. (2000). Task-set switching and long-term memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1124-1140.
38. Meiran, N., Chorev, Z., & Sapir, A. (2000). Component processes in task switching. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 211-253.
39. Morey, R. D., & Rouder, J. N. (2015). Bayesfactor: Computation of bayes factors for common designs [Computer software manual]. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=BayesFactor (R package version 0.9.12-2)
40. Moritz, S., Hübner, M., & Kluwe, R. (2004). Task switching and backward inhibition in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 26, 677-683.
41. Neill, W. T. (1997). Episodic retrieval in negative priming and repetition priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1291-1305.
42. Philipp, A. M., Gade, M., & Koch, I. (2007). Inhibitory processes in language switching: Evidence from switching language-defined response sets. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19, 395-416.
43. Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2006). Task inhibition and task repetition in task switching. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 18, 624- 639.
44. Prior, A. (2012). Too much of a good thing: Stronger bilingual inhibition leads to larger lag-2 task repetition costs. Cognition, 125, 1-12. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.06.019
45. R Core Team. (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software manual]. Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/
46. Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D., Verhagen, J., Swagman, A. R., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (in press). Bayesian analysis of factorial designs. Psychological Methods.
47. Rouder, J. N., Speckman, P. L., Sun, D., Morey, R. D., & Iverson, G. (2009). Bayesian t-tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 225-237.
48. Scheil, J. (2016). Effects of absolute and relative practice on n-2 repetition costs. Acta Psychologica, 164, 65-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy .2015.12.011
49. Schneider, D. W., & Verbruggen, F. (2008). Inhibition of irrelevant category-response mappings. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 1629-1640.
50. Schoenbrodt, F. D., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Zehetleitner, M., & Perugini, M. (in press). Sequential hypothesis testing with bayes factors: Efficiently testing mean differences. Psychological Methods.
51. Schuch, S., & Koch, I. (2003). The role of response selection for inhibition of task sets in task shifting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 92-105.
52. Sdoia, S., & Ferlazzo, F. (2008). Stimulus-related inhibition of task set during task switching. Experimental Psychology, 55, 322-327.
53. Vandierendonck, A., Liefooghe, B., & Verbruggen, F. (2010). Task switching: Interplay of reconfiguration and interference. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 601-626.
54. Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2007). A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 779-804.
55. Wagenmakers, E.-J., Krypotos, A.-M., Criss, A. H., & Iverson, G. (2012). On the interpretation of removable interactions: A survey of the field 33 years after loftus. Memory & Cognition, 40, 145-160. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.3758/s13421-011-0158-0
56. Whitmer, A. J., & Banich, M. T. (2007). Inhibition versus switching deficits in different forms of rumination. Psychological Science, 18, 546-553. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01936.x
57. Whitmer, A. J., & Banich, M. T. (2012). Brain activity related to the ability to inhibit previous task sets: An fmri study. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 12, 661- 670. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/ s13415-012-0118-6